DOCSLIB.ORG

Survey: English

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Survey: English data Baza phon Phone number _____________________________________________________ e_nu _____________________________________________________ proje m _____________________________________________________ catid proje Project ID catid __________ ID sp sp Sample point __________ Sample point intid intid int __________ intID crb crb crb adre __________ crb sa1 uvod Uvod adre {address} 1. Yes hh_h sa1 2. No ol hh_h Don't approach the household yet. Please answer several questions either outside or in your car. ol hh1 hh1 Which of the following best describes type of settlement in 1. Rural area or village which the household is located? 2. Small town or medium size town 3. Suburb of a large city 4. Large city ¿ ( Do not know) hh2 hh2 Now we would like you to write down some observations 1. Not a housing unit sl94 regarding the type of household and its surrounding. 2. Housing unit 3. Not sure whether this is a housing unit sl87 sl87 Write down in this field the description of chosen household _____________________________________________________ to facilitate coming back to the same address (e.g. yellow _____________________________________________________ house with wooden door, large yard and white fence, _____________________________________________________ luxurious villa) sl1 sl1 Does the number of households coincide with the expected 1. Yes sl2 number? 2. No sl1a sl1a Which of the following statements best describes situation 1. More flats / households than expected a1_1 which you found? 2. Less flats / households than expected sla2_ 1 3. The assigned address does not exist b1_1 4. Not a dwelling c1 sl2 Did you find the household which was assigned to you in the 1. Yes ishod sample? time _1 2. No sl2a sl2a Please explain how come that the household is not there? _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ b1_1 b1_1 Please describe the reason for not finding the address, for _____________________________________________________ example, there is no such street, there is no such house _____________________________________________________ number _____________________________________________________ b2_1 b2_1 Describe the immediate environment of the place where the _____________________________________________________ address should have been. For example, new building site, _____________________________________________________ demolished houses, impossible to identify street (explain why _____________________________________________________ it is impossible) b3a b3a This is the end of work on this address. Save the _____________________________________________________ questionnaire and exit program. _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ c1 c1 What kind of object is this (e.g. Gomex store, business _____________________________________________________ premises –tire repairman, demolished or deserted house) _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ c2 c2 Please write down any additional observations which could be _____________________________________________________ useful for identification of the object. _____________________________________________________ c3 _____________________________________________________ c3 This is the end of work on this address. Save the _____________________________________________________ questionnaire and exit program. _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ a1_1 a1_1 Enter number of flats – households in the assigned building or house __________ number of flats If there are up to 10 flats write down exact number of flats, and if there are more than 10 flats write down number 10. [ANK] Important: If there are more than 10 flats (or more) than expected, approach each tenth relative to chosen number. In this case please contact IPSOS headquarters to open new sla2_ questionnaires for you with these ID numbers. 1 sla2_ Number of flats in building broj_ 1 __________ number of flats bira moa broj_ Program selects the number where the interviewing will take bbroj bira place __________ flat number stan moa a bbroj Thank you. Computer has randomly selected {broj_biramoa} the number of flat for interviewing. stan sla2_ a 1a sla2_ Does the assigned number of flat exist? 1. Yes sl2_d 1a (either the number which coincides with the assigned number, a or the one ascertained by counting flats / interphones.) 2. No sl94 sl2_d Have you found the household which was assigned to you by 1. Yes ishod a sample (or based on generator of random number)? time _1 2. No sl2_n e sl2_n Reason for not finding the household: 1. No one resides on the address / in flat ishod e 2. Not a dwelling (e.g. solarium) time 3. Other, what?:______________________ _1 isho Write down date and time here dtim __________ ts ishod e_1 _1 isho Outcome when you rang the doorbell (OUTCOME OF THE 1. Nobody at home ishod d_1 FIRST VISIT) time _2 If there is no one home, you have to return to this household, 2. Refusal of the household ishod following the instructions given. _opis Save the interview and exit. 1 3. There is no eligible respondent in the household (no one had the right to vote on May 6th ) sl94 4. Entering the household hh3a isho Write down date and time here dtim __________ ts ishod e_2 _2 isho Outcome when you rang the doorbell (OUTCOME OF THE 1. Nobody at home ishod d_2 SECOND VISIT) time _3 If there is no one home, you have to return to this household, 2. Refusal of the household ishod following the instructions given. _opis Save the interview and exit. 2 3. There is no eligible respondent in the household (no one had the right to vote on May 6th ) sl94 4. Entering the household hh3a isho Write down date and time here dtim __________ ts ishod e_3 _3 isho Outcome when you rang the doorbell (OUTCOME OF THE 1. Nobody at home ishod 2 d_3 THIRD VISIT) time _4 If there is no one home, you have to return to this household, 2. Refusal of the household ishod following the instructions given. _opis Save the interview and exit. 3 3. There is no eligible respondent in the household (no one had the right to vote on May 6th ) sl94 4. Entering the household hh3a isho Write down date and time here dtim __________ ts ishod e_4 _4 isho Outcome when you rang the doorbell (OUTCOME OF THE 1. Nobody at home sl94 d_4 FOURTH VISIT) 2. Refusal of the household ishod _opis If there is no one home, you have to return to this household, 4 following the instructions given. Save the interview and exit. 3. There is no eligible respondent in the household (no one had the right to vote on May 6th ) sl94 4. Entering the household hh3a hh3a Good afternoon, my name is ............ and I am an interviewer in 1. YES br_o Ipsos in Belgrade. This is my ID card (show card). sob We are doing a scientific research about public opinion in 2. NO – there are several households hh3a Serbia and we chose your household randomly. Since this is a _vise scientific research, I am to choose one household, randomly, and one adult from that household. 3. NO – there no household here – cottage, summer residence of If you allow me, I would like to ask first whether one or several owners who live abroad households are located in this house/ flat? ¡ ( Refusal) [ANK] Show IPSOS identification Household members are all persons who pay bills together and eat at least one meal together. sl94 hh3a How many households are there? pbroj _vise __________ number of households _bira moa pbroj Thank you. Computer has randomly chosen {broj_biramoa} _bira number of flat for interviewing. __________ flat number br_o moa sob br_o We would like to interview someone in your household. sob How many adults are there in your household (persons of __________ persons legal age in May 2012, in the time of the election)? uvod 1 uvod What name or identification am I to enter for...? 1 1. First person _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ 2. Second person _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ 3. Third person _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ 4. Fourth person _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ 5. Fifth person _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ hh7a 3 6. Sixth person _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ 7. Seventh person _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ 8. Eighth person _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ 9. Ninth person _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Macro Report Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 4: Macro Report September 10, 2012
    Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 1 Module 4: Macro Report Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 4: Macro Report September 10, 2012 Country: Serbia Date of Election: May 6, 2012 (Parliamentary and first round presidential); May 20, 2012 - second round presidential Prepared by: Bojan Todosijević Date of Preparation: 05. 08. 2013. NOTES TO COLLABORATORS: ° The information provided in this report contributes to an important part of the CSES project. The information may be filled out by yourself, or by an expert or experts of your choice. Your efforts in providing these data are greatly appreciated! Any supplementary documents that you can provide (e.g., electoral legislation, party manifestos, electoral commission reports, media reports) are also appreciated, and may be made available on the CSES website. ° Answers should be as of the date of the election being studied. ° Where brackets [ ] appear, collaborators should answer by placing an “X” within the appropriate bracket or brackets. For example: [X] ° If more space is needed to answer any question, please lengthen the document as necessary. Data Pertinent to the Election at which the Module was Administered 1a. Type of Election [ ] Parliamentary/Legislative [X] Parliamentary/Legislative and Presidential [ ] Presidential [ ] Other; please specify: __________ 1b. If the type of election in Question 1a included Parliamentary/Legislative, was the election for the Upper House, Lower House, or both? [ X] Upper House [ ] Lower House [ ] Both [ ] Other; please specify: __________ Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 2 Module 4: Macro Report 2a. What was the party of the president prior to the most recent election, regardless of whether the election was presidential? Democratic Party (Demokratska stranka, DS) 2b.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberal Parties in Europe and Human Rights Emphasis
    LIBERAL PARTIES IN EUROPE AND HUMAN RIGHTS EMPHASIS by ŞEYMA KOÇ Submitted to the Graduate School of Social Sciences in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Sabancı University August 2020 LIBERAL PARTIES IN EUROPE AND HUMAN RIGHTS EMPHASIS Approved by: Assoc. Prof Özge Kemahlıoğlu . (Thesis Supervisor) Prof. Ali Çarkoğlu . Asst. Prof. Mert Moral . Date of Approval: August 5, 2020 ŞEYMA KOÇ 2020 c All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT LIBERAL PARTIES IN EUROPE AND HUMAN RIGHTS EMPHASIS ŞEYMA KOÇ POLITICAL SCIENCE M.A. THESIS, AUGUST 2020 Thesis Supervisor: Assoc.Prof. Özge Kemahlıoğlu Keywords: Political Parties, Liberal Party Family, Human Rights Emphasis, Economic Conditions Liberal parties are mostly neglected by the literature on political parties despite their central role in establishing European liberal democracies. This thesis aims to contribute to the contemporary literature on liberal parties by examining 33 Eu- ropean democracies and covering a time period including observations of 75 years. The empirical analysis shows that liberal parties are distinguishable from the other party families on their emphasis on human rights and freedom. Then, this thesis investigates the impact of economic conditions on liberal parties’ relative emphasis on human rights and freedom. The findings illustrate that higher levels of unemploy- ment rate decrease liberal parties’ relative emphasis on human rights and freedom and increase their relative emphasis on economic issues. Its effect on the relative em- phasis on human rights and freedom issue and economic issues is substantive when the distributions of the dependent variables are considered. This finding may demon- strate the liberal parties’ responsiveness to changing needs of the electorate and a value change in politics too.
    [Show full text]
  • Serbia in 2001 Under the Spotlight
    1 Human Rights in Transition – Serbia 2001 Introduction The situation of human rights in Serbia was largely influenced by the foregoing circumstances. Although the severe repression characteristic especially of the last two years of Milosevic’s rule was gone, there were no conditions in place for dealing with the problems accumulated during the previous decade. All the mechanisms necessary to ensure the exercise of human rights - from the judiciary to the police, remained unchanged. However, the major concern of citizens is the mere existential survival and personal security. Furthermore, the general atmosphere in the society was just as xenophobic and intolerant as before. The identity crisis of the Serb people and of all minorities living in Serbia continued. If anything, it deepened and the relationship between the state and its citizens became seriously jeopardized by the problem of Serbia’s undefined borders. The crisis was manifest with regard to certain minorities such as Vlachs who were believed to have been successfully assimilated. This false belief was partly due to the fact that neighbouring Romania had been in a far worse situation than Yugoslavia during the past fifty years. In considerably changed situation in Romania and Serbia Vlachs are now undergoing the process of self identification though still unclear whether they would choose to call themselves Vlachs or Romanians-Vlachs. Considering that the international factor has become the main generator of change in Serbia, the Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia believes that an accurate picture of the situation in Serbia is absolutely necessary. It is essential to establish the differences between Belgrade and the rest of Serbia, taking into account its internal diversities.
    [Show full text]
  • SE Weekly Mar 14 20.Pdf
    Weekly Review // March 14 - 20 SOUTHEASTERN EUROPE Observatory The Southeastern Europe Intelligence Unit is formed by an ambitious group of young scientists which focuses on the political, economic, defense and security developments in the wider region of Southeastern Europe. Our main task is the “Southeastern Europe Observatory” to become a credible, detailed, objective and flexible “tool” of information and short analysis in the hands of the researcher and the professional who is interested in the current affairs of this sensitive and crucial part of the European continent. In each weekly review, you will find the most significant news of the previous week in the region. SPECIAL COUNTRY REPORT: Turkey Kurds clash with police at Newroz - a cultural or a political suppression? very year March 21, millions of Kurds across the world celebrate Newroz, which refers to the beginning of the New Year for the Kurdish people. Meaning ‘the new day’ in Kurdish language, Newroz represents the beginning of Spring and the starts of the New EYear. Members of the pro-Kurdish party BDP (Peace and Democracy Party) applied for permission to spread their fests to the days of 17-21 March as they have been doing in previous years. However, this year, the Ministry of the Interior denied permission for the earlier start of Newroz celebrations before the 21st, strictly prohibiting any activity on March 18. The ban arrived soon after the president of the BDP, Selahattin Demirtas declared the official celebrations shall take place on Sunday the 18th, instead of Monday 21st. Despite the bans, Newroz celebrations took place in Van, Hakkari, Siirt, Mus, Diyarbakır, Instabul and Ankara.
    [Show full text]
  • Southeastern Europe
    U.S. ONLINE TRAINING FOR OSCE, INCLUDING REACT Module 5. Southeastern Europe This module introduces you to southeastern Europe and the OSCE’s work in: • Croatia (The OSCE Office in Zagreb was closed in 2012) • Macedonia • Bosnia-Herzegovina • Serbia • Kosovo • Montenegro • Albania . 1 Table of Contents Overview. 3 Geography. 4 People. 6 Former Yugoslavia. 10 World War I. 11 World War II. 12 Federal People’s Republic of Yugoslavia. 14 Post-Tito. 15 Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. 17 Croatia. 18 Key information. 19 Historical background. 20 During Tito. 21 After Tito. 22 War of independence. 23 Domestic politics. 25 Macedonia. 35 Key information. 36 Historical background. 38 19th and early 20th centuries. 39 During Tito. 41 Independence. 43 Domestic politics. 44 Prospects and challenges. 67 Bosnia-Herzegovina (BiH). 72 Key information. 73 Historical background. 75 During the Tito era. 76 The Bosnian war: 1992-1995. 79 Disunity of international community. 81 The Dayton Peace Accords, 1995. 84 Politics since Dayton. 87 Challenges and pressures. 95 Serbia. 99 Key information. 100 Introduction. 101 Contemporary Serbia. 102 Miloševi?'s rise. 104 Domestic resistance and state oppression. 106 Consequences of Kosovo. 109 The short-lived Kosovo Verification Mission. 110 MODULE 5. Southeastern Europe 2 Regime repression intensifies. 112 Struggle for Serbia’s political direction. 115 Nikolic wins 2012 presidential election. 122 Serbia's identity and its vision for the future. 124 Montenegro. 131 Key information. 132 Contemporary Montenegro. 133 Politics in Montenegro. 134 Other issues. 140 Kosovo. 142 Key information. 143 Historical background of Kosovo. 144 Organized non-violence. 145 After Dayton. 147 UNMIK established.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 SERBIA PUBLIC OPINION STUDY Respondent Booklet A
    2012 SERBIA PUBLIC OPINION STUDY Respondent Booklet A Page 1 • Boris Tadić Choice for a Better Life • Tomislav Nikolić Serbian Progressive Party (SNS) • Ivica Dačić SPS, PUPS, JS • Vojislav Koštunica Democratic Party of Serbia (DSS) • Zoran Stanković United Regions of Serbia (URS) • Čedomir Jovanović LDP, SPO, SDU... • Jadranka Šešelj Serbian Radical Party (SRS) • Vladan Glišić "Dveri" • Istvan Pasztor SVM • Zoran Dragišić Pokret radnika i seljaka • Muamer Zukorlić Citizen's group • Danica Grujičić Social Democratic Alliance Page 2 • Choice for a Better Life - Boris Tadić • Let’s Get Serbia Moving - Tomislav Nikolić • Ivica Dačić - Socialist Party of Serbia - PUPS-US • Democratic Party of Serbia (DSS) - Vojislav Koštunica • Turnover - Čedomir Jovanović • United Regions of Serbia - Mlađan Dinkić • Serbian Radical Party - Vojislav Šešelj • Dveri for the Life of Serbia • Alliance of Vojvodina Hungarians - István Pásztor • Movement of Workers and Peasants • Communist party - Josip Broz • Party of Democratic Action of Sanjak - Sulejman Ugljani • All Together - BDU, CAH, DUC, DFVH, Slovak - Emir Elfić • "None of the offered answers" • Social Democratic alliance - Nebojša Leković • Albanians Coalition from Preševo Valley (KAPD) • Reformist party - Milan Višnjić • Montenegrin party - Nenad Stevović Page 3 • For a European Serbia - Boris Tadić • Serbian Radical Party - Vojislav Šešelj • Democratic Party of Serbia - New Serbia - Vojislav Koštunica • Socialist Party of Serbia (SPS) - PUPS - US • Liberal Democratic Party - Čedomir Jovanović • Hungarian
    [Show full text]
  • The World Factbook Europe :: Serbia Introduction :: Serbia Background
    The World Factbook Europe :: Serbia Introduction :: Serbia Background: The Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes was formed in 1918; its name was changed to Yugoslavia in 1929. Various paramilitary bands resisted Nazi Germany's occupation and division of Yugoslavia from 1941 to 1945, but fought each other and ethnic opponents as much as the invaders. The military and political movement headed by Josip "TITO" Broz (Partisans) took full control of Yugoslavia when German and Croatian separatist forces were defeated in 1945. Although communist, TITO's new government and his successors (he died in 1980) managed to steer their own path between the Warsaw Pact nations and the West for the next four and a half decades. In 1989, Slobodan MILOSEVIC became president of the Republic of Serbia and his ultranationalist calls for Serbian domination led to the violent breakup of Yugoslavia along ethnic lines. In 1991, Croatia, Slovenia, and Macedonia declared independence, followed by Bosnia in 1992. The remaining republics of Serbia and Montenegro declared a new Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY) in April 1992 and under MILOSEVIC's leadership, Serbia led various military campaigns to unite ethnic Serbs in neighboring republics into a "Greater Serbia." These actions were ultimately unsuccessful and led to the signing of the Dayton Peace Accords in 1995. MILOSEVIC retained control over Serbia and eventually became president of the FRY in 1997. In 1998, an ethnic Albanian insurgency in the formerly autonomous Serbian province of Kosovo provoked a Serbian counterinsurgency campaign that resulted in massacres and massive expulsions of ethnic Albanians living in Kosovo. The MILOSEVIC government's rejection of a proposed international settlement led to NATO's bombing of Serbia in the spring of 1999, to the withdrawal of Serbian military and police forces from Kosovo in June 1999, and to the stationing of a NATO-led force in Kosovo to provide a safe and secure environment for the region's ethnic communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Observation of the Early Parliamentary Elections in Serbia (16 March 2014)
    http://assembly.coe.int Doc. 13516 22 May 2014 Observation of the early parliamentary elections in Serbia (16 March 2014) Election observation report Ad hoc Committee of the Bureau Rapporteur: Mr Pedro AGRAMUNT, Spain, Group of the European People's Party Contents Page 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1 2. Legal framework ..................................................................................................................................... 2 3. Electoral administration, registration of the voters lists and candidates ................................................. 4 4. Election campaign and media environment ............................................................................................ 4 5. Election day ............................................................................................................................................ 6 6. Conclusions and recommendations........................................................................................................ 6 Appendix 1 – Composition of the ad hoc committee.................................................................................... 8 Appendix 2 – Programme of the election observation mission (14-17 March 2014) ................................... 9 Appendix 3 – Statement by the International Election Observation Mission (IEOM) ................................. 11 1. Introduction 1. The Bureau of the Parliamentary
    [Show full text]
  • Download/Print the Study in PDF Format
    GENERAL ELECTIONS IN SERBIA 16th March 2014 European Elections monitor The Progressive Party in office tipped to be the early election winner on 16th March in Serbia Corinne Deloy Translated by Helen Levy At the end of January the President of the Republic Tomislav Nikolic (Progressive Party, SNS) announced that early elections would take place on 16th March two years ahead of schedule. This comes in response to the Deputy Prime Minister responsible for Defence, Security and the Fight to counter Corruption and the leader of the Progressive Party, Aleksandar Vucic (SNS), who asked Analysis for a new election to “win a stronger majority so that vital economic reforms can be undertaken in the country.” “I propose we see what the people want. The time has come for us to give account to the electo- rate,” said the Progressive Party leader. “We have done some good things. Our base is now strong but in the future we have to do better and with greater speed,” he added. “We have a great deal of work ahead, painful reforms which will improve our citizens’ lives,” indicated the head of State Tomislav Nikolic. The Progressive Party wants to strengthen its power crime. Since the autumn of 2013 billionaire Miroslav by taking advantage of the support, which according to Miskovic, believed to be the richest man in Serbia the polls, it enjoys amongst the Serbs. Its popularity and ten of his associates have been on trial for abuse notably lies in the launch on 21st January of Belgrade’s of power and tax fraud.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Serbia Anti-Corruption Agency The
    REPUBLIC OF SERBIA ANTI-CORRUPTION AGENCY THE FIRST REPORT ON OVERSIGHT OF POLITICAL ENTITES 2012 ELECTION CAMPAIGN COSTS Belgrade, May 2013 Translation of this document has been provided through a USAID funded Judicial Reform and Government Accountability Project. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 5 1. DATA USED FOR THE ANALYSIS AND OVERSIGHT OF FINANCIAL REPORTS 8 1.1. Collection of data during the election monitoring campaign 8 1.1.1. Concept and structure of monitoring 8 1.1.2. Collection and exchange of data 10 1.1.3. Purpose and importance of monitoring 10 1.2. Collection of data from state authorities, banks, legal entities and natural persons 10 1.2.1. Advertising via media outlets 11 1.2.2. Advertising by election material 12 1.2.3. Public event organization 12 2. SUBJECT TO OVERSIGHT 14 3. FINANCIAL INDICATORS 18 3.1. Income 19 3.1.1. Contributions from natural persons 19 3.1.2. Contributions from legal entities 24 3.2. Expenditures 25 3.2.1. Public advertising 29 3.2.2. Election Material 31 3.2.3. Other expenses 33 3.2.4. Public events 34 4. COMPARISON OF PRESENTED INCOME AND EXPENDITURES 36 4.1. Comparative Review of Income and Expenditures 36 5. ELECTORAL BOND 37 6. RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE COURSE OF OVERSIGHT 38 7. FACTS INDICATING VIOLATIONS OF THE LAW ON FINANCING OF POLITICAL ACTIVITIES AND PHENOMENA OBSERVED DURING INCOME AND EXPENDITURES OVERSIGHT 40 7.1. Facts indicating violations of the Law observed in income and expenditures oversight 40 7.1.1. Failure to submit the report on election campaign costs 40 7.1.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Observation of the Parliamentary Elections and the Early Presidential Election in Serbia (6 May 2012)
    Parliamentary Assembly Assemblée parlementaire http://assembly.coe.int Doc. 12938 24 May 2012 Observation of the parliamentary elections and the early presidential election in Serbia (6 May 2012) Election observation report Ad hoc Committee of the Bureau Rapporteur: Mr Jean-Charles GARDETTO, Monaco, Group of the European People's Party Contents Page 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1 2. Political and legal framework .................................................................................................................. 2 3. Electoral administration and registration of the lists and of presidential candidates............................... 3 4. Election campaign and media environment ............................................................................................ 4 5. Election day ............................................................................................................................................ 5 6. Conclusions and recommendations........................................................................................................ 6 Appendix 1 – Composition of the ad hoc committee.................................................................................... 8 Appendix 2 – Programme for the observation of the parliamentary and early presidential elections .......... 9 Appendix 3 – Statement by the International Election Observation Mission (IEOM) ................................
    [Show full text]
  • Manifesto Project Dataset List of Coded Documents Version 2015A
    Manifesto Project Dataset List of coded documents [email protected] Website: https://manifesto-project.wzb.eu/ Version 2015a from May 22, 2015 Manifesto Project Dataset List of coded documents Version 2015a Contents 1 Albania 3 2 Armenia 4 3 Australia 6 4 Austria 9 5 Azerbaijan 11 6 Belarus 12 7 Belgium 13 8 Bosnia Herzegovina 19 9 Bosnia-Herzegovina 21 10 Bulgaria 21 11 Canada 24 12 Croatia 27 13 Cyprus 31 14 Czech Republic 32 15 Denmark 35 16 Estonia 41 17 Finland 44 18 France 48 19 Georgia 52 20 German Democratic Republic 56 21 Germany 58 22 Greece 62 23 Hungary 65 24 Iceland 67 25 Ireland 70 26 Israel 74 27 Italy 80 28 Japan 88 29 Latvia 88 30 Lithuania 91 1 Manifesto Project Dataset List of coded documents Version 2015a 31 Luxembourg 94 32 Macedonia 97 33 Malta 101 34 Mexico 101 35 Moldova 104 36 Montenegro 106 37 Netherlands 108 38 New Zealand 113 39 Northern Ireland 115 40 Norway 115 41 Poland 118 42 Portugal 122 43 Romania 126 44 Russia 129 45 Serbia 132 46 Slovakia 137 47 Slovenia 140 48 South Africa 143 49 South Korea 144 50 Spain 146 51 Sri Lanka 150 52 Sweden 151 53 Switzerland 154 54 Turkey 158 55 Ukraine 161 56 United Kingdom 165 57 United States 167 2 Manifesto Project Dataset List of coded documents Version 2015a 1 Albania 75220 PSS Albanian Socialist Party year title 1991 Programme of the Party of Labour of Albania (PLA) 1992 Electoral Programme 1996 ‘Bashkë me ne për një demokraci të vërtetë’ 1997 ‘Te ndryshojme te sotmen, te garantojme te nesermen’ 2001 No information about title 75320 PSD Social Democratic
    [Show full text]