DOCSLIB.ORG

CS9 Further Consultation Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CS9 Further Consultation Report Proposals for Kew Bridge, Kew Bridge Road and Duke Road (Chiswick) Consultation report July 2019 Contents Executive summary ..................................................................................................... 4 Next steps ................................................................................................................ 4 1. About the proposals ............................................................................................ 5 1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Purpose .......................................................................................................... 5 2. About the consultation ........................................................................................ 8 2.1 Purpose .......................................................................................................... 8 2.2 Potential outcomes ......................................................................................... 8 2.3 Consultation history ........................................................................................ 8 2.4 Who we consulted .......................................................................................... 9 2.5 Dates and duration ......................................................................................... 9 2.6 What we asked ............................................................................................... 9 2.7 Methods of responding ................................................................................. 10 2.8 Consultation materials and publicity ............................................................. 10 2.9 How we considered equalities in the consultation ........................................ 12 2.10 Analysis of consultation responses ........................................................... 13 3. About the respondents ...................................................................................... 14 3.1 Number of respondents ................................................................................ 14 3.2 How respondents heard about the consultation ........................................... 14 3.3 Methods of responding ................................................................................. 15 3.4 Respondents by postcodes and London Borough........................................ 16 3.5 Relationship between respondent and scheme area ................................... 20 3.6 Modes of transport ....................................................................................... 21 3.7 Quality of the consultation ............................................................................ 21 4 Summary of responses to open questions ........................................................ 22 4.1 Comments on our proposals for Kew Bridge and Kew Bridge Road (High Street Brentford to Wellesley Road) ................................................................................. 22 4.2 Comments on our proposals for Duke Road and Duke’s Avenue junctions with Chiswick High Road ............................................................................................... 23 4.3 Summary of stakeholder responses ................................................................. 24 4.3.1 Politicians .................................................................................................. 24 2 4.3.2 Transport and road user groups................................................................ 31 4.3.3 Businesses and employers ....................................................................... 40 4.3.4 Local interest groups ................................................................................. 47 4.3.5 Schools ..................................................................................................... 55 5. Next steps ......................................................................................................... 56 Appendix A: Summary text of consultation proposals ............................................... 57 Appendix B: Consultation questions .......................................................................... 62 Appendix C: Consultation letters ............................................................................... 64 Appendix D: Consultation materials .......................................................................... 70 Appendix E: Stakeholders ......................................................................................... 84 Appendix F: Detailed analysis of comments .............................................................. 92 Detailed comments on our proposals for Kew Bridge and Kew Bridge Road (High Street Brentford to Wellesley Road) ....................................................................... 93 Detailed comments on our proposals for Duke Road and Duke’s Avenue junctions with Chiswick High Road........................................................................................ 98 Comments on the quality of the consultation, the materials and the information provided ............................................................................................................... 106 3 Executive summary We consulted on our proposals for Cycle Superhighway 9 in autumn 2017. We published our analysis of the responses and our responses to the issues raised at tfl.gov.uk/cs9 The scheme is an important part of the Mayor’s Healthy Streets Approach, which aims to make London greener, healthier and more pleasant through encouraging walking, cycling and the use of public transport. The feedback we received was valuable in helping us to further improve the scheme. Overall, we are progressing our plans for the scheme as outlined in the January 2019 Response to Issues Raised report. In response to the feedback received, we carried out a further consultation on two parts of the route between 30 January and 26 February 2019: Kew Bridge and Kew Bridge Road (High Street Brentford to Wellesley Road) Duke Road and Duke’s Avenue’s junction with Chiswick High Road The further consultation asked for feedback on the proposals in these two areas from residents, businesses, employers, transport users and other relevant stakeholders. We publicised the consultation using leaflets distributed across a wide area, targeted email campaigns and via news stories in regional and local media. This document explains the processes of the consultation, and provides an update on responses. We received 1,491 responses to the consultation. 38 of the responses were from stakeholder groups, which comprised politicians, transport and road user groups, businesses and employers, local interest groups and schools. We have summarised the issues raised by these stakeholders in Appendix E. There were 12 campaign style responses from owners of properties at Kew Bridge, 8 Kew Bridge Road, these were broadly based on the response from the Key Bridge Owners Association. These have been included in the overall responses. Many of the responses provided detailed feedback which we analysed in depth to ensure we understood views raised on the scheme. Next steps The feedback we received was valuable in helping us to further improve the scheme. We have produced a detailed Response to Issues Raised report available on our website tfl.gov.uk/kew-duke 4 1. About the proposals 1.1 Introduction We consulted on our proposals for Cycle Superhighway 9 in autumn 2017. The route is an important part of the Mayor’s Healthy Streets Approach, which aims to make London greener, healthier and more pleasant through encouraging walking, cycling and the use of public transport. We have published an analysis of the responses and our response to the issues raised here. The feedback we received was valuable in helping us to further improve the scheme. In response to feedback received through the consultation, we carried out a further consultation on two parts of the route: Kew Bridge and Kew Bridge Road (High Street Brentford to Wellesley Road) Duke Road and Duke’s Avenue’s junction with Chiswick High Road 1.2 Purpose We wanted to hear views on the further proposals in these two areas. Other than the two sections identified for further consultation, we will be progressing our plans for the route as outlined in the Response to Issues Raised report. No further consultation was planned on the proposals for the route except for the two parts of the route above. We will carry out local engagement on the rest of our proposals later in the process. We are intending to proceed with our proposals subject to formal approvals. 1.3 Detailed description We published detailed proposals on our website at tfl.gov.uk/kew-duke. There, we provided an overview of the scheme, along with maps and a computer-generated image of the Kew Bridge junction showing how the junction would look if our proposals were implemented. Our survey asked for comments about our proposals in the two areas. The summary text of our consultation proposals is reproduced in Appendix A. The full consultation material (including section summaries, traffic impacts, maps and images) will remain available at tfl.gov.uk/kew-duke Kew Bridge and Kew Bridge Road (High Street Brentford to Wellesley Road) The main change we are proposing is to provide a segregated two-way cycle track on the south side of Kew Bridge Road and South Circular Road. Previously we proposed with-flow segregated cycle tracks and a bus lane on
Load more

Recommended publications
  • West London Economic Development Strategy December 2004
    West London Economic Development Strategy December 2004 This report was commissioned by West London Partnership and undertaken by Robert Huggins Associates and Rubicon Regeneration. The views expressed in the Strategy are those of West London Partnership and do not necessarily reflect those of the London Development Agency or the Greater London Authority Group. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure that the contents of the report are accurate, neither the London Development Agency or the Greater London Authority Group accept responsibility for any inaccuracies in the data Prepared for West London Partnership in collaboration with the LDA, WLA and WLB by: West London | Economic Development Strategy 2 Contents 5 BUSINESS COMPETITIVENESS 73 5.1 Background 73 INTRODUCTION 5 5.2 Strategic Context 73 5.3 Key Issues 96 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 5.4 Objectives and Rationale 100 2 VISION 25 6 LAND AND PROPERTY 102 6.1 Background 103 3 WEST LONDON CONTEXT 28 6.2 Strategic Context 104 3.1 Overview of West London 32 6.3 Key Issues 110 3.2 International Setting 36 6.4 Objectives and Rationale 116 3.3 West London and its Surrounding Regions 40 3.4 Drivers 47 7 HOUSING 119 7.1 Background 119 4 SKILLS FOR GROWTH 56 7.2 Strategic Context 121 4.1 Background 56 7.3 Key Issues 124 4.2 Strategic Context 56 7.4 Objectives and Rationale 133 4.3 Key Issues 58 4.4 Objectives and Rationale 71 West London | Economic Development Strategy 3 8 TRANSPORT 136 11 APPENDIX 186 8.1 Background 136 Appendix A: Summary of Transport Data for West 8.2 Strategic Context 138
    [Show full text]
  • West London Sub-Regional Transport Plan, 2014 Update Information All Information Is Current Until 31St March 2014 Maps All Maps Are © Crown Copyright
    West London Sub-regional Transport Plan, 2014 update Information All information is current until 31st March 2014 Maps All maps are © Crown Copyright. All rights reserved (100032379) (2014) GLA Images All photographs and images are © TfL Visual Image Services unless otherwise stated Contents 1 Introduction 2 Travel in west London 3 Addressing the challenges • Supporting growth areas and regeneration • Delivering the vision for London’s streets and roads • Improving air quality and meeting CO2 targets • Making west London safer • Transforming the role of cycling 10 Addressing the sub-regional priorities in 2013/14 12 Investing to improve west London from 2013/14 16 Future opportunities 18 Funding Appendix A: Significant schemes that unlock and facilitate growth West London Sub-regional Transport Plan, 2014 update iii The west London sub-region The west London sub-region consists of the London boroughs of Brent, Ealing, Panel members: WestTrans Hammersmith & Fulham, Harrow, Hillingdon and Hounslow. Needless to say, the Tim Forrester transport network in the sub-region is influenced by neighbouring areas, principally London European Chair and TfL Sub- central London. Partnership for Transport regional Ambassador Paul Curtis Alex Williams TfL Policy Manager TfL Boroughs Richard McGreevy Strategy Advisor Georgina Barretta West London Alliance West London Heathrow Airport Ian Nichol Ian Frost sub-regional TfL LIP Coordinator partnership West London Business Danielle Shap Frank Wingate Hillingdon Brent Alan Tilly Rachel Best Hounslow Hammersmith
    [Show full text]
  • Build and Recover an Economic Recovery Strategy for West London
    Build and Recover An Economic Recovery Strategy for West London www.wla.londonBuild and Recover An Economic Recovery Strategy for West London 1 Map of West London Foreword KEY West London boasts a proud history of being at the forefront of 24 innovation, leading the way nationally in growth sectors, technology and the green economy. COLINDALE/ BURNT OAK WHO’S 3 With a pre-Covid19 GVA of £74bn, the West London economy has been hit hard by the 12 HERE 11 pandemic. An extra 71,000 people claiming benefits in May 2020 compared to the same HEART OF HARROW time last year – a 200% increase. More than 280,000 residents furloughed – that’s more than HARINGEY a quarter of all those in the capital. 19 Golden Mile-Southall Crossrail Link BRENT CROSS Heathrow Southern Rail Link 13 The impact on our communities and businesses has been colossal. Entrepreneurs and 26 21 micro businesses as well as those working in the aviation, retail, transport sectors and the WEMBLEY 20 PARK supply chain, are amongst the hardest hit. 23 There are solutions and we can build back better. PARK 25 ROYAL Council Leaders across West London have mobilised quickly to drive economic recovery by working in collaboration on shared priorities: Growth sectors, Aviation communities, Skills 5 and employment, Entrepreneurs and micro businesses, A Green recovery, Town centres and 4 Housing and infrastructure. Elizabeth Line 15 14 WHITE Crossrail link CITY 6 We are determined to mitigate the damage caused by COVID-19 and to support all our SOUTHALL 27 communities, especially those hardest hit.
    [Show full text]
  • West London Economic Prosperity Board
    London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham West London Economic Prosperity Board Agenda Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 2.00 pm This meeting will be held remotely – you can watch it live on YouTube: youtu.be/kvH6osbo00U MEMBERSHIP Councillor Stephen Cowan - Chair (Hammersmith & Fulham) Councillor Dan Thomas (Barnet) Councillor Muhammed Butt (Brent) Councillor Julian Bell (Ealing) Councillor Graham Henson (Harrow) Councillor Steve Curran (Hounslow) CONTACT OFFICER: David Abbott Head of Governance Governance and Scrutiny : 07776 672877 E-mail: [email protected] All public agendas and reports are available on our website: www.lbhf.gov.uk/committees This meeting will be held remotely. Members of the public can watch the meeting on the H&F YouTube channel Date Issued: 09 February 2021 London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham West London Economic Prosperity Board Agenda 17 February 2021 Item Pages 1. WELCOME, APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE, AND DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST 2. MINUTES OF THE PREVIOUS MEETING 3 - 6 3. DATA TO INFORM ECONOMIC RECOVERY 7 - 17 4. APPROACH TO INFLUENCING AND COMMUNICATIONS 18 - 22 5. UPDAT E ON APPROACH TO GREEN RECOVERY 23 - 32 6. WEST LONDON INNOVATION DISTRICT CONCEPT 33 - 51 7. BUILD AND RECOVER PLAN UPDATE 52 - 67 8. WEST LONDON ORBITAL UPDATE 68 - 79 Agenda Item 2 West London Economic Prosperity Board Minutes Friday 3 July 2020 NOTE: This meeting was held remotely PRESENT Members Councillors Stephen Cowan (Chair, Hammersmith & Fulham), Julian Bell (Ealing), Graham Henson (Harrow), and Shama Tatler Other Attendees Councillor Helen Rowbottom (Hammersmith & Fulham), John Hooton (Barnet), Paul Najsarek (Ealing), Tony Clements (Hammersmith & Fulham), Niall Bolger (Hounslow), Cath Shaw (Barnet), David Francis, Benaisha Daruwalla, Matin Miah (West London Alliance), Andrew Dakers (West London Business) 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The West London Orbital Story
    THE WEST LONDON ORBITAL STORY SO FAR by Peter Mynors A report of the LURS meeting at All Souls Club House on 8 September 2009 Peter Mynors has worked in transport planning for over 40 years with Travers Morgan, Symonds Travers Morgan and, now, Capita Symonds. West London has a population of 1.6 million people and its own thriving economy. It hosts such large scale employers as Heathrow Airport, Wembley Stadium, GSK and the BBC. However, it suffers from very congested roads as about two-thirds of employees drive to work. Restrictive parking standards introduced ten years ago mean that redundant employment sites are now, mainly, being redeveloped for residential use. The railway lines through West London are only radial (going to and from Central London) and these lines have only two interchanges with the London Overground’s North London Line – Richmond and Willesden Junction. In 2001, Symonds were commissioned by the London Borough of Ealing on behalf of “West London Leadership” (which includes 6 borough councils, and the West London Chamber of Commerce) to investigate improvement in orbital transport to the west of London. The study was updated in 2008. The conclusion of this study was the proposal to connect the existing radial lines with an orbital underground metro. The choice of tunnel, rather than surface line, was influenced by lessons learnt from the Uxbridge Road Tram proposal. The metro would feature short, frequent, driverless trains (similar to DLR) and platform doors (similar to Jubilee Line extension). The stations would be built first in box structures, and then the running tunnels bored in to the London Clay at a depth of 30 metres (approx.
    [Show full text]
  • Future Employment Growth Sectors Study
    Future Employment Growth Sectors Study LOCAL PLAN SUPPORTING STUDY 2017 18. Future Employment Growth Sectors Study Document Title Future Employment Growth Sectors Study Lead Author Regeneris Purpose of the Study The assessment of trends in employment growth and sectors across the London, West London and local area and recommendations of which sectors are already performing well or growing and those which may wish to move into OPDC area in the future Key outputs • Identifies the future growth sectors within the Old Oak and Park Royal area, and a comparative assessment of their potential contri- bution to economic growth. • Provides insights into the key issues impacting on these sectors, highlighting opportunities and challenges for the growth of these sectors. • Identifies the areas / places within Old Oak and Park Royal which could be attractive to each growth sector. • Suggestions for how policies, strategies, tactical and strategic actions could support future employment, skills development and economic growth. Key recommendations There are a number of growth sectors which could be supported in Old Oak and Park Royal including: • Opportunities to retain, strengthen and diversify existing econom- ic strengths. These are focussed on industrial type activities, in particular food manufacturing, transport, wholesale, logistics and to a lesser extent, motor trade activities. The area also appears to have growing strengths in a range of creative industries. There are opportunities to retain, strengthen and diversify these sectors. • Opportunities to grow, attract and innovate other economic sectors. The nature of development at Old Oak means that future growth is likely to be focused around office uses with key sectors being professional and financial services; and ICT and digital media ser- vices.
    [Show full text]
  • West London Orbital 2008 Update 1
    West London Orbital 2008 Update Document reference CS25605/D/1E Issue date 27 February 2008 © Capita Symonds Ltd 2008 Extracts may be reproduced provided that the source is acknowledged 24 – 30 Holborn London EC1N 2LX +44 (0) 20 7870 9300 Email: [email protected] Foreword by Peter Handcock, West London Business West London hosts a large and diverse base of business clients, contributing £27 billion annually to the UK economy and employment to almost 750,000 people. West London accounts for approximately 17% of the output of Greater London. With Heathrow Airport, some of the biggest blue chip businesses in the world, and an important creative industries sector, West London possesses a number of unique factors that distinguish it from its neighbours and the rest of the UK. There is also a significant concentration of employment within the transport and logistics sector, particularly air transport, with excellent road links to all parts of Britain. Residents, employers and suppliers in West London all continue to rely on an overburdened road network to move around. There is growing concern that the increasing use of cars is not sustainable, but that car usage can only be discouraged if there is public transport infrastructure that can support the transport needs of West London and provide a genuine alternative to road travel. The present rail infrastructure provides good links to central London, and these are due to be improved with Crossrail. But for orbital trips the only alternatives to car travel are buses and cycling, which only cater for relatively short journeys. The coming decade could be a turning point in west London’s economic success story, if the sub-region’s strategic transport requirements are allowed to continue to drift in an unplanned way such that economic growth will be impaired.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Formulation Reports Strategic Policies Chapter
    Policy Formulation Reports Strategic Policies Chapter June 2018 Overview Policy Formulation Reports are being produced to help demonstrate how individual policies have been developed. These reports continue to be developed. Further updates will be made to support the submission of the Local Plan. SP1: Catalyst for Growth Legislation, Policy and Guidance Context National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) Paragraph Paragraph Reference 17 Planning should encourage the effective use of land by reusing land that has been previously developed (brownfield land), provided that it is not of high environmental value. Planning should actively manage patterns of growth to make the fullest possible use of public transport, walking and cycling, and focus significant development in locations which are or can be made sustainable. 34 Plans and decisions should ensure developments that generate significant movement are located where the need to travel will be minimised and the use of sustainable transport modes can be maximised. However this needs to take account of policies set out elsewhere in this Framework. 156 Local planning authorities should set out the strategic priorities for the area in the Local Plan. This should include strategic policies to deliver: ● the homes and jobs needed in the area; the provision of retail, leisure and other commercial development; ● the provision of infrastructure for transport, telecommunications, waste management, water supply, wastewater, flood risk and coastal change management, and the provision of minerals and
    [Show full text]
  • West London Build and Recover Strategy
    WEST LONDON COUNCILS ANNOUNCE BOLD AND AMBITIOUS PLAN FOR RECOVERY 21 September 2020 A BOLD and ambitious plan to support economic recovery in West London, protecting and generating tens of thousands of jobs has been published today. The West London Alliance (‘WLA’), which is made up of seven London boroughs, say that the plans will help the 280,000 people who have been furloughed across the region to return to work quickly. It comes as a report, commissioned by the WLA from Oxford Economics which is a leader in economic forecasting, estimates that GVA across the region has fallen by 9% because of the Covid-19 pandemic, making the region one of the worst affected in the UK. A big contributor to that is the decline of the aviation industry. It is estimated that between 29,000 and 43,000 jobs that rely on Heathrow Airport have been lost or are under threat because of the fall in passenger numbers. The West London economy, with a pre-COVID-19 GVA of £74bn, was bigger than Birmingham, Leeds and Glasgow combined. It has seen an extra 71,000 people claiming benefits in May 2020 compared to the same time last year – a three-fold increase. More than 280,000 residents have been furloughed – over a quarter of all those in London. The WLA is seeking Government backing and investment in its ‘Build and Recover’ plan which is published today (21 September, 2020) and would see: • The creation of an Aviation Communities Fund by investing new and existing funding to support communities which have been severely damaged by the decline in aviation.
    [Show full text]
  • Tourism Study
    Local Development Framework Background Technical Report Tourism Study January 2007 CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 2 2.0 Hillingdon Characteristics 3 3.0 Tourism in Hillingdon 9 4.0 Supply of Hotels and Visitor Accommodation 13 5.0 Future Demand for Visitor Accommodation in Hillingdon 24 6.0 Strategic Policy Development 27 Abbreviations 42 Appendices Appendix 1 Bibliography 44 Appendix 2 Hotel Accommodation in Hillingdon 45 Appendix 3 Guest Houses, B & Bs and Non Graded Hotels in Hillingdon 47 Map1 Hillingdon’s Network of Main Transport Routes 49 Map 2 Location of London Borough of Hillingdon’s Hotel and Guest Houses 50 Map 3 Location of London Borough of Hillingdon’s Hotel and Guest Houses by Size 51 Local Development Framework Background Technical Report 1 Tourism Study January 2007 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 The purpose of this report is to consider the tourism industry in the London Borough of Hillingdon by drawing together a number of recent reports and local analysis to provide a picture of tourism in the Borough and how the sector should be considered in the emerging Local Development Framework. 1.2 With London Heathrow located in the south of the Borough, Hillingdon’s main tourism offer is provided by the 8,536 hotel and visitor rooms. As a result of the scale of the accommodation provision, Hillingdon is the fourth most significant London borough in terms of visitor accommodation (GLA, 2006) providing 7.3% comparable with the North East Sub Region (8.3%) and greater than the South East (3.4%) and South West (5.3%) Sub Regions.
    [Show full text]
  • West London Delivering the Opportunities Contents Foreword
    West London Delivering the Opportunities Contents Foreword Foreword 03 Over the past thirty years, the narrative around London’s growth has been to Introduction 05 “look east”: reclaiming the derelict Docklands, building out Canary Wharf, realising the London Olympics and locking in their legacy – and providing the transport and Aspirations for West London 06 associated infrastructure needed to support this impressive record of success The West London Vision for Growth 08 – have been the headline stories of London’s development. Yet West London’s Challenges 10 growth and assumption of distinctive roles in the economy, culture and life of the capital and the wider South East have been no less dramatic. London Success Stories 12 Addressing Delivery Challenges in West London 16 London needs to continue to make the most of its London has valuable experience of delivering West London Orbital 22 potential to the east. But as well as continuing to complex and transformative regeneration, and Call to Action 24 seize East London’s regeneration opportunities, we understands the crucially enabling role that believe London must also look west, recognising infrastructure plays. Rather than reinventing Acknowledgements 26 the significance and scale of the substantial the wheel, we have looked to recent case studies regeneration already taking place from Wembley to for examples of successful outcomes. From White City – an area projected to grow by 400,000 governance to planning, funding and delivery, people and provide 200,000 new jobs over the these case studies shed light on the critical next 20 years. We need to understand the factors factors, development catalysts and de-risking that have driven this development, ensuring that methodologies that can be applied in West London we maximise West London’s opportunities to – and drawn on more widely.
    [Show full text]
  • Written Submissions Received for the London Assembly's
    Written submissions received for the London Assembly’s Business Start-ups investigation June 2009 SB001 Croydon Business Venture Tade Adepoyibi Assistant Scrutiny Manager Secretariat (PPI 0) The London Assembly City Hall The Queens Walk London SE1 2AA Dear Tade, Croydon Business Venture Further to the E mail from Natalie Arthur please find enclosed information as requested. Croydon Business Venture provides support covering all areas of Business Start Up, including; Access to Finance, Business Advice and Managed Accommodation. We operate arguably the most successful business centre in Croydon and South London, supporting entrepreneurs with affordable business premises in two locations, with a third in the process of being built. Our innovative three day intensive business workshop receives candidates from across the UK. We have strong ties with other support organisations and I chair the Croydon Business Support Network. There is a duplication of Start Up support with many companies coming from outside the area to provide a short introduction seminar, claim the money and not continue the support needed to ensure success, because there is no money in it for them. CBV are unique that we do not drawdown monies to fund our Business support Programme, we fund it ourselves out of rental income and small amounts of sponsorship. All of our support is free of charge and we continue to help all companies whatever their status. If there was the opportunity to fund additional advisors at no cost to us we would be interested in discussing this. Yours sincerely, Chief Executive SB002 London Borough of Tower Hamlets Development & Renewal Directorate Mulberry Place (AH) PO Box 55739 London El4 IBY www.towerhamlets.gov.uk Tade Adepoyibi Scrutiny Team London Assembly Economic Development, Culture, Sport and Tourism Committee City Hall The Queen's Walk London SE1 2AA Dear Tade, Further to your enquiry I outline below the activities of the London Borough of Tower Ham!eis with regard to business start up.
    [Show full text]