DOCSLIB.ORG

Prince George's County Transit System Map Thebus

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Prince George's County Transit System Map Thebus 5 2 E MANGUM RD N Prince George's County Transit V D C 201 A A P !( P T L B S E In1 set 1 L E T D 5 IL M N O A n n e A r u n d e l C o u n t y H US FedN eral Courthouse W S Y T E O N N L V E A R P A V G reenbelt SouthDern District R A T A R T S I A D 1 H G R DR " TheBus 5 O System Map C 3 R T A I E 5 M N ELT W B S EN GRE " E N T L T Greenbelt T R C P E K N N Y A T Metrorail Station D I R S 11 R L D A E U L G D J E ID O R V R O O A C W S D A IVY LN E E 15X G W N 11 16 P 2 D 5 E B E O V E H O A L T IVY L D D N I R O D RO 3 L R Q 5 N U S OI P H S R W ST N IN L G Y 1 H H ¤£ U D D RO IL T R N 1O 5X L CEN S O D ES T R N CR L 11 W B Y A R E K C R T R OD N E A E O L S P 197 W Y I H L E (! R N D B C R L L E I D E H T E C H M E L D G K T Y O R E N R K H I A N V P R A W M S P T H L N 16 Y A S S T K O E O P VI I R R O EW Muirkirk T N I N C L BREEZEWOOD CT N O F IR A R G C 95 T R H R W R MA MARC Station K E A P n¤ S D D L P L § I I P E ¨¦ N T L W L L N O T A C B N OD L E N E C B T E B T E N K O L L B T K N M T E BRE D A N A A EZ E E S I M o n t g o m e r y C o u n t y WOO M L K E E D DR H O N N A E E C R N I S O S L R T T H W I H S O W D G T M N D Y O E U C V T E R A L O N A D S T K R B I H T E E Y C A L F R V L A 1 495 E E Beltway Plaza E I ¤£ BR § R S A ¨¦ P NCHVILLE RD T O D D I R (!212 N R " T 5 193 R D 8 5 D 6 G R ! T 9 RE ( C 0 EN T H B R R E 201 A T LT H R D E P A H D !( K V A B A M L E V E E V E A A V E L E V T A H E 15X E W A V O V H G A D L A T N 7 I S H D R 193 5 N G 3 O REENB T N ELT RD N 6 ! ( 1 6 6 2 SEMINO H 5 U 6 LE ST W 16C Y RUATAN ST TE C U 212 E M (! V S QU A E EBEC PL D H R P 3 L QUEBEC ST 6 (!201 IKEA ¨¦§495 Store (!197 L Inset 1 APO AK US Federal Courthouse LL L E O D P A e R v Southern District R L A K B Greenbelt A O " A 28 R R R N TLAKE DR e E A WES r " N W o A 11 15X 16 D D P A m 11 R i Y t O l 11 R a Bowie State 202 B n (!V L O Motor Vehicle Crescent Rd n¤ MARC Station d 26 E B o ZACH o ER Y ST R w R 17 y r r 16 A Administration e R h C D R D D 21 E Future Takoma Langley R L " IS Transit Center D L S Y O 11M NASA Goddard UTH a L L 15X 564 R A AK n E !( A S d Space Flight Center D O R VE a W A 16 R R T L n R " F D A RA F T 18 R G TO N R S N E d C S E DR 214 193 T O U ! " !( 16 15X T N ( T E 197 P C R " 11 (! O O O H G D M a L L C R P n A D A 26 k o i p L w v Doctor's Community C e r 214 y i L r a (! 1 Hospital n A R ¤£ o E V R J 18 R O 17 193 A Y D v® d !( AL G CE Largo Town Center TO R e R d T O N G v R D Prince George's College Park k N R D A c E u N L C R d Metrorail Station I Plaza o Seabrook N o N 2 14 17 G L D 3 R e L r MARC Station r n¤ A O d T o " I L Prince George's E P P 13 m A T A 14 18 i 15X E t C T l v 21 26 C C a e 28 N I G T West Hyattsville B R Good Luck Rd 450 C P Community CollOege 14 !( N E A I d L 14 K R T 12 13 e 495 P R P t L 13 a v O in n ¨¦§ t 0 A B A ran o B R R N c n h r m G East West Hwy E P a 410 k u E " 18 w O 14 L S !( Riverdale y b Y H A u L A R T g 13 A W e MARC Station T D B r S E U B N " Rive 16 O P N rdale R M E I l d 450 A NG e n¤ !( L C L p d T 12 a R T O 13 h Riverdale Rd is 21 N C R l S H R 14 iv o O D s erd p R d n al a A e d e nn 495 21 N e R H 21X u 14 A ¨¦§ R R S Q 13 W R d T 1 8 Y 15X Y " 17 S R DR D 16 T D 12 Ch A ill n R E um li 26 L A T l S Rd 201 E U E (! P N M d M O R T H 12 13 New Carrollton Inset 2 A X (!202 " 21 E d N A R h t el e orporate F v nd 8 15X 16 21 21X C (/50 D I u 3 r A A Dr L R Largo A 21X H Ar 12 dwic 450 k A !( rdm Rd ore 18 y 17 s n Landover n e 12 r P " D Prince George's h t H 21 27 5 e ubba Hospital Center v® 7 v rd A 27 21X d T R L C d R A I t ST T a E er Rd EL R ov e Inset 3 27 and C A L s Woodmore t N h R g A i r Towne Centre IL B 22 AVE 202 " D LESS !( R EER C P L a P 21 Upper MarlbE oro m LE N BLVD R p OGERS NO o "JOHN R R u E r OV 28 t s G h W County Detention Cheverly Colum Prince George's a bia y E Park Rd Sports and Learning Center V " A 18 C T 18 23 Complex 21 L L C S a I D r R N S k R 23 g I R L E E 22 c o 28 E E i E IC A K D L I eriff Rd R K O R N P Sh m KING JOHN WAY E H R G L O T C r d R H N S O O E o L Y County 193 C B K r A L E L N 202R E R C !( N L R O C A W " D T D c 22 L !( P M L 53 O C O H 53 U Largo Town Ctr C M A 21X O d R B f R Administration N f H ri U B I She 21 R A A T E Y R y R Morgan Blvd 21 236 R I 28 C w 23 P Building H D H r B L J R S DEP g O P OT L n 22 234 236 N i W M K N 28 N A r R a 21 d H 53 Y e S 20 51 l 23 h l T R t e 22 21 Motor Vehicle D A H W u y G L T OU I R H n O LBO T ti " Administration AR S r N M N N I I a R A M A W a s h i n g t o n , D C M D 214 R !( C " OL D MA l O l R Capitol Heights A i 23 L 236 BO L T d m 236 R D S d r O r " l i e M T Y s l P d i 20 D I o p K T A I R E L R H n p CH D A C H RAN L " W E 234 B 235 e RING V SP R Y R R D " P 22 R 21X P R d D 214 21 ST E Y LN L " RECTOR LM 234 Central Ave !( E T S S Y 235 495 IN S"T A R 236 ¨¦§ M CH R R D H " 23 H 236 HU S 234 LN 53 C E C a L Addison Road Prince George's SCHOO DG 235 m JU p Community College D R L t o R e o v Inset 2 a 21 l n H T l r S A K i g H n 18 20 23 a n o C d R C r s r e r HU A R y C h A t W AVE R IA u v NSYLVAN o d n S PEN e A T v S l o .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Town of Leesburg
    DRAFT LOUDOUN COUNTY Transit Management Analysis Report Prepared for: Prepared by: October 2013 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................3 Background ..............................................................................................................................................................................................3 Study Purpose .......................................................................................................................................................................................3 2. Institutional Stakeholders and Existing Funding .....................................................................4 Loudoun County .................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Town of Leesburg .............................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Northern Virginia Transportation Authority (NVTA) .................................................................................................. 4 Northern Virginia Transportation Commission (NVTC) ........................................................................................... 4 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) ...............................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Metrorail/Coconut Grove Connection Study Phase II Technical
    METRORAILICOCONUT GROVE CONNECTION STUDY DRAFT BACKGROUND RESEARCH Technical Memorandum Number 2 & TECHNICAL DATA DEVELOPMENT Technical Memorandum Number 3 Prepared for Prepared by IIStB Reynolds, Smith and Hills, Inc. 6161 Blue Lagoon Drive, Suite 200 Miami, Florida 33126 December 2004 METRORAIUCOCONUT GROVE CONNECTION STUDY DRAFT BACKGROUND RESEARCH Technical Memorandum Number 2 Prepared for Prepared by BS'R Reynolds, Smith and Hills, Inc. 6161 Blue Lagoon Drive, Suite 200 Miami, Florida 33126 December 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 2.0 STUDY DESCRiPTION ........................................................................................ 1 3.0 TRANSIT MODES DESCRIPTION ...................................................................... 4 3.1 ENHANCED BUS SERViCES ................................................................... 4 3.2 BUS RAPID TRANSIT .............................................................................. 5 3.3 TROLLEY BUS SERVICES ...................................................................... 6 3.4 SUSPENDED/CABLEWAY TRANSIT ...................................................... 7 3.5 AUTOMATED GUIDEWAY TRANSiT ....................................................... 7 3.6 LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT .............................................................................. 8 3.7 HEAVY RAIL ............................................................................................. 8 3.8 MONORAIL
    [Show full text]
  • Process for Congestion Relief Link and Project Priority Ranking for CIS FY 1322
    Process for Congestion Relief Link and Project Priority Ranking for CIS FY 1322 Congestion Management System (CMS) congestion link priority rankings were developed for all the links in the CMS. These link rankings serve two purposes. First is to rank the links so that priority can be established by location so that the highest priority congested locations can be identified. Second, for highway projects that have already been identified, they can be prioritized for congestion. The link rankings were developed using scores from “0” to “10” for each measure and the weighted by the percent for each measure to obtain a 100% score. A score of “10” was given for the highest priority values for each given measure used. The Congestion Relief priority rankings are primarily based on congestion performance measures, with consideration also given to related roadway usage characteristics. Congestion performance measures include volume to capacity (V/C) ratios and delays. Roadway usage characteristics include AADT traffic volumes, function class and strategic network. The congestion performance measures comprise 70% of the ranking while the roadway usage characteristics comprise the remaining 30%. As V/C ratios have been the most common performance measure used for congestion priority rankings, the V/C ratio scores were given 40% of the overall weight for the overall score, split evenly between AM and PM V/C ratios. The highest one‐way AM V/C was given 20% of the overall weight, while the highest one‐way PM V/C was also given 20% of the overall weight. Delays were given 30% of the overall weight, split by two types of delays.
    [Show full text]
  • __History of Kew Depot and It's Routes
    HISTORY OF KEW DEPOT AND ITS ROUTES Page 1 HISTORY of KEW DEPOT and the ROUTES OPERATED by KEW Compiled and written by Hugh Waldron MCILT CA 1500 The word tram and tramway are derived from Scottish words indicating the type of truck and the tracks used in coal mines. 1807 The first Horse tram service in the world commences operation between Swansea and Mumbles in Wales. 12th September 1854 At 12.20 pm first train departs Flinders Street Station for Sandridge (Port Melbourne) First Steam operated railway line in Australia. The line is eventually converted to tram operation during December 1987 between the current Southbank Depot and Port Melbourne. The first rail lines in Australia operated in Newcastle Collieries operated by horses in 1829. Then a five-mile line on the Tasman Peninsula opened in 1836 and powered by convicts pushing the rail vehicle. The next line to open was on 18/5/1854 in South Australia (Goolwa) and operated by horses. 1864 Leonard John Flannagan was born in Richmond. After graduating he became an Architect and was responsible for being the Architect building Malvern Depot 1910, Kew Depot 1915 and Hawthorn Depot 1916. He died 2nd November 1945. September 1873 First cable tramway in the world opens in Clay Street, San Francisco, USA. 1877 Steam tramways commence. Victoria only had two steam tramways both opened 1890 between Sorrento Pier to Sorrento Back Beach closed on 20th March 1921 (This line also operated horse trams when passenger demand was not high.) and Bendigo to Eaglehawk converted to electric trams in 1903.
    [Show full text]
  • For the Record SOUTHERN STATES COOP
    The following is a list of MDE’s JOHNFor W. RITTER TRUCKING, the INC. - 8271 DAYSRecord COVE RUBBLE LANDFILL - DAVID YINGLING PROPERTY - 2300 Brock Bridge Road, Laurel, MD 20724. (98- HORIZONTAL EXPANSION - 6425 Days Hughes Shop, Westminster, MD 21158. permiting activity from OPT-6467) Oil operations permit for above Cove Road, White Marsh, MD 21162. Sewage sludge application on agricultural land February 15 - March 15, 1998 ground storage tank and transportation (98DP3261) Surface industrial discharge permit KENNETH FORD - 2867 Bird View Road, MARYLAND CITY WATER GAMSE LITHOGRAPHING COMPANY, INC. Westminster, MD 21157. Sewage sludge For more information RECLAMATION FACILITY - 462 Brock - 7413 Pulaski Highway, Baltimore, MD application on agricultural land on any of these permits, Bridge Road, Laurel, MD 20724. Sewage sludge 21237-2529. (TR 4626) Received an air LOIS G. PAULSON - 322 Klee Mill Road, application on agricultural land permit to construct for two printing presses Sykesville, MD 21784. Sewage sludge please call our PASADENA YACHT CLUB - 8631 Fort MARYLAND TRANSPORTATION AU- application on agricultural land Environmental Permits Smallwood Road, Pasadena, MD 21122. (TR THORITY - Reservoir Road and Peninsula MELVIN BLIZZARD - 1246 Deer Park Road, 4639) Received an air permit to construct for Expressway, Baltimore, MD 21219. (TR 4640) Westminster, MD 21157. Sewage sludge Service Center at one 4,000 gallon underground storage tank Received an air permit to construct for one application on agricultural land (410) 631-3772. PATUXENT WATER RECLAMATION groundwater remediation PRESTON GREEN, CA-17 - 3300 Sams Creek FACILITY - Cronson Boulevard, Crofton, MD MARYLAND STATE DEPARTMENT OF Road, New Windsor, MD 21776. Sewage sludge 21114. Sewage sludge application on agricul- GENERAL SERVICES - 3O1 W.
    [Show full text]
  • Countywide Bus Rapid Transit Study Consultant’S Report (Final) July 2011
    Barrier system (from TOA) Countywide Bus Rapid Transit Study Consultant’s Report (Final) July 2011 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION COUNTYWIDE BUS RAPID TRANSIT STUDY Consultant’s Report (Final) July 2011 Countywide Bus Rapid Transit Study Table of Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. ES-1 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key additional elements of BRT network ...................................................................... 2 1.1.1 Relationship to land use ........................................................................................ 2 1.1.2 Station access ...................................................................................................... 3 1.1.3 Brand identity ........................................................................................................ 4 1.2 Organization of report .................................................................................................. 5 1.3 Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................ 5 2 Study Methodology ............................................................................................................. 7 2.1 High-level roadway screening ...................................................................................... 9 2.2 Corridor development and initial
    [Show full text]
  • Resolution #20-9
    BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION BALTIMORE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION BOARD RESOLUTION #20-9 RESOLUTION TO ENDORSE THE UPDATED BALTIMORE REGION COORDINATED PUBLIC TRANSIT – HUMAN SERVICES TRANSPORTATION PLAN WHEREAS, the Baltimore Regional Transportation Board (BRTB) is the designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the Baltimore region, encompassing the Baltimore Urbanized Area, and includes official representatives of the cities of Annapolis and Baltimore; the counties of Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Carroll, Harford, Howard, and Queen Anne’s; and representatives of the Maryland Departments of Transportation, the Environment, Planning, the Maryland Transit Administration, Harford Transit; and WHEREAS, the Baltimore Regional Transportation Board as the Metropolitan Planning Organization for the Baltimore region, has responsibility under the provisions of the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act for developing and carrying out a continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive transportation planning process for the metropolitan area; and WHEREAS, the Federal Transit Administration, a modal division of the U.S. Department of Transportation, requires under FAST Act the establishment of a locally developed, coordinated public transit-human services transportation plan. Previously, under MAP-21, legislation combined the New Freedom Program and the Elderly Individuals and Individuals with Disabilities Program into a new Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program, better known as Section 5310. Guidance on the new program was provided in Federal Transit Administration Circular 9070.1G released on June 6, 2014; and WHEREAS, the Federal Transit Administration requires a plan to be developed and periodically updated by a process that includes representatives of public, private, and nonprofit transportation and human services providers and participation by the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Maintenance Surface Treatment (MST) Paving Program, April 13, 2010
    Maine State Library Digital Maine Transportation Documents Transportation 4-13-2010 MaineDOT Region 2 : Maintenance Surface Treatment (MST) Paving Program, April 13, 2010 Maine Department of Transportation Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalmaine.com/mdot_docs Recommended Citation Maine Department of Transportation, "MaineDOT Region 2 : Maintenance Surface Treatment (MST) Paving Program, April 13, 2010" (2010). Transportation Documents. 1381. https://digitalmaine.com/mdot_docs/1381 This Text is brought to you for free and open access by the Transportation at Digital Maine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Transportation Documents by an authorized administrator of Digital Maine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MaineDOT 2010 Maintenance Surface Treatment (MST) Paving Program MaineDOT Map ID Municipalities Anticipated Road Segment Description Miles Region # Affected 2010 Dates Route 105 - from the southerly junction of Routes 131 and 105, 2 21 Appleton, Hope 11.34 8/2 - 10/1 extending southerly to the Camden/Hope town line Route 100 - from 1.84 miles east of the Benton/Fairfield town line to 2 17 Benton 2.95 9/8 - 9/21 0.47 mile westerly of the Benton/Clinton town line Turner/Biscay Road - from the junction with Biscay Road, Bremen 2 16 Bremen 3.04 8/2 - 10/1 to the junction with Route 32, Bremen Route 139 - from the intersection of Route 137/7 in Brooks, 2 114 Brooks, Knox 8.78 6/28 - 8/13 extending northerly to the junction of Routes 139 and 220 Weeks Mills Road - from the intersection of
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Planned Transit Service Improvements
    Metro Transit Central-South (Sector 5) Final Plan 4.5 Public Outreach Conclusions Stakeholder and public comments provided guidance to improve various elements of the plan. About one fifth of the comments favored the plan. Four cities, one county and the University of Minnesota also supported the plan. Several neighborhood groups expressed concerns about specific elements of the plan. The majority of comments (over 60 percent) were in response to the proposed route elimination or service reductions on Routes 7, 8, 18, 19, 22, 52B, 84, 538 and 539. Another frequent comment was concern regarding increased transfers and loss of direct service to key destinations. For example, the proposed elimination of some direct service to the University of Minnesota was the source of many complaints. The Concept Plan was modified to address many of the stakeholder and customer concerns within the current operating budget and the tenants identified in the previous chapters. Of the 55 routes in the sector, 32 or 58 percent of routes were modified in response to public comment. The final plan preserves geographic coverage in all of the urban area, and most of the suburban areas, and direct service to the University of Minnesota from France Avenue/ W. 50th Street, Cedar Avenue/Portland Avenue and Snelling Avenue. This final plan, as modified to address the concerns raised during the public outreach phase, is supported by all five cities and the two counties found in the study area. 5 Planned Transit Service Improvements 5.1 Planned Transit Service Network The service improvement program begins with a high-to-medium frequency grid network of local service in high-density population and employment areas such as south Minneapolis and St.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 1: Downtown Transit Center and Circulator Shuttle
    Howard Research and Development Corporation Downtown Columbia Downtown Transit Center and Circulator Shuttle Feasibility Study: Part 1 - Downtown Transit Center & Downtown Circulator Shuttle (Part of CEPPA #5) DRAFTDecember 2011 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................. iv Chapter 1. Downtown Columbia Transit Center ....................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2. Downtown Columbia Circulator Shuttle ............................................................................................... 12 Appendix A. Regional Transit System Evaluation .............................................................................................. 21 Appendix B. Regional Transit Market Analysis .................................................................................................. 46 Appendix C. Transit Circulator Design ................................................................................................................ 64 Appendix D. Transit Center Site Evaluation ...................................................................................................... 764 Appendix E. Transit Development Plan ............................................................................................................... 79 DRAFT Page i• Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. Table of Figures Figure 1 Existing
    [Show full text]
  • The Bulletin STATEN ISLAND’S 157-YEAR-OLD RAILROAD
    ERA BULLETIN — SEPTEMBER, 2017 The Bulletin Electric Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated Vol. 60, No. 9 September, 2017 The Bulletin STATEN ISLAND’S 157-YEAR-OLD RAILROAD Published by the Electric (Continued from August, 2017 issue) Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated, PO Box Before the end of 1925, the railroad was Buses adjacent to the railroad appeared in 3323, New York, New able to operate full electric service from St. the 1920s, but the railroad still made a profit. York 10163-3323. George to Tottenville, South Beach, and Ar- Several years later, railroad riding declined lington with 100 new M.U. electric cars. The because of competition from the buses. For general inquiries, or fleet was composed of 90 motor cars num- When the Isle Transportation Company sur- Bulletin submissions, bered 300-389 and ten trailers numbered rendered its franchise on February 23, 1947, contact us at bulletin@ erausa.org. ERA’s 500-509, of which five were eventually con- the Board of Transportation started operating website is verted to motors. Freight was also carried on the buses immediately, retaining the five-cent www.erausa.org. nearly the entire line, including the non- fare with several five-cent zones depending electrified track extending from Arlington on the distance. On July 1, 1948, bus fares Editorial Staff: across the bridge to Cranford Junction, New were increased to seven cents, zone fares Editor-in-Chief: Bernard Linder Jersey. Because the passenger service usu- were abolished, and passengers could buy a Tri-State News and ally operated at a deficit, the company was 2-cent transfer valid on subway lines at Commuter Rail Editor: unable to spend $17 million to extend the South Ferry, Manhattan.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Long Range Transportation Plan Cumberland Area
    Prepared for: Cumberland Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Prepared by: with Crossroads Transportation Financial Assistance Provided By: February 26, 2016 MPO Adopted: March 24, 2016 Federal Concurrence: Table of Contents Chapter 1: The Process, Purpose, and the Plan ..................................................................................................................... 1‐2 1.1 What is Transportation Planning? ....................................................................................................................................... 1‐2 1.2 What Is the Role of an MPO in Regional Transportation Planning? .................................................................................... 1‐2 1.3 Why are MPOs required? .................................................................................................................................................... 1‐3 1.4 What is the Cumberland Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO)? ................................................................. 1‐4 1.5 Where is the CAMPO Region? ............................................................................................................................................. 1‐4 1.6 What is CAMPO’s Organizational Structure? ...................................................................................................................... 1‐6 1.7 What is Plan 2040? .............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]