DOCSLIB.ORG

Detection of Predators Within Brassica Crops: a Search for Predators of Diamondback Moth (Plutella Xylostella) and Other Important Pests

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Detection of Predators Within Brassica Crops: a Search for Predators of Diamondback Moth (Plutella Xylostella) and Other Important Pests African Journal of Agricultural Research Vol. 7(23), pp. 3473-3484, 19 June, 2012 Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/AJAR DOI: 10.5897/AJAR11.2073 ISSN 1991-637X ©2012 Academic Journals Full Length Research Paper Detection of predators within Brassica crops: A search for predators of diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella) and other important pests Reza Hosseini1*, Otto Schmidt2 and Michael A. Keller2 1Department of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture, University of Guilan, P. O. Box 41635-1314, Rasht, Iran. 2Discipline of Plant and Food Science, School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, Waite Campus, University of Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia. Accepted 28 March, 2012 Techniques based on the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) have been shown to be powerful tools for ecological studies of predator-prey interactions. By using developed species-specific primers from the cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) gene for six insect pests of Brassica crops (Plutella xylostella, Pieris rapae, Hellula hydralis, Helicoverpa punctigera, Brevicoryne brassicae, and Myzus persicae) trophic relationships of selected predators and their prey in Brassica fields demonstrated the potential of DNA-based techniques to screen predator communities and to identify their prey. In this investigation, all examined predators including Nabis kinbergii (Heimptera: Nabidae), Oechalia schellenbergii (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae), Micromus tasmaniae (Neuroptera: Hemerobiidae), Hippodamia variegata, Coccinella transversalis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) and four wolf spider species including Trochosa expolita, Venatrix pseudospeciosa, Venator spenceri and Hogna kuyani (Araneae: Lycosidae) showed polyphagy to some extent. All tested positive for P. xylostella, hence can be considered as predators of this pest. Although, the records of DNA from the guts of predators probably represent instances of real predation, but interpretation of predation data because of some errors is very difficult. There are limitations for this type of interpretation which has been comprehensively discussed in this paper. Key words: Molecular markers, predator, gut contents, Brassica crop, biological control. INTRODUCTION The value of predators in the biological control of insect of predators on pest populations and especially critical in pests in integrated pest management programs has been evaluating the effectiveness of a predator as a biological highlighted by many investigators (Hagler and Durand, control agent (Hayes and Lockley, 1990). There are 1994; Symondson et al., 2002). Identification of trophic inherent difficulties associated with the study of the diet relationships between predators and particular pests is breath of predators in nature because of the relatively one of the first important steps in determining the impact small size of both predator and prey, and their often elusive and nocturnal activity (Greenstone, 1996; Hoogendoorn and Heimpel, 2001). Consequently, there is a lack of knowledge about predators’ feeding behaviour *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected], in the natural environment; because of this difficulty, little [email protected]. Fax: +98-131-6690281. is known about predator-prey trophic interactions and the 3474 Afr. J. Agric. Res. effects of predators on pests of Brassica crops. However, Studies showed that Brassica crops have a rich fauna of to elucidate the role of predators in the control of these predators. Schmaedick and Shelton (2000) have pests, some experiments have been done under documented a list of predators associated with P. rapae laboratory conditions or in field cages (Schmaedick and in cabbage fields of New York State. Hosseini et al. Shelton, 1999), but these studies do not necessarily (2006b) reported a range of predators associated with accurately simulate field conditions. So far, the most Brassica pests in South Australia. The impact of effective and least disruptive method for studying predators on pests of Brassica crops has not been predation has been the development of biochemical thoroughly studied and therefore their potential in diagnostic technologies, monoclonal and polyclonal suppression of major pests of Brassica has not been antibodies (Symondson et al., 2002) and enzyme- elucidated. Hooks et al. (2003) found broccoli plants electrophoresis (Traugott, 2003) can be used to protected by birds and spiders as predators sustained determine which prey has been consumed by a predator. less damage from caterpillars and the plants had greater However, amplification of specific prey DNA using the productivity compared to control plants. Cage exclusion polymerase chain reaction has proven to be more experiments have shown that predation varies practical and cost-effective in detecting prey remains. considerably in space and time. Once it is developed, this assay can be used to Wang et al. (2004) estimated between 7 and 81% of efficiently and sensitively test large numbers of field- immature stages of P. xylostella were lost due to collected predators for evidence of feeding on a particular predation on farms in Queensland, Australia. prey species, such as key agricultural pest (Symondon, Subsequently, more extensive research (Furlong et al., 2002). PCR-based techniques are rapidly replacing other 2004) confirmed estimated losses of P. xylostella to molecular techniques because molecular biology facilities predation of the same magnitude, between 2 and 85%. A are widely available and prey-specific primers can be better understanding of the identities of key predators used in different contexts such as ecological, taxono- and factors that affect their feeding activities could enable mical, behavioral study of insects (Hoy, 2003) once they farmers and pest managers to conserve key predators. have been designed. This technique has been This would ensure that they more consistently kill 80% or successfully used for detection of a variety of prey more of immature diamondback moths. Hence, for this remains in predators’ gut contents (Zaidi et al., 1999; one insect, predators are known to cause considerable Chen et al., 2000; Hoogendoorn and Heimpel, 2001; mortality at times. It is essential to develop a reliable Agustí et al., 2003a, 2003b; Harper et al., 2005; Juen and technique to evaluate the diets of key predatory species Traugott, 2005; Read et al., 2006; Harwood et al., 2007; in order to understand their role in suppressing pests like Zhang et al., 2007; Kuusk and Agusti, 2008; Schmidt et P. xylostella. Ma et al. (2005) developed a species- al., 2009; Monzó et al., 2010). Brassica vegetables and specific marker for P. xylostella based on the internal oilseeds are economically important crops; approximately transcribed spacer (ITS-1) of the ribosomal gene. This 3.1 and 26.1 million ha respectively were grown specific primer pair was used to detect prey in the gut worldwide in 2004 (Food and Agriculture Organization of contents of two polyphagous predators, Nabis kinbergii the United Nations, 2009). These crops are associated and Trochosa expolita (reported as Lycosa sp.). In a pilot with several destructive and widespread insect pests. study of predation of diamondback moth on cauliflower Total damage caused by these pests is substantial; for and broccoli farms near Virginia, South Australia, the example, management costs for Plutella xylostella alone remains of P. xylostella were detected in the gut contents were estimated at US$ 1 billion annually in 1997 (Shelton of both species of field-collected predators. In the current et al., 1997). In Australia, the pests of Brassica crops study, cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) was selected include the lepidopterans P. xylostella, Pieris rapae, as a potentially diagnostic gene. As a mitochondrial gene, Hellula hydralis and Helicoverpa punctigera, and two it occurs as multiple copies in each cell (Hoy, 2003), aphids, Brevicoryne brassicae and Myzus persicae which increases the likelihood of successful amplification (Hosseini et al., 2006a). Integrated pest management of prey residues in the predators’ gut contents. This gene (IPM) systems and the use of biological control methods is a protein-coding gene that has a high level of are preferred approaches to controlling these pests over interspecific variability (Zhang and Hewitt, 1996), which insecticides due in part to the prevalence of insecticide allows closely related species to be separated. resistance in diamondback moth (Shelton et al., 1997). In the present study, a PCR-based technique was used Generalist predators can play a major role in the control for the first time to study predator-prey interactions of agricultural pests (Symondson et al., 2002); but this is extensively in Brassica crops. The aim of this research considered controversial (Rosenheim et al., 1993). reported in this paper was to determine the trophic Hosseini et al. 3475 relationships among predators and prey, mainly focusing primer pairs and 4 μl of DNA extract. The thermocycling program on the identification of predators of Brassica crops key consisted of an initial step of 2 min at 95°C, followed by 35 cycles of pest “diamondback moth” and other common pests. 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at the specific annealing temperature for each prey specific primer (Table 1), 1 min at 72°C and a final elongation step of 5 min at 72°C. PCR products were visualised following electrophoresis on 1.8% agarose gel in TAE containing 0.5 μl/ml MATERIALS AND METHODS ethidium bromide for DNA staining and then photographed. Each PCR assay had a positive (DNA
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Classical Biological Control of Arthropods in Australia
    Classical Biological Contents Control of Arthropods Arthropod index in Australia General index List of targets D.F. Waterhouse D.P.A. Sands CSIRo Entomology Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research Canberra 2001 Back Forward Contents Arthropod index General index List of targets The Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) was established in June 1982 by an Act of the Australian Parliament. Its primary mandate is to help identify agricultural problems in developing countries and to commission collaborative research between Australian and developing country researchers in fields where Australia has special competence. Where trade names are used this constitutes neither endorsement of nor discrimination against any product by the Centre. ACIAR MONOGRAPH SERIES This peer-reviewed series contains the results of original research supported by ACIAR, or material deemed relevant to ACIAR’s research objectives. The series is distributed internationally, with an emphasis on the Third World. © Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, GPO Box 1571, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia Waterhouse, D.F. and Sands, D.P.A. 2001. Classical biological control of arthropods in Australia. ACIAR Monograph No. 77, 560 pages. ISBN 0 642 45709 3 (print) ISBN 0 642 45710 7 (electronic) Published in association with CSIRO Entomology (Canberra) and CSIRO Publishing (Melbourne) Scientific editing by Dr Mary Webb, Arawang Editorial, Canberra Design and typesetting by ClarusDesign, Canberra Printed by Brown Prior Anderson, Melbourne Cover: An ichneumonid parasitoid Megarhyssa nortoni ovipositing on a larva of sirex wood wasp, Sirex noctilio. Back Forward Contents Arthropod index General index Foreword List of targets WHEN THE CSIR Division of Economic Entomology, now Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Entomology, was established in 1928, classical biological control was given as one of its core activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Ables, J.R., Shepard, M. & Holman, 1.R. 1976. Development of The
    Ables, J.R., Shepard, M. & Holman, 1.R. 1976. Development of the parasitoids Spalangia endius and Muscidifurax raptor in relation to constant and variable temperature: simulation and validation. Environmental Entomology 5,329-333 . Aldyhim, Y. N. & Khalil, A.F. 1993. Influence of temperature and day length on population development of Aphis gossypii in Cucurbita pepo. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 67, 167-172. Ali , A. & Gaylor, M.1. 1992. Effects of temperature and larval diet on development of the beet armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Environmental Entomology 21, 780-786. Ali, A., Luttrell, R.G. & Schneider, J.e. 1990. Effects of temperature and larval diet on development of the fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Annals ofEntomological Society ofAmerica 83, 725-733. Ali, A.S.A. & Watson, T.F. 1978. Effect of temperature on development and survival of Zelus renardii. Environmental Entomology 7, 889-891. Allen, G.R. & Keller, M.A . 1991. Uraba lugens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and its parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Braconidae): temperature, host size, and development. Environmental Entomology 20, 458-469. Allsopp, P.G. 1977. Biology and capacity for increase of Monistria discrepans (Walker) (Orthoptera: Pyrgomophidae) in the laboratory. Journal ofAustralian Entomological Society 16, 207-2l3. Allsopp, P. G., Cowie, B.A. & Franzmann, B.A. 1983. Development of immature stages of the Lucerne leafroller Merophyas divulsana (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) under constant temperatures and on several larval diets. Journal ofAustralian Entomological Society 22, 287-291. Al-Maliky, S.K., Al-Izzi, M.A.1. & Jabbo, NT 1988. Effects of temperature and photoperiod on the development and oviposition of Apanteles sp. Group Ultor (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a larval parasite of the Carob moth Ectomyelois ceratoniae (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae).
    [Show full text]
  • VINEYARD BIODIVERSITY and INSECT INTERACTIONS! ! - Establishing and Monitoring Insectariums! !
    ! VINEYARD BIODIVERSITY AND INSECT INTERACTIONS! ! - Establishing and monitoring insectariums! ! Prepared for : GWRDC Regional - SA Central (Adelaide Hills, Currency Creek, Kangaroo Island, Langhorne Creek, McLaren Vale and Southern Fleurieu Wine Regions) By : Mary Retallack Date : August 2011 ! ! ! !"#$%&'(&)'*!%*!+& ,- .*!/'01)!.'*&----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&2 3-! "&(')1+&'*&4.*%5"/0&#.'0.4%/+.!5&-----------------------------------------------------------------------------&6! ! &ABA <%5%+3!C0-72D0E2!AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!F! &A&A! ;D,!*2!G*0.*1%-2*3,!*HE0-3#+3I!AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!J! &AKA! ;#,2!0L!%+D#+5*+$!G*0.*1%-2*3,!*+!3D%!1*+%,#-.!AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!B&! 7- .*+%)!"/.18+&--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&,2! ! ! KABA ;D#3!#-%!*+2%53#-*MH2I!AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!BN! KA&A! O3D%-!C#,2!0L!L0-H*+$!#!2M*3#G8%!D#G*3#3!L0-!G%+%L*5*#82!AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!&P! KAKA! ?%8%53*+$!3D%!-*$D3!2E%5*%2!30!E8#+3!AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!&B! 9- :$"*!.*;&5'1/&.*+%)!"/.18&-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&3<!
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Insects, Spiders and Mites in Vegetable Crops: Workshop Manual Loopers Chrysodeixis Spp
    Important pests in vegetable crops This section gives descriptions of common pests found in Australian vegetable crops. They are listed according to the insect order they belong to. Moths and butterflies (Lepidoptera) Heliothis (corn earworm, tomato budworm, native budworm) Helicoverpa spp. Heliothis larvae feed as leaf eaters and bud and fruit borers on a wide range of plants, including many weeds. Adults lay round, domed, ribbed eggs that are cream when newly laid, turning brownish (‘brown ring’ stage) as they mature. Larvae grow up to 40 mm long and vary in colour from green through yellow and brown to almost black, with a pale stripe down each side. The moths have a wing span of 35–45 mm. Heliothis moth at rest These are some examples of heliothis damage to vegetable crops: • On lettuce and brassicas, larvae feed on the outer leaves or tunnel into the heart of the plant. • In tomato crops, eggs are laid on the leaves, flowers and fruit. Young larvae burrow into flowers causing them to fall and they cause pinhole damage to very young tomato fruit. Older larvae burrow into the fruit, creating holes and encouraging rots to develop. • In capsicum, larvae feed on the fruit and the seed inside the fruit. Eggs are laid mainly on leaves, but also on flowers and buds. Heliothis eggs on tomato shoot • In sweet corn, eggs are laid on the silks and leaves. Larvae feed on the developing grains on the cob, sometimes on the leaves and often inside the tip of the corn cob. • In green beans and peas, the larvae feed on the flowers, pods and developing seed inside the pods.
    [Show full text]
  • Dysdercus Cingulatus
    Prelims (F) Page i Monday, August 25, 2003 9:52 AM Biological Control of Insect Pests: Southeast Asian Prospects D.F. Waterhouse (ACIAR Consultant in Plant Protection) Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research Canberra 1998 Prelims (F) Page ii Monday, August 25, 2003 9:52 AM The Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) was established in June 1982 by an Act of the Australian Parliament. Its primary mandate is to help identify agricultural problems in developing countries and to commission collaborative research between Australian and developing country researchers in fields where Australia has special competence. Where trade names are used this constitutes neither endorsement of nor discrimination against any product by the Centre. ACIAR MONOGRAPH SERIES This peer-reviewed series contains the results of original research supported by ACIAR, or deemed relevant to ACIAR’s research objectives. The series is distributed internationally, with an emphasis on the Third World ©Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research GPO Box 1571, Canberra, ACT 2601. Waterhouse, D.F. 1998, Biological Control of Insect Pests: Southeast Asian Prospects. ACIAR Monograph No. 51, 548 pp + viii, 1 fig. 16 maps. ISBN 1 86320 221 8 Design and layout by Arawang Communication Group, Canberra Cover: Nezara viridula adult, egg rafts and hatching nymphs. Printed by Brown Prior Anderson, Melbourne ii Prelims (F) Page iii Monday, August 25, 2003 9:52 AM Contents Foreword vii 1 Abstract 1 2 Estimation of biological control
    [Show full text]
  • Acute and Longterm Effects of Selective Insecticides on Micromus
    Australian Journal of Entomology (2010) 49, 160–165 Acute and long-term effects of selective insecticides on Micromus tasmaniae Walker (Neuroptera: Hemerobiidae), Coccinella transversalis F. (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) and Nabis kinbergii Reuter (Hemiptera: Miridae)aen_743 160..165 Peter G Cole,1* Anna R Cutler,1 Amanda J Kobelt2† and Paul A Horne1 1IPM Technologies Pty Ltd, PO Box 560, Hurstbridge, Vic. 3099, Australia. 2Department of Primary Industries, 621 Burwood Hwy, Knoxfield, Vic. 3180, Australia. Abstract The impacts of six selective insecticides on three predatory insect species, Tasman’s lacewing (Micro- mus tasmaniae), the transverse ladybird (Coccinella transversalis) and the damsel bug (Nabis kinbergii), were tested by acute and long-term bioassay. Acute bioassays measured mortality 72 h after exposure to wet sprays and dry residues, and long-term bioassays measured mortality and sublethal effects over a generation. The acute bioassays were not consistently reliable indicators of the harmfulness of insecticides that did not induce high short-term mortality. Pymetrozine caused very low mortality (Յ20%) to the larvae of C. transversalis in acute tests, but the long-term test showed that 97.6% of individuals were killed before maturity. Similarly, pirimicarb adversely affected reproduction of C. transversalis even though there was only a minor effect on short-term mortality. Imidacloprid caused low mortality (Յ20%) of M. tasmaniae in acute tests, but reproductive capacity was reduced by about two-thirds in long-term tests. Therefore, in some cases, acute bioassays were poor indicators of overall effects of insecticides on populations. Our results support previous studies by other authors that long-term mortality and sublethal effects of selective insecticides on predatory species need to be determined to facilitate their effective use alongside biological control in integrated pest management programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Preempting the Arrival of the Brown Marmorated Stink Bug, Halyomorpha Halys: Biological Control Options for Australia
    insects Article Preempting the Arrival of the Brown Marmorated Stink Bug, Halyomorpha halys: Biological Control Options for Australia Valerie Caron 1,* , Tania Yonow 1, Cate Paull 2, Elijah J. Talamas 3, Gonzalo A. Avila 4 and Kim A. Hoelmer 5 1 CSIRO, Health and Biosecurity, Black Mountain, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia; [email protected] 2 CSIRO, Agriculture and Food, Dutton Park, QLD 4102, Australia; [email protected] 3 Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry, Bureau of Entomology, Nematology and Plant Pathology, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA; [email protected] 4 The New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited, Auckland 1025, New Zealand; [email protected] 5 USDA, Agriculture Research Service, Beneficial Insects Introduction Research Unit, Newark, DE 19713, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-02-6218-3475 Simple Summary: The brown marmorated stink bug Halyomorpha halys (Stål) (Hemiptera: Pentato- midae) is native to Northeast Asia, but has become a serious invasive species in North America and Europe, causing major economic damage to crops. Halyomorpha halys has not established itself in Australia, but it has been intercepted several times at the border, therefore future incursions and establishment are likely. There are few control options for this species and biological control may be a useful management method in Australia. This study summarizes the literature on natural enemies of H. halys in its native and invaded ranges and prioritizes potential biological control agents that could be suitable for use in Australia. The results show two egg parasitoid species as the Citation: Caron, V.; Yonow, T.; Paull, best candidates: Trissolcus japonicus (Ashmead) and Trissolcus mitsukurii (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera: C.; Talamas, E.J.; Avila, G.A.; Hoelmer, Scelionidae).
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team
    Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Biological Control ASSESSING HOST RANGES FOR PARASITOIDS AND PREDATORS USED FOR CLASSICAL BIOLOGICAL CONTROL: A GUIDE TO BEST PRACTICE R. G. Van Driesche and R. Reardon, Editors Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team—Morgantown, West Virginia United States Forest FHTET-2004-03 Department of Service September 2004 Agriculture __________________________________ ASSESSING HOST RANGES OF PARASITOIDS AND PREDATORS CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION PREDICTING HOST RANGES OF PARASITOIDS AND PREDACIOUS INSECTS—WHAT ARE THE ISSUES? R. G. Van Driesche Department of Plant, Soil and Insect Science: Division of Entomology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003 USA [email protected] GOALS FOR HOST RANGE TESTING Estimating the likely nontarget impacts of agents released to suppress invasive plants has been legally required, to one degree or another, for many decades. Similar predictions were not formally required for introductions of parasitoids or predators of pest arthropods. That is now beginning to change. This book has as its goal an exploration of how such estimates can best be made. This requires overcoming a series of problems, some logistical, some technical, some tied to an unclear theoretical framework for the activity. In this book, the editors and authors have tried to address many of these needs, in some chapters as essays on important tasks that need to be achieved, in other chapters as case history explorations of how the tasks were done in particular cases. This book will not be the final answer, but we hope it might propel the search for such an answer along. LEGAL REQUIREMENTS Whether or not predicting the host ranges of parasitoids and predators is legally required varies among countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team
    Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Biological Control ASSESSING HOST RANGES FOR PARASITOIDS AND PREDATORS USED FOR CLASSICAL BIOLOGICAL CONTROL: A GUIDE TO BEST PRACTICE R. G. Van Driesche, T. Murray, and R. Reardon (Eds.) Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team—Morgantown, West Virginia United States Forest FHTET-2004-03 Department of Service September 2004 Agriculture he Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team (FHTET) was created in 1995 Tby the Deputy Chief for State and Private Forestry, USDA, Forest Service, to develop and deliver technologies to protect and improve the health of American forests. This book was published by FHTET as part of the technology transfer series. http://www.fs.fed.us/foresthealth/technology/ Cover photo: Syngaster lepidus Brullè—Timothy Paine, University of California, Riverside. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call 202-720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. The use of trade, firm, or corporation names in this publication is for information only and does not constitute an endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Toxicity of Insecticides and Miticides to Natural Enemies in Australian Grains: a Review
    insects Review Toxicity of Insecticides and Miticides to Natural Enemies in Australian Grains: A Review Kathy Overton 1,*, Ary A. Hoffmann 2 , Olivia L. Reynolds 1 and Paul A. Umina 1,2 1 Cesar Australia, 293 Royal Parade, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia; [email protected] (O.L.R.); [email protected] (P.A.U.) 2 Pest and Environmental Adaptation Research Group, School of BioSciences, Bio21 Institute, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Simple Summary: Controlling invertebrate pests in crop fields using chemicals has been the main management strategy within the Australian grains industry for decades. However, chemical use can have unintended effects on natural enemies, which can play a key role in suppressing and controlling pest outbreaks within crops. We undertook a literature review of studies that have conducted chemical toxicity testing against arthropod natural enemies relevant to the Australian grains industry to examine trends and highlight research gaps and priorities. Most toxicity trials have been conducted in the laboratory, with few at larger, and hence, industry-relevant scales. Researchers have used a variety of methods when conducting toxicity testing, making it difficult to compare within and across different species of natural enemies. Furthermore, we found many gaps in testing, leading to unknown toxicity effects for several key natural enemies, some of which are economically important predators and parasitoids. Through our review, we make several key recommendations for future areas of research that could arm farmers and their advisors with the knowledge they need to make informed decisions when it comes to controlling crop pests.
    [Show full text]
  • Hemiptera: Heteroptera)
    ACTA ENTOMOLOGICA MUSEI NATIONALIS PRAGAE Published 30.vi.2010 Volume 50(1), pp. 33–44 ISSN 0374-1036 An annotated catalogue of the Iranian Nabidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) Hassan GHAHARI1), Rauno E. LINNAVUORI2), Pierre MOULET3) & Hadi OSTOVAN4) 1) Department of Agriculture, Islamic Azad University, Shahre Rey Branch, Tehran, Iran; e-mail: [email protected] 2) Saukkokuja 10, FIN-21220 Raisio, Finland; e-mail: rauno.linnavuori@kolumbus.fi 3) Museum Requien, 67 rue Joseph Vernet, F-84000 Avignon, France; e-mail: [email protected] 4) Department of Entomology, Fars Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht, Iran; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. The Iranian fauna of the Nabidae is summarized in this paper. In total, four genera (Alloeorhynchus Fieber, 1860, Himacerus Wolff, 1811, Nabis Lat- reille, 1802 and Prostemma Laporte, 1832), 22 species and subspecies are listed from Iran. Three of these species are new for the Iranian fauna: Nabis (Nabicula) fl avomarginatus Scholtz, 1847, Nabis (Nabis) rugosus (Linnaeus, 1758) and Prostemma carduelis Dohrn, 1858. Key words. Heteroptera, Nabidae, catalogue, Iran, Palaearctic Region Introduction Damsel bugs (Heteroptera: Nabidae) have a worldwide distribution and include approxi- mately 400 species in about 20 genera (KERZHNER 1981, 1996; KERZHNER & HENRY 2008). All known species are predators of adults and larvae of various stages and groups of insects, e.g., aphids, leafhoppers and lepidopteran eggs and young caterpillars. They may be commonly found on low herbaceous vegetation, shrubs and grasses (LATTIN 1989). They have not been used as biological control agents but are considered benefi cial in natural biological control. The classifi cation of the Nabidae is conjectural.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nabidae (Insecta, Hemiptera, Heteroptera) of Argentina
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 333: 1–30 (2013) The Nabidae( Insecta, Hemiptera, Heteroptera) of Argentina 1 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.333.5084 RESEARCH articLE www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research The Nabidae (Insecta, Hemiptera, Heteroptera) of Argentina Marcela Cornelis1, María C. Coscarón2 1 Universidad Nacional de La Pampa. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Uruguay 151 L6300CLB, Santa Rosa, La Pampa. Argentina 2 Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo. División Entomología. Paseo del Bosque s/n 1900, La Plata, Buenos Aires. Argentina Corresponding author: Marcela Cornelis ([email protected]), María C. Coscarón ([email protected]) Academic editor: Thomas Henry | Received 8 March 2013 | Accepted 14 August 2013 | Published 20 September 2013 Citation: Cornelis M, Coscarón MC (2013) The Nabidae (Insecta, Hemiptera, Heteroptera) of Argentina. ZooKeys 333: 1–30. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.333.5084 Abstract In Argentina, five genera and 14 species are recorded in the subfamilies Prostemmatinae and Nabinae: Hoplistoscelis sordidus Reuter, Lasiomerus constrictus Champion, Metatropiphorus alvarengai Reuter, Nabis argentinus Meyer-Dür, Nabis (Tropiconabis) capsiformis Germar, Nabis faminei Stål, Nabis paranensis Har- ris, Nabis punctipennis Blanchard, Nabis roripes Stål, Nabis setricus Harris, Nabis tandilensis Berg, Pagasa (Pagasa) costalis Reuter, Pagasa (Lampropagasa) fuscipennis Reuter and Pagasa (Pagasa) signatipennis Reuter. Keywords Nabidae, key, Argentina, taxonomy, distribution Introduction The Nabidae, often called damsel bugs, are a small group of predatory insects of vari- ous shapes and colours, ranging from 5 to 15 mm. In the Neotropical catalogue, Volpi and Coscarón (2010) and Coscarón and Volpi (2013) provided a summary of the classification of the group and an exhaustive intro- duction to the literature.
    [Show full text]