DOCSLIB.ORG

BELGIUM Local Single Sky Implementation Level 1 - Implementation Overview

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

of ATM Implementation Reporting 25YEARS in Europe EUROCONTROL LSSIP 2018 - BELGIUM Local Single Sky ImPlementation Level 1 - Implementation Overview Document Title LSSIP Year 2018 for Belgium Infocentre Reference 19/02/05/06 Date of Edition 18/06/19 LSSIP Focal Point Antoine Vincent [email protected] LSSIP Contact Person Valerie Oblin - [email protected] Status Released Intended for Agency Stakeholders Available in https://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip Reference Documents LSSIP Documents https://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip LSSIP Guidance https://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip Material Master Plan Level 3 – https://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/european-atm-master-plan-level-3- Plan Edition 2018 implementation-plan Master Plan Level 3 – https://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/european-atm-master-plan-level-3- Report Year 2018 implementation-report European ATM Portal https://www.eatmportal.eu and http://www.atmmasterplan.eu/ STATFOR Forecasts https://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor Acronyms and https://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/content/documents/official- abbreviations documents/guidance/Glossaries.pdf National AIP https://ops.skeyes.be/html/skeyes_static/eaip/eAIP_Main/html/index-en- GB.html (restricted access) FAB Performance Plan http://www.fabec.eu/fabec_homepage/en/Performance/Performance%20Plan/ LSSIP Year 2018 Belgium Released Issue APPROVAL SHEET The following authorities have approved all parts of the LSSIP Year 2018 document and their signature confirms the correctness of the reported information and reflects their commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan – Edition 2018. Stakeholder / Name Position Signature Organisation BCAA P. Vanheyste, by Director General replacement for a.i. Eugeen Van Craeyvelt skeyes Johan Decuyper Chief Executive Officer Defence M. Compernol Chief of Defence General Brussels Airport A. Feist Chief Executive Company Office No signature received from skeyes for the 2018 Belgium LSSIP document. LSSIP Year 2018 Belgium Released Issue CONTENTS 1. National ATM Environment ............................................................ 6 Geographical Scope ............................................................................................ 6 National Stakeholders ........................................................................................ 9 2. Traffic and Capacity ...................................................................... 19 Evolution of traffic in Belgium .......................................................................... 19 ACC Brussels ..................................................................................................... 20 3. Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report conclusions ............. 25 4. Implementation Projects .............................................................. 26 National projects .............................................................................................. 26 FAB projects ..................................................................................................... 27 Regional projects .............................................................................................. 29 5. Cooperation activities .................................................................. 30 FAB Co-ordination ............................................................................................ 30 Regional cooperation ....................................................................................... 30 6. Implementation Objectives Progress ........................................... 32 State View......................................................................................................... 32 Detailed Objectives Implementation progress ................................................ 38 Annexes Specialists involved in the ATM implementation reporting for Belgium National stakeholders’ organisation charts Implementation Objectives’ links with SESAR, ICAO and DP Glossary of abbreviations Mature SESAR Solutions not associated to an Implementation Objective LSSIP Year 2018 Belgium Released Issue Executive Summary National ATM Context The main national stakeholders involved in Air Traffic Management (ATM) in Belgium are the Federal Public Service (FPS) Mobility and Transport, skeyes, the Ministry of Defence and Brussels Airport Company. The Maastricht Upper Area Control Centre is providing ANS in the upper airspace of Belgium above FL 245 and is subject to a dedicated LSSIP document. FPS Mobility and Transport is responsible for civil aviation in Belgium through the (Belgian) Civil Aviation Authority (BCAA), which is the Belgian Regulatory Authority. The National Supervisory Authority (NSA), as per Single European Sky (SES) Service Provision Regulation, is the Belgian Supervisory Authority – Air Navigation Service (BSA-ANS), a service within the BCAA. skeyes is the Air Navigation Service (ANS) Provider in the Brussels Flight Information Region / Upper Flight Information Region (FIR/UIR) below FL 245. There is a full separation between skeyes and the BCAA. Since March 2005, a 5 year management contract between skeyes and the Belgian State lays down the obligations of skeyes. The 3rd management contract is enforced by the Royal decree of 25 April 2014. The Ministry of Defence (MoD) is responsible for the military aviation in Belgium. The MoD plays a major role in managing and controlling parts of the airspace and acts as a Regulatory Authority as well as an airspace user and an Air Navigation Service (ANS) Provider. The separation of Regulatory Authority Service Provision is assured within the separate functions in the organization. Airspace matters, in particular, are dealt with in the Belgian Airspace and Navigation Committee (BELANC). Co-ordination between the MoD (Air Component), skeyes and BCAA is mainly dealt within the BELANC and the Committee of Directors (DIRCOM). The principal Airports in Belgium, besides Brussels Airport (EBBR), are Antwerp (EBAW), Liège (EBLG), Charleroi (EBCI), Oostende (EBOS) and Kortrijk (EBKT). The main Belgian airport is EBBR, operated by Brussels Airport Company. Traffic and Capacity Traffic in Belgium increased by 3.1% during Summer 2018 (May to October), when compared to the same period during 2017. The EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast predicts an average annual increase between 0.6% and 3.2%, with a baseline growth of 1.9% during the planning cycle. LSSIP Year 2018 Belgium 1 Released Issue Progress per SESAR Phase The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements. The percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant objectives as shown in Chapter 6 (PCP objectives are marked as such, the rest are considered SESAR baseline); note that three objectives – AOM19.1 and FCM05 – are considered as both part of the SESAR baseline and PCP so their progress contributes to the percentage of both phases. The objectives declared ‘Achieved’ in previous editions (up to, and including, ATM MP L3 Edition 2011-2017) are also taken into account for as long as they were linked to the Level 2 of the ATM Master Plan and implemented by the State. Pre-SESAR 2010 2019 Implementation 78% PCP 2015 2023 Implementation 29% Progress per SESAR Key Feature and Phase The figure below shows the progress made so far, per SESAR Key Feature, in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements. The percentages are calculated as an average, per Key Feature, of the same objectives as in the previous paragraph. Advanced Air Enabling Aviation Optimised ATM Traffic Services High Performing Infrastructure Network Services Airport Operations 86% 87% 72% 67% 52% 37% 0% 9% PCP PCP PCP PCP SESAR SESAR SESAR SESAR - - - - Pre Pre Pre Pre LSSIP Year 2018 Belgium 2 Released Issue ICAO ASBUs Progress Implementation The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the ICAO ASBUs Blocks 0 and 1. The overall percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant Objectives contributing to each of the relevant ASBUs; this is a summary of the table explained in Chapter 6. 2010 2018 Block 0 82% 2015 2022 Block 1 30% ATM Deployment Outlook State objectives - STAM Phase 1 Deployed in 2017-2018: [FCM04.1] 100% progress By 12/2019 By 12/2020 By 12/2021 2022+ - OAT and GAT handling - Surveillance Performance - Interactive Rolling NOP - RNAV 1 for TMA [AOM13.1] 97% progress & Interoperability [FCM05] 36% progress Operations - 8,33 kHz below FL195 [ITY-SPI] 89% progress [NAV03.1] 98% progress [ITY-AGVCS2] 95% progress - Mandatory Coordination - Collaborative Flight - APV Procedures & Transfer Planning [NAV10] 94% progress [ITY-COTR] 73% progress [FCM03] 45% progress - Aeronautical Information - Aircraft Identification - Voice over IP [ITY-ADQ] 89% progress [ITY-ACID] 52% progress [COM11] 30% progress - ASM Tools - ASM/ATFCM process - Coordination and [AOM19.1] 85% progress [AOM19.3] 50% progress transfer - Real-Time Airspace Data - STAM Phase 2 [ATC17] 24% progress [AOM19.2] 63% progress [FCM04.2] 30% progress - SWIM Yellow TI Profile - eTOD [INF08.1] 1% progress [INF07] 41% progress - Extended Flight Plan - Traffic Complexity [FCM08] 0% progress [FCM06] 30% progress - NewPENS [COM12] 13% progress - AMAN to en-route [ATC15.1] 0% progress LSSIP Year 2018 Belgium 3 Released Issue ● Airport objectives - EBBR - Brussels Airport - Collaborative Env. Mgt. Deployed in 2017-2018: [ENV02] % progress By 12/2019 By
Recommended publications
  • Runway Performance Report 2020

    Runway Performance Report 2020

    Ostend Airport RUNWAY PERFORMANCE REPORT 2020 member of FABEC / www.skeyes.be EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Air Traffic Management (ATM) Performance is Looking at the distribution of traffic per runway, it driven by four Key Performance Areas (KPAs): safety, can be seen that 2020 follows the trends of 2017 and capacity, environment and cost-efficiency. This 2019, with runway 26 being preferentially used. 2018 report focuses on skeyes’ operations at Ostend- was a year with more north-easterly winds recorded Bruges International Airport (International Civil at all Belgian airports, implying a more frequent use Aviation Organization (ICAO) code EBOS). Its aim is of runway 08. In 2020, winds blew predominantly to provide our main stakeholders with traffic figures from the South-West, with an exception for the for 2020 and relevant data on the performance of our months of April and May where more easterly winds operations at Ostend Airport, namely on three of the were registered and the use of runway 26 dropped to four KPA’s: safety, capacity and environment. around 40% (being on average at 71% for the whole year). Traffic Safety The year 2020 will be remembered for the breakout of the coronavirus COVID-19 pandemic, which Three topics are presented in this report: greatly impacted aviation. Low records of traffic were missed approaches, runway incidents, such registered in Ostend-Bruges International Airport, as runway incursions, and improvements and with an average drop of 25% in comparison with 2019. recommendations. Regarding the first matter, Furthermore, in April 2020, during the COVID-19 first Ostend Airport registered 11 missed approaches wave, a reduction in flights of 76% was seen in the overall in 2020, ten on runway 26 and one on runway airport.
  • Internship Programme GUIDE for NEWCOMERS

    Internship Programme GUIDE for NEWCOMERS

    Internship Programme GUIDE FOR NEWCOMERS Internship Programme GUIDE FOR NEWCOMERS 2017 Internship Programme GUIDE FOR NEWCOMERS 4 Internship Programme GUIDE FOR NEWCOMERS TABLE OF CONTENTS Welcome Note from the Secretary General ............................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 8 1. ABOUT THE INTERNSHIP PROGRAMME ..................................................................................................................................................................... 10 A. Background ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 11 B. General Conditions ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 12 C. Proceduress ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
  • Runway Performance Report 2020

    Runway Performance Report 2020

    Brussels Airport RUNWAY PERFORMANCE REPORT 2020 member of FABEC / www.skeyes.be EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Air Traffic Management (ATM) Performance is Safety driven by four Key Performance Areas (KPAs): safety, capacity, environment and cost-efficiency. This Two types of events are analysed in this report, both report focuses on skeyes’ operations at Brussels giving a view on airport safety performance: missed Airport (ICAO code EBBR). Its aim is to provide our approaches and runway incursions (RI). Overall, main stakeholders with traffic figures for 2020 and 2020 has seen a decrease in terms of missed relevant data on the performance of the operations approaches by 49%. Even though the number at EBBR, namely on three of four KPA’s: safety, of arrivals has decreased by nearly 60%, capacity and environment. an increase of 25% in the rate of missed approaches per 1,000 arrivals has been registered. The reasons The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in significant for rates to increase were various: low level social and economic impacts throughout the world. of traffic, single runway operations where one (1) Many countries, including Belgium, decided to of the three (3) runways was used simultaneously, impose a variety of measures in order to prevent the three (3) storms that occurred in February 2020, spread of the COVID-19 pandemic. Those measures Northeast wind in April and May and/or closure of mainly affected people movements which eventual- RWY 07L/25R due to the runway renovation works. ly lead to unprecedented levels of disruption In 2020 the most common reason for missed in countries throughout the world.
  • VFE Workshop Final Report

    VFE Workshop Final Report

    FABEC Vertical Flight Efficiency (VFE) Workshop Report 10 December 2020 Maastricht UAC / Online virtual meeting DOCUMENT SUMMARY Objective: A workshop with FABEC ANSPs and industry stakeholders (mainly aircraft operators) to discuss vertical flight efficiency, to exchange views and to explore how to improve VFE and new VFE indicators. Origin: FABEC SC ENV Audience: Members of the FABEC ANSP teams along with representatives from NM, airlines, CFSPs. Title : FABEC Vertical Flight Efficiency Workshop Reference: FABEC VFE Workshop Report v1.0 Version : 1.0 Date : 12/02/2021 Status : Classification : Public FABEC limited Draft Addressees Released limited DOCUMENT CHANGE RECORD Version Date Changes Author 0.1 15/01/2021 Draft Jean-Michel Edard & Alexander Vanwelsenaere 0.2 21/01/2021 Amendments Nadine Meesen 0.3 11/02/2021 Amendments Theo Hendriks, David Brain, Michaël Sanczuk, Sophie Baranes, Robert Sklorz 1.0 12/02/2021 Jean-Michel Edard APPROVALS Approved Approved by Approval date Approval outcome version and reference 1.0 Ilona Sitova 12/02/2021 1.1 FX Prach 12/02/2021 2020-12-10-FABEC_VFE_ Workshop_Report_v1.1.docx - 10 Dec 2020 2 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 4 2 Agenda ................................................................................................................................ 5 3 Attendees ...........................................................................................................................
  • ARMENIA LOCAL SINGLE SKY IMPLEMENTATION Level2019 1 - Implementation Overview

    ARMENIA LOCAL SINGLE SKY IMPLEMENTATION Level2019 1 - Implementation Overview

    EUROCONTROL LSSIP 2019 - ARMENIA LOCAL SINGLE SKY IMPLEMENTATION Level2019 1 - Implementation Overview Document Title LSSIP Year 2019 for Armenia Info Centre Reference 20/01/15/02 Date of Edition 01/04/2020 LSSIP Focal Point Samvel Baghdasaryan - [email protected] – ARMATS LSSIP Contact Person Octavian Cioară - [email protected] EUROCONTROL / NMD/INF/PAS LSSIP Support Team [email protected] Status Released Intended for Agency Stakeholders Available in https://www.eurocontrol.int/service/local-single-sky- implementation-monitoring Reference Documents LSSIP Documents https://www.eurocontrol.int/service/local-single-sky- implementation-monitoring Master Plan Level 3 – Plan Edition https://www.eurocontrol.int/publication/european-atm- 2019 master-plan-implementation-plan-level-3-2019 Master Plan Level 3 – Report Year https://www.eurocontrol.int/publication/european-atm- 2019 master-plan-implementation-report-level-3-2019 European ATM Portal https://www.atmmasterplan.eu/ STATFOR Forecasts https://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor National AIP Request should be sent to e-mail: [email protected] FAB Performance Plan Request should be sent to e-mail: [email protected] LSSIP Year 2019 Armenia - Level 1 Released Issue APPROVAL SHEET The following authorities have approved all parts of the LSSIP Year 2019 document and the signatures confirm the correctness of the reported information and reflect the commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 (Implementation View) – Edition 2019.
  • MUAC AO AIRAC Brief Maastricht Upper Area Control Centre

    MUAC AO AIRAC Brief Maastricht Upper Area Control Centre

    MUAC AO AIRAC Brief Maastricht Upper Area Control Centre MUAC AO AIRAC 2107 Brief – 15-07-2021 Introduction The MUAC AO AIRAC Brief informs AOs and CFSPs about significant changes in routeings and RAD restrictions in the MUAC airspace. It does not supersede the official publication of AIP or RAD; it rather aims to provide complementary information regarding some changes which affect flight planning in the MUAC airspace. This Brief includes a summary of changes which become effective on AIRAC 15-07-2021. New FRA intermediate waypoint OTMEC Maastricht UAC creates the new FRA Intermediate waypoint OTMEC at position 520403N 0054946E in the Southeast of The Netherlands. Its main purpose is circumnavigation of the military areas EHTRA12Z and EHTRA12AZ. At the same time, five other FRA intermediate waypoints are withdrawn: RENDI, ARNEM, ELPAT, NAPRO, TEBRO. Since the new point OTMEC is located at an ideal position for all flows, the nearby waypoints which were previously used in the legacy ATS-Route structure before being converted to FRA points, have become redundant. Following segments are recommended via OTMEC: Southeast Bound Upstream towards OTMEC Downstream after OTMEC REDFA L620 TACHA DCT OTMEC OTMEC DCT COL LAMSO DCT EVELI DCT OTMEC OTMEC DCT PODIP TOPPA DCT OTMEC OTMEC DCT GMH TOPPA DCT AMGOD DCT OTMEC (when EHD09Z is reserved) OTMEC DCT NOMKA Westbound Upstream towards OTMEC Downstream after OTMEC MAPOX L604 BIGGE DCT OTMEC OTMEC DCT NOGRO KEMAD DCT DOMEG DCT OTMEC OTMEC DCT ABNED KUMER DCT OTMEC OTMEC DCT GALSO LARET DCT OTMEC OTMEC DCT NIGUG POVEL DCT OTMEC OTMEC DCT SOMVA HLZ DCT OTMEC HLZ L980 DLE DCT OTMEC (DEP EDDB) BATEL DCT OTMEC ROBEG DCT OTMEC RKN DCT OTMEC MUAC AO AIRAC Brief Maastricht Upper Area Control Centre MUAC AO AIRAC Brief Maastricht Upper Area Control Centre New FRA intermediate waypoint EMMUN Maastricht UAC creates the new FRA Intermediate waypoint EMMUN at position 524000N 0070200E in the East of The Netherlands.
  • EUROCONTROL History Book December 2010

    EUROCONTROL History Book December 2010

    EUROCONTROL History Book December 2010 By John McInally Head of Organisational Development 1991 - 2010 EUROCONTROL Table of content Introduction 5 Executive summary 9 History of EUROCONTROL - Timeline 1910-2008 17 Part 1 1958-1966 25 Genesis of EUROCONTROL, original vision, sovereignty defined Part 2 1966-1986 75 EUROCONTROL continues with revised/reduced mandate Part 3 1986-1997 119 Amended Convention proves insufficient, matse takes key decisions, EUROCONTROL acts to revise Convention Part 4 1997-2008 191 Early Implementation, EUROCONTROL Adapts to Single European Sky, Growing Concentration on the Network Annex 1 Presidents and Vice-Presidents of the Permanent Commission 293 Annex 2 Presidents and Vice-Presidents of the Committee of management 295 Annex 3 Directors General of the Agency 298 Annex 4 Presidents and Vice-Presidents of the Provisional Council 299 Annex 5 Chairmen of the Civil-military Coordination Committee and military ATm Board 300 Annex 6 Ratification of the revised Convention 301 3 Introduction Introduction This History is a description of the key institutional, legal and organisational events and decisions that have determined the progress of the EUROCONTROL Organisation and its Agency through the past fifty years. It is a record, in one document, of the circumstances surrounding these events and the nature of the performance of EUROCONTROL against what was required of it. Who makes up the audience for this history? It is principally aimed at those past and present Eurocontrollers, including State representatives, as well as those who have been involved with EUROCONTROL at different times through the consultation groups and working arrangements. The reader should note therefore that this is a “History”.
  • LSSIP 2019 - BELGIUM LOCAL SINGLE SKY IMPLEMENTATION Level2019 1 - Implementation Overview

    LSSIP 2019 - BELGIUM LOCAL SINGLE SKY IMPLEMENTATION Level2019 1 - Implementation Overview

    EUROCONTROL LSSIP 2019 - BELGIUM LOCAL SINGLE SKY IMPLEMENTATION Level2019 1 - Implementation Overview Document Title LSSIP Year 2019 for Belgium Info Centre Reference 20/01/15/05 Date of Edition 25/06/19 LSSIP Focal Point Antoine Vincent [email protected] Federal Public Service Mobility and Transport LSSIP Contact Person Valerie Oblin - [email protected] EUROCONTROL / NMD/INF/PAS LSSIP Support Team [email protected] Status Released Intended for Agency Stakeholders Available in https://www.eurocontrol.int/service/local-single-sky- implementation-monitoring Reference Documents LSSIP Documents https://www.eurocontrol.int/service/local-single-sky-implementation- monitoring Master Plan Level 3 – Plan https://www.eurocontrol.int/publication/european-atm-master-plan- Edition 2019 implementation-plan-level-3-2019 Master Plan Level 3 – Report https://www.eurocontrol.int/publication/european-atm-master-plan- Year 2019 implementation-report-level-3-2019 European ATM Portal https://www.atmmasterplan.eu/ STATFOR Forecasts https://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor National AIP https://ops.skeyes.be/html/belgocontrol_static/eaip/eAIP_Main/html /index-en-GB.html FAB Performance Plan http://www.fabec.eu/fabec_homepage/en/Performance/Performanc e%20Plan/ LSSIP Year 2019 Belgium- Level 1 Released Issue APPROVAL SHEET The following authorities have approved all parts of the LSSIP Year 2019 document and the signatures confirm the correctness of the reported information and reflect the commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 (Implementation View) – Edition 2019. No signature received from skeyes for the 2019 Belgium LSSIP document LSSIP Year 2019 Belgium- Level 1 Released Issue TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ...........................................................................................
  • “Gissing”: Hisgis Analysis for Mapping Urban Transformation and Military Reuse of Suppressed Convents in Brussels, Antwerp and Bruges (1773-1860)

    “Gissing”: Hisgis Analysis for Mapping Urban Transformation and Military Reuse of Suppressed Convents in Brussels, Antwerp and Bruges (1773-1860)

    en 364From guessing to “gissing”: HisGIS analysis for mapping urban transformation and military reuse of suppressed convents in Brussels, Antwerp and Bruges (1773-1860) Reinout Klaarenbeek Thomas Coomans Processing data with GIS The secularisation of all monastic properties at the end of the 18th century 365 caused a remarkable metamorphosis of urban space in Belgium. Large numbers of monastic complexes, material witnesses of a society entrenched by the Catholic religion for centuries, were erased from the townscape and replaced by new urban fabric. This process, however, was gradual and far from complete. Many former monasteries survived to a certain extent, as they were reused by state and urban institutions (e.g. charities, schools, prisons, hospitals, barracks, etc.) as well as private actors (industries and housing). Taking the case of military reuse as an example, this article de- scribes how this transformation process can be mapped using historical GIS. Historical GIS, or HisGIS, is the application of geographic information science Introduction in the field of history. Although this marriage between GIS and history has sometimes been received with scepticism,1 a large and growing number of studies in the field of urban history have shown its value: most importantly, HisGIS is able to map historical sources, thereby adding a hitherto neglected geographical dimension to historical explanations.2 Furthermore, HisGIS makes it possible to use location as a central means of collecting, storing and combining a wide range of historical sources.3 In this contribution, the design and application of HisGIS are described for a problem at the interface of urban history, architectural history, and historical geography: the urban transformation that occurred after the suppression of convents in the late 18th-century Belgian cities.
  • Integrated Air Traffic Management July 2020

    Integrated Air Traffic Management July 2020

    Draft proposal for a European Partnership under Horizon Europe Integrated Air Traffic Management July 2020 Summary Digital transformation of ATM, making the European airspace the most efficient and environmentally friendly sky to fly in the world, supporting the competitiveness and recovery of the European aviation sector in a post-COVID crisis Europe. Key areas: improving connectivity, air-ground integration and automation, increasing resilience and scalability of airspace management, safe integration of autonomous vehicles. Deliver by 2030 the solutions identified in the European ATM Master Plan for Phase D at TRL 6 while significantly increasing market uptake for a critical mass of early movers focusing on Phase C and D infrastructure modernisation priorities. 1 About this draft In autumn 2019 the Commission services asked potential partners to further elaborate proposals for the candidate European Partnerships identified during the strategic planning of Horizon Europe. These proposals have been developed by potential partners based on common guidance and template, taking into account the initial concepts developed by the Commission and feedback received from Member States during early consultation1. The Commission Services have guided revisions during drafting to facilitate alignment with the overall EU political ambition and compliance with the criteria for Partnerships. This document is a stable draft of the partnership proposal, released for the purpose of ensuring transparency of information on the current status of preparation (including on the process for developing the Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda). As such, it aims to contribute to further collaboration, synergies and alignment between partnership candidates, as well as more broadly with related R&I stakeholders in the EU, and beyond where relevant.
  • Brussels 1 Brussels

    Brussels 1 Brussels

    Brussels 1 Brussels Brussels • Bruxelles • Brussel — Region of Belgium — • Brussels-Capital Region • Région de Bruxelles-Capitale • Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest A collage with several views of Brussels, Top: View of the Northern Quarter business district, 2nd left: Floral carpet event in the Grand Place, 2nd right: Brussels City Hall and Mont des Arts area, 3rd: Cinquantenaire Park, 4th left: Manneken Pis, 4th middle: St. Michael and St. Gudula Cathedral, 4th right: Congress Column, Bottom: Royal Palace of Brussels Flag Emblem [1] [2][3] Nickname(s): Capital of Europe Comic city Brussels 2 Location of Brussels(red) – in the European Union(brown & light brown) – in Belgium(brown) Coordinates: 50°51′0″N 4°21′0″E Country Belgium Settled c. 580 Founded 979 Region 18 June 1989 Municipalities Government • Minister-President Charles Picqué (2004–) • Governor Jean Clément (acting) (2010–) • Parl. President Eric Tomas Area • Region 161.38 km2 (62.2 sq mi) Elevation 13 m (43 ft) [4] Population (1 January 2011) • Region 1,119,088 • Density 7,025/km2 (16,857/sq mi) • Metro 1,830,000 Time zone CET (UTC+1) • Summer (DST) CEST (UTC+2) ISO 3166 BE-BRU [5] Website www.brussels.irisnet.be Brussels (French: Bruxelles, [bʁysɛl] ( listen); Dutch: Brussel, Dutch pronunciation: [ˈbrʏsəɫ] ( listen)), officially the Brussels Region or Brussels-Capital Region[6][7] (French: Région de Bruxelles-Capitale, [ʁe'ʒjɔ̃ də bʁy'sɛlkapi'tal] ( listen), Dutch: Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest, Dutch pronunciation: [ˈbrʏsəɫs ɦoːft'steːdələk xəʋɛst] ( listen)), is the capital
  • SWIM Success Stories – Moving Towards Implementation

    SWIM Success Stories – Moving Towards Implementation

    SESAR SWIM Success Stories – Moving towards implementation What was a high-level concept a few years ago, system wide information management (SWIM) is now becoming a reality! The four editions of the SESAR SWIM Master Class have largely contributed to progressing SWIM concepts and standards into advanced prototypes and solutions in all ATM areas such as meteorological information, airport operations, extended arrival management, the integration of remotely-piloted aircraft systems, etc. This remarkable achievement could only happen with the involvement of dedicated pioneers. Discover here a selection of these SWIM success stories. More stories are welcome! 1 Table of Contents 37TATOS37T ....................................................................................................................................................................3 37TAVITECH37T .............................................................................................................................................................5 37TEUMETNET37T ........................................................................................................................................................7 37TEUROCONTROL 37T ............................................................................................................................................ 10 37TFREQUENTIS37T .................................................................................................................................................. 14 37TIDS37T ....................................................................................................................................................................