DOCSLIB.ORG

Etir Code Lists

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

eTIR Code Lists Code lists CL01 Equipment size and type description code (UN/EDIFACT 8155) Code specifying the size and type of equipment. 1 Dime coated tank A tank coated with dime. 2 Epoxy coated tank A tank coated with epoxy. 6 Pressurized tank A tank capable of holding pressurized goods. 7 Refrigerated tank A tank capable of keeping goods refrigerated. 9 Stainless steel tank A tank made of stainless steel. 10 Nonworking reefer container 40 ft A 40 foot refrigerated container that is not actively controlling temperature of the product. 12 Europallet 80 x 120 cm. 13 Scandinavian pallet 100 x 120 cm. 14 Trailer Non self-propelled vehicle designed for the carriage of cargo so that it can be towed by a motor vehicle. 15 Nonworking reefer container 20 ft A 20 foot refrigerated container that is not actively controlling temperature of the product. 16 Exchangeable pallet Standard pallet exchangeable following international convention. 17 Semi-trailer Non self propelled vehicle without front wheels designed for the carriage of cargo and provided with a kingpin. 18 Tank container 20 feet A tank container with a length of 20 feet. 19 Tank container 30 feet A tank container with a length of 30 feet. 20 Tank container 40 feet A tank container with a length of 40 feet. 21 Container IC 20 feet A container owned by InterContainer, a European railway subsidiary, with a length of 20 feet. 22 Container IC 30 feet A container owned by InterContainer, a European railway subsidiary, with a length of 30 feet. 23 Container IC 40 feet A container owned by InterContainer, a European railway subsidiary, with a length of 40 feet. eTIR Code Lists; 0.4 Issue date: 11-4-2008 Print date: 31-10-2017 Page: 1 / 1 Generated by GEFEG.FX eTIR Code Lists Code lists 24 Refrigerated tank 20 feet A refrigerated tank with a length of 20 feet. 25 Refrigerated tank 30 feet A refrigerated tank with a length of 30 feet. 26 Refrigerated tank 40 feet A refrigerated tank with a length of 40 feet. 27 Tank container IC 20 feet A tank container owned by InterContainer, a European railway subsidiary, with a length of 20 feet. 28 Tank container IC 30 feet A tank container owned by InterContainer, a European railway subsidiary, with a length of 30 feet. 29 Tank container IC 40 feet A tank container, owned by InterContainer, a European railway subsidiary, with a length of 40 feet. 30 Refrigerated tank IC 20 feet A refrigerated tank owned by InterContainer, a European railway subsidiary, with a length of 20 feet. 31 Temperature controlled container 30 ft. Temperature controlled container measuring 30 feet. 32 Refrigerated tank IC 40 feet A refrigerated tank owned by InterContainer, a European railway subsidiary, with a length of 40 feet. 33 Movable case: L < 6,15m A movable case with a length less than 6,15 metres. 34 Movable case: 6,15m < L < 7,82m A movable case with a length between 6,15 metres and 7,82 metres. 35 Movable case: 7,82m < L < 9,15m A movable case with a length between 7,82 metres and 9,15 metres. 36 Movable case: 9,15m < L < 10,90m A movable case with a length between 9,15 metres and 10,90 metres. 37 Movable case: 10,90m < L < 13,75m A movable case with a length between 10,90 metres and 13,75 metres. 38 Totebin A steel open top unit of about 1,5 * 1,5 * 2,5 meters for road transport of bulk cargo. 39 Temperature controlled container 20 ft Temperature controlled container measuring 20 feet. 40 Temperature controlled container 40 ft A temperature controlled container measuring 40 feet. 41 Non working refrigerated (reefer) container 30ft. A 30 foot refrigerated (reefer) container that is not actively cooling the product. 42 Dual trailers Two trailers linked together one behind another and pulled by one tractor. 43 20 ft IL container (open top) An open top container that is 20 feet in internal length. eTIR Code Lists; 0.4 Issue date: 11-4-2008 Print date: 31-10-2017 Page: 2 / 2 Generated by GEFEG.FX eTIR Code Lists Code lists 44 20 ft IL container (closed top) A closed top container that is 20 feet in internal length. 45 40 ft IL container (closed top) A closed top container that is 40 feet in internal length. eTIR Code Lists; 0.4 Issue date: 11-4-2008 Print date: 31-10-2017 Page: 3 / 3 Generated by GEFEG.FX eTIR Code Lists Code lists CL02 Party role code (UN/EDIFACT 3035) Code giving specific meaning to a party. AA Party to be billed (AAR Accounting rule 11) Party to be billed in accordance with AAR Accounting rule 11. AB Buyer's agent/representative Third party who arranged the purchase of merchandise on behalf of the actual buyer. AE Declarant's agent/representative Any natural or legal person who makes a declaration to an official body on behalf of another natural or legal person, where legally permitted (CCC). AF Transit principal Natural or legal person responsible for the satisfactory performance of a Customs transit operation. Source: CCC. AG Agent (3196) Party authorized to act on behalf of another party. Synonym: Representative. AH Transit principal's agent/representative Agent acting on behalf of the transit principal (CCC). AI Successful job applicant Person who has been chosen for a job. AJ Party issuing mutually agreed codes The party which has issued all mutually agreed codes used in the message. AK Acknowledgement recipient Party to whom acknowledgement should be sent. AL Principal responsible party (3340) Party accepting liability for goods held or moving (e.g. transit) under a Customs authorization and - when applicable - a guarantee. AM Authorized official Employee of a company or firm authorized to act on behalf of that company or firm e.g. to make a Customs declaration. AN Approved importer Person or company which is authorised by the relevant Customs authority to import goods without payment all taxes or specific taxes at the point of entry into the country. AO Account of Party account is assigned to. AP Accepting party (3336) Party accepting goods, products, services, etc. AQ Approved consignor Person or company approved by the relevant authority in the country to pack and export specific goods under Customs supervision. AR Authorized exporter Exporter authorized/approved by Customs for special Customs procedures e.g. simplified procedure. eTIR Code Lists; 0.4 Print date: 31-10-2017 Page: 4/ 4 eTIR Code Lists Code lists AS Account servicing financial institution Identifies the financial institution servicing the account(s). AT Authorized importer Importer authorized/approved by Customs for special Customs procedures e.g. simplified procedure. AU Authorized trader (transit) Trader authorized/approved by Customs for special transit procedures e.g. simplified procedure. AV Authorizing official Party that has delegated the authority to take a certain action on behalf of a company or agency. AW Applicant's bank (3234) Financial institution which is requested to issue the documentary credit. AX Authenticating party Party which certifies that a document is authentic. AY Animal being investigated Animal being investigated. AZ Issuing bank Financial institution which issues the documentary credit, if the applicant's bank is not acting as the issuing bank. B1 Contact bank 1 Identifies an additional bank which must be informed of certain aspects of the message. B2 Contact bank 2 Identifies an additional bank which must be informed of certain aspects of the message. BA Booking agent Party acting as a booking office for transport and forwarding services. BB Buyer bank identification [3421]To identify a bank employed by the buyer to make a payment. BC Negotiating bank Financial institution to whom a negotiable documentary credit is directed. BD Documentary credit reimbursing bank A financial institution which reimburses documentary credit. BE Beneficiary The ultimate recipient of the funds. Normally the account owner who is reimbursed by the payer. BF Beneficiary's bank Identifies the account servicer for the beneficiary or the payee. BG Employer A party that keeps a person in service for payment. BH Previous employer Previous employer of a person(s). BI Buyer's financial institution Financial institution designated by buyer to make payment. BJ Release to party Party to which the goods or container(s) is (are) to be released. eTIR Code Lists; 0.4 Print date: 31-10-2017 Page: 5/ 5 eTIR Code Lists Code lists BK Financial institution Party acting as financial institution. BL Bill of lading recipient Party to receive B/L. BM Insured Party which is the object of an insurance contract. BN Insurance beneficiary Party which benefits from insurance coverage. BO Broker or sales office Party acting in the name of the seller as broker or as sales office. BP Building site purchaser Party at the building site responsible for the purchasing of goods and services for that particular site. BQ Cheque drawn bank Identifies the bank on which the cheque should be drawn, as instructed by the ordering customer. BS Bill and ship to Party receiving goods and relevant invoice. BT Party to be billed for other than freight (bill to) Party receiving invoice excluding freight costs. BU Service bureau Party carrying out service bureau processing work, (e.g. a payroll bureau). BV Member Member of a group (e.g. of a group of persons or a service scheme). BW Borrower A person who acquires something temporarily with the promise or intention of returning. BX Building site engineer Party at the building site responsible for engineering matters for that particular site. BY Buyer [3002] Party to which merchandise or services are sold.
Recommended publications
  • Community Center Rojc, Pula, Croatia

    Community Center Rojc, Pula, Croatia

    SOLIDARITY MOVERS OF ROJC Community center Rojc, Pula, Croatia CONTENT Community center Rojc Rojc Alliance About the project Activities About Pula Currency How to get to Pula Meet the team Contact Follow us Community center Rojc is a unique space Community for culture and civil society. Situated in a repurposed building that forms part of the cultural heritage of Pula, the center gathers center Rojc over a hundred organisations under one roof while also hosting numerous cultural and social events. The center is polivalent space with wide spectrum of activities: culture, sports, psychosocial care and health services, activities for children and youth, care for the disabled, environmental protection, technical culture, ethnic minorities, etc. Community center Rojc is a member of Trans Europe Halles. Rojc Alliance The Rojc Alliance is a network of Rojc organizations that presents and represents common interests, promotes mutual cooperation and carries out community actions and events. Main activities of Rojc Alliance are: management and events in Rojc public spaces - the Living room and inner courtyard; community radio Radio Rojc; community development programs; participatory governance; networking and fostering development of cultural and community centers; European Solidarity Corps volunteering progams. The Rojc Alliance has formed a kind of civic-public partnership with the City of Pula, which co- governs the center and encourages its development. WHAT WE DO The center is a host to 110 associations from various fields. Thousands of Rojc inhabitants and their visitors pass through its painted hallways each week – bringing vivid influence to the community life. PROJECT NAME Solidarity movers of Rojc PROJECT DURATION 1.8.2019.
  • Annex 10 PDF Page Vanderlaan, ASM, Taggart, CT, Serdynska, AR

    Annex 10 PDF Page Vanderlaan, ASM, Taggart, CT, Serdynska, AR

    Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) Annex 10 PDF Page Vanderlaan, A.S.M., Taggart, C.T., Serdynska, A.R., Kenney, R.D., and Brown, M.W. 2008. 2 Reducing the risk of lethal encounters: vessels and right whales in the Bay of Fundy and on the Scotian Shelf. Endang. Spec. Res. 4:283–297. Veirs, S., Veirs, V., and Wood, J.D. 2016. Ship noise extends to frequencies used for 17 echolocation by endangered killer whales. PeerJ, 4, p.e1657. Yang, Z., Hollebone, B.P., Zhang, G., Brown, C.E., Yang, C., Lambert, P., Wang, Z., 53 Landriault, M., and Shah, K. 2017. Fate of Photodegraded Diluted Bitumen in Seawater, Proceedings of the 2017 International Oil Spill Conference, American Petroleum Institute, Washington, D.C., pp. 2286-2305. Yang, Z., Zhang, G., Hollebone, B.P., Brown, C.E., Yang, C., Lambert, P., Landriault, M., 73 and Shah, K. 2017. Fate of Oxygenated Components for Solar Irradiated Diluted Bitumen in Saltwater, Proceedings of the Fortieth AMOP Technical Seminar on Environmental Contamination and Response, pp. 415-440, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Ottawa, ON. Yang, Z., Zhang, G., Hollebone, B.P., Brown, C.E., Yang, C., Lambert, P., Wang, Z., 99 Landriault, M., and Shah, K. 2017. Fate of Oxygenated Components for Solar Irradiated Diluted Bitumen Mixed with Seawater, Environmental Pollution, Vol. 231, pp. 622-634, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.08.043. Yergeau, E., Maynard, C., Sanschagrin, S., Champagne, J., Juck, D., Lee, K., and Greer, C. 112 2015. Microbial Community Composition, Functions, and Activities in the Gulf of Mexico 1 Year after the Deepwater Horizon Accident.
  • D6.4 Case Study D

    D6.4 Case Study D

    Grant Agreement Number: INEA/CEF/TRAN/M2018/179967 Project acronym: SLAIN Project full title: Saving Lives Assessing and Improving TEN-T Road Network Safety D. 1.0 Due delivery date: 31st March 2021 Actual delivery date: 13th March 2021 Organisation name of lead participant for this deliverable: RSI ‘Panos Mylonas’ D6.4: Activity 6 case studies group D Co-financed by the Connecting Europe Facility of the European Union SLAIN 1 V1.3 Document Control Sheet Version Input by Consortium partners History V1.0 Version for submission to INEA Legal Disclaimer The information in this document is provided “as is”, and no guarantee or warranty is given that the information is fit for any particular purpose. The above referenced consortium members shall have no liability for damages of any kind including without limitation direct, special, indirect, or consequential damages that may result from the use of these materials subject to any liability which is mandatory due to applicable law. © 2020 by SLAIN Consortium. Acknowledgement The SLAIN beneficiaries are grateful to EuroRAP and iRAP for the research information provided. The report was coordinated and prepared by RSI Panos Mylonas, supported by iRAP and the Road Safety Foundation, with liaison with INEA by the project coordinator EuroRAP. Individual project partners provided the case studies. Abbreviations and Acronyms Acronym Abreviation SLAIN Saving Lives Assessing and Improving Network Safety TEN-T Trans-European Network - Transport GIS Geographic Information System SRIP Safer Roads Investment Plans RSA Road Safety Audit RSI Road Safety Inspection SLAIN 2 Version 1.0 Table of Contents 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 4 1.1 SLAIN project objectives ...................................................................................................................
  • Health Insurance Zagreb

    Health Insurance Zagreb

    Health Insurance for LES Embassy of the United States of America Zagreb, Croatia Combined Synopsis and Solicitation 19GE5021R0013 Questions and Answers Q1: Please provide five years of loss data(table 1) by year of account including annual net premium (for the same period), incurred claims and membership history. For membership history (Table 2) please provide the number of Employees with single coverage and with family coverage at the end of each year. Please do not include any confidential information, just the overall statistics for the group. Claims information is critical to our pricing and the relationship of claims to employee growth or shrinkage is part of the claims analysis. Table 1 Contractual year Total claims Retention Total Net gain Net gain paid (local amount premium (local USD or EUR currency) (local paid to currency) currency) Insurer (local currency) dd/mm/2016 – dd/mm/2017 dd/mm/2017 – dd/mm/2018 dd/mm/2018 – dd/mm/2019 dd/mm/2019 – dd/mm/2020 dd/mm/2020 – dd/mm/2021 Table 2 Contractual year Single Self plus ONE Family plans dd/mm/2016 – dd/mm/2017 dd/mm/2017 – dd/mm/2018 dd/mm/2018 – dd/mm/2019 dd/mm/2019 – dd/mm/2020 dd/mm/2020 – dd/mm/2021 A1: This is a first-time post is contracting this service, historical data is not available. Q2 : We would like to know if you have been informed of Catastrophic cases, such as: Hemodynamics, Open Heart Surgery, Orthopedic Mayor Surgeries, Organ Transplant, Traumatic Accident, Cancer and Oncology Cases (Radio and Chemotherapy), and hospitalizations with more than 10 days A2: The U.S.
  • Nomination Requirements

    Nomination Requirements

    Nomination Requirements For the Michigan Blue Ribbon Exemplary Schools Program Prepared by: Grissom Middle School 35701 Ryan Road Sterling Heights, MI 48310 586-825-2560 Mrs. Suzanne Nye, Principal Warren Consolidated Schools Dr. James Clor, Superintendent PREPARATION OF SCHOOL SELF-ASSESSMENT STAKEHOLDERS POSITION Sue Fragnoli Co-Chair/Counselor Danielle McLean Co-Chair/Teacher Carol Klaiman Teacher/Editor/Section G Leader Sharon Fitzhenry Teacher/Editor Barbara Sikora Teacher Michelle Partridge Teacher Sandy Hawrys Secretary Karen Blaske Teacher/Section F Co-Leader Nancy Campbell Teacher/Section E Co-Leader Barbara Jones Teacher/Section H Leader Irina Hirchberger Teacher/Section C Leader Victor Kolpak Teacher/Section F Co-Leader Bob Maus Teacher/Section E Co-Leader Jennifer Pisha Teacher/Section A Leader Jacquelyn Walters Teacher/Section B Leader Heather Wasmuth Teacher/Section D Leader Dena Berke Teacher Sylvia Buck Teacher Eileen Byrnes Teacher Marge Czarnik Teacher Patrick Dailey Teacher Dave Elliott Teacher Sally Erdelean Teacher Ronna Fisher Counselor Christine Gluszewski Teacher Jeff Gray Teacher Judy Gregory Teacher Christine Guerreso Teacher Michael Gurney Teacher Heidi Kuhn Teacher Sue MacQuarrie Teacher Samar Mansour Teacher Tari Michaelson Teacher Patricia Mulholland Teacher Elizabeth Rinehart Teacher David Rodriquez Teacher Yvette Searle Teacher Jeff Skwier Teacher Debbie Tesch Teacher Justin Watson Teacher Marsha White Teacher Jeanne Yasso Teacher Elizabeth Zachary Teacher 2 PART I: ELIGIBILITY CERTIFICATION The signatures on the first page of this nomination package certify that each of the statements below concerning the school’s eligibility, previous recognition in the Blue Ribbon Schools Program, and compliance with U.S. Department of Education, Office of Civil Rights (OCR) requirements is true and correct.
  • Spanish National Action Framework for Alternative Energy in Transport

    Spanish National Action Framework for Alternative Energy in Transport

    INTERMINISTERIAL GROUP FOR GOVERNMENT COORDINATION OF THE NATIONAL ACTION FRAMEWORK FOR OF SPAIN ALTERNATIVE ENERGY IN TRANSPORT NATIONAL ACTION FRAMEWORK FOR ALTERNATIVE ENERGY IN TRANSPORT MARKET DEVELOPMENT AND DEPLOYMENT OF ALTERNATIVE FUELS INFRASTRUCTURE. IN COMPLIANCE WITH DIRECTIVE 2014/94/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL, OF 22 OCTOBER 2014. 14 OCTOBER 2016 COORDINATED BY SECRETARIAT-GENERAL FOR INDUSTRY AND SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES PRESIDENCY OF THE INTERMINISTERIAL GROUP INTERMINISTERIAL GROUP FOR GOVERNMENT COORDINATION OF THE NATIONAL ACTION FRAMEWORK FOR OF SPAIN ALTERNATIVE ENERGY IN TRANSPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 9 I.1. PRESENTATION OF DIRECTIVE 2014/94/EU......................................... 9 I.2. BACKGROUND.................................................................................... 10 I.3. PREPARATION OF THE NATIONAL ACTION FRAMEWORK......................... 13 II. ALTERNATIVE ENERGY IN THE TRANSPORT SECTOR............................................. 17 II.1. NATURAL GAS.................................................................................... 17 II.2. ELECTRICITY..................................................................................... 21 II.3. LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS.............................................................. 23 II.4. HYDROGEN………………………………………..…………................. 26 II.5. BIOFUELS…………………………………………….………………….. 28 III. ROAD TRANSPORT…………………………………………..………..…………….
  • Wärtsilä Ship Design References

    Wärtsilä Ship Design References

    WÄRTSILÄ SHIP DESIGN REFERENCES Conversions/ upgrades/ modifications © Wärtsilä NOT YET CLASSIFIED SK 4209 BIT VIKING SCOPE OF SUPPLY ADDITIONAL • Ship Design • NOx measurement during • Engine conversion sea trial DF and • LNGPac system (2 x • LNGPac training for 500m3) personnel • Gas supply units • Torque meter for power measurement • Bunkering system • Gas piping (single and double walled) • Exhaust system • Fire-fighting upgrade • Gas detection system • Electrical system © Wärtsilä NOT YET CLASSIFIED CALA SERIES HIGHLIGHTS WSD SCOPE • Reefer vessels (4 no.’s) • Basic design • Lloyd Werft Bremerhaven • Detail design GmbH (Germany) • Steel production documentation CONVERSION SCOPE • Lengthening for increase of cargo capacity © Wärtsilä NOT YET CLASSIFIED M/T FOUR MOON HIGHLIGHTS WSD SCOPE • OBO carrier, 54,500dwt • Basic design conversion to 65,000 DWT • Detail design Crude oil tanker • Steel production documentation CONVERSION SCOPE • Lengthening for increase of cargo capacity © Wärtsilä NOT YET CLASSIFIED PETROTRYM HIGHLIGHTS WSD SCOPE • Product/Crude oil tanker • Basic design • 82,000 DWT • Detail design • Steel production CONVERSION SCOPE documentation • Conversion to buoy loader/shuttle tanker © Wärtsilä NOT YET CLASSIFIED M/T NCC ARAR, M/T NCC ASIR, M/T BOW HUNTER HIGHLIGHTS WSD SCOPE • Chemical tankers • Basic design • 22,500 DWT • Tender documentation package MODIFICATION SCOPE • Refitted with innershell © Wärtsilä NOT YET CLASSIFIED M/T JO BREVIK, M/T JO CLIPPER, M/T JO LIND, M/T JO BIRK, M/T JO OAK HIGHLIGHTS • Refitted with
  • Northern Arizona Freight Analysis Phase I, May 2004

    Northern Arizona Freight Analysis Phase I, May 2004

    Acknowledgements This report was funded, in part, by the Arizona Department of Transportation, the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration. Additional funding was made available through the Arizona Department of Commerce Rural Economic Development Initiative. Contact Information Dave Wessel-Co-Project Manager Transportation Planner Flagstaff MPO City of Flagstaff 211 W Aspen Flagstaff, AZ 86001 928-779-7658 phone 928-556-0940 fax Chris Fetzer-Co-Project Manager Transportation/Environmental Planning Director Northern Arizona Council of Governments 119 E. Aspen Flagstaff, AZ 86001 928-213-5200 phone 928-773-1135 fax [email protected] Don Breazeale, Consultant Don Breazeale and Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 7121 2 Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 858-759-8321 phone 760-942-9217 fax [email protected] 3 Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................. 1 CONTACT INFORMATION................................................................ 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS..................................................................... 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................... 5 DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS ........................................... 30 TRENDS ANALYSIS........................................................................ 33 SITE ANALYSIS .............................................................................. 80 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IMPACT ANALYSIS ....................... 98 ARIZONA JOB GROWTH ............................................................
  • Sustainable Financing Review for Croatia Protected Areas

    Sustainable Financing Review for Croatia Protected Areas

    The World Bank Sustainable Financing Review for Croatia Protected Areas October 2009 www.erm.com Delivering sustainable solutions in a more competitive world The World Bank /PROFOR Sustainable Financing Review for Croatia Protected Areas October 2009 Prepared by: James Spurgeon (ERM Ltd), Nick Marchesi (Pescares), Zrinca Mesic (Oikon) and Lee Thomas (Independent). For and on behalf of Environmental Resources Management Approved by: Eamonn Barrett Signed: Position: Partner Date: 27 October 2009 This report has been prepared by Environmental Resources Management the trading name of Environmental Resources Management Limited, with all reasonable skill, care and diligence within the terms of the Contract with the client, incorporating our General Terms and Conditions of Business and taking account of the resources devoted to it by agreement with the client. We disclaim any responsibility to the client and others in respect of any matters outside the scope of the above. This report is confidential to the client and we accept no responsibility of whatsoever nature to third parties to whom this report, or any part thereof, is made known. Any such party relies on the report at their own risk. Environmental Resources Management Limited Incorporated in the United Kingdom with registration number 1014622 Registered Office: 8 Cavendish Square, London, W1G 0ER CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 BACKGROUND 1 1.2 AIMS 2 1.3 APPROACH 2 1.4 STRUCTURE OF REPORT 3 1.5 WHAT DO WE MEAN BY SUSTAINABLE FINANCE 3 2 PA FINANCING IN CROATIA 5 2.1 CATEGORIES OF PROTECTED
  • Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030)

    Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030)

    Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030) Republic of Croatia MINISTRY OF THE SEA, TRANSPORT AND INFRASTRUCTURE Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 - 2030) 2nd Draft April 2017 The project is co-financed by the European Union from the European Regional Development Fund. Republic of Croatia Ministry of the Sea, Transport and Infrastructure I Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background on development of a Croatian Comprehensive National Transport Plan .................................................. 1 1.2 Objectives of the Transport Development Strategy (TDS 2016) ............................. 4 1.3 Revision of the TDS (2016) Ex-Ante conditionality .................................................. 4 1.4 Methodology for the development of the TDS (2016) ............................................ 5 2 Analysis .................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 General aspects of transport ................................................................................... 7 2.2 Public transport and zero-emission modes ........................................................... 34 2.3 Rail Transport......................................................................................................... 72 2.4 Road transport
  • Route Evaluation Report Croatia Eurovelo 8 – Mediterranean Route

    Route Evaluation Report Croatia Eurovelo 8 – Mediterranean Route

    Route Evaluation Report Croatia EuroVelo 8 – Mediterranean Route MEDCYCLETOUR Project Davorin Belamarić April 27th 2018 Contents 1 Background ......................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Mission of the project and report objectives ................................................................. 5 1.2 Organization ................................................................................................................ 7 1.3 Brief methodological explanations ................................................................................ 8 1.3.1 Different phases of the route evaluation ................................................................ 8 1.3.2 ECS – European Certification Standard used for this evaluation ........................... 9 1.3.3 Used tools and equipment, photographs ..............................................................10 1.4 Overview of the sections .............................................................................................10 2 Infrastructure ......................................................................................................................16 2.1 Existing route infrastructure ........................................................................................16 2.1.1 Public transport ....................................................................................................19 2.2 Critical deficiencies .....................................................................................................30
  • Autocesta Zagreb – Sisak

    Autocesta Zagreb – Sisak

    A 11 AUTOCESTA ZAGREB – SISAK Zagreb, ožujak 2006. SEKTOR ZA GRAĐENJE ODJEL ZA PROJEKTIRANJE A 11 AUTOCESTA ZAGREB - SISAK OPĆENITO Programom prostornog uređenja Republike Hrvatske iz 1999. godine autocesta Zagreb - Sisak pripada prvoj skupini prioriteta koji su od važnosti za državu. Trasa počinje na obilaznici Zagreba kod mjesta Jakuševec u čvorištu Jakuševec te završava spojem na postojeću državnu cestu D37 Sisak - Petrinja. Autocesta je duljine ~ 47,5 km uključivo i odvojak za privremeni spoj na D37 duljine ~1,2 km. Grad Sisak će se preko čvora Sisak spojiti na autocestu te je predviđena spojna cesta za Sisak duljine ~ 3 km koja se spaja na glavnu os autoceste. Južni ulaz u grad Zagreb u dužini od cca 1.3 km predviđen je nadvožnjakom iznad ranžirnog kolodvora i spojem na produženu Sarajevsku ulicu. Postojeća prometna infrastruktura (državna cesta D30 i D36) koja spaja Zagreb i Sisak ne zadovoljava potrebe suvremenog prometa, te će se planiranom autocestom povezati najznačajnija gospodarska žarišta u Hrvatskoj koristeći najpovoljnije prirodne mogućnosti za vođenje prometnice. TRASA Trasa je “postavljena” na osnovu dosadašnjih istraživanja koridora Zagreb – Sisak i nalazi se unutar koridora predviđenog za tu autocestu iz prostornih planova Zagrebačke i Sisačko-moslavačke županije. Autocesta ima glavne spojeve na postojeću mrežu u području Zagreb – Velika Gorica (A 3: Bregana – Zagreb – Lipovac, te D 30: Velika Gorica – Petrinja – H. Kostajnica i D 31: Velika Gorica – Pokupsko) i u području Sisak – Petrinja (D 36 Pokupsko – Sisak i D 37: Sisak – Petrinja – Glina). Spomenuti spojevi su čvorišta “Jakuševec” i “Velika Gorica – jug” te priključci Veliko Polje i Velika Gorica u području Zagreb – Velika Gorica, dok su u području Sisak – Petrinja to čvorišta “Sisak” i “Mošćenica”, te čvorišta “Lekenik” kao spoj na D 30 preko Ž 3230 i “Buševec” kao spoj na Ž 3116.