Community Scrutiny Annual Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Community Scrutiny Annual Report Appendix 1 SCRUTINY REVIEW PANEL 2 – 2016/2017 TTRRAANNSSPPOORRTT FFIINNAALL RREEPPOORRTT 5 April 2017 Page 1 of 114 CONTENTS Page Contents 2 Chair’s Overview 3 Introduction 5 Methodology 5 Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations 7 Key Learning Points 96 Membership and Attendance 97 Background Information 100 Proposed Recommendations 103 Proposed Recommendations with Officer Comments 105 Page 2 of 114 CHAIR’S OVERVIEW Councillor Aysha Raza (Panel Chair) Tasked with scrutinising Transport in Ealing was a daunting prospect for our Panel, with the subject matter being so very vast. As a non-driver I have been using public transport all my life and know first-hand its strengths and challenges. Ealing is currently facing some major transportation challenges with the progress of Crossrail/Elizabeth Line, possible third runway for Heathrow, HS2 and the huge restructuring of our healthcare. We envisaged looking at our borough's transport connectivity taking these current projects into consideration, with a view to identifying the gaps where provision is limited to find solutions for the residents living there. It is particularly important to have good inter- borough connections with our neighbouring boroughs such as Brent, Hammersmith & Fulham, Harrow, Hillingdon and Hounslow as we will now be expected to access many services such as healthcare provision over the whole North West London area. Connectivity within our borough is key to economic prosperity ensuring people are able to move around our borough with reliable transportation to get to and from work and places of education as well as access our parks and leisure facilities. Health strategies are increasingly focused on prevention and better ageing for our population. With public health firmly back as a Council responsibility we need to encourage our residents to be more active and lead longer healthier lives in Ealing. Increased exercise is at the centre of our health strategy and as such we must encourage more walking and cycling. Schemes, such as the walking school buses, must be encouraged at all schools which would prevent the unpleasant traffic jams outside schools as well as yield enormous health benefits. Page 3 of 114 The Mayor of London; Sadiq Khan, has pledged to improve London's increasingly poor levels of air quality which can only be achieved with a marked reduction in vehicles. As the queen of the suburbs, famed for our green spaces we need to play our part in this important environmental policy in the capital. Buses on our networks are becoming increasingly green with a view to becoming completely electric fleets. Cars too are encouraged to wean off polluting fuels and become electric. Unprecedented pressures on housing have led to the development of the Southall old gasworks site and the old Glaxo site in Greenford, these will be thousands of homes, increasing the pressures on our existing ageing transport network. It is imperative that we make robust transport plans for these new communities to thrive and not just become isolated corners of Ealing. Our Panel has looked at the most used modes of public transport in Ealing with meetings on rail, underground, buses and pedestrian access. We have managed to invite speakers from TfL, GWR, Crossrail, and TfL buses to name a few, and discuss extensively the challenges our transport network currently faces. I have also tried to encourage the Panel members to experience first-hand the issues raised at meetings. I would like to thank Ealing Council staff in preparing reports and background for all our meetings, those that came in to inform us further on their particular specialisms. Our field trips added experience, to see for ourselves the practicalities and challenges of using public transport in Ealing. Particular thanks to Harjeet Bains and Lee Teasdale for their support with this Panel. Also, Russell Roberts and Chris Cole from our Transport department; John Gashion from EPTUG; James Guest and Alan Cook from Ealing Healthwatch for their hard work supplying us with very detailed background. I trust it is an insightful report into the current state of our transport network in Ealing on which we can build and improve. There were many other avenues we would have liked to explore to give a more comprehensive account and we hope to do this next year by extending this Panel's work. We hope to carry out a residents’ survey to produce a user friendly Transport connectivity map of the borough for transport links during the day and night to complete our work. Page 4 of 114 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 The main purpose of Scrutiny Review Panel 2 – 2016/2017: Transport was to consider how public transport connectivity and walking/pedestrian routes in the borough could be improved. 1.2 The scope of the Panel was to consider the following four key areas relating to the transport systems in the borough: - Borough Connectivity (an overview of using public transport in the borough) - Rail Connectivity (e.g. tube/night tube, overground, etc.) - Walking/Pedestrian Routes (including school travel plans, accessibility on the pavements and within parks/open spaces, etc.) - Bus Connectivity (easier and safer journeys e.g. hospitals, joining hubs, etc.) 1.3 The Panel agreed that its overarching remit would be to look at how public transport use could augment and support pedestrians in the borough, encouraging healthier living and a move away from private vehicles, which in turn would support the local and wider environment. 2.0 METHODOLOGY General 2.1 The Panel received reports and presentations from internal services, external agencies and expert witnesses at their meetings. There were five scheduled meetings in the year held in Ealing Town Hall. The Panel decided to devote a single meeting to each of the four selected key areas. The Panel also conducted several site visits within and outside the Borough which complemented this work. Co-option 2.2 The Panel co-opted Mr John Gashion (Vice Chairman, Ealing Passenger Transport Users’ Group) onto the Panel at the first meeting. The Ealing Passenger Transport Users’ Group (EPTUG) is a volunteer group which was founded in 2001. It acts as a pressure group for the local transport users and is a conduit to the Council, Transport for London (TfL) and other transport bodies that are involved in the local transport systems. Site Visits 2.3 The following site visits were undertaken: Within the Borough • Ealing Civic Society Lecture on Crossrail and its Impact in Ealing to learn more about the developments to date. • Blair Peach Primary School, Beaconsfield Road, Southall, Middlesex to observe their walking bus for the 8.45am school start. • Grand Union Canal, Southall (from behind Blair Peach Primary School to Uxbridge Road) to see the unchanged and the transformed towpaths along this part of the canal. Page 5 of 114 • Southall Broadway to see the unchanged and the highly acclaimed revamped pavements. • South Road, Southall to see the relatively narrow unaltered and restored pavements in existence. Outside the Borough • 40 years of Railways in London, Crossrail HQ, Institute of Civil Engineering to get a better grasp of the challenges of upgrading the railways in London. • Shadowing a Tube Driver on the Central Line to see the driver’s perspective of a busy tube line and the other side of the journey. • Launch of Night Tube at Brixton and Oxford Circus Stations to attend the official launch of the night tube with the Mayor of London. • A trial bus journey from Dominion Centre (112 The Green, Southall, Middx, UB2 4BQ) to Northwick Park Hospital, Watford Road, Harrow, Middx, HA1 3UJ) to test whether this could be accomplished with relative ease using a hopper bus ticket. Publicity 2.4 The Panel’s work was publicised in the Council’s free magazine (Around Ealing), website and by direct emails. A Panel Meeting Page 6 of 114 3.0 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Background 3.1 The Panel received an overview of the public transport connectivity in the borough from Chris Cole (Transport Projects and Policy Manager) and Russell Roberts (Principal Transport Planner) as well as a presentation from John Gashion (Co-opted Member) on the work of Ealing Passenger Transport Users’ Group at the first meeting. At the three subsequent meetings, the Panel undertook detailed reviews of rail/tube connectivity, walking/pedestrian routes and bus connectivity. The respective service officers and external partners were invited to these meetings. The most common themes that featured across all the modes considered were Crossrail, capacity, frequency, infrastructure and accessibility. Associated Legislation 3.2 The fundamental legislation associated with the local transport matters includes: Transport for London is a statutory body created by the Greater London Authority Act 1999. 3.3 S141 (1) of the Greater London Authority Act 1999 gives the Mayor of London a general duty to develop and implement policies to promote and encourage safe, integrated, efficient and economic transport facilities and services to, from and within London. 3.4 By virtue of s154 (3) (b) of the Act TfL has a duty to facilitate the discharge of the duties under s141 (1). 3.5 TfL also has a power under s173 to provide or secure the provision of public passenger transport services to, from or within Greater London. 3.6 The Council is required to adopt a Local Implementation Plan (a LIP) which is a statutory plan prepared under Section 145 of the Act to set out how it will implement the London Mayor’s Transport Strategy within Ealing. Each borough’s LIP must demonstrate how it will contribute to the Mayor’s goals, strategies and outcomes, as well as other local and sub-regional goals. 3.7 The Greater London Authority Act 1999 also made TfL responsible for the planning and operation of aspects of the London transport system including the Underground network.
Recommended publications
  • London Borough of Hounslow the Civic Centre Lampton Road Hounslow TW3 4DN
    London Borough of Hounslow The Civic Centre Lampton Road Hounslow TW3 4DN Committee Services If you require further information about this agenda please contact: Carol Stiles Tel. 020 8583 2066 or email [email protected]. CHISWICK AREA COMMITTEE (MONITORING) A meeting of the Chiswick Area Committee (Monitoring) will be held in The Hogarth Hall, Chiswick Town Hall, Heathfield Terrace, Chiswick W4 on Wednesday, 10 December 2003 at 7:30 pm MEMBERSHIP Councillor Lynch- Chair Councillors Barwood, Gilson, Day, Thompson, Lee, Kinghorn, Davies and Oulds. Co-optees - David Beattie and David Hopkins AGENDA PART I - ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION WHILE THE PRESS AND PUBLIC ARE IN ATTENDANCE 1. Apologies for absence, declarations of interest or any other communications from Members 2. Minutes of the meeting held on 12 November 2003 (Pages 1 - 17) Public Forum The Open Forum will take place as close as possible to 9.00 p.m. for approximately 20 minutes. Members of the public may raise matters of local concern. Please bear in mind the guidelines for public participation and that it may not be possible to have a detailed discussion or response at the meeting. Points raised will be noted and used to inform the work of the Area Committee. Protocol for the Open Forum ♦ Written items to be submitted where possible. (Proformas will be available at the back of the hall). ♦ Where they are so submitted this should be by 8.30 p.m. ♦ Speakers will be allowed at the Chair’s discretion. ♦ The Chair will normally only allow one contribution per person per item and one item per person per meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 No 3 September.Pdf
    WEST MIDDLESEX FAMILY HISTORY SOCIETY Executive Committee Chairman Mrs Yvonne Masson [email protected] Vice Chairman Jim Devine Secretary Tony Simpson 32 The Avenue, Bedford Park, Chiswick W4 1HT [email protected] Treasurer Paul Kershaw 241 Waldegrave Road, Twickenham TW1 4SY [email protected] Membership Secretary Mrs June Watkins 22 Chalmers Road, Ashford, Middlesex TW15 1DT [email protected] Editor Mrs Pam Smith 23 Worple Road, Ashford, Middlesex TW15 1DT [email protected] Committee Members Mike Cordery Kay Dudman Chris Hern Brian Page Maggie Mold Programme Secretary Mrs. Maggie Mold 48 Darby Crescent, Sunbury-on-Thames Middlesex TW16 5LA Society Web site http://www.west-middlesex-fhs.org.uk/ Subscriptions All Categories: £10.00 per annum Subscription year l January to 31 December Examiners Lee Goodchild and Muriel Sprott In all correspondence please mark your envelope WMFHS in the upper left-hand corner; if a reply is needed, a SAE/IRCs must be enclosed. Members are asked to note that receipts are only sent by request, if return postage is included. Published by West Middlesex Family History Society Registered Charity No. 291906 WEST MIDDLESEX FAMILY HISTORY SOCIETY JOURNAL Volume 24 Number 3 September 2006 Contents Future meetings …………………………………………….. 2 News Roundup ……………………………………………... 3 WMFHS Noticeboard ……………………………………… 4 West Middlesex FHS Tape Library from 1992 ……………. 9 A Remarkable Addendum to the Story of the Unconventional Great Aunt ………………………………... 11 A Very Victorian Affair ……………………………………. 12 Was Your Ancestor a Police Officer? ……………………… 21 Visit to Brookwood Cemetery in July 2006 ………………... 22 Alice German RN, USA …………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Pfmv9 Assumptions Report
    PFMv9 Assumptions Report May 2020 © HS2 Ltd www.hs2.org.uk High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has been tasked by the Department for Transport (DfT) with managing the delivery of a new national high speed rail network. It is a non-departmental public body wholly owned by the DfT. High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, Two Snowhill Snow Hill Queensway Birmingham B4 6GA Telephone: 08081 434 434 General email enquiries: [email protected] Website: www.hs2.org.uk High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has actively considered the needs of blind and partially sighted people in accessing this document. The text will be made available in full on the HS2 website. The text may be freely downloaded and translated by individuals or organisations for conversion into other accessible formats. If you have other needs in this regard please contact High Speed Two (HS2) Limited. © High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, 2020, except where otherwise stated. Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with High Speed Two (HS2) Limited. This information is licensed under the Open Government Licence v2.0. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ version/2 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or e-mail: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third-party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Printed in Great Britain on paper containing at least 75% recycled fibre PFMv9 Assumptions Report Revision: Rev01 Contents 1 Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Gunnersbury Park
    GUNNERSBURY PARK Conservation Area Appraisal Consultation Draft May 2018 GUNNERSBURY PARK l 2 Foreword I am pleased to present the draft Gunnersbury Park Conservation Area Appraisal. Gunnersbury Park is an important part of Brentford and Chiswick and a valuable part of the heritage of the borough. This draft appraisal builds on the original conservation statements for Hounslow’s conservation areas and has been reviewed as part of a comprehensive review of Hounslow’s conservation area statements. The purpose of the appraisal is to provide an overview of historic developments and key components that contribute to the special interest. This appraisal will also identify positive and negative contributors as well as opportunities for improvement in order to inform a comprehensive understanding of the conservation area. The regeneration of the Great West Corridor and Brentford East offers the opportunity to improve the conservation area and its surroundings through high quality new development and improved public UHDOP:HKRSHWKLVGRFXPHQWZLOOSOD\DVLJQL¿FDQWUROHLQWKHIXWXUHPDQDJHPHQWRI*XQQHUVEXU\3DUN Conservation Area and will be a guide for developers, residents and planners. We look forward to hearing your views on the draft appraisal and will amend this where appropriate, following consultation. Steve Curran Councillor Steve Curran Leader of the Council and Cabinet Member for Corporate Strategy, Planning and Regeneration GUNNERSBURY PARK l 3 Executive Summary Presented here is the consultation draft version of the Gunnersbury Park Conservation Area Appraisal. The purpose of a conservation area appraisal is to provide an overview of the historic development of the area and to describe the key components that contribute to the special interest of the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Crossrail 1 Corridor 6 (Richmond/Kingston/Norbiton) Proposal
    Crossrail 1 Corridor 6 (Richmond/Kingston/Norbiton) Proposal Response by London Borough of Hounslow February 2003 Crossrail 1 Corridor 6 (Richmond/Kingston/Norbiton) Proposal: Response by London Borough of Hounslow February 2003 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Context This submission constitutes the London Borough of Hounslow’s response to an invitation to provide initial comments on the Crossrail project’s proposal for a new corridor for Crossrail 1: Corridor 6 – Norbiton, via Old Oak Common, Acton, Chiswick, Richmond and Kingston. The submission considers the proposal in terms of service and amenity for the borough’s residents and businesses, and within the context of the Council’s published policies. In addition to the two options that constitute the Corridor 6 proposals, this submission provides two further options for Crossrail’s consideration. While the Council must record its disappointment that an effective period of less than two weeks was offered for preparation of this submission, the Council also wishes to record its appreciation for the assistance given by the Crossrail consultation team during the preparation of the submission. 1.2 Council Policies The London Borough of Hounslow Unitary Development Plan’s objectives relating to transport and land use development are summarised below: • To promote sustainable transport modes (walking, cycling, public and waterborne transport) which improves access for all members of the community and enhances public transport provision in London as a whole, while reducing car traffic and the demand for road space. • To encourage a pattern of land use, and provision of transport which minimises harm to the environment and reduces the need to travel, especially by car, whilst maximising development opportunities in the Borough.
    [Show full text]
  • RESPONSE to the SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY TIMETABLE CONSULTATION from OWGRA (Osterley & Wyke Green Residents’ Association)
    RESPONSE TO THE SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY TIMETABLE CONSULTATION FROM OWGRA (Osterley & Wyke Green Residents’ Association) Many of the c 12,000 residents who live in the OWGRA area use Isleworth and Syon Lane stations, which are on the borders of the OWGRA area. Local residents use these stations to commute to school and work, and since Oyster cards have been accepted on this train line, the service has become more frequently used on an ad hoc basis by local residents. We have major reservations about two aspects of the proposed changes: 1) that the direct service to/from Feltham/Ashford/Staines is to be removed 2) that Syon Lane and Isleworth are not to be included in the fast stopping services. 1) Objection to proposed break in connectivity for Isleworth and Syon Lane stations on the Hounslow Loop to Feltham, Ashford and Staines. The reason for this objection is that the service between Brentford and Staines serves an integrated corridor of major employers who require good transport links, widespread family links between the residential areas, educational institutions serving all the communities, health facilities serving the entire corridor, leisure and access to shopping facilities. These all have large catchment areas and rely on good connectivity without any increase in the existing journey times between Isleworth, Syon Lane and the stations beyond Hounslow in this corridor. Examples of some of the significant local traffic include major essential users of the stations along the line who rely on a wider catchment area for staff, customers and services are; Syon Lane Station is heavily used by: - The Green School for Girls and the Green School for Boys (pupils and staff) at Busch Corner - 2 new schools under construction ie Nishkam School and Bolder Academy (pupils and staff) - SKY Media Complex (staff and visitors) - Great West Road Golden Mile - Western End (office employees and residents in current developments).
    [Show full text]
  • Murray Park Management Plan January 2020 – December 2021
    Official Murray Park Management Plan January 2020 – December 2021 1 Official Murray Park Management Plan 2020-21: Foreword Murray Park is an important space for local people and visitors. The London Borough of Richmond upon Thames will maintain and manage the park to the highest standards in accordance with our strategic principles and policies. This management plan is based on the use of an audit of the park following central government guidance known as PPG 17. This is explained within this document but the approach is based on common sense. We believe that it is important to get the simple things right. Is the green space clean and tidy? Is the grass cut? Are the trees and shrubs well maintained? Is any graffiti removed effectively and quickly? Working with local communities to deliver the highest quality of service is top priority and it is hoped that this document will provide a framework for continuing and improving dialogue. The site will be maintained appropriately and the local community will be consulted on any proposed changes or improvements to facilities and infrastructure. In particular, the borough works closely with the Friends of Murray Park. We actively encourage suggestions about all aspects of the park. Parks Officers, working closely with colleagues in Continental Landscapes and using a partnership approach, regularly monitor the park. Members of the local community are also encouraged to let us know their impressions about the level of maintenance as well as their ideas. It is hoped that the resulting observations and ideas will result in continually improving management and maintenance practises.
    [Show full text]
  • REGISTER of SPONSORS (Tiers 2 & 5 and Sub Tiers Only)
    REGISTER OF SPONSORS (Tiers 2 & 5 and Sub Tiers Only) DATE: 09-January-2017 Register of Sponsors Licensed Under the Points-based System This is a list of organisations licensed to sponsor migrants under Tiers 2 & 5 of the Points-Based System. It shows the organisation's name (in alphabetical order), the sub tier(s) they are licensed for, and their rating against each sub tier. A sponsor may be licensed under more than one tier, and may have different ratings for each tier. No. of Sponsors on Register Licensed under Tiers 2 and 5: 29,794 Organisation Name Town/City County Tier & Rating Sub Tier ?What If! Ltd London Tier 2 (A rating) Tier 2 General Tier 2 (A rating) Intra Company Transfers (ICT) @ Home Accommodation Services Ltd London Tier 2 (A rating) Tier 2 General Tier 5 (A rating) Creative & Sporting ]performance s p a c e [ london london Tier 5 (A rating) Creative & Sporting 01 Telecom Limited Brighton Tier 2 (A rating) Tier 2 General 0-two Maintenance London Tier 2 (A rating) Tier 2 General 1 Stop Print Ltd Ilford Tier 2 (A rating) Tier 2 General 1 Tech LTD London Tier 2 (A rating) Tier 2 General 10 Europe Limited Edinburgh Tier 2 (A rating) Tier 2 General Tier 2 (A rating) Intra Company Transfers (ICT) 10 GROUP LTD T/A THE 10 GROUP LONDON Tier 2 (A rating) Tier 2 General 10 Minutes With Limited London Tier 2 (A rating) Tier 2 General Page 1 of 1952 Organisation Name Town/City County Tier & Rating Sub Tier 1000heads Ltd London Tier 2 (A rating) Tier 2 General 1000mercis LTD London Tier 2 (A rating) Tier 2 General 100Starlings Ltd
    [Show full text]
  • Better Local Government
    Agenda Item No. Reference No. Better Local Government CHISWICK AREA COMMITTEE (MONITORING) 12 NOVEMBER 2003 CROSSRAIL BENCHMARK SCHEME AND OPTIONS 5 & 6 Report by: Assistant Chief Executive, Corporate Policy and Regeneration SUMMARY This report provides an update on the current status of the Crossrail project including the “Crossrail Benchmark Scheme”, and introduces LB Hounslow’s proposed alternative Options 5 and 6 for discussion. 1. RECOMMENDATION 1.1 That members note the current Crossrail Benchmark Scheme and endorse the Council’s proposal to submit Options 5 and 6 to Crossrail with a request for their evaluation against the Benchmark Scheme. 2. BACKGROUND 2.1 Crossrail is a proposed new rail service being developed by Cross London Rail Links Ltd (CLRLL), a 50/50 joint venture between Transport for London (TfL) and the Strategic Rail Authority (SRA). The Crossrail project comprises two proposed schemes - Crossrail Line 1 and Crossrail Line 2. 2.2 Crossrail Line 1 would be a high capacity east-west rail link across London serving Heathrow, the West End, the City and the Docklands. This proposal, now referred to as the “Crossrail Benchmark Scheme”, was formally unveiled by CLRLL in a Business Case Summary launch on 8 September 2003. 2.3 The Benchmark Scheme comprises four routes sharing a new tunnel under central London from Paddington to the East End. The tunnel would carry 24 trains/hour in peak periods. The proposed routes are:- • Heathrow corridor (6 trains/hour) replacing the Heathrow Express (4 trains/hour) subject to agreement with BAA and stopping also at Hayes & Harlington and Ealing Broadway.
    [Show full text]
  • Routes E8 110 H28 And
    D Consultation on possible changes to bus services in Hounslow, Ealing and Twickenham (E8 110 H28 635) Consultation Report March 2016 1 2 Consultation on possible bus changes to bus services in Hounslow, Ealing and Twickenham Consultation Report 3 Contents 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 2 2 The consultation ............................................................................................................. 3 3 Responses from members of the public ......................................................................... 6 4 Responses from statutory bodies and other stakeholders ............................................ 51 5 Summary and conclusions ........................................................................................... 56 Appendix A – Consultation leaflet ....................................................................................... 58 Appendix B – Leaflet distribution area ................................................................................ 71 Appendix C – List of stakeholders consulted ...................................................................... 72 Appendix D - Letter sent to residents of Amhurst Gardens and Alton Close ....................... 76 Appendix E - Petition received from residents of Amhurst Gardens and Alton Close ......... 80 Appendix F – Public meeting to discuss proposed changes to H28 bus route .................... 81 Appendix G – Questionnaire ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 6.2.04 Environmental Statement
    Thames Tideway Tunnel Thames Water Utilities Limited Application for Development Consent Application Reference Number: WWO10001 Environmental Statement Doc Ref: 6.2.04 Volume 4: Acton Storm Tanks appendices APFP Regulations 2009: Regulation 5(2)(a) Environmental StatementEnvironmental Volume 4: Volume Acton appendices Storm Tanks Hard copy available in Box 18 Folder B January 2013 This page is intentionally blank Environmental Statement Thames Tideway Tunnel Environmental Statement List of contents Non technical summary Environmental Statement glossary and abbreviations Volume 1 Introduction to the Environmental Statement Volume 2 Environmental assessment methodology Volume 3 Project-wide effects assessment Volume 4 Acton Storm Tanks site assessment Volume 5 Hammersmith Pumping Station site assessment Volume 6 Barn Elms site assessment Volume 7 Putney Embankment Foreshore site assessment Volume 8 Dormay Street site assessment Volume 9 King George’s Park site assessment Volume 10 Carnwath Road Riverside site assessment Volume 11 Falconbrook Pumping Station site assessment Volume 12 Cremorne Wharf Depot site assessment Volume 13 Chelsea Embankment Foreshore site assessment Volume 14 Kirtling Street site assessment Volume 15 Heathwall Pumping Station site assessment Volume 16 Albert Embankment Foreshore site assessment Volume 17 Victoria Embankment Foreshore site assessment Volume 18 Blackfriars Bridge Foreshore site assessment Volume 19 Shad Thames Pumping Station site assessment Volume 20 Chambers Wharf site assessment Volume 21 King Edward
    [Show full text]
  • Index to the HMRS Journal This Is a File Combining the Separate Pdf Format Files for Each of the First 21 Volumes of Our Journal
    Index to the HMRS Journal This is a file combining the separate pdf format files for each of the first 21 volumes of our Journal. It should be noted that the layout of the indices has changed from time to time over this period. It should be noted that the original document was scanned and processed by OCR software so may contain errors. (Andrew Nummelin, webmaster 6/7/2006) INDEX Volume 1 Illustrated articles denoted thus * Accidents, Railway Safety Regulations and 153 Affiliation with Railway Correspondence & Travel Society 116 Alley, G.D.S. - Lecture by 107 Anglia. Hibernia and Wanglia - Railways of 106 Annual General Meetings 58, 85, 117, 157 Archivist, H.M.R.S. 39 Badge, H.M.R.S. 156 Barnard, C.J. Lecture by 106 Barrie, D.S.M. Lecture by 84 Bassett-Lowke, W.J. 99 Between ourselves 3, 19, 35, 51, 67, 82, 98, 114, 130, 146, 163, 178 Book Reviews 12, 44, 62, 79, 134, 190 Brecon & Merthyr Railway locomotives 95 British Museum copying service 23 Bruton, J.F. - Lecture by 108 Burry Port & Gwendraeth Valley Railway locomotives 95 Caledonian Railway - 0-4-2 goods locomotives 167 * - Locomotives of 21, 54 - Relics 4 Cambrian Railways 95 Casserley, H.C. - Lecture by 70 catalogues. old model 189 Centenaries - Glasgow & South Western Railway 13 - Great North of Scotland Railway 170 - Highland Railway 178 - North Eastern Railway 147 Charing Cross station in the '60s 155 * Chimney, Modelling Jones' Highland Railway 188 Coaching Stook - Modelling of old time 11 - London & North Western Railway 132 *, 151 - Midland Railway 76 * - Modelling of Great Western Railway pre-grouping 74 - Review of pre-grouping 25 Commercial models, Old 37 Copying service, British Museum 23 Ccurtice-Relph-Harrison control for model Locomotives 14, 52 Day, R.C.J.
    [Show full text]