<<

A PROBLEMATIC TERRARIUM ? Remarks on ornata ornatissima

Joacbi111 Bulia11, Chrysopelea is spread over almost the entire tropical Keble1-strasse 37, D-40468, Diisseldorf, part of SoutheastAsia. Ger111a11y

• COLOURATION~ PATTERN • INTRODUCTION AND SIZE Due to their striking colouration the flying of Within the subspecies ornatissima the Chrysopelea have always been popular ter­ Smith ( 1943) distinguishes two colour morphs that rarium though considered very difficult to keep, appear in different geographic regions: and the conversion to a diet rather difficult to accomplish. Having observed the subspecies Chrysopelea 1: ornata ornatissima in the wild and having kept them in Dorsal colouration, green-yellow or soft-green, every captivity for the last 8 years I can, at least for this sub­ scale has a central black line or circle which is more or , say that they are, contrary to general opinion, less solid black. At regular intervals the scales are com­ very easy animals to maintain. This article is intended pletely black, forming cross stripes. On the ridge of to clear up some of the misunderstandings and inac­ the back a row of red or orange spots may be present curacies that can be found in the literature and to pro­ and formed like three-petaled flowers. The ventral sca­ vide more information on the keeping and breeding of les are green, the head is black with yellow cross ban­ these animals. ding and spots. Subcaudal scales are outlined in black or form a black mesial stripe. In all the specimens from Ceylon that I saw, flower-like spots were present at • GENERAL INFORMATION every second cross band. In specimens from the south AND DISTRIBUTION of these spots were not so obvious or even According to the work of De Rooij, Smith and Mertens, absent. the genus Chrysopelea consists of six species with three Distribution: and the western Ghats south subspecies. These are of the Goa cleft (Fide Wall).

Chrysopelea ornata ornata • Chrysopelea ornata orna­ 2: tissima • Chrysopelea pelias • para­ Like the previous form but without the spots on the disi • Chrysopelea paradisi ce/ebensis • Chrysopelea para­ ridge of the back. In forms from Burma and Siam the disi variabilis • Chrysopelea chrysochlora • Chrysopelea black cross bands are less distinct and may even be taprobanica • Chrysopelea rhodopleurum viridis. absent. The mesial stripes on each scale can then look Of these species only Chrysopelea ornata ornatissima like longitudinal lines. In forms from French lndo- has so far been imported on a regular basis. The genus the black cross bands may be very weak, similar to

Lillerat11rc1 SerJ,e11li11111 • 1997 • 110l11111e 17 • 1111mber 3 forms from the south of India. On occasions where I have witnessed these snakes in Distribution:Throughout lndo-China with extensions full , I have been able to observe the much descri­ to the north-west into the triangle in Burma and the bed 'flying' of this genus. Even though Chrysopelea orna­ Darjeeling region. From Patna, Buxa and down ta ornatissima is not capable of such extended as to the Orissa region to the north-east towards Tongkin Chrysopelea paradisi, its is also nevertheless impressi­ and the south of China (). Occurring south ve. I have often observed how Chrysopelea ornata orna­ to a latitude of 60 °N. tissima, while trying to escape, glided to the ground from a height of six or seven metres. Their posture Body size: - I040 mm, tail length 300 mm during flight was identical to the typical S-shape descri­ - I I00 mm, tail length 275 mm bed in the literature for Chrysopelea paradisi. From this height the snakes can travel a distance of five to six Specimens with a total length of 1400 mm are com­ metres from their launch point. Attempts described mon. by Golder ( 1985) of this species, in a controlled envi­ ronment. unsuccessfully reaching a target distance from Interestingly Trutnau describes Chrysopela paradisi for a height of approximately 2 metres, was probably due the island Phuket on which I found only Chrysopelea to the insufficient height of the launch point. Golder ornata ornatissima. Obviously here both species occur describes the snakes as adopting an outstretched body in the same biotope. According to Tweedie the most position. From my observations in the wild, snakes northern distribution of Chrysopelea paradisi is Penang launching themselves from this height also adopt the in . Cox however also positions it in . outstretched body position. Outside their period of Personally I have not found Chrysopelea paradisi on most activity, the animals are predominantly found Phuket. underneath roof tiles, thatched roofs, wood piles and boards. These hiding places are mainly found at heights of approximately 1.5 metres but the occasional • OBSERVATIONS IN THE is found close to the ground. I noted too that the ani­ WILD mals prefer hiding places in which they have body con­ Observations in the wild are restricted to the area of tact from both below and above. When setting up a the province of Suratthani including the island Koh terrarium for these animals this is certainly something Samui in the South ofThailand. In this region Chrysopelea to consider and an appropriate hide-box should be ornata ornatissima is very common, as in most other supplied. Due to their diurnal lifestyle it was possible parts of its distribution. This is surely due to its remar­ to observe these animals hunting. During this activi­ kable ability to adapt to different biotopes. It is found ty the animals often come to the ground. Once a prey both in jungle and cities. It is active from the early mor­ has been spotted the animal slowly moves towards ning, shortly after sunrise, until the afternoon. This it. Interestingly, (Ca/otes) that sit absolutely still snake can often be found near or even inside houses, are recognised as prey from a distance of one to two hunting its prey. Interestingly, I observed how metres. As soon as the snake has approached its vic­ Chrysopelea ornata ornatissima allowed people to appro­ tim to a distance of 30 centimetres it suddenly moves ach quite close before fleeing. On one occasion, a and strikes. Smaller prey items are eaten alive while Chrysopelea stalking a Tokeh ( gecko), could be larger ones are constricted. Venom is injected into approached undisturbed for up to one metre. However, its prey by chewing motions. The venom however does once disturbed, these snakes can move incredibly fast. not appear to be very potent. On a number of occa-

Lillera1111·a SerjJe11ti11111 • 1997 • volume 17 • 1111111be1· 3 ly the Tokeh slowly retreated. The snake continued its approached till within 5 centimetres of the Tokeh. The Tokeh did indeed hold its mouth wide open, as had been described by the locals. This opening of the mouth however is a well know defensive posture ofTokehs. I unfortunately approached the animals too closely and both Chrysopelea andTokeh fled. Hopefully I will again have the opportunity to observe this behaviour and be able to shed more light on the facts behind these stran­ Investigation area and site where Chrysopelea omata omatissima was found, ge observations of the locals. approximatey 20 l

Littera/11ra Serpe11/i11111 • 1997 • 110[11111e 1 7 • 1111111ber 3 persuaded to eat mice and the larger fema­ les even took adult mice. With a regular sup­ ply of food females have a tendency to exces­ sive weight gain. In my experience it is suffi­ cient to feed the females one adult mouse every two weeks. The problem of obesity has so far not occurred in the males as they are more moderate eaters. Sloughing of adult ani­ mals occurs every four to five months. After a short period of adaptation it is possible to perform minor tasks in the terrarium without Adult female Chrysopelea ornata ornatissima. the animals trying to escape or to bite.

• OBSERVATIONS IN THE TERRARIUM • BREEDING ATTEMPTS Of the animals I had caught, I brought back six to Based on my observations in nature the females were Germany for further study. They were two males and introduced to the males in January 1994. Both males four females. The animals were housed in two sepa­ had sloughed just prior to this. No attempt to mate rate terrariums according to their sex. These meas­ was observed but from May to July 1994 a total of three ured I00 x 70 x 60 cm (L x W x H) for the males and clutches were deposited of which one was fertilised 80 x 70 x 80 cm ((L xW x H) for the females. The tanks and two were unfertilised. The fertilised eggs were were lit with two fluorescent tubes for 12 hours a day. incubated in a plastic box filled with moist peat in an There was no additional heating. During the winter incubator. As for viper eggs, the temperature was months temperatures dropped to about 25°( and in set to 29°C. Unfortunately, after two weeks the eggs the summer, rose to 30°C. Night time temperatures collapsed and moulded. With the fourth clutch in fell to I8 °C in the winter and from 23 to 25°C in the August 1994, (which contained four fertilised and five summer. To accommodate their arboreal lifestyle the unfertilised eggs), I tried to incubate eggs on several cages were fitted with ample climbing facilities. As the types of substrate including no substrate - two eggs snakes are pretty light they hardly damage plants so were incubated on chicken wire over water in a plas­ dense foliage was also supplied. Initially wood shavings tic box. For the other two eggs vermiculite and white were used for substrate. Later on bark chips were peat was used. The incubation temperature was again added. Unfortunately mayflies were introduced with 29°C. Much to my annoyance, however, all eggs moul­ the bark chips and spread through the entire room. ded again after two to three weeks. Extermination was only possible using large amounts To be better prepared for the next years eggs, I con­ of dichlorvos. tacted other people who keep or have kept Chrysopelea During the months of May to November, the terra­ but the news was quite disappointing. With almost riums were sprayed heavily with water every two to everyone the eggs were lost. Only on one occasion three days. During the months December to March, did the eggs hatch. In all other cases the eggs moulded which is also the dry season in Thailand, no water was after two to three weeks. The one successful incuba­ sprayed. Under these conditions the animals were kept tion took place in the Zoo of Dresden that owns spe­ without any difficulties. From the outset, they were cimens of Chrysopelea ornata ornatissima that I had

Litterat11ra Serpe11ti11111 • 199 7 • 1>0/11me 1 7 • 1111111ber 3 brought from Thailand. These animals live in a dense­ Unfortunately these eggs that were deposited rand­ ly vegetated terrarium. Both the laying of the eggs and omly in the terrarium were unfertilised. In total ele­ their incubation took place unnoticed within the ter­ ven eggs were found. Things looked more positive for rarium. Which offered no solution to the problem. the second female though. From May the 20th she fre­ During my next visit to Thailand in January and February quently visited the laying box that had been sup­ of 1995, I tried to find out where Chrysopelea ornata plied. This was a plastic box filled with peat that was deposits her eggs. From the talks I had with the local partially covered with slate. The snake stayed in the people I found out that the eggs were generally not box sometimes for the whole day. The eggs were laid deposited in the soil, but mainly in moist and relative­ on May the 27th and during the course of the after­ ly cool places under stones or wooden boards or in noon a total of eleven eggs were deposited. Of these, crevices. This answer may not necessarily be the right four were unfertilised. The other eggs were put in a one as the eggs that are laid in the soil are surely sel­ plastic box filled with peat. Some eggs were buried dom found. However, this is at least an indication for in the peat, while others were partially covered or a change in the method of breeding. placed on the surface. The eggs that had been com­ The cause of the high number of unfertilised eggs I sus­ pletely or partially covered with peat went bad after pect to be the relatively low temperatures under which two weeks and moulded. The other eggs retained their the animals were kept during the mating season, espe­ colour. The plastic box was incubated in an empty ter­ cially since no breeding attempts were observed. rarium with temperatures varying from 23 to 27°C. A Because of this all six animals were transferred to a second clutch of eggs was laid on May the 3 Ist. Of terrarium measuring I 00 x 80 x 70 cm (L x Bx H}, these ten eggs, five were unfertilised and the remai­ after the males had been kept in a small terrarium at ning eggs were incubated as described above. 25 °C for three months. Lighting was by two fluores­ Unfortunately with this clutch also the eggs that had cent tubes of 18 W, heating by a heating cable. The been incubated on days and began to mould. Two eggs 'decorations' consisted of branches, artificial plants that were opened for inspection contained embryos and several up turned flower pots as hide boxes. Wood that were in an early stage of development (total length shavings was used as a substrate.The water bowl had 10 cm). a capacity of half a litre. Due to the added heating cable, Again in 1996 several clutches of eggs were laid. temperatures in the terrarium rose from 30 to 33°C Young Chrysopelea omata omatissima showing the aoss banding typia/ during the day and fell to 24°C at night. With this rise ofjuveniles. ~IZ::IC in temperature all snakes became significantly more active. A disadvantage of the higher temperature lies in their feeding behaviour. They tend to often bite and even try to constrict each other in the frenzy and my quick intervention has saved the occasional snake. Now I regularly observe the snakes during feeding until all the mice have been eaten. One can only, through adop­ ting this practice, be sure you still have the same num­ ber of snakes in your cage after feeding. Although in 1995 copulation was again not observed, all four females clearly showed signs of being gravid by the end of April. The first eggs were laid on April 28.

Lillel"lll11ra Serpe111i11111 • 1997 • 1•ol11me I • 1111111ber 3 Unfortunately all of these were unfertilised. For this {Wemer 1925); SAUR/A Bd 3/85: 23 -28 reason this article cannot be concluded with positive • Meitens, R. (1968) DieAiten und Unteraiten der results. However, I hope that other people who keep Schmuckbawmchlangen (Chiysopelea) - Chrysopelea may benefit from my experiences and that Senckenbergiana biol (Frankfiu-t/M), 49 (314) S. 191 in time success may be achieved in breeding this spe­ - 217 cies. • Rooij, N de (1911) The ofthe Indo-Australian Archipelago. Ohidia, Leiden (Brill) 334p. • Smith, MA. (1943) The Fauna ofIndia, Ceylon And •AC~NOWLEDGEMENTS Burma; Reptilia andAmphibia Vol 111.-Seipentes 581 I thank Mr Bernd Eichmann, U.inen and Markus Juschka, Seiten Reprint Edition, 1981; Today & Tomon·ow 's Di..isseldorf, for their advice on taking care of Printers and Publishers. New Dehli, 583p. Chrysopelea ornata and my attempts to incubate the • Trutnau, L. (1986) Einige vorlaufige bemerkungen zur eggs. Mrs. GabiAabaslama from Neuss I thank for the Herpetofauna der siidthailandischen lnsel Phuket; translation of the relevant literature. Herpetofauna Bd 8 (43): 17 -27 • Tiueedie M W F. (1983) The snakes ofMalaya, Singapore National Printers (Pte), Singapore, 167p. • LITERATURE • Zapernick, P. und Denzer W (1982) Bissveiietzung • Cox, M J (I 991) The snakes ofThailand and their durch eine 7i·ugnatter - Chiysopelea ornata; SAURIA husbandry, Krieger Publishing Company Maiabai; Ed 4/82: 15 - 16 Florida, 526 S. • Golder, F. (1985) Eine iibersicht iiber die Gattung Ch,ysopelea (Boie 1926) und die Haltung und 7i-anslation .from Geiman by Rene van der Vlugt Fortpj/anzung von Chrysopelea ornata ornatissima English corrections by Graeme Blem

Litteratura SerjJe11ti11111 • 1997 • ,,o/ume 17 • 1111111ber 3 ~