Study on Reporting Obligation Resulting from Directive 2010/65/Eu (Request for Services Move/D1/2012-376)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Study on Reporting Obligation Resulting from Directive 2010/65/Eu (Request for Services Move/D1/2012-376) EUROPEAN COMMISSION DG MOVE STUDY ON REPORTING OBLIGATION RESULTING FROM DIRECTIVE 2010/65/EU (REQUEST FOR SERVICES MOVE/D1/2012-376) CALL FOR TENDER UNDER TREN/R1/350-2008 LOT 3 Final Study Report INTERMEDIATE REPORT 1 December 12, 2013 1. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Table of contents ___________________________________________________ 3 2. Glossary __________________________________________________________ 5 3. Executive summary ________________________________________________ 11 4. Introduction ______________________________________________________ 17 4.1 Context of the mission _____________________________________________________ 17 4.2 Objectives of the assignment _______________________________________________ 20 5. Methodology and work plan __________________________________________ 21 6. Scope of the Reporting Formalities Directive _____________________________ 23 6.1 Territorial scope of the RFD ________________________________________________ 23 6.2 Material scope of the RFD __________________________________________________ 23 7. The possibility of extending the simplification introduced by the Reporting formalities Directive (Art. 15(a) RFD) ___________________________________ 25 7.1 Context _________________________________________________________________ 25 7.2 Issue clarification _________________________________________________________ 30 7.3 Research questions _______________________________________________________ 30 7.4 Analysis ________________________________________________________________ 31 7.5 Conclusions _____________________________________________________________ 39 7.6 Recommendations ________________________________________________________ 40 8. The compatibility of the River Information Services with the electronic data transmission process referred to in the Reporting Formalities Directive (Art. 15(b) RFD) _______________________________________________________ 43 8.1 Context _________________________________________________________________ 43 8.2 Issue clarification _________________________________________________________ 43 8.3 Research questions _______________________________________________________ 44 8.4 Analysis ________________________________________________________________ 44 8.5 Conclusions _____________________________________________________________ 56 8.6 Recommendations ________________________________________________________ 58 9. The progress towards harmonisation and coordination of reporting formalities that has been achieved under Article 3 of the Reporting Formalities Directive (Art. 15(c) RFD) ___________________________________________________ 61 9.1 Context _________________________________________________________________ 61 9.2 Issue clarification _________________________________________________________ 63 9.3 Research questions _______________________________________________________ 66 9.4 Analysis ________________________________________________________________ 67 9.5 Conclusions ____________________________________________________________ 131 9.6 Recommendations _______________________________________________________ 132 TRACTEBEL ENGINEERING 15/11/2013 3 10. The feasability of avoiding or simplifying formalities for ships that have called at a port in a third country or free zone (Art. 15(d) RFD) _____________________ 133 10.1 Context ________________________________________________________________ 133 10.2 Issue clarification ________________________________________________________ 134 10.3 Research questions ______________________________________________________ 136 10.4 Analysis _______________________________________________________________ 137 10.5 Conclusions ____________________________________________________________ 153 10.6 Recommendations _______________________________________________________ 155 11. The available data concerning ship traffic/movement within the Union, and/or calling at third country ports or in free zones (Art. 15(e) RFD) ______________ 157 11.1 Context ________________________________________________________________ 157 11.2 Issue clarification ________________________________________________________ 157 11.3 Research questions ______________________________________________________ 157 11.4 Analysis _______________________________________________________________ 158 11.5 Conclusion _____________________________________________________________ 180 11.6 Recommendations _______________________________________________________ 182 12. General conclusions _______________________________________________ 185 13. General Recommendations __________________________________________ 189 14. ANNEXES _______________________________________________________ 193 14.1 Annex 1: Questionnaire - Stakeholder consultation _____________________________ 193 14.2 Annex 2: List of consulted persons and documents – Art. 15(a) and (b) RFD ________ 195 14.3 Annex 3: List of consulted persons and documents – Art. 15(c) RFD _______________ 198 14.4 Annex 4: List of consulted persons and documents – Art. 15(d) RFD ______________ 200 14.5 Annex 5: List of consulted persons and documents – Art. 15(e) RFD _______________ 206 14.6 Annexes re Art. 15(e) RFD ________________________________________________ 207 Annex 1. Survey EPSCA Members _____________________________________________ 207 Annex 2. Content cargo reporting forms _______________________________________ 210 Annex 3. Figures __________________________________________________________ 212 4 2. GLOSSARY ACRONYM Full name Definition AIS is an automatic tracking system used on ships and by vessel traffic services (VTS) for identifying and locating vessels by electronically exchanging data with other nearby ships AIS Base stations and Satellites. Automatic Identification When satellites are used to detect AIS signatures then the term Satellite-AIS (S-AIS) is used. AIS System AIS information supplements marine radar, which continues to be the primary method of collision avoidance for water transport. Information provided by AIS equipment, such as unique identification, position, course, and speed, can be displayed on a screen or an Electronic Chart Display Information System (ECDIS). ASP (Microsoft®) is a server-side scripting environment that can be used to create and run dynamic, interactive Web server applications. ASP Active Server Pages With ASP, HTML pages, script commands, and COM, components can be combined to create interactive Web pages and powerful Web-based applications that are easy to develop and modify. The Blue Belt is an area where vessels can operate freely within the EU internal market with a minimum of administrative burden while safety, security, environmental protection as well as customs and tax policies are Blue Belt enhanced by the use of maritime transport monitoring and reporting capabilities (processes, procedures and information systems). EDI Electronic Data Information EDI is a method for transferring data between different computer systems or computer networks. The European MSs are the members of the European Union and are party to treaties of the European Union (EU) and thereby subject to the privileges and obligations of EU membership. There are 28 member states of the EU: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Croatia, Czech Republic, (E)MSs (European) Member States Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom. TRACTEBEL ENGINEERING 15/11/2013 5 EMSA is one of the EU's decentralised agencies, which provides technical assistance and support to the EC European Maritime Safety and MSs in the development and implementation of EU legislation on maritime safety, pollution by ships and EMSA Agency maritime security. It has also been given operational tasks in the field of oil pollution response, vessel monitoring and in long range identification and tracking of vessels. Electronic Reporting The ERINOT message is an obligatory message with a purpose to notify national authorities and, when ERINOT International Notification necessary, port authorities about the voyage and cargo (dangerous and non-dangerous) details for the message message vessel which in navigating the inland waterways. Free zones are special areas within the customs territory of the Community. Goods placed within these areas are free of import duties, VAT and other import charges. Free zone treatment applies to both non-Community and Community goods: Non-Community goods stored in the zone are considered as not yet imported to the customs territory of the Community whereas certain Community goods stored in free zones can be considered as already exported. On importation, free zones are mainly for storage of non-Community goods until they are released for free Free Zone circulation. No import declaration has to be lodged as long as the goods are stored in the free zone. Import and export declarations have only to be lodged when the goods leave the free zone. In addition, there may be special reliefs available in free zones from other taxes, excises or local duties. These will differ from one zone to another. The free zones are mainly a service for traders to facilitate trading procedures by allowing fewer customs formalities. An FTP is a common method of transferring and exchanging files between two computers via the Internet FTP File Transfer Protocol (over any network). It is a simple network protocol based on Internet Protocol. HTML is the language that Web
Recommended publications
  • Ims List Sanitation Compliance and Enforcement Ratings of Interstate Milk Shippers April 2017
    IMS LIST SANITATION COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT RATINGS OF INTERSTATE MILK SHIPPERS APRIL 2017 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service Food and Drug Administration Rules For Inclusion In The IMS List Interstate milk shippers who have been certified by State Milk sanitation authorities as having attained the milk sanitation compliance ratings are indicated in the following list. These ratings are based on compliance with the requirements of the USPHS/FDA Grade A Pasteurized Milk Ordinance and Grade A Condensed and Dry Milk Products and Condensed and Dry Whey and were made in accordance with the procedures set forth in Methods of Making Sanitation Rating of Milk Supplies. *Proposal 301 that was passed at 2001 NCIMS conference held May 5-10, 2001, in Wichita, Kansas and concurred with by FDA states: "Transfer Stations, Receiving Stations and Dairy Plants must achieve a sanitation compliance rating of 90 or better in order to be eligible for a listing in the IMS List. Sanitation compliance rating scores for Transfer and Receiving Stations and Dairy Plants will not be printed in the IMS List". Therefore, the publication of a sanitation compliance rating score for Transfer and Receiving Stations and Dairy Plants will not be printed in this edition of the IMS List. THIS LIST SUPERSEDES ALL LISTS WHICH HAVE BEEN ISSUED HERETOFORE ALL PRECEDING LISTS AND SUPPLEMENTS THERETO ARE VOID. The rules for inclusion in the list were formulated by the official representatives of those State milk sanitation agencies who have participated in the meetings of the National Conference of Interstate Milk Shipments.
    [Show full text]
  • Etir Code Lists
    eTIR Code Lists Code lists CL01 Equipment size and type description code (UN/EDIFACT 8155) Code specifying the size and type of equipment. 1 Dime coated tank A tank coated with dime. 2 Epoxy coated tank A tank coated with epoxy. 6 Pressurized tank A tank capable of holding pressurized goods. 7 Refrigerated tank A tank capable of keeping goods refrigerated. 9 Stainless steel tank A tank made of stainless steel. 10 Nonworking reefer container 40 ft A 40 foot refrigerated container that is not actively controlling temperature of the product. 12 Europallet 80 x 120 cm. 13 Scandinavian pallet 100 x 120 cm. 14 Trailer Non self-propelled vehicle designed for the carriage of cargo so that it can be towed by a motor vehicle. 15 Nonworking reefer container 20 ft A 20 foot refrigerated container that is not actively controlling temperature of the product. 16 Exchangeable pallet Standard pallet exchangeable following international convention. 17 Semi-trailer Non self propelled vehicle without front wheels designed for the carriage of cargo and provided with a kingpin. 18 Tank container 20 feet A tank container with a length of 20 feet. 19 Tank container 30 feet A tank container with a length of 30 feet. 20 Tank container 40 feet A tank container with a length of 40 feet. 21 Container IC 20 feet A container owned by InterContainer, a European railway subsidiary, with a length of 20 feet. 22 Container IC 30 feet A container owned by InterContainer, a European railway subsidiary, with a length of 30 feet. 23 Container IC 40 feet A container owned by InterContainer, a European railway subsidiary, with a length of 40 feet.
    [Show full text]
  • Eighteenth International Seapower Symposium: Report of the Proceedings
    U.S. Naval War College U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons International Seapower Symposium Events 10-2007 Eighteenth International Seapower Symposium: Report of the Proceedings The U.S. Naval War College Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/iss Recommended Citation Naval War College, The U.S., "Eighteenth International Seapower Symposium: Report of the Proceedings" (2007). International Seapower Symposium. 3. https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/iss/3 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Events at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Seapower Symposium by an authorized administrator of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Color profile: Disabled Composite Default screen EIGHTEENTH INTERNATIONAL SEAPOWER SYMPOSIUM Report of the Proceedings ISS18.prn C:\Documents and Settings\john.lanzieri.ctr\Desktop\NavalWarCollege\5164_NWC_ISS-18\Ventura\ISS18.vp Friday, August 28, 2009 3:11:10 PM Color profile: Disabled Composite Default screen ISS18.prn C:\Documents and Settings\john.lanzieri.ctr\Desktop\NavalWarCollege\5164_NWC_ISS-18\Ventura\ISS18.vp Friday, August 28, 2009 3:11:12 PM Color profile: Disabled Composite Default screen EIGHTEENTH INTERNATIONAL SEAPOWER SYMPOSIUM Report of the Proceedings 17–19 October 2007 Edited by John B. Hattendorf Ernest J. King Professor of Maritime History Naval War College with John W. Kennedy NAVAL WAR COLLEGE NEWPORT,RHODE ISLAND
    [Show full text]
  • EUROCONTROL History Book December 2010
    EUROCONTROL History Book December 2010 By John McInally Head of Organisational Development 1991 - 2010 EUROCONTROL Table of content Introduction 5 Executive summary 9 History of EUROCONTROL - Timeline 1910-2008 17 Part 1 1958-1966 25 Genesis of EUROCONTROL, original vision, sovereignty defined Part 2 1966-1986 75 EUROCONTROL continues with revised/reduced mandate Part 3 1986-1997 119 Amended Convention proves insufficient, matse takes key decisions, EUROCONTROL acts to revise Convention Part 4 1997-2008 191 Early Implementation, EUROCONTROL Adapts to Single European Sky, Growing Concentration on the Network Annex 1 Presidents and Vice-Presidents of the Permanent Commission 293 Annex 2 Presidents and Vice-Presidents of the Committee of management 295 Annex 3 Directors General of the Agency 298 Annex 4 Presidents and Vice-Presidents of the Provisional Council 299 Annex 5 Chairmen of the Civil-military Coordination Committee and military ATm Board 300 Annex 6 Ratification of the revised Convention 301 3 Introduction Introduction This History is a description of the key institutional, legal and organisational events and decisions that have determined the progress of the EUROCONTROL Organisation and its Agency through the past fifty years. It is a record, in one document, of the circumstances surrounding these events and the nature of the performance of EUROCONTROL against what was required of it. Who makes up the audience for this history? It is principally aimed at those past and present Eurocontrollers, including State representatives, as well as those who have been involved with EUROCONTROL at different times through the consultation groups and working arrangements. The reader should note therefore that this is a “History”.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Participants
    E SUB-COMMITTEE ON NAVIGATION, NCSR 6/INF.1 COMMUNICATIONS AND SEARCH AND 28 January 2019 RESCUE ENGLISH ONLY 6th session 16-25 January 2019 LIST OF PARTICIPANTS Chair: Mr. R. Lakeman (Netherlands) Vice Chair: Mr. N. Clifford (New Zealand) ALGERIA Head of Delegation Lt. Col. Khirdine Benslim, Maritime Attaché of the Permanent Mission of Algeria to IMO, Embassy of Algeria, London ANGOLA Head of Delegation Representative Mrs. Rosa Sobrinho, Senior Official, Ministry of Transport, Alternate Permanent Representative of the Republic of Angola to IMO, Embassy of the Republic of Angola, London H:\NCSR\6\NCSR 6-INF-1.docx - 2 - ARGENTINA Head of Delegation H.E. Sr. Holger Federico Martinsen, Representante Permanente de la República Argentina ante la OMI, Argentine Permanent Representation to IMO Advisers Sr. Ricardo Morelli Rubio, Secretario de Embajada, Representación de la República Argentina ante la OMI Sr. Hugo Gabriel Cafaro, Prefecto Mayor, Asesor Técnico Permanente de la Representación de la República Argentina ante la OMI, Prefectura Naval Argentina Capitán de Navío Pablo Bonuccelli, Asesor Técnico de la Armada Argentina, Argentine Permanent Representation to IMO Mr. Sergio Gabriel Cernadas, Prefecto, DIOP Cdr. Adrián Marcelo Mónaco, Armada Argentina AUSTRALIA Head of Delegation Mr. Nicholas Lemon, Manager, Systems Safety Standards, Australian Maritime Safety Authority (AMSA) Advisers Mr. Matthew John McGregor, Alternate Permanent Representative of Australia to IMO, Australian High Commission, London Ms. Louise Proctor, Principal Adviser, NSID AZERBAIJAN Head of Delegation Alternate Mr. Bakhtiyar Mammadzada, Head, LRIT NC, State Maritime Administration of the Republic of Azerbaijan Advisers Mr. Ayaz Azimov, State Maritime Administration of Azerbaijan Ms. Mina Babayeva, Specialist of Long Range Identification and Tracking System, State Maritime Administration of the Republic of Azerbaijan Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Drawings Traced from Scans Located in the Maritime Administration Collection at the Museum of American History
    HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD SAUGATUCK (AO-75) HAER No. VA-128 Location: James River Reserve Fleet, Newport News vicinity, Virginia Rig / Type of Craft: T2-SE-A1/Auxiliary Trade: Tanker Class: Suamico Hull No.: AO-75 Principal Dimensions: Length (oa): 523'-6" Beam: 68' Draft: 30' Displacement: 5,730 (lt) or 21,880 (fl) Gross tonnage: 10,448 tons Service speed: 15-½ knots (The listed dimensions are as built, but it should be noted that draft, displacement, and tonnages were subject to alteration over time as well as variations in measurement.) Dates of Construction: Keel laying: 20 August 1942 Launching: 7 December 1942 Delivery: 21 December 1942 Designer: U.S. Maritime Commission Builder: Sun Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company, Chester, Pennsylvania Present Owner: U.S. Maritime Administration Disposition: Scrapped in June 2006 Significance: Saugatuck is representative of the T2-SE-A1 tanker class, which became the workhorse for the U.S. Navy during World War II. There were 481 tankers constructed in this category under the U.S. Maritime Commission’s SAUGATUCK HAER No. VA-128 Page 2 Emergency Program between 1942 and 1945. These auxiliaries serviced the fleets engaged around the globe. Members of this class served in the U.S. Navy, Naval Transportation Service, and Military Sea Transportation Service—later Military Sealift Command. Historian: Brian Clayton, summer 2006 Project Information: This project is part of the Historic American Engineering Record (HAER), a long-range program to document historically significant engineering and industrial works in the United States. The Heritage Documentation Programs of the National Park Service, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • European Network Operations Plan 2021 Rolling Seasonal Plan Edition 10 15 January 2021
    European Network Operations Plan 2021 Rolling Seasonal Plan Edition 10 15 January 2021 FOUNDING MEMBER NETWORK SUPPORTING EUROPEAN AVIATION MANAGER EUROCONTROL Network Management Directorate DOCUMENT CONTROL Document Title European Network Operations Plan Document Subtitle Rolling Seasonal Plan Document Reference Edition Number 10 Edition Validity Date 15-01-2021 Classification Green Status Released Issue Razvan Bucuroiu (NMD/ACD) Author(s) Stéphanie Vincent (NMD/ACD/OPL) Razvan Bucuroiu (NMD/ACD) Contact Person(s) Stéphanie Vincent (NMD/ACD/OPL) Edition Number: 10 Edition Validity Date: 15-01-2021 Classification: Green Page: i Page Validity Date: 15-01-2021 EUROCONTROL Network Management Directorate EDITION HISTORY Edition No. Validity Date Reason Sections Affected 0 12/10/2020 Mock-up version All 1 23/10/2020 Outlook period 26/10/20-06/12/20 As per checklist 2 30/10/2020 Outlook period 02/11/20-13/12/20 As per checklist 3 06/11/2020 Outlook period 09/11/20-20/12/20 As per checklist 4 13/11/2020 Outlook period 16/11/20-27/12/20 As per checklist 5 20/11/2020 Outlook period 23/11/20-03/01/21 As per checklist 6 27/11/2020 Outlook period 30/11/20-10/01/21 As per checklist 7 04/12/2020 Outlook period 07/12/20-17/01/21 As per checklist 8 11/12/2020 Outlook period 14/12/20-24/01/21 As per checklist 9 18/12/2020 Outlook period 21/12/20-31/01/21 As per checklist 10 15/01/2021 Outlook period 18/01/21-28/02/21 As per checklist Edition Number: 10 Edition Validity Date: 15-01-2021 Classification: Green Page: ii Page Validity Date: 15-01-2021 EUROCONTROL
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter for the Baltics Week 33, 2018
    Royal Danish Embassy T. Kosciuskos 36, LT-01100 Vilnius Tel: +370 (5) 264 8768 Mob: +370 6995 7760 The Defence Attaché To Fax: +370 (5) 231 2300 Estonia, Latvia & Lithuania Newsletter for the Baltics Week 33, 2018 PRIMARY NEWS US attempts to bolster Baltic air defence capabilities (BNS) 13-14 August news: American army engineers are finishing installing a NATO-standard aviation shooting range area near the southeastern Lithuanian city of Kazlu Ruda. Defence experts say this area is important for bolstering air defence and protecting the so-called Suwalki Corridor, a strip of the Lithuanian-Polish border, considered NATO’s Achilles Heel. The newly installed training area will make it possible to train NATO ground and air personnel cooperation. Additionally, next year’s US defence budget law will call for a change in the NATO Baltic air-policing mission’s mandate, into that of an air defence mission. The air policing mission’s transition to an air defence mission would mean that fighter jets stationed in the Baltic mission for air policing would be able to carry out combat tasks in case of a crisis. SECONDARY NEWS Defence Forces fail to find Spanish Eurofighter missile in Endla reserve. (ERR) August 12 news: Commander of the Air Force, Col. Riivo Valge states that the missing missile could have penetrated the ground in the bog, and questions whether it will be discovered at all. Regardless, the Air Force will continue the search. Lithuanian government approves new cyber security strategy (BNS) 13 August news: Lithuania’s government approved a new national cyber security strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • MINUTE ITEM 47 04/28/93 PRC 7075 a Scott Gorfain Meier AUTIIORIZA
    MINUTE ITEM 47 04/28/93 PRC 7075 A Scott Gorfain Meier AUTIIORIZATION TO ISSUE INDUSTRIAL LEASE FOR OFFSHORE MARINE TERMINAL During consideration of Calendar Item 47, attached, extensive testimony was heard. Commission-Alternate Burton moved for approval of the second of three alternative sets of conditional recommendations made by staff. The motion called for issuance of a standard lease to the applicant with certain specified provisions. The motion was carried upon a vote of 2-1. (All correspondence received regarding this item is filed in the Work Order file.) CALENDAR.ITEM 47 A 35 04/28/93 PRC 7075 s 18 Scott Gorf ain Meier AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE INDUSTRIAL LEASE FOR OFFSHORE MARINE TERMINAL ! APPLICANT: I Gaviota Terminal Company (GTC) ! c/o Texaco Trading and Transportation, Inc. 1 101 East Victoria Street i 1 i" Santa Barbara, California 93101 ' AREA, TYPE LAND AND LOCATION: i A 74.309-acre parcel of tide and submerged land located in the Santa Barbara Channel at Gaviota, Santa Barbara County. LAND USE: Operation and maintenance of a marine terminal comprised of a six-point spread mooring.system and underwater pipelines for the transfer and loading of crude oil from Santa Barbara County to Los Angeles. PROPOSEDI LEASE TERMS: Lease period: . A maximum of. 2 years and 8 months beginning May 1, 1993, and ending no later than January 1, 1996, unless ·terminated earlier in accordance with other provisions of this lease. Surety bond: i $ 1,000,000 Public liability insurance: I Lessee is self insured in accordance with the program I on file in the Sacramento off ices of the Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Excerpts from the Report of the Commander of the Red Banner Baltic Fleet, Vice Admiral V
    EXCERPTS FROM THE REPORT OF THE COMMANDER OF THE RED BANNER BALTIC FLEET, VICE ADMIRAL V. F.TRIBUTS, REGARDING THE EXECUTION OF THE DIRECTIVE OF THE PEOPLES' COMMISSAR OF DEFENCE OF THE USSR OF JUNE 9 1940 ON OCCUPATION OF ESTONIA IN JUNE 1940. After 21 June 1940 Strictly classified EXCERPTS FROM THE REPORT (of the Commander of the Red Banner Baltic Fleet, Vice Admiral V.F. Tributs) Sheet 171. According to the Directive of the Peoples ' Commissar for Defence of the U.S.S.R No.-02622ss of 9 June 1940, the Red Banner Baltic Fleet was assigned the following missions: 1. To capture all vessels of the Estonian and Latvian naval forces both at bases as well as at sea, to capture the naval forces of Lithuania. 2. To capture mercantile marine and vessels of Estonia, Latvia, to disrupt sea connections between these countries. 3. To prepare and organise the landing of troops in Paldiski and Tallinn, to seize the ports of Tallinn and batteries on the islands Nargen and Vulf, to be prepared to seize the Suurupi battery from the mainland. 4. To block the Gulf of Riga and the coasts of Estonia and Latvia on the Gulf of Finland and the Baltic Sea, to prevent evacuation of the governments of these countries or troops and property. 5. To organise permanent and secure patrol service: on the Gulf of Finland - from the direction of Finland, and on the Baltic Sea - from the direction of Sweden and from the south. 6. To assist, in close collaboration with armed forces, the troops of the Leningrad military district in their advance towards Rakvere.
    [Show full text]
  • The Design and Service Experience of the Polar Endeavour Class Tankers
    The Design and Service Experience of the Polar Endeavour Class Tankers Robert A. Levine1, (M) SNAME, (M) IMarEST, C.Eng., Manager Engineering Integration & Naval Architecture, ConocoPhillips Marine ABSTRACT The Polar Endeavour (Millennium) Class Tankers, represent the first U. S. flag crude oil carriers designed and built for the Alaskan Trade in compliance with the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA90). These vessels represent the start of a revolution in design for American crude carriers. Not only are they fitted with double hulls, which are deeper than required, but also they are fitted with twin independent engine rooms, and twin rudders. They are the first vessels to be classed R2- S+ and NIBS under the American Bureau of Shipping’s (ABS) Guidelines for Redundant Propulsion Systems and Navigation Integrated Bridge Systems. The vessels meet the requirements for Annex VI of MARPOL for air emissions, and are painted with tin free (TBT) anti-foul paints. This paper describes the design development process used and the unique and innovated design, which resulted. Three vessels have entered service in 2001, 2002 and 2003 and two are under construction for delivery in 2004 and 2005. 1 The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not reflect those of Polar Tankers Inc., ConocoPhillips Marine, ConocoPhillips Alaska or the ConocoPhillips Corporation. 1 ACRONYMS +A1E Compliance with ABS Rules for Self- KW Kilowatts Propelled Vessels & Equipment LAN Local Area Network (Computer) Standards LBP Length Between Perpendiculars
    [Show full text]
  • Appeal to Mariners, Harbour Masters and Ship Owners
    Appeal to Mariners, Harbour masters and Ship Owners Report to Maritime Administration of Latvia if: - information provided in this book does not correspond with the real-life situation; - mistakes or inaccuracies have been found in this book; - there is information regarding real or suspected new dangers to navigation. Maritime Administration of Latvia contacts Trijādības Street 5, Rīga, Latvia, LV-1048 Phones: +371 67 062 101 e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] www.lja.lv www.lhd.lv ISBN 978-9984-628-72-1 Published by Maritime Administration of Latvia, 2002 The contents of this publication are protected by copyright and without special permission or agreement must not be reproduced in any way, shape or form. Maritime Administration of Latvia, 2021 Translation provided by Daina Gross, 2014. Updates: September 2021 Notices to Mariners: 2021: 103, 212, 243, 244, 245 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents .....................................................................................................................................................3 PART A .....................................................................................................................................................................5 Preface ..............................................................................................................................................................5 A.1. Sources ......................................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]