London Borough of Ealing Property Strategy (2010)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

London Borough of Ealing Property Strategy (2010) Executive Summary This consultation draft IDP is a working document and is subject to change. It represents the council’s current understanding of infrastructure issues. Anyone relying on or quoting from this document does so at their own risk. This is Version 1 of the Ealing Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) for Ealing, part of the Local Development Framework (LDF) evidence base. The production of an IDP is an implicit requirement of Planning Policy Statement 12 (PPS12)1; the LDF will not be found sound without a robust IDP. The IDP also has a corporate benefit in that it provides a spatial and demographic perspective to service planning and examines what infrastructure is needed, why, where and when it is needed, as well as how it will be funded and delivered. The IDP cuts across services and partners and has involved considerable consultation with these other organisations. The IDP also is closely related to other documents such as the Ealing Property Strategy. The IDP uses recent population projections to assess the infrastructure requirements over the lifetime of the LDF Development Strategy. As Ealing population projections are updated, these will be fed into future iterations of the IDP. The IDP covers a range of social infrastructure (education, health, culture, sports and leisure), green infrastructure (open space) and physical infrastructure (waste, energy, utilities, water & flooding, transport). This report includes the supply and demand analysis of infrastructure, including mapping, with an accompanying schedule which provides a summary of the infrastructure provision issues. Key risk analysis is provided at Figure 3 (section 2.4) of the main report and next steps for the IDP are set out in Section 2.5. A summary of the supply and demand analysis by type of infrastructure is provided below. Proposed infrastructure by area follows this. 1 “The core strategy should be supported by evidence of what physical, social and green infrastructure is needed to enable the amount of development proposed for the area, taking account of its type and distribution. This evidence should cover who will provide the infrastructure and when it will be provided.” ii Planned infrastructure provision by type: Primary Education • Additional 29-35 Forms of Entry (or FE, the unit by which school planning is measured by, with 1FE equating to 1 class of 30 pupils) needed by 2018, possibly rising to 31-35 by 2012 • Current planning is for an additional 16FE permanently across the borough and at least a further 9FE of temporary expansions. Plans for the permanent increase include plans for a new 2FE Catholic primary school in West Acton, due to open in 2012 • A contingency is included for an additional sites in Ealing • There is a key risk to delivering primary school places, as if birth rates continue to rise and demand for places within the borough increases, other areas within the Borough may need additional provision. This will be monitored regularly • The IDP and LB Ealing will also need to consider emerging models of primary provision, including parent-promoter schools, the re-use of buildings (commercial, employment), and providing schools in town centres. Secondary Education • Pupil projections indicate that an additional 9 FE will be needed by 2017/18, with 14FE by 2019/2020 • Ealing are currently planning for 16FE of extra provision through 8FE in a new school in Greenford, with 8FE in rebuild/remodel of existing schools. • The total cost of this programme was £276m against a funding allocation of £257m, planned to be delivered through the Building Schools for the Future (BSF) programme. At the time of writing, only two high schools are to progress under this scheme as the BSF programme has been cancelled. New sources of funding will now therefore need to be explored for the remaining school proposals. • The key risk in relation to secondary provision is with the uncertainty regarding birth rates, with the possibility that an additional secondary school may be required post 2018 if birth rates continue to rise at current rates. iii • The BSF programme is also important in delivering locations for other facilities – such as sports halls. As the BSF programme has been cancelled (other than for Cardinal Wiseman and Dormers Wells schools), new sources of funding will now need to be explored for additional sports provision which was to result from the BSF programme. Primary Health Care The need for new health services is driven by a number of factors. These include health inequalities across different parts of the borough, issues with the condition of current health infrastructure, and the changing health policy context. Current health policy promotes the development of community based health centres which provide a range of health services in addition to GP practices across a ‘localised network.’ Four such networks have been planned across the borough, specifically: • Southall – through the Jubilee Gardens facility, Featherstone facility, Southall Broadway health facility, and possibly a facility on the Southall Gasworks, to meet the needs of the new population. • Acton – via the Acton Integrated Health and Social Care Centre. • Ealing – through the development of the Integrated Care Organisation on the current Ealing Hospital site, future replacement of the Mattock Lane Health Centre and in the future possibly on other town centres sites. • Greenford, Northolt, Perivale – with health facilities at Grand Union Village and possibly the Westway Cross centre, and a site in North Northolt. The programme for primary health care will be delivered through a LIFT Company; the model used for primary and community healthcare facilities. Changes in future commissioning arrangements and proposed mechanisms for delivery will need to be taken into account in future iterations of this Plan. The Health section will therefore need updating following comprehensive spending review in Autumn 2010. Open Space • An Open Space / Green Infrastructure Strategy is currently underway, and will include a qualitative and quantitative audit of open space. • The Strategy element of the study will improve and increase the provision of open space in a number of ways: iv - continue to provide amenity space as part of new developments, through the Development Management Development Plan Document (DPD); - continue to protect existing open spaces through the LDF; - improve quality of existing open spaces through the Capital Programme; and, - where possible, create new open spaces and improve access to and between open spaces, e.g. through the Development Sites DPD (or Site Allocations DPD). The Open Space / Green Infrastructure Strategy is scheduled to be completed in time for the submission of the LDF. Swimming Pools • LB Ealing commissioned a Sport England Study to inform its Aquatic Strategy. There are currently 10 publicly accessible pools in the borough (4 council, 6 private) • The baseline study concludes that there is limited current capacity across the borough’s pools, with car accessibility good, but walking accessibility low. • In analysing the future demand for swimming pools, there is projected to be a relatively small increase in demand by 2021 (which equates to 30 per cent of a pool). This increase is as a result of both new population and internal demographic change. However the ageing population offsets new demand from new households to a certain extent. • Any potential rise in participation promoted by sports development policies are likely to have a greater impact on demand than demographic changes. • Planned new facilities include the redevelopment of pools at Acton and Gurnell pools. However this is replacement not new provision and will provide little change to capacity, and no change to accessibility. • There is therefore likely to be some unmet demand in the future. The Sport England study recommends that this be met by improving the management of current pools rather than through new provision. v Sports Halls • There are currently 12 publicly accessible sports halls (seven run by Active Ealing, two in partnership with GLL leisure, and three in secondary schools). • The baseline position shows that there is a current unmet demand (equivalent to 8 badminton courts), and only 57 per cent of use of sports halls by Ealing residents is retained in LBE. • The model projects a slight rise in demand by 2021, due to an increase in population, partly offset by an ageing population and therefore a reduction in demand. • In terms of the future supply of sports halls, five new sports halls were planned through the BSF programme at Cardinal Wiseman, Elthorne Park, Villiers, and Drayton Manor schools, as well as at the proposed new secondary school north of the borough. At the time of writing, the proposal for Cardinal Wiseman is to go ahead. New sources of funding will now need to be explored if the other four sports halls are to be delivered. • Some unmet demand will remain in the south-east of the borough or the Acton area. This equates to approximately five badminton courts. Libraries • Libraries are a statutory responsibility as well as a valued and useful community resource. There has been recent investment in nine of the borough’s 14 libraries, although there are still a number of libraries where investment or relocation would improve service, including Hanwell, Perivale, Southall and Acton. • The role and purpose of libraries is changing and a new library strategy needs to respond to this, which may include locating libraries in town centres, to co-locate with other services, and provide complimentary facilities and services. Transport • There are a number of challenges for the transport system, including supporting population and employment growth, especially in town centres and employment areas; improving public transport access in areas of poor accessibility and where there is congestion; improving efficiency and traffic flow, and reducing congestion. vi • Delivering transport infrastructure occurs through the Mayor’s Transport Strategy and includes Crossrail, High Speed 2, Piccadilly line upgrades, bus network improvements and road management.
Recommended publications
  • Joint Retail Needs Study Update
    London Boroughs of Ealing, Hounslow and Hammersmith and Fulham JOINT RETAIL NEEDS STUDY UPDATE Volume 1: Final Report May 2010 ROGER TYM & PARTNERS Fairfax House 15 Fulwood Place London WC1V 6HU t (020) 7831 2711 f (020) 7831 7653 e [email protected] w www.tymconsult.com This document is formatted for double-sided printing. P1983 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................... i-xvi 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 Terms of reference ......................................................................................................... 1 Structure of study ........................................................................................................... 1 Context ........................................................................................................................... 1 Date of Study .................................................................................................................. 3 2 NATIONAL AND REGIONAL POLICY .......................................................................... 5 PPS12: Local Spatial Planning ....................................................................................... 5 PPS4: Planning for Sustainable Economic Growth ........................................................ 5 Practice guidance on need, impact and the sequential approach ................................... 6 Competition Commission’s
    [Show full text]
  • To Download an Outline of Our Place Strategy
    Place Strategy Introduction W hy a strategy about ‘place’? Each borough, ward and street in London has its own identity and set of dynamics. When we talk about ‘place’ we mean focussing our work on specific localities, which allows us to start from young people’s lived experience in an area and consider the multiple factors that might affect their capacity to be creative. There is always change happening in the physical fabric of London, and with an ongoing picture of growth, we are seeing shifts in the identity of local areas and creation of new communities. This strategy will help us respond to these changes. Image: Comber Grove School, photographed by Roger Brown for A New Direction Over the last three years, A New Direction (AND) has increased its connection with place-based initiatives. This includes our A New Direction is passionate work on the national evaluation for Creative People and Places and with Cultural about enabling all young Education Partnerships. Our research Londoners to reach their potential Caring for Cultural Freedom with King’s College London explored ideas of ecology through creativity, regardless of and helped us build our understanding wealth, geography or luck. of the vitality of a locally focussed cultural and creative learning system. Cover page images: Bottom left: Comber Grove School, photographed by Roger Brown for A New Direction Top: Roger Brown for A New Direction Introduction 3 Why a strategy Caring for about ‘place’? Cultural Freedom In developing a Place Strategy, we hope to Our research with King’s College London, exploring bring together and present information about the nature of Cultural Learning Ecologies, introduced our context in London, and share some of our a number of considerations that we have taken into ideas for approaching place-based work.
    [Show full text]
  • A Framework for Southall
    A Framework for April 2008 Tribal Urban Studio in association with Southall Michael Beaman Ltd London Borough of Ealing A Framework for April 2008 Tribal Urban Studio in association with Southall Michael Beaman Ltd London Borough of Ealing architec ture planning de sign Tribal Urban Studio in association with Michael Beaman Ltd Contents Contents List of Figures 1 Setting the Scene 1 Figure 1.1: Context Within London 2 1.1 Why a Framework for Southall? 1 Figure 1.2: Southall Context 3 1.2 The Process 1 Figure 1.3: Southall – Character and Place 4 1.3 Contextual Analysis 1 Figure 2.1: The Framework Plan 8 Figure 3.1: Southall Town Centre UDP Boundary 11 2 The Framework in Outline 7 Figure 3.2: Retail Centres in LB Ealing 12 2.1 Objectives for Southall as a Place 7 Figure 4.1: Major Transport Connections 19 2.2 The Framework in outline 7 Figure 5.1: Housing Character & Analysis Plan 28 Figure 7.1: The Community Hub concept - potential service provision 34 Figure 7.2: Potential Locations for the Community Hub 35 Figure 8.1: Areas for Change and Improvement 39 Part A: Planning for Change Figure 8.2: Town Centre Development Ideas 41 3 Retail and the Town Centre 11 Figure 8.3: Detailed Transport Development Ideas 43 Figure 8.4: Transport Development Ideas 45 3.1 The Current Position 11 Figure 8.5: Housing Opportunities 47 3.2 Planning for Change 12 Figure 8.6: Public Realm Proposals Plan 49 4 Transport 17 Figure 8.7: Employment Sites Identified for Change 51 4.1 The Current Position 17 4.2 Planning for Change 20 List of Tables 5 Housing, Public
    [Show full text]
  • A Force for Good
    A FORCE FOR GOOD Welcome Placemaking is a force for good in this country. Giving people a home. Creating strong communities. Foreword Generating jobs and growth. Making our society better in many different ways. It is a driving force behind this nation’s wealth and prosperity. Creating successful places transforms people’s lives, from the country to the suburbs and from council estates to the high street. It is good for the people who live and work in each community; and it benefits countless others who now enjoy fantastic public realm, playing in the parks and using the shops and facilities, as well as public transport and services funded by new development. This story does not get told loudly enough. Right across the country, councils and communities are working together with our industry, turning vacant and derelict sites into handsome places that contribute positively to life in Britain. There is a lot for everyone to be proud of. As a business, Berkeley is always learning and listening hard to what people say. On our 40th anniversary, we also want to celebrate the communities we have built together and the importance of housebuilding to all our lives. Tony Pidgley CBE, Chairman Rob Perrins, Chief Executive 1 Contents 2 Contents CHAPTER 01 The story of Berkeley CHAPTER 02 Working together CHAPTER 03 Spaces to enjoy CHAPTER 04 Places for everyone CHAPTER 05 Jobs and training CHAPTER 06 Getting around CHAPTER 07 Restoring our heritage CHAPTER 08 Transforming lives CHAPTER 09 It takes a team to deliver CHAPTER 10 The future 3 The story
    [Show full text]
  • Collected Case Studies: Housing
    tt Collected case studies: Housing • Strategic site allocation and densification • Building new suburbs • Delivering housing across the UK This paper brings together a number of case studies on how cities from the UK and beyond have delivered housing where it is needed most There is now broad consensus that the UK needs to build more homes. But the need for new homes is far more acute in some places than in others, and housing in Britain’s most economically successful cities tends to be the least affordable. Our case studies show how cities are addressing these challenges by increasing the density of existing communities, evaluating land on its merits rather than its existing designation, and working with neighbourhood authorities. The case studies demonstrating how cities deliver housing and what they are trying to achieve are split into four groups: • Strategic site allocation and densification The UK needs to deliver more housing in high-demand areas where houses are least affordable. Cities need to work proactively with partners to strategically identify the sites appropriate for housing and, where appropriate, prepare the land to make them viable. • Building new suburbs Considering other available sites and not only favoring previously developed land can help the most successful cities provide the amount of homes they need. • Delivering housing across a region Cities in the UK and internationally are working with their neighbouring authorities to get the housing they need. 1 Centre for Cities Collected Case Studies • Housing • Influencing development using public assets Cities in which the private sector property market (residential or commercial) is stronger, can use their public asset base to influence how and what kind of development takes place in ways that align with their vision for the city.
    [Show full text]
  • Southall Design Statement
    Southall Gas Works: Design Statement by URBED with Capita Symonds, WYG, Lovejoys, Jestico and Whiles and RPSDesign Statement 2 The Site Page 7 Southall Gas Works: Design Statement by URBED with Capita Symonds, WYG, Lovejoys, Jestico and Whiles and RPSDesign Statement 2:1. Site context The site Surrounding area The site The site is roughly triangular in shape The immediate surroundings to the site and runs from just to the west of include the following: Southall Railway Station for a mile Rich habitat along the main railway line from The gas holders: The retained Paddington to the South West. The site Transco area contains three gas boundary is marked on Figure 2.. holders. The largest of these is a The site has had a variety of ridged waterless holder, 90m high. industrial uses in the past including (equivalent to a 32 storey building). the manufacture and storage of The other gas holders are telescopic gas. All structures except the gas - the western holder rises to 65m infrastructure on the land retained by and the middle holder rises within a Transco have been demolished. This ridged frame to 35m. These holders has left a flat site that is subject to dominate the surrounding area and contamination in parts. There are also can be seen from miles around. a number of gas pipes crossing the The remainder of the Transco site. The majority of the site is used land is occupied by pipework and for surface parking including long- associated equipment. stay parking for Heathrow Airport as well as new car storage.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Road UB2 Southall
    Western Road UB2 Southall pocketliving.com Western Road UB2 Introduction Starter homes Welcome to Western Road UB2, our latest scheme in for city makers Southall, in the borough of Ealing. To be eligible to buy a one bedroom apartment in Western Road UB2, you need to: Pocket is a private developer of affordable housing. We sell compact one bedroom 1. Live or work in the borough of Ealing apartments to ‘city makers’ – the middle income people who make London tick. 2. Earn below the Mayor of London’s affordable Our homes are only available to eligible housing income threshold, currently £71,000 local people, who can buy 100% of a new Pocket home at a 20% discount to the open market. The only ‘catch’ is that you 3. Be a first time buyer need to live in your Pocket home. Renting is restricted because investors are not If you meet these three criteria, the rest of the process allowed – Pocket homes are designed to is pretty similar to buying a normal home. give Londoners a chance to get their foot on the housing ladder in the area that they have made their home. BRENTWOOD Southall’s bright Local investment The Mayor’s Regeneration Shenfield future Fund, TfL and the Council of Ealing are investing £7.7m creating Brentwood new boulevards and upgrading Southall is one of London’s green spaces in the town centre. Berkeley St James’ Harold hidden gems. But it may not Southall Gas Works Wood A whole new neighbourhood will stay hidden for long... a lot of be created, with 3,750 new homes on the 80 acre site opposite the things are changing.
    [Show full text]
  • Crossrail Property Impact Study
    Executive Summary Crossrail Property Impact Study October 2012 gva.co.uk Crossrail – Property Impact Study 2012 Executive Summary Executive Summary Farringdon Crossrail Station, Eastern Ticket Hall The Crossrail Vision Crossrail is among the Crossrail’s vision is for the project to play an • Crossrail will support the delivery of active and broad role in moving London more than 57,000 new homes and 3.25 most significant forward. As well as delivering a world-class million square metres of commercial infrastructure projects railway that fast-tracks the progress of London. office space that have been identified Crossrail will drive progress and leave a for development within 1 kilometre of ever undertaken in the UK. lasting legacy in many different ways. These stations along the route. include skills, employment, public art and From improving journey • Commercial office values around procurement of materials, equipment and Crossrail stations in central London will times across London, services from across the United Kingdom. But increase due to Crossrail over the next perhaps the most immediate and tangible to easing congestion decade, with an uplift of 10 per cent in benefits that Crossrail will unlock include: and offering better capital value above a rising baseline • The creation of new stations and projection. connections, Crossrail will additional rail capacity; change the way people • There will be significant increases in • Enhancing stations and their surrounding residential capital values immediately travel around the capital. urban environments; originating new around stations in central London of some over-site development opportunities 25 per cent and in the suburbs of some 20 Building the new railway above stations; per cent (again above the rising baseline projection in the period).
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2017
    The London Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2017 Part of the London Plan evidence base COPYRIGHT Greater London Authority November 2017 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk More London London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4100 minicom 020 7983 4458 Copies of this report are available from www.london.gov.uk 2017 LONDON STRATEGIC HOUSING LAND AVAILABILITY ASSESSMENT Contents Chapter Page 0 Executive summary 1 to 7 1 Introduction 8 to 11 2 Large site assessment – methodology 12 to 52 3 Identifying large sites & the site assessment process 53 to 58 4 Results: large sites – phases one to five, 2017 to 2041 59 to 82 5 Results: large sites – phases two and three, 2019 to 2028 83 to 115 6 Small sites 116 to 145 7 Non self-contained accommodation 146 to 158 8 Crossrail 2 growth scenario 159 to 165 9 Conclusion 166 to 186 10 Appendix A – additional large site capacity information 187 to 197 11 Appendix B – additional housing stock and small sites 198 to 202 information 12 Appendix C - Mayoral development corporation capacity 203 to 205 assigned to boroughs 13 Planning approvals sites 206 to 231 14 Allocations sites 232 to 253 Executive summary 2017 LONDON STRATEGIC HOUSING LAND AVAILABILITY ASSESSMENT Executive summary 0.1 The SHLAA shows that London has capacity for 649,350 homes during the 10 year period covered by the London Plan housing targets (from 2019/20 to 2028/29). This equates to an average annualised capacity of 64,935 homes a year.
    [Show full text]
  • CS9 Further Consultation Report
    Proposals for Kew Bridge, Kew Bridge Road and Duke Road (Chiswick) Consultation report July 2019 Contents Executive summary ..................................................................................................... 4 Next steps ................................................................................................................ 4 1. About the proposals ............................................................................................ 5 1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Purpose .......................................................................................................... 5 2. About the consultation ........................................................................................ 8 2.1 Purpose .......................................................................................................... 8 2.2 Potential outcomes ......................................................................................... 8 2.3 Consultation history ........................................................................................ 8 2.4 Who we consulted .......................................................................................... 9 2.5 Dates and duration ......................................................................................... 9 2.6 What we asked ............................................................................................... 9 2.7 Methods of responding ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Routes E8 110 H28 And
    D Consultation on possible changes to bus services in Hounslow, Ealing and Twickenham (E8 110 H28 635) Consultation Report March 2016 1 2 Consultation on possible bus changes to bus services in Hounslow, Ealing and Twickenham Consultation Report 3 Contents 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 2 2 The consultation ............................................................................................................. 3 3 Responses from members of the public ......................................................................... 6 4 Responses from statutory bodies and other stakeholders ............................................ 51 5 Summary and conclusions ........................................................................................... 56 Appendix A – Consultation leaflet ....................................................................................... 58 Appendix B – Leaflet distribution area ................................................................................ 71 Appendix C – List of stakeholders consulted ...................................................................... 72 Appendix D - Letter sent to residents of Amhurst Gardens and Alton Close ....................... 76 Appendix E - Petition received from residents of Amhurst Gardens and Alton Close ......... 80 Appendix F – Public meeting to discuss proposed changes to H28 bus route .................... 81 Appendix G – Questionnaire ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • West London Economic Development Strategy December 2004
    West London Economic Development Strategy December 2004 This report was commissioned by West London Partnership and undertaken by Robert Huggins Associates and Rubicon Regeneration. The views expressed in the Strategy are those of West London Partnership and do not necessarily reflect those of the London Development Agency or the Greater London Authority Group. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure that the contents of the report are accurate, neither the London Development Agency or the Greater London Authority Group accept responsibility for any inaccuracies in the data Prepared for West London Partnership in collaboration with the LDA, WLA and WLB by: West London | Economic Development Strategy 2 Contents 5 BUSINESS COMPETITIVENESS 73 5.1 Background 73 INTRODUCTION 5 5.2 Strategic Context 73 5.3 Key Issues 96 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 5.4 Objectives and Rationale 100 2 VISION 25 6 LAND AND PROPERTY 102 6.1 Background 103 3 WEST LONDON CONTEXT 28 6.2 Strategic Context 104 3.1 Overview of West London 32 6.3 Key Issues 110 3.2 International Setting 36 6.4 Objectives and Rationale 116 3.3 West London and its Surrounding Regions 40 3.4 Drivers 47 7 HOUSING 119 7.1 Background 119 4 SKILLS FOR GROWTH 56 7.2 Strategic Context 121 4.1 Background 56 7.3 Key Issues 124 4.2 Strategic Context 56 7.4 Objectives and Rationale 133 4.3 Key Issues 58 4.4 Objectives and Rationale 71 West London | Economic Development Strategy 3 8 TRANSPORT 136 11 APPENDIX 186 8.1 Background 136 Appendix A: Summary of Transport Data for West 8.2 Strategic Context 138
    [Show full text]