DOCSLIB.ORG

09-07-20 Judgement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
09-07-20 Judgement IT-98-32/1-T 12910 D12910 - D12551 20 July 2009 MC UNITED NATIONS Case No. IT-9832/1T International Tribunal for the Prosecutionof Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International HumanitarianLaw Committedin Date: 20July 2009 the Territoryof the former Yugoslavia since 1991 Original: English IN TRIAL CHAMBER III Before: Judge Patrick Robinson, Presiding Judge Christine Van den Wyngaert Judge PedroDavid Registrar: Mr. John Hocking Judgement of: 20July2009 PROSECUTOR v. MILAN LUKIĆ SREDOJE LUKIĆ PUBLIC JUDGEMENT The Office of the Prosecutor Mr. Dermot Groome Mr. Frédéric Ossogo Ms. Laurie Sartorio Mr. StevanCole Ms. Francesca Mazzocco Counsel for the Accused Mr. JasonAlaridandMr. DraganIvetić for MilanLukić Mr. ÐuroČepić andMr. Jens Dieckmannfor Sredoje Lukić 12909 I. INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................9 A. The Accused Milan Luki}.........................................................................................................9 B. The Accused Sredoje Luki}....................................................................................................10 C. Charges against Milan Luki} and Sredoje Luki}.................................................................11 D. Evidentiarymatters ................................................................................................................13 1. Contempt allegations raised by the Prosecution .......................................................................... 13 2. Alibi evidence.............................................................................................................................. 14 (a) The nature of an alibi generally.............................................................................................. 14 (b) Notice of alibi defence ........................................................................................................... 15 (c) Burden ofproof ...................................................................................................................... 16 3. In-court identification .................................................................................................................. 17 4. Protective measures ..................................................................................................................... 18 5. Evidence of non-indicted crimes ................................................................................................. 18 II. FACTS .........................................................................................................................................19 A. Background..............................................................................................................................19 B. Vi{egrad Serb Police ...............................................................................................................25 C. White Eagles and other paramilitaryunits ..........................................................................27 1. Milan Lukić and Sredoje Lukić– membership of the White Eagles or “Avengers”.................... 29 2. Factual finding ............................................................................................................................. 31 D. Evidence of existence of an armed conflict ...........................................................................31 E. The Drinariver incident .........................................................................................................37 1. Prosecution case........................................................................................................................... 37 (a) Events..................................................................................................................................... 37 (b) Prosecution identification evidence ....................................................................................... 47 (i) VG032....................................................................................................................................... 47 (ii) VG014...................................................................................................................................... 48 (iii) Mitar Vasiljevi}....................................................................................................................... 49 (iv) VG079 ..................................................................................................................................... 50 2. Defence case ................................................................................................................................ 50 (a) Challenges to the Prosecution case ........................................................................................ 50 (i) Testimony of Radomir Sim{i}................................................................................................... 50 (ii) Evidence of Professor Vera Folnegovi}-[malc in the Vasiljevi} case..................................... 51 (iii) Evidence of Professor Linda LaGrange .................................................................................. 52 (b) Milan Luki}’s alibi................................................................................................................. 54 3. Prosecution alibi rebuttal evidence .............................................................................................. 63 (a) Prosecution allegations of interference with Milan Luki} Defence witnesses....................... 63 (i) Submissions............................................................................................................................... 63 (ii) Evidence of Hamdija Vilić....................................................................................................... 64 (iii) Evidence of MLD10................................................................................................................ 65 (iv) Evidence of VG146................................................................................................................. 66 (v) Challenges to the evidence of MLD1....................................................................................... 68 (b) Alibi rebuttal evidence of VG063.......................................................................................... 69 (c) Exhibits P147, P149 and P313 ............................................................................................... 71 4. Factual findings in relation to the Drina river incident................................................................ 71 (a) Defence challenge of the occurrence of the Drina river incident........................................... 71 (b) Prosecution evidence concerning Milan Luki}’s acts and conduct on 7 June 1992 .............. 72 (c) Prosecution evidence concerning Milan Luki}’s presence on 7 June 1992 ........................... 74 (d) Defence evidence concerning Milan Luki}’s alibi................................................................. 76 (e) Prosecution alibi rebuttal evidence......................................................................................... 82 (f) Finding on Milan Luki}’s presence, acts and conduct on 7 June 1992 .................................. 83 F. The Vardafactoryincident.....................................................................................................83 1. Prosecution case........................................................................................................................... 83 (a) Events..................................................................................................................................... 83 (b) John Clark .............................................................................................................................. 91 (c) Prosecution identification evidence........................................................................................ 92 2. Defence case ................................................................................................................................ 96 Case No. IT98-32/1T 2 20July 2009 12908 (a) Defence challenge of Prosecution investigations, including of the Varda factory incident... 96 (b) Defence evidence concerning the victims ofthe Varda factory incident............................... 98 (c) Milan Luki}’s alibi................................................................................................................. 99 3. Prosecution alibi rebuttal evidence .............................................................................................. 99 (a) VG131 .................................................................................................................................... 99 (b) VG133 and VG141 .............................................................................................................. 100 4. Factual findings in relation to the Varda factory incident ......................................................... 105 (a) Defence challenge of Prosecution investigations, including of the Varda factory incident. 105 (b) Weight to be placed on witness evidence ............................................................................ 106 (c) Date ofthe incident .............................................................................................................. 108 (d) Prosecution evidence concerning Milan
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Draft Confidential RUF Apppeal Judgment
    Bosna i Hercegovina Босна и Херцеговина Sud Bosne i Hercegovine Суд Босна и Херцеговина Predmet br.: S1 1 K 011128 12 KrI Datum: objavljivanja 28.10.2014. godine pismenog otpravka 16.02.2015. godine Pred sudskim vijećem u sastavu: sudija Jesenković Vesna, predsjednik vijeća sudija Maksumić Šaban sudija Gluhajić Staniša PREDMET TUŽILAŠTVA BOSNE I HERCEGOVINE protiv Milisavljević Predraga Pantelić Miloša Tasić Ljubomira PRESUDA Tužilac Tužilaštva Bosne i Hercegovine: Muratbegović Dževad Branilac Milisavljević Predraga: Mihajlović Dragiša, advokat iz Vlasenice Branilac Pantelić Miloša: Rubež Nenad, advokat iz Zvornika Branilac Tasić Ljubomira: Beganović Žutić Mirsada, advokat iz Sarajeva 1 S1 1 K 0011128 12 Krl 28.10.2014. I Z R E K A I. K R I V I Č N I P O S T U P A K ...................................................................................... 11 A. O P T U Ž N I C A I G L A V N I P R E T R E S ............................................................. 11 B. P R O C E S N E O D L U K E ...................................................................................... 13 (a) Odluka o isključenju javnosti za dio pretresa.................................................. 13 (b) Svjedoci pod mjerama zaštite .......................................................................... 13 (c) Odluka o usvajanju prijedloga Tužilaštva za prihvatanje utvrđenih činjenica u postupcima pred MKSJ ....................................................................................... 14 (d) Izmjena redoslijeda izvođenja dokaza (član 261.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissertation Irene Schrotenboer Final
    Tilburg University Dynamics of payments, conflict and economic activity Lubberman-Schrotenboer, I.G. Publication date: 2014 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication in Tilburg University Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Lubberman-Schrotenboer, I. G. (2014). Dynamics of payments, conflict and economic activity: Case studies of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia. CentER, Center for Economic Research. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 28. sep. 2021 Dynamics of payments, conflict and economic activity Case studies of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia Dynamics of payments, conflict and economic activity Case studies of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan Tilburg University op gezag van de rector magnificus, prof. dr. Ph. Eijlander, in het openbaar te verdedigen ten overstaan van een door het college voor promoties aangewezen commissie in de aula van de Universiteit op maandag 1 december 2014 om 10:15 uur door Irene Geessien Lubberman-Schrotenboer geboren op 23 mei 1977 te Sneek.
    [Show full text]
  • Kontinuitet Genocida Nad Bošnjacima U Višegradu: Studija Slučaja Selo Barimo
    SAGLEDAVANJA KONTINUITET GENOCIDA NAD BOŠNJACIMA U VIŠEGRADU: STUDIJA SLUČAJA SELO BARIMO Ermin KUKA UDK 3221:141]:28 341.322.5(497.6 Višegrad)”1992/1995” DOI: Sažetak: Ideologija, politika i praksa stvaranja etnički čiste srpske države, tzv. “Velike Srbije”, nalazila se u fokusu interesiranja velikosrpske ideologije, još od vremena s kraja XVIII stoljeća. Ta i takva ideologija je figurirala s idejom stvaranja etnički čistih teritorija na kojima bi isključivo i samo živjeli Srbi, a koja je podrazumijevala i teritoriju Bosne i Hercegovine. Za druge i drugačije, pa čak niti za nacionalne manjine, u tim zamislima nema mjesta. Takav projekt je bilo jedino moguće ostvariti putem nasilja, tj. kroz vršenje strašnih i užasnih zločina nad nesrbima, prije svega nad Bošnjacima u Bosni i Hercegovini, uključujući i zločin genocida. Počev još od Prvog svjetskog rata, zatim Drugog svjetskog rata, te u vremenu posljednje agresije na Republiku Bosnu i Hercegovinu u periodu 1992–1995. godine, evidentna je otvorena i neskrivena namjera stvaranja tzv. “Velike Srbije”. Ona je obilježena, prije svega, kontinuiranim vršenjem brojnih oblika zločina protiv čovječnosti i međunarodnog prava nad Bošnjacima, uključujući i zločin genocida. Posebno je to bilo izraženo na području Istočne Bosne, uključujući i grad Višegrad. Prezentirana studija slučaja na primjeru sela Barimo, kao istraživane mikrolokacije, jasan je pokazatelj kontinuiteta zločina genocida nad Bošnjacima, ali i namjere zločinaca o stvaranju etnički čistih teritorija na području Višegrada. Radi se, dakle, o kontinuitetu namjere i nastojanja velikosrpskih ideologa o uklanjanju svih Bošnjaka s područja Istočne Bosne i grada Višegrada, uključujući i selo Barimo. Zaključak je da je selo Barimo jasan pokazatelj kontinuiteta genocidnih namjera na području Višegrada, ali i borbe Bošnjaka da, poslije svakog stradanja, nastoje opstati na tim prostorima, na kojima su vjekovima živjeli.
    [Show full text]
  • Bosna I Hercegovina FEDERACIJA BOSNE I HERCEGOVINE
    Bosna i Hercegovina FEDERACIJA BOSNE I Bosnia and Herzegovina FEDERATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA FEDERAL MINISTRY OF HERCEGOVINE FEDERALNO MINISTARSTVO DISPLACED PERSONS AND REFUGEES RASELJENIH OSOBA I IZBJEGLICA Broj: 03-36-2-334-5022/19 Sarajevo, 20.05.2020.godine Na osnovu člana 56. Zakona o organizaciji organa uprave u Federaciji BiH („Službene novine Federacije BiH“ broj: 35/05), a u vezi sa objavljenim Javnim pozivom za program pomoći održivog povratka „Podrška zapošljavanju/samozapošljavanju povratnika u poljoprivredi u period 2020. i 2021.godine“, broj: 03-36-2-334-1/19 od 09.12.2019. godine, u skladu sa Procedurama za izbor korisnika za „Program podrške zapošljavanju/samozapošljavanju povratnika u poljoprivredi u periodu 2020. i 2021.godine“, broj: 03-36-2-334-2/19 od 12.12.2019, na prijedlog Komisije za razmatranje prijava po Javnom pozivu, imenovane Rješenjem ministra, broj: 03-36-2-334-3/19 od 12.12.2019.godine, federalni ministar raseljenih osoba i izbjeglica, donosi ODLUKU O UTVRĐIVANJU RANG LISTE POTENCIJALNIH KORISNIKA za program pomoći održivog povratka „Podrška zapošljavanju/samozapošljavanju povratnika u poljoprivredi u periodu 2020. i 2021.godine“ za entitet Republika srpska I Ovom odlukom vrši se rangiranje potencijalnih korisnika pomoći na osnovu ispunjavanja/neispunjavanja općih i posebnih kriterija, odnosno ukupnog broja bodova. II Rang lista potencijalnih korisnika pomoći koji ispunjavaju opće kriterije iz Javnog poziva raspoređenih prema opštinama i programima pomoći kako slijedi: Regija Banja Luka Banja Luka- Mehanizacija RB IME /ime oca/ PREZIME ADRESA GRAD/OPĆINA PROGRAM POMOĆI NAMJENA BODOVI Ivanjska Pezić 1 Pezić/Ilija/Mato Banja Luka 1. Mehanizacija Traktor 40-45 KS polje 60 Čelinac- Finansijska sredstva Čelinac Novac-mašine, oprema 1 Nuhić (Selim) Mujo V.Mišića 44 7.
    [Show full text]
  • VIVERE MILITARE EST from Populus to Emperors - Living on the Frontier Volume I
    VIVERE MILITARE EST From Populus to Emperors - Living on the Frontier Volume I BELGRADE 2018 VIVERE MILITARE EST From Populus to Emperors - Living on the Frontier INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY MONOGRAPHIES No. 68/1 VIVERE MILITARE EST From Populus to Emperors - Living on the Frontier VOM LU E I Belgrade 2018 PUBLISHER PROOFREADING Institute of Archaeology Dave Calcutt Kneza Mihaila 35/IV Ranko Bugarski 11000 Belgrade Jelena Vitezović http://www.ai.ac.rs Tamara Rodwell-Jovanović [email protected] Rajka Marinković Tel. +381 11 2637-191 GRAPHIC DESIGN MONOGRAPHIES 68/1 Nemanja Mrđić EDITOR IN CHIEF PRINTED BY Miomir Korać DigitalArt Beograd Institute of Archaeology, Belgrade PRINTED IN EDITORS 500 copies Snežana Golubović Institute of Archaeology, Belgrade COVER PAGE Nemanja Mrđić Tabula Traiana, Iron Gate Institute of Archaeology, Belgrade REVIEWERS EDITORiaL BOARD Diliana Angelova, Departments of History of Art Bojan Ðurić, University of Ljubljana, Faculty and History Berkeley University, Berkeley; Vesna of Arts, Ljubljana; Cristian Gazdac, Faculty of Dimitrijević, Faculty of Philosophy, University History and Philosophy University of Cluj-Napoca of Belgrade, Belgrade; Erik Hrnčiarik, Faculty of and Visiting Fellow at the University of Oxford; Philosophy and Arts, Trnava University, Trnava; Gordana Jeremić, Institute of Archaeology, Belgrade; Kristina Jelinčić Vučković, Institute of Archaeology, Miomir Korać, Institute of Archaeology, Belgrade; Zagreb; Mario Novak, Institute for Anthropological Ioan Piso, Faculty of History and Philosophy Research,
    [Show full text]
  • COLD ARMS Zoran Markov Dragutin Petrović
    COLD ARMS Zoran Markov Dragutin Petrović MUZEUL BANATULUI TIMIŞOARA 2012 PREFACE Authors of the catalog and exhibition: Zoran Markov, Curator, Banat Museum of Timisoara Dragutin Petrović, Museum - Consultant, The City Museum of Vršac Associates at the exhibition: Vesna Stankov, Etnologist, Senior Curator Dragana Lepir, Historian Reviewer: “Regional Centre for the Heritage of Banat — Concordia” is set adopted a draft strategy for long-term research, protection and pro- Eng. Branko Bogdanović up with funds provided by the EU and the Municipality of Vršac, motion of the cultural heritage of Banat, where Banat means a ge- Catalog design: as a cross-border cooperation project between the City Museum ographical region, which politically belongs to Romania, Hungary Javor Rašajski of Vršac (CMV) and Banat Museum in Timisoara (MBT). In im- and Serbia. Photos: plementation of this project, the reconstruction of the building of All the parts of the Banat region have been inextricably linked Milan Šepecan Concordia has a fundamental role. It will house the Regional Centre by cultural relations since the earliest prehistoric times. Owing to Ivan Kalnak and also be a place for the permanent museum exhibition. its specific geographical position, distinctive features and the criss- Technical editor: The main objective of establishing the Regional Centre in crossing rivers Tisza, Tamis and Karas, as the ways used for spread- Ivan Kalnak Concordia is cross-border cooperation between all institutions of ing influence by a number of different cultures, identified in archae- COLD ARMS culture and science in the task of production of a strategic plan ological research, the area of Banat represents today an inexhaust- and creation of best conditions for the preservation and presenta- ible source of information about cultural and historic ties.
    [Show full text]
  • The World Factbook Europe :: Serbia Introduction :: Serbia Background
    The World Factbook Europe :: Serbia Introduction :: Serbia Background: The Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes was formed in 1918; its name was changed to Yugoslavia in 1929. Various paramilitary bands resisted Nazi Germany's occupation and division of Yugoslavia from 1941 to 1945, but fought each other and ethnic opponents as much as the invaders. The military and political movement headed by Josip "TITO" Broz (Partisans) took full control of Yugoslavia when German and Croatian separatist forces were defeated in 1945. Although communist, TITO's new government and his successors (he died in 1980) managed to steer their own path between the Warsaw Pact nations and the West for the next four and a half decades. In 1989, Slobodan MILOSEVIC became president of the Republic of Serbia and his ultranationalist calls for Serbian domination led to the violent breakup of Yugoslavia along ethnic lines. In 1991, Croatia, Slovenia, and Macedonia declared independence, followed by Bosnia in 1992. The remaining republics of Serbia and Montenegro declared a new Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY) in April 1992 and under MILOSEVIC's leadership, Serbia led various military campaigns to unite ethnic Serbs in neighboring republics into a "Greater Serbia." These actions were ultimately unsuccessful and led to the signing of the Dayton Peace Accords in 1995. MILOSEVIC retained control over Serbia and eventually became president of the FRY in 1997. In 1998, an ethnic Albanian insurgency in the formerly autonomous Serbian province of Kosovo provoked a Serbian counterinsurgency campaign that resulted in massacres and massive expulsions of ethnic Albanians living in Kosovo. The MILOSEVIC government's rejection of a proposed international settlement led to NATO's bombing of Serbia in the spring of 1999, to the withdrawal of Serbian military and police forces from Kosovo in June 1999, and to the stationing of a NATO-led force in Kosovo to provide a safe and secure environment for the region's ethnic communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Appeal Judgement, Para
    UNITED NATIONS International Tribunal for the Case No. IT-98-32/1-A Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of Date: 4 December 2012 International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia since 1991 Original: English IN THE APPEALS CHAMBER Before: Judge Mehmet Güney, Presiding Judge Carmel Agius Judge Fausto Pocar Judge Liu Daqun Judge Howard Morrison Registrar: Mr. John Hocking Judgement of: 4 December 2012 PROSECUTOR v. MILAN LUKIĆ SREDOJE LUKIĆ PUBLIC JUDGEMENT The Office of the Prosecutor: Mr. Peter Kremer, QC Ms. Virginie Monchy Mr. Matthias Schuster Mr. Matthew Gillett Counsel for Milan Luki}: Counsel for Sredoje Luki}: Mr. Tomislav Vi{nji} Mr. \uro ^epi} Mr. Dragan Iveti} Mr. Jens Dieckmann Prof. G.G.J. Knoops, as Legal Consultant CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1 A. BACKGROUND ..............................................................................................................................1 B. THE APPEALS ...............................................................................................................................3 C. APPEAL HEARING .........................................................................................................................4 II. STANDARD OF REVIEW ................................................................................... 5 III. ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL ................ 8 A. INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Pregledati Cjelokupno Izdanje BAŠTINA 4. SJEVEROISTOČNE BOSNE
    BAŠTINA SJEVEROISTOČNE BOSNE BROJ 4. 2011. ČASOPIS ZA BAŠTINU, KULTURNO-HISTORIJSKO I PRIRODNO NASLIJEĐE Northeast Bosnia's Heritage Number 4, 2011. Heritage magazine, Culture-historical and natural heritage Glavni i odgovorni urednik: doc. dr. sc. Edin Mutapčić Urednik u redakciji: mr. sc. Rusmir Djedović Članovi redakcije: Benjamin Bajrektarević, prof., direktor Zavoda; prof. dr. sc. Amira Turbić- Hadžagić; prof. dr. sc. Ivan Balta; Samir Halilović, prof., doc. dr. sc. Adnan Tufekčić, doc. dr. sc. Izet Šabotić; doc. dr. sc. Omer Hamzić; Munisa Kovačević, prof. (sekretar) Izdavač: JU Zavod za zaštitu i korištenje kulturno-historijskog i prirodnog naslijeđa Tuzlanskog kantona Za izdavača: Benjamin Bajrektarević, direktor Zavoda Naslovna strana: Novoformirana nekropola stećaka na Rajskom jezeru kod Živinica ISSN 1986-6895 Tuzla, 2012. SADRŽAJ PROŠLOST Edin Šaković, prof. Rekognosciranje lokaliteta Grabovik/Zaketuša (Općina Srebrenik) ......... 10 Dr. Thomas Butler Bogumili – kulturni sinkretizam ............................................................................. 20 Mensura Mujkanović, prof. Izrada proizvoda od zemlje u okolini Tešnja od neolita do savremenog doba .................................................................................................................................... 24 Edhem Omerović Pisani tragovi o selu Goduš ........................................................................................ 38 Almir Mušović, prof. Realizacija školskog projekta „Neolit u Tuzli“ .........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • LOKACIJE BIRAČKIH MJESTA - Lokalni Izbori 2020
    LOKACIJE BIRAČKIH MJESTA - Lokalni izbori 2020. godine Na označenim KOD biračkim mjestima, Vrsta Birackog KOD Grad/Opština Birackog Naziv Birackog Mjesta Lokacija Birackog Mjesta svoje biračko pravo Mjesta Mjesta mogu ostvariti i birači koji glasaju: 001 VELIKA KLADUŠA 001A001 REDOVNO VELIKA KLADUŠA 1 PRVA OSNOVNA ŠKOLA LIČNO/OSOBNO 001 VELIKA KLADUŠA 001A002A REDOVNO VELIKA KLADUŠA 2A GIMNAZIJA 001 VELIKA KLADUŠA 001A002B REDOVNO VELIKA KLADUŠA 2B GIMNAZIJA 001 VELIKA KLADUŠA 001A003 REDOVNO VELIKA KLADUŠA 3 GIMNAZIJA 001 VELIKA KLADUŠA 001A004 REDOVNO VELIKA KLADUŠA 4 GIMNAZIJA 001 VELIKA KLADUŠA 001A005 REDOVNO VELIKA KLADUŠA 5 DRUGA SREDNJA ŠKOLA 001 VELIKA KLADUŠA 001A006 REDOVNO VELIKA KLADUŠA 6 OŠ 25. NOVEMBAR 001 VELIKA KLADUŠA 001A007 REDOVNO ZAGRAD DRUGA SREDNJA ŠKOLA 001 VELIKA KLADUŠA 001A008A REDOVNO TRNOVIA OŠ TRNOVI 001 VELIKA KLADUŠA 001A008B REDOVNO TRNOVIB OŠ TRNOVI 001 VELIKA KLADUŠA 001A009A REDOVNO POLJEA OŠ POLJE 001 VELIKA KLADUŠA 001A009B REDOVNO POLJEB OŠ POLJE 001 VELIKA KLADUŠA 001A010 REDOVNO GRAHOVO OŠ GRAHOVO Na označenim KOD biračkim mjestima, Vrsta Birackog KOD Grad/Opština Birackog Naziv Birackog Mjesta Lokacija Birackog Mjesta svoje biračko pravo Mjesta Mjesta mogu ostvariti i birači koji glasaju: 001 VELIKA KLADUŠA 001A011 REDOVNO DONJA VIDOVSKA OŠ DONJA VIDOVSKA 001 VELIKA KLADUŠA 001A012A REDOVNO ŠUMATACA OŠ ŠUMATAC 001 VELIKA KLADUŠA 001A012B REDOVNO ŠUMATACB OŠ ŠUMATAC 001 VELIKA KLADUŠA 001A013 REDOVNO ŠABIĆI PRIVATNI PROSTOR ŠABIĆ SEAD 001 VELIKA KLADUŠA 001A014A REDOVNO KUDIĆIA OŠ KUDIĆI 001 VELIKA
    [Show full text]
  • In the Name of Bosnia and Herzegovina!
    SUD BOSNE I HERCEGOVINE Ref number: X-KRl06/165 Sarajevo. 24 August 2007 IN THE NAME OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA! The Court of Bosnia and Her::egovina. SectiOIl I for War Crimes, silling in the Panel composed of JI/dge Hillllo Vucinie, as the Presiding Judge, Judge Shireel1 Avis Fishel' and Judge Paul M. Brillllal1, as lIIembers of the Panel, including the Legal Associate Oienana Oeljkii: Blagojevie as the Record-lCIker. in the crimillal case against the accused Nellad Tanaskovie, for the criminal offense of Crimes against Humanity in violation of Al'licle 172 (I) (a), (d), (e), (f). (gJ, (17) and (k) ill conj/mc/ioll with Article 180 (I) of the Crimi/wi Code of Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH CC). upon the IndictmeJII of the Prosecutor's Office of BiH Ref number KT-RZ-146/05 dated 29 Septelllber 2006, after (he public main (rial. which \Vas port~v closed to the public. in the presence of the Prosecutor of the ProseCutor's Office 0/ BiH, David Sch1l'endimon, Ihe accused Nenad Tanaskovic ill person and Itis Defellse COl/llsel Dragan Borov[;onil1, ollorney-ot-Iall' ,/i'om Sokolac, and Radmila Radosav/jevie, allol'l1ey-at-lall' /1'0111 Visegrad followillg the deliberGlion and voting, on 24 August 2007 rendered and public~)1 annol/nced the/ol/owing: VERDICT THE ACCUSED: NENAD TANASKOVIC a/k/a "Neso", SOI7 o/Momir and SICJ/1ojka, bo1'/7 011 20 November 1961 in the vii/age 0/ DOI?ia L[jeska, Visegrad "4unicipality. Personal Idel1fijicClliol7 Number (JMBG): 2011961133652. Serb. citizen 0/ BiN.
    [Show full text]
  • Univerza V Novi Gorici Fakulteta Za Podiplomski Študij
    UNIVERZA V NOVI GORICI FAKULTETA ZA PODIPLOMSKI ŠTUDIJ POVIJEST DINARSKOG KRŠA NA PRIMJERU POPOVA POLJA ZGODOVINA POZNAVANJA DINARSKEGA KRASA NA PRIMERU POPOVEGA POLJA DISERTACIJA Ivo Lučić Mentorja: prof. dr. Andrej Kranjc prof. dr. Petar Milanović Nova Gorica, 2009 Izjavljujem da je ova disertacija u cijelosti moje autorsko djelo. Hereby I declare this thesis is entirely my author work. Izvadak Povijest poznavanja Dinarskog krša na primjeru Popova polja (Pokušaj holističke interpretacije krša uz pomoć karstologije, povijesti okoliša i kulturnog krajolika) Tekst predstavlja rezultat analize poznavanja, upotrebe i obilježavanja jednog istaknutog krškog krajolika, temeljeći se isključivo na uvidu u dostupnu literaturu i pisane izvore. Te tri vrste odnosa u značajnoj mjeri su povezane sa znanstvenim područjima: poznavanje s prirodnim znanostima, upotreba s tehničkim znanostima i obilježavanje s društveno- humanističkim znanostima. Prirodoslovlje je naglašeno zastupljeno s fizičkim geoznanostima koje prodiru u Popovo polje krajem 19. stoljeća, zajedno s karstologijom. Upotreba se gotovo isključivo odvijala tradicionalnim sredstvima do sredine 20. stoljeća, prevladavajuće djelatnosti ostale su tradicionalne do početka zadnje trećine toga stoljeća, a modernizacija je rezultirala snažnom deagrarizacijom, pustošnom depopulacijom i dalekosežnim ekološkim štetama. Obilježavanje krajolika još duže je zadržalo tradicionalni pečat dubinski temeljen na mitološkim kulturnim strukturama. One su, premda uglavnom jedinstvene, kroz političku modernizaciju rezultirale još snažnijom podjelom prostora. Kulturna povijest primala je ovaj prirodno jedinstven prostor – promatran na bazičnoj razini kao Popovo polje i u najširem smislu kao Dinarski krš – kao dijelove različitih društvenih cjelina, što mu je dalo različite povijesne uloge i različite identitete. Do kraja 20. stoljeća dominantna upotreba i obilježavanje ovih prostora gotovo uopće nisu primile poruke izuzetnosti koje im je slala karstologija.
    [Show full text]