DOCSLIB.ORG

Democracy Democra

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

INTRA-PARTYINTRA-PARTY HOW TO MAKE HOW DEMOCRACYTO MAKE DEMOCRACY POSSIBLE?POSSIBLE? INSTITUTIONALINSTITUTIONAL FACTORS FACTORS ANDAND INTERNAL INTERNAL DYNAMICS DYNAMICS OF INTRA-PARTYOF INTRA-PARTY RELATIONS RELATIONS HOW TO MAKE INTRAPARTY DEMOCRACY POSSIBLE? Ova Zbirka je izrađena u okviru projekta “Podrška upravljanju migracijama u Crnoj Gori”. Projekat finansira Evropska unija posredstvom Delegacije EU u Crnoj Gori. Publikacija ne sadrži formalno saopštenje i ne predstavlja nužno službeni stav Evropske unije. INTRA-PARTY HOW TO MAKE DEMOCRACY POSSIBLE? INSTITUTIONAL FACTORS AND INTERNAL DYNAMICS OF INTRA-PARTY RELATIONS HOW TO MAKE INTRA-PARTY DEMOCRACY POSSIBLE? INSTITUTIONAL FACTORS AND INTERNAL DYNAMICS OF INTRA-PARTY RELATIONS IN SERBIA HOW TO MAKE INTRa-pARTY DEMOCRACY POSSIBLE? INSTITUTIONAL FACTORS AND INTERNAL DYNAMICS OF INTRa-pARTY RELATIONS IN SERBIA Publisher: Faculty of Political Sciences, University of Belgrade Center for monitoring and Research CeMI Podgorica For publisher: Ili ja Vu ja čić Zlatko Vujović Editors: Zoran Stojiljković Dušan Spasojević Jelena Lončar Reviewers: Vu ka šin Pa vlo vić Če do mir Ču pić Đor đe Vu ko vić Layout and print: Slu žbe ni gla snik Circulation: 300 ISBN: 978-86-6425-006-1 DISCLAIMER: The RRPP promotes social science research in the Western Balkans (Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia). Social science research aids in the understanding of the specific reform needs of countries in the region and in identifying the long-term implications of policy choices. Researchers receive support through research grants, methodological and thematic trainings as well as opportunities for regional and international networking and mentoring. The RRPP is coordinated and operated by the Interfaculty Institute for Central and Eastern Europe (IICEE) at the University of Fribourg (Switzerland). The programme is fully funded by the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC), Federal Department of Foreign Affairs. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent opinions of the SDC and the University of Fribourg. Editors Zo ran Sto jilj ko vić Du šan Spa so je vić Je le na Lon čar HOW TO MAKE INTRA-PARTY DEMOCRACY POSSIBLE? INSTITUTIONAL FACTORS AND INTERNAL DYNAMICS OF INTRA-PARTY RELATIONS IN SERBIA Belgrade, 2015 CONTENTS: Introduction . 7 1. CONSTITUTIONAL-INSTITUTIONAL DESIGN OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA Sla vi ša Or lo vić . 9 2. ThE ELECTORAL SYSTEM OF SERBIA Mi lan Jo va no vić . 27 3. SERBIAN PARTY SYSTEM Zo ran Sto jilj ko vić and Du šan Spa so je vić . 49 4. INTRA-PARTY DEMOCRACY IN SERBIA Zo ran Sto jilj ko vić, Vo ji slav Mi ha i lo vić and Du šan Spa so je vić . 69 5. ELECTORAL CAMPAIGNS IN SERBIA FROM 2000 TO 2014 Je le na Lon čar and Bo ban Sto ja no vić . 87 References . 110 List of tables and figures . 119 List of abbreviations . 120 Contributors . 121 5 IntRODUction This volume presents the first results within the regional research project Balkan Electoral Comparative study: Impact of personal vote on Internal party democracy . It is connected to the binary study we prepared with the colleagues from Montenegro . The Balkan Electoral Comparative Study is an international research project carried out within the RRPP – Regional Research Promotion Program in the field of social sciences at the Western Balkans conducted by CeMI from Podgorica, Faculty of Political Sciences from Belgrade, Kipred form Pristina and group of researchers from Sarajevo . The main goal of the Study is to test the hypothesis about the dependence between personalization of politics (in the actual case, the personalized electoral system) and intraparty democracy in the transitional, post-Yugoslav and post-communist context . The primary aim of this volume is to offer an analytical and theoretical context for interpretation of findings from the empirical Comparative Candidate Study, which we presented in the binary study . In addition, it aims to serve as an extensive review of the previous research studies carried out in Serbia, which are relevant for our research questions . Therefore the main idea and intention of this volume is to connect and present the most important findings on determinants of intraparty relations and dynamics in Serbia after the October 5th . This topic is becoming increasingly intriguing due to the increased awareness of political parties as the supreme actors which by usurpation of the decision- making process slow down and prevent further democratization of the Western Balkan countries . However, our research should not be understood as „witch-hunt“ but as an attempt to observe, through in-depth analyses, the mutually invigorating mechanisms preventing the power to be displaced from political parties and moved to the institutions of political system and the formation of common democratic mechanisms of division and mutual control and limitation of power . In that sense this research is the continuance of several previous research projects focused on strengthening of the parliament and its oversight capacities (for example, see our previous study within the RRPP program: „Democratic Performances of the Parliaments of Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina and Montenegro“) . The volume is divided into five parts . The first two parts are dealing with institutional design as the basic determinant of political behaviour – political and electoral system . In the first chapter entitled “Constitutional-Institutional Design of the Republic of Serbia”, Slaviša Orlović analyses the main foundations of the political system and their influence on political behaviour . The analysis particularly emphasises an unfavourable influence of political legacy and points to the obstacles in democratisation which Serbia faced with . Besides, the author pays attention to newly established institutions (such are the regulatory and control bodies) and their importance in the process of democratic consolidation . 7 How to make intra-party democracy possible? Another text, by the author Milan N . Jovanović, focuses on the electoral system, which is at the same time the central institutional dimension of our research . This chapter offers a detailed genesis of the electoral system (accompanied by the argumentation of changes pointing to the intentions of political actors), but the emphasis is on the political consequences of the adopted solutions . The author also points to the influences of international actors on the internal institutional design . Through three main conclusions, Jovanović points that Serbian model of proportional representation favours the dependence between the MPs and the party leader, and that it directs the identification of voters towards leaders, thus not stimulating the democratic intraparty dynamics while leading the system towards an uneven geographic representativeness of the parliament . This yields the instability of the party system as a consequence . These conclusions can be interpreted also as a framework of the next chapter in which Zoran Stojiljković and Dušan Spasojević analyse the party system of Serbia both at the system level and at the level of individual parties . By using the methodological approaches adjusted to transitional societies, the authors point to the elements of stability and continuity in a very changeable political life of Serbia, as well as to possible sources of gradual institutionalisation and consolidation of the party system . If we labelled the chapter on the electoral system as the main institutional vertical, than the fourth chapter entitled “Intraparty Democracy” is the theoretical framework of the entire project . The chapter starts with the development of research models and indicators and their adjustments to new and unconsolidated party system, with the aim to apply these indicators in the subsequent analysis of intraparty relations in Serbia . This analysis encompasses both the formal (legal and statutory) and practical approaches . The authors (Zoran Stojiljković, Vojislav Mihailović and Dušan Spasojević) in this chapter (as expected) conclude that the majority of parties in Serbia do not have a rich democratic practice, but that they are dominantly organised upon the leadership party model . A particularly dangerous seems the fact that this situation is not a product of a single factor, but of a synergy of institutional, value and historical influences, and the fact that non-democratic management of the parties is being transmitted and established as the management model in public institutions . Finally, in the last, fifth chapter, Jelena Lončar and Boban Stojanović offer a review of electoral campaigns in the last 15 years with an aim of pointing to two main problems – the low level of ideological differentiation of parties and large importance of leaders in the campaigns . Without such insight it would be difficult to entirely understand the level of identification of voters with leaders and the parallel incapacity of a large number of party cadres to profile themselves in terms of programme or policy issues and create a recognisable image in the political public . Zo ran Sto jilj ko vić Du šan Spa so je vić 8 Slaviša Orlović PART ONE CONSTITUTIONAL- -INSTITUTIONAL DESIGN OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA Institutional factors and internal dynamics of intra-party relations in Serbia Sla vi ša Or lo vić University of Belgrade Faculty of Political Sciences ConstitUtionAL- -InstitUtionAL DesiGN OF THE RePUBLic OF SERBIA Table 1. The identity card of Serbia State/Characteristics
Recommended publications
  • Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia HUMAN RIGHTS AND

    Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia HUMAN RIGHTS AND

    Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia HUMAN RIGHTS AND ACCOUNTABILITY Serbia 2003 0 1 Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia HUMAN RIGHTS AND ACCOUNTABILITY Serbia 2003 Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia PUBLISHER: Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia FOR PUBLISHER: Sonja Biserko * * * TRANSLATED BY: Ivana Damjanovic Dragan Novakovic Spomenka Grujicic LAYOUT BY: Nebojsa Tasic HUMAN RIGHTS COVER DESIGNE: Ivan Hrasovec AND PRINTED BY: "Zagorac", Belgrade 2004 ACCOUNTABILITY NUMBER OF COPIES: 500 - Serbia 2003 - ISBN - 86-7208-090-4 This book was published thanks to the support of the Swedish Helsinki Committee for Human Rights Belgrade, 2004 2 3 Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia I am here to work for you and in behalf of you. But I cannot work instead of you. Zoran Djindjic 4 5 Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia Introduction The Premier Zoran Djindjic assassination not only marked the year 2003 but will also – judging by ongoing developments – face Serbia with a historical crossroads: with one road leading towards Europe and another away from it. The murder of a reformist premier stalled reforms and put an end to the cooperation with The Hague Tribunal. And, moreover, it opened the door to Serbia’s radicalization. The DOS coalition's incapability and unwillingness to make a break with Milosevic’s policy, particularly the warring one, gave scope to restoration of the ancien regime that triumphed in the early parliamentary election.
  • Let the Talks Begin the EU Formally Opens Association Talks with Serbia and Montenegro

    Let the Talks Begin the EU Formally Opens Association Talks with Serbia and Montenegro

    Let the Talks Begin The EU formally opens association talks with Serbia and Montenegro. But will one country or two be doing the talking? Transitions Online by Igor Jovanovic 13 October 2005 BELGRADE, Serbia and Montenegro The European Union has formally opened talks on strengthening ties with Serbia and Montenegro. The way is now clear for Belgrade to move toward completing a Stabilization and Association Agreement (SAA) with the EU. "The agreement will deepen relations and create contractual relations between the EU and Serbia-Montenegro. It is a crucial step forward on Serbia-Montenegro's path to the EU," EU enlargement commissioner Olli Rehn told top officials gathered for the ceremonial opening on 10 October. Technical talks are expected to begin in late October or early November. The visit to Belgrade capped a week of frantic diplomatic activity in the Balkans: on 3 October, EU foreign ministers decided to open full membership talks with Croatia; on 5 October, the parliament of one of Bosnia's two constituent parts, Republika Srpska, caved in to international pressure and passed a controversial police reform package that now makes Bosnia's SAA talks possible; and two days after that, UN special envoy Kai Eide recommended early negotiations to settle the final status of Kosovo, nominally still a province of Serbia. A unique feature of the EU's integration process with Serbia and Montenegro is the constitutional makeup of the uneasy state union of the two republics of Serbia and Montenegro, which gives most authority to the republics. A year ago, EU foreign ministers decided to deal separately with the republics on economic issues while talking with state union leaders on overall political integration.
  • Macro Report Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 4: Macro Report September 10, 2012

    Macro Report Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 4: Macro Report September 10, 2012

    Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 1 Module 4: Macro Report Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 4: Macro Report September 10, 2012 Country: Serbia Date of Election: May 6, 2012 (Parliamentary and first round presidential); May 20, 2012 - second round presidential Prepared by: Bojan Todosijević Date of Preparation: 05. 08. 2013. NOTES TO COLLABORATORS: ° The information provided in this report contributes to an important part of the CSES project. The information may be filled out by yourself, or by an expert or experts of your choice. Your efforts in providing these data are greatly appreciated! Any supplementary documents that you can provide (e.g., electoral legislation, party manifestos, electoral commission reports, media reports) are also appreciated, and may be made available on the CSES website. ° Answers should be as of the date of the election being studied. ° Where brackets [ ] appear, collaborators should answer by placing an “X” within the appropriate bracket or brackets. For example: [X] ° If more space is needed to answer any question, please lengthen the document as necessary. Data Pertinent to the Election at which the Module was Administered 1a. Type of Election [ ] Parliamentary/Legislative [X] Parliamentary/Legislative and Presidential [ ] Presidential [ ] Other; please specify: __________ 1b. If the type of election in Question 1a included Parliamentary/Legislative, was the election for the Upper House, Lower House, or both? [ X] Upper House [ ] Lower House [ ] Both [ ] Other; please specify: __________ Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 2 Module 4: Macro Report 2a. What was the party of the president prior to the most recent election, regardless of whether the election was presidential? Democratic Party (Demokratska stranka, DS) 2b.
  • Liberal Parties in Europe and Human Rights Emphasis

    Liberal Parties in Europe and Human Rights Emphasis

    LIBERAL PARTIES IN EUROPE AND HUMAN RIGHTS EMPHASIS by ŞEYMA KOÇ Submitted to the Graduate School of Social Sciences in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Sabancı University August 2020 LIBERAL PARTIES IN EUROPE AND HUMAN RIGHTS EMPHASIS Approved by: Assoc. Prof Özge Kemahlıoğlu . (Thesis Supervisor) Prof. Ali Çarkoğlu . Asst. Prof. Mert Moral . Date of Approval: August 5, 2020 ŞEYMA KOÇ 2020 c All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT LIBERAL PARTIES IN EUROPE AND HUMAN RIGHTS EMPHASIS ŞEYMA KOÇ POLITICAL SCIENCE M.A. THESIS, AUGUST 2020 Thesis Supervisor: Assoc.Prof. Özge Kemahlıoğlu Keywords: Political Parties, Liberal Party Family, Human Rights Emphasis, Economic Conditions Liberal parties are mostly neglected by the literature on political parties despite their central role in establishing European liberal democracies. This thesis aims to contribute to the contemporary literature on liberal parties by examining 33 Eu- ropean democracies and covering a time period including observations of 75 years. The empirical analysis shows that liberal parties are distinguishable from the other party families on their emphasis on human rights and freedom. Then, this thesis investigates the impact of economic conditions on liberal parties’ relative emphasis on human rights and freedom. The findings illustrate that higher levels of unemploy- ment rate decrease liberal parties’ relative emphasis on human rights and freedom and increase their relative emphasis on economic issues. Its effect on the relative em- phasis on human rights and freedom issue and economic issues is substantive when the distributions of the dependent variables are considered. This finding may demon- strate the liberal parties’ responsiveness to changing needs of the electorate and a value change in politics too.
  • Religious Diversity and the Number of Religious Parties Around the World

    Religious Diversity and the Number of Religious Parties Around the World

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Queen's University Research Portal Religious Diversity and the Number of Religious Parties Around the World Raymond, C. (2018). Religious Diversity and the Number of Religious Parties Around the World. Paper presented at European Consortium for Political Research General Conference, Hamburg, Germany. Document Version: Other version Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights Copyright 2018 The Author. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected]. Download date:09. May. 2019 Religious Diversity and the Number of Religious Parties Around the World Christopher D. Raymond Lecturer in Politics Queen’s University Belfast [email protected] Key Words Religious parties; religious diversity; religious markets; party system fragmentation; social cleavages Abstract Arguing that religious diversity creates incentives for political cooperation, recent research questions the assumption that religious diversity leads to more fragmented party systems and finds a negative association between religious diversity and the fragmentation of vote shares.
  • Serbia in 2001 Under the Spotlight

    Serbia in 2001 Under the Spotlight

    1 Human Rights in Transition – Serbia 2001 Introduction The situation of human rights in Serbia was largely influenced by the foregoing circumstances. Although the severe repression characteristic especially of the last two years of Milosevic’s rule was gone, there were no conditions in place for dealing with the problems accumulated during the previous decade. All the mechanisms necessary to ensure the exercise of human rights - from the judiciary to the police, remained unchanged. However, the major concern of citizens is the mere existential survival and personal security. Furthermore, the general atmosphere in the society was just as xenophobic and intolerant as before. The identity crisis of the Serb people and of all minorities living in Serbia continued. If anything, it deepened and the relationship between the state and its citizens became seriously jeopardized by the problem of Serbia’s undefined borders. The crisis was manifest with regard to certain minorities such as Vlachs who were believed to have been successfully assimilated. This false belief was partly due to the fact that neighbouring Romania had been in a far worse situation than Yugoslavia during the past fifty years. In considerably changed situation in Romania and Serbia Vlachs are now undergoing the process of self identification though still unclear whether they would choose to call themselves Vlachs or Romanians-Vlachs. Considering that the international factor has become the main generator of change in Serbia, the Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia believes that an accurate picture of the situation in Serbia is absolutely necessary. It is essential to establish the differences between Belgrade and the rest of Serbia, taking into account its internal diversities.
  • The Ethics of a Justice Imposed: Ratko Mladic's Arrest and The

    The Ethics of a Justice Imposed: Ratko Mladic's Arrest and The

    The Ethics of a Justice Imposed: Ratko Mladic's Arrest and the... http://www.carnegiecouncil.org/publications/ethics_online/0058... The Ethics of a Justice Imposed: Ratko Mladic's Arrest and the Costs of Conditionality Marlene Spoerri , Mladen Joksic It has been 16 years since the Bosniac population of Srebrenica—a small town in eastern Bosnia—was systematically annihilated in a brutal campaign of genocide and ethnic cleansing. Over the course of several weeks, more than 8,000 people were slaughtered. The victims of Srebrenica were largely, but not exclusively, men. Some had their throats slit. Most were shot with a single gunshot to the head. Of those killed, 500 were young boys under the age of 18—some not CREDIT: Marlene Spoerri old enough to have taken their first step. Among those murdered, several dozen were women and girls. Of the survivors, many were raped and thousands were left without fathers, brothers, and sons. The arrest of Ratko Mladic, the former Bosnian Serb general accused of implementing the genocidal assault on Srebrenica, marks the closing of a difficult chapter in Serbia's history. Driven largely by foreign policymakers who have sought to condition Serbia's Euro-Atlantic integration on the arrest and extradition of suspected war criminals, Mladic's arrest adds to a long list of former presidents, prime ministers, and generals that Serbia has apprehended over the course of the past decade. Unfortunately, if promises of lucrative loans, visa-free travel, and EU membership have succeeded in driving Serbia's compliance with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), material incentives have had far less success in inciting a process of societal self-reflection.
  • The Success and Failure of Ethnic Parties in New Democracies: Cross-National and Inter-Temporal Analysis on Post-Communist Europe

    The Success and Failure of Ethnic Parties in New Democracies: Cross-National and Inter-Temporal Analysis on Post-Communist Europe

    G-COE GLOPE II Working Paper Series The Success and Failure of Ethnic Parties in New Democracies: Cross-National and Inter-temporal Analysis on Post-communist Europe. Ryo NAKAI Working Paper No.27 If you have any comment or question on the working paper series, please contact each author. When making a copy or reproduction of the content, please contact us in advance to request permission. The source should explicitly be credited. GLOPE Ⅱ Web Site: http://globalcoe-glope2.jp/ The Success and Failure of Ethnic Parties in New Democracies: 1 Cross-National and Inter-temporal Analysis on Post-communist Europe Ryo NAKAI Research Associate & Ph.D. Candidate Student, School of Political Science and Economics 2 [email protected] Abstract Why do ethnic minority parties succeed or fail? In order to solve this puzzle, this article explores cross-national and inter-temporal differences in post-communist new democracies using statistical analysis and small-N case studies, and argues that policy factors and the rationality of ethnic minorities determine the success and failure of ethnic parties and account for the variance in their standings. As some studies have pointed out, ethnic minorities’ voting behaviour should be rational and strategic. This article represents a basic spatial model and argues that ethnic minorities react to other parties’ policy changes and to the capability of other parties to win seats. Statistical analysis verifies this hypothesis. In addition, I discuss the Baltic States–Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania--as case studies. Although these three countries share a similar history, experience with minority issues and a common institutional design, their party systems indicate significant differences.
  • SE Weekly Mar 14 20.Pdf

    SE Weekly Mar 14 20.Pdf

    Weekly Review // March 14 - 20 SOUTHEASTERN EUROPE Observatory The Southeastern Europe Intelligence Unit is formed by an ambitious group of young scientists which focuses on the political, economic, defense and security developments in the wider region of Southeastern Europe. Our main task is the “Southeastern Europe Observatory” to become a credible, detailed, objective and flexible “tool” of information and short analysis in the hands of the researcher and the professional who is interested in the current affairs of this sensitive and crucial part of the European continent. In each weekly review, you will find the most significant news of the previous week in the region. SPECIAL COUNTRY REPORT: Turkey Kurds clash with police at Newroz - a cultural or a political suppression? very year March 21, millions of Kurds across the world celebrate Newroz, which refers to the beginning of the New Year for the Kurdish people. Meaning ‘the new day’ in Kurdish language, Newroz represents the beginning of Spring and the starts of the New EYear. Members of the pro-Kurdish party BDP (Peace and Democracy Party) applied for permission to spread their fests to the days of 17-21 March as they have been doing in previous years. However, this year, the Ministry of the Interior denied permission for the earlier start of Newroz celebrations before the 21st, strictly prohibiting any activity on March 18. The ban arrived soon after the president of the BDP, Selahattin Demirtas declared the official celebrations shall take place on Sunday the 18th, instead of Monday 21st. Despite the bans, Newroz celebrations took place in Van, Hakkari, Siirt, Mus, Diyarbakır, Instabul and Ankara.
  • Serbia's U-Turn

    Serbia's U-Turn

    SERBIA'S U-TURN 26 March 2004 Europe Report N°154 Belgrade/Brussels TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................. i I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 II. KOSOVO FRUSTRATIONS ........................................................................................ 2 III. ELECTION FALLOUT................................................................................................. 4 A. THE EMPIRE STRIKES BACK..................................................................................................4 B. THE SRS AND SPS: WARTIME NATIONALISTS ......................................................................5 C. RIGHT-WING POPULISTS: DSS, SPO AND NS .........................................................................6 IV. HOW DID IT HAPPEN? ............................................................................................... 7 A. NO ONE TO BLAME BUT THEMSELVES .................................................................................7 B. INTERNATIONAL MISCALCULATIONS ....................................................................................9 V. FORMING A GOVERNMENT .................................................................................. 11 VI. TRENDS ........................................................................................................................ 12 A. IMPLICATIONS OF KOSOVO..................................................................................................14
  • Religious Diversity and the Number of Religious Parties Around the World

    Religious Diversity and the Number of Religious Parties Around the World

    Religious Diversity and the Number of Religious Parties Around the World Raymond, C. (2018). Religious Diversity and the Number of Religious Parties Around the World. Paper presented at European Consortium for Political Research General Conference, Hamburg, Germany. Document Version: Other version Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights Copyright 2018 The Author. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected]. Download date:26. Sep. 2021 Religious Diversity and the Number of Religious Parties Around the World Christopher D. Raymond Lecturer in Politics Queen’s University Belfast [email protected] Key Words Religious parties; religious diversity; religious markets; party system fragmentation; social cleavages Abstract Arguing that religious diversity creates incentives for political cooperation, recent research questions the assumption that religious diversity leads to more fragmented party systems and finds a negative association between religious diversity and the fragmentation of vote shares.
  • Roma Participation in Elections in South-Eastern Europe 2003 – 2005

    Roma Participation in Elections in South-Eastern Europe 2003 – 2005

    Contact Point for Roma and Sinti Issues Briefing Paper Joint European Commission and OSCE ODIHR Programme: “Roma use you ballot wisely!” Country Profiles: Roma Participation in Elections in South-Eastern Europe 2003 – 2005 Warsaw, December 2006 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................... 3 COUNTRY PROFILES ............................................................................................................. 5 Albania ............................................................................................................................... 5 Bosnia and Herzegovina..................................................................................................... 8 Bulgaria ............................................................................................................................ 11 Croatia .............................................................................................................................. 16 Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia ....................................................................... 19 Moldova ........................................................................................................................... 23 Romania ........................................................................................................................... 26 Serbia and Montenegro ...................................................................................................