DOCSLIB.ORG

The World Factbook Europe :: Serbia Introduction :: Serbia Background

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The World Factbook Europe :: Serbia Introduction :: Serbia Background The World Factbook Europe :: Serbia Introduction :: Serbia Background: The Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes was formed in 1918; its name was changed to Yugoslavia in 1929. Various paramilitary bands resisted Nazi Germany's occupation and division of Yugoslavia from 1941 to 1945, but fought each other and ethnic opponents as much as the invaders. The military and political movement headed by Josip "TITO" Broz (Partisans) took full control of Yugoslavia when German and Croatian separatist forces were defeated in 1945. Although communist, TITO's new government and his successors (he died in 1980) managed to steer their own path between the Warsaw Pact nations and the West for the next four and a half decades. In 1989, Slobodan MILOSEVIC became president of the Republic of Serbia and his ultranationalist calls for Serbian domination led to the violent breakup of Yugoslavia along ethnic lines. In 1991, Croatia, Slovenia, and Macedonia declared independence, followed by Bosnia in 1992. The remaining republics of Serbia and Montenegro declared a new Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY) in April 1992 and under MILOSEVIC's leadership, Serbia led various military campaigns to unite ethnic Serbs in neighboring republics into a "Greater Serbia." These actions were ultimately unsuccessful and led to the signing of the Dayton Peace Accords in 1995. MILOSEVIC retained control over Serbia and eventually became president of the FRY in 1997. In 1998, an ethnic Albanian insurgency in the formerly autonomous Serbian province of Kosovo provoked a Serbian counterinsurgency campaign that resulted in massacres and massive expulsions of ethnic Albanians living in Kosovo. The MILOSEVIC government's rejection of a proposed international settlement led to NATO's bombing of Serbia in the spring of 1999, to the withdrawal of Serbian military and police forces from Kosovo in June 1999, and to the stationing of a NATO-led force in Kosovo to provide a safe and secure environment for the region's ethnic communities. FRY elections in late 2000 led to the ouster of MILOSEVIC and the installation of democratic government. In 2003, the FRY became Serbia and Montenegro, a loose federation of the two republics. Widespread violence predominantly targeting ethnic Serbs in Kosovo in March 2004 caused the international community to open negotiations on the future status of Kosovo in January 2006. In June 2006, Montenegro seceded from the federation and declared itself an independent nation. Serbia subsequently gave notice that it was the successor state to the union of Serbia and Montenegro. In February 2008, after nearly two years of inconclusive negotiations, the UN-administered province of Kosovo declared itself independent of Serbia - an action Serbia refuses to recognize. At Serbia's request, the UN General Assembly (UNGA) in October 2008 sought an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on whether Kosovo's unilateral declaration of independence was in accordance with international law. In a ruling considered unfavorable to Serbia, the ICJ issued an advisory opinion in July 2010 stating that international law did not prohibit declarations of independence. In late 2010, Serbia agreed to an EU-drafted UNGA Resolution acknowledging the ICJ's decision and calling for a new round of talks between Serbia and Kosovo, this time on practical issues rather than Kosovo's status. The EU-moderated Belgrade-Pristina dialogue began in March 2011 and was raised to the level of prime ministers in October 2012. Geography :: Serbia Location: Southeastern Europe, between Macedonia and Hungary Geographic coordinates: 44 00 N, 21 00 E Map references: Europe Area: total: 77,474 sq km country comparison to the world: 117 land: 77,474 sq km water: 0 sq km Area - comparative: slightly smaller than South Carolina Land boundaries: total: 2,026 km border countries: Bosnia and Herzegovina 302 km, Bulgaria 318 km, Croatia 241 km, Hungary 151 km, Kosovo 352 km, Macedonia 62 km, Montenegro 124 km, Romania 476 km Coastline: 0 km (landlocked) Maritime claims: none (landlocked) Climate: in the north, continental climate (cold winters and hot, humid summers with well-distributed rainfall); in other parts, continental and Mediterranean climate (relatively cold winters with heavy snowfall and hot, dry summers and autumns) Terrain: extremely varied; to the north, rich fertile plains; to the east, limestone ranges and basins; to the southeast, ancient mountains and hills Elevation extremes: lowest point: Danube and Timok Rivers 35 m highest point: Midzor 2,169 m Natural resources: oil, gas, coal, iron ore, copper, zinc, antimony, chromite, gold, silver, magnesium, pyrite, limestone, marble, salt, arable land Land use: arable land: 37.28% permanent crops: 3.41% other: 59.31% (2011) Irrigated land: 919.6 sq km (2011) Total renewable water resources: 162.2 cu km (note - includes Kosovo) (2011) Natural hazards: destructive earthquakes Environment - current issues: air pollution around Belgrade and other industrial cities; water pollution from industrial wastes dumped into the Sava which flows into the Danube Environment - international agreements: party to: Air Pollution, Biodiversity, Climate Change, Climate Change-Kyoto Protocol, Desertification, Endangered Species, Hazardous Wastes, Law of the Sea, Marine Dumping, Marine Life Conservation, Ozone Layer Protection, Ship Pollution, Wetlands signed, but not ratified: none of the selected agreements Geography - note: controls one of the major land routes from Western Europe to Turkey and the Near East People and Society :: Serbia Nationality: noun: Serb(s) adjective: Serbian Ethnic groups: Serb 82.9%, Hungarian 3.9%, Romany (Gypsy) 1.4%, Yugoslavs 1.1%, Bosniaks 1.8%, Montenegrin 0.9%, other 8% (2002 census) Languages: Serbian (official) 88.3%, Hungarian 3.8%, Bosniak 1.8%, Romany (Gypsy) 1.1%, other 4.1%, unknown 0.9% (2002 census) note: Romanian, Hungarian, Slovak, Ukrainian, and Croatian all official in Vojvodina Religions: Serbian Orthodox 85%, Catholic 5.5%, Protestant 1.1%, Muslim 3.2%, unspecified 2.6%, other, unknown, or atheist 2.6% (2002 census) Population: 7,243,007 (July 2013 est.) country comparison to the world: 99 note: does not include the population of Kosovo Age structure: 0-14 years: 14.8% (male 553,644/female 519,887) 15-24 years: 11.9% (male 442,442/female 416,698) 25-54 years: 41.7% (male 1,521,214/female 1,497,906) 55-64 years: 14.7% (male 513,282/female 554,787) 65 years and over: 16.9% (male 500,864/female 722,283) (2013 est.) Dependency ratios: total dependency ratio: 44 % youth dependency ratio: 23.4 % elderly dependency ratio: 20.7 % potential support ratio: 4.8 (2013) Median age: total: 41.7 years male: 40 years female: 43.4 years (2013 est.) Population growth rate: -0.46% (2013 est.) country comparison to the world: 223 Birth rate: 9.15 births/1,000 population (2013 est.) country comparison to the world: 206 Death rate: 13.77 deaths/1,000 population (2013 est.) country comparison to the world: 12 Net migration rate: 0 migrant(s)/1,000 population (2013 est.) country comparison to the world: 101 Urbanization: urban population: 56% of total population (2010) rate of urbanization: 0.6% annual rate of change (2010-15 est.) Major urban areas - population: BELGRADE (capital) 1.115 million (2009) Sex ratio: at birth: 1.07 male(s)/female 0-14 years: 1.07 male(s)/female 15-24 years: 1.06 male(s)/female 25-54 years: 1.01 male(s)/female 55-64 years: 0.92 male(s)/female 65 years and over: 0.69 male(s)/female total population: 0.95 male(s)/female (2013 est.) Mother's mean age at first birth: 27.2 (2010 est.) Maternal mortality rate: 12 deaths/100,000 live births (2010) country comparison to the world: 150 Infant mortality rate: total: 6.28 deaths/1,000 live births country comparison to the world: 170 male: 7.24 deaths/1,000 live births female: 5.26 deaths/1,000 live births (2013 est.) Life expectancy at birth: total population: 74.79 years country comparison to the world: 103 male: 71.94 years female: 77.82 years (2013 est.) Total fertility rate: 1.41 children born/woman (2013 est.) country comparison to the world: 202 Contraceptive prevalence rate: 60.8% (2010) Health expenditures: 10.4% of GDP (2010) country comparison to the world: 26 Physicians density: 2.04 physicians/1,000 population (2007) Hospital bed density: 5.4 beds/1,000 population (2009) Drinking water source: improved: urban: 99% of population rural: 98% of population total: 99% of population unimproved: urban: 1% of population rural: 2% of population total: 1% of population (2010 est.) Sanitation facility access: improved: urban: 96% of population rural: 88% of population total: 92% of population unimproved: urban: 4% of population rural: 12% of population total: 8% of population (2010 est.) HIV/AIDS - adult prevalence rate: 0.1% (2009 est.) country comparison to the world: 128 HIV/AIDS - people living with HIV/AIDS: 6,400 (2009 est.) country comparison to the world: 115 HIV/AIDS - deaths: fewer than 100 (2009 est.) country comparison to the world: 144 Major infectious diseases: degree of risk: intermediate food or waterborne diseases: bacterial diarrhea note: highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza has been identified in this country; it poses a negligible risk with extremely rare cases possible among US citizens who have close contact with birds (2013) Obesity - adult prevalence rate: 24.8% (2008) country comparison to the world: 63 Children under the age of 5 years underweight: 1.8% (2006) country comparison to the world: 121 Education expenditures:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dissertation Irene Schrotenboer Final
    Tilburg University Dynamics of payments, conflict and economic activity Lubberman-Schrotenboer, I.G. Publication date: 2014 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication in Tilburg University Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Lubberman-Schrotenboer, I. G. (2014). Dynamics of payments, conflict and economic activity: Case studies of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia. CentER, Center for Economic Research. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 28. sep. 2021 Dynamics of payments, conflict and economic activity Case studies of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia Dynamics of payments, conflict and economic activity Case studies of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan Tilburg University op gezag van de rector magnificus, prof. dr. Ph. Eijlander, in het openbaar te verdedigen ten overstaan van een door het college voor promoties aangewezen commissie in de aula van de Universiteit op maandag 1 december 2014 om 10:15 uur door Irene Geessien Lubberman-Schrotenboer geboren op 23 mei 1977 te Sneek.
    [Show full text]
  • Macro Report Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 4: Macro Report September 10, 2012
    Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 1 Module 4: Macro Report Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 4: Macro Report September 10, 2012 Country: Serbia Date of Election: May 6, 2012 (Parliamentary and first round presidential); May 20, 2012 - second round presidential Prepared by: Bojan Todosijević Date of Preparation: 05. 08. 2013. NOTES TO COLLABORATORS: ° The information provided in this report contributes to an important part of the CSES project. The information may be filled out by yourself, or by an expert or experts of your choice. Your efforts in providing these data are greatly appreciated! Any supplementary documents that you can provide (e.g., electoral legislation, party manifestos, electoral commission reports, media reports) are also appreciated, and may be made available on the CSES website. ° Answers should be as of the date of the election being studied. ° Where brackets [ ] appear, collaborators should answer by placing an “X” within the appropriate bracket or brackets. For example: [X] ° If more space is needed to answer any question, please lengthen the document as necessary. Data Pertinent to the Election at which the Module was Administered 1a. Type of Election [ ] Parliamentary/Legislative [X] Parliamentary/Legislative and Presidential [ ] Presidential [ ] Other; please specify: __________ 1b. If the type of election in Question 1a included Parliamentary/Legislative, was the election for the Upper House, Lower House, or both? [ X] Upper House [ ] Lower House [ ] Both [ ] Other; please specify: __________ Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 2 Module 4: Macro Report 2a. What was the party of the president prior to the most recent election, regardless of whether the election was presidential? Democratic Party (Demokratska stranka, DS) 2b.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberal Parties in Europe and Human Rights Emphasis
    LIBERAL PARTIES IN EUROPE AND HUMAN RIGHTS EMPHASIS by ŞEYMA KOÇ Submitted to the Graduate School of Social Sciences in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Sabancı University August 2020 LIBERAL PARTIES IN EUROPE AND HUMAN RIGHTS EMPHASIS Approved by: Assoc. Prof Özge Kemahlıoğlu . (Thesis Supervisor) Prof. Ali Çarkoğlu . Asst. Prof. Mert Moral . Date of Approval: August 5, 2020 ŞEYMA KOÇ 2020 c All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT LIBERAL PARTIES IN EUROPE AND HUMAN RIGHTS EMPHASIS ŞEYMA KOÇ POLITICAL SCIENCE M.A. THESIS, AUGUST 2020 Thesis Supervisor: Assoc.Prof. Özge Kemahlıoğlu Keywords: Political Parties, Liberal Party Family, Human Rights Emphasis, Economic Conditions Liberal parties are mostly neglected by the literature on political parties despite their central role in establishing European liberal democracies. This thesis aims to contribute to the contemporary literature on liberal parties by examining 33 Eu- ropean democracies and covering a time period including observations of 75 years. The empirical analysis shows that liberal parties are distinguishable from the other party families on their emphasis on human rights and freedom. Then, this thesis investigates the impact of economic conditions on liberal parties’ relative emphasis on human rights and freedom. The findings illustrate that higher levels of unemploy- ment rate decrease liberal parties’ relative emphasis on human rights and freedom and increase their relative emphasis on economic issues. Its effect on the relative em- phasis on human rights and freedom issue and economic issues is substantive when the distributions of the dependent variables are considered. This finding may demon- strate the liberal parties’ responsiveness to changing needs of the electorate and a value change in politics too.
    [Show full text]
  • VIVERE MILITARE EST from Populus to Emperors - Living on the Frontier Volume I
    VIVERE MILITARE EST From Populus to Emperors - Living on the Frontier Volume I BELGRADE 2018 VIVERE MILITARE EST From Populus to Emperors - Living on the Frontier INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY MONOGRAPHIES No. 68/1 VIVERE MILITARE EST From Populus to Emperors - Living on the Frontier VOM LU E I Belgrade 2018 PUBLISHER PROOFREADING Institute of Archaeology Dave Calcutt Kneza Mihaila 35/IV Ranko Bugarski 11000 Belgrade Jelena Vitezović http://www.ai.ac.rs Tamara Rodwell-Jovanović [email protected] Rajka Marinković Tel. +381 11 2637-191 GRAPHIC DESIGN MONOGRAPHIES 68/1 Nemanja Mrđić EDITOR IN CHIEF PRINTED BY Miomir Korać DigitalArt Beograd Institute of Archaeology, Belgrade PRINTED IN EDITORS 500 copies Snežana Golubović Institute of Archaeology, Belgrade COVER PAGE Nemanja Mrđić Tabula Traiana, Iron Gate Institute of Archaeology, Belgrade REVIEWERS EDITORiaL BOARD Diliana Angelova, Departments of History of Art Bojan Ðurić, University of Ljubljana, Faculty and History Berkeley University, Berkeley; Vesna of Arts, Ljubljana; Cristian Gazdac, Faculty of Dimitrijević, Faculty of Philosophy, University History and Philosophy University of Cluj-Napoca of Belgrade, Belgrade; Erik Hrnčiarik, Faculty of and Visiting Fellow at the University of Oxford; Philosophy and Arts, Trnava University, Trnava; Gordana Jeremić, Institute of Archaeology, Belgrade; Kristina Jelinčić Vučković, Institute of Archaeology, Miomir Korać, Institute of Archaeology, Belgrade; Zagreb; Mario Novak, Institute for Anthropological Ioan Piso, Faculty of History and Philosophy Research,
    [Show full text]
  • Serbia in 2001 Under the Spotlight
    1 Human Rights in Transition – Serbia 2001 Introduction The situation of human rights in Serbia was largely influenced by the foregoing circumstances. Although the severe repression characteristic especially of the last two years of Milosevic’s rule was gone, there were no conditions in place for dealing with the problems accumulated during the previous decade. All the mechanisms necessary to ensure the exercise of human rights - from the judiciary to the police, remained unchanged. However, the major concern of citizens is the mere existential survival and personal security. Furthermore, the general atmosphere in the society was just as xenophobic and intolerant as before. The identity crisis of the Serb people and of all minorities living in Serbia continued. If anything, it deepened and the relationship between the state and its citizens became seriously jeopardized by the problem of Serbia’s undefined borders. The crisis was manifest with regard to certain minorities such as Vlachs who were believed to have been successfully assimilated. This false belief was partly due to the fact that neighbouring Romania had been in a far worse situation than Yugoslavia during the past fifty years. In considerably changed situation in Romania and Serbia Vlachs are now undergoing the process of self identification though still unclear whether they would choose to call themselves Vlachs or Romanians-Vlachs. Considering that the international factor has become the main generator of change in Serbia, the Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia believes that an accurate picture of the situation in Serbia is absolutely necessary. It is essential to establish the differences between Belgrade and the rest of Serbia, taking into account its internal diversities.
    [Show full text]
  • COLD ARMS Zoran Markov Dragutin Petrović
    COLD ARMS Zoran Markov Dragutin Petrović MUZEUL BANATULUI TIMIŞOARA 2012 PREFACE Authors of the catalog and exhibition: Zoran Markov, Curator, Banat Museum of Timisoara Dragutin Petrović, Museum - Consultant, The City Museum of Vršac Associates at the exhibition: Vesna Stankov, Etnologist, Senior Curator Dragana Lepir, Historian Reviewer: “Regional Centre for the Heritage of Banat — Concordia” is set adopted a draft strategy for long-term research, protection and pro- Eng. Branko Bogdanović up with funds provided by the EU and the Municipality of Vršac, motion of the cultural heritage of Banat, where Banat means a ge- Catalog design: as a cross-border cooperation project between the City Museum ographical region, which politically belongs to Romania, Hungary Javor Rašajski of Vršac (CMV) and Banat Museum in Timisoara (MBT). In im- and Serbia. Photos: plementation of this project, the reconstruction of the building of All the parts of the Banat region have been inextricably linked Milan Šepecan Concordia has a fundamental role. It will house the Regional Centre by cultural relations since the earliest prehistoric times. Owing to Ivan Kalnak and also be a place for the permanent museum exhibition. its specific geographical position, distinctive features and the criss- Technical editor: The main objective of establishing the Regional Centre in crossing rivers Tisza, Tamis and Karas, as the ways used for spread- Ivan Kalnak Concordia is cross-border cooperation between all institutions of ing influence by a number of different cultures, identified in archae- COLD ARMS culture and science in the task of production of a strategic plan ological research, the area of Banat represents today an inexhaust- and creation of best conditions for the preservation and presenta- ible source of information about cultural and historic ties.
    [Show full text]
  • SE Weekly Mar 14 20.Pdf
    Weekly Review // March 14 - 20 SOUTHEASTERN EUROPE Observatory The Southeastern Europe Intelligence Unit is formed by an ambitious group of young scientists which focuses on the political, economic, defense and security developments in the wider region of Southeastern Europe. Our main task is the “Southeastern Europe Observatory” to become a credible, detailed, objective and flexible “tool” of information and short analysis in the hands of the researcher and the professional who is interested in the current affairs of this sensitive and crucial part of the European continent. In each weekly review, you will find the most significant news of the previous week in the region. SPECIAL COUNTRY REPORT: Turkey Kurds clash with police at Newroz - a cultural or a political suppression? very year March 21, millions of Kurds across the world celebrate Newroz, which refers to the beginning of the New Year for the Kurdish people. Meaning ‘the new day’ in Kurdish language, Newroz represents the beginning of Spring and the starts of the New EYear. Members of the pro-Kurdish party BDP (Peace and Democracy Party) applied for permission to spread their fests to the days of 17-21 March as they have been doing in previous years. However, this year, the Ministry of the Interior denied permission for the earlier start of Newroz celebrations before the 21st, strictly prohibiting any activity on March 18. The ban arrived soon after the president of the BDP, Selahattin Demirtas declared the official celebrations shall take place on Sunday the 18th, instead of Monday 21st. Despite the bans, Newroz celebrations took place in Van, Hakkari, Siirt, Mus, Diyarbakır, Instabul and Ankara.
    [Show full text]
  • Southeastern Europe
    U.S. ONLINE TRAINING FOR OSCE, INCLUDING REACT Module 5. Southeastern Europe This module introduces you to southeastern Europe and the OSCE’s work in: • Croatia (The OSCE Office in Zagreb was closed in 2012) • Macedonia • Bosnia-Herzegovina • Serbia • Kosovo • Montenegro • Albania . 1 Table of Contents Overview. 3 Geography. 4 People. 6 Former Yugoslavia. 10 World War I. 11 World War II. 12 Federal People’s Republic of Yugoslavia. 14 Post-Tito. 15 Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. 17 Croatia. 18 Key information. 19 Historical background. 20 During Tito. 21 After Tito. 22 War of independence. 23 Domestic politics. 25 Macedonia. 35 Key information. 36 Historical background. 38 19th and early 20th centuries. 39 During Tito. 41 Independence. 43 Domestic politics. 44 Prospects and challenges. 67 Bosnia-Herzegovina (BiH). 72 Key information. 73 Historical background. 75 During the Tito era. 76 The Bosnian war: 1992-1995. 79 Disunity of international community. 81 The Dayton Peace Accords, 1995. 84 Politics since Dayton. 87 Challenges and pressures. 95 Serbia. 99 Key information. 100 Introduction. 101 Contemporary Serbia. 102 Miloševi?'s rise. 104 Domestic resistance and state oppression. 106 Consequences of Kosovo. 109 The short-lived Kosovo Verification Mission. 110 MODULE 5. Southeastern Europe 2 Regime repression intensifies. 112 Struggle for Serbia’s political direction. 115 Nikolic wins 2012 presidential election. 122 Serbia's identity and its vision for the future. 124 Montenegro. 131 Key information. 132 Contemporary Montenegro. 133 Politics in Montenegro. 134 Other issues. 140 Kosovo. 142 Key information. 143 Historical background of Kosovo. 144 Organized non-violence. 145 After Dayton. 147 UNMIK established.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 SERBIA PUBLIC OPINION STUDY Respondent Booklet A
    2012 SERBIA PUBLIC OPINION STUDY Respondent Booklet A Page 1 • Boris Tadić Choice for a Better Life • Tomislav Nikolić Serbian Progressive Party (SNS) • Ivica Dačić SPS, PUPS, JS • Vojislav Koštunica Democratic Party of Serbia (DSS) • Zoran Stanković United Regions of Serbia (URS) • Čedomir Jovanović LDP, SPO, SDU... • Jadranka Šešelj Serbian Radical Party (SRS) • Vladan Glišić "Dveri" • Istvan Pasztor SVM • Zoran Dragišić Pokret radnika i seljaka • Muamer Zukorlić Citizen's group • Danica Grujičić Social Democratic Alliance Page 2 • Choice for a Better Life - Boris Tadić • Let’s Get Serbia Moving - Tomislav Nikolić • Ivica Dačić - Socialist Party of Serbia - PUPS-US • Democratic Party of Serbia (DSS) - Vojislav Koštunica • Turnover - Čedomir Jovanović • United Regions of Serbia - Mlađan Dinkić • Serbian Radical Party - Vojislav Šešelj • Dveri for the Life of Serbia • Alliance of Vojvodina Hungarians - István Pásztor • Movement of Workers and Peasants • Communist party - Josip Broz • Party of Democratic Action of Sanjak - Sulejman Ugljani • All Together - BDU, CAH, DUC, DFVH, Slovak - Emir Elfić • "None of the offered answers" • Social Democratic alliance - Nebojša Leković • Albanians Coalition from Preševo Valley (KAPD) • Reformist party - Milan Višnjić • Montenegrin party - Nenad Stevović Page 3 • For a European Serbia - Boris Tadić • Serbian Radical Party - Vojislav Šešelj • Democratic Party of Serbia - New Serbia - Vojislav Koštunica • Socialist Party of Serbia (SPS) - PUPS - US • Liberal Democratic Party - Čedomir Jovanović • Hungarian
    [Show full text]
  • Survey: English
    data Baza phon Phone number _____________________________________________________ e_nu _____________________________________________________ proje m _____________________________________________________ catid proje Project ID catid __________ ID sp sp Sample point __________ Sample point intid intid int __________ intID crb crb crb adre __________ crb sa1 uvod Uvod adre {address} 1. Yes hh_h sa1 2. No ol hh_h Don't approach the household yet. Please answer several questions either outside or in your car. ol hh1 hh1 Which of the following best describes type of settlement in 1. Rural area or village which the household is located? 2. Small town or medium size town 3. Suburb of a large city 4. Large city ¿ ( Do not know) hh2 hh2 Now we would like you to write down some observations 1. Not a housing unit sl94 regarding the type of household and its surrounding. 2. Housing unit 3. Not sure whether this is a housing unit sl87 sl87 Write down in this field the description of chosen household _____________________________________________________ to facilitate coming back to the same address (e.g. yellow _____________________________________________________ house with wooden door, large yard and white fence, _____________________________________________________ luxurious villa) sl1 sl1 Does the number of households coincide with the expected 1. Yes sl2 number? 2. No sl1a sl1a Which of the following statements best describes situation 1. More flats / households than expected a1_1 which you found? 2. Less flats / households than expected sla2_ 1 3. The assigned address does not exist b1_1 4. Not a dwelling c1 sl2 Did you find the household which was assigned to you in the 1. Yes ishod sample? time _1 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Observation of the Early Parliamentary Elections in Serbia (16 March 2014)
    http://assembly.coe.int Doc. 13516 22 May 2014 Observation of the early parliamentary elections in Serbia (16 March 2014) Election observation report Ad hoc Committee of the Bureau Rapporteur: Mr Pedro AGRAMUNT, Spain, Group of the European People's Party Contents Page 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1 2. Legal framework ..................................................................................................................................... 2 3. Electoral administration, registration of the voters lists and candidates ................................................. 4 4. Election campaign and media environment ............................................................................................ 4 5. Election day ............................................................................................................................................ 6 6. Conclusions and recommendations........................................................................................................ 6 Appendix 1 – Composition of the ad hoc committee.................................................................................... 8 Appendix 2 – Programme of the election observation mission (14-17 March 2014) ................................... 9 Appendix 3 – Statement by the International Election Observation Mission (IEOM) ................................. 11 1. Introduction 1. The Bureau of the Parliamentary
    [Show full text]
  • Download/Print the Study in PDF Format
    GENERAL ELECTIONS IN SERBIA 16th March 2014 European Elections monitor The Progressive Party in office tipped to be the early election winner on 16th March in Serbia Corinne Deloy Translated by Helen Levy At the end of January the President of the Republic Tomislav Nikolic (Progressive Party, SNS) announced that early elections would take place on 16th March two years ahead of schedule. This comes in response to the Deputy Prime Minister responsible for Defence, Security and the Fight to counter Corruption and the leader of the Progressive Party, Aleksandar Vucic (SNS), who asked Analysis for a new election to “win a stronger majority so that vital economic reforms can be undertaken in the country.” “I propose we see what the people want. The time has come for us to give account to the electo- rate,” said the Progressive Party leader. “We have done some good things. Our base is now strong but in the future we have to do better and with greater speed,” he added. “We have a great deal of work ahead, painful reforms which will improve our citizens’ lives,” indicated the head of State Tomislav Nikolic. The Progressive Party wants to strengthen its power crime. Since the autumn of 2013 billionaire Miroslav by taking advantage of the support, which according to Miskovic, believed to be the richest man in Serbia the polls, it enjoys amongst the Serbs. Its popularity and ten of his associates have been on trial for abuse notably lies in the launch on 21st January of Belgrade’s of power and tax fraud.
    [Show full text]