EPPO Reporting Service
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Clave De Perforadores De Coníferas 04
Clave de Perforadores de Coníferas Orden: Coleoptera. Suborden: Polyphaga Superfamilia: Curculionoidea. Familias: Scolytidae y Curculionidae CONSEJERÍA DE MEDIO AMBIENTE ESPECIES: Escolítidos y Curculiónidos, “barrenillos de la madera” y “gorgojos”, respectivamente. Las que presentan un mayor potencial patógeno dentro de Andalucía son los escolítidos Tomicus destruens (Wollaston,1865) y Orthotomicus erosus (Wollaston, 1857) ESPECIES AFECTADAS: Principalmente Coníferas DAÑOS: Se alimentan de la parte subcortical de los árboles que colonizan, provocándoles la muerte ya que al desarrollarse las larvas impiden el flujo de savia y agua. Ficha Resumen DISTRIBUCIÓN: La clave trata sobre especies existentes en la Comunidad Autónoma de Andalucía. ■ CURIOSIDADES: Con la alimentación de las larvas se graba en la madera una serie de galerías que son características y casi exclusivas de cada especie de perforador. 04 INTRODUCCIÓN medidas correctoras mas convenientes para redu- cir la densidad de las poblaciones de perforado- Los perforadores son coleópteros de peque- res hasta el umbral de tolerancia deseado. ño tamaño (no superan los 10 mm de longitud), de colores oscuros, negros o castaños. Son vola- A la hora de llevar a cabo la identificación de dores, y poseen una gran capacidad de disper- un individuo será necesario conocer sus caracte- sión. rísticas morfológicas, pero también es muy útil y Desarrollan su ciclo reproductor sobre los en muchos casos determinante saber que hábitos pies muertos que mantienen su madera húmeda, tienen y donde los desarrollan. En muchos casos sobre los enfermos o debilitados por sequías, por conocer esos hábitos determinará claramente que ataque de otras plagas, etc. Estos insectos son especie es la causante de los daños. -
Fungi Associated with Three Common Bark Beetle Species in Norwegian
Preface Finally, two years of study for the master degree at the Norwegian University of Life Science is completed. This thesis is the end of my education in forestry science. It has been a long and sometimes challenging journey, but this is it. It started as a “worst case scenario”, when I had to change my thesis assignment. Two months of fieldwork resulted in nothing due to unlucky circumstances. I was saved by the hero Dr. Halvor Solheim who is my main supervisor. He came up with the idea of study fungi associated with some bark beetle species. This thesis has given me the opportunity to practice and learn about new fields, that I thought I never would bother to try to understand. I’ve been working with tree samples, beetle species and DNA! Normally I was the one who usually prayed, that DNA wouldn’t be a subject in the examinations. In additions to Dr. Halvor Solheim, many people have inspired, helped and motivated me through the whole process. They have answered all my questions and have been there for me when I needed help. Dr. Paal Krokene for advisements and borrowing out literature. Senior Engineers Helge Meissner and Anne Eskild Nilsen for instructions and advising in the biochemistry lab. Senior Research Scientist Ari M. Hietala for advising me about the laboratory methods and the writing process. Lead Engineer Inger M. Heldal for advisements and mixing of different solutions, such as primers and enzymes. Lead Engineer Gro Wollebæk for the advisements and instructions for the laboratory work. Scientific Adviser Torstein Kvamme for assisting with the fieldwork, beetle identification and comments on the manuscript. -
Invasion of an Inconspicuous Ambrosia Beetle and Fungus
1 Invasion of an inconspicuous ambrosia beetle and 2 fungus may alter wood decay in Southeastern North 3 America 4 5 Jiri Hulcr1,2, James Skelton1, Andrew J. Johnson1, You Li1, Michelle A. Jusino1,3 6 7 1 School of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA 8 2 Entomology and Nematology Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA 9 3 Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA 10 11 Corresponding Author: 12 Jiri Hulcr1 13 UF/IFAS School of Forest Resources and Conservation, PO Box 110410, Gaiensville, FL, 14 32611, USA 15 Email address: [email protected] 16 17 Abstract 18 Background. Ambrosia beetles include well-known invasive pests, but most species established 19 in non-native areas do not cause any significant impact. Here we report the recent invasion and 20 rapid spread of Ambrosiodmus minor in the Southeastern US. 21 Methods: We used a combination of a multi-year survey, literature data on fungal symbionts 22 from the beetle mycangia and in vitro bioassays of fungal competition, and extensive field 23 observations of wood colonization patterns. 24 Results. In less than seven years, A. minor abundance has increased many-fold in Florida. The 25 beetle is associated with an aggressive wood-rot fungus Flavodon ambrosius. Joint colonization 26 of wood by A. minor and F. ambrosius results in extensive white rot (lignin removal). The 27 invasion of this symbiosis may impact an ecosystem function previously considered not 28 influenced by non-native ambrosia beetles: wood decay. We suggest monitoring of the impact of 29 this invasion on native wood-inhabiting organisms, biomass degradation and the carbon cycle 30 throughout the region. -
Pu'u Wa'awa'a Biological Assessment
PU‘U WA‘AWA‘A BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT PU‘U WA‘AWA‘A, NORTH KONA, HAWAII Prepared by: Jon G. Giffin Forestry & Wildlife Manager August 2003 STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF FORESTRY AND WILDLIFE TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE ................................................................................................................................. i TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................. ii GENERAL SETTING...................................................................................................................1 Introduction..........................................................................................................................1 Land Use Practices...............................................................................................................1 Geology..................................................................................................................................3 Lava Flows............................................................................................................................5 Lava Tubes ...........................................................................................................................5 Cinder Cones ........................................................................................................................7 Soils .......................................................................................................................................9 -
The Beetle Fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and Distribution
INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 20, No. 3-4, September-December, 2006 165 The beetle fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and distribution Stewart B. Peck Department of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada stewart_peck@carleton. ca Abstract. The beetle fauna of the island of Dominica is summarized. It is presently known to contain 269 genera, and 361 species (in 42 families), of which 347 are named at a species level. Of these, 62 species are endemic to the island. The other naturally occurring species number 262, and another 23 species are of such wide distribution that they have probably been accidentally introduced and distributed, at least in part, by human activities. Undoubtedly, the actual numbers of species on Dominica are many times higher than now reported. This highlights the poor level of knowledge of the beetles of Dominica and the Lesser Antilles in general. Of the species known to occur elsewhere, the largest numbers are shared with neighboring Guadeloupe (201), and then with South America (126), Puerto Rico (113), Cuba (107), and Mexico-Central America (108). The Antillean island chain probably represents the main avenue of natural overwater dispersal via intermediate stepping-stone islands. The distributional patterns of the species shared with Dominica and elsewhere in the Caribbean suggest stages in a dynamic taxon cycle of species origin, range expansion, distribution contraction, and re-speciation. Introduction windward (eastern) side (with an average of 250 mm of rain annually). Rainfall is heavy and varies season- The islands of the West Indies are increasingly ally, with the dry season from mid-January to mid- recognized as a hotspot for species biodiversity June and the rainy season from mid-June to mid- (Myers et al. -
Oregon Invasive Species Action Plan
Oregon Invasive Species Action Plan June 2005 Martin Nugent, Chair Wildlife Diversity Coordinator Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife PO Box 59 Portland, OR 97207 (503) 872-5260 x5346 FAX: (503) 872-5269 [email protected] Kev Alexanian Dan Hilburn Sam Chan Bill Reynolds Suzanne Cudd Eric Schwamberger Risa Demasi Mark Systma Chris Guntermann Mandy Tu Randy Henry 7/15/05 Table of Contents Chapter 1........................................................................................................................3 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 What’s Going On?........................................................................................................................................ 3 Oregon Examples......................................................................................................................................... 5 Goal............................................................................................................................................................... 6 Invasive Species Council................................................................................................................. 6 Statute ........................................................................................................................................................... 6 Functions ..................................................................................................................................................... -
A Baseline Invertebrate Survey of the Knepp Estate - 2015
A baseline invertebrate survey of the Knepp Estate - 2015 Graeme Lyons May 2016 1 Contents Page Summary...................................................................................... 3 Introduction.................................................................................. 5 Methodologies............................................................................... 15 Results....................................................................................... 17 Conclusions................................................................................... 44 Management recommendations........................................................... 51 References & bibliography................................................................. 53 Acknowledgements.......................................................................... 55 Appendices.................................................................................... 55 Front cover: One of the southern fields showing dominance by Common Fleabane. 2 0 – Summary The Knepp Wildlands Project is a large rewilding project where natural processes predominate. Large grazing herbivores drive the ecology of the site and can have a profound impact on invertebrates, both positive and negative. This survey was commissioned in order to assess the site’s invertebrate assemblage in a standardised and repeatable way both internally between fields and sections and temporally between years. Eight fields were selected across the estate with two in the north, two in the central block -
Movement of Plastic-Baled Garbage and Regulated (Domestic) Garbage from Hawaii to Landfills in Oregon, Idaho, and Washington
Movement of Plastic-baled Garbage and Regulated (Domestic) Garbage from Hawaii to Landfills in Oregon, Idaho, and Washington. Final Biological Assessment, February 2008 Table of Contents I. Introduction and Background on Proposed Action 3 II. Listed Species and Program Assessments 28 Appendix A. Compliance Agreements 85 Appendix B. Marine Mammal Protection Act 150 Appendix C. Risk of Introduction of Pests to the Continental United States via Municipal Solid Waste from Hawaii. 159 Appendix D. Risk of Introduction of Pests to Washington State via Municipal Solid Waste from Hawaii 205 Appendix E. Risk of Introduction of Pests to Oregon via Municipal Solid Waste from Hawaii. 214 Appendix F. Risk of Introduction of Pests to Idaho via Municipal Solid Waste from Hawaii. 233 2 I. Introduction and Background on Proposed Action This biological assessment (BA) has been prepared by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) to evaluate the potential effects on federally-listed threatened and endangered species and designated critical habitat from the movement of baled garbage and regulated (domestic) garbage (GRG) from the State of Hawaii for disposal at landfills in Oregon, Idaho, and Washington. Specifically, garbage is defined as urban (commercial and residential) solid waste from municipalities in Hawaii, excluding incinerator ash and collections of agricultural waste and yard waste. Regulated (domestic) garbage refers to articles generated in Hawaii that are restricted from movement to the continental United States under various quarantine regulations established to prevent the spread of plant pests (including insects, disease, and weeds) into areas where the pests are not prevalent. -
Insect Feeding on Sugarcane Smut in Hawaii1 2
CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by ScholarSpace at University of Hawai'i at Manoa Vol. XXII, No. 3, December, 1977 451 Insect Feeding on Sugarcane Smut in Hawaii1 2 P. A. Bowler\ E. E. Trujillch, and J. W. Beardsley, Jr.* The insect fauna associated with sugarcane smut whips is not well understood. Although various insects have been reported (Hayward, 1943), only Phalacrus immarginatus Champion has been well documented as a predator feeding on chlamydospores (Agarwal, 1956). In India this species spends its entire life cycle on the host plant; within smut whips during development (egg and larva) and on the leaves when mature. Extensive insect damage to smut whips on rattoon crops and older stands with secondary lateral whip formation was observed in experimental plots of infected sugarcane in Hawaii. The smut fungus, Ustilago scitaminea Syd., is a recent accidental introduction to the Hawaiian Islands (Byther, Steiner, and Wismer, 1971), and this study was undertaken as one of a series of investigations of dispersal and mechanical vectors of the disease. Materials and Methods To assess the extent of insect damage to smut whips, fifty whips in each of three approximately one-half acre plots were examined and insect damage was recorded. Insects captured on whips were dissected after being cleaned with repeated ethanol wipes, and their viscera were microscopically observed to determine if chlamydospores were present. Representatives of species containing spores were eviscerated and their stomach contents were plated on the smut selective medium of Anderson and Trujillo (1975). The smut selective medium is prepared with 200 ml. -
2019 Goose Creek Native Revegetation and Restoration
2019 Goose Creek Native Revegetation and Restoration Written by: Joe Dahlke, Katie Fischer, Michaela Fishback, Marissa Lane-Masse, and Steven Pearlman Riparian Restoration Environmental Leadership Program Conducted by the University of Oregon’s 2019 Environmental Leadership Program Website: https://blogs.uoregon.edu/2019riparianrestoration/ Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary……………………………………………………………………….....2 2.0 Introduction: About the Project…….……………………………………………...……….2 2.1 History and Background of Whitewater Ranch…………………………….…………2 2.2 Study Area…………………………………………………………………………….3 3.0 Stewardship Summary……………………………………………………………………....4 4.0 Monitoring Summary………………………………………………………………………..5 4.1 Photopoint Monitoring………………………………………………………………...5 4.2 Individual Plant Monitoring…………………………………………………………...8 4.3 Turtle Monitoring……....…………………………………………………………….12 4.4 Aquatic Macroinvertebrate Monitoring…………..………………………………….12 4.5 Stream Temperature Monitoring……………………………………………………..14 4.6 Pollinator Monitoring……………………………………………………..………….17 4.7 Spotted Wing Drosophila Monitoring….…………...…….…………………………19 5.0 Recommendations…………………………………………………………………………..20 5.1 General……………………………………………………………………………….20 5.2 Photopoint Monitoring……………………………………………………………….20 5.3 Individual Plant Monitoring………………………………………………………….20 5.4 Turtle Monitoring…....……………………………………………………………….21 5.5 Aquatic Macroinvertebrate Monitoring………………………………..…………….21 5.6 Stream Temperature Monitoring……………………………………………………..21 5.7 Pollinator Monitoring….…………………….…………………………………….....22 5.8 Spotted Wing Drosophila -
Terrestrial Arthropod Surveys on Pagan Island, Northern Marianas
Terrestrial Arthropod Surveys on Pagan Island, Northern Marianas Neal L. Evenhuis, Lucius G. Eldredge, Keith T. Arakaki, Darcy Oishi, Janis N. Garcia & William P. Haines Pacific Biological Survey, Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Hawaii 96817 Final Report November 2010 Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Pacific Islands Fish & Wildlife Office Honolulu, Hawaii Evenhuis et al. — Pagan Island Arthropod Survey 2 BISHOP MUSEUM The State Museum of Natural and Cultural History 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, Hawai’i 96817–2704, USA Copyright© 2010 Bishop Museum All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America Contribution No. 2010-015 to the Pacific Biological Survey Evenhuis et al. — Pagan Island Arthropod Survey 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... 5 Background ..................................................................................................................... 7 General History .............................................................................................................. 10 Previous Expeditions to Pagan Surveying Terrestrial Arthropods ................................ 12 Current Survey and List of Collecting Sites .................................................................. 18 Sampling Methods ......................................................................................................... 25 Survey Results .............................................................................................................. -
Taxonomic Groups of Insects, Mites and Spiders
List Supplemental Information Content Taxonomic Groups of Insects, Mites and Spiders Pests of trees and shrubs Class Arachnida, Spiders and mites elm bark beetle, smaller European Scolytus multistriatus Order Acari, Mites and ticks elm bark beetle, native Hylurgopinus rufipes pine bark engraver, Ips pini Family Eriophyidae, Leaf vagrant, gall, erinea, rust, or pine shoot beetle, Tomicus piniperda eriophyid mites ash flower gall mite, Aceria fraxiniflora Order Hemiptera, True bugs, aphids, and scales elm eriophyid mite, Aceria parulmi Family Adelgidae, Pine and spruce aphids eriophyid mites, several species Cooley spruce gall adelgid, Adelges cooleyi hemlock rust mite, Nalepella tsugifoliae Eastern spruce gall adelgid, Adelges abietis maple spindlegall mite, Vasates aceriscrumena hemlock woolly adelgid, Adelges tsugae maple velvet erineum gall, several species pine bark adelgid, Pineus strobi Family Tarsonemidae, Cyclamen and tarsonemid mites Family Aphididae, Aphids cyclamen mite, Phytonemus pallidus balsam twig aphid, Mindarus abietinus Family Tetranychidae, Freeranging, spider mites, honeysuckle witches’ broom aphid, tetranychid mites Hyadaphis tataricae boxwood spider mite, Eurytetranychus buxi white pine aphid, Cinara strobi clover mite, Bryobia praetiosa woolly alder aphid, Paraprociphilus tessellatus European red mite, Panonychus ulmi woolly apple aphid, Eriosoma lanigerum honeylocust spider mite, Eotetranychus multidigituli Family Cercopidae, Froghoppers or spittlebugs spruce spider mite, Oligonychus ununguis spittlebugs, several