Eastern Europe in the Middle Ages (500–1300)
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Eastern Europe in the Middle Ages (500–1300) By Florin Curta LEIDEN | BOSTON 9789004342576_Curta_text_proof-01.indb 3 3/21/2019 5:07:17 PM Cover illustration: Church of the Exaltation of the Cross in Środa Śląska (Silesia, Poland). Photo by Aurelia Zagórska-Koval. The Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available online at http://catalog.loc.gov LC record available at http://lccn.loc.gov/ Typeface for the Latin, Greek, and Cyrillic scripts: “Brill”. See and download: brill.com/brill-typeface. ISSN 2212-7410 ISBN 978-90-04-34257-6 (hardback) ISBN 978-90-04-39519-0 (e-book) Copyright 2019 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands. Koninklijke Brill NV incorporates the imprints Brill, Brill Hes & De Graaf, Brill Nijhoff, Brill Rodopi, Brill Sense, Hotei Publishing, mentis Verlag, Verlag Ferdinand Schöningh and Wilhelm Fink Verlag. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use is granted by Koninklijke Brill NV provided that the appropriate fees are paid directly to The Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Suite 910, Danvers, MA 01923, USA. Fees are subject to change. This book is printed on acid-free paper and produced in a sustainable manner. 9789004342576_Curta_text_proof-01.indb 4 3/21/2019 5:07:18 PM chapter 4 East European Dark Ages: Slavs and Avars (500–800) In response to repeated raids into their lands “on the far side of the river” Danube, the Slavs, thought it over among themselves, and said: “These Romani, now that they have crossed over and found booty, will in the future not cease com- ing over against us, and so we will devise a plan against them.” And so, therefore, the Slavs, or Avars, took counsel, and on one occasion when the Romani had crossed over, they laid ambushes and attacked and defeat- ed them. The aforesaid Slavs took the Roman arms and the rest of their military insignia and crossed the river and came to the frontier pass, and when the Romani who were there saw them and beheld the standards and accouterments of their own men they thought they were their own men, and so, when the aforesaid Slavs reached the pass, they let them through. Once through, they instantly expelled the Romani and took pos- session of the aforesaid city of Salona. There they settled and thereafter began gradually to make plundering raids and destroyed the Romani who dwelt in the plains and on the higher ground and took possession of their lands.1 Thus described Emperor Constantine VII Porphyrogenitus, in the mid-10th century, the migration of the Slavs from their lands to the Balkans. The story is placed chronologically “once upon a time,” at some point between the reigns of Emperors Diocletian, who brought the “Romani” to Dalmatia, and Heraclius. There is no reason to treat the story as a trustworthy historical account, but it is clear that it is meant to explain the particular situation of Salona and the former province of Dalmatia.2 No historian seems to have noticed so far that Emperor Constantine VII’s account is, after all, the only written testimony of 1 Constantine Porphyrogenitus, On the Administration of the Empire 29, pp. 123 and 125. For the sources and interpretation of the story, see Dzino, Becoming Slav, pp. 111–12. 2 In the following chapter (30), those putting to the sword the city of Salona and mak- ing themselves master of “all the country of Dalmatia” are Avars, not Slavs (Constantine Porphyrogenitus, On the Administration of the Empire, p. 143). © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, 2019 | doi:10.1163/9789004395190_005 9789004342576_Curta_text_proof-01.indb 41 3/21/2019 5:07:25 PM 42 chapter 4 an explicit migration of the Slavs. No 6th-century author mentions the migra- tion of the Slavs to the Danube, or their movement across that river in order to settle permanently in the Balkan provinces of the early Byzantine Empire, or anywhere else in Europe.3 Procopius of Caesarea, writing about Sclavenes in 550 or 551 regarded the Sclavenes as “new,” not because they were newcom- ers, but because they represented a new threat to the empire. He knew that they lived “above the Ister [i.e., Danube] river not far from its banks.”4 In the 530s, magister militum per Thraciam Chilbudius, organized attacks against the Sclavenes, the Huns, and the Antes on the other side of the Danube, a clear in- dication that the former, at least, were not far from the frontier.5 In an attempt to establish a quasi-legendary origin for the Slavs, Jordanes, who finished his Getica in 550 or 551, Jordanes made them descendants from, or a sub-group of the Venethi known from Tacitus and other ancient sources. On the basis of a map with a conical or conic-like projection, which had the river Viscla (presumably Vistula) with a west-east direction, he placed the Sclavenes be- tween the city of Noviodunum (Isaccea, in southeastern Romania) “and the lake Mursianus to the Danaster” (most likely, the river Dniester), to the south, “and northward as far as the Viscla.”6 The description of the lands of inhabited by Sclavenes, however, contains no explanation of how and when they have come to occupy those lands. No migration of the Sclavenes is mentioned in the Getica that could possibly be linked to that territorial expansion. Nor have any other 6th-century authors anything to say about the migration of the Slavs, even though some of them, such as Agathias, describe the migration of other peoples (e.g., the Cutrigurs).7 Like Procopius, Pseudo-Caesarius, Menander the Guardsman, and the author of the Strategikon all mention the Sclavenes in relation to the Danube.8 Inside the Carpathian Basin, independent Slavs are first mentioned by the Frankish chronicler known as Fredegar, who wrote around 660.9 He knew that 3 For a contrary, but utterly wrong opinion, see Fusek, “Drevnee slavianskoe naselenie,” p. 153. 4 Procopius of Caesarea, Wars 5.27.2, p. 252. See also Curta, Making of the Slavs, p. 38. 5 Procopius of Caesarea, Wars 7.14.2–5, pp. 262 and 264. The Sclavenes are those who am- bushed and killed Chilbudius during one of his expeditions across the Danube. See Sarantis, Justinian’s Balkan Wars, p. 86. 6 Jordanes, Getica V 35, p. 63. For the interpretation of this passage, see Curta, “Hiding behind a piece of tapestry.” 7 Agathias, History 5.11.5, p. 177. For the interpretation of that passage, see Curta, “The north- western region of the Black Sea,” p. 151. 8 Curta, Making of the Slavs, pp. 44, 47, and 188. 9 Several sources (Theophylact Simocatta, Paul the Deacon, the Miracles of St. Demetrius) men- tion Slavs inside the territory controlled by the Avars beginning with the late 6th century. However, neither Procopius of Caesarea, nor Martin of Braga can be cited as sources for the 9789004342576_Curta_text_proof-01.indb 42 3/21/2019 5:07:25 PM East European Dark Ages: Slavs and Avars (500–800) 43 the Slavs (whom he also called Wends, a word derived from Venethi) lived within the territory controlled by Avars (whom he called Huns), for the lat- ter wintered in Slavic settlements, where they collected tribute and slept with their subjects’ wives and daughters.10 The Slavs have been subjects of the Huns for a long time. It is within the same territories that the sons of the Huns by their Slavic concubines lived when rising in rebellion against their Avar fathers and their qagan. There is no mention of any migration of those whom Fredegar now called Wends, because they represented a political category different from those Slavs who were subjects of the Avars. It was the Wends, not the Slavs, who elected a Frankish merchant, Samo, as their king and obtained their in- dependence from the Avars. In order for Samo’s polity to become independent from the Avars, it must therefore have been effectively separated from the Avar qaganate. When deciding to wage war on Samo, the Frankish king Dagobert is said to have been helped by Lombards, who made a hostile attack on the lands of the Slavs. Those lands were therefore closer to the northeastern border of the Lombard kingdom in Italy, if the troops, which offered their assistance to Dagobert, came from the Duchy of Friuli. Samo’s state may therefore have been located somewhere in Lower Austria or in the region of the present-day border between the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Austria.11 According to Fredegar, one of Samo’s allies was Dervan, the duke of the Sorbs, who are said to be Slavs as well.12 To join Samo, Dervan had to sever his ties to the Frankish king, which implies that his duchy was within the Merovingian realm. Although there is no indication of where exactly the Sorbs lived, some associate Fredegar’s information with that of 9th-century Frankish sources that place the Sorbs on the middle Elbe river.13 Frankish annals of the early 9th century are also the first to mention Slavs on the Lower Elbe, on the south- ern shore of the Bay of Mecklenburg, as well as in Bohemia.14 Farther to the east, across the river Oder (and the present-day border between Germany and presence of the Slavs inside the Carpathian Basin during the 6th century before the ar- rival of the Avars.