DOCSLIB.ORG

Provincial Aquaculture Development Project (Lao/97/007)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Provincial Aquaculture Development Project (Lao/97/007) FI: DP/LAO/97/007 STS - Field Document No. 8 DEPARTMENT OF LIVESTOCK AND FISHERIES FISHERIES DIVISION PROVINCIAL AQUACULTURE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (LAO/97/007) MID TERM EVALUATION REPORT MAIN REPORT SEPTEMBER 1999 BY MR. BRETT TAN DR. HANH CHOUNDARA MR. HANS GUTTMAN Executive summary The introduction of fish culture has great potential for the improvement of nutrition and increased income for the rural farmers in Lao PDR. The Project builds on the lessons learnt from the previous aquaculture development project and focuses in five target provinces with the inclusion of institutional capacity strengthening and human resource development of both the government staff and the village community. The Project, nationally executed, utilises existing government mechanism and emphasises effective extension interface between the district technicians and selected fish farmers. It has been successful in its pragmatic people-centred consultative approach in responding to their perceived needs, instead of applying strict scientific solutions. The provincial capacity in providing technical and management supports to the district has been the Project major priority item. Examples of concrete and potential accomplishment at the national level include: · successful try-out of a transferable aquaculture development technology that is within the capability of the fish farmers to adopt, · substantial increase in awareness in the target and adjacent provinces through the development and dissemination of aquaculture extension materials, · first-time establishment of a comprehensive aquaculture training programme that forms the basis of the aquaculture extension appropriate to the unique condition of rural Lao PDR, · establishment of a linked process of fry production, fingerling distribution and table-fish production through providing supports to state hatcheries and private smallholders. The Project, however, suffers from inadequate clarity and lack of focus in the Project Document on the “process” approach to be adopted. The main inadequacy has been a lack of a cohesive implementation framework with clear and concise goal, objectives, purposes, indicators and expected outputs that the Project team can rely on. Instead, the Project team was forced to follow a set of pre-defined activities. With the aquaculture technology proven, the Project now has the opportunity to focus more on the capacity building of the government staff and strengthening the management of the farmers groups by analysing and sharing the experiences with other active projects in the region. Mission’s recommendations stress this aspect and also urge to: · further develop and support a self-sustaining farmers group network specialising in fry production and nursing, · provide further intensive training in project management to the provincial and district staff, · study the specific aspects of the national natural resource and water resource legislation and the land allocation policy, · explore the prospect of utilising aquaculture as the entry point for integrated rural development activities, · develop documentation in the form of notes or guides from stakeholder analysis and consultative approaches at the field level, as part of the national aquaculture extension programme. 1 The Project will enter the last year of implementation without the in-house technical backstopping of the ADA and UNV’s, the mission recommends an arrangement of a periodic technical/management backstopping mission and an establishment of a participatory impact monitoring and evaluation system based on RRA and development of a concise logical framework matrix (suggested in Annex D) to be put in place by the end of 1999. 2 Table of contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................................1 I. INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................................................................7 II. MAJOR FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................................................................8 II.1 PROJECT .........................................................................................................................................................................8 II.1.1 Technology............................................................................................................................................................8 II.1.2 Design....................................................................................................................................................................8 II.1.3 Entry Point for Integrated Rural Development..............................................................................................8 II.1.4 Project Implementation......................................................................................................................................9 II.1.5 Process Documentation......................................................................................................................................9 II.1.6 Target Group........................................................................................................................................................9 II.2 NATIONAL EXECUTION (NEX) ..................................................................................................................................10 II.2.1 Ownership.......................................................................................................................................................... 10 II.2.2 Procurement...................................................................................................................................................... 10 II.3 CENTRAL GOVERNMENT ...........................................................................................................................................10 II.3.1 Post-ADA/UNV Technical Support............................................................................................................... 10 II.3.2 Post-Project Commitment............................................................................................................................... 10 II.4 PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT ......................................................................................................................................11 II.4.1 Attitude............................................................................................................................................................... 11 II.4.2 Project Management........................................................................................................................................ 12 II.5 DISTRICT LEVEL..........................................................................................................................................................12 II.5.1 Extension............................................................................................................................................................ 12 II.5.2 Innovativeness................................................................................................................................................... 12 II.6 FARMER GROUPS........................................................................................................................................................13 II.6.1 Group Development......................................................................................................................................... 13 II.6.2 Group Strengthening........................................................................................................................................ 13 II.6.3 Small Equipment............................................................................................................................................... 13 II.6.4 Public Relation................................................................................................................................................. 13 II.6.5 Central Emergency Fund................................................................................................................................ 14 II.6.6 Credit & Loan................................................................................................................................................... 14 II.7 GENDER AND ETHNIC ISSUES....................................................................................................................................14 II.7.1 Sharing of Responsibility................................................................................................................................ 14 II.7.2 Exclusion............................................................................................................................................................ 14 II.7.3 Ethnicity............................................................................................................................................................. 15 II.8 INTER-PROJECT CO-ORDINATION.............................................................................................................................15 II.8.1 Multi-disciplinary Approach .......................................................................................................................... 15 II.8.2 RDC
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Naming of Traditional Rice Varieties by the Farmers of Laos S
    CHAPTER 10 Naming of traditional rice varieties by the farmers of Laos S. Appa Rao, J.M. Schiller, C. Bounphanousay, A.P. Alcantara, and M.T. Jackson The collection of traditional rice varieties from throughout Laos, together with a sum- mary of the diversity observed and its conservation, has been reviewed in Chapter 9 of this monograph. While undertaking the collection of germplasm samples from 1995 to early 2000, information was collected from farmers on the special traits and significance of the different varieties, including the vernacular names and their mean- ings. Imperfect as literal translations might be, the names provide an insight into the diversity of the traditional rice varieties of Laos. Furthermore, the diversity of names can, when used with care, act as a proxy for genetic diversity. When collecting started, variety names were recorded in the Lao language and an agreed transliteration into English was developed. The meanings of the variety names were obtained from all possible sources, but particularly from the farmers who donated the samples, together with Lao extension officers and Lao research staff members who understood both Lao and English. Variety names were translated literally, based on the explanations provided by farmers. For example, the red color of glumes is often described in terms of the liquid from chewed betel leaf, which is dark red. Aroma is sometimes indicated by the names of aromatic flowers like jasmine or the response to the aroma that is emitted by the grain of particular varieties during cooking. This chapter provides a summary of the information collected on the naming of traditional Lao rice varieties.
    [Show full text]
  • Lao People's Democratic Republic United Nations Development Programme
    ສາທາລະນະລດັ ປະຊາທິປະໄຕ ປະຊາຊນົ ລາວ ອງົ ການສະຫະປະຊາຊາດເພ� ອການພດັ ທະນາ Lao People's Democratic Republic United Nations Development Programme Government of Lao People’s Democratic Republic Executing Entity/Implementing Partner: Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, MAF, Vientiane, Lao PDR Implementing Entity/Responsible Partner: National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute, NAFRI United Nations Development Programme Analysis of conditions for Farmer Organizations and Cooperatives from a viewpoint of Climate Change Adaptation and Resilience, and recommendations for improvements Project ID:00076176 / ATLAS Award ID 60492 Improving the Resilience of the Agriculture Sector in Lao PDR to Climate Change Impacts (IRAS Lao Project) Project Contact : Mr. Khamphone Mounlamai, Project Manager Email Address : [email protected] EDITED VERSION - 23/11/2012 Disclaimer The views, analysis and opinions expressed in this report are those of the author at the time of the study implementation. They should not be interpreted as representing views or position of IRAS project, UNDP or any other government institution, international organization or project. IRAS Laos Project Analysis of conditions for Farmer Organizations and Cooperatives from a viewpoint of Climate Change Adaptation and Resilience, and recommendation for improvements Table of Content Table of Content ................................................................................................................................. i I. Project Information and Resources .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Thematic Interpretation Plan Savannakhet Province Lao People's Democratic Republic
    Thematic Interpretation Plan Savannakhet Province Lao People’s Democratic Republic GMS-Sustainable Tourism Development Project in Lao PDR Lao National Tourism Administration Prepared by: Linda Susan McIntosh, PhD Candidate Thematic Interpretation and Textile Specialist 33 Soi 1 Sukhumvit Road Klongtoey-nua, Wattana What is Thematic Interpretation? Thematic Interpretation is the practice of verbal and non-verbal communication, using illustrated and non-illustrated techniques to present complex subject matter in an interesting and engaging way. One model of Thematic Interpretation is TORE™ = Thematic, Organized, Relevant, and Enjoyable “Successful interpretation provokes people to think. Their thinking creates meanings in their own minds. Themes can stay with us, even when we forget the smaller facts that support them. Strong themes stick in our minds, some of them forever”. Themes, because they are whole ideas, are expressed in the same form as information already stored in our minds. So when we communicate a theme effectively we give visitors something they can readily relate, self-appropriate, and incorporate into their thinking. Themes are ideas not topics: Examples of Themes: An Example of a Topic: • Birds are a fascinating group of animals • Birds because of their special adaptations for flight. • Native birds everywhere are in a fight for their lives because of overdevelopment and Having a theme helps us prepare educational and promotional materials. It makes our job a lot easier because with a theme we able to understand what to include and not include in a presentation to visitors. 2 SAVANNAKHET HISTORIC TRAIL - Background The SAVANNAKHET HISTORIC TRAIL is a new tour circuit consisting of historic, cultural and natural attractions, situated along the East-West Corridor in Savannakhet Province, Lao PDR.
    [Show full text]
  • 25-6 Drainage System
    Final Report The Study on Vientiane Water Supply Development Project Figure 25-6 Drainage System Legend River, Canal, Trench, Natural Swamp Planned Drain Cannal Reservoir Irrigation Canal Thatluang Irrigation Pumping Station Swamp Boundary of Master Plan Source: Vientiane Urban Development Master Plan, Urban Research Institute, MCTPC 2 - 43 Final Report The Study on Vientiane Water Supply Development Project 2.5.3 GDP Projection An accurate long-term projection of the GDP is necessary for formulating the future framework of the socio-economic structure in the project sites. Official economic projections in “Five-year National Development Plan 2001-2005” and “Long-term Development Plan 2001-2020” were described in Section 5.1. The Five-year Plan has a more specific projection that includes sectoral scenarios, but the “Long-term Plan” shows overall targets for the year 2020. In this study, then, the future projections are based on the “Five-year Plan” projection scenario. The criteria for the projection are assumed as follows. (1) That major sectors grow at the following annual rates until 2005 as proposed in the “Five-year Plan”: 4.5% in the agricultural sector, 10.5% in the industrial sector, 8.5% in the services sector and a 7.0% rise from import duties. As a result, the GDP is expected to grow at 7.0% per annum on average during the planned period. (2) That after 2005, the respective sectors grow at the same rates as set in the “Five-year Plan” until the target year 2020. The GDP projected with the above assumptions are shown in Table 25-1.
    [Show full text]
  • Revealing the Hidden Effects of Land Grabbing Through Better Understanding of Farmers’ Strategies in Dealing with Land Loss
    *Title page with author details Revealing the hidden effects of land grabbing through better understanding of farmers’ strategies in dealing with land loss Diana Suhardiman (corresponding author) International Water Management Institute (IWMI) Southeast Asia Regional Office P.O. Box 4199 Vientiane, Lao PDR Phone: +856-20-77488425 Email: [email protected] Mark Giordano Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service Georgetown University ICC 511 | 37th & O Streets NW, Washington, DC 20057 Email: [email protected] Oulavanh Keovilignavong International Water Management Institute (IWMI) Southeast Asia Regional Office P.O. Box 4199 Vientiane, Lao PDR Email: [email protected] Touleelor Sotoukee International Water Management Institute (IWMI) Southeast Asia Regional Office P.O. Box 4199 Vientiane, Lao PDR Email: [email protected] Highlights (for review) Highlights The forces behind land concession and their connection to land policy are examined Farmers use different strategies to cope with land loss relying on their assets Understanding these strategies is eminent for agrarian transformation processes *Manuscript without author identifiers Click here to view linked References Revealing the hidden effects of land grabbing through better understanding of farmers’ strategies in dealing with land loss Abstract This article examines changing contexts and emerging processes related to “land grabbing.” In particular, it uses the case of Laos to analyze the driving forces behind land takings, how such drivers are implied in land policies, and how affected people respond depending on their socio-economic assets and political connections. We argue that understanding the multiple strategies farmers use to deal with actual land loss and the risk of losing land is crucial to understanding the hidden effects of land grabbing and its potential consequences for agricultural development and the overall process of agrarian transformation.
    [Show full text]
  • Investments in Urban Water Supply 1999 – 2014
    68608 Public Disclosure Authorized Lao People’s Democratic Republic Water Supply and Sanitation Sector Review Public Disclosure Authorized Final dated December 15, 2010 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Sustainable Development Department East Asia and Pacific Region This volume is a product of the staff of the World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views of the Board of Executive Directors of the World Bank or the governments they represent. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective September 13, 2010) Currency Unit = Lao Kip (LAK) LAK 1,000 = US$0.122 LAK 8,196.7 = US$1 FISCAL YEAR October 1 – September 30 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ADB Asian Development Bank NPNL Nampapa Nakhon Luang AFD Agence Française de NPSEs Nam Papa State Enterprises Developpement NRW Non revenue water BOT Build-Operate-Transfer NSEDP National Socio-Economic DHO District Health Office Development Plan DHUP Department of Housing and NT Nam Theun Urban Planning NUSDSIP National Urban Sector DPWT Department of Public Works Development Strategy and and Transportation Investment Plan GDP Gross Domestic Product O&M Operation and Maintenance GFS Gravity Fed System OBA Output-Based Aid GRET Group of Research and ODA Official Development Technological Exchange Assistance HH Households PM Decree Prime Minister Decree IMT Implementation and PPP Public-Private Partnership Maintenance Team PRF Poverty Reduction Fund IWG Infrastructure Working Group SNV Netherlands Development JICA
    [Show full text]
  • CBD Fourth National Report
    LAO PEOPLE’S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC PEACE INDEPENDENCE DEMOCRACY UNITY PROSPERITY FOURTH NATIONAL REPORT TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY SEPTEMBER 2010 PREFACE The government of Lao PDR acceded the United Nations for Convention on Biological Diversity (UNCBD) in 1996 and committed itself, as part of its obligations as party (signatory), to develop National Reports to the Convention. In June 2004 the Lao PDR National Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 and Action Plan to 2010 was completed (submitted to the CBD Secretariat in January 2006). The National Biodiversity Strategy has as the overall goal to “Maintain the diverse biodiversity as one key to poverty alleviation and protect the current asset base of the poor” and identified seven main objectives and seven programme areas for implementation to achieve this goal. The goals and objectives of the National Biodiversity Strategy relate indirectly to the targets of the Convention, but are adapted to the Lao context. Therefore, the current Lao PDR 4 th National Report to the Convention reports mainly on the Lao progress towards the specific targets related to the Convention, rather than the goals of the National Biodiversity Strategy. Nonetheless, the Lao PDR 4 th National Report will, besides from reporting on Lao PDR’s contribution to the Convention, also provide an important baseline for subsequent reports, as well as a foundation for the assessment of the 1st National Biodiversity Action Plan, and for the development of a 2 nd Action Plan, and a possible revision of the National Biodiversity Strategy. On behalf of the Government of Lao, I would like to thank all contributing stakeholders, in particular the GMS National Secretariat (WREA) for preparing the first draft, the Department of Forestry (MAF) and Department of Environment (WREA) for taking the work further to a complete report with the technical support from IUCN Lao PDR, and to the ASEAN Centre for Biodiversity (ACB) for technical and financial support and The Agro-Biodiversity Initiative (TABI) for financial support.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report Project Developing Improved Farming & Marketing Systems in Rainfed Regions of Southern Lao PDR
    Final report project Developing Improved Farming & Marketing Systems in Rainfed Regions of Southern Lao PDR project number CSE/2009/004 date published December 2015 prepared by Prof Len Wade, Dr Tamara Jackson, Ms Jenny Locker, Ms Sarah Boothey Dr Bounthong Bouahom, Dr Pheng Sengxua, Dr Ben Samson, Mr Viengsavanh co-authors/ Phimphachanvongsod, Dr Tassilo Tiemann, Dr Thavone Inthavong, Associate contributors/ Professor Phil Eberbach, Associate Professor Rob Cramb, Dr Silinthone Sacklockam, collaborators Mr Thongchanh Sengsourivong, Mr John Smith, Ms Jessica Armstrong, Dr Chanthakhone Boulaphanh, Mr Brian Dunn, Dr Stephan Haefele, Mr Dome Harnpichitvitaya, Ms Mayouly Hongsathilath, Mr Kongsackda Ketty, Mr Souksamlane Khampoumee, Mr Khamsouk, Mr John Lacey, Dr Ruben Lampayan, Dr Vongphaphanh Manivong, Dr Jono Newby, Mr Khampou Phouyavong, Ms Soulyphone Sidavong, Mr Vorachith Sihathep, Mr Saysathith Souliyavongsa, Mr Khammone Thiravong, Dr Leigh Vial, Mr Somsammai Vongthilath, Mr Sisavanh Vorlason, Dr Camilla Vote, Mr Sisavanh Xayavong, Dr Ketema Zeleke final report number FR2016-04 ISBN 978-1-925436-27-3 published by ACIAR GPO Box 1571 Canberra ACT 2601 Australia This publication is published by ACIAR ABN 34 864 955 427. Care is taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this publication. However ACIAR cannot accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the information or opinions contained in the publication. You should make your own enquiries before making decisions concerning your interests. © Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) XXXX - This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from ACIAR, GPO Box 1571, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia, [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Ffective Water Management and Water Harvesting in Support of Agriculture Adaptation to Climate Change Jeanny Wang Miles – Water Budget Estimation Report
    IRAS Laos Project Effective Water Management and Water Harvesting in support of Agriculture Adaptation to Climate Change Jeanny Wang Miles – Water Budget Estimation Report ສາທາລະນະລດັ ປະຊາທິປະໄຕ ປະຊາຊນົ ລາວ ອງົ ການສະຫະປະຊາຊາດເພ� ອການພດັ ທະນາ Lao People's Democratic Republic United Nations Development Programme Government of Lao People’s Democratic Republic Executing Entity/Implementing Partner: Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, MAF Vientiane, Lao PDR Implementing Entity/Responsible Partner: National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute, NAFRI United Nations Development Programme Report 1 : Water Budget Estimation for Agricultural Communities in Laos Project ID:00076176 / ATLAS Award ID 60492 Improving the Resilience of the Agriculture Sector in Lao PDR to Climate Change Impacts (IRAS Lao Project) Project Contact : Mr. Khamphone Mounlamai, Project Manager Email Address : [email protected] i IRAS Laos Project Effective Water Management and Water Harvesting in support of Agriculture Adaptation to Climate Change Jeanny Wang Miles – Water Budget Estimation Report Effective water management and water harvesting in support to agriculture adaptation to climate change (AA2CC) Prepared by -Jeanny Wang Miles March 3, 2013 ii IRAS Laos Project Effective Water Management and Water Harvesting in support of Agriculture Adaptation to Climate Change Jeanny Wang Miles – Water Budget Estimation Report Table of Contents Executive Summary – English ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The People and Their River
    The People and Their River A Survey of River-Based Livelihoods in the Xe Bang Fai River Basin in Central Lao PDR By Bruce Shoemaker, Ian G. Baird and Monsiri Baird Lao PDR/Canada Fund for Local Initiatives Vientiane, Lao PDR 15 November 2001 Table of Contents Executive Summary - Lao Language (available in hardcopy book) - English Language ..........................................................................................................i Map Introduction and Background ...................................................................................................... 1 - Methodology ................................................................................................................ 1 The Xe Bang Fai River Basin and the Survey Area ................................................................... 3 The Ebb and Flow of the Xe Bang Fai River .............................................................................. 5 The People of the Xe Bang Fai Basin .......................................................................................... 6 River-based Livelihoods................................................................................................................. 9 1. Fisheries ........................................................................................................................ 9 - Fish Migrations and River Fisheries ...................................................................... 9 - Fishing Methods .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ANNEX 7 Keng Houat LACP
    Land Acquisition and Compensation Report September 2017 Lao People’s Democratic Republic: Greater Mekong Subregion East-West Economic Corridor Agriculture Infrastructure Sector Project Prepared by the Department of Irrigation, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry and the Asian Development Bank. This land acquisition and compensation report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. ANNEX 7 Land Acquisition and Compensation Plan Keng Houat Subproject (Revised – September 2017) Prepared by National Project Management Office Agriculture Infrastructure Sector Project Annex 7 Draft Feasibility Study Keng Houat Subproject Land Acquisition and Compensation Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Selected Acronyms iii Executive Summary ................................................................................................. 5 1.1 The Project ...................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Subproject Keng Houat ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Water Supply Management in Urban Areas in Laos
    Water Supply Management in urban areas in Laos A Comparative Study of Ground Water and Surface Water in an Economic, Financial and Environmental Perspective MARIA FORSELL KJERSTIN LUDVIG A Minor Field Study Examensarbete 2004:11 Preface PREFACE BY THE SUPERVISORS Water supply in the Mekong Region is to a large extent based on water resources that are exposed to significant risks and the security of both surface and groundwater supplies are in many cases poor. Although surface water is more common as a supply source, groundwater is assumed to play an increasingly large role in the future, due to low treatment costs and local accessibility. Based on the Dublin Principles and the definition of Integrated Water Resource Management (IWRM)1, groundwater protection should be implemented in a framework addressing social, economic and ecological factors. In addition, IWRM thinking clearly states that the entire hydrological cycle and its interaction with society should be included in developing water management strategies. The Dublin Principles further state that water should be regarded as an economic good. While it is essential that this concept does not lead to low-income groups in society being marginalized it is important that the value of water is being recognized. Furthermore, without an economic thinking it is likely that incentives to promote various groundwater protection strategies will be ineffective. The focus of the Chalmers research project “Security of Water Supply in the Mekong Region - Developing Strategies for Sustainable Groundwater Protection” is on improved strategies for sustainable groundwater protection in the Mekong region. One important part of this work is, in accordance with the Dublin Principles, to assess the economical aspects of using groundwater compared to surface water in urban water supply systems.
    [Show full text]