2019 Goose Creek Native Revegetation and Restoration

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2019 Goose Creek Native Revegetation and Restoration 2019 Goose Creek Native Revegetation and Restoration Written by: Joe Dahlke, Katie Fischer, Michaela Fishback, Marissa Lane-Masse, and Steven Pearlman Riparian Restoration Environmental Leadership Program Conducted by the University of Oregon’s 2019 Environmental Leadership Program Website: https://blogs.uoregon.edu/2019riparianrestoration/ Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary……………………………………………………………………….....2 2.0 Introduction: About the Project…….……………………………………………...……….2 2.1 History and Background of Whitewater Ranch…………………………….…………2 2.2 Study Area…………………………………………………………………………….3 3.0 Stewardship Summary……………………………………………………………………....4 4.0 Monitoring Summary………………………………………………………………………..5 4.1 Photopoint Monitoring………………………………………………………………...5 4.2 Individual Plant Monitoring…………………………………………………………...8 4.3 Turtle Monitoring……....…………………………………………………………….12 4.4 Aquatic Macroinvertebrate Monitoring…………..………………………………….12 4.5 Stream Temperature Monitoring……………………………………………………..14 4.6 Pollinator Monitoring……………………………………………………..………….17 4.7 Spotted Wing Drosophila Monitoring….…………...…….…………………………19 5.0 Recommendations…………………………………………………………………………..20 5.1 General……………………………………………………………………………….20 5.2 Photopoint Monitoring……………………………………………………………….20 5.3 Individual Plant Monitoring………………………………………………………….20 5.4 Turtle Monitoring…....……………………………………………………………….21 5.5 Aquatic Macroinvertebrate Monitoring………………………………..…………….21 5.6 Stream Temperature Monitoring……………………………………………………..21 5.7 Pollinator Monitoring….…………………….…………………………………….....22 5.8 Spotted Wing Drosophila Monitoring…….……………...………………………….22 5.9 Planting Plan…….….………………………………………………………………..22 6.0 Future Plant Health and Concerns……………………………………………………......22 6.1 Potential management action………………………………………………………...24 7.0 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………...……...24 8.0 Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………………....25 9.0 References…………………………………………………………………………………...25 10.0 Appendices………………………………...……………………………………………….27 A. Individual Plant Monitoring Plot Map………………………….....……………..27 B. Plant Species List…………….………………………....………………………..27 C. Plant Maps………………….…………………………..…………………….….29 D. Map of Pollinator Transects……………………………………………………...31 E. Stream Temperature UTM and Description of Locations……………...………..32 F. Photopoint UTM Log………………...…………………………………………..34 G. Photopoint Monitoring Archive…………..……………………………………...36 H. Macroinvertebrate collection chart………………………………………………43 1 1.0 Executive Summary This report details the progress of a restoration project carried out at the riparian zone of Goose Creek, a tributary of the McKenzie River, in Leaburg, Oregon. The creek runs through Whitewater Ranch (WWR), a small farm that grows different varieties of blueberries organically, and uses sustainable practices to annually harvest Douglas fir timber. Due to pollution of the creek caused by previous land-owners, the creek was an unstable habitat for native plants and animals. Restoration was first implemented in 2014 and has been monitored and expanded each year since. Monitoring tasks have included tracking the growth of native plantings, resident pollinator populations, temperature changes in the creek, and relative degree of sensitivity of resident macro- invertebrates. Overall, the restoration work has been successful. Native plants have exhibited healthy growth around the creek, providing shade and habitat, and pollinator populations have increased. Other indications of stream health are slower in their progression (such as stream temperature), and are yet to appear to a significant degree. Going forward, restoration tasks should continue to expand down the creek and monitoring should continue to be carried out following any changes to the work currently being done. Fencing should continue to be installed to a greater extent in order to protect the plots, and plantings should be further filled in. 2.0 Introduction: About the Project 2.1 History and Background of Whitewater Ranch Over the past 100 years, alterations to the landscape such as urbanization, intensive agriculture, livestock grazing, building of dams, and the intentional change of stream and river paths by humans have all led to compromised stream banks and ecosystems in riparian zones in the McKenzie River watershed. Before 1885, when the area of land was first inhabited by white settlers, the Kalapuya and Molala peoples inhabited the land near what is now Goose Creek and Leaburg. They used the region as a corridor of travel between the mountains, valley, and the coast, as well as a site of other daily activities until the late 1770s. Over time, the property changed hands a number of times until purchased by the Oregon and California Railroad, where it was then sold to various settlers who raised a variety of different crops, such as wheat and carrots. The earliest record of a settler- colonialist to purchase the property for homesteading was in 1885. The property was first used for dairy production in 1935. In 1949, a change in ownership resulted in the harvest of lumber from the surrounding foothills and grazing of cattle around the lowlands and riparian area. After a number of different sales of the property, 1,800 acres of WWR was finally purchased in 1983 as a family partnership farm growing Christmas trees, raising cattle, and harvesting timber. For a few years the owners tried olive production, but ultimately turned to blueberries as olives did not survive a hard freeze one year. The ranch currently raises 83 acres of organic blueberries, a few dozen acres of Christmas trees, and 1,600 acres of harvestable timber, 2 while replanting the harvested sections of forest. Much of the cattle grazing during WWR’s history removed native vegetation from around Goose Creek, reducing the biodiversity of plants, which ultimately led to the decline in fauna, flora, and the overall stream health of Goose Creek. The current owners of WWR, Jane and Jim Russell, promote and encourage the sustainability and mitigation of impacts of commercial agriculture on their land by not only participating in various certifications fostering sustainability and stewardship, but also by sponsoring a partnership with the University of Oregon’s Environmental Leadership Program. This partnership enables teams of student leaders to restore the riparian zone of Goose Creek that runs through the center of the property adjacent the blueberry fields, which in turn provides habitat for a number of native species (Russell et al. 2018). 2.2 Study Area Figure 1: Map of the study area and surrounding area. Located 5 miles outside of Leaburg, Oregon and 25 miles outside of Eugene, WWR is an 1,800-acre portion of privately-owned land (Figure 1). According to the Köppen climate classification system, it is part of the Western Oregon Cascades lowlands and valleys ecoregion and occupies a warm-summer Mediterranean climate, where the climate is characterized by rainy winters and dry summers (Arnfield, 2009). WWR lies at an elevation of 700 feet above sea level to around 1400 feet above sea level, average summer temperatures range from 48º to 83º F, and average winter temperatures range from 34º to 55º F (Western Regional Climate Center 2016). Average annual precipitation totals 65 inches across an average of 165 days of the year. 3 The farm itself is located on the banks of the McKenzie River, a tributary of the Willamette River. The river drains over a watershed basin of 1,300 square miles, of which 96% is forested, and under 4% is occupied by agricultural or residential use (McKenzie Watershed Council 2010). Goose Creek, the site of our team’s focus, is a stream-fed creek originating in the foothills above the blueberry fields. This portion of the creek provides habitat for native fauna such as cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii), western pond turtles (Actinemys marmorata), beaver (Castor canadensis), mink (Neovison vison), brook lamprey (Entosphenus tridentatus), and several species of macroinvertebrates. The soil at the study area is 84.3% Jimbo silt loam, which is composed of coarse-loamy isotic and mesic soil. This soil type forms in low stream terraces and high floodplains. It possesses a dark, rich color due to the high volume of organic material and its porous composition that allows for drainage and water storage (SoilWeb). Soil such as this aids in the survival and vigor of both native and non-native species. Restoration work at WWR aims to regenerate the native plant species population in order to establish a biodiverse natural environment to support habitat for native species of fauna and flora, and the Russell’s organic farming practices. Plants introduced by past teams to the riparian area include Douglas spiraea (Spiraea douglasii), tall Oregon grape (Berberis aquifolium), Pacific ninebark (Physocarpus capitatus), Oregon ash (Fraxinus latifolia), clustered wild rose (Rosa pisocarpa), mock orange (Philadelphus lewisii), oceanspray (Holodiscus discolor), sitka willow (Salix sitchenis), Red-twig dogwood (Cornus sericea), Snowberry (Symphoricarpos albus) and red-flowering currant (Ribes sanguineum). Other plants historically native to the area include Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), Western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla), red alder (Alnus rubra), big leaf maple (Acer macrophyllum), Western red cedar (Thuja plicata), vine maple (Acer circinatum), trailing blackberry (Rubus ursinus), and Western sword fern (Polystichum munitum). In order to manage the aggressive invasive species that currently dominate the creek, including reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea)
Recommended publications
  • Oregon Invasive Species Action Plan
    Oregon Invasive Species Action Plan June 2005 Martin Nugent, Chair Wildlife Diversity Coordinator Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife PO Box 59 Portland, OR 97207 (503) 872-5260 x5346 FAX: (503) 872-5269 [email protected] Kev Alexanian Dan Hilburn Sam Chan Bill Reynolds Suzanne Cudd Eric Schwamberger Risa Demasi Mark Systma Chris Guntermann Mandy Tu Randy Henry 7/15/05 Table of Contents Chapter 1........................................................................................................................3 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 What’s Going On?........................................................................................................................................ 3 Oregon Examples......................................................................................................................................... 5 Goal............................................................................................................................................................... 6 Invasive Species Council................................................................................................................. 6 Statute ........................................................................................................................................................... 6 Functions .....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Groups of Insects, Mites and Spiders
    List Supplemental Information Content Taxonomic Groups of Insects, Mites and Spiders Pests of trees and shrubs Class Arachnida, Spiders and mites elm bark beetle, smaller European Scolytus multistriatus Order Acari, Mites and ticks elm bark beetle, native Hylurgopinus rufipes pine bark engraver, Ips pini Family Eriophyidae, Leaf vagrant, gall, erinea, rust, or pine shoot beetle, Tomicus piniperda eriophyid mites ash flower gall mite, Aceria fraxiniflora Order Hemiptera, True bugs, aphids, and scales elm eriophyid mite, Aceria parulmi Family Adelgidae, Pine and spruce aphids eriophyid mites, several species Cooley spruce gall adelgid, Adelges cooleyi hemlock rust mite, Nalepella tsugifoliae Eastern spruce gall adelgid, Adelges abietis maple spindlegall mite, Vasates aceriscrumena hemlock woolly adelgid, Adelges tsugae maple velvet erineum gall, several species pine bark adelgid, Pineus strobi Family Tarsonemidae, Cyclamen and tarsonemid mites Family Aphididae, Aphids cyclamen mite, Phytonemus pallidus balsam twig aphid, Mindarus abietinus Family Tetranychidae, Freeranging, spider mites, honeysuckle witches’ broom aphid, tetranychid mites Hyadaphis tataricae boxwood spider mite, Eurytetranychus buxi white pine aphid, Cinara strobi clover mite, Bryobia praetiosa woolly alder aphid, Paraprociphilus tessellatus European red mite, Panonychus ulmi woolly apple aphid, Eriosoma lanigerum honeylocust spider mite, Eotetranychus multidigituli Family Cercopidae, Froghoppers or spittlebugs spruce spider mite, Oligonychus ununguis spittlebugs, several
    [Show full text]
  • Oemona Hirta (Revised)
    EUROPEAN AND MEDITERRANEAN PLANT PROTECTION ORGANIZATION ORGANISATION EUROPEENNE ET MEDITERRANEENNE POUR LA PROTECTION DES PLANTES 15-21045 Pest Risk Analysis for Oemona hirta (revised) September 2014 EPPO 21 Boulevard Richard Lenoir 75011 Paris www.eppo.int [email protected] This risk assessment follows the EPPO Standard PM PM 5/3(5) Decision-support scheme for quarantine pests (available at http://archives.eppo.int/EPPOStandards/pra.htm) and uses the terminology defined in ISPM 5 Glossary of Phytosanitary Terms (available at https://www.ippc.int/index.php). This document was first elaborated by an Expert Working Group and then reviewed by the Panel on Phytosanitary Measures and if relevant other EPPO bodies. Cite this document as: EPPO (2014) Revised Pest risk analysis for Oemona hirta. EPPO, Paris. Available at http://www.eppo.int/QUARANTINE/Pest_Risk_Analysis/PRA_intro.htm Photo:Adult Oemona hirta. Courtesy Prof. Qiua Wang, Institute of Natural Resources, Massey University (NZ) 15-21045 (13-19036, 13-18422, 12-18133) Pest Risk Analysis for Oemona hirta This PRA follows the EPPO Decision-support scheme for quarantine pests PM 5/3 (5). A preliminary draft has been prepared by the EPPO Secretariat and served as a basis for the work of an Expert Working Group that met in the EPPO Headquarters in Paris on 2012-05-29/06-01. This EWG was composed of: Mr John Bain, Scion Forest Protection (New Zealand Forest Research Institute Ltd.), Rotorua, New Zealand Dr Dominic Eyre, Food and Environment Research Agency, York, UK Dr Hannes Krehan, Federal Office, Vienna Institute of Forest Protection, Vienna, Austria Dr Panagiotis Milonas, Benaki Phytopathological Institute, Kifissia, Greece Dr Dirkjan van der Gaag, Plant Protection Service, Wageningen, Netherlands Dr Qiao Wang, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
    [Show full text]
  • PRA on Apriona Species
    EUROPEAN AND MEDITERRANEAN PLANT PROTECTION ORGANIZATION ORGANISATION EUROPEENNE ET MEDITERRANEENNE POUR LA PROTECTION DES PLANTES 16-22171 (13-18692) Only the yellow note is new compared to document 13-18692 Pest Risk Analysis for Apriona germari, A. japonica, A. cinerea Note: This PRA started 2011; as a result, three species of Apriona were added to the EPPO A1 List: Apriona germari, A. japonica and A. cinerea. However recent taxonomic changes have occurred with significant consequences on their geographical distributions. A. rugicollis is no longer considered as a synonym of A. germari but as a distinct species. A. japonica, which was previously considered to be a distinct species, has been synonymized with A. rugicollis. Finally, A. cinerea remains a separate species. Most of the interceptions reported in the EU as A. germari are in fact A. rugicollis. The outcomes of the PRA for these pests do not change. However A. germari has a more limited and a more tropical distribution than originally assessed, but it is considered that it could establish in Southern EPPO countries. The Panel on Phytosanitary Measures agreed with the addition of Apriona rugicollis to the A1 list. September 2013 EPPO 21 Boulevard Richard Lenoir 75011 Paris www.eppo.int [email protected] This risk assessment follows the EPPO Standard PM PM 5/3(5) Decision-support scheme for quarantine pests (available at http://archives.eppo.int/EPPOStandards/pra.htm) and uses the terminology defined in ISPM 5 Glossary of Phytosanitary Terms (available at https://www.ippc.int/index.php). This document was first elaborated by an Expert Working Group and then reviewed by the Panel on Phytosanitary Measures and if relevant other EPPO bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • A Selective Bibliography on Insects Causing Wood Defects in Living Eastern Hardwood Trees By
    Historic, Archive Document Do not assume content reflects current scientific knowledge, policies, or practices. V1 Inited States epartment of .griculture A SELECTIVE Forest Service BIBLIOGRAPHY ON Bibliographies and Literature of Agriculture No. 15 INSECTS CAUSING t»4 WOOD DEFECTS IN LIVING EASTERN HARDWOOD TREES o cr-r m c m TO CO ^ze- es* A Selective Bibliography on Insects Causing Wood Defects in Living Eastern Hardwood Trees by C. John Hay Research Entomologist Forestry Sciences Laboratory Northeastern Forest Experiment Station U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Delaware, Ohio J. D. Solomon Principal Research Entomologist Southern Hardwoods Laboratory Southern Forest Experiment Station U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Stoneville, Miss. Bibliographies and Literature of Agriculture No. 15 U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service July 1981 3 8 Contents Introduction 1 Tylonotus bimaculatus Haldeman, ash and Host Tree Species 2 privet borer 18 Hardwood Borers Xylotrechus aceris Fisher, gallmaking maple borer*. 1 General and miscellaneous species 4 Curculionidae Coleoptera Conotrachelus anaglypticus Say, cambium curculio . 18 General and miscellaneous species 7 Cryptorhynchus lapathi (Linnaeus), poplar-and- Brentidae willow borer* 18 Arrhenodes minutus (Drury), oak timbenvorm* .. 8 Lymexylonidae Buprestidae Melittomma sericeum (Harris), chestnut General and miscellaneous species 9 timbenvorm* 22 Agrilus acutipennis Mannerheim 9 Scolytidae Agrilus anxius Gory, bronze birch borer* 9 General and miscellaneous species
    [Show full text]
  • FIELD GUIDE to DISEASES and INSECTS of QUAKING ASPEN in the WEST Part I: WOOD and BARK BORING INSECTS Brytten E
    United States Department of Agriculture FIELD GUIDE TO DISEASES AND INSECTS OF QUAKING ASPEN IN THE WEST Part I: WOOD AND BARK BORING INSECTS Brytten E. Steed and David A. Burton Forest Forest Health Protection Publication April Service Northern Region R1-15-07 2015 WOOD & BARK BORING INSECTS WOOD & BARK BORING INSECTS CITATION Steed, Brytten E.; Burton, David A. 2015. Field guide to diseases and insects FIELD GUIDE TO of quaking aspen in the West - Part I: wood and bark boring insects. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Health Protection, Missoula DISEASES AND INSECTS OF MT. 115 pp. QUAKING ASPEN IN THE WEST AUTHORS Brytten E. Steed, PhD Part I: WOOD AND BARK Forest Entomologist BORING INSECTS USFS Forest Health Protection Missoula, MT Brytten E. Steed and David A. Burton David A. Burton Project Director Aspen Delineation Project Penryn, CA ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Technical review, including species clarifications, were provided in part by Ian Foley, Mike Ivie, Jim LaBonte and Richard Worth. Additional reviews and comments were received from Bill Ciesla, Gregg DeNitto, Tom Eckberg, Ken Gibson, Carl Jorgensen, Jim Steed and Dan Miller. Many other colleagues gave us feedback along the way - Thank you! Special thanks to Betsy Graham whose friendship and phenomenal talents in graphics design made this production possible. Cover images (from top left clockwise): poplar borer (T. Zegler), poplar flat­ head (T. Zegler), aspen bark beetle (B. Steed), and galls from an unidentified photo by B. Steed agent (B. Steed). We thank the many contributors of photographs accessed through Bugwood, BugGuide and Moth Photographers (specific recognition in United States Department of Agriculture Figure Credits).
    [Show full text]
  • Exotic Bark- and Wood-Boring Coleoptera in the United States: Recent Establishments and Interceptions1
    269 Exotic bark- and wood-boring Coleoptera in the United States: recent establishments and interceptions1 Robert A. Haack Abstract: Summary data are given for the 25 new species of exotic bark- and wood-boring Coleoptera first reported in the continental United States between 1985 and 2005, including 2 Buprestidae (Agrilus planipennis and Agrilus prionurus), 5 Cerambycidae (Anoplophora glabripennis, Callidiellum rufipenne, Phoracantha recurva, Sybra alternans, and Tetrops praeusta), and 18 Scolytidae (Ambrosiodmus lewisi, Euwallacea fornicatus, Hylastes opacus, Hylurgops palliatus, Hylurgus ligniperda, Orthotomicus erosus, Phloeosinus armatus, Pityogenes bidentatus, Scolytus schevyrewi, Tomicus piniperda, Xyleborinus alni, Xyleborus atratus, Xyleborus glabratus, Xyleborus pelliculosus, Xyleborus pfeilii, Xyleborus seriatus, Xyleborus similis, and Xylosandrus mutilatus). In addition, summary interception data are presented for the wood-associated beetles in the families Bostrichidae, Buprestidae, Cerambycidae, Curculionidae, Lyctidae, Platypodidae, and Scolytidae, based on the USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service “Port Information Network” database for plant pests intercepted at US ports of entry from 1985 to 2000. Wood-associated insects were most often intercepted on crating, followed by dunnage and pallets. The five imported products most often associated with these 8341 interceptions were tiles, machinery, marble, steel, and ironware. A significantly higher proportion of the most frequently intercepted true bark beetles
    [Show full text]
  • CRYPTORHYNCHUS LAPATHI (L.) (COLEOPTERA: CURCULIONIDAE) on Sallx SPP
    DISTRIBUTION AND IMPACT OF CRYPTORHYNCHUS LAPATHI (L.) (COLEOPTERA: CURCULIONIDAE) ON SALlX SPP. IN BRITISH COLUMBIA Cynthia L. Broberg B. Sc. (Plant Biology), University of British Columbia, 1997 THESIS SUBMllTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF PEST MANAGEMENT in the Department of Biological Sciences O Cynthia L. Broberg 1999 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY October 1999 All rights reserved. This work may not be repmduced in whole or in part. by photocopy or other means. without permission of the author. National Library Bibliothèque nationale du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie Services sewices bibliographiques 395 Wdüngîori Street 395, rue Wellington ûtîawaON KIAON4 ûttawa ON KIA ON4 Cariada Canadtt The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence allowing the exclusive permettant à la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or seil reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microfonn, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/nlm, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts fiom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or othenivise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. Abstract The poplar and willow borer, Cryptorhynchus lapathi (L.), known to be present in British Columbia since 1923, primarily attacks species of Salk and Populus.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Climate for Conservation Nature, Carbon and Climate Change in British Columbia
    A New Climate for Conservation Nature, Carbon and Climate Change in British Columbia Dr. Jim Pojar A NEW CLIMATE FOR CONSERVATION Commissioned by the Working Group on Biodiversity, Forests and Climate, an alliance of ENGOs, including: B.C. Spaces for Nature Th e Land Trust Alliance of B.C. Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society West Coast Environmental Law David Suzuki Foundation Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative ForestEthics CPAWS Graphic design and production by Roger Handling, Terra Firma Digital Arts. Cover photo credits: Paul Colangelo (main image); (top to bottom) Evgeny Kuzmenko, Sandra vom Stein, Robert Koopmans; (people) Aaron Kohr. January 2010 Th e Working Group on Biodiversity, Forests and Climate gratefully acknowledges fi nancial support from the Wilburforce Foundation, the Bullitt Foundation, the Real Estate Foundation of British Columbia, Patagonia Inc. and Tides Canada Exchange Fund of Tides Canada Foundation, in the preparation of this report. 2 | Nature, Carbon and Climate Change in British Columbia A NEW CLIMATE FOR CONSERVATION Acknowledgements Th is report was commissioned by the Working Group on Biodiversity, Forests and Climate, an alliance of Environmental Non-governmental Organizations (ENGOs) including: B.C. Spaces for Nature, Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society, David Suzuki Foundation, ForestEthics, Land Trust Alliance of B.C., West Coast Environmental Law, and Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative. Forest Ecologist Dr. Jim Pojar, who prepared the report, has extensive professional experience in applied conservation biology, forest ecology, sustainable forest management, ecological land classifi cation, and conservation, with a wealth of fi eld experience throughout British Columbia. Th e hope is that this synthesis of scientifi c information (on primarily terrestrial ecosystems) will be an important contribution to the current rethinking of nature conservation and climate action planning in British Columbia.
    [Show full text]
  • Braconid Parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) on Poplars and Aspen (Populus Spp.) in Serbia and Montenegro
    NORTH-WESTERN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY 9 (2): 264-275 ©NwjZ, Oradea, Romania, 2013 Article No.: 131205 http://biozoojournals.3x.ro/nwjz/index.html Braconid parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) on poplars and aspen (Populus spp.) in Serbia and Montenegro Vladimir ŽIKIĆ1,*, Saša S. STANKOVIĆ1, Marijana ILIĆ1 and Nickolas G. KAVALLIERATOS2 1. Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, Department of Biology and Ecology, University of Niš, Višegradska 33, 18000 Niš, Serbia. 2. Laboratory of Agricultural Entomology, Department of Entomology & Agricultural Zoology, Benaki Phytopathological Institute; 8 Stefanou Delta str., 145 61 Kifissia, Attica, Greece. *Corresponding author, V. Žikić, E-mail: [email protected] Received: 02. February 2012 / Accepted: 20. June 2012 / Available online: 16. February 2013 / Printed: December 2013 Abstract. This is the first report of the trophic associations of Braconidae on pest insects on poplars in Serbia and Montenegro. Fifty-two braconid species from 29 genera, classified into 12 subfamilies are reported. We have recorded 58 hosts, mainly holometabolous insects from Coleoptera, Diptera, Hymenoptera and Lepidoptera, and Hemiptera as a hemimetabolous order, found on 12 poplar taxa. The total number of tritrophic associations is 114. Key words: Braconidae, tritrophic associations, pests, southeastern Europe. Introduction Pannonian lowland that serves to decrease strong wind in that area. In this region of Europe, which As an important group of natural enemies, Braco- encompasses Serbia, Hungary and Romania, vari- nidae represents one of the major groups of para- ous herbivorous or xylophagous insects directly sitoids attacking other insects, usually in their lar- attack leaves, bark or roots of poplar trees, and val stage, but also eggs and adults (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Isolation and Identification of Bacteria from Four Important Poplar Pests
    Revista Colombiana de Entomología 43 (1): 34-37 (Enero - Junio 2017) Notas científicas / Scientific notes Isolation and identification of bacteria from four important poplar pests Aislamiento e identificación de bacterias de algunas plagas de álamo MUSTAFA YAMAN1, ÖMER ERTÜRK2, SABRI ÜNAL3 and FAZIL SELEK1 Abstract: In this study, the bacterial flora of important poplar pests was studied. This includedCryptorhynchus lapathi (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), Sciapteron tabaniformis (Lepidoptera: Sesiidae), Nycteola asiatica (Lepidoptera: Noli- dae) and Gypsonoma dealbana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). The final goal was to propose alternative ecological control agents for poplar pests and decrease the undesirable effects caused by chemical pesticides in urban areas and urban forests. Forty-three bacteria were isolated from the larvae and adults exhibiting characteristic disease symptoms of these pests in five different localities for the first time. All bacterial isolates were cultured and identified using VITEK bacterial identification systems (VITEK® 2 GN ID card prod. no; 21341 and VITEK® 2 GP ID card prod. no; 21342, bioMerieux, Marcy l’Etoile). The members of the genera from Bacillaceae and Enterobacteriaceae families were most commonly isolated from both pest insects. Key words: Entomopathogenic bacteria. Biological control. Turkey. Resumen: Se registra el estudio de la flora bacteriana de cuatro importantes plagas de álamo, Cryptorhynchus lapathi (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), Sciapteron tabaniformis Rott (Lepidoptera: Sesiidae), Nycteola asiatica (Lepidoptera: Nolidae) y Gypsonoma dealbana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) en la búsqueda de agentes de control ecológicamente al- ternativos contra las plagas del álamo y disminuir los efectos indeseables causados por los plaguicidas químicos en el área urbana y los bosques urbanos. Se aislaron e identificaron cuarenta y tres bacterias de las larvas y adultos de estas plagas a partir de cinco localidades diferentes.
    [Show full text]
  • Prediction of the Long-Term Potential Distribution of Cryptorhynchus Lapathi (L.) Under Climate Change
    Article Prediction of the Long-Term Potential Distribution of Cryptorhynchus lapathi (L.) under Climate Change Ya Zou 1 , Linjing Zhang 1,2 , Xuezhen Ge 3, Siwei Guo 1 , Xue Li 1, Linghong Chen 4, Tao Wang 5 and Shixiang Zong 1,* 1 Key Laboratory of Beijing for the Control of Forest Pests, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China; [email protected] (Y.Z.); [email protected] (L.Z.); [email protected] (S.G.); [email protected] (X.L) 2 Institution of Remote Sensing and Information System Application, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou City 310058, China 3 Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada; [email protected] 4 College of Environment and Resources, Jilin University, Changchun City 130012, China; [email protected] 5 Mentougou Forestry Station, Beijing 102300, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 12 November 2019; Accepted: 16 December 2019; Published: 18 December 2019 Abstract: The poplar and willow borer, Cryptorhynchus lapathi (L.), is a severe worldwide quarantine pest that causes great economic, social, and ecological damage in Europe, North America, and Asia. CLIMEX4.0.0 was used to study the likely impact of climate change on the potential global distribution of C. lapathi based on existing (1987–2016) and predicted (2021–2040, 2041–2080, and 2081–2100) climate data. Future climate data were simulated based on global climate models from Coupled Model Inter-comparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) under the RCP4.5 projection. The potential distribution of C. lapathi under historical climate conditions mainly includes North America, Africa, Europe, and Asia. Future global warming may cause a northward shift in the northern boundary of potential distribution.
    [Show full text]