DOCSLIB.ORG

College Park Joint Development Environmental Evaluation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
College Park Joint Development Environmental Evaluation College Park Joint Development Environmental Evaluation Prepared by: Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority March 2017 COLLEGE PARK JOINT DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION This page is intentionally left blank. COLLEGE PARK JOINT DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 4 2. EXISTING SITE DESCRIPTION............................................................................ 6 2.1 Metrorail .................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Bus Service ............................................................................................................... 8 2.2.1 College Park – White Flint Line (C8) ........................................................... 8 2.2.2 New Carrollton – Fort Totten Line (F6) ........................................................ 8 2.2.3 College Park – Bethesda Line (J4) .............................................................. 8 2.2.4 Kenilworth Avenue Line (R12) ..................................................................... 8 2.2.5 College Park Line (83/83X) .......................................................................... 9 2.2.6 College Park Line (86) ................................................................................. 9 2.2.7 RTA (302/G) ................................................................................................. 9 2.2.8 TheBus 14 .................................................................................................... 9 2.2.9 TheBus 17 .................................................................................................... 9 2.2.10 University of Maryland Shuttle 104 .............................................................. 9 2.2.11 University of Maryland Shuttle 109 .............................................................. 9 2.2.12 Maryland MTA 204 ..................................................................................... 11 2.3 MARC ...................................................................................................................... 11 2.4 Park & Ride ............................................................................................................. 11 2.5 Kiss & Ride .............................................................................................................. 11 2.6 Pedestrian and Bicycle Access ............................................................................... 11 2.7 MTA Purple Line (Planned) ..................................................................................... 12 3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................. 12 3.1 Park & Ride Lot ....................................................................................................... 12 3.2 Park & Ride Garage ................................................................................................ 12 3.3 Kiss & Ride Lot ........................................................................................................ 12 3.4 Bus Loop and Layover Spaces ............................................................................... 12 3.5 Joint Development .................................................................................................. 12 3.5.1 Developer Selection ................................................................................... 12 4. PROJECT IMPACTS .......................................................................................... 15 4.1 Land Acquisitions and Displacements .................................................................... 15 4.2 Transportation ......................................................................................................... 15 4.2.1 Parking ....................................................................................................... 15 4.2.2 Traffic ......................................................................................................... 15 4.2.3 Metrorail ..................................................................................................... 15 4.2.4 Metrobus and Other Bus Routes ............................................................... 16 4.2.5 Pedestrian and Bicycle Access .................................................................. 16 4.3 Land Use and Zoning .............................................................................................. 16 4.4 Planning Consistency.............................................................................................. 19 4.5 Neighborhoods and Community Facilities .............................................................. 21 4.6 Environmental Justice Populations ......................................................................... 23 4.6.1 Identification of Environmental Justice Populations................................... 23 4.6.2 Assessment of Disproportionately High and Adverse Impacts .................. 25 4.7 Cultural Resources.................................................................................................. 25 4.8 Public Parklands and Recreation Areas ................................................................. 25 4.9 Wetlands and Waters of the U.S. ............................................................................ 25 4.10 Floodplains .............................................................................................................. 25 4.11 Water Quality .......................................................................................................... 25 March 2017 i COLLEGE PARK JOINT DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 4.12 Air Quality ................................................................................................................ 26 4.13 Forest Stands .......................................................................................................... 28 4.14 Threatened and Endangered Species .................................................................... 28 4.15 Utilities ..................................................................................................................... 28 4.16 Safety and Security ................................................................................................. 28 4.17 Hazardous and Contaminated Materials ................................................................ 28 4.18 Noise and Vibration ................................................................................................. 29 4.19 Secondary and Cumulative Impacts ....................................................................... 29 4.19.1 Secondary Impacts .................................................................................... 29 4.19.2 Cumulative Impacts ................................................................................... 29 4.20 Construction Impacts .............................................................................................. 30 5. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT .................................................................................... 30 6. REFERENCES .................................................................................................... 30 March 2017 ii COLLEGE PARK JOINT DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION List of Figures Figure 1: Project Location ................................................................................................................ 5 Figure 2: Existing Transportation Facilities ...................................................................................... 7 Figure 3: Existing Bus Routes ........................................................................................................ 10 Figure 4: Joint Development Concept – Gilbane Development Company .....................................14 Figure 5: Existing Land Use ..........................................................................................................17 Figure 6: Existing Zoning .............................................................................................................. 18 Figure 7: Neighborhoods and Community Facilities ..................................................................... 22 Figure 8: Floodplains .................................................................................................................... 27 List of Tables Table 1: College Park – U of Md Metrorail Station Weekday Entry/Exit Averages .......................... 6 Table 2: Weekday Metrobus Route Statistics .................................................................................. 8 Table 3: Land Use and Transportation Plans ................................................................................ 19 Table 4: Minority and Low-Income Population by Block Group ..................................................... 23 Table 5: Minority Population by Geographic Area ......................................................................... 24 Appendices Appendix A: Project Concept Plan and Renderings Appendix B: USFWS IPaC Trust Resource Report March 2017 iii COLLEGE PARK JOINT DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 1. INTRODUCTION The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) has entered into an agreement with Gilbane Development Company (the developer). The developer is planning to construct a mixed-use joint development on the existing College Park – University
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Baltlink Rider Guide-944004A2.Pdf
    WHAT IS BALTIMORELINK? BaltimoreLink is a complete overhaul and rebranding of the core transit system operating within Baltimore City and the surrounding region. Many of MTA’s current bus routes are outdated, and BaltimoreLink will improve service through a more reliable and efficient network. BaltimoreLink also includes transfer facilities, dedicated bus lanes, signal priority, and improved bus stop signs, among many other improvements. To deliver an interconnected transit network, existing MTA bus and rail services will be restructured and renamed: • CityLink: Twelve new high-frequency, color-coded bus routes will connect with each other, as well as Metro SubwayLink, Light RailLink, MARC Train, Commuter Bus, Amtrak, and other services, into one integrated transit network. • LocalLink (currently Local Bus): LocalLink routes will provide comprehensive crosstown connections and improved connections to neighborhoods and communities throughout the system. • Express BusLink (currently Express Bus): Express BusLink will include several existing Express Bus services that provide suburb-to- city connections and recently launched routes providing suburb-to-suburb connections. Typically, Express Bus routes have fewer stops and use higher speed roads. • Light RailLink (currently Light Rail): Light Rail service will operate along the same line but with improved connections to buses. • Metro SubwayLink (currently Metro Subway): This service will not change but will have improved connections to buses. baltimorelink.com | 1 BETTER BUS STOPS BALTIMORELINK RESOURCE INFORMATION To create a better rider experience by providing information you can use, the MTA will be All MTA routes will change under installing new bus stop signs throughout the BaltimoreLink. Please look for Rider Alerts for entire MTA bus network.
    [Show full text]
  • Baltimore Region Rail System Plan Report
    Baltimore Region Rail System Plan Report of the Advisory Committee August 2002 Advisory Committee Imagine the possibilities. In September 2001, Maryland Department of Transportation Secretary John D. Porcari appointed 23 a system of fast, convenient and elected, civic, business, transit and community leaders from throughout the Baltimore region to reliable rail lines running throughout serve on The Baltimore Region Rail System Plan Advisory Committee. He asked them to recommend the region, connecting all of life's a Regional Rail System long-term plan and to identify priority projects to begin the Plan's implemen- important activities. tation. This report summarizes the Advisory Committee's work. Imagine being able to go just about everywhere you really need to go…on the train. 21 colleges, 18 hospitals, Co-Chairs 16 museums, 13 malls, 8 theatres, 8 parks, 2 stadiums, and one fabulous Inner Harbor. You name it, you can get there. Fast. Just imagine the possibilities of Red, Mr. John A. Agro, Jr. Ms. Anne S. Perkins Green, Blue, Yellow, Purple, and Orange – six lines, 109 Senior Vice President Former Member We can get there. Together. miles, 122 stations. One great transit system. EarthTech, Inc. Maryland House of Delegates Building a system of rail lines for the Baltimore region will be a challenge; no doubt about it. But look at Members Atlanta, Boston, and just down the parkway in Washington, D.C. They did it. So can we. Mr. Mark Behm The Honorable Mr. Joseph H. Necker, Jr., P.E. Vice President for Finance & Dean L. Johnson Vice President and Director of It won't happen overnight.
    [Show full text]
  • Dedicated Bus Lanes Dedicated Bus Lanes
    Rebuilding an Urban Bus Network in the 21st Century BaltimoreLink Goals . Improve service quality and reliability Linking Modes . Maximize access to high-frequency transit Places People . Strengthen connections between the MTA’s bus and rail routes Improving Safety . Align the network with existing and emerging Efficiency job centers Reliability . Involve riders, employees, communities, and Customer Service elected officials in the planning process Existing Service We’ve heard the existing transit system is… Broken Disconnected Crowded Unclean Major Problems Unreliable • Lengthy Routes – Long east-west and north-south Not connected to routes jobs • Highly Congested – Buses bottleneck due to network design • Unreliable – Network design hinders MTA’s ability to provide reliable service The Solution – The BaltimoreLink Network BaltimoreLink is a new kind of “grid and spoke” transit network offering three classes of service that reinforce the existing Metro SubwayLink, Light RailLink, and MARC Train systems: CityLink These color-coded “BRT ready” routes offer frequent, 24-hour service, form a downtown grid, and radiate out from the city on major streets. LocalLink These operate on neighborhood streets between the CityLinks and form crosstown “rings.” Express BusLink These offer limited-stop service between outlying areas and downtown. In Spring 2016 an express beltway “ring” was also created for the first time ever! Components of a Frequent Transit Network New Frequent Service Current Frequent Service Dramatic Expansion in Accessibility (will remain under B-Link) The new network offers frequent service to 30% MORE PEOPLE across the region: note the new “spokes and rings” at right! Forget About Schedules A frequent network permits passengers to travel freely around the region without building their lives around rigid schedules.
    [Show full text]
  • MARC Train Time Schedule & Line Route
    MARC train time schedule & line map MARC Camden - Washington View In Website Mode The MARC train line (Camden - Washington) has 3 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Baltimore Camden: 6:32 AM - 7:45 PM (2) Dorsey: 3:30 PM (3) Washington: 5:00 AM - 6:15 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest MARC train station near you and ƒnd out when is the next MARC train arriving. Direction: Baltimore Camden MARC train Time Schedule 11 stops Baltimore Camden Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 6:32 AM - 7:45 PM Union Station 50 Massachusetts Avenue Ne, Washington Tuesday 6:32 AM - 7:45 PM Riverdale Wednesday 6:32 AM - 7:45 PM College Park Thursday 6:32 AM - 7:45 PM Friday 6:32 AM - 7:45 PM Greenbelt 5717 Greenbelt Metro Drive, Greenbelt Saturday Not Operational Muirkirk Laurel 22 Main Street, Laurel MARC train Info Direction: Baltimore Camden Savage Stops: 11 Dorsey Run Road, Maryland City Trip Duration: 71 min Line Summary: Union Station, Riverdale, College Jessup Park, Greenbelt, Muirkirk, Laurel, Savage, Jessup, 7996 Old Jessup Road, Jessup Dorsey, St. Denis, Camden Station Dorsey 7000 Rt 100, Elkridge St. Denis Railroad Avenue, Arbutus Camden Station Direction: Dorsey MARC train Time Schedule 8 stops Dorsey Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 3:30 PM Union Station 50 Massachusetts Avenue Ne, Washington Tuesday 3:30 PM Riverdale Wednesday 3:30 PM College Park Thursday 3:30 PM Friday 3:30 PM Greenbelt 5717 Greenbelt Metro Drive, Greenbelt Saturday Not Operational Muirkirk Laurel 22 Main Street, Laurel MARC train Info Direction: Dorsey Savage Stops: 8 Dorsey Run Road, Maryland City Trip Duration: 50 min Line Summary: Union Station, Riverdale, College Dorsey Park, Greenbelt, Muirkirk, Laurel, Savage, Dorsey 7000 Rt 100, Elkridge Direction: Washington MARC train Time Schedule 11 stops Washington Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 5:00 AM - 6:15 PM Camden Station Tuesday 5:00 AM - 6:15 PM St.
    [Show full text]
  • Baltimore Metro Area
    PHOTOS BY JUSTIN TSUCALAS, JASON VARNEY AND KEN STANEK FOR VISIT BALTIMORE VISIT FOR STANEK KEN AND VARNEY JASON TSUCALAS, JUSTIN BY PHOTOS Call 443.278.4701 443.278.4701 Call whole or in part is strictly prohibited. prohibited. strictly is part in or whole Available from 8 a.m. – 8:30 p.m., seven days a week a days seven p.m., 8:30 – a.m. 8 from Available consequences arising from errors or omissions. All rights reserved. Reproduction in in Reproduction reserved. rights All omissions. or errors from arising consequences Waterfront Partnership Guides Partnership Waterfront the accuracy of the information it publishes, but cannot be held responsible for any any for responsible held be cannot but publishes, it information the of accuracy the Visit Baltimore and Today Media Custom Communications make every effort to ensure ensure to effort every make Communications Custom Media Today and Baltimore Visit after hours. after Call 410.244.1030 during business hours, or 410.802.9631 410.802.9631 or hours, business during 410.244.1030 Call TodayMediaCustom.com Available from 10 a.m.– 10:30 p.m., seven days a week a days seven p.m., 10:30 a.m.– 10 from Available 410-828-0120 Downtown Partnership Guides Partnership Downtown Baltimore, MD 21211 21211 MD Baltimore, 1014 W. 36th Street Street 36th W. 1014 your Downtown, Inner Harbor or Harbor East destination. East Harbor or Harbor Inner Downtown, your Guides will meet you at your location and walk with you to to you with walk and location your at you meet will Guides Custom Communications Custom on foot and are the “eyes and ears” of the community.
    [Show full text]
  • Camden Line • for Your Safety, Passengers Must Be on the Proper Platform Prior to the Train’S Arrival
    MARC PASSENGER CODE OF CONDUCT Camden Line • For your safety, passengers must be on the proper platform prior to the train’s arrival. Passengers MARC TRAIN who cross in front of, or behind the train while it is at the station will be denied boarding. Effective June 1, 2021 • Please do not stand in the aisles when seats are available. Standing is never permitted on stairs or in vestibules. Conductors will direct standing passengers to seats when available. C • Passengers must have tickets out for inspection or collection by any authorized MARC representative. CharmPass users must have the app open and ticket activated when Conductors enter the car to Baltimore to check tickets. When directed by the Conductor, customers must tap the screen on their mobile device Washington DC to demonstrate the security features of the app. If the customer’s device is not working—including a Weekday Peak Service dead battery—or the customer refuses to tap the screen, the ticket is considered invalid and the customer must purchase a ticket from the Conductor. Tickets may be inspected more than Camden Station once during a trip. *TRANSFER FREE: one-way fare valid for 90 minutes across Local Bus, Light RailLink and Metro • The conductor is in charge of the train. Follow his or her instructions while riding any MARC train. SubwayLink service. Only available with Charmpass and Charmcard. St. Denis Please inform the conductor of any service problems you may experience or if you need assistance prior to arriving at your destination. Dorsey DOWNTOWN BALTIMORE RAIL CONNECTIONS • Improper fare, improper conduct, intoxication, or offensive actions will not be tolerated.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhode Island Avenue Great Streets Plan Existing Conditions Analysis
    Rhode Island Avenue Great Streets Plan Existing Conditions Analysis Submitted By: Green Door Advisors, LLC Partners for Economic Solutions PGN Architects Symmetra Design Collaborative Strategies Group December 8, 2008 FINAL Rhode Island Avenue Great Streets - Existing Conditions Analysis Rhode Island Avenue is a key gateway into the District of Columbia serving residents, businesses and commuters alike. The corridor, stretching between 4th Street NE to Eastern Avenue, NE covers a number of neighborhoods, including Eckington, Brentwood and Woodridge among others. The corridor encompasses a mix of single family residential, multifamily residential, public assets including a library and several faith organizations, as well as, a mix of low density commercial and retail uses. The following technical memo summarizes the existing land use, market and transportation conditions along the Rhode Island Avenue, NE corridor in Washington DC’s Ward 5 The memo is organized as follows: SECTION I – Land Use Analysis Page 3 SECTION II – Market Demographic Analysis Page 24 SECTION III – Residential Market Analysis Page 25 SECTION IV – Commercial Market Analysis Page 30 SECTION V – Transportation Analysis Page 37 In addition to this memo, an exhibit package is included providing detailed demographic and market analysis as an Appendix. 2 SECTION I – LAND USE • Study area consists of Rhode Island Ave NE from 3rd Street to Eastern Ave. • Broken down into four Sub Areas: 1. 4th to 12th, 2. 12th to 18th, 3. 18th to South Dakota and 4. South Dakota to Eastern Ave. • A mix of residential: single family detached and multifamily. Multifamily concentrated at 10th Street, Franklin and Newton Street NE.
    [Show full text]
  • FBI Headquarters DEIS Chapter 5
    5.0 Greenbelt Alternative Chapter 5 describes existing conditions of Figure 5- 1: Greenbelt Conceptual Site Plan the affected environment and identifies the environmental consequences associated with the Greenbelt Alternative. A detailed description of the WMATA methodologies employed to evaluate impacts for each MAINTENANCE resource and the relevant regulatory framework is YARD given in chapter 3, Methodology. The Greenbelt site consists of approximately 61 acres immediately adjacent to the Greenbelt Metro Station ¨¦§495 ¨¦§95 on Greenbelt Metro Drive in the City of Greenbelt, HOLLYWOOD Prince George’s County, Maryland, as shown in figure 5-1. It is bound on the north by Greenbelt Metro Drive and on the east by Cherrywood Lane. The southern and eastern boundaries are based on an option agreement signed with the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) and the A.H. Smith VISITOR CENTER MAIN GATE Development Company (AKA: Renard Development NORTH EMPLOYEE VEHICULAR GATE Company, LLC) in 2014. Greenbelt Road (MD 193) is NARRAGANSET PKWY VISITOR PARKING PARKING (EXIT ONLY) located less than 1 mile to the south, while the Capital EMPLOYEE GREENBELT METRO DR PARKING Beltway is near the northeast site boundary. The LACKAWANNA ST M Greenbelt Metro Station is located approximately 0.1 GREENBELT SUBSTATION METRO STANDBY mile from the western site boundary. Approximately STATION HQ BUILDING GENERATORS DEVELOPABLE half of the site is currently used by WMATA as a AREA CHERRYWOOD LN parking lot for the adjacent Greenbelt Metro Station. TRUCK PERIMETER SCREENING & FENCE The remainder of the site is an undeveloped riparian REMOTE DELIVERY forest associated with Indian Creek, which crosses the HOLLYWOOD FACILITY CENTRAL UTILITY site from northeast to southwest.
    [Show full text]
  • 81 College Park Line
    81 College Park Line Proposed Change • Route 81 runs on Sundays only. It is exactly like Route 83, but it serves Greenbelt Station instead of College Park Station. • This proposal would make Route 83 run on Sundays. The College Park Line would no longer serve Greenbelt Station on Sundays. • All service on the College Park Line would serve College Park Station seven days a week. Reason for the Change: • These will the make the College Park Line easier to understand. Service from Cherry Hill Campground will go to College Park Station seven days a week. Alternative Transportation Options: • Route C2 serves Greenbelt Station. It currently runs Monday through Saturday. We plan to add Sunday service to Route C2 to replace Route 81 service at Greenbelt Station. 81 College Park Line Cambio propuesto • El itinerario 81 funciona únicamente los domingos. Es exactamente igual al itinerario 83, pero presta servicio en Greenbelt Station en vez de College Park Station. • Esta propuesta implicaría que el itinerario 83 funcione los domingos. La Línea College Park no prestaría servicio en Greenbelt Station los domingos. • Todo el servicio de la Línea College Park prestaría servicio en College Park Station los siete días de la semana. Motivo del cambio: • Esto haría a la Línea College Park más fácil de entender. El servicio de Cherry Hill Campground irá a College Park Station los siete días de la semana. Opciones de transporte alternativas: • El itinerario C2 presta servicio en Greenbelt Station. Actualmente funciona de lunes a sábado. Planeamos agregar el servicio de los domingos al itinerario C2 para reemplazar al servicio del itinerario 81 en Greenbelt Station.
    [Show full text]
  • Priority Corridor Network Plan
    Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Priority Corridor Network Plan PRIORITY CORRIDOR NETWORK PLAN Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority PRIORITY CORRIDOR NETWORK PLAN Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority THE NEED FOR IMPROVED BUS SERVICES The Washington metropolitan area has Figure 1: Transit Modes Used Figure 2: Metrorail, Metrobus, and been growing steadily for the past 30 years Local Service Areas and is expected to continue to grow. Accord- ing to Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (MWCOG) estimates, jobs are expected to increase by 31 percent between 2008 and 2030, and population is expected to grow 26 percent over the same period. How- ever, the region is not growing uniformly. The outer suburbs are expected to grow much faster than the regional core, with dramatic increases in population and employment. The regional core and inner suburbs will still have the highest concentrations of jobs in 2030, but the inner and outer suburbs will have the ma- jority of the population. per year, and is expected to continue to grow Between 2000 and 2008, travel time by Me- as population and employment increase. This trobus has increased due to growing conges- The growth in population and employment growth has led to challenges for the Metrobus and the pattern of growth both are contribut- tion. For example, Route 52 on Fourteenth service. Not only has demand been increas- Street in Washington DC experienced nearly ing to increased vehicle travel. More people ing, but the added traffic congestion stem- are traveling longer distances to reach their a 14 percent increase in travel time, Route ming from regional growth has been increas- 29K on Little River Turnpike/Duke Street in places of employment and other destinations.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Management Plan
    Transportation Management Plan David B. Gleason, Flickr Creative Commons October 2, 2014 Prepared for: Washington Headquarters Services Prepared by: AECOM PENTAGON TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Project Background ......................................................................................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Study Area ........................................................................................................................................................................................1-2 1.3 Purpose of the Study....................................................................................................................................................................1-4 1.3.1 TMP Goals and Objectives ................................................................................................................................................1-4 1.4 Transportation Management Plan .........................................................................................................................................1-7 1.4.1 Pentagon TMP Development Team ...............................................................................................................................1-7 1.4.2 DoD Technical Advisors ......................................................................................................................................................1-7
    [Show full text]
  • Prince George's County Transit System Map Thebus
    5 2 E MANGUM RD N Prince George's County Transit V D C 201 A A P !( P T L B S E In1 set 1 L E T D 5 IL M N O A n n e A r u n d e l C o u n t y H US FedN eral Courthouse W S Y T E O N N L V E A R P A V G reenbelt SouthDern District R A T A R T S I A D 1 H G R DR " TheBus 5 O System Map C 3 R T A I E 5 M N ELT W B S EN GRE " E N T L T Greenbelt T R C P E K N N Y A T Metrorail Station D I R S 11 R L D A E U L G D J E ID O R V R O O A C W S D A IVY LN E E 15X G W N 11 16 P 2 D 5 E B E O V E H O A L T IVY L D D N I R O D RO 3 L R Q 5 N U S OI P H S R W ST N IN L G Y 1 H H ¤£ U D D RO IL T R N 1O 5X L CEN S O D ES T R N CR L 11 W B Y A R E K C R T R OD N E A E O L S P 197 W Y I H L E (! R N D B C R L L E I D E H T E C H M E L D G K T Y O R E N R K H I A N V P R A W M S P T H L N 16 Y A S S T K O E O P VI I R R O EW Muirkirk T N I N C L BREEZEWOOD CT N O F IR A R G C 95 T R H R W R MA MARC Station K E A P n¤ S D D L P L § I I P E ¨¦ N T L W L L N O T A C B N OD L E N E C B T E B T E N K O L L B T K N M T E BRE D A N A A EZ E E S I M o n t g o m e r y C o u n t y WOO M L K E E D DR H O N N A E E C R N I S O S L R T T H W I H S O W D G T M N D Y O E U C V T E R A L O N A D S T K R B I H T E E Y C A L F R V L A 1 495 E E Beltway Plaza E I ¤£ BR § R S A ¨¦ P NCHVILLE RD T O D D I R (!212 N R " T 5 193 R D 8 5 D 6 G R ! T 9 RE ( C 0 EN T H B R R E 201 A T LT H R D E P A H D !( K V A B A M L E V E E V E A A V E L E V T A H E 15X E W A V O V H G A D L A T N 7 I S H D R 193 5 N G 3 O REENB T N ELT RD N 6 ! ( 1 6 6 2 SEMINO H 5 U 6 LE ST W 16C Y RUATAN
    [Show full text]