London Borough of Hounslow the Civic Centre Lampton Road Hounslow TW3 4DN

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

London Borough of Hounslow the Civic Centre Lampton Road Hounslow TW3 4DN London Borough of Hounslow The Civic Centre Lampton Road Hounslow TW3 4DN Committee Services If you require further information about this agenda please contact: Carol Stiles Tel. 020 8583 2066 or email [email protected]. CHISWICK AREA COMMITTEE (MONITORING) A meeting of the Chiswick Area Committee (Monitoring) will be held in The Hogarth Hall, Chiswick Town Hall, Heathfield Terrace, Chiswick W4 on Wednesday, 10 December 2003 at 7:30 pm MEMBERSHIP Councillor Lynch- Chair Councillors Barwood, Gilson, Day, Thompson, Lee, Kinghorn, Davies and Oulds. Co-optees - David Beattie and David Hopkins AGENDA PART I - ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION WHILE THE PRESS AND PUBLIC ARE IN ATTENDANCE 1. Apologies for absence, declarations of interest or any other communications from Members 2. Minutes of the meeting held on 12 November 2003 (Pages 1 - 17) Public Forum The Open Forum will take place as close as possible to 9.00 p.m. for approximately 20 minutes. Members of the public may raise matters of local concern. Please bear in mind the guidelines for public participation and that it may not be possible to have a detailed discussion or response at the meeting. Points raised will be noted and used to inform the work of the Area Committee. Protocol for the Open Forum ♦ Written items to be submitted where possible. (Proformas will be available at the back of the hall). ♦ Where they are so submitted this should be by 8.30 p.m. ♦ Speakers will be allowed at the Chair’s discretion. ♦ The Chair will normally only allow one contribution per person per item and one item per person per meeting. ♦ Items on the main agenda should not be raised in the open forum. ♦ Items where the debate cannot be contained within the public forum may be continued at a future forum or may be put on a future agenda with an officer’s report. 3. Partnership and Community Team, Lifelong Learning, Leisure and Cultural Services (Pages 18 - 31) 4. Property and Land Management Best Value Review (Pages 32 - 36) 5. Corporate Equalities Management Framework- Presentation 6. Chiswick Bus Services Probable Changes and Future Possibilities (Pages 37 - 64) 7. Urgent Business Any business which the Chair agrees to accept on grounds of urgency. DECLARING INTERESTS Committee members are reminded that if they have a personal interest in any matter being discussed at the meeting they must declare the interest and if the interest is also a prejudicial interest then they may not take part in any discussion or vote on the matter. M.J. SMITH DISTRIBUTION: Council Members Chief Officers Public Press Assistant Chief Executive (Legal) 1 December 2003 Agenda Item 2 At a meeting of the Chiswick Area Committee (Monitoring) held on Wednesday, 12 November 2003 at 7:30 pm at The Council Chamber, Chiswick Town Hall, Heathfield Terrace, Chiswick W4. Present: Councillor Thompson (Vice Chair in the Chair) Councillors Barwood, Gilson, Day, Lee, Kinghorn and Oulds. David Hopkins Apologies for Absence Councillor Lynch (Chair); David Beattie Councillor Davies sent apologies but was able to attend for the final part of the meeting. 28. Apologies for absence, declarations of interest or any other communications from Members Councillor Thompson, Vice-Chair of the Area Committee took the Chair as Councillor Lynch was unwell. The Chair made the following announcements: The Committee noted the death of Shirley Hadi, Chair of the Friends of Chiswick Library and recognised her sterling work for the people of Chiswick over many years through a variety of activities. The Committee passed condolences to her friends and family. The switch on of the Christmas Lights in Chiswick High Road would take place on Thursday, 20 November 2003 at 6.30 p.m. A press release with details was attached to the update from the last meeting, circulated to members and the public. Two reports listed on the agenda had been deferred, pending further information. More information was awaited in respect of the Bus Review report and the authority had received news that consideration of the West London Transit had been postponed until May. The Chair apologised to those members of the public attending for those items. He intended to rearrange the agenda order to reflect the interests of members of the public attending. 29. Chiswick Bus Services Possibilities Consideration of this issue was deferred, pending the receipt of further information from external agencies. 30. West London Transit Consideration of this issue was deferred, pending further information. 1 31. Licensing Act 2003 See the report of the Head of Street Management and Public Protection – Agenda Item 3. Andy Fielding, Assistant Head of Street Management and Public Protection, presented the report. He explained that the new Licensing Act was a substantive piece of legislation introducing a new regime for licensing. The key changes were set out in the report. The legislation provided a mechanism for the government’s intention to introduce more flexible opening hours, subject to the wishes of local communities. The Act gave extra powers to the police and local authorities to deal with the implications of extended opening. The legislation removed Licensing from the Magistrates Courts to the local authority. The local authority was required to establish a Licensing Committee of between 10-15 elected members to discharge its licensing functions. The draft Statutory Guidance indicated that all applications subject to objections would need to be determined by the Licensing Committee, via a Sub Committee of 3 elected members drawn from the main Committee. In Hounslow it was proposed that the Licensing Committee should consist of 15 members. This would be made up of two representatives from each of the Area Committees, together with further nominees from the political groups to ensure political balance. The timetable for introducing the new arrangements would be six months from the date Parliament agreed the Statutory Guidance. This agreement was imminent, so it was anticipated that the new scheme would be live between April-June 2004. The licenses, if granted, would not be implemented for 12 months, so that two parallel arrangements would be in place for a time. The authority had approximately six months to set up its Licensing Committee, agree its Licensing Policy and put new procedures in place. Mr Fielding invited the Area Committee to put forward two nominations for members to serve on the Licensing Committee. The Chair thanked Mr Fielding for his clear presentation and stated his belief that it was sensible to bring licensing procedures together as a way forward to control licensing arrangements in local areas. The Chair invited comments. Peter Eversden of the Chiswick Protection Group informed the meeting that the London Forum and Civic Trust had given evidence to the Parliamentary Select Committee and the GLA about the cumulative effect of licensing premises for dancing and other activities within an area. He referred to the Open All Hours papers available on the Civic Trust website. There was concern about the movement of people from one licensed premises to another, possibly across boroughs, when opening hours varied and some remained open later. This caused a lot of disturbance. Mr Eversden urged caution since other government departments such as the Home Office and Ministry of Leisure and Sport had not yet finalised their legislation. He warned that there were loopholes. 2 David Hopkins, Co-opted Member, joined the meeting at this point. The Chair spoke of his experience as a ward councillor trying to prevent late licenses, for example a request by All Bar One to have late opening every night. Members were conscious that Chiswick High Road had a large residential component. He hoped that councillors would have the opportunity to bring such information to be considered in respect of licensing. Councillor Kinghorn stressed that within London there needed to be a dialogue across boroughs. Licensing practices would interrelate since there would be movement across Hammersmith, Hounslow and Ealing to access premises with late night opening. Mr Fielding acknowledged that there were many concerns about implementation but the new Act did bring together 5-6 regimes to one. The draft Guidance was ambivalent and there were a number of issues concerning zoning and the cumulative effect. Mr Fielding agreed that Councillor Kinghorn’s point was fundamental. He envisaged Hounslow’s Licensing Committee meeting with those of other authorities to address cross borough issues. Councillors Gilson and Lee were nominated and agreed as the Area Committee’s representatives on the Licensing Committee. Resolved: That Councillor Gilson and Councillor Lee would be the Area Committee’s representatives on the Licensing Committee. 32. Crossrail Benchmark Scheme and Options 5 & 6 See the report of the Assistant Chief Executive, Corporate Policy and Regeneration – Agenda Item 4. Chris Calvi-Freeman, Head of Transport, provided the Committee with an overview of the scheme. Crossrail had confirmed their intention to proceed with the Benchmark Scheme, including the line to Richmond/Kingston. The Benchmark Scheme proposed routes along the Heathrow Corridor, the Richmond/Kingston Corridor, plus two in East London and North Kent. The scheme proposed 24 trains per hour from Central London, with most going to Paddington. The project would not be in operation until 2013 at the earliest. Crossrail had approached the London Borough of Hounslow in February to discuss a route southwest to Norbiton. Options were a route via the North London line or via a Chiswick tunnel around Fishers Lane, with a station near Sainsburys. The Council had commented that one option had poor interchange and the second had implications for the community of major works on Chiswick Back Common. The Council also proposed two other options – a route from the North London line to the Hounslow loop and an interchange at Chiswick Business Park linking with Hounslow and Feltham.
Recommended publications
  • 2006 No 3 September.Pdf
    WEST MIDDLESEX FAMILY HISTORY SOCIETY Executive Committee Chairman Mrs Yvonne Masson [email protected] Vice Chairman Jim Devine Secretary Tony Simpson 32 The Avenue, Bedford Park, Chiswick W4 1HT [email protected] Treasurer Paul Kershaw 241 Waldegrave Road, Twickenham TW1 4SY [email protected] Membership Secretary Mrs June Watkins 22 Chalmers Road, Ashford, Middlesex TW15 1DT [email protected] Editor Mrs Pam Smith 23 Worple Road, Ashford, Middlesex TW15 1DT [email protected] Committee Members Mike Cordery Kay Dudman Chris Hern Brian Page Maggie Mold Programme Secretary Mrs. Maggie Mold 48 Darby Crescent, Sunbury-on-Thames Middlesex TW16 5LA Society Web site http://www.west-middlesex-fhs.org.uk/ Subscriptions All Categories: £10.00 per annum Subscription year l January to 31 December Examiners Lee Goodchild and Muriel Sprott In all correspondence please mark your envelope WMFHS in the upper left-hand corner; if a reply is needed, a SAE/IRCs must be enclosed. Members are asked to note that receipts are only sent by request, if return postage is included. Published by West Middlesex Family History Society Registered Charity No. 291906 WEST MIDDLESEX FAMILY HISTORY SOCIETY JOURNAL Volume 24 Number 3 September 2006 Contents Future meetings …………………………………………….. 2 News Roundup ……………………………………………... 3 WMFHS Noticeboard ……………………………………… 4 West Middlesex FHS Tape Library from 1992 ……………. 9 A Remarkable Addendum to the Story of the Unconventional Great Aunt ………………………………... 11 A Very Victorian Affair ……………………………………. 12 Was Your Ancestor a Police Officer? ……………………… 21 Visit to Brookwood Cemetery in July 2006 ………………... 22 Alice German RN, USA …………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Past Spring 2021 Summer 2021 Winter 2021/2022 What Is
    1 Who we are & Why we are here Habinteg are a Housing Association specialising in providing accessible homes to those who need them, within inclusive and welcoming The Lindens Bolton Road neighbourhoods. Our focus is on providing much-needed homes for those with disabilities, alongside other high-quality and well-designed properties for those who don’t currently have specialist requirements, but may in the future. Our intention for this site, and other small sites within the Borough, is to maximise the opportunities to create high-quality homes, whilst minimising disruption to existing residents. In order to achieve these The Lindens goals, we are working in partnership with Hounslow Council, and have employed a team of specialist consultants, with vast experience in similar developments. The architects for the development are Levitt Bernstein, an award-winning design practice, and the planning consultants are Magenta Planning, a dynamic London-based consultancy. What is happening As part of London Borough of Hounslow’s commitment to providing 5,000 new affordable homes by 2022. This site will provide affordable housing and be well- designed to meet the Council’s ambitions to become energy efficient. Inspired by the GLA’s “Small Sites, Small Builders Programme”, the London Borough of Hounslow Council has identified a number of small sites within the Borough that may be able to be developed, to provide much-needed affordable and accessible housing. The garage area within The Lindens has been identified as one such potential development site. Habinteg, a Housing Association who specialise in providing accessible and adaptable homes, are proposing to develop the site, in partnership with the Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Build a New Home?
    delivered to your door propertyYour paper, local London & Southern Edition March/April 2016 PROPERTY OF THE MONTH P8 MORTGAGES P23 BUDGET P41 INTERIORS P42 GARDENING P46 Why build a The first step new home? P3 – six great starter homes P6 One of the most exclusive addresses in Mill Hill. Computer generated illustration indicative only. Final elegantly appointed apartments now released Completions from March 2016 Available to view Information Centre and Showhomes open daily 10am - 5pm 2 and 3 bedroom apartments from £875,000 - £1,850,000 For further information telephone 01753 336594, email [email protected] or visit www.stjosephsgate.co.uk St Joseph’s Gate, Lawrence Street, Mill Hill, London, NW7 4JZ London, Kent, Sussex, Surrey, Hampshire, Isle of Wight – Find your new home at Whathouse.com The Halebourne Group Find your new home at whathouse.com/new-homes new home 3 Open March 2016 Welcome! Show Home Why buy a new his March’s Budget speech merely confirmed one or two of the changes to the property market previously Tintroduced, with the Lifetime ISA the only brand new announcement with effect on potential homebuyers – and even that is a very similar build home? product to the Help to Buy What are the reasons why house-hunters should consider buying a new build home? ISA he brought to the market last November. rand new is special. Many Some of us will certainly be THE LATEST disappointed that the Chancellor house-hunters simply love the STANDARDS The Ridge ‘blank canvas’ of a brand new did not clarify – or modify – last New-build homes are built to high year’s stamp duty changes for buy- RIDGEMOUNT ROAD SUNNINGDALE SL5 9JQ home.
    [Show full text]
  • Chiswick Station House Chswick Station House
    Chiswick Station House Chswick Station House Location: Located on the platform edge of the current Chiswick Railway Station the once Stationmaster’s workplace during the golden age of steam is idealy located for any thriving business. By Train - The Grade II listed building sits on the Eastbound platform of Chiswick railway station, 25 minutes from Waterloo. By Tube - The nearest underground station is Turnham Green on the District Line. From there, the site is either a 5 minute cab ride, a 10 minute E3 bus ride, or a leafy twenty minute walk through the historic grounds of Chiswick House. By Car - From Heathrow and the West, take the M4 Eastbound until it runs in to the A4 at Chiswick. Follow signs for Grove Park, turning onto Sutton Court Road which leads into Burlington Lane and Chiswick Station. The Listed Building History Originall designed and constructed in 1849 by william Tite for the Windsor, Staines and South Western Railway, Chiswick Station House is a predominantley a two storey building with small single storey wings abutting each side. Constructed from London stock brick and adorned with rendered quoins and dressings Chiswick Station House is a beautiful example of the Tite ‘Classical Villa. The station house ceased being used by the railway in 1989 and was subsequently taken into private ownership and houses commercial premises. In 2003, with the support and co-operation of London Borough of Hounslow, the then unoccupied and poorly maintained listed building was extended and refurbished to create circa 2,500 sqft of net lettable high quality commercial space.
    [Show full text]
  • Pfmv9 Assumptions Report
    PFMv9 Assumptions Report May 2020 © HS2 Ltd www.hs2.org.uk High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has been tasked by the Department for Transport (DfT) with managing the delivery of a new national high speed rail network. It is a non-departmental public body wholly owned by the DfT. High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, Two Snowhill Snow Hill Queensway Birmingham B4 6GA Telephone: 08081 434 434 General email enquiries: [email protected] Website: www.hs2.org.uk High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has actively considered the needs of blind and partially sighted people in accessing this document. The text will be made available in full on the HS2 website. The text may be freely downloaded and translated by individuals or organisations for conversion into other accessible formats. If you have other needs in this regard please contact High Speed Two (HS2) Limited. © High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, 2020, except where otherwise stated. Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with High Speed Two (HS2) Limited. This information is licensed under the Open Government Licence v2.0. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ version/2 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or e-mail: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third-party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Printed in Great Britain on paper containing at least 75% recycled fibre PFMv9 Assumptions Report Revision: Rev01 Contents 1 Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Community Scrutiny Annual Report
    Appendix 1 SCRUTINY REVIEW PANEL 2 – 2016/2017 TTRRAANNSSPPOORRTT FFIINNAALL RREEPPOORRTT 5 April 2017 Page 1 of 114 CONTENTS Page Contents 2 Chair’s Overview 3 Introduction 5 Methodology 5 Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations 7 Key Learning Points 96 Membership and Attendance 97 Background Information 100 Proposed Recommendations 103 Proposed Recommendations with Officer Comments 105 Page 2 of 114 CHAIR’S OVERVIEW Councillor Aysha Raza (Panel Chair) Tasked with scrutinising Transport in Ealing was a daunting prospect for our Panel, with the subject matter being so very vast. As a non-driver I have been using public transport all my life and know first-hand its strengths and challenges. Ealing is currently facing some major transportation challenges with the progress of Crossrail/Elizabeth Line, possible third runway for Heathrow, HS2 and the huge restructuring of our healthcare. We envisaged looking at our borough's transport connectivity taking these current projects into consideration, with a view to identifying the gaps where provision is limited to find solutions for the residents living there. It is particularly important to have good inter- borough connections with our neighbouring boroughs such as Brent, Hammersmith & Fulham, Harrow, Hillingdon and Hounslow as we will now be expected to access many services such as healthcare provision over the whole North West London area. Connectivity within our borough is key to economic prosperity ensuring people are able to move around our borough with reliable transportation to get to and from work and places of education as well as access our parks and leisure facilities. Health strategies are increasingly focused on prevention and better ageing for our population.
    [Show full text]
  • Gunnersbury Park
    GUNNERSBURY PARK Conservation Area Appraisal Consultation Draft May 2018 GUNNERSBURY PARK l 2 Foreword I am pleased to present the draft Gunnersbury Park Conservation Area Appraisal. Gunnersbury Park is an important part of Brentford and Chiswick and a valuable part of the heritage of the borough. This draft appraisal builds on the original conservation statements for Hounslow’s conservation areas and has been reviewed as part of a comprehensive review of Hounslow’s conservation area statements. The purpose of the appraisal is to provide an overview of historic developments and key components that contribute to the special interest. This appraisal will also identify positive and negative contributors as well as opportunities for improvement in order to inform a comprehensive understanding of the conservation area. The regeneration of the Great West Corridor and Brentford East offers the opportunity to improve the conservation area and its surroundings through high quality new development and improved public UHDOP:HKRSHWKLVGRFXPHQWZLOOSOD\DVLJQL¿FDQWUROHLQWKHIXWXUHPDQDJHPHQWRI*XQQHUVEXU\3DUN Conservation Area and will be a guide for developers, residents and planners. We look forward to hearing your views on the draft appraisal and will amend this where appropriate, following consultation. Steve Curran Councillor Steve Curran Leader of the Council and Cabinet Member for Corporate Strategy, Planning and Regeneration GUNNERSBURY PARK l 3 Executive Summary Presented here is the consultation draft version of the Gunnersbury Park Conservation Area Appraisal. The purpose of a conservation area appraisal is to provide an overview of the historic development of the area and to describe the key components that contribute to the special interest of the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Crossrail 1 Corridor 6 (Richmond/Kingston/Norbiton) Proposal
    Crossrail 1 Corridor 6 (Richmond/Kingston/Norbiton) Proposal Response by London Borough of Hounslow February 2003 Crossrail 1 Corridor 6 (Richmond/Kingston/Norbiton) Proposal: Response by London Borough of Hounslow February 2003 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Context This submission constitutes the London Borough of Hounslow’s response to an invitation to provide initial comments on the Crossrail project’s proposal for a new corridor for Crossrail 1: Corridor 6 – Norbiton, via Old Oak Common, Acton, Chiswick, Richmond and Kingston. The submission considers the proposal in terms of service and amenity for the borough’s residents and businesses, and within the context of the Council’s published policies. In addition to the two options that constitute the Corridor 6 proposals, this submission provides two further options for Crossrail’s consideration. While the Council must record its disappointment that an effective period of less than two weeks was offered for preparation of this submission, the Council also wishes to record its appreciation for the assistance given by the Crossrail consultation team during the preparation of the submission. 1.2 Council Policies The London Borough of Hounslow Unitary Development Plan’s objectives relating to transport and land use development are summarised below: • To promote sustainable transport modes (walking, cycling, public and waterborne transport) which improves access for all members of the community and enhances public transport provision in London as a whole, while reducing car traffic and the demand for road space. • To encourage a pattern of land use, and provision of transport which minimises harm to the environment and reduces the need to travel, especially by car, whilst maximising development opportunities in the Borough.
    [Show full text]
  • A Little Extra Golden Years – Properties with Annex – Our 20-Page Retirement Accommodation P6 Property Supplement P25
    delivered to your door propertyYour paper, local London & Southern Edition May 2016 BUY-TO-LET P3 LONDON NEW HOMES P18 MORTGAGES P23 INTERIORS P62 GARDENING P66 Canaletto – property of the month P8 A little extra Golden years – properties with annex – our 20-page retirement accommodation P6 property supplement P25 Your first stop for Surrey New Homes www.curchods.com What House DPS.indd 3 24/03/2016 15:59:40 London, Kent, Sussex, Surrey, Hampshire, Isle of Wight – Find your new home at Whathouse.com Find your new home at whathouse.com/new-homes buy-to-let 3 Mortgage Advisers What makes a good buy-to-let? Welcome! eorge Osborne’s latest Before you plunge into the buy-to-let property market, there are a number of Budget surprised many of us by hardly touching considerations you should take into account upon the property market, Gbut this year has certainly seen a LOCATION TYPE OF PROPERTY This dramatically affects your sums when great deal of change based on his working out what you’ll charge and what The type of buy-to-let property you policies from the last couple of years. A good location is one where people rental yield you might expect. purchase is related to the type of tenant The first quarter of the year saw want to live. It doesn’t have to be you’re looking to target. Find a type of a surge in activity in the property the cheapest or most expensive area. property which will appeal to the type PROPERTY and mortgage industries as investors It’s an area that has the most of tenant you’re wanting to move in.
    [Show full text]
  • RESPONSE to the SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY TIMETABLE CONSULTATION from OWGRA (Osterley & Wyke Green Residents’ Association)
    RESPONSE TO THE SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY TIMETABLE CONSULTATION FROM OWGRA (Osterley & Wyke Green Residents’ Association) Many of the c 12,000 residents who live in the OWGRA area use Isleworth and Syon Lane stations, which are on the borders of the OWGRA area. Local residents use these stations to commute to school and work, and since Oyster cards have been accepted on this train line, the service has become more frequently used on an ad hoc basis by local residents. We have major reservations about two aspects of the proposed changes: 1) that the direct service to/from Feltham/Ashford/Staines is to be removed 2) that Syon Lane and Isleworth are not to be included in the fast stopping services. 1) Objection to proposed break in connectivity for Isleworth and Syon Lane stations on the Hounslow Loop to Feltham, Ashford and Staines. The reason for this objection is that the service between Brentford and Staines serves an integrated corridor of major employers who require good transport links, widespread family links between the residential areas, educational institutions serving all the communities, health facilities serving the entire corridor, leisure and access to shopping facilities. These all have large catchment areas and rely on good connectivity without any increase in the existing journey times between Isleworth, Syon Lane and the stations beyond Hounslow in this corridor. Examples of some of the significant local traffic include major essential users of the stations along the line who rely on a wider catchment area for staff, customers and services are; Syon Lane Station is heavily used by: - The Green School for Girls and the Green School for Boys (pupils and staff) at Busch Corner - 2 new schools under construction ie Nishkam School and Bolder Academy (pupils and staff) - SKY Media Complex (staff and visitors) - Great West Road Golden Mile - Western End (office employees and residents in current developments).
    [Show full text]
  • Murray Park Management Plan January 2020 – December 2021
    Official Murray Park Management Plan January 2020 – December 2021 1 Official Murray Park Management Plan 2020-21: Foreword Murray Park is an important space for local people and visitors. The London Borough of Richmond upon Thames will maintain and manage the park to the highest standards in accordance with our strategic principles and policies. This management plan is based on the use of an audit of the park following central government guidance known as PPG 17. This is explained within this document but the approach is based on common sense. We believe that it is important to get the simple things right. Is the green space clean and tidy? Is the grass cut? Are the trees and shrubs well maintained? Is any graffiti removed effectively and quickly? Working with local communities to deliver the highest quality of service is top priority and it is hoped that this document will provide a framework for continuing and improving dialogue. The site will be maintained appropriately and the local community will be consulted on any proposed changes or improvements to facilities and infrastructure. In particular, the borough works closely with the Friends of Murray Park. We actively encourage suggestions about all aspects of the park. Parks Officers, working closely with colleagues in Continental Landscapes and using a partnership approach, regularly monitor the park. Members of the local community are also encouraged to let us know their impressions about the level of maintenance as well as their ideas. It is hoped that the resulting observations and ideas will result in continually improving management and maintenance practises.
    [Show full text]
  • REGISTER of SPONSORS (Tiers 2 & 5 and Sub Tiers Only)
    REGISTER OF SPONSORS (Tiers 2 & 5 and Sub Tiers Only) DATE: 09-January-2017 Register of Sponsors Licensed Under the Points-based System This is a list of organisations licensed to sponsor migrants under Tiers 2 & 5 of the Points-Based System. It shows the organisation's name (in alphabetical order), the sub tier(s) they are licensed for, and their rating against each sub tier. A sponsor may be licensed under more than one tier, and may have different ratings for each tier. No. of Sponsors on Register Licensed under Tiers 2 and 5: 29,794 Organisation Name Town/City County Tier & Rating Sub Tier ?What If! Ltd London Tier 2 (A rating) Tier 2 General Tier 2 (A rating) Intra Company Transfers (ICT) @ Home Accommodation Services Ltd London Tier 2 (A rating) Tier 2 General Tier 5 (A rating) Creative & Sporting ]performance s p a c e [ london london Tier 5 (A rating) Creative & Sporting 01 Telecom Limited Brighton Tier 2 (A rating) Tier 2 General 0-two Maintenance London Tier 2 (A rating) Tier 2 General 1 Stop Print Ltd Ilford Tier 2 (A rating) Tier 2 General 1 Tech LTD London Tier 2 (A rating) Tier 2 General 10 Europe Limited Edinburgh Tier 2 (A rating) Tier 2 General Tier 2 (A rating) Intra Company Transfers (ICT) 10 GROUP LTD T/A THE 10 GROUP LONDON Tier 2 (A rating) Tier 2 General 10 Minutes With Limited London Tier 2 (A rating) Tier 2 General Page 1 of 1952 Organisation Name Town/City County Tier & Rating Sub Tier 1000heads Ltd London Tier 2 (A rating) Tier 2 General 1000mercis LTD London Tier 2 (A rating) Tier 2 General 100Starlings Ltd
    [Show full text]