In Agricultural Research for Development: Case Studies from Southeast Asia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

In Agricultural Research for Development: Case Studies from Southeast Asia Critical reflections on 'going to scale' in agricultural research for development: Case studies from Southeast Asia Liana Jade Williams BIntSt (Hons) DipLang (Japanese) A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2017 School of Agriculture and Food Sciences Abstract Agricultural research projects in developing countries focus on modifying farming systems in order to contribute to higher-level development goals such as poverty reduction, food security, and rural development. The success of these projects is tied to the expansion of benefits beyond the projects themselves, that is, scaling out and up. There is significant pressure on research organisations and development actors more broadly to demonstrate the impact of their activities at scale, which is driving a preoccupation with scaling of research findings in agricultural research organisations. Literature on taking research to scale has largely been concerned with stories of technological transfer and spread—identifying which mechanisms best support the dissemination and adoption of new practices by farming households, or how to engage with government departments to embed a new practice in agricultural extension programs. Consideration of scaling processes has been disconnected from broader attention to innovation as a dynamic process influenced by individual, institutional, and political circumstances. The aim of this research was to explore the concepts and assumptions of taking research to scale in agricultural development. The perspective of agricultural innovation systems, which emphasises connectivity and its importance for innovation, was the conceptual starting point. However, this approach has been criticised for failing adequately to consider how these connections can marginalise some actors. Drawing also on political ecology and actor-oriented theory enabled a clearer consideration of diversity, power, structure, and agency to complement the frame provided by agricultural innovation systems. Within this broader framework, the key themes were: history and context; key actors and roles; strategies for scaling research; structure and agency; power and knowledge; and scale and networks. Drawing on analytical perspectives from agricultural innovation systems, political ecology, and actor-oriented theory encouraged critical reflection on how the benefits of new technologies and practices are expanded, and on some of the outcomes of these processes. Three cases of agricultural technology spread were compared: higher-yielding rice varieties in Laos; small-scale agricultural machinery in Thailand; and improved cattle management in Indonesia. Cases featured different social and political systems, different types of technology, different degrees of ‘success’, and different mechanisms for scaling. The case studies draw on interviews with key actors, project documents, evaluations, and reports to explore how the intersection of key actors, networks, and events influenced efforts to expand project impact. ii The cases highlight that the narratives and expectations around scaling are often over-simplified, reinforcing a focus on binary adoption of research-driven technology, and are unable to account for the complex array of actors, motivations, and ongoing learning processes that underpin efforts to take research to scale. Such findings call into question the validity of our expectations and claims around scaling. An emphasis on accountability and positive success stories by funding agencies may be useful to draw attention to the larger development goals and how research efforts can contribute to them, yet can also reinforce narratives of success that simplify complex processes of social change. Recognition of this complexity is important and would prompt a reconsideration of how agricultural development projects are designed, implemented, and evaluated to reflect the long- term processes of learning and adaptation that are at the heart of rural development. iii Declaration by author This thesis is composed of my original work, and contains no material previously published or written by another person except where due reference has been made in the text. I have clearly stated the contribution by others to jointly-authored works that I have included in my thesis. I have clearly stated the contribution of others to my thesis as a whole, including statistical assistance, survey design, data analysis, significant technical procedures, professional editorial advice, financial support and any other original research work used or reported in my thesis. The content of my thesis is the result of work I have carried out since the commencement of my higher degree by research candidature and does not include a substantial part of work that has been submitted to qualify for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution. I have clearly stated which parts of my thesis, if any, have been submitted to qualify for another award. I acknowledge that an electronic copy of my thesis must be lodged with the University Library and, subject to the policy and procedures of The University of Queensland, the thesis be made available for research and study in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968 unless a period of embargo has been approved by the Dean of the Graduate School. I acknowledge that copyright of all material contained in my thesis resides with the copyright holder(s) of that material. Where appropriate I have obtained copyright permission from the copyright holder to reproduce material in this thesis and have sought permission from co-authors for any jointly authored works included in the thesis. iv Publications during candidature Conference abstracts Williams, LJ., Cramb, RA., and Grünbühel, CM. (2014) ‘Taking research to scale: linking local agricultural interventions with scale theory’ in Geography that matters: Unravelling the destiny for environment, society and people in Asia, 12th Southeast Asian Geography Association International Conference, Siem Reap, 25–28 Nov. 2014. Publications included in this thesis No publications included. Contributions by others to the thesis No contributions by others. Statement of parts of the thesis submitted to qualify for the award of another degree None. Research Involving Human or Animal Subjects Human research ethics approval was provided by the University of Queensland School of Agriculture and Food Sciences Ethics Committee, Approval SAFS/H13/14. Reciprocal approval was provided by the CSIRO Social Science Human Research Ethics Committee, Approval 099/13. v Acknowledgements Thank you to my enduring supervisors, Prof. Robert Cramb (University of Queensland, UQ) and Dr Clemens Grünbühel (Asian Institute of Technology). Rob, thank you for always making time to talk, for expanding and challenging my thinking, for your empathy, endless patience, and meticulous reading of several drafts. Clemens, thank you for inspiring me to start, for sticking it out until the end, and for all your good humour, engaging conversations and guidance along the way. I’d also like to acknowledge Dr Marcus Lane for his guidance and encouragement in setting me on this path. Behind the case studies in this thesis sits the generosity of many people—researchers, government officials, farmers—who have contributed their time and knowledge. Such generosity gives research like this depth, meaning, and relevance. Thank you to all of the research participants in Australia, Laos, and Indonesia, who generously put time aside in busy schedules and trusted me enough to share their knowledge, reflections and insights on the processes and events in each case. For their support of my field work in the case on improved rice varieties in Lao PDR, thank you to Dr Vanthong Phengvichith and Dr Thavone Inthavong (National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute, NAFRI), and Dr Khammone Thiravong (Provincial Agriculture and Forestry Office), and Dr John Schiller (UQ). Thank you to Sysavanh Vorlasan (NAFRI) and Latsamy Phanthamisay for their invaluable support in arranging and translating interviews. For their collegiality and support in conducting research in Indonesia, thank you to Prof. Dahlannudin, Muhammad Supriyadi and Fuji Astuti (UNRAM), and Monica van Wensveen (CSIRO). Thank you to Dr Bruce Pengelly and the research teams who have supported my interest in their work in Indonesia and allowed me to put it under the microscope with exceptional good will, openness and encouragement. While completing a PhD part-time has its challenges, my friends and colleagues at CSIRO and beyond have proven to be an endless source of support. In particular, my sincere thanks to Christian Roth and the team from all corners of ACCA; to Michaela Cosijn, for making sure I took the time to get it done (and survive); to Andy Hall for scholarly inspiration; to Lucy Carter, Monica van Wensveen, Bruce Taylor, Anthea Coggan, Don Gaydon, Andrea Walton, Toni Darbas and Samantha Stone-Jovicich for your interest in how it was going, and helping me keep things in perspective. Thank you to all my project leaders and colleagues who have been patient, accommodating and understanding while I have hunkered down to get this done. vi Thank you to my friend and professional editor Karin Hosking, who provided copyediting and proofreading services, according to the guidelines laid out in the university-endorsed national ‘Guidelines for editing research theses’. Knowing you would cast your eyes over this brought me great comfort (any
Recommended publications
  • Naming of Traditional Rice Varieties by the Farmers of Laos S
    CHAPTER 10 Naming of traditional rice varieties by the farmers of Laos S. Appa Rao, J.M. Schiller, C. Bounphanousay, A.P. Alcantara, and M.T. Jackson The collection of traditional rice varieties from throughout Laos, together with a sum- mary of the diversity observed and its conservation, has been reviewed in Chapter 9 of this monograph. While undertaking the collection of germplasm samples from 1995 to early 2000, information was collected from farmers on the special traits and significance of the different varieties, including the vernacular names and their mean- ings. Imperfect as literal translations might be, the names provide an insight into the diversity of the traditional rice varieties of Laos. Furthermore, the diversity of names can, when used with care, act as a proxy for genetic diversity. When collecting started, variety names were recorded in the Lao language and an agreed transliteration into English was developed. The meanings of the variety names were obtained from all possible sources, but particularly from the farmers who donated the samples, together with Lao extension officers and Lao research staff members who understood both Lao and English. Variety names were translated literally, based on the explanations provided by farmers. For example, the red color of glumes is often described in terms of the liquid from chewed betel leaf, which is dark red. Aroma is sometimes indicated by the names of aromatic flowers like jasmine or the response to the aroma that is emitted by the grain of particular varieties during cooking. This chapter provides a summary of the information collected on the naming of traditional Lao rice varieties.
    [Show full text]
  • Lao People's Democratic Republic: Responding to Rice Price Inflation
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive Lao People’s Democratic Republic: responding to rice price inflation Loening, Josef L. World Bank 15 August 2011 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/33443/ MPRA Paper No. 33443, posted 16 Sep 2011 10:14 UTC POLICY BRIEF REPORT NO. 62276-LA Lao People’s Democratic Republic DraftResponding to Rice Price Inflation Report No. 62276-LA Lao People’s Democratic Republic Responding to Rice Price Inflation Policy Brief August 15, 2011 Social, Environmental, and Rural Sustainable Development Unit Sustainable Development Department East Asia and Pacific Region _____________________________________________________ This volume is a product of the staff of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA, telephone 978- 750-8400, fax 978-750-4470, http://www.copyright.com/.
    [Show full text]
  • Lao People's Democratic Republic United Nations Development Programme
    ສາທາລະນະລດັ ປະຊາທິປະໄຕ ປະຊາຊນົ ລາວ ອງົ ການສະຫະປະຊາຊາດເພ� ອການພດັ ທະນາ Lao People's Democratic Republic United Nations Development Programme Government of Lao People’s Democratic Republic Executing Entity/Implementing Partner: Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, MAF, Vientiane, Lao PDR Implementing Entity/Responsible Partner: National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute, NAFRI United Nations Development Programme Analysis of conditions for Farmer Organizations and Cooperatives from a viewpoint of Climate Change Adaptation and Resilience, and recommendations for improvements Project ID:00076176 / ATLAS Award ID 60492 Improving the Resilience of the Agriculture Sector in Lao PDR to Climate Change Impacts (IRAS Lao Project) Project Contact : Mr. Khamphone Mounlamai, Project Manager Email Address : [email protected] EDITED VERSION - 23/11/2012 Disclaimer The views, analysis and opinions expressed in this report are those of the author at the time of the study implementation. They should not be interpreted as representing views or position of IRAS project, UNDP or any other government institution, international organization or project. IRAS Laos Project Analysis of conditions for Farmer Organizations and Cooperatives from a viewpoint of Climate Change Adaptation and Resilience, and recommendation for improvements Table of Content Table of Content ................................................................................................................................. i I. Project Information and Resources .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Slash-And-Burn Rice Systems in the Hills of Northern Lao Pdr: Description, Challenges, and Opportunities
    SLASH-AND-BURN RICE SYSTEMS IN THE HILLS OF NORTHERN LAO PDR: DESCRIPTION, CHALLENGES, AND OPPORTUNITIES W. RODER 2001 IRRI INTERNATIONAL RICE RESEARCH INSTITUTE The International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) was established in 1960 by the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations with the help and approval of the Government of the Philippines. Today IRRI is one of the 16 nonprofit in- ternational research centers supported by the Consultative Group on Inter- national Agricultural Research (CGIAR). The CGIAR is sponsored by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (World Bank). the United Na- tions Development Programme (UNDP). and the United Nations Environ- ment Programme (UNEP). Its membership comprises donor countries. international and regional organizations, and private foundations. As listed in its most recent Corporate Report. IRRI receives support. through the COIAR, from donors such as UNDP. World Bank. European Union. Asian Development Bank. International Fund for Agricultural Development (WAD). Rockefeller Foundation. and the international aid agencies of the following governments: Australia. Belgium. Brazil. Canada. People’s Republic of China. Denmark. France. Germany, India. Indonesia. Islamic Republic of Iran. Japan, Republic of Korea. Mexico, The Nether- lands. Norway. Peru, Philippines. Spain. Sweden. Switzerland. Thailand. United Kingdom. and United States. The responsibility for this publication rests with the International Rice Research Institute. Copyright International Rice Research Institute 2000 Mailing address: DAPO Box 7777. Metro Manila. Philippines Phone: (63-2) 845-0563, 844-3351 to 53 Fax: (63-2) 891-1292. 845-0606 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.cgiar.org.irri Riceweb: http://wwwsiceweb.org Riceworld: http://wwwsiceworld.org Courier address: Suite 1099.
    [Show full text]
  • Thematic Interpretation Plan Savannakhet Province Lao People's Democratic Republic
    Thematic Interpretation Plan Savannakhet Province Lao People’s Democratic Republic GMS-Sustainable Tourism Development Project in Lao PDR Lao National Tourism Administration Prepared by: Linda Susan McIntosh, PhD Candidate Thematic Interpretation and Textile Specialist 33 Soi 1 Sukhumvit Road Klongtoey-nua, Wattana What is Thematic Interpretation? Thematic Interpretation is the practice of verbal and non-verbal communication, using illustrated and non-illustrated techniques to present complex subject matter in an interesting and engaging way. One model of Thematic Interpretation is TORE™ = Thematic, Organized, Relevant, and Enjoyable “Successful interpretation provokes people to think. Their thinking creates meanings in their own minds. Themes can stay with us, even when we forget the smaller facts that support them. Strong themes stick in our minds, some of them forever”. Themes, because they are whole ideas, are expressed in the same form as information already stored in our minds. So when we communicate a theme effectively we give visitors something they can readily relate, self-appropriate, and incorporate into their thinking. Themes are ideas not topics: Examples of Themes: An Example of a Topic: • Birds are a fascinating group of animals • Birds because of their special adaptations for flight. • Native birds everywhere are in a fight for their lives because of overdevelopment and Having a theme helps us prepare educational and promotional materials. It makes our job a lot easier because with a theme we able to understand what to include and not include in a presentation to visitors. 2 SAVANNAKHET HISTORIC TRAIL - Background The SAVANNAKHET HISTORIC TRAIL is a new tour circuit consisting of historic, cultural and natural attractions, situated along the East-West Corridor in Savannakhet Province, Lao PDR.
    [Show full text]
  • Annexes to RICE Proposal April, 2016
    Annexes to RICE proposal April, 2016 Annex 1. Budget summary ....................................................................................................................... 3 Annex 2. Partnership strategy .................................................................................................................. 4 Annex 3. Capacity development ............................................................................................................ 18 Annex 4. Gender .................................................................................................................................... 22 Annex 5. Youth strategy ........................................................................................................................ 26 Annex 6. Results-based management .................................................................................................... 28 Annex 7. Linkages with other CRPs and site integration ......................................................................... 35 Annex 8. RICE staffing ............................................................................................................................ 63 8. 1 Program Planning and Management Team ................................................................................. 63 8.2 Flagship project 1 ........................................................................................................................ 73 8.3 Flagship project 2 .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 25-6 Drainage System
    Final Report The Study on Vientiane Water Supply Development Project Figure 25-6 Drainage System Legend River, Canal, Trench, Natural Swamp Planned Drain Cannal Reservoir Irrigation Canal Thatluang Irrigation Pumping Station Swamp Boundary of Master Plan Source: Vientiane Urban Development Master Plan, Urban Research Institute, MCTPC 2 - 43 Final Report The Study on Vientiane Water Supply Development Project 2.5.3 GDP Projection An accurate long-term projection of the GDP is necessary for formulating the future framework of the socio-economic structure in the project sites. Official economic projections in “Five-year National Development Plan 2001-2005” and “Long-term Development Plan 2001-2020” were described in Section 5.1. The Five-year Plan has a more specific projection that includes sectoral scenarios, but the “Long-term Plan” shows overall targets for the year 2020. In this study, then, the future projections are based on the “Five-year Plan” projection scenario. The criteria for the projection are assumed as follows. (1) That major sectors grow at the following annual rates until 2005 as proposed in the “Five-year Plan”: 4.5% in the agricultural sector, 10.5% in the industrial sector, 8.5% in the services sector and a 7.0% rise from import duties. As a result, the GDP is expected to grow at 7.0% per annum on average during the planned period. (2) That after 2005, the respective sectors grow at the same rates as set in the “Five-year Plan” until the target year 2020. The GDP projected with the above assumptions are shown in Table 25-1.
    [Show full text]
  • Revealing the Hidden Effects of Land Grabbing Through Better Understanding of Farmers’ Strategies in Dealing with Land Loss
    *Title page with author details Revealing the hidden effects of land grabbing through better understanding of farmers’ strategies in dealing with land loss Diana Suhardiman (corresponding author) International Water Management Institute (IWMI) Southeast Asia Regional Office P.O. Box 4199 Vientiane, Lao PDR Phone: +856-20-77488425 Email: [email protected] Mark Giordano Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service Georgetown University ICC 511 | 37th & O Streets NW, Washington, DC 20057 Email: [email protected] Oulavanh Keovilignavong International Water Management Institute (IWMI) Southeast Asia Regional Office P.O. Box 4199 Vientiane, Lao PDR Email: [email protected] Touleelor Sotoukee International Water Management Institute (IWMI) Southeast Asia Regional Office P.O. Box 4199 Vientiane, Lao PDR Email: [email protected] Highlights (for review) Highlights The forces behind land concession and their connection to land policy are examined Farmers use different strategies to cope with land loss relying on their assets Understanding these strategies is eminent for agrarian transformation processes *Manuscript without author identifiers Click here to view linked References Revealing the hidden effects of land grabbing through better understanding of farmers’ strategies in dealing with land loss Abstract This article examines changing contexts and emerging processes related to “land grabbing.” In particular, it uses the case of Laos to analyze the driving forces behind land takings, how such drivers are implied in land policies, and how affected people respond depending on their socio-economic assets and political connections. We argue that understanding the multiple strategies farmers use to deal with actual land loss and the risk of losing land is crucial to understanding the hidden effects of land grabbing and its potential consequences for agricultural development and the overall process of agrarian transformation.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Fertility Management for Organic Rice Production in the Lao PDR
    CORE Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems: 21(4); 253–260 DOI:Metadata, 10.1079/RAF2006161 citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by RERO DOC Digital Library Soil fertility management for organic rice production in the Lao PDR W. Roder1,*, S. Schu¨rmann2, P. Chittanavanh3, K. Sipaseuth3, and M. Fernandez4 1CIP/CFC, PO Box 670, Thimphu, Bhutan. 2Swiss College of Agriculture, Zollikofen, Bern, Switzerland. 3Project for the Promotion of Organic Farming and Marketing in Lao PDR, Vientiane, Lao PDR. 4Project Promotion of Organic Rice from Lao PDR, Vientiane, Lao PDR. *Corresponding author: [email protected] Accepted 23 March 2006 Research Paper Abstract Rice is the most important agricultural commodity of the Lao People’s Democratic Republic (Lao PDR), produced largely using traditional methods with limited inputs of fertilizers and other chemicals. The country has a wide diversity in rice production systems and rice varieties, with over 3000 different varieties recorded. The rich diversity and the production environment and methods are favorable for organic rice production. Investigations were carried out to describe soil fertility conditions, management practices, opportunities and problems associated with organic production methods for rice. Soils used for rice production are mostly of low fertility, with low organic matter and N-availability. In spite of this, virtually no fertilizer inputs are used for upland rice production. Inorganic fertilizer inputs for lowland rice production have increased rapidly over the past decade, but are still below 20 kg ha-1. The most important nutrient sources are rice straw and manure from buffalo and cattle. Chromolaena odorata plays an important role in nutrient cycling in upland rice systems and is sometimes added to lowland fields.
    [Show full text]
  • Constraints to Rice Production Systems in Laos
    Constraints to Rice Production Systems in Laos J.M. Schiller1*, B. Linquist1, K. Douangsila2, P. Inthapanya2, B. Douang Boupha2, S. Inthavong3 and P. Sengxua2 Abstract In 1999, total rice production in Laos was more than 2.1 million tonnes, enough to make the nation self-sufficient in rice. Over the past 2 decades, total production has increased by about 100%, with most of the increase occurring in the rainfed lowlands where production jumped from 705 000 t in 1980 to 1 502 000 t in 1999. Even though the dry-season irrigated environment has increased production by almost nine times in the past decade (from 41 000 t in 1990 to 354 000 t in 1999) and further small-scale irrigation schemes are planned to achieve a total dry-season irrigated area of about 180 000 ha by 2005, the wet-season lowland environment will remain the most important rice-producing environment for the foreseeable future. Higher yields and reduced year-to-year variability in production can be expected with further intensification of production systems in the lowlands. However, further improvements in production will depend on higher levels of inputs and continued alleviation of some production constraints. The uplands will become less important for rice production as alternative, more sustainable technologies are developed to replace the current ‘slash-and-burn’ and shifting cultivation practices. This paper summarizes the known main abiotic and biotic production constraints in each of Laos’s rice-producing environ- ments: wet-season lowlands, dry-season irrigated, and rainfed uplands, but not those socioeconomic constraints that can also have significant impact on farmer attitudes and production.
    [Show full text]
  • Investments in Urban Water Supply 1999 – 2014
    68608 Public Disclosure Authorized Lao People’s Democratic Republic Water Supply and Sanitation Sector Review Public Disclosure Authorized Final dated December 15, 2010 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Sustainable Development Department East Asia and Pacific Region This volume is a product of the staff of the World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views of the Board of Executive Directors of the World Bank or the governments they represent. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective September 13, 2010) Currency Unit = Lao Kip (LAK) LAK 1,000 = US$0.122 LAK 8,196.7 = US$1 FISCAL YEAR October 1 – September 30 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ADB Asian Development Bank NPNL Nampapa Nakhon Luang AFD Agence Française de NPSEs Nam Papa State Enterprises Developpement NRW Non revenue water BOT Build-Operate-Transfer NSEDP National Socio-Economic DHO District Health Office Development Plan DHUP Department of Housing and NT Nam Theun Urban Planning NUSDSIP National Urban Sector DPWT Department of Public Works Development Strategy and and Transportation Investment Plan GDP Gross Domestic Product O&M Operation and Maintenance GFS Gravity Fed System OBA Output-Based Aid GRET Group of Research and ODA Official Development Technological Exchange Assistance HH Households PM Decree Prime Minister Decree IMT Implementation and PPP Public-Private Partnership Maintenance Team PRF Poverty Reduction Fund IWG Infrastructure Working Group SNV Netherlands Development JICA
    [Show full text]
  • CBD Fourth National Report
    LAO PEOPLE’S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC PEACE INDEPENDENCE DEMOCRACY UNITY PROSPERITY FOURTH NATIONAL REPORT TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY SEPTEMBER 2010 PREFACE The government of Lao PDR acceded the United Nations for Convention on Biological Diversity (UNCBD) in 1996 and committed itself, as part of its obligations as party (signatory), to develop National Reports to the Convention. In June 2004 the Lao PDR National Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 and Action Plan to 2010 was completed (submitted to the CBD Secretariat in January 2006). The National Biodiversity Strategy has as the overall goal to “Maintain the diverse biodiversity as one key to poverty alleviation and protect the current asset base of the poor” and identified seven main objectives and seven programme areas for implementation to achieve this goal. The goals and objectives of the National Biodiversity Strategy relate indirectly to the targets of the Convention, but are adapted to the Lao context. Therefore, the current Lao PDR 4 th National Report to the Convention reports mainly on the Lao progress towards the specific targets related to the Convention, rather than the goals of the National Biodiversity Strategy. Nonetheless, the Lao PDR 4 th National Report will, besides from reporting on Lao PDR’s contribution to the Convention, also provide an important baseline for subsequent reports, as well as a foundation for the assessment of the 1st National Biodiversity Action Plan, and for the development of a 2 nd Action Plan, and a possible revision of the National Biodiversity Strategy. On behalf of the Government of Lao, I would like to thank all contributing stakeholders, in particular the GMS National Secretariat (WREA) for preparing the first draft, the Department of Forestry (MAF) and Department of Environment (WREA) for taking the work further to a complete report with the technical support from IUCN Lao PDR, and to the ASEAN Centre for Biodiversity (ACB) for technical and financial support and The Agro-Biodiversity Initiative (TABI) for financial support.
    [Show full text]