Complete Issue
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Säädk 40/2017
SUOMEN SÄÄDÖSKOKOELMA MuuMnrovvvvSuomen asia presidentit vuoden 2017 juhlarahoista Julkaistu Helsingissä 25 päivänä tammikuuta 2017 40/2017 Valtiovarainministeriön asetus Suomen presidentit vuoden 2017 juhlarahoista Valtiovarainministeriön päätöksen mukaisesti säädetään metallirahasta annetun lain (216/1998) 1 §:n 2 momentin nojalla, sellaisena kuin se on laissa 378/2002: 1§ Vuonna 2017 julkaistaan Suomen presidentit -aiheiset 5 euron juhlarahat aiheinaan Ris- to Heikki Ryti, Carl Gustaf Emil Mannerheim, Juho Kusti Paasikivi ja Urho Kaleva Kek- konen. 2§ Juhlarahojen keskusta on kuparinikkeliä, jonka painosta 75 % on kuparia ja 25% nik- keliä. Rengas on alumiinipronssia, jonka painosta on kuparia 92 %, alumiinia 6% ja nik- keliä 2 %. Pitoisuudet saavat vaihdella enintään ± 10 promilleyksikköä. 3§ Jokaisen juhlarahan halkaisija on 27,25 ± 0,1 millimetriä ja paino 9,8 ± 0,4 grammaa. Enintään 5 prosenttia rahoista saa poiketa halkaisijastaan enemmän kuin ± 0,1 millimet- riä. 4§ Juhlarahojen kuvat ja kirjoitukset laakapinnoilla on sijoitettu siten, että rahoja kirjan lehden tavoin käännettäessä kumpikin puoli on oikein päin. Rahojen arvopuolella on ne suunnitelleen taiteilijan sukunimen alkukirjain L sekä Suo- men Rahapaja Oy:n tunnus. 5§ Suomen presidentit -juhlarahoilla on yhteinen arvopuoli, joka on seuraavan selitelmän ja kuvan mukainen. Rahojen arvopuolen taustana on suomalainen peltomaisema. Maiseman keskellä on avattu kirja, jonka lehdillä on kuvattu urbaani, rakennettu ympäristö teollisuuslaitoksineen ja taloineen. Teksti SUOMI on rahan kehällä vasemmalla, teksti FINLAND rahan kehällä keskellä ylhäällä ja vuosiluku 2017 rahan kehällä oikealla. Arvomerkintä 5 EURO on ra- han kehällä keskellä alhaalla. 1 40/2017 6§ Suomen presidentit — Risto Heikki Ryti -juhlarahan tunnuspuoli on seuraavan selitel- män ja kuvan mukainen. Rahan tunnuspuolella on Risto Heikki Rytin oikealle katsova muotokuva. -
4.Murtomäki 2017.10192 Words
Sibelius in the Context of the Finnish-German History Veijo Murtomäki Introduction The life and career of a composer cannot be considered as an isolated case without taking into account the wider context. The history of ideas and ideologies is always part of any serious enquiry into an artist’s personal history. Therefore we must bear in mind at least four points when considering the actions of artist and his or her country. Firstly, as the eminent Finnish historian Matti Klinge has observed, "the biggest challenge for understanding history is trying to situate oneself in the preconditions of the time-period under scrutiny while remembering that it did not know what the posterity knows."[1] Writing history is not primarily a task whereby the historian provides lines for actors to speak, but rather is an attempt to understand and explain why something happened, and to construct a context including all of the possible factors involved in a certain historical process. Secondly, supporting (or not opposing) an ideology prevailing at a certain time does not mean that the supporter (or non-opponent) is committing a crime. We could easily condemn half of the European intellectuals for supporting Fascism, Nazism, Communism or Maoism, or just for having become too easily attracted by these – in their mind – fascinating, visionary ideologies to shape European or world history. Thirdly, history has always been written by the winners – and thus, historiography tends to be distorted by exaggerating the evil of the enemy and the goodness of the victor. A moral verdict must be reached when we are dealing with absolute evil, but it is rare to find exclusively good or bad persons or civilizations; therefore history is rarely an issue of black and white. -
Peace Treaty Between the Republic of Finland and the Russian Socialist Federal Soviet Republic, Signed at Dorpat, October 14, 1920
PEACE TREATY BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF FINLAND AND THE RUSSIAN SOCIALIST FEDERAL SOVIET REPUBLIC, SIGNED AT DORPAT, OCTOBER 14, 1920 Whereas Finland declared its independence in 1917, and Russia has recognised the independence and the sovereignty of Finland within the frontiers of the Grand Duchy of Finland, The Government of the Republic of Finland, and the Government of the Federal Socialist Republic of Soviet Russia, Actuated by a desire to put an end to the war which has since arisen between their States, to establish mutual and lasting peace relations, and to confirm the situation which springs from the ancient political union of Finland and Russia, Have resolved to conclude a Treaty with this object in view, and have selected as their representatives for this purpose, the following: For the Government of the Republic of Finland: M. JUHO KUSTI PAASIKIVI, M. JUHO HEIKKI VENNOLA, M. ALEXANDER FREY, M. KARL RUDOLF WALDEN, M. VÄINÖ TANNER, M. VÄINÖ VOIONMAA, M. VÄINÖ GABRIEL KIVILINNA. For the Federal Socialist Republic of Soviet Russia: M. JEAN ANTONOVITCH BERZINE, M. PLATON MIKHAJLOVITCH KERGENTSEFF, M. NICOLAS SERGUEJEVITCH TIKHMENEFF. Who, after meeting at the town of Dorpat and exchanging their full powers, found in good and due form, have agreed to the following provisions: Article 1. From the date upon which this Treaty shall come into force, a state of war shall cease to exist between the Contracting Powers, and the two Powers shall mutually undertake to maintain, for the future, an attitude of peace and goodwill towards one another. Article 2. The frontier between the States of Russia and of Finland shall be as follows: 1. -
Public Opinion, Journalism and the Question Offinland's Membership Of
10.1515/nor-2017-0211 Nordicom Review 28 (2007) 2, pp. 81-92 Public Opinion, Journalism and the Question of Finland’s Membership of NATO JUHO RAHKONEN Abstract The big question behind the research on media and democracy is: do media influence public opinion and the actual policy? The discussion about Finland’s NATO membership is a case in point. Since the collapse of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War, there has been a continuous public debate about whether Finland should join NATO. In the last 16 years, however, public opinion on NATO membership has not changed much. Despite the changes in world politics, such as NATO enlargement and new weapons technology, Finns still rely on military non-alliance and want to keep their own army strong. During the last ten years, there seems to be no correlation between media coverage and public opinion: pro-NATO media content has not been able to make Finns’ attitudes towards NATO more positive. The information provided by most of the Finnish newspapers is different from the way ordinary people see NATO. In the papers’ view, joining the alli- ance would be a natural step in Finland’s integration into Western democratic organiza- tions. Ordinary people on the contrary consider NATO more as a (U.S. led) military alli- ance which is not something Finland should be a part of. Historical experiences also dis- courage military alignment. In the light of data drawn from newspaper articles and opin- ion polls, the article suggests that journalism has had only a slight effect on public opin- ion about Finland’s NATO membership. -
ISSP Background Variable Documentation
FinlandFinland 2008 ISSP 2 Please name the ISSP module which the documentation refers to (e.g., “Work Orientations III / ISSP2005”): Religion III / ISSP 2008 Please name your country: Finland SEX - Sex of respondent National Language English Translation Question no. 1. Oletteko: 1.Are You: and text Codes/ 1. Mies 1. Male Categories 2. Nainen 2. Female Interviewer Instruction Translation Note Note Finland SEX - Sex of respondent National Language English Translation Question no. 1. Är Ni: 1. Are You: and text Codes/ 1. Man 1. Male Categories 2. Kvinna 2. Female Interviewer Instruction 2008 Translation Note Note Construction/Recoding: ISSPCountry Variable Codes (in translation) Î SEX 1. Male 1. Male 2. Female 2. Female - not used - 9. No answer, refused Documentation for ISSP background variables © GESIS 3 AGE - Age of respondent National Language English Translation Question no. 2. Minä vuonna olette syntynyt? 2 Year of birth? and text Codes/ Categories Interviewer Instruction Translation Note Note AGE - Age of respondent National Language English Translation Question no. 2. Vilket år är Ni fàdd? 2 Year of birth? and text Codes/ Categories Interviewer Instruction Translation Note Finland Note Construction/Recoding: (list lowest, highest, and ‘missing’ codes only, replace terms in [square brackets] with real numbers) Country Variable Codes/Construction Rules ÎAGE Construction Codes 1993 2008 [15] 1934 [74] - not used - 99. No answer, refused Optional: Recoding Syntax AGE = 2008 – k2. ISSP Documentation for ISSP background variables © GESIS 4 MARITAL - R: Marital status National Language English Translation Question no. 3. Oletteko tällä hetkellä: 3. At the moment, are You and text Ympyröikää vain yksi vaihtoehto. -
RUSSO-FINNISH RELATIONS, 1937-1947 a Thesis Presented To
RUSSO-FINNISH RELATIONS, 1937-1947 A Thesis Presented to the Department of History Carroll College In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Academic Honors with a B.A. Degree In History by Rex Allen Martin April 2, 1973 SIGNATURE PAGE This thesis for honors recognition has been approved for the Department of History. II ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to acknowledge thankfully A. Patanen, Attach^ to the Embassy of Finland, and Mrs. Anna-Malja Kurlkka of the Library of Parliament in Helsinki for their aid in locating the documents used In my research. For his aid In obtaining research material, I wish to thank Mr. H. Palmer of the Inter-Library Loan Department of Carroll College. To Mr. Lang and to Dr. Semmens, my thanks for their time and effort. To Father William Greytak, without whose encouragement, guidance, and suggestions this thesis would never have been completed, I express my warmest thanks. Rex A. Martin 111 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... v I. 1937 TO 1939 ........................................................................................ 1 II. 1939 TO1 940.................................................... 31 III. 1940 TO1 941............................................................................................. 49 IV. 1941 TO1 944 ......................................................................................... 70 V. 1944 TO 1947 ........................................................................................ -
The Managerial Cube
ARTIKKELIT• RAIMO NURMI 269 The managerial cube Raimo Nurmi tinuum (see e.g. Nurmi, 1994, for another con ABSTRACT ceptualization of the relation between the two concepts). Many management textbooks argue that top The article introduces a manageria! cube thai management is in charge of the strategy and it consists of three continua: The first is management delegates the operations to the middle manage vs. leadership, the second strategic vs. op�rative, the third responsibility vs. power. The Pres1dents of ment and operative personnel. ln fact, top man Finland are reviewed and classified by means of the agement tends to be loaded with much opera cube. Admittedly, the interpretations remain tive routine (Mintzberg, 1973), and, strategies debatable. Nonetheless, it is argued thai the cube often emerge from middle management or even has potential for further conceptual refi�ement, empirical measurement and use as an mstrument for from the operative personnel (Viitanen, 1993). AII management development. manageria! tasks have, accordingly, strategic and operative qualities. Strategic qualities purport making the organization fit with its environment, and they include managing and leading chang Key words: Management, leadership, strategy, operations, responsibility, power. es, transitions and transformations. Operative qualities mean to implement the given strategy - or, in fact, sometimes even working without a strategy. ln this article, the two concepts are seen to make up a continuum. 1. INTRODUCTION Responsibility vs. power is regarded in this article as the third manageria! continuum. Re Management and leadership are established sponsibility refers to manageria! behaviour to concepts in literature. Management as a "coun maintain or improve the position of the organiza terpoint" of leadership refers to manageria! work tion even at the cost of the manager - the cost process: e.g., the functions of management (like may be stress, unpleasant decisions, bad pub planning, coordinating, controlling, etc.) have licity and other persona! problems. -
Jui:>GMENT of P. -B. Sawantr, S. RATNAVAEL PANDIAN, J]
\^OUJMli 1] THE SUPREKAi: COURT JUDGhAENT 06-rj-1992) JUi:>GMENT OF P. -B. SAWANTr, S. RATNAVAEL PANDIAN, J] Judgment of 9-]iidge Constitution Bench of The Supreme Court of India delivered on 16-11-1992 regarding reservations in service for Sociali}/ & Edncatio?mll}/ Backward Classes and Other Economically Backward Sections, etc. IN TOE SUPREME COURT OF ]ND] A CIVIL ORIGINA L JURISDICTION Wiit Petition (Civil) No.930 of 1990 hidra Sawhney Etc. Etc. ... Petitioners Vei'sus Union of India &Ors. Etc. Etc. ,Resj7ondents w m i Writ Petition (Civil) Nos. 948, 949, 953, 954, 965, 966, 971, 972, 974, 986, 987, 1053, 1061, 1064, 1069, 1071, 1077, 1079, 1081, 1087, 1101, 1102, 1105, 1106, 1112, 1114, 1115, 1116, 1117, 1119, 1120, 1123, 1124, 1126, U28, 1130, 1141, 1148, 1158, 1276, 1307,1362, Of 1990 Writ Petition (Civil) Nos. 3, 36, 97, 343, 1094 0/1991 Writ Petition (Civil) Nos. 11, 111, 261, Of 1992 • AND Transfer Case (civil) Nos. 27, 28-31, 32-33, 34-35, 65 Of 1990, 1 Of 1991 JUDGMENT SAWANTJ. that everything is at large and the Court is not inhibited in its approach and conclusions by the precedents, the In a legal system where the Courts are vested view taken so far on certain facets of the subject, may be with the power of judicial review, on occasions issues hard to disregard on the principle of stare decisis. This with social, political and economic overtones come up will be more so where certain sitxiations have crystal for consideration. They are commonly known as poliH- lised and have become a part of the social psyche over a cal questions. -
Seinäjoen Kokoomus • Sata Vuotta • 1919-2019
S E I N Ä J O E N KO KO O M U S SATA VUOTTA • 1919-2019 1919 S E I N Ä J O E N 2019 SEINÄJOEN KOKOOMUS • SATA VUOTTA • 1919-2019 Hyvä ystävä! Seinäjoen Kokoomus ry:llä on vuonna yritteliäisyys antaa mahdollisuudet 2019 tärkeä juhlavuosi: täytämme kehittää hyvinvointiamme. kunniakkaat 100 vuotta. Juhlistamme sitä juhlan ja kädessäsi olevan historiikin Haluan kiittää juhlan hetkellä lämpimästi merkeissä. Sataan vuoteen mahtuu lähes kaikkia Seinäjoen Kokoomuksessa koko itsenäisen Suomen historia ja taival. t o i m i v i a j a t o i m i n e i t a a k t i i v e j a . Vaikeuksien kautta on luotu hyvinvoin- Panoksenne yhteisten asioiden hoidossa tiyhteiskunta, jossa on moni asia hyvin. Se on ollut äärettömän tärkeää. Myöskään on vaatinut paitsi taistelua itsenäisyydestä ilman hyviä yhteistyökumppaneita, kuten myös paljon työtä ja viisaita päätöksiä, Seinäjoen kaupunkia, yhdistys ei voi joita on tehty yhdessä Suomea rakentaen. menestyä – teille myös kiitos. Erityisesti Kokoomus on ollut aina vastuullinen, h a l u a n v i e l ä k i i t t ä ä S e i n ä j o e n yksilöä kunnioittava arvopuolue, joka on Kokoomuksen kunniapuheenjohtajaa ja toiminut koko yhteiskunnan hyväksi niin juhlatoimikunnan puheenjohtaja Matti valtakunnallisesti, alueellisesti kuin Kuvajaa 100-vuotisjuhlamme valmistelun paikallisestikin. koordinoinnista ja historiikin kokoamises- ta. Seinäjoen Kokoomus on jäsenmäärältään suurin Pohjanmaan maakuntien alueella Vastuu alkaa siitä, että välittää. Tämän toimivista Kokoomuksen jäsenyhdistyk- Kokoomuksen taannoisen vaalisloganin sistä. Tänä päivänä jäseniä on noin 130. olen kokenut itselleni läheiseksi. Sen Yhdistys toimii aktiivisesti Kokoomuksen voimin jatketaan kohti satavuotiskautta Seinäjoen kunnallisjärjestössä yhteistyös- sopivasti uudistuen, hyviä perinteitä sä muiden paikallisten kokoomusyhdis- hylkäämättä. -
Introduction
Notes Introduction 1This study uses ‘Estonian Veterans’ League’ as the most practical translation of the Eesti Vabadussõjalaste Liit (‘Veterans’ League of the Estonian War of Independence’). The popular term for a Veterans’ League member was vaps (plural: vapsid), or vabs, derived from vabadussõjalane (‘War of Independence veteran’). This often appears mistakenly capitalized as VAPS. A term for the Veterans frequently found in historical literature is ‘Freedom Fighters’, the direct translation of the German Freiheitskämpfer. Another unsatisfactory translation which appears in older literature is ‘Liberators’. It should be noted that until 11 August 1933 the organization was formally called Eesti Vabadussõjalaste Keskliit (‘The Estonian War of Independence Veterans’ Central League’). 2 Ernst Nolte, The Three Faces of Fascism (London, 1965), p. 12. 3 Eduard Laaman, Vabadussõjalased diktatuuri teel (Tallinn, 1933); Erakonnad Eestis (Tartu, 1934), pp. 54–62; ‘Põhiseaduse kriisi arenemine 1928–1933’, in Põhiseadus ja Rahvuskogu (Tallinn, 1937), pp. 29–45; Konstantin Päts. Poliitika- ja riigimees (Stockholm, 1949). 4 Märt Raud, Kaks suurt: Jaan Tõnisson, Konstantin Päts ja nende ajastu (Toronto, 1953); Evald Uustalu, The History of Estonian People (London, 1952); Artur Mägi, Das Staatsleben Estlands während seiner Selbständigkeit. I. Das Regierungssystem (Stockholm, 1967). 5 William Tomingas, Vaikiv ajastu Eestis (New York, 1961). 6 Georg von Rauch, The Baltic States: The Years of Independence 1917–1940 (London, 1974); V. Stanley Vardys, ‘The Rise of Authoritarianism in the Baltic States’, in V. Stanley Vardys and Romuald J. Misiunas, eds., The Baltic States in War and Peace (University Park, Pennsylvania, 1978), pp. 65–80; Toivo U. Raun, Estonia and the Estonians (Stanford, 1991); John Hiden and Patrick Salmon, The Baltic Nations and Europe: Estonia, Latvia & Lithuania in the Twentieth Century (London, 1991). -
N.I.0! L.L Ila-SI
¦("^¦HP^' «IV ^* *-r .^¦B*TT3T^^^^^HIPH*ir>H'lJ»»S4»PWWBBC ¦¦TVBHI^H " '*'#'':1? . 'p"nw?a ¦ . ¦:,.¦¦< ':_Mm __«- %'. * 9*9*«BBH -V '' * . ''^'''iWJ 'O" -.«*.-- ^ *;•$,¦; i*J ..•___! :.___..* ¦+** «'..f^^H BRA?!!¦¦- F.*ffl ORNAL DO- Bed-.t_.chef-* Dr. FERNANDO MENDES OI ALMEIDA 'i a-uwí. xxiii HIO l)l«. .IANKIKO— Qiia#afeira, 13 de Agosto dc 1913 rzz__z__^i_i_rr_r_^^ i «jorro*-, nn A IjU«!A*BIí iiiiiu mo.jii pariu* ' \ fiUi.AM._i*. uina liiiud.Uu «. TilJÇOIBA-líl. d.i una |...rl,|in EXPEDIENTE coxriTimo nr. tan 1'Viiiiií.i iiara . <jj.il i.i uu nrru. * Jt iiiiu>)lllmu.|olrn a umu • .i|..-ii ii | ¦*• ajudam.» ii« ciiKolitliiu li Iru, | ii.iidul..i, ifi lliiilça d" nun aon» ., Xinndolra; no l.•".¦.. 'lo mu para »u>i..!'mr au» dia»; nu rua TELECRAPI .O.. SEM FIO WS^iã^ãi^. MMAM«WMVWWWWMVWNM«VMW*tf>>W>>_-W»_-«MM |A. 01 -0! •_\fr ,, 'l c f.i; lifu.i. tm i.i <J<i - ..¦ i. „, iv polira i»f II. .100, Io ni. ai.7_«i «A. oi.no -¦*.<_¦<_-__- "...:'.- I di- um» rmpr.-II** e AdmlniRtrin.i.0! l.l ilA-SI. umn. uni'., pi.nu- ; Ji.1;.,...»"' IMíi-.-l-IA-HB •«. l 1,1*. i.i. M*. iitiui iiiuçii imin lu- ;\.|| ,. , p„ra uiii.i r,a ou '-- IW-fl-A i" unua (; riu <-tu ¦•• da; r. rtriindor Ku-ublo Avenida Bio Branco n_. HO ilvur !• iiUKi.iiiriiur, cima do i uniu |,-ii,t i*.u.'*'U *¦ *# ../n. i,.,va iodo A. WO 12% paru „„ run Kr.l 'JI..3S1 ,p<iri piu-a u m' fiiiii |l|i de tiiilitri u.l r. -
The Construction of the 'We'-Category: Political Rhetoric in Soviet Estonia from June 1940 to July 1941
Sign Systems Studies 35.1/2, 2007 The construction of the ‘we’-category: Political rhetoric in Soviet Estonia from June 1940 to July 1941 Andreas Ventsel Department of Semiotics, University of Tartu 78 Tiigi St. 50410 Tartu, Estonia e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. The article asks, how one of the basic notions of cultural-political identity — we — is constructed in mass media, viz. which kind of semiotic and linguistic facilities are used in constructing a political unity. The approach used in this article is based on Lotman’s semiotic theory of culture and on the analysis of pronouns in political texts, using Emil Benvenist’s theory of deixis. Our case study concentrates on the years 1940–1941 which mark one of the most crucial periods in Estonian nearest history. The source material of the analysis consists of speeches of new political elite in power, all of which were published in major daily newspapers at the time. In outline, first year of soviet power in Estonia can be divided in two periods. First period would be from June 21 to “July elections” in 1940. In political rhetoric, new political elite tried to create a monolithic subject, the unity between themselves and people (people’s will) by emphasizing activity and freedom of self- determination. Nevertheless, starting from “elections”, especially from the period after “accepting” Soviet Republic of Estonia as a full member of Soviet Union, a transition of we-concept from an active subject to mere passive recipient can be detected. From that time on, people’s will was envisaged as entirely determined by marxist-leninist ideology and “the Party”.