DOCSLIB.ORG

Prominent Logicians from Aristotle to Godel (1931)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Prominent Logicians from Aristotle to Godel (1931) Prominent Logicians from Aristotle to Godel (1931) https://www.historyoflogic.com/great-logicians.htm History of Logic from Aristotle to Gödel by Raul Corazzon | e-mail: [email protected] A Selection of Prominent Logicians from Aristotle to Gödel (1931) INTRODUCTION SEP = There is an entry in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy IEP = There is an entry in the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy Aristotle (384 BC - 322 BC) | SEP | IEP | Aristotle's Logic: Introductory Readings and the Syllogistic Aristotle's De Interpretatione: Semantics and Philosophy of Language Aristotle's Theory of Categorical Syllogism in the Prior Analytics On the website "Theory and History of Ontology" Aristotle's Categories. Annotated Bibliography of the studies in English: First part: A - C Second part: D - H Third part: I - O Fourth part: P - Z Bibliographie des études en français sur les Catégories d'Aristote Bibliographie der deutschen Studien zur Aristoteles Kategorien Bibliografia degli studi italiani sulle Categorie di Aristotele 1 of 14 4/15/2019, 5:10 PM Prominent Logicians from Aristotle to Godel (1931) https://www.historyoflogic.com/great-logicians.htm Annotated Bibliography of the studies in English: Complete Version (only PDF) Disciples of Aristotle Eudemus of Rhodes (c. 350 BC - 290 BC) and Theophrastus of Eresus (371 BC - c. 287 BC) | SEP | IEP | The Dialectical School Philo the Dialectician (4th century BC) Diodorus Cronus (second-half of the 4th century BC) | SEP | Stoics Zeno of Citium (c. 334 BC - 262 BC) Cleanthes of Assos (c. 331 BC - c. 232 BC) | IEP | Chrysippus (c. 280 - c. 207 BC) | IEP | Epictetus (50 - 130) | SEP | IEP | Epicureans Philodemus of Gadara (c. 110 - c. 40 BC) | SEP | Greek Commentators of Aristotle's Logical Works Alexander of Aphrodisias (end of 2nd century) | SEP | 2 of 14 4/15/2019, 5:10 PM Prominent Logicians from Aristotle to Godel (1931) https://www.historyoflogic.com/great-logicians.htm Porphyry (234? - 305?) | SEP | Ammonius Hermeiou (c. 435/445 - 517/526) | SEP | Simplicius of Cilicia (c. 490 - c. 560) John Philoponus (c. 490 - c. 570) Other Greek Logicians Claudius Galenus (129 - 200) | SEP | Sextus Empiricus (160 - 210) Plotinus (204 - 270) | SEP | Proclus Diadocus (412 - 485) | SEP | Diogenes Laërtius (3rd century) Latin Logic before Eleventh Century Cicero (106 BC 43 BC) | SEP | Lucius Apuleius of Madaura (c. 123/125 - 180) Marius Victorinus (4th century) Martianus Capella (5th century) Anicius Manlius Severinus Boethius (c. 480 - 524 or 525) | SEP | Byzantine Logicians (from 6th to 12th century) 3 of 14 4/15/2019, 5:10 PM Prominent Logicians from Aristotle to Godel (1931) https://www.historyoflogic.com/great-logicians.htm Alcuin of York (c. 735 - 804) John Scottus Eriugena (c. 815 - 877) | SEP | Logic in the Eleventh Century Abbo of Fleury (c. 945 - 1004) Anselm of Canterbury (1033 - 1109) | SEP | IEP | Al Kindi (c. 801 - 873) | SEP | Al-Farabi (c. 872 - 950/951) | SEP | Avicenna (Ibn Sina) (c. 980 - 1037) | SEP | IEP | Peter Damian (1007 - 1072) | SEP | Averroes (Ibn Rushd) (1126 - 1198) | IEP | Logic and Grammar in Twelfth Century The anonymous Glosulae super Priscianum (written between 1080 and 1150) Roscelin (c. 1050 - c. 1125) William of Champeaux (c. 1070 - 1122) | SEP | Garlandus Computista [Gerlandus of Besançon] (early 12th century) Peter Abelard (1079 - 1142) | SEP | IEP | Adam Parvipontanus (or Adam of Balsham) (? - 1181) 4 of 14 4/15/2019, 5:10 PM Prominent Logicians from Aristotle to Godel (1931) https://www.historyoflogic.com/great-logicians.htm Gilbert of Poitiers (after 1085 - 1154) John of Salisbury (c. 1120 - 1180) | SEP | Moses Maimonides (1135 m- 1204) | SEP | IEP | Logic and Grammar in Thirteenth Century 5 of 14 4/15/2019, 5:10 PM Prominent Logicians from Aristotle to Godel (1931) https://www.historyoflogic.com/great-logicians.htm William of Sherwood (or Shyreswood) (1200/5 - 1266/71) | SEP | Albert the Great (1200 - 1280) | SEP | Peter of Spain (d. 1277) | SEP | Robert Kilwardby (1215? - 1279) | SEP | Roger Bacon (1215 - 1294) | SEP | IEP | Henry of Ghent (c. 1217 - 1293) | SEP | Richard the Sophister (second quarter of the 13th century) | SEP | Ramón Llull (c. 1233 - 1316) Giles of Romes (1243 - 1316) | SEP | Boethius of Dacia (fl. 1260 - 1270) William Heytesbury (? - d. 1272/3) Simon of Faversham (c. 1260 - 1306) | SEP | John Duns Scotus (c. 1266 - 1308) | SEP | IEP | Radulphus Brito (c. 1270 - 1320) Logic and Grammar in Fourteenth Century Pseudo-Scotus (14th century) Thomas of Erfurt (first quarter of the 14th century) | SEP | IEP | Walter Burley (c. 1275 - 1344) | SEP | 6 of 14 4/15/2019, 5:10 PM Prominent Logicians from Aristotle to Godel (1931) https://www.historyoflogic.com/great-logicians.htm Peter Aureoli (c. 1280 - 1322) Siger of Courtrai (c. 1283 - 1341) William of Ockham (c. 1287 - 1347) | SEP | IEP | Walter Chatton (c. 1290 - 1343) | SEP | Robert Holkot (c. 1290 - 1349) Thomas Bradwardine (c. 1290 - 1349) John Buridan (c. 1300 - after 1358) | SEP | Gregory of Rimini (c. 1300 - 1358) | SEP | Nicholas of Autrecourt (c. 1300 - after 1358) | SEP | Richard Kilvington (1305 - 1361) | SEP | Albert of Saxony (c. 1316 - 1390) | SEP | John Wyclif (c. 1330 - 1384) | SEP | Marsilius of Inghen (c. 1340 - 1396) | SEP | Robert Alyngton ( ? - 1398) | SEP | William Crathorn (fl. 1330) | SEP | Richard Billingham (fl. 1350 - 1360) Peter of Mantua (d. 1400) Vincent Ferrer (c. 1350 - 1420/1) Peter of Ailly (c. 1350 - 1420) 7 of 14 4/15/2019, 5:10 PM Prominent Logicians from Aristotle to Godel (1931) https://www.historyoflogic.com/great-logicians.htm Sharpe Johannes (c. 1360 - 1515) | SEP | William Penbygull ( ? - 1420 | SEP |) Paul of Venice (c. 1369 - 1429) | SEP | Paul of Pergola (1380 - 1455) Logicians of the Fifteenth Century George of Trebizond (1395 - 1472/3) Nicholas of Cusa (1401 - 1464) Lorenzo Valla (1407 - 1457) | SEP | Rodolphus Agricola (1444 - 1485) Pico della Mirandola (1463 - 1494) | SEP | Logic in the Modern Age. First Part: 1500 - 1640 Jean Luis Vivés (1493 - 1540) | SEP | Domingo de Soto (1494 - 1560) Philipp Melanchthon (1497 – 1560) Petrus Ramus (1515 - 1572) | SEP | Pedro da Fonseca (1528 - 1599) Franciscus Toletus (1532 - 1596) 8 of 14 4/15/2019, 5:10 PM Prominent Logicians from Aristotle to Godel (1931) https://www.historyoflogic.com/great-logicians.htm Giacomo (Jacopo) Zabarella (1533 - 1589) | SEP | Bartholomäus Keckermann (1572 - 1609) Joachim Jungius (1587 - 1657) Robert Sanderson (1587 - 1663) Thomas Hobbes (1588 - 1679) | SEP | IEP | Franco Burgersdijk (1590 - 1635) Gassendi Pierre (1592 - 1655) | SEP | The Conimbricenses (In universam dialectica Aristotelis, 1606) Logic in the Modern Age. Second Part: 1640 - 1780 Athanasius Kircher (1601/2 - 1680) Sebastián Izquierdo (1601 - 1681) Juan Caramuel y Lobkowtiz (1606 - 1682) Georges Dalgarno (1616 - 1687) Antoine Arnauld (1612 - 1694) | IEP | John Wallis (1616 - 1703) Johannes Clauberg (1622 - 1665) Arnold Geulincx (1624 - 1669) John Locke (1632 – 1704) 9 of 14 4/15/2019, 5:10 PM Prominent Logicians from Aristotle to Godel (1931) https://www.historyoflogic.com/great-logicians.htm Nicolas Malebranche (1638 – 1715) Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646 - 1716) | SEP | IEP | Ehrenfried Walther von Tschirnhaus (1651 – 1708) Christian Thomasius (1655 - 1728) Johann Franz Budde (1667 - 1729) Giovanni Girolamo Saccheri (1667 - 1733) Andreas Rüdiger (1673 - 1731) Christian Wolff (1679 - 1754) | SEP | Johann Peter Reusch (1691 - 1758) Johann Georg Walch (1693 – 1775) Joahann Andreas Segner (1704 - 1777) Leonhard Euler (1707 - 1783) Étienne Bonnot de Condillac (1714 - 1780) | SEP | IEP | Joachim Georg Darjes (1714 - 1791) Gottfried Ploucquet (1716 - 1790) Georg Friedrich Meier (1718 – 1777) Immanuel Kant (1724 - 1804) | SEP | IEP | Johann Heinrich Lambert (1728 - 1777) Nicolas Condorcet (1743 - 1794) 10 of 14 4/15/2019, 5:10 PM Prominent Logicians from Aristotle to Godel (1931) https://www.historyoflogic.com/great-logicians.htm Logic in First Half of Nineteenth Century Jeremy Bentham (1748 - 1832) | SEP | IEP | Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770 - 1831) Joseph Diaz Gergonne (1771 - 1859) Samuel Taylor Coleridge (1772 - 1834) Bernard Bolzano (1781 - 1848) | SEP | IEP | Richard Whateley (1787 - 1863) William Hamilton (1788 - 1856) William Whewell (1794 - 1866) | SEP | Friedrich Adolf Trendelenburg (1802 - 1872) Augustus De Morgan (1806 - 1871) John Stuart Mill (1806 - 1873) | SEP | IEP | Logic in the Second Half of Nineteenth Century George Boole (1815 - 1864) | SEP | Hermann Lotze (1817- 1881) | SEP | Christoph von Sigwart (1830 - 1904) Charles Dodgson [Lewis Carroll] (1832 - 1898) John Venn (1834 - 1923) 11 of 14 4/15/2019, 5:10 PM Prominent Logicians from Aristotle to Godel (1931) https://www.historyoflogic.com/great-logicians.htm William Stanley Jevons (1835 - 1882) Hugh MacColl (1837 - 1909) Victoria, Lady Welby (1837 - 1912) Franz Brentano (1838 - 1917) | SEP | Charles Saunders Peirce (1839 - 1914) | SEP | IEP | Ernst Schröder (1841 - 1902) Georg Cantor (1845 - 1918) Francis Herbert Bradley (1846 - 1924) | SEP | IEP | Christine Ladd-Franklin (1847 - 1930) Bernard Bosanquet (1848 - 1923) | SEP | Gottlob Frege (1848 - 1925) | SEP | IEP | Logic in the Twentieth Century John Neville Keynes (1852 - 1949) Alexius Meinong (1853 - 1920) | SEP | Giuseppe Peano (1858 - 1932) Edmund Husserl (1859 - 1938) | SEP | IEP | Alfred Whitehead (1861 - 1947) | SEP | IEP | David Hilbert (1862 - 1943) 12 of 14 4/15/2019, 5:10 PM Prominent Logicians from Aristotle to Godel (1931) https://www.historyoflogic.com/great-logicians.htm Louis
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Was Shakespeare a Ramist?
    The Oxfordian Volume 22 October 2020 ISSN 1521-3641 The OXFORDIAN The Oxfordian is the peer-reviewed journal of the Shakespeare Oxford Fellowship, a non-profit educational organization that conducts research and publication on the Early Modern period, William Shakespeare and the authorship of Shakespeare’s works. Founded in 1998, the journal offers research articles, essays and book reviews by academicians and independent scholars, and is published annually during the autumn. Writers interested in being published in The Oxfordian should review our publication guidelines at the Shakespeare Oxford Fellowship website: https://shakespeareoxfordfellowship.org/the-oxfordian/ Our postal mailing address is: The Shakespeare Oxford Fellowship PO Box 66083 Auburndale, MA 02466 USA Queries may be directed to the editor, Gary Goldstein, at [email protected] Back issues of The Oxfordian may be obtained by writing to: [email protected] 2 The OXFORDIAN Volume 22 2020 Was Shakespeare a Ramist? Reviewed by Michael Dudley The Rational Shakespeare: Peter Ramus, Edward de Vere, and the Question of Authorship. By Michael Wainwright. Palgrave Macmillan 2018 (324 pp.) in hardcover, paperback and Kindle. he question regarding the authorship of the Works of Shakespeare has for generations been dismissed by most of the intelligentsia as patent Tnonsense or a conspiracy theory—in short, as highly irrational—with a correspondingly dim view of its proponents’ intelligence and sanity. It is therefore singularly refreshing and impres- sive that a scholarly work that acknowledges Edward de Vere as Shakespeare should be entirely premised on an exploration of rationalism, not only in terms of the worldview apparent in the Shakespeare canon, but as a structured argument unto itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Antoine De Chandieu (1534-1591): One of the Fathers Of
    CALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ANTOINE DE CHANDIEU (1534-1591): ONE OF THE FATHERS OF REFORMED SCHOLASTICISM? A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF CALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BY THEODORE GERARD VAN RAALTE GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN MAY 2013 CALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY 3233 Burton SE • Grand Rapids, Michigan • 49546-4301 800388-6034 fax: 616 957-8621 [email protected] www. calvinseminary. edu. This dissertation entitled ANTOINE DE CHANDIEU (1534-1591): L'UN DES PERES DE LA SCHOLASTIQUE REFORMEE? written by THEODORE GERARD VAN RAALTE and submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy has been accepted by the faculty of Calvin Theological Seminary upon the recommendation of the undersigned readers: Richard A. Muller, Ph.D. I Date ~ 4 ,,?tJ/3 Dean of Academic Programs Copyright © 2013 by Theodore G. (Ted) Van Raalte All rights reserved For Christine CONTENTS Preface .................................................................................................................. viii Abstract ................................................................................................................... xii Chapter 1 Introduction: Historiography and Scholastic Method Introduction .............................................................................................................1 State of Research on Chandieu ...............................................................................6 Published Research on Chandieu’s Contemporary
    [Show full text]
  • The Proclaimed and Visible Word PETER H
    Word & World 7/2 (1987) Copyright © 1987 by Word & World, Luther Seminary, St. Paul, MN. All rights reserved. page 179 The Proclaimed and Visible Word PETER H. VAN NESS Union Theological Seminary, New York, New York In a recent book, Habits of the Heart, Robert Bellah and colleagues report on the current status of American individualism. As has been the case since Alexis de Tocqueville’s Democracy in America, such reflections reveal an enduring feature of American social life. In Bellah’s words: “The inner tensions of American individualism add up to a classic case of ambivalence. We strongly assert the value of our self-reliance and autonomy. We deeply feel the emptiness of a life without sustaining social commitments.”1 The consequences of the American individualist credo can be loneliness, when autonomy is too greatly valued, or conformism, when a rejection of traditional authority combines with an excessive deference to contemporary peers. David Riesman coined the phrase “the lonely crowd” to describe the American social character which suffers in both of these ways.2 One of Bellah’s remedies for such social ills is the nurturing of a culture of meaning and coherence. “We need to learn again from the cultural riches of the human species and to reappropriate and revitalize those riches so that they can speak to our condition today.”3 Biblical and republican traditions stand foremost in Bellah’s list of cultural legacies in need of revitalization. Many Americans seek relief from contemporary social distress in communities of religious worship. The Christian community at worship seems to be a fitting antidote to the social ills portrayed here.
    [Show full text]
  • Network Map of Knowledge And
    Humphry Davy George Grosz Patrick Galvin August Wilhelm von Hofmann Mervyn Gotsman Peter Blake Willa Cather Norman Vincent Peale Hans Holbein the Elder David Bomberg Hans Lewy Mark Ryden Juan Gris Ian Stevenson Charles Coleman (English painter) Mauritz de Haas David Drake Donald E. Westlake John Morton Blum Yehuda Amichai Stephen Smale Bernd and Hilla Becher Vitsentzos Kornaros Maxfield Parrish L. Sprague de Camp Derek Jarman Baron Carl von Rokitansky John LaFarge Richard Francis Burton Jamie Hewlett George Sterling Sergei Winogradsky Federico Halbherr Jean-Léon Gérôme William M. Bass Roy Lichtenstein Jacob Isaakszoon van Ruisdael Tony Cliff Julia Margaret Cameron Arnold Sommerfeld Adrian Willaert Olga Arsenievna Oleinik LeMoine Fitzgerald Christian Krohg Wilfred Thesiger Jean-Joseph Benjamin-Constant Eva Hesse `Abd Allah ibn `Abbas Him Mark Lai Clark Ashton Smith Clint Eastwood Therkel Mathiassen Bettie Page Frank DuMond Peter Whittle Salvador Espriu Gaetano Fichera William Cubley Jean Tinguely Amado Nervo Sarat Chandra Chattopadhyay Ferdinand Hodler Françoise Sagan Dave Meltzer Anton Julius Carlson Bela Cikoš Sesija John Cleese Kan Nyunt Charlotte Lamb Benjamin Silliman Howard Hendricks Jim Russell (cartoonist) Kate Chopin Gary Becker Harvey Kurtzman Michel Tapié John C. Maxwell Stan Pitt Henry Lawson Gustave Boulanger Wayne Shorter Irshad Kamil Joseph Greenberg Dungeons & Dragons Serbian epic poetry Adrian Ludwig Richter Eliseu Visconti Albert Maignan Syed Nazeer Husain Hakushu Kitahara Lim Cheng Hoe David Brin Bernard Ogilvie Dodge Star Wars Karel Capek Hudson River School Alfred Hitchcock Vladimir Colin Robert Kroetsch Shah Abdul Latif Bhittai Stephen Sondheim Robert Ludlum Frank Frazetta Walter Tevis Sax Rohmer Rafael Sabatini Ralph Nader Manon Gropius Aristide Maillol Ed Roth Jonathan Dordick Abdur Razzaq (Professor) John W.
    [Show full text]
  • Pomponazzi on Identity and Individuation Han Thomas Adriaenssen Abstract. Aristotle Defines Growing As a Process in Which An
    Final version forthcoming in Journal of the History of Philosophy Pomponazzi on Identity and Individuation Han Thomas Adriaenssen Abstract. Aristotle defines growing as a process in which an individual living being persists as it accumulates new matter. This definition raises the question of what enables an individual to persist as its material composition continuously changes over time. This paper provides a systematic account of Pietro Pomponazzi’s answer to this question. In his De nutritione et augmentatione, Pomponazzi argues that individuals persist in virtue of their forms. Forms are individuated in part by their material, causal, and temporal origins, which commits Pomponazzi to the view that individuals necessarily have the material, causal, and temporal origins they do. I provide an account of why Pomponazzi was willing to this view. While his opponents remain unnamed, I argue that his arguments for this view are best read as addressing, among others, Paul of Venice and Gregory of Rimini. In On Generation and Corruption, Aristotle describes growing as a process in which “any and every part of the growing magnitude is made bigger . by the accession of something, and thirdly in such a way that the growing thing is preserved and persists” (321a18–22).1 For instance, when an animal grows as the result of the intake of food, all of its limbs grow larger as the result of the intake of new matter, in such a way that the same individual animal persists throughout the process. 1 All Aristotle translations are taken from the Jonathan Barnes edition of the Complete Works. 1 Final version forthcoming in Journal of the History of Philosophy Simple though it may perhaps appear, this definition confronted Aristotle’s later followers and commentators with a problem.
    [Show full text]
  • Over Francis Bacon Van Verulam En De Methode Van Natuuronderzoek. Justus Von Liebig
    Over Francis Bacon van Verulam en de methode van natuuronderzoek. Justus von Liebig. https://archive.org/details/ueberfrancisbaco00lieb/page/n9 Dit is een geannoteerde vertaling van Ueber Francis Bacon von Verulam und die Methode der Naturforschung (1863) door Justus von Liebig (1803-1873). Noten van de vertaler zijn aangegeven met nummers in teksthaken [ ]. De vertaling is geïnspireerd door een artikel van E.-J. Wagenmakers in Skepter 32.2 (zomer 2019) getiteld: ‘Het plagiaat van Lord Francis Bacon’. Liebigs verhandeling is de schriftelijke weergave van een rede voor de k. Akademie der Wisschenschaften te München op 28 maart 1863. Justus von Liebig was sinds 1859 president van deze Akademie. In Reden und Abhandlungen von Justus von Liebig, (onder redactie van M. Carriere), C. F. Winter’sche Verlagshandlung, Leipzig und Heidelberg, 1874, staat een kortere – wellicht de oorspronkelijke – versie. In deze Reden und Abhandlungen staat een tweetal zeer lezenswaardige reacties (samen nog langer dan de toespraak in de Reden zelf) op kritiek van de zijde van een professor in de filosofie, Christoph von Sigwart (Liebig schrijft Siegwart). Sigwart had uitvoerig betoogd dat Bacons filosofie nergens op sloeg, maar dat Leibig toch te streng was wat betreft Bacons relatie met de natuurwetenschap. Een Engelse vertaling verscheen in twee delen in Macmillan’s Magazine, juli en augustus 1863. Ook daarin ontbreken sommige passages die in de Duitse versie van 1863 staan. Voor de Engelse vertalingen van teksten uit Novum Organum is de vertaling van J. Spedding uit 1858 gebruikt. De vertaler Jan Willem Nienhuys Voorwoord Twintig jaar geleden had een reeks onderzoekingen naar de levensvoorwaarden van planten en dieren mij tot duidelijker inzichten gebracht dan die toentertijd golden.
    [Show full text]
  • Petrus Ramus Y El Derecho
    Petrus Ramus y el Derecho Rafael Ramis Barceló Petrus Ramus y el Derecho The Figuerola Institute Programme: Legal History The Programme “Legal History” of the Figuerola Institute of Social Science History –a part of the Carlos III University of Madrid– is devoted to improve the overall knowledge on the history of law from different points of view –academically, culturally, socially, and institutionally– covering both ancient and modern eras. A number of experts from several countries have participated in the Programme, bringing in their specialized knowledge and dedication to the subject of their expertise. To give a better visibility of its activities, the Programme has published in its Book Series a number of monographs on the different aspects of its academic discipline. Publisher: Carlos III University of Madrid Book Series: Legal History Editorial Committee: Manuel Ángel Bermejo Castrillo, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid Catherine Fillon, Université Jean Moulin Lyon 3 Manuel Martínez Neira, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid Carlos Petit, Universidad de Huelva Cristina Vano, Università degli studi di Napoli Federico II More information at www.uc3m.es/legal_history Petrus Ramus y el Derecho Los juristas ramistas del siglo XVI Rafael Ramis Barceló Historia del derecho, 40 © 2015 Rafael Ramis Barceló Editorial Dykinson c/ Meléndez Valdés, 61 – 28015 Madrid Tlf. (+34) 91 544 28 46 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.dykinson.com Preimpresión: TALLERONCE ISBN: 978-84-9085-683-3 ISSN: 2255-5137 D.L.: M-2486-2016 Versión electrónica disponible en e-Archivo http://hdl.handle.net/10016/22197 Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España Para Antonio Planas Rosselló ÍNDICE Introducción .
    [Show full text]
  • Front Matter
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-60893-0 - The Cambridge Companion to Renaissance Philosophy Edited by James Hankins Frontmatter More information THE CAMBRIDGE COMPANION TO RENAISSANCE PHILOSOPHY The Cambridge Companion to Renaissance Philosophy provides an introduction to a complex period of change in the subject matter and practice of philosophy. The philosophy of the fourteenth through sixteenth centuries is often seen as transitional between the scholastic philosophy of the Middle Ages and modern philosophy, but the essays collected here, by a distinguished international team of contributors, call these assumptions into question, emphasizing both the continuity with scholastic philosophy and the role of Renaissance philosophy in the emergence of modernity. They explore the ways in which the science, religion, and politics of the period reflect and are reflected in its philosophical life, and they emphasize the dynamism and pluralism of a period which saw both new perspectives and enduring contributions to the history of philosophy. This will be an invaluable guide for students of philosophy, intellectual historians, and all who are interested in Renaissance thought. JAMES HANKINS is Professor of History at Harvard University and editor of Renaissance Civic Humanism: Reappraisals and Reflections (2000, 2004). © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-60893-0 - The Cambridge Companion to Renaissance Philosophy Edited by James Hankins Frontmatter More information THE CAMBRIDGE COMPANION TO
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1, the Sense and Task of Phenomenological Research
    University of Alberta Heidegger’s Critique of the Cartesian Problem of Scepticism by Sean Daniel Hartford A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Philosophy ©Sean Daniel Hartford Spring 2010 Edmonton, Alberta Permission is hereby granted to the University of Alberta Libraries to reproduce single copies of this thesis and to lend or sell such copies for private, scholarly or scientific research purposes only. Where the thesis is converted to, or otherwise made available in digital form, the University of Alberta will advise potential users of the thesis of these terms. The author reserves all other publication and other rights in association with the copyright in the thesis and, except as herein before provided, neither the thesis nor any substantial portion thereof may be printed or otherwise reproduced in any material form whatsoever without the author's prior written permission. Examining Committee Dr. Marie-Eve Morin, Philosophy, University of Alberta Dr. Robert Burch, Philosophy, University of Alberta Dr. Wesley Cooper, Philosophy, University of Alberta Dr. Leo Mos, Psychology, University of Alberta Abstract: This thesis deals with Martin Heidegger’s critique of the Cartesian problem of scepticism in Being and Time. In addition to the critique itself, Heidegger’s position with regards to the sense and task of phenomenological research, as well as fundamental ontology, is discussed as a necessary underpinning of his critique. Finally, the objection to Heidegger’s critique that is raised by Charles Guignon in his book, Heidegger and the Problem of Knowledge, (namely, that it suffers from the problem of reflexivity) is evaluated.
    [Show full text]
  • Eric W. Hagedorn Curriculum Vitae
    Eric W. Hagedorn Curriculum Vitae Areas of Specialization: Medieval Philosophy Areas of Competence: Metaphysics; Early Modern Philosophy; Philosophy of Religion; Philosophy of Mind; Logic Employment St. Norbert College Associate Professor Philosophy (August 2018-Present) Assistant Professor of Philosophy (January 2014 – August 2018) Teaching Fellow of Philosophy (August 2012 – December 2013) Education University of Notre Dame Ph.D. in Philosophy (January 2013) M.A. in Philosophy (January 2008) Iowa State University B.S. with Honors in Computer Science and Philosophy (May 2004) Journal Articles and Book Chapters “Thomas Aquinas through the 1350s,” in The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Ethics, ed. Thomas Williams (forthcoming). “Ockham’s Scientia Argument for Mental Language,” Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy 3 (2015): 145-168. "Is Anyone Else Thinking My Thoughts?: Aquinas's Response to the Too-Many Thinkers Problem," Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 84 (2010): 275-86. Book Reviews Review of John Duns Scotus, On Being and Cognition: Ordinatio I.3, John van den Bercken (tr.) in International Journal for the Philosophy of Religion (forthcoming). Review of Claude Panaccio, Mental Language: From Plato to William of Ockham in Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews (August 2017). Review of Jari Kaukua and Tomas Ekenberg (eds.), Subjectivity and Selfhood in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy in Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews (September 2016). Review of Sander W. de Boer, The Science of the Soul: The Commentary
    [Show full text]
  • Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 M
    Z Zabarella, Jacopo chair of logic, succeeding Tomitano. On 4 January 1569 he secured the second extraordinary chair of Born: 5 September 1533, Padua natural philosophy. There was likely a pause in his Died: 15 October 1589, Padua teaching from 1574 to 1576 on account of the severity of plague in Padua. On 26 March 1577 Marco Sgarbi he acquired the first extraordinary chair of natural Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Venice, Italy philosophy, and in 1578, he published his Opera logica in Venice, thus opening a large debate on the Abstract order and method of knowledge among his con- temporaries – especially with Francesco Jacopo Zabarella (1553–1589) is considered Piccolomini (1520–1604) and Bernardino Petrella one of the most acute and brilliant logicians (1529–1595). In 1580 Zabarella published his of all time. He made an important contribution Tabulae logicae and also founded the Accademia to the interpretation of Aristotle and developed degli Stabili. In 1584, he came under attack in two original ideas especially in the field of logic directions: from Piccolomini in his Universa and epistemology, opening up the pathway of philosophia de moribus, and from Petrella in his early modern science. Logicarum disputationum libri VII. The same year, Zabarella’s reply to Piccolomini was his De doctrina ordine apologia. In the meantime, on Biography 6 September 1585, he became professor of the second ordinary chair of natural philosophy, and He was born in Padua on 5 September 1533, the the following year he published his De naturalis eldest son of Giulio Zabarella. He was well-versed scientiae constitutione.
    [Show full text]
  • The Argument from Logical Principles Against Materialism: a Version of the Argument from Reason
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2019-04-30 The Argument from Logical Principles Against Materialism: A Version of the Argument from Reason Hawkes, Gordon Hawkes, G. (2019). The Argument from Logical Principles Against Materialism: A Version of the Argument from Reason (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. http://hdl.handle.net/1880/110301 master thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY The Argument from Logical Principles Against Materialism: A Version of the Argument from Reason by Gordon Hawkes A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS GRADUATE PROGRAM IN PHILOSOPHY CALGARY, ALBERTA APRIL, 2019 © Gordon Hawkes 2019 i Abstract The argument from reason is the name given to a family of arguments against naturalism, materialism, or determinism, and often for theism or dualism. One version of the argument from reason is what Victor Reppert calls “the argument from the psychological relevance of logical laws,” or what I call “the argument from logical principles.” This argument has received little attention in the literature, despite being advanced by Victor Reppert, Karl Popper, and Thomas Nagel.
    [Show full text]