DOCSLIB.ORG

Routes E8 110 H28 And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Routes E8 110 H28 And D Consultation on possible changes to bus services in Hounslow, Ealing and Twickenham (E8 110 H28 635) Consultation Report March 2016 1 2 Consultation on possible bus changes to bus services in Hounslow, Ealing and Twickenham Consultation Report 3 Contents 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 2 2 The consultation ............................................................................................................. 3 3 Responses from members of the public ......................................................................... 6 4 Responses from statutory bodies and other stakeholders ............................................ 51 5 Summary and conclusions ........................................................................................... 56 Appendix A – Consultation leaflet ....................................................................................... 58 Appendix B – Leaflet distribution area ................................................................................ 71 Appendix C – List of stakeholders consulted ...................................................................... 72 Appendix D - Letter sent to residents of Amhurst Gardens and Alton Close ....................... 76 Appendix E - Petition received from residents of Amhurst Gardens and Alton Close ......... 80 Appendix F – Public meeting to discuss proposed changes to H28 bus route .................... 81 Appendix G – Questionnaire ............................................................................................... 83 Appendix H - Analysis of responses by limiting health problem or disability ....................... 87 1 Introduction We consulted stakeholders and the public about proposed changes to bus services in the Hounslow, Ealing and Twickenham areas. The consultation was open during 9 November to 18 December 2015. Demand for bus services continues to grow in these areas. With further development planned at Hounslow and Brentford town centres, additional services are required along the A315 London Road. Changes to healthcare services have increased demand for direct links from Ealing to West Middlesex University Hospital. Crossrail services will start serving Ealing Broadway, West Ealing and Hanwell stations by 2019. In summary the changes proposed were: Route E8 would be extended from Brentford High Street, to Hounslow Bell Corner, via West Middlesex University Hospital. Buses on the route would all be double deck (currently both single and double deck buses operate on this route). It would no longer serve Commerce Road. Route 110 would no longer run between Hounslow bus station and West Middlesex University Hospital. It would be extended from Twickenham to West Middlesex University Hospital via Twickenham Road. It would no longer serve York Street and Arragon Road. Route H28 would no longer serve Wood Lane, Amhurst Gardens and Twickenham Road. It would be rerouted between Jersey Road and Osterley Tesco via Syon Lane and extended to serve Brentford County Court. School route 635 would no longer run between Hounslow bus station and Brentford County Court. It would continue to run between Hounslow bus station and St Paul’s School in Sunbury. The extension of route E8 would provide sufficient capacity. Route 481 would have a frequency increase from a bus every 60 minutes to a bus every 30 minutes Monday to Saturday daytimes and a new hourly Sunday daytime service. This route runs between Kingston (Cromwell Road bus station) and West Middlesex University Hospital. This report explains the background to the scheme and consultation and summarises the responses from the general public and stakeholders. This report has the consultation responses for the routes E8, 110, H28 and school route 635. The consultation responses for route 481 are contained in a separate report. The results of this consultation will form part of the decision making process as to whether the scheme is implemented, modified or does not go ahead. A further report will be published with our response to issues raised during this consultation process. 2 2 The consultation The consultation was designed to enable us to understand the views of local residents, businesses and stakeholders about the proposals. The potential outcomes of the consultation were: We decide the consultation raises no issues that should prevent us from proceeding with the scheme as originally planned We modify the scheme in response to issues raised in consultation We abandon the scheme as a result of issues raised in the consultation. 2.1 Consultation objectives The objectives of the consultation were: To give stakeholders and the public clear information about the proposals and allow them to respond To understand the level of support or opposition for the change To understand any issues that might affect the proposal of which we were not previously aware To understand concerns and objections To allow respondents to make suggestions. 2.2 Who we consulted The public consultation intended to seek the views of people who live near to the proposed route, current users of the service and other potential users. We also consulted stakeholders including the affected Councils, traffic police, London TravelWatch, Members of Parliament, Assembly Members and local interest groups. A list of the stakeholders we consulted is shown in Appendix C and a summary of their responses is given in Section 4. 2.3 Consultation material, distribution and publicity The consultation was available on our consultation website https://consultations.tfl.gov.uk/buses/e8-110-h28 We sent an email to stakeholders with a link to the online consultation page. We produced a 12 page A5 booklet outlining the proposals (Appendix A). We sent this to all residents, businesses and organisations within a 400 metre distance of the current and proposed routes (Appendix B). In total 53,019 leaflets were distributed. We sent a supply of leaflets to: Ealing and West Middlesex University Hospitals Local GP surgeries Libraries St Francis of Assisi Church, Isleworth The proposals for the E8 would mean that a double-deck bus would operate along Amhurst Road instead of the single deck H28. The proposals also involve removing the existing westbound bus stops on Amhurst Gardens and making a new westbound stop outside the Rising Sun pub car park. Three trees would need to be removed and replacement trees 3 planted. We sent a letter and map of the proposals to all residents in Amhurst Gardens and Alton Close (Appendix D). Posters highlighting the consultation were placed at bus stops along the routes (where space was available). We sent an email link to the online consultation to registered users of the bus routes affected. We also sent this link to users of the 235, 237 and 267 since the proposals involve an increase in bus services along London Road and Twickenham Road. In total 17,711 emails were sent out. The leaflet mentioned that copies were available in large print, audio or another language through a Freephone number 0343 222 1155. People were invited to respond to the consultation using a variety of methods. They could respond by accessing the online questionnaire; by using our freepost address at FREEPOST TFL CONSULTATIONS; or by emailing [email protected] The questionnaire asked seven generic questions relating to name, email address, postcode, organisation name (if responding on behalf of a business/stakeholder/organisation), whether the respondent had a health problem or disability which limited their day to day activities, how they had heard about the consultation, and views on the quality of the consultation. A copy of the questionnaire is shown in Appendix G. There were six questions specific to the consultation: How often do you use the bus routes? Respondents were given a choice of six answers: 5+ days a week, 3 to 4 days a week, 1 to 2 days a week, 1 to 3 times a month, less than once a month, I do not use this route How will the proposed changes affect the length of your journey? Respondents were given a choice of five answers: my journey will be shorter, my journey will be longer, there will be no change to the length of my journey, I do not know what the impact will be, I do not use this route If the proposed changes go ahead are there any routes you would start using? Respondents were given a choice of four options: yes I would start using this route, I already use this route, I do not use this route and would not in the future, I would no longer be able to use this route If you answered yes to the above question you would start using a route, please let us know where you would travel to (for example postcode, the town centre, West Middlesex University Hospital) Do you support our proposals for routes E8, 110, H28 and 635? Respondents were given a choice of three answers: yes, no or no opinion. This question was asked for: E8 extension to West Middlesex University Hospital and Hounslow Bell Corner; E8 conversion to use double deck buses from single deck; 110 proposed withdrawal between Hounslow and West Middlesex University Hospital and extension from Twickenham to West Middlesex University Hospital; H28 re-route and extension to Brentford County Court, School 635 Please let us have any comments about our proposals (please include the route number you are commenting on). Respondents were given a “free text” box to share their views 4 2.4 Meetings and site visits A route test was carried
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Joint Retail Needs Study Update
    London Boroughs of Ealing, Hounslow and Hammersmith and Fulham JOINT RETAIL NEEDS STUDY UPDATE Volume 1: Final Report May 2010 ROGER TYM & PARTNERS Fairfax House 15 Fulwood Place London WC1V 6HU t (020) 7831 2711 f (020) 7831 7653 e [email protected] w www.tymconsult.com This document is formatted for double-sided printing. P1983 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................... i-xvi 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 Terms of reference ......................................................................................................... 1 Structure of study ........................................................................................................... 1 Context ........................................................................................................................... 1 Date of Study .................................................................................................................. 3 2 NATIONAL AND REGIONAL POLICY .......................................................................... 5 PPS12: Local Spatial Planning ....................................................................................... 5 PPS4: Planning for Sustainable Economic Growth ........................................................ 5 Practice guidance on need, impact and the sequential approach ................................... 6 Competition Commission’s
    [Show full text]
  • London Borough of Hounslow the Civic Centre Lampton Road Hounslow TW3 4DN
    London Borough of Hounslow The Civic Centre Lampton Road Hounslow TW3 4DN Committee Services If you require further information about this agenda please contact: Carol Stiles Tel. 020 8583 2066 or email [email protected]. CHISWICK AREA COMMITTEE (MONITORING) A meeting of the Chiswick Area Committee (Monitoring) will be held in The Hogarth Hall, Chiswick Town Hall, Heathfield Terrace, Chiswick W4 on Wednesday, 10 December 2003 at 7:30 pm MEMBERSHIP Councillor Lynch- Chair Councillors Barwood, Gilson, Day, Thompson, Lee, Kinghorn, Davies and Oulds. Co-optees - David Beattie and David Hopkins AGENDA PART I - ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION WHILE THE PRESS AND PUBLIC ARE IN ATTENDANCE 1. Apologies for absence, declarations of interest or any other communications from Members 2. Minutes of the meeting held on 12 November 2003 (Pages 1 - 17) Public Forum The Open Forum will take place as close as possible to 9.00 p.m. for approximately 20 minutes. Members of the public may raise matters of local concern. Please bear in mind the guidelines for public participation and that it may not be possible to have a detailed discussion or response at the meeting. Points raised will be noted and used to inform the work of the Area Committee. Protocol for the Open Forum ♦ Written items to be submitted where possible. (Proformas will be available at the back of the hall). ♦ Where they are so submitted this should be by 8.30 p.m. ♦ Speakers will be allowed at the Chair’s discretion. ♦ The Chair will normally only allow one contribution per person per item and one item per person per meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 No 3 September.Pdf
    WEST MIDDLESEX FAMILY HISTORY SOCIETY Executive Committee Chairman Mrs Yvonne Masson [email protected] Vice Chairman Jim Devine Secretary Tony Simpson 32 The Avenue, Bedford Park, Chiswick W4 1HT [email protected] Treasurer Paul Kershaw 241 Waldegrave Road, Twickenham TW1 4SY [email protected] Membership Secretary Mrs June Watkins 22 Chalmers Road, Ashford, Middlesex TW15 1DT [email protected] Editor Mrs Pam Smith 23 Worple Road, Ashford, Middlesex TW15 1DT [email protected] Committee Members Mike Cordery Kay Dudman Chris Hern Brian Page Maggie Mold Programme Secretary Mrs. Maggie Mold 48 Darby Crescent, Sunbury-on-Thames Middlesex TW16 5LA Society Web site http://www.west-middlesex-fhs.org.uk/ Subscriptions All Categories: £10.00 per annum Subscription year l January to 31 December Examiners Lee Goodchild and Muriel Sprott In all correspondence please mark your envelope WMFHS in the upper left-hand corner; if a reply is needed, a SAE/IRCs must be enclosed. Members are asked to note that receipts are only sent by request, if return postage is included. Published by West Middlesex Family History Society Registered Charity No. 291906 WEST MIDDLESEX FAMILY HISTORY SOCIETY JOURNAL Volume 24 Number 3 September 2006 Contents Future meetings …………………………………………….. 2 News Roundup ……………………………………………... 3 WMFHS Noticeboard ……………………………………… 4 West Middlesex FHS Tape Library from 1992 ……………. 9 A Remarkable Addendum to the Story of the Unconventional Great Aunt ………………………………... 11 A Very Victorian Affair ……………………………………. 12 Was Your Ancestor a Police Officer? ……………………… 21 Visit to Brookwood Cemetery in July 2006 ………………... 22 Alice German RN, USA …………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • To Download an Outline of Our Place Strategy
    Place Strategy Introduction W hy a strategy about ‘place’? Each borough, ward and street in London has its own identity and set of dynamics. When we talk about ‘place’ we mean focussing our work on specific localities, which allows us to start from young people’s lived experience in an area and consider the multiple factors that might affect their capacity to be creative. There is always change happening in the physical fabric of London, and with an ongoing picture of growth, we are seeing shifts in the identity of local areas and creation of new communities. This strategy will help us respond to these changes. Image: Comber Grove School, photographed by Roger Brown for A New Direction Over the last three years, A New Direction (AND) has increased its connection with place-based initiatives. This includes our A New Direction is passionate work on the national evaluation for Creative People and Places and with Cultural about enabling all young Education Partnerships. Our research Londoners to reach their potential Caring for Cultural Freedom with King’s College London explored ideas of ecology through creativity, regardless of and helped us build our understanding wealth, geography or luck. of the vitality of a locally focussed cultural and creative learning system. Cover page images: Bottom left: Comber Grove School, photographed by Roger Brown for A New Direction Top: Roger Brown for A New Direction Introduction 3 Why a strategy Caring for about ‘place’? Cultural Freedom In developing a Place Strategy, we hope to Our research with King’s College London, exploring bring together and present information about the nature of Cultural Learning Ecologies, introduced our context in London, and share some of our a number of considerations that we have taken into ideas for approaching place-based work.
    [Show full text]
  • A Framework for Southall
    A Framework for April 2008 Tribal Urban Studio in association with Southall Michael Beaman Ltd London Borough of Ealing A Framework for April 2008 Tribal Urban Studio in association with Southall Michael Beaman Ltd London Borough of Ealing architec ture planning de sign Tribal Urban Studio in association with Michael Beaman Ltd Contents Contents List of Figures 1 Setting the Scene 1 Figure 1.1: Context Within London 2 1.1 Why a Framework for Southall? 1 Figure 1.2: Southall Context 3 1.2 The Process 1 Figure 1.3: Southall – Character and Place 4 1.3 Contextual Analysis 1 Figure 2.1: The Framework Plan 8 Figure 3.1: Southall Town Centre UDP Boundary 11 2 The Framework in Outline 7 Figure 3.2: Retail Centres in LB Ealing 12 2.1 Objectives for Southall as a Place 7 Figure 4.1: Major Transport Connections 19 2.2 The Framework in outline 7 Figure 5.1: Housing Character & Analysis Plan 28 Figure 7.1: The Community Hub concept - potential service provision 34 Figure 7.2: Potential Locations for the Community Hub 35 Figure 8.1: Areas for Change and Improvement 39 Part A: Planning for Change Figure 8.2: Town Centre Development Ideas 41 3 Retail and the Town Centre 11 Figure 8.3: Detailed Transport Development Ideas 43 Figure 8.4: Transport Development Ideas 45 3.1 The Current Position 11 Figure 8.5: Housing Opportunities 47 3.2 Planning for Change 12 Figure 8.6: Public Realm Proposals Plan 49 4 Transport 17 Figure 8.7: Employment Sites Identified for Change 51 4.1 The Current Position 17 4.2 Planning for Change 20 List of Tables 5 Housing, Public
    [Show full text]
  • Pfmv9 Assumptions Report
    PFMv9 Assumptions Report May 2020 © HS2 Ltd www.hs2.org.uk High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has been tasked by the Department for Transport (DfT) with managing the delivery of a new national high speed rail network. It is a non-departmental public body wholly owned by the DfT. High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, Two Snowhill Snow Hill Queensway Birmingham B4 6GA Telephone: 08081 434 434 General email enquiries: [email protected] Website: www.hs2.org.uk High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has actively considered the needs of blind and partially sighted people in accessing this document. The text will be made available in full on the HS2 website. The text may be freely downloaded and translated by individuals or organisations for conversion into other accessible formats. If you have other needs in this regard please contact High Speed Two (HS2) Limited. © High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, 2020, except where otherwise stated. Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with High Speed Two (HS2) Limited. This information is licensed under the Open Government Licence v2.0. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ version/2 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or e-mail: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third-party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Printed in Great Britain on paper containing at least 75% recycled fibre PFMv9 Assumptions Report Revision: Rev01 Contents 1 Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Community Scrutiny Annual Report
    Appendix 1 SCRUTINY REVIEW PANEL 2 – 2016/2017 TTRRAANNSSPPOORRTT FFIINNAALL RREEPPOORRTT 5 April 2017 Page 1 of 114 CONTENTS Page Contents 2 Chair’s Overview 3 Introduction 5 Methodology 5 Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations 7 Key Learning Points 96 Membership and Attendance 97 Background Information 100 Proposed Recommendations 103 Proposed Recommendations with Officer Comments 105 Page 2 of 114 CHAIR’S OVERVIEW Councillor Aysha Raza (Panel Chair) Tasked with scrutinising Transport in Ealing was a daunting prospect for our Panel, with the subject matter being so very vast. As a non-driver I have been using public transport all my life and know first-hand its strengths and challenges. Ealing is currently facing some major transportation challenges with the progress of Crossrail/Elizabeth Line, possible third runway for Heathrow, HS2 and the huge restructuring of our healthcare. We envisaged looking at our borough's transport connectivity taking these current projects into consideration, with a view to identifying the gaps where provision is limited to find solutions for the residents living there. It is particularly important to have good inter- borough connections with our neighbouring boroughs such as Brent, Hammersmith & Fulham, Harrow, Hillingdon and Hounslow as we will now be expected to access many services such as healthcare provision over the whole North West London area. Connectivity within our borough is key to economic prosperity ensuring people are able to move around our borough with reliable transportation to get to and from work and places of education as well as access our parks and leisure facilities. Health strategies are increasingly focused on prevention and better ageing for our population.
    [Show full text]
  • St Paul's Brentford
    ST PAUL’S BRENTFORD Consultation Draft Conservation Area Appraisal September 2017 ST PAUL’S BRENTFORD Foreword I am pleased to present the draft St Paul’s Conservation Area Appraisal. St Paul’s is an important part of Brentford and a valuable part of the heritage of the borough. This draft appraisal builds on the original conservation statements for Hounslow’s conservation areas and has been reviewed as part of a comprehensive review of Hounslow’s conservation area statements. The purpose of the appraisal is to provide an overview of historic developments and key components that contribute to the special interest. This appraisal will also identify positive and negative contributors as well as opportunities for improvement in order to inform a comprehensive understanding of the conservation area. The regeneration of Brentford offers the opportunity to improve the high street and areas surrounding the conservation area through high quality new development and improved public spaces. We hope this document will play a significant role in the future management of St Paul’s Conservation Area and will be a guide for developers, residents and planners. We look forward to hearing your views on the draft appraisal and will amend this where appropriate, following consultation. Steve Curran Councillor Steve Curran Leader of the Council and Cabinet Member for Corporate Strategy, Planning and Regeneration 2 ST PAUL’S BRENTFORD Executive Summary Presented here is the draft consultation version of the St. Paul’s Brentford Conservation Area Appraisal. The purpose of a conservation area appraisal is to provide an overview of the historic development of the area and to describe the key components that contribute to the special interest of the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Gunnersbury Park
    GUNNERSBURY PARK Conservation Area Appraisal Consultation Draft May 2018 GUNNERSBURY PARK l 2 Foreword I am pleased to present the draft Gunnersbury Park Conservation Area Appraisal. Gunnersbury Park is an important part of Brentford and Chiswick and a valuable part of the heritage of the borough. This draft appraisal builds on the original conservation statements for Hounslow’s conservation areas and has been reviewed as part of a comprehensive review of Hounslow’s conservation area statements. The purpose of the appraisal is to provide an overview of historic developments and key components that contribute to the special interest. This appraisal will also identify positive and negative contributors as well as opportunities for improvement in order to inform a comprehensive understanding of the conservation area. The regeneration of the Great West Corridor and Brentford East offers the opportunity to improve the conservation area and its surroundings through high quality new development and improved public UHDOP:HKRSHWKLVGRFXPHQWZLOOSOD\DVLJQL¿FDQWUROHLQWKHIXWXUHPDQDJHPHQWRI*XQQHUVEXU\3DUN Conservation Area and will be a guide for developers, residents and planners. We look forward to hearing your views on the draft appraisal and will amend this where appropriate, following consultation. Steve Curran Councillor Steve Curran Leader of the Council and Cabinet Member for Corporate Strategy, Planning and Regeneration GUNNERSBURY PARK l 3 Executive Summary Presented here is the consultation draft version of the Gunnersbury Park Conservation Area Appraisal. The purpose of a conservation area appraisal is to provide an overview of the historic development of the area and to describe the key components that contribute to the special interest of the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Crossrail 1 Corridor 6 (Richmond/Kingston/Norbiton) Proposal
    Crossrail 1 Corridor 6 (Richmond/Kingston/Norbiton) Proposal Response by London Borough of Hounslow February 2003 Crossrail 1 Corridor 6 (Richmond/Kingston/Norbiton) Proposal: Response by London Borough of Hounslow February 2003 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Context This submission constitutes the London Borough of Hounslow’s response to an invitation to provide initial comments on the Crossrail project’s proposal for a new corridor for Crossrail 1: Corridor 6 – Norbiton, via Old Oak Common, Acton, Chiswick, Richmond and Kingston. The submission considers the proposal in terms of service and amenity for the borough’s residents and businesses, and within the context of the Council’s published policies. In addition to the two options that constitute the Corridor 6 proposals, this submission provides two further options for Crossrail’s consideration. While the Council must record its disappointment that an effective period of less than two weeks was offered for preparation of this submission, the Council also wishes to record its appreciation for the assistance given by the Crossrail consultation team during the preparation of the submission. 1.2 Council Policies The London Borough of Hounslow Unitary Development Plan’s objectives relating to transport and land use development are summarised below: • To promote sustainable transport modes (walking, cycling, public and waterborne transport) which improves access for all members of the community and enhances public transport provision in London as a whole, while reducing car traffic and the demand for road space. • To encourage a pattern of land use, and provision of transport which minimises harm to the environment and reduces the need to travel, especially by car, whilst maximising development opportunities in the Borough.
    [Show full text]
  • A Force for Good
    A FORCE FOR GOOD Welcome Placemaking is a force for good in this country. Giving people a home. Creating strong communities. Foreword Generating jobs and growth. Making our society better in many different ways. It is a driving force behind this nation’s wealth and prosperity. Creating successful places transforms people’s lives, from the country to the suburbs and from council estates to the high street. It is good for the people who live and work in each community; and it benefits countless others who now enjoy fantastic public realm, playing in the parks and using the shops and facilities, as well as public transport and services funded by new development. This story does not get told loudly enough. Right across the country, councils and communities are working together with our industry, turning vacant and derelict sites into handsome places that contribute positively to life in Britain. There is a lot for everyone to be proud of. As a business, Berkeley is always learning and listening hard to what people say. On our 40th anniversary, we also want to celebrate the communities we have built together and the importance of housebuilding to all our lives. Tony Pidgley CBE, Chairman Rob Perrins, Chief Executive 1 Contents 2 Contents CHAPTER 01 The story of Berkeley CHAPTER 02 Working together CHAPTER 03 Spaces to enjoy CHAPTER 04 Places for everyone CHAPTER 05 Jobs and training CHAPTER 06 Getting around CHAPTER 07 Restoring our heritage CHAPTER 08 Transforming lives CHAPTER 09 It takes a team to deliver CHAPTER 10 The future 3 The story
    [Show full text]
  • The Geoarchaeology of Past River Thames Channels at Syon Park, Brentford
    THE GEOARCHAEOLOGY OF PAST RIVER THAMES CHANNELS AT SYON PARK, BRENTFORD Jane Corcoran, Mary Nicholls and Robert Cowie SUMMARY lakes created during the mid-18th century (discussed later). The western lake extends Geoarchaeological investigations in a shallow valley in from the Isleworth end of the park to the Syon Park identified two superimposed former channels main car park for both Syon House and the of the River Thames. The first formed during the Mid Hilton London Syon Park Hotel (hereafter Devensian c.50,000 bp. The second was narrower and the hotel site), while the other lies to the formed within the course of the first channel at the end north-east near the Brentford end of the of the Late Devensian. Both would have cut off part of park. The south-west and north-east ends the former floodplain, creating an island (now occupied of the arc are respectively centred on NGR by Syon House and part of its adjacent gardens and 516650 176370 and 517730 177050 (Fig 1). park). The later channel silted up early in the Holocene. In dry conditions part of the palaeochannel The valley left by both channels would have influenced may be seen from the air as a dark cropmark human land use in the area. During the Mesolithic the on the south-east side of the west lake and is valley floor gradually became dryer, although the area visible, for example, on an aerial photograph continued to be boggy and prone to localised flooding till taken in August 1944. modern times, leaving the ‘island’ as a distinct area of This article presents a summary of the geo- higher, dryer land.
    [Show full text]