DOCSLIB.ORG

Raskin Umweltplanung Und Umweltberatung Gbr

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Raskin Umweltplanung Und Umweltberatung Gbr raskin Umweltplanung und Umweltberatung GbR Titel: Aachener Artenschutzkonzept (I. Stufe) Auswertung und Beschreibung der Artengruppen mit Identifizierung bedeutsamer Arten Datum: 31.10.2013 Auftraggeber: Stadt Aachen Ansprechpartner: Herr Dr. W. Engels (Fachbereich Umwelt) Auftrag vom: 15. Dezember 2011 Projekt-Nr.: 51-11 Auftragnehmer: raskin, Umweltplanung und -beratung GbR Projektleitung: Dr. Richard Raskin Projektbearbeitung: Dipl.-Umweltwiss. Sarah Geilenkirchen Dipl.-Biol. Daniel Lück Dipl.-Biol. Dorothee Raskin Dipl.-Biol. Dr. Richard Raskin Dipl.-Geog. Anja Werfling Dipl.-Biol. Dr. Ludger Wirooks Kartographie / Digitalisierung: Dipl.-Umweltwiss. Sarah Geilenkirchen Dipl.-Umweltwiss. Jörn Gutzeit Dorothee Raskin + Dr. Richard Raskin Kirberichshofer Weg 6, D-52066 Aachen Fon +49(0)241-53 43 39, Fax +49(0)241-54 36 18, [email protected] raskin Aachener Artenschutzkonzept - Stufe I I INHALTSVERZEICHNIS Seite 1 Einleitung.........................................................................................................1 2 Ausgangslage .................................................................................................1 3 Ziele und Aufgabenstellung ...........................................................................2 3.1 Ziele..........................................................................................................2 3.2 Aufgabenstellung......................................................................................3 4 Vorgehensweise und Methoden ....................................................................4 4.1 Beschaffung und Sichtung vorhandener Daten ........................................4 4.2 Auswertung der beschafften Daten ..........................................................4 4.3 Befragung von lokalen Artenexperten.......................................................5 4.4 Digitalisierung von Fundpunkten gefährdeter und planungsrelevanter Arten.........................................................................................................5 4.5 Identifizierung der naturschutzfachlich und artenschutzrechtlich bedeutsamen Arten ..................................................................................6 4.5.1 Naturschutzfachlich bedeutsame Arten..........................................6 4.5.2 Artenschutzrechtlich bedeutsame Arten.........................................9 5 Artengruppen, Artenvielfalt und Kenntnisstand ........................................10 6 Pflanzen .........................................................................................................12 6.1 Farn- und Blütenpflanzen (Pteridophyta et Spermatophyta)................12 6.1.1 Bearbeitungsstand .......................................................................12 6.1.2 Artenspektrum..............................................................................13 6.1.3 Vorkommen von gefährdeten und geschützten Arten im Stadtgebiet...................................................................................13 6.1.4 Bedeutsame Arten .......................................................................48 6.1.5 Verbreitungsschwerpunkte und wichtige Lebensräume...............51 6.1.6 Kenntnisdefizite............................................................................51 6.1.7 Ausgewertete Quellen zu Farn- und Blütenpflanzen....................52 6.2 Moose (Hepaticophyta, Anthocerotophyta und Bryophyta)....................57 6.2.1 Bearbeitungsstand .......................................................................57 6.2.2 Artenspektrum..............................................................................57 6.2.3 Vorkommen von gefährdeten und geschützten Arten im Stadtgebiet...................................................................................58 6.2.4 Bedeutsame Arten .......................................................................65 6.2.5 Verbreitungsschwerpunkte und wichtige Lebensräume...............66 6.2.6 Kenntnisdefizite............................................................................66 6.2.7 Ausgewertete Quellen zu Moosen ...............................................67 raskin Aachener Artenschutzkonzept - Stufe I II 6.3 Flechten (Lichenes) ...............................................................................68 6.3.1 Bearbeitungsstand .......................................................................68 6.3.2 Artenspektrum..............................................................................68 6.3.3 Vorkommen von gefährdeten und geschützten Arten im Stadtgebiet...................................................................................68 6.3.4 Bedeutsame Arten .......................................................................69 6.3.5 Verbreitungsschwerpunkte und wichtige Lebensräume...............72 6.3.6 Kenntnisdefizite............................................................................72 6.3.7 Ausgewertete Quellen zu Flechten ..............................................72 7 Tiere ...............................................................................................................73 7.1 Säugetiere (Mammalia) .........................................................................73 7.1.1 Bearbeitungsstand .......................................................................73 7.1.2 Artenspektrum..............................................................................73 7.1.3 Vorkommen von gefährdeten und geschützten Arten im Stadtgebiet...................................................................................73 7.1.4 Bedeutsame Arten .......................................................................79 7.1.5 Verbreitungsschwerpunkte und wichtige Lebensräume...............80 7.1.6 Kenntnisdefizite............................................................................80 7.1.7 Ausgewertete Quellen zu Säugetieren.........................................81 7.2 Vögel (Aves) ..........................................................................................84 7.2.1 Bearbeitungsstand .......................................................................84 7.2.2 Artenspektrum..............................................................................84 7.2.3 Vorkommen von gefährdeten und geschützten Arten im Stadtgebiet...................................................................................84 7.2.4 Bedeutsame Arten .......................................................................99 7.2.5 Verbreitungsschwerpunkte und wichtige Lebensräume.............100 7.2.6 Kenntnisdefizite..........................................................................100 7.2.7 Ausgewertete Quellen zu Vögeln...............................................101 7.3 Amphibien (Amphibia).........................................................................106 7.3.1 Bearbeitungsstand .....................................................................106 7.3.2 Artenspektrum............................................................................106 7.3.3 Vorkommen von gefährdeten und geschützten Arten im Stadtgebiet.................................................................................107 7.3.4 Bedeutsame Arten .....................................................................110 7.3.5 Verbreitungsschwerpunkte und wichtige Lebensräume.............110 7.3.6 Kenntnisdefizite..........................................................................112 7.3.7 Ausgewertete Quellen zu Amphibien .........................................113 7.4 Reptilien (Reptilia) ...............................................................................115 7.4.1 Bearbeitungsstand .....................................................................115 7.4.2 Artenspektrum............................................................................115 7.4.3 Vorkommen von gefährdeten und geschützten Arten im Stadtgebiet.................................................................................115 7.4.4 Bedeutsame Arten .....................................................................117 7.4.5 Verbreitungsschwerpunkte und wichtige Lebensräume.............117 7.4.6 Kenntnisdefizite..........................................................................118 raskin Aachener Artenschutzkonzept - Stufe I III 7.4.7 Ausgewertete Quellen zu Reptilien ............................................118 7.5 Fische und Rundmäuler (Pisces et Cyclostoma) ...............................119 7.5.1 Bearbeitungsstand .....................................................................119 7.5.2 Artenspektrum............................................................................119 7.5.3 Vorkommen von gefährdeten und geschützten Arten im Stadtgebiet.................................................................................119 7.5.4 Bedeutsame Arten .....................................................................123 7.5.5 Verbreitungsschwerpunkte und wichtige Lebensräume.............123 7.5.6 Kenntnisdefizite..........................................................................124 7.5.7 Ausgewertete Quellen zu Fischen und Rundmäulern ................125 7.6 Flusskrebse (Astacidae et Cambaridae) .............................................126 7.6.1 Bearbeitungsstand .....................................................................126 7.6.2 Artenspektrum............................................................................126 7.6.3 Vorkommen von gefährdeten und geschützten Arten im Stadtgebiet.................................................................................127
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 和路克拉顶蛛terminatus Lukla
    六、图 版 A D 图130 家福新漏斗蛛 Neagelena jiafu (A-B)和路克拉顶蛛 Terminatus lukla (C-F). B E A. 雄孔上纺管 (Epiandrous spigots); B. 基节后膜 (Retrocoxal hymen); C. 前侧纺器 C F (ALS); D. 后中纺器 (PMS); E. 后侧纺器(PLS); F. 听毛 (Trichobothrium). - 485 - 河北大学理学博士学位论文 图131 路克拉顶蛛 Terminatus lukla (A-C)、普氏亚隙蛛 Asiacoelotes plancyi (D)和微 A D 光隙蛛 Coelotes nitidus (E-F). A. 雄孔上纺管 (Epiandrous spigots); B. 基节后膜 B E (Retrocoxal hymen); C. 纳精囊头 (Spermathecal head); D. 基节后膜 (Retrocoxal C F hymen); E. 前侧纺器 (ALS); F. 后中纺器 (PMS). - 486 - 六、图 版 A D 图132 微光隙蛛 Coelotes nitidus (A-C) 和波状隙蛛 Coelotes undulatus (D-F). B E A. 后侧纺器(PLS); B. 听毛 (Trichobothrium); C. 雄孔上纺管 (Epiandrous C F spigots); D. 前侧纺器 (ALS); E. 后中纺器 (PMS); F. 后侧纺器(PLS). - 487 - 河北大学理学博士学位论文 图133 波状隙蛛 Coelotes undulatus (A-C)、蕾形花冠蛛 Coronilla gemata (D-E) 和 A D 污浊龙隙蛛Draconarius lutulentus (F). A. 听毛 (Trichobothrium); B. 跗节器 B E (Tarsal organ); C-D. 雄孔上纺管 (Epiandrous spigots); E. 基节后膜 (Retrocoxal C F hymen); F. 雄孔上纺管 (Epiandrous spigots). - 488 - 六、图 版 图 134 污浊龙隙蛛Draconarius lutulentus (A) 、刺瓣拟隙蛛 Paracoelotes A D spinivulvus (B) 和廻弯囊隙蛛 Saccoelotes palinitropus (F). A-B. 基节后膜 B E (Retrocoxal hymen); C. 前侧纺器 (ALS); D. 后中纺器 (PMS); E. 后侧纺器 C F (PLS); F. 雄孔上纺管 (Epiandrous spigots). - 489 - 河北大学理学博士学位论文 A D 图135 廻弯囊隙蛛 Saccoelotes palinitropus (A-B)和耳状弧蛛 Curvata auricularta B E (C-F). A. 雄孔上纺管 (Epiandrous spigots); B. 基节后膜 (Retrocoxal hymen); C. 前 C F 侧纺器 (ALS); D. 后中纺器 (PMS); E. 后侧纺器 (PLS); F. 听毛 (Trichobothrium). - 490 - 六、图 版 A D 图 136 耳状弧蛛 Curvata auricularta (A-D) 和触形伪塔姆蛛 Pseudotamgrinia B E palpator (E-F).
    [Show full text]
  • The Pyrenees
    The Pyrenees A Greentours Holiday for the Alpine Garden Society 10th to 23rd June 2011 Led by Paul Cardy Trip Report and Systematic Lists by Paul Cardy Day 1 Friday 10 th June Arrival and Transfer to Formigueres Having driven from the south western Alps and reached Carcassonne the previous evening, I continued to Toulouse to meet the group at the airport. I was unexpectedly delayed by French customs who stopped me at the toll booth entering the city. There followed a lengthy questioning, as I had to unpack the contents of my suspiciously empty Italian mini-bus and show them my two large boxes of books, suitcase full of clothes, picnic supplies, etc., to convince them my purpose was a botanical tour to the Pyrenees. Now a little late I arrived breathlessly at Toulouse airport and rushed to the gate to meet Margaret, and the New Zealand contingent of Chris, Monica, Archie and Lynsie, hurriedly explaining the delay. Anyway we were soon back on the motorway and heading south towards Foix. White Storks in a field on route was a surprise. We made a picnic stop at a functional aire where there were tables, and a selection of weedy plants. Black Kite soared overhead. Once past Foix and Ax-les- Thermes the scenery became ever more interesting as we wound our way up to a misty Col de Puymorens. There a short stop yielded Pulsatilla vernalis in fruit and Trumpet Gentians. Roadside cliffs had Rock Soapwort, Saxifraga paniculata , and Elder-flowered Orchids became numerous. Now in the Parc Naturel Régional des Pyrénées Catalanes, a fascinating route down into the valley took us through Saillagouse and Mont-Louis before heading up a minor road to the village of Formigueres, our base for the first three nights.
    [Show full text]
  • Research of the Biodiversity of Tovacov Lakes
    Research of the biodiversity of Tovacov lakes (Czech Republic) Main researcher: Jan Ševčík Research group: Vladislav Holec Ondřej Machač Jan Ševčík Bohumil Trávníček Filip Trnka March – September 2014 Abstract We performed biological surveys of different taxonomical groups of organisms in the area of Tovacov lakes. Many species were found: 554 plant species, 107 spider species, 27 dragonflies, 111 butterfly species, 282 beetle species, orthopterans 17 and 7 amphibian species. Especially humid and dry open habitats and coastal lake zones were inhabited by many rare species. These biotopes were found mainly at the places where mining residuals were deposited or at the places which were appropriately prepared for mining by removing the soil to the sandy gravel base (on conditions that the biotope was still in contact with water level and the biotope mosaic can be created at the slopes with low inclination and with different stages of ecological succession). Field study of biotope preferences of the individual species from different places created during mining was performed using phytosociological mapping and capture traps. Gained data were analyzed by using ordinate analyses (DCA, CCA). Results of these analyses were interpreted as follows: Technically recultivated sites are quickly getting species – homogenous. Sites created by ecological succession are species-richer during their development. Final ecological succession stage (forest) can be achieved in the same time during ecological succession as during technical recultivation. According to all our research results most biologically valuable places were selected. Appropriate management was suggested for these places in order to achieve not lowering of their biological diversity. To even improve their biological diversity some principles and particular procedures were formulated.
    [Show full text]
  • The Species of Macrolepidoptera Collected from Cisnădioara and Cisnădie, County Sibiu, Existing Within the Collection of Dr
    Muzeul Olteniei Craiova. Oltenia. Studii şi comunicări. Ştiinţele Naturii. Tom. 35, No. 2/2019 ISSN 1454-6914 THE SPECIES OF MACROLEPIDOPTERA COLLECTED FROM CISNĂDIOARA AND CISNĂDIE, COUNTY SIBIU, EXISTING WITHIN THE COLLECTION OF DR. VIKTOR WEINDEL STANCĂ-MOISE Cristina Abstract. The present study makes an important contribution to the knowledge of fauna of lepidoptera collected between the years 1904-1956, from the surroundings of Sibiu. The paper systematically presents the collected material from localities of Cisnădie (Măgura Cisnădiei) updating the nomenclature according to the latest published lepidoptera list in Romania: Catalog of lepidoptera of Romania (RÁKOSY et al., 2003). The systematic list includes 10 Macrolepidoptere families, totalizing a number of 166 species, the most representative species being the families which belong to the families: Geometridae, Papilionidae, Lycaenidae și Nymphalidae. The specimens collected over 52 years, represents a valuable contribution to the knowledge of the lepidopteran species existing in the past in the towns of Cisnădioara and Cisnădie in the Sibiu County. Keywords: Lepidoptera, collection Dr. V. Weindel, Cisnădioara, Cisnădie and Măgura Cisnădiei, Sibiu, biodiversity. Rezumat. Specii de lepidoptere colectate din Cisnădioara și Cisnădie, județul Sibiu, existente în cadrul colecției dr. Viktor Weindel. Prezentul studiu aduce o contribuție importantă la cunoașterea faunei de lepidoptere colectate între anii 1904- 1956, din împrejurimile Sibiului. Lucrarea prezintă în ordine sistematică materialului colectat din localitățile Cisnădioara, Cisnădie (Măgura Cisnădiei), actualizându-se nomenclatura după ultima listă publicată a lepidopterelor din România: Catalogul lepidopterelor României (RÁKOSY et al., 2003). Lista sistematică cuprinde 10 familii de Macrolepidoptere, totalizând un număr de 166 de specii, cel mai bine reprezentate fiind speciile aparținând Familiilor: Geometridae, Papilionidae, Lycaenidae și Nymphalidae.
    [Show full text]
  • Pyrenees Wildlife Tour Report Botanical Birdwatching Butterfly Holiday
    The Pyrenees French & Spanish A Greentours Natural History Holiday 10th to 23rd June 2013 Led by Paul Cardy Trip Report and Systematic Lists by Paul Cardy Day 1 Monday 10th June Arrival and Transfer to Cerdagne Having driven from the south western Alps, and having arrived in Toulouse the previous evening, I met the group at the airport in the morning. After loading the mini-bus, and having negotiated the complex road system around Toulouse, soon we were on the motorway and heading south towards Foix. Black Kite soared overhead, White Stork was seen, and a Montagu’s Harrier soared over arable fields. Once past Foix we stopped at a lakeside for a first picnic, of baguette, fruit, juice, etc. Here was Great Spotted Woodpecker, and Mandarin was added to the bird list! After Ax-les-Thermes the scenery became ever more interesting as we wound our way up to the Col de Puymorens. The road over the col was rather busier than usual today as the eponymous tunnel below it was closed for several months of repair work. Our first botanical stop was made for a slope sporting much fine Pyrenean Lily, an early highlight. This really was in superb flower today and although much was out of reach there were some fine examples within easy reach for photography. Also here was Silene rupestris. At the col itself, the slopes around still sporting much snow in this very atypical season, the rather late flora had some fine Pulsatilla vernalis and Trumpet Gentians. White flowers were a feature, with Ranunculus kuepferi and Anemone nemorosa alongside the pasque flowers.
    [Show full text]
  • Acta Musei Devensis
    www.mcdr.ro / www.cimec.ro ACTA MUSEI DEVENSIS S A R G E T I A SERIES SCIENTIA NATURAE XIX DEVA - 2002 www.mcdr.ro / www.cimec.ro REDACŢIA REDACTION EDITORIAL BOARD SILVIA BURNAZ MARCELA BALAZS CORALIA MARIA JIANU CRISTINA CIRCO Tehnoredactare: DORINA DAN SARGETIA SARGETIA ACTA MUSEI DEVENSIS ACTA MUSEI DEVENSIS SERIES SCIENTIA NATURAE SERIES SCIENTIA NATURAE L'adresse: Adress: Le Musée de la Civilisation Dacique et Romaine. The Museum of Dacian and Roman Civilisation. La section des Sciences Naturelles The Natural Sciences Section Rue 1 Decembre 39- DEVA 39, 1 December Street - DEVA ROUMANIE ROMANIA E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Responsabilitatea conţinutului ştiinţific şi a traducerii revine autorilor All the responsability for the scientific content and translation goes to the authors www.mcdr.ro / www.cimec.ro CONTENTS - SOMMAIRE ANGELA D. BUSCALIONI - The European Upper Cretaceous Crocodilian fossil record ………………...… 5 FRANCISCO ORTEGA JOHN W. JAGT, - Recent Addition to the Late Maastrichtian Mosasaur faunas of Liège Limburg ERIC W. MULDER, (The Netherlands, Belgium) …………………………………………………….. 13 RUDI W. DORTANGS, MARCEL M. M. KUYPERS, HANS H. G. PEETERS, LOUIS VERDING ANNE S. SCHULP - The effects of tectonic deformation on dinosaur trackway morphology ……… 27 FRANCOIS THERRIEN, - Paleoenvironmental reconstruction of latest Cretaceous dinosaur-bearing CORALIA - MARIA JIANU, formations of Romania: preliminary results ……………………………………. 33 BOGDAN SCARLAT, DAVID B. WEISHAMPEL, JOHN W. KING MIHAELA SOPINCEAN - L’Est des Montagnes Poiana Ruscă – Arguments écoprotectif …………….…. 61 CRISTINA CIRCO - Macromycetes from the Natural Reserve of Bejan Forest (Hunedoara County, Romania) ……………………………………………………………………….. 73 CRISTINA CIRCO - Data concerning the Macromycetes from the hillocky region of Veţel locality (Hunedoara County, Romania) ………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Native European Spiders Follows the Prey Attraction Pattern of Introduced Carnivorous Pitcher Plants
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/410399; this version posted September 7, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Distribution of native European spiders follows the prey attraction pattern of introduced carnivorous pitcher plants Axel Zander*, Marie-Amélie Girardet and Louis-Félix Bersier Department of Biology – Ecology and Evolution, University of Fribourg, Chemin du Musée 10, Fribourg CH-1700, Switzerland * E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Carnivorous plants and spiders are known to compete for resources. In North America, spiders of the genus Agelenopsis are known to build funnel-webs, using Sarracenia purpurea pitchers as a base, retreat and storage room. They also very likely profit from the insect attraction of S. purpurea. In a fen in Europe , S. purpurea was introduced ~65 years ago and co-occurs with native insect predators. Despite the absence of common evolutionary history, we observed native funnels-spiders (genus Agelena) building funnel webs on top of S. purpurea in similar ways as Agelelopsis. Furthermore, we observed specimen of the raft-spider (Dolmedes fimbriatus) and the pygmy-shrew (Sorex minutus) stealing prey-items out of the pitchers. We conducted an observational study, comparing plots with and without S. purpurea, to test if Agelena were attracted by S. purpurea, and found that their presence indeed increases Agelena abundance. Additionally, we tested if this facilitation was due to the structure provided for building webs or enhanced prey availability. Since the number of webs matched the temporal pattern of insect attraction by the plant, we conclude that the gain in food is likely the key factor for web installation.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of the Spiders of Turkey
    _____________Mun. Ent. Zool. Vol. 12, No. 2, June 2017__________ 433 ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE SPIDERS OF TURKEY Hakan Demir* and Osman Seyyar* * Niğde University, Faculty of Science and Arts, Department of Biology, TR–51100 Niğde, TURKEY. E-mails: [email protected]; [email protected] [Demir, H. & Seyyar, O. 2017. Annotated checklist of the spiders of Turkey. Munis Entomology & Zoology, 12 (2): 433-469] ABSTRACT: The list provides an annotated checklist of all the spiders from Turkey. A total of 1117 spider species and two subspecies belonging to 52 families have been reported. The list is dominated by members of the families Gnaphosidae (145 species), Salticidae (143 species) and Linyphiidae (128 species) respectively. KEY WORDS: Araneae, Checklist, Turkey, Fauna To date, Turkish researches have been published three checklist of spiders in the country. The first checklist was compiled by Karol (1967) and contains 302 spider species. The second checklist was prepared by Bayram (2002). He revised Karol’s (1967) checklist and reported 520 species from Turkey. Latest checklist of Turkish spiders was published by Topçu et al. (2005) and contains 613 spider records. A lot of work have been done in the last decade about Turkish spiders. So, the checklist of Turkish spiders need to be updated. We updated all checklist and prepare a new checklist using all published the available literatures. This list contains 1117 species of spider species and subspecies belonging to 52 families from Turkey (Table 1). This checklist is compile from literature dealing with the Turkish spider fauna. The aim of this study is to determine an update list of spider in Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology and Phenology of Flight of Adults of Geometridae in the Conditions of the Khorezm Oasis Х.U
    International Journal of Academic Pedagogical Research (IJAPR) ISSN: 2643-9123 Vol. 4 Issue 10, October - 2020, Pages: 70-73 Biology And Phenology Of Flight Of Adults Of Geometridae In The Conditions Of The Khorezm Oasis Х.U. Bekchanov¹, М.Х. Bekchanov², G.Q.Komiljanova³. ¹ Сandidate of Zoological Sciences,Urgench State University of Uzbekistan. ² Phd doctor, Urgench State University of Uzbekistan. ³Student of the Faculty of natural Sciences, Urgench State University of Uzbekistan. [email protected] Abstract: The paper presents the results of biology and phenology of flight of adults of Geometridae in the conditions of the Khorezm Oasis, as well as a review of the literature on this topic. Presented 18 species of 2 subfamilies: Archiearinae and Sterrhinae, which also includes previously published information on finds in the region. Keywords—: Geometridae; Lepidoptera; Archiearinae and Sterrhinae; caterpillar; chrysalis; adult butterfly; phenology INTRODUCTION oligophages (Plum Geometridae (Angerona prunaria) and monophages) Winter Geometridae (Operophthera brumata). Butterflies of different shapes, small or medium-sized After feeding, the caterpillars go into the soil and pupate (average wingspan: 20-55 mm). Many species are there. characterized by a slender abdomen and wide wings. Some Pupa. The morphological structure is specific, but most species keep their wings spread out, some - folded top-like. often the pupae are smooth, reddish-brown and are in the There are species in which females are short-winged or ground in a cocoon or without it. Species of such genera as without wings at all. Some species have a thick body, which Ourapteryx, Selenia, Angerona pupate on tree branches in gives them a certain resemblance to cocoons.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Großschmetterlinge (Macrolepidoptera) Der Diluviallandschaften Um Eberswalde
    68 (2): 177 – 346 2018 © 2018 SenckenbergThe Authors Gesellschaft für Naturforschung Die Großschmetterlinge (Macrolepidoptera) der Diluviallandschaften um Eberswalde. Vierter Nachtrag, Ergänzungen zur Verbreitung, Biologie und Phänologie seit 2013 Mit 28 Figuren und 27 Tabellen Arnold Richert 1 Altenhofer Straße 68, 16227 Eberswalde Published on 2018–12–06 DOI:10.21248/contrib.entomol.68.2.177-346 Zusammenfassung Die Entwicklung der Großschmetterlingsfauna der Diluviallandschaften um Eberswalde wurde bis zum Jahre 2018 unter Berücksichtigung folgender Schwerpunkte fortgeschrieben: (1) Veränderungen im Artenbestand: Vier Arten wurden neu nachgewiesen; acht als verschollen gemeldete Arten wurden wieder entdeckt, darunter als besonders bemerkenwerte Wiederfunde die Noctuide Eremobia ochroleuca nach >60 Jahren und die Geometride Eustroma reticulata nach 33 Jahren; neun Arten des bisherigen Bestandes werden als verschollen gemeldet. (2) Ergänzungen zur Kenntnis der Biologie, insbesondere der Nahrungsökologie der Tagfalter, sowie der aktuellen Veränderungen der Phänologie. (3) Auswertung älterer Quellen, die dem Verfasser bisher nicht bekannt waren; dadurch konnte das Gesamtbild der Großschmetterlingsfauna abgerundet werden. (4) Abschließende Analyse des Durchforschungrades der einzelnen Naturräume des Gebietes. Schlüsselwörter Tagfalter, Nachtfalter, Phänologie, Ökologie, Zeitreihen, Langzeituntersuchung, Artenzusammensetzung, Naturschutz, Brandenburg Abstract The changes in the fauna of macrolepidoptera of the diluvial landscapes around Eberswalde
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Chemotactile Cues in Interspecific Interactions Among
    The role of chemotactile cues in interspecific interactions among Central-European arthropod communities Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades Doktor der Naturwissenschaften Am Fachbereich Biologie der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität in Mainz Hellena Binz geboren am 10.09.1984 in Bühl (Baden) Mainz, 2014 Dekan: Prof. Dr. Hans Zischler 1. Berichterstatter: Prof. Dr. Susanne Foitzik 2. Berichterstatter: Prof. Dr. Martin Entling Datum der mündlichen Prüfung: 19.12.2014 II Contents Summary 1 Zusammenfassung 2 General introduction 3 1. Effects of spider cues on arthropod behavior 11 1.1. Abstract 13 1.2. Introduction 14 1.3. Methods 16 1.4. Results 21 1.5. Discussion 25 1.6. Conclusion 29 1.7. Acknowledgements 29 2. Knowing the risk: crickets distinguish between spider predators of different size and commonness 31 2.1. Abstract 33 2.2. Introduction 34 2.3. Methods 38 2.4. Results 43 2.5. Discussion 46 2.6. Acknowledgements 52 2.7. Appendix 53 3. Behavioral response of a generalist predator to chemotactile cues of two taxonomically distinct prey species 55 3.1. Abstract 57 3.2. Introduction 58 3.3. Methods 61 3.4. Results 65 3.5. Discussion 68 3.6. Conclusion 71 3.7. Acknowledgements 71 III 4. The chemistry of competition: Exploitation of heterospecific cues depends on the dominance rank in the community 73 4.1. Abstract 75 4.2. Introduction 76 4.3. Methods 78 4.4. Results 84 4.5. Discussion 88 4.6. Conclusion 93 4.7. Acknowledgements 93 4.8. Appendix 95 General discussion 97 References 105 Appendix 119 Author contributions 119 Author affiliations 119 Curriculum vitae 120 Declaration/Versicherung 123 Acknowledgements 125 IV Summary Organisms that inhabit the same ecosystem can influence each other either via direct interactions but also indirectly by emitting chemotactile cues in the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Spider Fauna on Ulleungdo Island in Korea
    Anim. Syst. Evol. Divers. Vol. 37, No. 2: 101-128, April 2021 https://doi.org/10.5635/ASED.2021.37.2.088 Review article Spider Fauna on Ulleungdo Island in Korea Sue Yeon Lee1, Jung Sun Yoo2, Taeseo Park2, Kwang Soo Kim3, Seung Tae Kim4,* 1College of Agricultural Life Science, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Korea 2Biological and Genetic Resources Utilization Division, National Institute of Biological Resources, Incheon 22689, Korea 3Animal Resources Division, National Institute of Biological Resources, Incheon 22689, Korea 4Life and Environment Research Institute, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea ABSTRACT The present study was conducted to establish a comprehensive checklist of spiders on Ulleungdo Island in Korea. Past records were compiled and four new surveys of spiders in Ulleungdo Island were conducted from May to September 2019. The surveys were conducted at 18 sites in seven of the nine major administrative districts. A total of 114 species from 84 genera in 26 families were identified from 958 individual spiders. The 21 spider species belonging to 10 families were added to the known spider fauna on Ulleungdo Island from the present study. The survey results were combined present results with previous records showed there were 242 species from 143 genera in 32 families on Ulleungdo Island. The species richness in each family was high, in the order Araneidae, Theridiidae, Salticidae, Linyphiidae, Tetragnathidae, Thomisidae, Gnaphodidae and Philodromidae. Four Korean endemic species, Coscinida ulleungensis Paik, 1995, Steatoda ulleungensis Paik, 1995, Drassodes taehadongensis Paik, 1995 and Phrurolithus pennatoides Seo, 2018, found only on Ulleungdo Island. In addition, the following six indigenous species that inhabit only in Ulleungdo Island: Euryopis octomaculata (Paik, 1995), Porrhomma montanum Jackson, 1913, Piratula knorri (Scopoli, 1763), Cladothela parva Kamura, 1991, Cladothela unciinsignita (Bösenberg and Strand, 1906) and Clubiona tongdaoensis Zhang, Yin, Bao and Kim, 1997.
    [Show full text]