Republic of Serbia Anti-Corruption Agency The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Republic of Serbia Anti-Corruption Agency The REPUBLIC OF SERBIA ANTI-CORRUPTION AGENCY THE FIRST REPORT ON OVERSIGHT OF POLITICAL ENTITES 2012 ELECTION CAMPAIGN COSTS Belgrade, May 2013 Translation of this document has been provided through a USAID funded Judicial Reform and Government Accountability Project. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 5 1. DATA USED FOR THE ANALYSIS AND OVERSIGHT OF FINANCIAL REPORTS 8 1.1. Collection of data during the election monitoring campaign 8 1.1.1. Concept and structure of monitoring 8 1.1.2. Collection and exchange of data 10 1.1.3. Purpose and importance of monitoring 10 1.2. Collection of data from state authorities, banks, legal entities and natural persons 10 1.2.1. Advertising via media outlets 11 1.2.2. Advertising by election material 12 1.2.3. Public event organization 12 2. SUBJECT TO OVERSIGHT 14 3. FINANCIAL INDICATORS 18 3.1. Income 19 3.1.1. Contributions from natural persons 19 3.1.2. Contributions from legal entities 24 3.2. Expenditures 25 3.2.1. Public advertising 29 3.2.2. Election Material 31 3.2.3. Other expenses 33 3.2.4. Public events 34 4. COMPARISON OF PRESENTED INCOME AND EXPENDITURES 36 4.1. Comparative Review of Income and Expenditures 36 5. ELECTORAL BOND 37 6. RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE COURSE OF OVERSIGHT 38 7. FACTS INDICATING VIOLATIONS OF THE LAW ON FINANCING OF POLITICAL ACTIVITIES AND PHENOMENA OBSERVED DURING INCOME AND EXPENDITURES OVERSIGHT 40 7.1. Facts indicating violations of the Law observed in income and expenditures oversight 40 7.1.1. Failure to submit the report on election campaign costs 40 7.1.2. Formal irregularities 40 7.1.3. Failure to present the election campaign income and costs 41 7.1.4. Unspent funds from the election campaign 46 7.1.5. Settling the expenses of an election campaign using an account opened for raising funds and paying the expenses of another election campaign 46 7.1.6. Settling election campaign expenses using an account that was not opened for election campaign financing 47 7.1.7. Contributions from legal persons that failed to satisfy their dues on the basis of public income 48 7.1.8. Failure to submit data on the request of the Agency 49 7.2. Phenomena indicating violations of the Law during income and expenditure oversight 50 7.2.1. Uncovered Liabilities 50 7.2.2. Indebtedness 50 7.2.3. Donors and Donor Income 50 7.2.4. Election Campaign Donors Registered After Call for Elections 52 7.2.5. Local Government Entities As Donors Of Contributions 52 8. NEXT STEPS 53 ANNEX 1 OVERVIEW OF LISTS OF CANDIDATES BY LOCALES FOR WHICH THE REPORTS WERE NOT SUBMITTED BY 24 APRIL 2013 ANNEX 2 OVERVIEW OF THE HIGHEST AND LOWEST DONATIONS MADE BY NATURAL PERSONS AND LEGAL ENTITIES LISTED BY ELECTORAL LEVELS ANNEX 3 OVERVIEW OF NON-FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTIONS MADE BY NATURAL AND LEGAL PERSONS, LISTED BY ELECTORAL LEVEL, WITH AN INDICATION OF NON- FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTION TYPE ANNEX 4 REVIEW OF POLITICAL ENTITIES DUES NOT SATISFIED BY THE DAY OF FILING OF THE AGENCY’S REPORT ANNEX 5 LIST OF LEGAL ENTITIES WITH DEBTS NOT SETTLED ON THE DAY OF REPORT SUBMISSION 4 INTRODUCTION On May 6, 2012, in the Republic of Serbia, elections were held for the President of the Republic, Members of Parliament (MPs) of the National Assembly of the Republic of Serbia, deputies of the Autonomous Province of Vojvodina (APV) Assembly, and councilors of assemblies of the local self- government units1. All participants in the election campaign in the period from the day of calling the elections till the day of proclamation of the final results were generically named „political entities‟, which we may, in terms of the Law on Financing of Political Activates2, differentiate into political parties, coalitions, and groups of citizens. Every political entity that participated in the election campaign, whether it nominated a candidate or filed an electoral list, had the following obligations in terms of the Law: Obligation to open a special-purpose account for funds raised to finance every election campaign, and to pay all election campaign expenses from that account (Article 24); Obligation to appoint a person responsible for lawful financing of political campaigns and submission of a report, as well as to inform the Agency about the appointment of said person within three days of his/her appointment (Article 31); Obligation to submit to the Agency a report on election campaign costs containing data on the origin, amount, and structure of raised and spent funds from both public and private sources; to submit the report in a form, whose content is established by the Rulebook on Contribution and Asset Records, Annual Financial Report, and the Report on Election Campaign Expenses of a Political Entity3 (“Official Gazette of the RS”, nos. 72/11 and 25/12), in a way stipulated by the Law and Rulebook and in compliance with the time limit of 30 days from the day of publication of final election results for electronic submission plus a written report 8 days after the electronic submission; 1 In the city of Belgrade Assembly and assemblies of other 22 towns of the republic of Serbia (Valjevo, Vranje, Zajeĉar, Zrenjanin, Jagodina, Kragujevac, Kraljevo, Kruševac, Leskovac, Loznica, Niš, Novi Paraz, Novi Sad, Panĉevo, Poţarevac, Smederevo, Sombor, Sremska Mitrovica, Subotica, Uţice, Ĉaĉak and Šabac), Municipal Assemblies (except for AranĊelovac, Bor, Kosjerić, Kovin, Negotin, Odţak and Vrbas) and City Municipla Assemblies (except for Voţdovac and Zemun). 2 “Official Gayette of the Republic of Serbia”, No. 43/11. 3 “Official Gayette of the Republic of Serbia”, Nos. 72/11 and 25/12. 5 Obligation to, upon the Agency‟s request, submit all data, during the campaign and afterwards, needed by the Agency so as to conduct all tasks related to oversight of election campaign financing (Article 32). The Anti-Corruption Agency, whose competence comprises (Article 5 of the Law on the ACA) the tasks stipulated by the Law on Financing of Political Activities, which regulates source and mode of financing of political activities of political parties, coalitions and group of citizen, has the following rights (Articles 27-29 and 32-34): Right to have direct and free access to bookkeeping records and documentation and financial reports of both political entity and endowment and foundation founded by political party; Right to send a request to a political entity to submit all requested documents and information within a time limit not exceeding 15 days (during the election campaign, not exceeding 3 days); Right to send a request to any authority of the Republic of Serbia, Autonomous Province, and local self-government units, banks, as well as to natural persons and legal entities financing political entities, or which on their behalf and for their account provided certain service, asking them to send information, in which process all prohibitions and restrictions regarding submission of information stipulated by other regulations are not implemented; Possibility to engage relevant experts and institutions; Possibility to, after financial report oversight, send a request to the State Audit Institution to audit the reports in accordance with the law regulating competencies of the SAI; Right to organize independent monitoring of election campaigns within the election campaign expenses oversight tasks, for which funds from the budget of the Republic of Serbia are allocated to the Agency; Right to adopt by-laws regulating the content and manner of keeping of records on assets and contributions, as well as those regulating the content of the annual financial statement and report on election campaign expenses. Furthermore, the Agency was granted certain authorities in case of violation of the Law (Articles 35- 40 and Articles 42-43): To impose a warning measure on a political entity if in the oversight procedure it establishes some irregularities that might be corrected; To file a motion to institute a criminal or misdemeanor proceedings; 6 To, after the start of a criminal or misdemeanor proceedings, send a request to the ministry competent for financial affairs, or the relevant province authority, or local self-government authority, to issue a decision on temporary suspension of transfer of funds from public sources to a political entity until a final decision in the criminal or misdemeanor proceedings is rendered; To, in case of conviction for a criminal offense or if a political party or a responsible person in a political entity is convicted for a misdemeanor, issue a decision on the loss of rights to public funds for financing of regular work of a political entity for the next calendar year. The decision also established the amount of funds to be suspended. 7 1. DATA USED FOR THE ANALYSIS AND OVERSIGHT OF FINANCIAL REPORTS 1.1. Collection of data during the election monitoring campaign 1.1.1. Concept and structure of monitoring The new Law on Financing of Political Activities, which entered into force in June 2011, introduced an important novelty when it comes to an oversight of the money flows through the transactions of political entities. This complex and responsible task was entrusted to the Anti-Corruption Agency. The first step undertaken by the Agency to ensure financial transparency in the campaign was through the organization of a monitoring process in 2012 so as to monitor the activities of political entities during their campaign for the president of the Republic, MPs, deputies, and councilors. This process is very important in the period of election cycles, when the dynamic of financial transactions of political entities is at the highest level. In November 2011, the Agency initiated all preparations for the monitoring processes. In the same month, the Agency adopted a Rulebook on Election Campaign Monitors, regulating organization, competences, rights, obligations, terms, and manner of selection of monitors for the election campaign cost oversight procedure.
Recommended publications
  • Republic of Serbia Ipard Programme for 2014-2020
    EN ANNEX Ministry of Agriculture and Environmental Protection Republic of Serbia REPUBLIC OF SERBIA IPARD PROGRAMME FOR 2014-2020 27th June 2019 1 List of Abbreviations AI - Artificial Insemination APSFR - Areas with Potential Significant Flood Risk APV - The Autonomous Province of Vojvodina ASRoS - Agricultural Strategy of the Republic of Serbia AWU - Annual work unit CAO - Competent Accrediting Officer CAP - Common Agricultural Policy CARDS - Community Assistance for Reconstruction, Development and Stabilisation CAS - Country Assistance Strategy CBC - Cross border cooperation CEFTA - Central European Free Trade Agreement CGAP - Code of Good Agricultural Practices CHP - Combined Heat and Power CSF - Classical swine fever CSP - Country Strategy Paper DAP - Directorate for Agrarian Payment DNRL - Directorate for National Reference Laboratories DREPR - Danube River Enterprise Pollution Reduction DTD - Dunav-Tisa-Dunav Channel EAR - European Agency for Reconstruction EC - European Commission EEC - European Economic Community EU - European Union EUROP grid - Method of carcass classification F&V - Fruits and Vegetables FADN - Farm Accountancy Data Network FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization FAVS - Area of forest available for wood supply FOWL - Forest and other wooded land FVO - Food Veterinary Office FWA - Framework Agreement FWC - Framework Contract GAEC - Good agriculture and environmental condition GAP - Gross Agricultural Production GDP - Gross Domestic Product GEF - Global Environment Facility GEF - Global Environment Facility GES
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom in the World - Serbia (2010)
    Page 1 of 5 Print Freedom in the World - Serbia (2010) Political Rights Score: 2 * Capital: Belgrade Civil Liberties Score: 2 * Status: Free Population: 7,322,000 Explanatory Note The ratings through 2002 are for the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, of which Serbia was a part, and those from 2003 through 2005 are for the State Union of Serbia and Montenegro. Kosovo is examined in a separate report. Ratings Change Serbia’s political rights rating improved from 3 to 2 due to the consolidation of a stable multiparty system after several rounds of elections in the post-Milosevic period. Overview The parliament in November approved a new statute regulating the autonomy of the northern province of Vojvodina, ending a long political debate over the issue and demonstrating the effectiveness of the Democratic Party–led government elected in 2008. The country also made progress in its relations with the European Union, securing visa-free travel rights and the implementation of a trade agreement in December. However, press freedom groups criticized a media law adopted in August, and tensions involving the ethnic Albanian population in the Presevo Valley remained a problem. Serbia was recognized as an independent state in 1878 after several centuries under Ottoman rule. It formed the core of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes proclaimed in 1918. After World War II, Serbia became a constituent republic of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, under the communist rule of Josip Broz Tito. Within the boundaries of the Serbian republic as drawn at that time were two autonomous provinces: the largely Albanian-populated Kosovo in the south, and Vojvodina, with a significant Hungarian minority, in the north.
    [Show full text]
  • Jedinica Lokalne Samouprave Grad/Mesto Naziv Marketa Adresa Ada Ada TSV Diskont Lenjinova 24 Ada Ada DUDI CO D.O.O
    Jedinica lokalne samouprave Grad/Mesto Naziv marketa Adresa Ada Ada TSV Diskont Lenjinova 24 Ada Ada DUDI CO D.O.O. Lenjinova 15 Ada Ada Gomex Lenjinova 2 Ada Ada Big Chick Ivo Lola Ribara 3. Ada Ada Univerexport Sabo Sepeši Lasla 88 Ada Ada Univerexport Lenjinova 44a Ada Ada DTL - AD Senta Promet TP Bakoš Kalmana 1 Ada Ada DTL - AD Senta Promet TP Žarka Zrenjanina 12 Ada Ada DTL - AD Senta Promet TP Karadjordjeva br 61 Ada Ada DTL - AD Senta Promet TP Ul. Save Kovačevića 1 Ada Mol TSV Diskont Maršala Tita 75 Ada Mol Gomex Maršala Tita 50 Ada Mol Big Chick M. Tita 55. Ada Mol DTL - AD Senta Promet TP Ul Đure Daničića 24 Aleksandrovac Aleksandrovac I.M. Biftek Niš 29. Novembra br.86 Aleksandrovac Aleksandrovac TSV DISKONT 29. Novembra 48 Aleksandrovac Aleksandrovac TR Lukić ITS Gornje Rateje BB Aleksandrovac Aleksandrovac STR Popović 29. Novembra 105/2 Aleksandrovac Aleksandrovac STR Popović Kruševačka BB Aleksandrovac Aleksandrovac Str Mira Dobroljupci BB Aleksandrovac Aleksandrovac Mesara Glidžić 29 Novembra bb Aleksandrovac Aleksandrovac DIS 10. Avgusta bb, 37230 Aleksandrovac Aleksandrovac Garevina STUR TOŠA GAREVINA Garevina Aleksinac Aleksinac PD SUPERMARKETI AS DOO KNJAZA MILOSA 40 Aleksinac Aleksinac PD SUPERMARKETI AS DOO KNJAZA MILOSA 138-144 Aleksinac Aleksinac PD SUPERMARKETI AS DOO MOMČILA POPOVIĆA 128 Aleksinac Aleksinac SL Market Knjaza Milosa 77 Aleksinac Aleksinac Kneza Miloša 80 Aleksinac Aleksinac Apoteka Arnika Momčila Popovića 23 Aleksinac Aleksinac PD SUPERMARKETI AS DOO Maksima Gorkog 31 Aleksinac Aleksinac IDEA Kneza Miloša 80 Aleksinac Aleksinac I.M. Matijević DUSANA TRIVUNCA 42 Aleksinac Aleksinac I.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Macro Report Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 4: Macro Report September 10, 2012
    Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 1 Module 4: Macro Report Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 4: Macro Report September 10, 2012 Country: Serbia Date of Election: May 6, 2012 (Parliamentary and first round presidential); May 20, 2012 - second round presidential Prepared by: Bojan Todosijević Date of Preparation: 05. 08. 2013. NOTES TO COLLABORATORS: ° The information provided in this report contributes to an important part of the CSES project. The information may be filled out by yourself, or by an expert or experts of your choice. Your efforts in providing these data are greatly appreciated! Any supplementary documents that you can provide (e.g., electoral legislation, party manifestos, electoral commission reports, media reports) are also appreciated, and may be made available on the CSES website. ° Answers should be as of the date of the election being studied. ° Where brackets [ ] appear, collaborators should answer by placing an “X” within the appropriate bracket or brackets. For example: [X] ° If more space is needed to answer any question, please lengthen the document as necessary. Data Pertinent to the Election at which the Module was Administered 1a. Type of Election [ ] Parliamentary/Legislative [X] Parliamentary/Legislative and Presidential [ ] Presidential [ ] Other; please specify: __________ 1b. If the type of election in Question 1a included Parliamentary/Legislative, was the election for the Upper House, Lower House, or both? [ X] Upper House [ ] Lower House [ ] Both [ ] Other; please specify: __________ Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 2 Module 4: Macro Report 2a. What was the party of the president prior to the most recent election, regardless of whether the election was presidential? Democratic Party (Demokratska stranka, DS) 2b.
    [Show full text]
  • Подкласс Exogenia Collin, 1912
    Research Article ISSN 2336-9744 (online) | ISSN 2337-0173 (print) The journal is available on line at www.ecol-mne.com Contribution to the knowledge of distribution of Colubrid snakes in Serbia LJILJANA TOMOVIĆ1,2,4*, ALEKSANDAR UROŠEVIĆ2,4, RASTKO AJTIĆ3,4, IMRE KRIZMANIĆ1, ALEKSANDAR SIMOVIĆ4, NENAD LABUS5, DANKO JOVIĆ6, MILIVOJ KRSTIĆ4, SONJA ĐORĐEVIĆ1,4, MARKO ANĐELKOVIĆ2,4, ANA GOLUBOVIĆ1,4 & GEORG DŽUKIĆ2 1 University of Belgrade, Faculty of Biology, Studentski trg 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 2 University of Belgrade, Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stanković”, Bulevar despota Stefana 142, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 3 Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia, Dr Ivana Ribara 91, 11070 Belgrade, Serbia 4 Serbian Herpetological Society “Milutin Radovanović”, Bulevar despota Stefana 142, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 5 University of Priština, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Biology Department, Lole Ribara 29, 38220 Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia 6 Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia, Vožda Karađorđa 14, 18000 Niš, Serbia *Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected] Received 28 March 2015 │ Accepted 31 March 2015 │ Published online 6 April 2015. Abstract Detailed distribution pattern of colubrid snakes in Serbia is still inadequately described, despite the long historical study. In this paper, we provide accurate distribution of seven species, with previously published and newly accumulated faunistic records compiled. Comparative analysis of faunas among all Balkan countries showed that Serbian colubrid fauna is among the most distinct (together with faunas of Slovenia and Romania), due to small number of species. Zoogeographic analysis showed high chorotype diversity of Serbian colubrids: seven species belong to six chorotypes. South-eastern Serbia (Pčinja River valley) is characterized by the presence of all colubrid species inhabiting our country, and deserves the highest conservation status at the national level.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberal Parties in Europe and Human Rights Emphasis
    LIBERAL PARTIES IN EUROPE AND HUMAN RIGHTS EMPHASIS by ŞEYMA KOÇ Submitted to the Graduate School of Social Sciences in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Sabancı University August 2020 LIBERAL PARTIES IN EUROPE AND HUMAN RIGHTS EMPHASIS Approved by: Assoc. Prof Özge Kemahlıoğlu . (Thesis Supervisor) Prof. Ali Çarkoğlu . Asst. Prof. Mert Moral . Date of Approval: August 5, 2020 ŞEYMA KOÇ 2020 c All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT LIBERAL PARTIES IN EUROPE AND HUMAN RIGHTS EMPHASIS ŞEYMA KOÇ POLITICAL SCIENCE M.A. THESIS, AUGUST 2020 Thesis Supervisor: Assoc.Prof. Özge Kemahlıoğlu Keywords: Political Parties, Liberal Party Family, Human Rights Emphasis, Economic Conditions Liberal parties are mostly neglected by the literature on political parties despite their central role in establishing European liberal democracies. This thesis aims to contribute to the contemporary literature on liberal parties by examining 33 Eu- ropean democracies and covering a time period including observations of 75 years. The empirical analysis shows that liberal parties are distinguishable from the other party families on their emphasis on human rights and freedom. Then, this thesis investigates the impact of economic conditions on liberal parties’ relative emphasis on human rights and freedom. The findings illustrate that higher levels of unemploy- ment rate decrease liberal parties’ relative emphasis on human rights and freedom and increase their relative emphasis on economic issues. Its effect on the relative em- phasis on human rights and freedom issue and economic issues is substantive when the distributions of the dependent variables are considered. This finding may demon- strate the liberal parties’ responsiveness to changing needs of the electorate and a value change in politics too.
    [Show full text]
  • Serbia in 2001 Under the Spotlight
    1 Human Rights in Transition – Serbia 2001 Introduction The situation of human rights in Serbia was largely influenced by the foregoing circumstances. Although the severe repression characteristic especially of the last two years of Milosevic’s rule was gone, there were no conditions in place for dealing with the problems accumulated during the previous decade. All the mechanisms necessary to ensure the exercise of human rights - from the judiciary to the police, remained unchanged. However, the major concern of citizens is the mere existential survival and personal security. Furthermore, the general atmosphere in the society was just as xenophobic and intolerant as before. The identity crisis of the Serb people and of all minorities living in Serbia continued. If anything, it deepened and the relationship between the state and its citizens became seriously jeopardized by the problem of Serbia’s undefined borders. The crisis was manifest with regard to certain minorities such as Vlachs who were believed to have been successfully assimilated. This false belief was partly due to the fact that neighbouring Romania had been in a far worse situation than Yugoslavia during the past fifty years. In considerably changed situation in Romania and Serbia Vlachs are now undergoing the process of self identification though still unclear whether they would choose to call themselves Vlachs or Romanians-Vlachs. Considering that the international factor has become the main generator of change in Serbia, the Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia believes that an accurate picture of the situation in Serbia is absolutely necessary. It is essential to establish the differences between Belgrade and the rest of Serbia, taking into account its internal diversities.
    [Show full text]
  • SE Weekly Mar 14 20.Pdf
    Weekly Review // March 14 - 20 SOUTHEASTERN EUROPE Observatory The Southeastern Europe Intelligence Unit is formed by an ambitious group of young scientists which focuses on the political, economic, defense and security developments in the wider region of Southeastern Europe. Our main task is the “Southeastern Europe Observatory” to become a credible, detailed, objective and flexible “tool” of information and short analysis in the hands of the researcher and the professional who is interested in the current affairs of this sensitive and crucial part of the European continent. In each weekly review, you will find the most significant news of the previous week in the region. SPECIAL COUNTRY REPORT: Turkey Kurds clash with police at Newroz - a cultural or a political suppression? very year March 21, millions of Kurds across the world celebrate Newroz, which refers to the beginning of the New Year for the Kurdish people. Meaning ‘the new day’ in Kurdish language, Newroz represents the beginning of Spring and the starts of the New EYear. Members of the pro-Kurdish party BDP (Peace and Democracy Party) applied for permission to spread their fests to the days of 17-21 March as they have been doing in previous years. However, this year, the Ministry of the Interior denied permission for the earlier start of Newroz celebrations before the 21st, strictly prohibiting any activity on March 18. The ban arrived soon after the president of the BDP, Selahattin Demirtas declared the official celebrations shall take place on Sunday the 18th, instead of Monday 21st. Despite the bans, Newroz celebrations took place in Van, Hakkari, Siirt, Mus, Diyarbakır, Instabul and Ankara.
    [Show full text]
  • Southeastern Europe
    U.S. ONLINE TRAINING FOR OSCE, INCLUDING REACT Module 5. Southeastern Europe This module introduces you to southeastern Europe and the OSCE’s work in: • Croatia (The OSCE Office in Zagreb was closed in 2012) • Macedonia • Bosnia-Herzegovina • Serbia • Kosovo • Montenegro • Albania . 1 Table of Contents Overview. 3 Geography. 4 People. 6 Former Yugoslavia. 10 World War I. 11 World War II. 12 Federal People’s Republic of Yugoslavia. 14 Post-Tito. 15 Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. 17 Croatia. 18 Key information. 19 Historical background. 20 During Tito. 21 After Tito. 22 War of independence. 23 Domestic politics. 25 Macedonia. 35 Key information. 36 Historical background. 38 19th and early 20th centuries. 39 During Tito. 41 Independence. 43 Domestic politics. 44 Prospects and challenges. 67 Bosnia-Herzegovina (BiH). 72 Key information. 73 Historical background. 75 During the Tito era. 76 The Bosnian war: 1992-1995. 79 Disunity of international community. 81 The Dayton Peace Accords, 1995. 84 Politics since Dayton. 87 Challenges and pressures. 95 Serbia. 99 Key information. 100 Introduction. 101 Contemporary Serbia. 102 Miloševi?'s rise. 104 Domestic resistance and state oppression. 106 Consequences of Kosovo. 109 The short-lived Kosovo Verification Mission. 110 MODULE 5. Southeastern Europe 2 Regime repression intensifies. 112 Struggle for Serbia’s political direction. 115 Nikolic wins 2012 presidential election. 122 Serbia's identity and its vision for the future. 124 Montenegro. 131 Key information. 132 Contemporary Montenegro. 133 Politics in Montenegro. 134 Other issues. 140 Kosovo. 142 Key information. 143 Historical background of Kosovo. 144 Organized non-violence. 145 After Dayton. 147 UNMIK established.
    [Show full text]
  • Insufficiently Utilized Natural Tourist Resouces of Southern Serbia
    (JPMNT) Journal of Process Management – New Technologies, International Vol. 1, No.3, 2013. INSUFFICIENTLY UTILIZED NATURAL TOURIST RESOUCES OF SOUTHERN SERBIA PhD Svetlana Trajković, Collage of applied professional studies, Vranje, Serbia PhD Predrag Trajković, Mapro, Vranje, Serbia MSc Milan Ivanković, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management, Department for rural development, Belgrade, Serbia Abstract. South Serbia is highly purpose of shopping and business activities, attractive for tourists due to its homogenous could be perceived as tourism. relief structures, rich historical heritage and pleasant natural wealth of flora and fauna, Tourism can be differentiated into: natural mineral and thermal springs and rivers, • rural tourism, and bodies of water. It has a unique and outstanding historical and cultural heritage, • residential tourism, monuments, monasteries, authentic folklore, music and traditions, and traditionaly hospitable • heritage tourism, Serbian hosts. It has many hot springs, health resorts, natural phenomena, the potential for • sport/recreation and hunting tourism, sports fields, numerable events, which all gives • adventure tourism, the possibility for further development of this economic niche. • medical tourism, Keywords: tourism, natural resources, • conferences and educational tourism, mountains, hot springs, spas, historic treasures and heritage, folklore. • transit tourism, • camping tourism. INTRODUCTION Such a view of this economic segment indicates the tremendous opportunities for Tourism is an important segment of business development, especially in areas that income generation, as part of the national are rich in tourism potential of certain tourist economy, especially in recent times when it is interest. This indicates the commitment of gaining momentum due to developing of new entrepreneurs and managers to discover a demands of the society, caused by rising of the specific tourism potential, and enable access for overall living standard.
    [Show full text]
  • Jedinica Lokalne Samouprave Grad/Mesto Naziv Marketa Adresa Ada Ada TSV DISKONT Lenjinova 44A Ada Ada TSV Diskont Lenjinova 24 A
    Jedinica lokalne samouprave Grad/Mesto Naziv marketa Adresa Ada Ada TSV DISKONT Lenjinova 44a Ada Ada TSV Diskont Lenjinova 24 Ada Ada Univerexport SABO SEPEŠI LASLA 88 Ada Ada Trgopromet LENJINOVA 44A Ada Ada DUDI CO D.O.O. Lenjinova 15 Ada Ada DTL - AD Senta Promet TP Bakoš Kalmana 1 Ada Ada DTL - AD Senta Promet TP Žarka Zrenjanina 12 Ada Ada DTL - AD Senta Promet TP Karadjordjeva br 61 Ada Ada DTL - AD Senta Promet TP Ul. Save Kovačevića 1 Ada Ada Gomex Lenjinova 2 Ada Mol TSV Diskont Maršala Tita 75 Ada Mol DTL - AD Senta Promet TP Ul Đure Daničića 24 Ada Mol Gomex Maršala Tita 50 Aleksandrovac Aleksandrovac TSV DISKONT 29. Novembra 48 Aleksandrovac Aleksandrovac TR Lukić ITS Gornje Rateje BB Aleksandrovac Aleksandrovac STR Popović 29. Novembar 105/2 Aleksandrovac Aleksandrovac STR Popović Kruševačka BB Aleksandrovac Aleksandrovac Str Mira Dobroljupci BB Aleksandrovac Aleksandrovac Mesara Glidžić 29 Novembra bb Aleksandrovac Aleksandrovac IM Biftek Niš 29.novembar br.86 Aleksandrovac Aleksandrovac DIS 10. Avgusta bb, 37230 Aleksandrovac Aleksandrovac Garevina STUR TOŠA GAREVINA Garevina Aleksinac Aleksinac PD SUPERMARKETI AS DOO KNJAZA MILOSA 40 Aleksinac Aleksinac PD SUPERMARKETI AS DOO KNJAZA MILOSA 138-144 Aleksinac Aleksinac PD SUPERMARKETI AS DOO MOMČILA POPOVIĆA 128 Aleksinac Aleksinac SL Market Knjaza Milosa 77 Aleksinac Aleksinac IM Biftek Niš Majora Tepića br.11 Aleksinac Aleksinac IM Biftek Niš Momčila Popovića br. 19 Aleksinac Aleksinac Kneza Miloša 80 Aleksinac Aleksinac Apoteka Arnika Momčila Popovića 23 Aleksinac Aleksinac
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 SERBIA PUBLIC OPINION STUDY Respondent Booklet A
    2012 SERBIA PUBLIC OPINION STUDY Respondent Booklet A Page 1 • Boris Tadić Choice for a Better Life • Tomislav Nikolić Serbian Progressive Party (SNS) • Ivica Dačić SPS, PUPS, JS • Vojislav Koštunica Democratic Party of Serbia (DSS) • Zoran Stanković United Regions of Serbia (URS) • Čedomir Jovanović LDP, SPO, SDU... • Jadranka Šešelj Serbian Radical Party (SRS) • Vladan Glišić "Dveri" • Istvan Pasztor SVM • Zoran Dragišić Pokret radnika i seljaka • Muamer Zukorlić Citizen's group • Danica Grujičić Social Democratic Alliance Page 2 • Choice for a Better Life - Boris Tadić • Let’s Get Serbia Moving - Tomislav Nikolić • Ivica Dačić - Socialist Party of Serbia - PUPS-US • Democratic Party of Serbia (DSS) - Vojislav Koštunica • Turnover - Čedomir Jovanović • United Regions of Serbia - Mlađan Dinkić • Serbian Radical Party - Vojislav Šešelj • Dveri for the Life of Serbia • Alliance of Vojvodina Hungarians - István Pásztor • Movement of Workers and Peasants • Communist party - Josip Broz • Party of Democratic Action of Sanjak - Sulejman Ugljani • All Together - BDU, CAH, DUC, DFVH, Slovak - Emir Elfić • "None of the offered answers" • Social Democratic alliance - Nebojša Leković • Albanians Coalition from Preševo Valley (KAPD) • Reformist party - Milan Višnjić • Montenegrin party - Nenad Stevović Page 3 • For a European Serbia - Boris Tadić • Serbian Radical Party - Vojislav Šešelj • Democratic Party of Serbia - New Serbia - Vojislav Koštunica • Socialist Party of Serbia (SPS) - PUPS - US • Liberal Democratic Party - Čedomir Jovanović • Hungarian
    [Show full text]