Serbia in 2001 Under the Spotlight

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Serbia in 2001 Under the Spotlight 1 Human Rights in Transition – Serbia 2001 Introduction The situation of human rights in Serbia was largely influenced by the foregoing circumstances. Although the severe repression characteristic especially of the last two years of Milosevic’s rule was gone, there were no conditions in place for dealing with the problems accumulated during the previous decade. All the mechanisms necessary to ensure the exercise of human rights - from the judiciary to the police, remained unchanged. However, the major concern of citizens is the mere existential survival and personal security. Furthermore, the general atmosphere in the society was just as xenophobic and intolerant as before. The identity crisis of the Serb people and of all minorities living in Serbia continued. If anything, it deepened and the relationship between the state and its citizens became seriously jeopardized by the problem of Serbia’s undefined borders. The crisis was manifest with regard to certain minorities such as Vlachs who were believed to have been successfully assimilated. This false belief was partly due to the fact that neighbouring Romania had been in a far worse situation than Yugoslavia during the past fifty years. In considerably changed situation in Romania and Serbia Vlachs are now undergoing the process of self identification though still unclear whether they would choose to call themselves Vlachs or Romanians-Vlachs. Considering that the international factor has become the main generator of change in Serbia, the Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia believes that an accurate picture of the situation in Serbia is absolutely necessary. It is essential to establish the differences between Belgrade and the rest of Serbia, taking into account its internal diversities. Serbia’s distinct regional character resulting from her historical heritage must be built into a strategy of Serbia’s development. At this moment it is essential to define the crux of the problem in order to lay the fundamentals for change. After 11 September human rights have gained on importance in the sphere of defence of freedoms and values that the human right concept advocates. Terrorism has only revealed vulnerability of modern world and its values and, at the same time, has emphasised the reasons for intensifying support to democratisation in the states and regions, which through repressive measures deny human rights and very often constitute the breeding ground for all kinds of radicalisms. 11 September has also laid bare the mind set in Serbia. On the one hand, the authorities have condemned terrorism and tried to “market” its “war campaigns in Kosovo and Bosnia and Herzegovina” as the fight against Islamic terrorism, while, on the other hand, an obvious support to Bin Laden was rather an expression of anti-Americanism and anti-globalisation. Emergence of clandestine organisation “Gavrilo Princip” which has sent threatening letters to all prominent Serbs in Sarajevo, as well as to individuals in Serbia, is indicative of potential radicalisation in Serbia proper. The removal of Slobodan Milosevic had created the conditions for constructing a framework for much-needed transition, as well as laid bare the gravity of the problems in hand and the extent to which the society and its institutions had been devastated. Although the absence of any substantial headway in the past year can be attributed to the ruinous legacy, no serious effort was made to take stock of the policy of the Milosevic regime in order to break away from it. Co- operation with the Hague Tribunal was the best indicator of how much progress the ruling Democratic Opposition of Serbia (DOS) made in that direction: Milosevic was handed over to the Hague Tribunal as a result of pressure from the international community, especially the US Congress, and of activities of Carla del Ponte herself. The expectations that pressure on the new government to co-operate with the Tribunal would abate once Milosevic had been transferred to The Hague proved yet another illusion, based more on wishful thinking than on an appraisal of the new circumstances, especially those after September 11. The indictment of Slobodan Milosevic for crimes committed in Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina and Kosovo, including genocide, defines the character of the war in the past decade. As well as implicating Milosevic personally, the indictment spells out the war policy and names all its bearers, thus ending a phase of relativizing and equating the culpability of all the protagonists in the former Yugoslavia. As a result, the various Serb elites, who had hitherto looked upon Milosevic as a scapegoat, modified their attitude and now regard his trial as »the writing of the ongoing political history of the region«. As Dragoljub Micunovic, Speaker of the Federal Parliament, said, »we cannot watch disinterestedly as Slobodan Milosevic wages a private war at The Hague... After all, we as a state are part of that indictment«. 1 2 The dragging of feet on passing a law on co-operation with the Hague Tribunal was largely due to a disinclination to co-operate with it and indicated the correlation of forces as regards the matter. The growing pressure of individual Western governments and international organizations alike, as well as of the Tribunal itself, brought about a crisis within the DOS in which only individuals exhibited a clear attitude towards the Tribunal. This is partly understandable considering that the majority of the parties forming the ruling coalition supported and helped to implement the Greater Serbia policy, and that their criticism of Milosevic centred mostly on his failures and capitulation. Vojislav Kostunica, the president of the FRY, set up a State Truth and Reconciliation Commission in March, at the height of US Congress pressure aiming to make assistance to Serbia conditional on her co-operation with the Tribunal. Rather than striving after genuine confrontation with the recent past, the Commission in the past year sought - judging by statements by some of its members as well as of the president himself - to interpret the events from a Serb point of view. It is interesting to note that Milan Milutinovic, the president of Serbia himself indicted for war crimes and sought by the Hague Tribunal, pardoned a number of prisoners on Republic Day, a paradox that failed to provoke any public reaction. The past continued to be ignored as a matter of course and it was mostly under outside provocation that any action was taken. As a result of the absence of political will on the part of state authorities to sanction war crimes legally, the question of culpability and responsibility was narrowed and sidelined. With the internal potentials of the state at their lowest ebb ever, no radical reform was possible without international credibility. The attitude towards war crimes was essentially a measure of a genuine break with past policy. Given the manipulations and scheming of the state authorities and the prevailing attitudes in Serbia, it is hard to imagine that the question of culpability and responsibility can be addressed outside the Hague Tribunal. The DOS had come to power on the strength of only one demand, namely the removal of Milosevic. The take-over was helped by the international situation and the internal consensus that Milosevic must go. The election of Vojislav Kostunica as president was not accidental, for it was calculated at perpetuating the very policy whose aim was the creation of a Greater Serbia. From this point of view, the survival of the FRY could be viewed merely as a stepping stone towards the realization of that project, with Vojislav Kostunica, once a most fervent opponent of the Yugoslav state, himself regarding the FRY as a means to an end. No sooner was he in office than he nailed his colours firmly to the mast on the question of Republika Srpska, Montenegro, and Kosovo, there being no difference whatever between his position and that of the previous regime. What is more, the rhetoric of Kostunica’s messages was far less ambiguous, a fact especially appreciated in Republika Srpska and resulting in a far more cordial relationship then under the former regime. With regard to Montenegro, Kostunica chose not to employ the Army directly, finding it more advantageous for the time being to subject the republic to pressure through the Serbian Orthodox Church (SPC), the most dogmatic segment of the Montenegrin political scene staunchly loyal to Slobodan Milosevic throughout the past ten years, and certain pro-Serb Montenegrins such as the academicians Matija Beckovic and Ljubomir Tadic. All of them were actively engaged in exacerbating divisions in Montenegro along tribal lines. However, in spite of enormous international pressure, the independent bloc won the election thanks to support from the Montenegrin elite and the younger generations. In the long term, the process of emancipation of Montenegro is an irreversible process and it only remains to be seen what form of disintegration Yugoslavia will undergo. The “normalization” of Serb nationalism and its democratic legitimation enjoyed Western public support during the first months of the DOS’s rule. However, during the first years of its rule, the DOS failed to establish itself as a political grouping of much relevance because it proved unwilling to confront the past, i.e. not only the war crimes but also corruption and the re- organization of Serbia as a whole. Every single step it did was forced from abroad and made conditional on financial aid. The biggest changes took place at the international level, the international community having decided to readmit the FRY to the United Nations, the OSCE and a number of other organizations as a matter of urgency. The rationale behind this policy should be attributed to a desire to prevent the collapse of Serbia and to accelerate her consolidation, though this was achieved only partially.
Recommended publications
  • FEEFHS Journal Volume VII No. 1-2 1999
    FEEFHS Quarterly A Journal of Central & Bast European Genealogical Studies FEEFHS Quarterly Volume 7, nos. 1-2 FEEFHS Quarterly Who, What and Why is FEEFHS? Tue Federation of East European Family History Societies Editor: Thomas K. Ecllund. [email protected] (FEEFHS) was founded in June 1992 by a small dedicated group Managing Editor: Joseph B. Everett. [email protected] of American and Canadian genealogists with diverse ethnic, reli- Contributing Editors: Shon Edwards gious, and national backgrounds. By the end of that year, eleven Daniel Schlyter societies bad accepted its concept as founding members. Each year Emily Schulz since then FEEFHS has doubled in size. FEEFHS nows represents nearly two hundred organizations as members from twenty-four FEEFHS Executive Council: states, five Canadian provinces, and fourteen countries. lt contin- 1998-1999 FEEFHS officers: ues to grow. President: John D. Movius, c/o FEEFHS (address listed below). About half of these are genealogy societies, others are multi-pur- [email protected] pose societies, surname associations, book or periodical publish- 1st Vice-president: Duncan Gardiner, C.G., 12961 Lake Ave., ers, archives, libraries, family history centers, on-line services, in- Lakewood, OH 44107-1533. [email protected] stitutions, e-mail genealogy list-servers, heraldry societies, and 2nd Vice-president: Laura Hanowski, c/o Saskatchewan Genealogi- other ethnic, religious, and national groups. FEEFHS includes or- cal Society, P.0. Box 1894, Regina, SK, Canada S4P 3EI ganizations representing all East or Central European groups that [email protected] have existing genealogy societies in North America and a growing 3rd Vice-president: Blanche Krbechek, 2041 Orkla Drive, group of worldwide organizations and individual members, from Minneapolis, MN 55427-3429.
    [Show full text]
  • Snow Man and Bait by David Albahari
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-2006 Politics of Representations: Snow Man and Bait by David Albahari Damjana Mraovic University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Mraovic, Damjana, "Politics of Representations: Snow Man and Bait by David Albahari. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2006. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/1746 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Damjana Mraovic entitled "Politics of Representations: Snow Man and Bait by David Albahari." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in English. Amy Elias, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Allen Dunn, Lisi M. Schoenbach Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Damjana Mraović entitled “Politics of Representations: Snow Man and Bait by David Albahari.” I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts, with a major in English.
    [Show full text]
  • Writing Alberta POD EPDF.Indd
    WRITING ALBERTA: Aberta Building on a Literary Identity Edited by George Melnyk and Donna Coates ISBN 978-1-55238-891-4 THIS BOOK IS AN OPEN ACCESS E-BOOK. It is an electronic version of a book that can be purchased in physical form through any bookseller or on-line retailer, or from our distributors. Please support this open access publication by requesting that your university purchase a print copy of this book, or by purchasing a copy yourself. If you have any questions, please contact us at [email protected] Cover Art: The artwork on the cover of this book is not open access and falls under traditional copyright provisions; it cannot be reproduced in any way without written permission of the artists and their agents. The cover can be displayed as a complete cover image for the purposes of publicizing this work, but the artwork cannot be extracted from the context of the cover of this specific work without breaching the artist’s copyright. COPYRIGHT NOTICE: This open-access work is published under a Creative Commons licence. This means that you are free to copy, distribute, display or perform the work as long as you clearly attribute the work to its authors and publisher, that you do not use this work for any commercial gain in any form, and that you in no way alter, transform, or build on the work outside of its use in normal academic scholarship without our express permission. If you want to reuse or distribute the work, you must inform its new audience of the licence terms of this work.
    [Show full text]
  • CAUSES of WORLD WAR I Objective: Analyze the Causes of World War I
    CAUSES of WORLD WAR I Objective: Analyze the causes of World War I. Do Now: What are some holidays during which people celebrate pride in their national heritage? Causes of World War I - MANIA M ilitarism – policy of building up strong military forces to prepare for war Alliances - agreements between nations to aid and protect one another ationalism – pride in or devotion to one’s Ncountry I mperialism – when one country takes over another country economically and politically Assassination – murder of Austrian Archduke Franz Ferdinand Causes of WWI - Militarism Total Defense Expenditures for the Great Powers [Ger., A-H, It., Fr., Br., Rus.] in millions of £s (British pounds). 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1914 94 130 154 268 289 398 1910-1914 Increase in Defense Expenditures France 10% Britain 13% Russia 39% Germany 73% Causes of WWI - Alliances Triple Entente: Triple Alliance: Great Britain Germany France Austria-Hungary Russia Italy Causes of WWI - Nationalism Causes of WWI - Nationalism Pan-Germanism - movement to unify the people of all German speaking countries Germanic Countries Austria * Luxembourg Belgium Netherlands Denmark Norway Iceland Sweden Germany * Switzerland * Liechtenstein United * Kingdom * = German speaking country Causes of WWI - Nationalism Pan-Slavism - movement to unify all of the Slavic people Imperialism: European conquest of Africa Causes of WWI - Imperialism Causes of WWI - Imperialism The “Spark” Causes of WWI - Assassination Austrian Archduke Franz Ferdinand visited the city of Sarajevo in Bosnia – a country that was under the control of Austria. Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife Duchess Sophie in Sarajevo, Bosnia, on June 28th, 1914. Causes of WWI - Assassination Austrian Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife were killed in Bosnia by a Serbian nationalist who believed that Bosnia should belong to Serbia.
    [Show full text]
  • UNDER ORDERS: War Crimes in Kosovo Order Online
    UNDER ORDERS: War Crimes in Kosovo Order online Table of Contents Acknowledgments Introduction Glossary 1. Executive Summary The 1999 Offensive The Chain of Command The War Crimes Tribunal Abuses by the KLA Role of the International Community 2. Background Introduction Brief History of the Kosovo Conflict Kosovo in the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Kosovo in the 1990s The 1998 Armed Conflict Conclusion 3. Forces of the Conflict Forces of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Yugoslav Army Serbian Ministry of Internal Affairs Paramilitaries Chain of Command and Superior Responsibility Stucture and Strategy of the KLA Appendix: Post-War Promotions of Serbian Police and Yugoslav Army Members 4. march–june 1999: An Overview The Geography of Abuses The Killings Death Toll,the Missing and Body Removal Targeted Killings Rape and Sexual Assault Forced Expulsions Arbitrary Arrests and Detentions Destruction of Civilian Property and Mosques Contamination of Water Wells Robbery and Extortion Detentions and Compulsory Labor 1 Human Shields Landmines 5. Drenica Region Izbica Rezala Poklek Staro Cikatovo The April 30 Offensive Vrbovac Stutica Baks The Cirez Mosque The Shavarina Mine Detention and Interrogation in Glogovac Detention and Compusory Labor Glogovac Town Killing of Civilians Detention and Abuse Forced Expulsion 6. Djakovica Municipality Djakovica City Phase One—March 24 to April 2 Phase Two—March 7 to March 13 The Withdrawal Meja Motives: Five Policeman Killed Perpetrators Korenica 7. Istok Municipality Dubrava Prison The Prison The NATO Bombing The Massacre The Exhumations Perpetrators 8. Lipljan Municipality Slovinje Perpetrators 9. Orahovac Municipality Pusto Selo 10. Pec Municipality Pec City The “Cleansing” Looting and Burning A Final Killing Rape Cuska Background The Killings The Attacks in Pavljan and Zahac The Perpetrators Ljubenic 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges of Forced Migration in Serbia Position of Refugees, Internally Displaced Persons, Returnees and Asylum Seekers
    CHALLENGES OF FORCED MIGRATION IN SERBIA POSITION OF REFUGEES, INTERNALLY DISPLACED PERSONS, RETURNEES AND ASYLUM SEEKERS June 2011 The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of Group 484 and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union 1 2 The goal of this publication is to raise the level of understanding of the complex problems of forced migration in Serbia in the territory of the former Yugoslavia in the context of the obligations in the process of European integrations, as well as to encourage cooperation and exchange of knowledge and experience among national and international institutions, civil society, the academic community and interested individuals. The policy paper on the status and problems of refugees, internally displaced persons, asylum seekers and returnees under readmission agreements, "The Challenges of Forced Migration in Serbia", coordinated by Group 484, was developed by a team composed of representatives of NGOs dealing with these issues: Humanitarian Centre for Integration and Tolerance, Praxis, Society for Peace, Development and Ecology, International Aid Network, Ecumenical Humanitarian Organization, the Red Cross of Serbia, the “Protecta” Centre for Civil Society Development , Serbian Democratic Forum, Novi Sad Humanitarian Centre, Union, Educational Centre Leskovac, Balkan Centre for Migration and Humanitarian Activities, Belgrade Centre for Human Rights, Belgrade Centre for Security Policy, and the Initiative for Development and Cooperation. NGO representatives participated in four working groups to agree on a common policy paper that should also be the basis for advocating for the rights of forced migrants in the state institutions of Serbia and the EU bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • At the Margins of the Habsburg Civilizing Mission 25
    i CEU Press Studies in the History of Medicine Volume XIII Series Editor:5 Marius Turda Published in the series: Svetla Baloutzova Demography and Nation Social Legislation and Population Policy in Bulgaria, 1918–1944 C Christian Promitzer · Sevasti Trubeta · Marius Turda, eds. Health, Hygiene and Eugenics in Southeastern Europe to 1945 C Francesco Cassata Building the New Man Eugenics, Racial Science and Genetics in Twentieth-Century Italy C Rachel E. Boaz In Search of “Aryan Blood” Serology in Interwar and National Socialist Germany C Richard Cleminson Catholicism, Race and Empire Eugenics in Portugal, 1900–1950 C Maria Zarimis Darwin’s Footprint Cultural Perspectives on Evolution in Greece (1880–1930s) C Tudor Georgescu The Eugenic Fortress The Transylvanian Saxon Experiment in Interwar Romania C Katherina Gardikas Landscapes of Disease Malaria in Modern Greece C Heike Karge · Friederike Kind-Kovács · Sara Bernasconi From the Midwife’s Bag to the Patient’s File Public Health in Eastern Europe C Gregory Sullivan Regenerating Japan Organicism, Modernism and National Destiny in Oka Asajirō’s Evolution and Human Life C Constantin Bărbulescu Physicians, Peasants, and Modern Medicine Imagining Rurality in Romania, 1860–1910 C Vassiliki Theodorou · Despina Karakatsani Strengthening Young Bodies, Building the Nation A Social History of Child Health and Welfare in Greece (1890–1940) C Making Muslim Women European Voluntary Associations, Gender and Islam in Post-Ottoman Bosnia and Yugoslavia (1878–1941) Fabio Giomi Central European University Press Budapest—New York iii © 2021 Fabio Giomi Published in 2021 by Central European University Press Nádor utca 9, H-1051 Budapest, Hungary Tel: +36-1-327-3138 or 327-3000 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.ceupress.com An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libraries working with Knowledge Unlatched (KU).
    [Show full text]
  • Isidora Bjelica BE­O­G UR­B APO­STO­LI a RA­ N O­ DA G
    Isidora Bjelica APO­STO­LI UR­BANO­G BE­O­GRA­DA APO­STO­LI Copyright © 00 by Isidora Bjelica Copyright © 007 ovog izdanja LAGUNA UR­BANO­G BE­O­GRA­DA SADR­ŽAJ U PO­TRAZI ZA IZGUBLJE­NIM VRE­ME­NO­M SRPSKA DE­CA E­NDIJA VOR­HO­LA ili UME­STO­ UVO­DA 9 O­LIVE­R MANDIĆ ili KRALJ BE­O­GRADA NO­ĆU . O­LIVE­R MANDIĆ ili KRALJ BE­O­GRADA NO­ĆU PRVI PUT PO­SLE­ 1 GO­DINA . .8 VLADIMIR JO­VANO­VIĆ – SRPSKI VOR­HO­L ili PRE­DLO­G ZA ULTIMATIVNI INTE­RNE­T FAJL . .9 SRĐAN PE­TRO­VIĆ AZV NI SRLE­ PANKE­R ili NAJLE­PŠI BE­O­GRAĐANIN PRE­D VUKO­VARO­M . SRBA TRAVANO­V ili BE­O­GRADSKI PRO­MO­TE­R DOL­ČE­ VITA FILO­SO­FIJE­ . .71 LJUBO­MIR IŠ MUNIĆ ili BE­O­GRADSKI ZLATNI VO­AJE­R NA PUTU ZA HO­LIVUD . .80 SRĐAN ŠAPE­R O­D BE­O­GRADSKO­G DAVITE­LJA I IDO­LA DO­ GAZDA SRKIJA . .87 JO­CA JO­VANO­VIĆ ili MLAD I ZDRAV KAO­ RUŽA . .98 7 8 Isi­do­ra Bje­li­ca NE­BOJ­ŠA PAJKIĆ NAJVE­ĆI BE­O­GRADSKI DRKADŽIJA ili JE­DINI FILMO­SLO­V KO­GA SMO­ IKAD IMALI . .10 SLO­BA KO­NJO­VIĆ . .110 MOM­ČILO­ RAJIN ili BE­O­GRADSKI GE­NIJE­ IZ SE­NKE­ 117 U PO­TRA­ZI ZA IZGUBLJE­NIM VR­E­ME­NO­M MARINA ABRAMO­VIĆ i NE­ŠAA P RIPO­VIĆ BE­O­GRADSKI KON­CE­PTUALNI PAR .
    [Show full text]
  • Memorial of the Republic of Croatia
    INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE CASE CONCERNING THE APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE (CROATIA v. YUGOSLAVIA) MEMORIAL OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA ANNEXES REGIONAL FILES VOLUME 2 PART I EASTERN SLAVONIA 1 MARCH 2001 II CONTENTS ETHNIC STRUCTURES 1 Eastern Slavonia 3 Tenja 4 Antin 5 Dalj 6 Berak 7 Bogdanovci 8 Šarengrad 9 Ilok 10 Tompojevci 11 Bapska 12 Tovarnik 13 Sotin 14 Lovas 15 Tordinci 16 Vukovar 17 WITNESS STATEMENTS TENJA 19 Annex 1: Witness Statement of M.K. 21 Annex 2: Witness Statement of R.J. 22 Annex 3: Witness Statement of I.K. (1) 24 Annex 4: Witness Statement of J.P. 29 Annex 5: Witness Statement of L.B. 34 Annex 6: Witness Statement of P.Š. 35 Annex 7: Witness Statement of D.M. 37 Annex 8: Witness Statement of M.R. 39 Annex 9: Witness Statement of M.M. 39 Annex 10: Witness Statement of M.K. 41 Annex 11: Witness Statement of I.I.* 42 Annex 12: Witness Statement of Z.B. 52 Annex 13: Witness Statement of A.M. 54 Annex 14: Witness Statement of J.S. 56 Annex 15: Witness Statement of Z.M. 58 Annex 16: Witness Statement of J.K. 60 IV Annex 17: Witness Statement of L.R. 63 Annex 18: Witness Statement of Đ.B. 64 WITNESS STATEMENTS DALJ 67 Annex 19: Witness Statement of J.P. 69 Annex 20: Witness Statement of I.K. (2) 71 Annex 21: Witness Statement of A.K. 77 Annex 22: Witness Statement of H.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Macro Report Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 4: Macro Report September 10, 2012
    Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 1 Module 4: Macro Report Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 4: Macro Report September 10, 2012 Country: Serbia Date of Election: May 6, 2012 (Parliamentary and first round presidential); May 20, 2012 - second round presidential Prepared by: Bojan Todosijević Date of Preparation: 05. 08. 2013. NOTES TO COLLABORATORS: ° The information provided in this report contributes to an important part of the CSES project. The information may be filled out by yourself, or by an expert or experts of your choice. Your efforts in providing these data are greatly appreciated! Any supplementary documents that you can provide (e.g., electoral legislation, party manifestos, electoral commission reports, media reports) are also appreciated, and may be made available on the CSES website. ° Answers should be as of the date of the election being studied. ° Where brackets [ ] appear, collaborators should answer by placing an “X” within the appropriate bracket or brackets. For example: [X] ° If more space is needed to answer any question, please lengthen the document as necessary. Data Pertinent to the Election at which the Module was Administered 1a. Type of Election [ ] Parliamentary/Legislative [X] Parliamentary/Legislative and Presidential [ ] Presidential [ ] Other; please specify: __________ 1b. If the type of election in Question 1a included Parliamentary/Legislative, was the election for the Upper House, Lower House, or both? [ X] Upper House [ ] Lower House [ ] Both [ ] Other; please specify: __________ Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 2 Module 4: Macro Report 2a. What was the party of the president prior to the most recent election, regardless of whether the election was presidential? Democratic Party (Demokratska stranka, DS) 2b.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Communities in the Political and Legal Systems of Post-Yugoslav Countries
    TRAMES, 2017, 21(71/66), 3, 251–271 JEWISH COMMUNITIES IN THE POLITICAL AND LEGAL SYSTEMS OF POST-YUGOSLAV COUNTRIES Boris Vukićević University of Montenegro Abstract. After the dissolution of Yugoslavia, the Jewish community within Yugoslavia was also split up, and now various Jewish communities exist in the seven post-Yugoslav countries. Although all of these communities are relatively small, their size, influence, and activity vary. The political and legal status of Jewish communities, normatively speaking, differs across the former Yugoslav republics. Sometimes Jews or Jewish communities are mentioned in constitutions, signed agreements with governments, or are recognized in laws that regulate religious communities. Despite normative differences, they share most of the same problems – a slow process of return of property, diminishing numbers due to emigra- tion and assimilation, and, although on a much lower scale than in many other countries, creeping anti-Semitism. They also share the same opportunities – a push for more minority rights as part of ‘Europeanization’ and the perception of Jewish communities as a link to influential investors and politicians from the Jewish diaspora and Israel. Keywords: Jewish communities, minority rights, post-communism, former Yugoslavia DOI: https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2017.3.04 1. Introduction In 1948, the first postwar census in Yugoslavia counted 6,538 people of Jewish nationality, although many Jews identified as other nationalities (e.g. Croat, Serb) in the census while identifying religiously as Jewish, as seen by the fact that Jewish municipalities (or communities) across Yugoslavia had 11,934 members (Boeckh 2006:427). The number of Jews in Yugoslavia decreased in the following years after the foundation of the State of Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorial of the Republic of Croatia
    INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE CASE CONCERNING THE APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE (CROATIA v. YUGOSLAVIA) MEMORIAL OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA APPENDICES VOLUME 5 1 MARCH 2001 II III Contents Page Appendix 1 Chronology of Events, 1980-2000 1 Appendix 2 Video Tape Transcript 37 Appendix 3 Hate Speech: The Stimulation of Serbian Discontent and Eventual Incitement to Commit Genocide 45 Appendix 4 Testimonies of the Actors (Books and Memoirs) 73 4.1 Veljko Kadijević: “As I see the disintegration – An Army without a State” 4.2 Stipe Mesić: “How Yugoslavia was Brought Down” 4.3 Borisav Jović: “Last Days of the SFRY (Excerpts from a Diary)” Appendix 5a Serb Paramilitary Groups Active in Croatia (1991-95) 119 5b The “21st Volunteer Commando Task Force” of the “RSK Army” 129 Appendix 6 Prison Camps 141 Appendix 7 Damage to Cultural Monuments on Croatian Territory 163 Appendix 8 Personal Continuity, 1991-2001 363 IV APPENDIX 1 CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS1 ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THE CHRONOLOGY BH Bosnia and Herzegovina CSCE Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe CK SKJ Centralni komitet Saveza komunista Jugoslavije (Central Committee of the League of Communists of Yugoslavia) EC European Community EU European Union FRY Federal Republic of Yugoslavia HDZ Hrvatska demokratska zajednica (Croatian Democratic Union) HV Hrvatska vojska (Croatian Army) IMF International Monetary Fund JNA Jugoslavenska narodna armija (Yugoslav People’s Army) NAM Non-Aligned Movement NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organisation
    [Show full text]