DOCSLIB.ORG

Philosophy May 20, 2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Philosophy May 20, 2013 Outline of Philosophy May 20, 2013 Contents SOCI>Philosophy .............................................................................................................................................................. 3 SOCI>Philosophy>Aesthetics ....................................................................................................................................... 3 SOCI>Philosophy>Aesthetics>Beauty .................................................................................................................... 4 SOCI>Philosophy>Aesthetics>Theory .................................................................................................................... 4 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology ................................................................................................................................. 5 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Possibility ......................................................................................................... 6 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>World ................................................................................................................ 6 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Object Properties .............................................................................................. 6 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>System Properties ............................................................................................. 6 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Representation .................................................................................................. 7 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Causation .......................................................................................................... 7 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Causation>Origin ......................................................................................... 8 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Causation>Method ....................................................................................... 8 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Causation>Kinds .......................................................................................... 8 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Causation>Kinds>Required .................................................................... 9 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Meaning ............................................................................................................ 9 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Truth ................................................................................................................. 9 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Truth>Characteristics ................................................................................. 10 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Truth>Kinds ............................................................................................... 10 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Knowledge ...................................................................................................... 10 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Knowledge>Data ....................................................................................... 11 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Knowledge>Entailment ............................................................................. 11 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Knowledge>Justification ........................................................................... 11 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Knowledge>Kinds ..................................................................................... 12 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Knowledge>Kinds>Method .................................................................. 12 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Knowledge>Kinds>Subject .................................................................. 12 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Theory ............................................................................................................. 12 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Theory>Reality .......................................................................................... 13 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Theory>Deflationary .................................................................................. 13 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Theory>Methods ........................................................................................ 13 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Theory>Agnosticism .................................................................................. 14 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Theory>Atoms ........................................................................................... 14 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Theory>Mind ............................................................................................. 14 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Theory>Idealism ........................................................................................ 14 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Theory>Realism ......................................................................................... 15 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Methods .......................................................................................................... 16 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Methods>Thought Laws ............................................................................ 16 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Perception ....................................................................................................... 17 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Perception>Paradigms ............................................................................... 17 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Reference Source ............................................................................................ 18 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Reference Source>Association .................................................................. 18 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Relation ........................................................................................................... 18 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Terms .............................................................................................................. 19 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Mental State .................................................................................................... 19 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Mental State>Thought................................................................................ 19 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Mental State>Belief ................................................................................... 20 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Thinking .......................................................................................................... 20 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Thinking>Theories ..................................................................................... 21 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Thinking>Principles ................................................................................... 21 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Thinking>Productions ................................................................................ 22 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Thinking>Productions>Representation ................................................. 22 1 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Thinking>Statement ................................................................................... 23 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Thinking>Statement>Logic .................................................................. 23 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Thinking>Statement>Process ................................................................ 24 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Thinking>Statement>Class ................................................................... 25 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Thinking>Statement>Intention ............................................................. 25 SOCI>Philosophy>Epistemology>Knowledge Argument ..................................................................................... 26 SOCI>Philosophy>Ethics ........................................................................................................................................... 27 SOCI>Philosophy>Ethics>Choices ....................................................................................................................... 28 SOCI>Philosophy>Ethics>Feelings ....................................................................................................................... 29 SOCI>Philosophy>Ethics>Evil .............................................................................................................................. 30 SOCI>Philosophy>Ethics>Theories ...................................................................................................................... 31 SOCI>Philosophy>Ethics>Theories>Feeling ................................................................................................... 32 SOCI>Philosophy>Ethics>Theories>Communitarianism ................................................................................. 32 SOCI>Philosophy>Ethics>Theories>Law ........................................................................................................ 32 SOCI>Philosophy>Ethics>Theories>Utility ..................................................................................................... 33 SOCI>Philosophy>Metaphysics ................................................................................................................................. 33 SOCI>Philosophy>Metaphysics>Cosm ................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Schelling's Naturalism: Motion, Space, and the Volition of Thought
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Scholarship@Western Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 9-23-2015 12:00 AM Schelling's Naturalism: Motion, Space, and the Volition of Thought Ben Woodard The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Tilottama Rajan The University of Western Ontario Joint Supervisor Joan Steigerwald The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in Theory and Criticism A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Doctor of Philosophy © Ben Woodard 2015 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the History of Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Woodard, Ben, "Schelling's Naturalism: Motion, Space, and the Volition of Thought" (2015). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 3314. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/3314 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Schelling's Naturalism: Motion, Space, and the Volition of Thought (Thesis Format: Monograph) by Benjamin Graham Woodard A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctorate of Philosophy in Theory and Criticism The School of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies The University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada © Ben Woodard 2015 Abstract: This dissertation examines F.W.J. von Schelling's Philosophy of Nature (or Naturphilosophie) as a form of early, and transcendentally expansive, naturalism that is, simultaneously, a naturalized transcendentalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Studia Philosophiae Religionis 21
    STUDIA PHILOSOPHIAE RELIGIONIS 21 Editores: Catharina Stenqvist et Eberhard Herrmann Ulf Zackariasson Forces by Which We Live Religion and Religious Experience from the Perspective of a Pragmatic Philosophical Anthropology UPPSALA 2002 Doctoral Dissertation in Philosophy of Religion for the Degree of Doctor of Theology at Uppsala University 2002. ABSTRACT Zackariasson, Ulf. 2002. Forces by which We Live. Religion and Religious Experience from the Perspective of a Pragmatic Philosophical Anthropology. Studia Philosophiae Religionis 21. 254 pp. ISBN 91–628–5169–1. ISSN 0346–5446. This study argues that a pragmatic conception of religion would enable philosophers to make important contributions to our ability to handle concrete problems involving religion. The term ’philosophical anthropology’, referring to different interpretative frameworks, which philosophers draw on to develop conceptions of human phenomena, is introduced. It is argued that the classical pragmatists embraced a philosophical anthro- pology significantly different from that embraced by most philosophers of religion; accordingly, pragmatism offers an alternative conception of religion. It is suggested that a conception of religion is superior to another if it makes more promising contributions to our ability to handle extra-philosophical problems of religion. A pragmatic philosophical anthropology urges us to view human practices as taking shape as responses to shared experienced needs. Religious practices develop to resolve tensions in our views of life. The pictures of human flourishing they present reconstruct our views of life, thereby allowing more significant interaction with the environment, and a more significant life. A modified version of reflective equilibrium is developed to show how we, on a pragmatic conception of religion, are able to supply resources for criticism and reform of religious practices, so the extra-philosophical problems of religion can be handled.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Richard Peter Mckeon Papers 1918-1985
    University of Chicago Library Guide to the Richard Peter McKeon Papers 1918-1985 © 2006 University of Chicago Library Table of Contents Acknowledgments 4 Descriptive Summary 4 Information on Use 4 Access 4 Citation 5 Biographical Note 5 Scope Note 6 Related Resources 7 Subject Headings 7 INVENTORY 8 Series I: Biographical Materials 8 Subseries 1: Professional Materials 8 Subseries 2: Personal Papers and Memorabilia 9 Subseries 3: Family Documents and Correspondence 10 Series II: Correspondence 11 Series III: Subject Files 41 Series IV: Writings 61 Subseries 1: Bibliography 62 Subseries 2: Reprints 62 Subseries 3: Books 63 Sub-subseries 1: William of Ockham Materials 63 Sub-subseries 2: Peter Abailard (Abelard), Sic et Non 65 Sub-subseries 3: Sic et Non Card Files 66 Sub-subseries 4: Other Books 71 Subseries 4: Published Articles 71 Subseries 5: Book Reviews 79 Subseries 6: Unpublished Materials 79 Subseries 7: Miscellaneous 86 Series V: Course Materials 101 Subseries 1: Lecture Notes 101 Subseries 2: Syllabi, Examinations, Handouts 114 Series VI: Conferences 121 Series VII: UNESCO Materials 127 Subseries 1: Preparatory Commission 128 Subseries 2: First General Conference, Paris 128 Subseries 3: Second General Conference, Mexico City 129 Subseries 4: Third General Conference, Beirut 130 Subseries 5: Fifth General Conference, Florence 131 Subseries 6: Sixth General Conference, Paris 131 Subseries 7: Programme Commission Reports 131 Subseries 8: Executive Board of UNESCO Meetings 132 Subseries 9: U.S. National Commission for UNESCO 132 Subseries 10: Miscellaneous 133 Series VIII: Encyclopaedia Britannica 137 Subseries 1: History 137 Subseries 2: Board of Editors Meetings 137 Subseries 3: Roof articles project 138 Subseries 4: Other Articles and Projects 139 Series IX: Miscellaneous Papers 140 Series X: Audio-Visual Materials 140 Subseries 1: Reel Tapes 141 Subseries 2: Microfilm and Glass Plates 144 Series XI: Recommendations and Evaluations 144 Descriptive Summary Identifier ICU.SPCL.RPMCKEON Title McKeon, Richard Peter.
    [Show full text]
  • Institut Für Informatik Der Technischen Universität München
    INSTITUT FÜR INFORMATIK DER TECHNISCHEN UNIVERSITÄT MÜNCHEN EOS: An Epistemological Ontology-driven System for Knowledge Processing Dipl.-Inform. Univ. Wolfgang Wohner Institut für Informatik der Technischen Universität München EOS: An Epistemological Ontology-driven System for Knowledge Processing Dipl.-Inform. Univ. Wolfgang Wohner Vollständiger Abdruck der von der Fakultät für Informatik der Technischen Universität Mün- chen zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften genehmigten Dissertation. Vorsitzender: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Helmut Krcmar Prüfer der Dissertation: 1. Univ.-Prof. Rudolf Bayer, Ph.D. 2. Univ.-Prof. Dr. Manfred Paul, em. Die Dissertation wurde am 27. Februar 2003 bei der Technischen Universität München einge- reicht und durch die Fakultät für Informatik am 22. Oktober 2003 angenommen. Title of the Thesis: EOS: An Epistemological Ontology-driven System for Knowledge Processing Author: Dipl.-Inform. Univ. Wolfgang Wohner Keywords: Knowledge Representation and Processing, Ontologies, Epistemology, Concept Theory Abstract: This thesis introduces EOS, a new approach to knowledge representation and processing that is based on Concept Theory, a unicategorical formalism we developed for defining semanti- cally enriched formal ontologies. Generally, ontologies are a means for knowledge represen- tation and reuse. They provide a shared understanding about a knowledge domain. EOS ex- tends the scope of ontologies by offering means to also formalize epistemological processes, i.e. guidelines for knowledge processing that may be employed in knowledge acquisition, generation and retrieval tasks. This general idea is molded into an EOS framework for epis- temological ontology-driven systems for knowledge processing. On this formal basis we will show how an actual EOS system can be designed, implemented and successfully put to work.
    [Show full text]
  • The Summit of Ancient Latin Mathematical Competence:Apuleius and Augustine
    Roskilde University The Summit of Ancient Latin Mathematical Competence Apuleius and Augustine Høyrup, Jens Published in: Actes du XIIIe Colloque Maghrébin sur l'Histoire des Mathématiques Arabes (COMHISMA13) Publication date: 2018 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Citation for published version (APA): Høyrup, J. (2018). The Summit of Ancient Latin Mathematical Competence: Apuleius and Augustine. In M. Abdeljaouad, & H. Hedfi (Eds.), Actes du XIIIe Colloque Maghrébin sur l'Histoire des Mathématiques Arabes (COMHISMA13) (pp. 157-170). COMHISHA. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain. • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 23. Sep. 2021 13e colloque maghrébin sur l’histoire des mathématiques arabes, Tunis 2018 THE SUMMIT OF ANCIENT LATIN MATHEMATICAL COMPETENCE: APULEIUS AND AUGUSTINE Jens HØYRUP Roskilde Universitetscenter (Danemark) Dedicated to Samia Ahasniou and Saliha Mostefai Abstract. According to all we know, Latin Antiquity was utterly unfamiliar with the theoretical aspects of mathematics; Quintilian did not know finger reckoning from geometry, while Cicero explains that the Romans were not interested.
    [Show full text]
  • A Conceptual Social Framework That Delivers KM Values to Corporate Organizations
    EMSoD — A Conceptual Social Framework that Delivers KM Values to Corporate Organizations Christopher Adetunji, Leslie Carr Web Science Institute School of Electronics and Computer Science University of Southampton Southampton, England Email: fca6g14, [email protected] Abstract—As social software is becoming increasingly disruptive the Enterprise Mobility and Social [media] Data (EMSoD) to organizational structures and processes, Knowledge Manage- framework, our proposed conceptual social framework, with ment (KM) initiatives that have hitherto taken the form of a KM value at its core. We provide an overview of our previous ‘knowledge repository’ now need redefining. With the emergence work that culminates in an important measure of KM value of Social Media (SM) platforms like Twitter, the hierarchical — actionable knowledge — upon which a significant business boundaries within the organization are broken down and a lateral decision is made by a case study organization. This is un- flow of information is created. This has created a peculiar kind of tension between KM and SM, in which one is perceived as derpinned by the fact that the real essence of knowledge is its threatening the continued relevance of the other. Particularly, actionability, especially when it contributes to the advancement with the advances of social media and social software, KM is more of a proposed undertaking [3]. Measuring the value of such in need of delivering measurable value to corporate organizations, contributions has been one of the main issues of disagreement if it is to remain relevant in the strategic planning and positioning in Knowledge Management, which is why we devised a of organizations. In view of this, this paper presents EMSoD mechanism for measuring the KM value which our framework — Enterprise Mobility and Social Data — a conceptual social helps in delivering to corporate organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Existence and Reference in Medieval Logic
    GYULA KLIMA EXISTENCE AND REFERENCE IN MEDIEVAL LOGIC 1. Introduction: Existential Assumptions in Modern vs. Medieval Logic “The expression ‘free logic’ is an abbreviation for the phrase ‘free of existence assumptions with respect to its terms, general and singular’.”1 Classical quantification theory is not a free logic in this sense, as its standard formulations commonly assume that every singular term in every model is assigned a referent, an element of the universe of discourse. Indeed, since singular terms include not only singular constants, but also variables2, standard quantification theory may be regarded as involving even the assumption of the existence of the values of its variables, in accordance with Quine’s famous dictum: “to be is to be the value of a variable”.3 But according to some modern interpretations of Aristotelian syllogistic, Aristotle’s theory would involve an even stronger existential assumption, not shared by quantification theory, namely, the assumption of the non-emptiness of common terms.4 Indeed, the need for such an assumption seems to be supported not only by a number of syllogistic forms, which without this assumption appear to be invalid, but also by the doctrine of Aristotle’s De Interpretatione concerning the logical relationships among categorical propositions, commonly summarized in the Square of Opposition. For example, Aristotle’s theory states that universal affirmative propositions imply particular affirmative propositions. But if we formalize such propositions in quantification theory, we get formulae between which the corresponding implication does not hold. So, evidently, there is some discrepancy between the ways Aristotle and quantification theory interpret these categoricals.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Faust Succumbs to Temptations of Economic Mephistopheles, Or, Value by Any Other Name Is Preference
    ENVIRONMENTAL FAUST SUCCUMBS TO TEMPTATIONS OF ECONOMIC MEPHISTOPHELES, OR, VALUE BY ANY OTHER NAME IS PREFERENCE Carol M. Rose* THE ECONOMY OF THE EARTH: PHILOSOPHY, LAW, AND THE ENVI- RONMENT. By Mark Sagoff. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1988. Pp. x, 271. $29.95. In several of the chapters to his new book, Mark Sagoff begins by telling some story to frame the remainder. One of these is particularly significant for the book: Sagoff retells a New Yorker joke in which the Devil tells the new entrants to Hell that they are leaving right and wrong behind, and entering a world of mere preferences (p. 99). The Devil signifies for Sagoff the economics-oriented policy analyst, and the story is prophetic because by the end of the book, that old prefer- ence-counting Devil has caught up with Sagoff. The word "environment" appeared in the titles of several of the earlier essays on which-the book is based,' but the book has wisely subordinated that E-word to a subtitle; despite the frequent invocation of natural wonders and scenic areas, the book doesn't really focus on the environment until the last chapter. Nope, this book is about that other E-word, Economics, which is so favored by the Devil. More specifically, at least until that last chapter, the book is about how dev- ilishly daffy economists are when they talk about the environment. Sagoff thinks their clever confusions are at best distracting and at worst antidemocratic (pp. 10, 95-97), and if we don't watch out, they are going to lead us off the ethical path and straight down the road to perdition.
    [Show full text]
  • Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 M
    Z Zabarella, Jacopo chair of logic, succeeding Tomitano. On 4 January 1569 he secured the second extraordinary chair of Born: 5 September 1533, Padua natural philosophy. There was likely a pause in his Died: 15 October 1589, Padua teaching from 1574 to 1576 on account of the severity of plague in Padua. On 26 March 1577 Marco Sgarbi he acquired the first extraordinary chair of natural Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Venice, Italy philosophy, and in 1578, he published his Opera logica in Venice, thus opening a large debate on the Abstract order and method of knowledge among his con- temporaries – especially with Francesco Jacopo Zabarella (1553–1589) is considered Piccolomini (1520–1604) and Bernardino Petrella one of the most acute and brilliant logicians (1529–1595). In 1580 Zabarella published his of all time. He made an important contribution Tabulae logicae and also founded the Accademia to the interpretation of Aristotle and developed degli Stabili. In 1584, he came under attack in two original ideas especially in the field of logic directions: from Piccolomini in his Universa and epistemology, opening up the pathway of philosophia de moribus, and from Petrella in his early modern science. Logicarum disputationum libri VII. The same year, Zabarella’s reply to Piccolomini was his De doctrina ordine apologia. In the meantime, on Biography 6 September 1585, he became professor of the second ordinary chair of natural philosophy, and He was born in Padua on 5 September 1533, the the following year he published his De naturalis eldest son of Giulio Zabarella. He was well-versed scientiae constitutione.
    [Show full text]
  • Ribes Bowker
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Information and Organization xxx (2009) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Information and Organization journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/infoandorg Between meaning and machine: Learning to represent the knowledge of communities David Ribes a,*, Geoffrey C. Bowker b a Georgetown University, Communication, Culture and Technology, 3520 Prospect St. NW, Suite 311, Washington, DC 20057, United States b Santa Clara University, Science Technology and Society, 500 El Camino Real, Santa Clara, CA 95053, United States article info abstract Article history: Representing knowledge in codified forms is transformative of Received 4 June 2008 ones orientation to that knowledge. We trace the emergence of a Received in revised form 25 March 2009 routine for knowledge acquisition and its consequences for partic- Accepted 20 April 2009 ipants. Over time, participants in the earth science project GEON, Available online xxxx first learned about ontologies and then learned how to create them. We identify three steps in the routine: understanding the Keywords: Ontology development problematic of interoperability; learning the practice of knowledge Routine acquisition; and engaging the broader community. As participants Semantic interoperability traversed the routine they came to articulate, and then represent, Sociology of knowledge representation the knowledge of their communities. In a process we call reappre- Ethnography hension, traversing the routine also transformed participants’ ori- entation towards their data, knowledge and community, making them more keenly aware of the informational aspects of their fields. Ó 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction Ontologies are an information technology for representing specialized knowledge in order to facil- itate communication across disciplines, share data or enable collaboration.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Causation?
    What is Causation? Stathis Psillos INTRODUCTION When we philosophers think about causation we are primarily interested in what causation is what exactly is the relation between cause and effect? Or, more or less equivalently, how and in virtue of what is the cause connected to the effect? But we are also interested in an epistemic issue, viz., the possibility of causal knowledge: how, if at all, can causal knowledge be obtained? The two issues are, of course, conceptually distinct but to many thinkers, there is a connection between them. A metaphysical account of causation would be useless if it did not make, at least in principle, causal knowledge possible. Conversely, many philosophers, mostly of an empiricist persuasion, have taken the possibility of causal knowledge to act as a constraint on the metaphysics of causation: no feature that cannot in principle become the object of knowledge can be attributed to causation. As we shall see, though philosophers have thought about causation for ages, there is hardly an agreement as to what causation is. Perhaps, this is reason enough to be sceptical about the whole prospect for a single and unified metaphysical account of causation. Perhaps, what we are trying to figure out causation is not one single condition with a determinate nature. But this crisis in the foundations of causation is no reason for despair. After all, we can know a lot about what causes what without knowing what causation is or better, without being committed to the view that causation is one single thing in the world. Causation is too precious to be given up.
    [Show full text]
  • Knowledge Technologies in Engineering Design
    INTERNATIONAL DESIGN CONFERENCE - DESIGN 2002 Dubrovnik, May 14 - 17, 2002. KNOWLEDGE TECHNOLOGIES IN ENGINEERING DESIGN Peter Troxler Keywords: Knowledge Technologies, Knowledge Re-Use, Knowledge Maintenance 1. Introduction Knowledge Technologies are used to capture and organise knowledge, to store and retrieve it, to keep it up to date, to disseminate it and to reuse it in different contexts. Knowledge Technologies provide solutions that enable companies to turn individual knowledge into manageable assets. They are vital to the success of companies seeking a competitive advantage in a knowledge-based economy. This article intends to give a survey of the application of knowledge technologies in engineering design. The article gives a short outline of knowledge management and knowledge technologies. The goal is to have a closer look at knowledge related research in engineering design. The article adopts a common framework for knowledge technologies. This framework is a basis to assess recent research contributions. The conclusion suggests areas for future research. 2. Knowledge and Knowledge Management We define knowledge pragmatically as information sufficiently interpreted to enable action. Information might be defined as ‘raw’ data that has been structured and represented for the human senses. Knowledge management aims to make an organisation’s knowledge – information and its corresponding contextual interpretation – available to increase business performance. Knowledge management is the sum of all the processes that govern the identification, creation, capture, dissemination, maintenance and utilisation of knowledge. Knowledge management is a blockbuster trend of today’s business: The amount of information available within and across organisations is increasing. Other trends are a shortage of skilled labour, shortened product life cycles, further rise of global commerce, and the Internet.
    [Show full text]