DOCSLIB.ORG

M25 South West Quadrant Strategic Study: Evidence Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
M25 South West Quadrant Strategic Study: Evidence Report M25 South West Quadrant Strategic Study Evidence Report M25 South West Quadrant Strategic Study: Evidence Report Contents 0. Executive Summary ................................................................................................9 0.1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................9 0.2 Policy context ...........................................................................................................9 0.3 Previous studies ........................................................................................................9 0.4 Economic conditions ..............................................................................................10 0.5 Existing road network ............................................................................................. 11 0.6 Existing public transport network ............................................................................ 13 0.7 Environmental considerations ................................................................................. 14 1 Introduction ...........................................................................................................15 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 15 1.2 Problem identification .............................................................................................. 15 1.3 Study objectives ..................................................................................................... 16 1.4 Study tasks ............................................................................................................. 17 1.5 Defining the study area ........................................................................................... 17 1.6 The M25 ................................................................................................................. 19 1.7 Population and workforce ....................................................................................... 19 1.8 Local Enterprise Partnerships .................................................................................20 1.9 Stakeholders ...........................................................................................................21 1.10 Report structure .....................................................................................................21 2 Background and Context .....................................................................................22 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................22 2.2 Economic policy .....................................................................................................22 2.3 Transport policy ......................................................................................................22 2.4 Planning policy ........................................................................................................25 2.5 Environmental policy ...............................................................................................26 2.6 Previous studies ......................................................................................................29 2.7 Key findings – Policy context ...................................................................................34 1 M25 South West Quadrant Strategic Study: Evidence Report 2.8 Key findings – Previous studies ...............................................................................35 3 Existing Economic Conditions .............................................................................36 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................36 3.2 Economic performance and activity ........................................................................36 3.3 Economic indicators by Local Enterprise Partnership ..............................................38 3.4 Spatial analysis of two key employment sectors ...................................................... 41 3.5 Travel and economic activity ...................................................................................49 3.6 Economic role of airports ........................................................................................54 3.7 Key findings – Economic conditions in the M25SWQ ..............................................57 4 Existing Road Conditions ....................................................................................59 4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................59 4.2 Key traffic movements ............................................................................................60 4.3 Trip lengths .............................................................................................................61 4.4 Trip origins and destinations ....................................................................................61 4.5 Route performance .................................................................................................64 4.6 Freight ....................................................................................................................75 4.7 Road safety ............................................................................................................76 4.8 Resilience ...............................................................................................................77 4.9 Routes parallel to the M25 ......................................................................................78 4.10 Key findings – Road conditions ...............................................................................82 5 Existing Public Transport Conditions ..................................................................84 5.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................84 5.2 Rail network ............................................................................................................84 5.3 Existing rail usage ...................................................................................................88 5.4 Comparison with other modes ................................................................................93 5.5 Bus and coach .......................................................................................................94 5.6 Key findings – Public transport ................................................................................97 6 Existing Environmental Conditions .....................................................................98 6.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................98 2 M25 South West Quadrant Strategic Study: Evidence Report 6.2 Immediate M25 corridor ..........................................................................................98 6.3 Summary of environmental designations in the M25SWQ corridor ........................100 6.4 Environmental designations in the wider study area .............................................. 102 6.5 Key findings – Environmental conditions ...............................................................105 7 Future Conditions ...............................................................................................106 7.1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................106 7.2 Third party growth forecasts .................................................................................106 7.3 Committed development ...................................................................................... 114 7.4 Airport capacity .....................................................................................................117 7.5 Committed transport investment ........................................................................... 118 7.6 Key findings – Future conditions ............................................................................ 121 8 Study Objectives ................................................................................................ 122 9 References .......................................................................................................... 123 List of tables Table 3-1: Selected economic indicators by LEP ..................................................................38 Table 3-2: Top ten employment clusters within 5 miles of M25SWQ .....................................49 Table 4-1: Journeys on selected M25SWQ sections by length ..............................................61 Table 4-2: Summary of traffic volumes ..................................................................................65 Table 4-3: Accident rates on M25SWQ (2012-2014) Personal Injury Accidents/million vehiclekilometres (PIA/mvkm) .................................................................................76 Table 4-4: Number of accidents at junctions on the M25SWQ ..............................................76 Table 6-1: Summary and importance of environmental designations in the M25 corridor .... 101 Table 7-1: Hertfordshire’s growth areas - headline statistics ................................................108 Table 7-2: 2015 Road Traffic Forecasts ..............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HA16 Rivers and Streams London's Rivers and Streams Resource
    HA16 Rivers and Streams Definition All free-flowing watercourses above the tidal limit London’s rivers and streams resource The total length of watercourses (not including those with a tidal influence) are provided in table 1a and 1b. These figures are based on catchment areas and do not include all watercourses or small watercourses such as drainage ditches. Table 1a: Catchment area and length of fresh water rivers and streams in SE London Watercourse name Length (km) Catchment area (km2) Hogsmill 9.9 73 Surbiton stream 6.0 Bonesgate stream 5.0 Horton stream 5.3 Greens lane stream 1.8 Ewel court stream 2.7 Hogsmill stream 0.5 Beverley Brook 14.3 64 Kingsmere stream 3.1 Penponds overflow 1.3 Queensmere stream 2.4 Keswick avenue ditch 1.2 Cannizaro park stream 1.7 Coombe Brook 1 Pyl Brook 5.3 East Pyl Brook 3.9 old pyl ditch 0.7 Merton ditch culvert 4.3 Grand drive ditch 0.5 Wandle 26.7 202 Wimbledon park stream 1.6 Railway ditch 1.1 Summerstown ditch 2.2 Graveney/ Norbury brook 9.5 Figgs marsh ditch 3.6 Bunces ditch 1.2 Pickle ditch 0.9 Morden Hall loop 2.5 Beddington corner branch 0.7 Beddington effluent ditch 1.6 Oily ditch 3.9 Cemetery ditch 2.8 Therapia ditch 0.9 Micham road new culvert 2.1 Station farm ditch 0.7 Ravenbourne 17.4 180 Quaggy (kyd Brook) 5.6 Quaggy hither green 1 Grove park ditch 0.5 Milk street ditch 0.3 Ravensbourne honor oak 1.9 Pool river 5.1 Chaffinch Brook 4.4 Spring Brook 1.6 The Beck 7.8 St James stream 2.8 Nursery stream 3.3 Konstamm ditch 0.4 River Cray 12.6 45 River Shuttle 6.4 Wincham Stream 5.6 Marsh Dykes
    [Show full text]
  • BERKSHIRE PROSPECTUS AMBITION, COLLABORATION and GROWTH Thames Valley Berkshire LEP Berkshire Prospectus Local Authorities As Well As Other Key Stakeholders
    BERKSHIRE PROSPECTUS AMBITION, COLLABORATION AND GROWTH 02 THE BERKSHIRE Berkshire Prospectus Berkshire PROSPECTUS THE OPPORTUNITIES IN THIS PROSPECTUS It is no coincidence that this prospectus for Berkshire has been released in tandem with the Thames Valley Berkshire Local Enterprise Partnership (LEP) Recovery and REPRESENT A CHANCE Renewal Plan. The two documents sit alongside each other, evidencing the formidable collaborative nature of how TO RESET POST COVID the LEP is working in partnership with the six Berkshire Local Authorities as well as other key stakeholders. AND MAKE BERKSHIRE This prospectus clearly identifies several key schemes and projects which, when delivered, will greatly enhance Berkshire’s appeal as a place to live and EVEN BETTER work in the years ahead. The projects highlighted in this prospectus represent unique opportunities for new investment that will appeal to a wide range of partners, locally, regionally and nationally. The LEP and Local Authorities will work alongside private and public sector colleagues to facilitate the development and successful delivery of these great opportunities. COLLABORATIVE WORKING We should highlight the constructive partnership between the Local Authorities and the LEP, who together have forged a great working relationship with One Public Estate (OPE). Established in 2013, OPE now works nationally with more than 300 councils.These projects are transforming local communities and public services right across the country. They provide technical support and funding to councils to deliver ambitious property and place-focused programmes in collaboration with central government and other public sector partners. Thames Valley Berkshire LEP Berkshire Thames Valley 03 As highlighted in the Recovery and Renewal Plan, Thames Valley Berkshire is more than the sum of its parts.
    [Show full text]
  • Written Evidence Submitted by Colne Valley Fisheries Consultative
    Colne Valley Fisheries Consultative WQR0011 Written evidence submitted by Colne Valley Fisheries Consultative 1. The Colne Valley Fisheries Consultative is based in the Colne Valley, Hertfordshire and represents fishery and conservation interests in the waterscapes of the River Colne, Mimmshall Brook, Upper Colne, Ellen Brook, R Ver, R Bulbourne, R Gade, R Chess, R Misbourne, Shires Ditch, Alder Bourne, Pymmes Brook, R Brent or Crane, Frays River, R Pinn, Bigley Ditch, Poyle Channel, Colne Brook, Wraysbury River, Bonehead Ditch, Duke of Northumberland’s River, Longford River, R Ash and the many lakes which hold water in the lands surrounding the rivers. 2. The rivers to the west of the catchment are all important chalk streams draining the Chilterns. The same chalk aquifer provides much of the water for consumption to Affinity Water, the supply company, and to Thames Water which has responsibility for waste water and sewage. 3. The Grand Union Canal runs into and out of the rivers Bulbourne, Gade and Colne and the whole system is a tributary of the River Thames. 4. Membership of the Consultative is open and presently it represents about forty angling clubs with local water holdings with a combined individual membership in the regions of 50,000. Many Londoners use the Colne Valley as their local wild place for angling, walking, sailing, boating, running and cycling with good communication links to and from the city. 5. The Consultative works in partnership with many stakeholders; the individual river groups, Herts & Middlesex Wildlife Trust, London Wildlife Trust, Colne Valley Regional Park, The Environment Agency, TW and AW, Angling Trust, Fish Legal, Wild Trout Trust and many others.
    [Show full text]
  • Candidates for the Thames Valley Police Force Area
    Candidates for the Thames Valley Police Force Area On 6th May, you will be able to vote for your police and crime commissioner. Find out who your local candidates are and how to vote Contents About Police and Crime Commissioners 02 Matthew Barber The Conservative Party Candidate 04 Laetisia Carter Labour and Co-operative Party 06 John Howson Liberal Democrats 08 Alan Robinson Independent 10 Statement by the Police Area Returning Officer for Thames Valley 12 About Police and Crime Commissioners On 6th May, you will be able to vote for your Police and Crime Commissioner (PCC). The role of the PCC is to be the voice of the people and hold the police to account. Elections will be taking place in England and Wales. In London, Greater Manchester and West Yorkshire, there will be elections at the same time for Mayors who exercise PCC functions. PCCs are responsible for the totality of policing in their force area and aim to cut crime and deliver an effective and efficient police service. 39 PCCs will be elected across England and Wales, of which 4 are also responsible for overseeing the fire and rescue authority for their area and are called Police, Fire and Crime Commissioners (PFCC) – these PFCCs are found in Essex, Staffordshire, North Yorkshire and Northamptonshire). There will also be 3 Mayors with PCC functions elected in London, Greater Manchester and West Yorkshire. PCCs are elected by you and aim to cut crime and hold the force to account on behalf of the public. PCCs bring a public voice to policing, and they do this by: • engaging with the public and victims of crime to help set the policing priorities for the area and consulting on their Police and Crime plans; • ensuring the police force budget is spent where it matters most; and • appointing the Chief Constable, holding them to account for delivery of their objectives and if necessary, dismissing them.
    [Show full text]
  • London Borough of Hounslow the Civic Centre Lampton Road Hounslow TW3 4DN
    London Borough of Hounslow The Civic Centre Lampton Road Hounslow TW3 4DN Committee Services If you require further information about this agenda please contact: Carol Stiles Tel. 020 8583 2066 or email [email protected]. CHISWICK AREA COMMITTEE (MONITORING) A meeting of the Chiswick Area Committee (Monitoring) will be held in The Hogarth Hall, Chiswick Town Hall, Heathfield Terrace, Chiswick W4 on Wednesday, 10 December 2003 at 7:30 pm MEMBERSHIP Councillor Lynch- Chair Councillors Barwood, Gilson, Day, Thompson, Lee, Kinghorn, Davies and Oulds. Co-optees - David Beattie and David Hopkins AGENDA PART I - ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION WHILE THE PRESS AND PUBLIC ARE IN ATTENDANCE 1. Apologies for absence, declarations of interest or any other communications from Members 2. Minutes of the meeting held on 12 November 2003 (Pages 1 - 17) Public Forum The Open Forum will take place as close as possible to 9.00 p.m. for approximately 20 minutes. Members of the public may raise matters of local concern. Please bear in mind the guidelines for public participation and that it may not be possible to have a detailed discussion or response at the meeting. Points raised will be noted and used to inform the work of the Area Committee. Protocol for the Open Forum ♦ Written items to be submitted where possible. (Proformas will be available at the back of the hall). ♦ Where they are so submitted this should be by 8.30 p.m. ♦ Speakers will be allowed at the Chair’s discretion. ♦ The Chair will normally only allow one contribution per person per item and one item per person per meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 No 3 September.Pdf
    WEST MIDDLESEX FAMILY HISTORY SOCIETY Executive Committee Chairman Mrs Yvonne Masson [email protected] Vice Chairman Jim Devine Secretary Tony Simpson 32 The Avenue, Bedford Park, Chiswick W4 1HT [email protected] Treasurer Paul Kershaw 241 Waldegrave Road, Twickenham TW1 4SY [email protected] Membership Secretary Mrs June Watkins 22 Chalmers Road, Ashford, Middlesex TW15 1DT [email protected] Editor Mrs Pam Smith 23 Worple Road, Ashford, Middlesex TW15 1DT [email protected] Committee Members Mike Cordery Kay Dudman Chris Hern Brian Page Maggie Mold Programme Secretary Mrs. Maggie Mold 48 Darby Crescent, Sunbury-on-Thames Middlesex TW16 5LA Society Web site http://www.west-middlesex-fhs.org.uk/ Subscriptions All Categories: £10.00 per annum Subscription year l January to 31 December Examiners Lee Goodchild and Muriel Sprott In all correspondence please mark your envelope WMFHS in the upper left-hand corner; if a reply is needed, a SAE/IRCs must be enclosed. Members are asked to note that receipts are only sent by request, if return postage is included. Published by West Middlesex Family History Society Registered Charity No. 291906 WEST MIDDLESEX FAMILY HISTORY SOCIETY JOURNAL Volume 24 Number 3 September 2006 Contents Future meetings …………………………………………….. 2 News Roundup ……………………………………………... 3 WMFHS Noticeboard ……………………………………… 4 West Middlesex FHS Tape Library from 1992 ……………. 9 A Remarkable Addendum to the Story of the Unconventional Great Aunt ………………………………... 11 A Very Victorian Affair ……………………………………. 12 Was Your Ancestor a Police Officer? ……………………… 21 Visit to Brookwood Cemetery in July 2006 ………………... 22 Alice German RN, USA …………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Castle Street, Reading Rg1 7Sn
    HOME | THE BUILDING | LOCATION | COMMUNICATIONS | CONTACT CASTLE STREET, READING RG1 7SN HIGH QUALITY OFFICES WITH AN EXCEPTIONAL TOWN CENTRE PARKING RATIO OF 1:426 SQ FT HOME | THE BUILDING | LOCATION | COMMUNICATIONS | CONTACT Advantage House is a striking landmark building located in Reading’s town centre. The building has been carefully designed to offer contemporary high quality, open-plan office space with exceptional parking. SPECIFICATION • On-site receptionist • Impressive reception and business lounge • Two passenger lifts • Four pipe fan-coil air conditioning • Raised access flooring • LG7 lighting • Excellent car parking ratio of 1:426 sq ft • Male, female and disabled WC facilities • Shower facilities • EPC rating ‘B’ • ‘Excellent’ BREEAM rating HOME | THE BUILDING | LOCATION | COMMUNICATIONS | CONTACT AVAILABILITY Floor sq ft sq m Fourth LET Advantage House occupiers include: Part Third 3,200 297 Part Third LET Second LET Part First 2,768 257 Part First LET Ground LET Total 5,968 554 Available space Indicative space plan 32 x workstations Reception area Kitchenette Break-out area 2 x 8-person meeting rooms Storage Printing area 2,768 sq ft Let to Let to IT Talent IT Talent HOME | THE BUILDING | LOCATION | COMMUNICATIONS | CONTACT READING Reading is widely known as the ‘capital of facilities, including The Oracle shopping the Thames Valley’ and is one of the most centre, John Lewis, cafés and bars, and important commercial centres outside of entertainment venues, such as the Hexagon London. The town is home to many major Theatre and Vue cinema. corporate occupiers, including Microsoft, J11 of the M4 motorway is just 3.3 miles SSE, Huawei and Prudential.
    [Show full text]
  • South Colne Sub-Area 3
    SOUTH COLNE DETAILED STRATEGIES SUB-AREA 3 South Colne character South Colne is characterised by flatter topography as the River Colne approaches its confluence with the Thames. Braided watercourses and flood meadows typify the landscape, which is dominated in aerial views by a series of large reservoirs, the product of historic gravel extraction industry in the area. The South West London Reservoirs are internationally significant for the populations of overwintering birds they support, some from as far afield as the Arctic. This area also includes Heathrow airport and the extensive associated transport infrastructure. In close proximity to the airport lie some significant heritage assets including Harmondsworth Barn, the largest timber- framed building in England. © Brian Robert Marshall CC Andreas Trepte, www.photo-natur.net Harmondsworth Barn River Colne flowing through Staines Moor Lakes and reservoirs important for SOUTH COLNE overwintering wildfowl DETAILED SUB-AREA 3 STRATEGIES © Stefan Czapski The Causeway at Staines Reservoir Ankerwycke Priory - home to the Ankerwycke Colne Brook at Wraysbury - important for Yew wildlife Colne & Crane valleys green infrastructure strategy 51 South Colne area strategy overview The strategy for South Colne and Heathrow associated opportunities for education and is to improve and repair the landscape and interpretation and new viewpoints. connectivity for people and wildlife, conserve INTERWOVEN RIVERS and enhance valuable ecological habitats and Water and biodiversity enhancements should aim promote access for all to new and improved to restore floodplains and focus on the benefits of RECREATION landscape destinations. natural landscapes to contribute to natural flood LOCAL + GLOBAL management in this low lying landscape. The Roads and other major infrastructure in this area Duke of Northumberland’s River and Longford WATER SPORTS create particular severance and impair the River close to Heathrow could be enhanced TRANSFORM quality of the user experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Sleepio in the Thames Valley
    Sleepio in the Thames Valley Scaling digital Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) for insomnia with the NHS 04 Sleepio & the Oxford AHSN FOREWORD FROM THE OXFORD ACADEMIC HEALTH Contents SCIENCE NETWORK (AHSN) 06 Executive Summary In October 2018, the Oxford AHSN and Big Health came 08 Challenge together to assess whether Sleepio - a digital CBT programme for insomnia - could bridge the treatment gap for insomnia in 14 Opportunity primary care. Fast forward to today, and over 7,000 people have accessed evidence-based CBT for insomnia and poor sleep. 22 Engagement & Outcomes This report represents a rich set of learnings for innovators 26 Cost Savings and NHS systems on how a fully automated digital solution can be successfully implemented at scale. We believe this project 28 Feedback represents innovation at its best, benefiting patients, clinicians, and commissioners alike. The NHS has shown that where there 38 References is the willingness and capacity to innovate, truly extraordinary feats can be achieved; all the more important in these challenging times. As we approach the completion of this project, we believe it is time for tried and tested innovations like Sleepio to be routinely adopted in the NHS, and embedded in commissioning and service delivery across the country. In this way, the very purpose of the AHSN Network - “transforming lives through healthcare innovation” - can result in millions of people getting access to solutions that really work, while at the same time offering cost savings to the NHS. We would like to thank all the stakeholders who have come together to make this project such a success and in particular, we are grateful to Innovate UK for their funding and ongoing support.
    [Show full text]
  • Heathrow Airport Expansion – Consultation Document
    Page 1 HEATHROW AIRPORT EXPANSION – CONSULTATION DOCUMENT JUNE 2019 Page 2 Page 3 Table of contents page page page 1. Foreword 5 4. Construction 39 7. Managing the effects of expansion 71 4.1. Indicative construction programme 40 7.1. Air quality and odour 72 2. Introduction 6 Anticipated early works 40 7.2. Community 73 2.1. Heathrow today 6 DCO approval to runway opening 7.3. Health 74 (2021 to around 2026) 41 2.2. The background to Heathrow expansion 8 7.4. Noise 75 From runway opening (around 2026) 2.3. Our previous consultations 9 to approximately 115 mppa (around 2030) 42 7.5. Socio-economic and employment 80 2.4. This consultation 10 From approximately 115 mppa (around 2030) 7.6. Transport network users 81 to approximately 130 mppa (around 2035) 43 2.5. What happens next? 12 7.7. Biodiversity 82 From approximately 130 mppa (around 2035) to 7.8. Historic environment 83 approximately 142 mppa (around 2050) 44 3. Our Preferred Masterplan 14 7.9. Land quality 84 4.2. Construction and logistics management 45 3.1. Airfield 16 7.10. Landscape and visual impact 85 4.3. Managing the effects of construction 47 3.2. Terminals, satellites and aprons 18 7.11. Water environment 86 3.3. Roads and rail 20 5. Future operations 49 7.12. Carbon 88 3.4. Active travel 23 5.1. Runway alternation 51 7.13. Climate change 89 3.5. Water environment 24 5.2. Ban on scheduled night flights 56 7.14. Waste 90 3.6.
    [Show full text]
  • Pfmv9 Assumptions Report
    PFMv9 Assumptions Report May 2020 © HS2 Ltd www.hs2.org.uk High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has been tasked by the Department for Transport (DfT) with managing the delivery of a new national high speed rail network. It is a non-departmental public body wholly owned by the DfT. High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, Two Snowhill Snow Hill Queensway Birmingham B4 6GA Telephone: 08081 434 434 General email enquiries: [email protected] Website: www.hs2.org.uk High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has actively considered the needs of blind and partially sighted people in accessing this document. The text will be made available in full on the HS2 website. The text may be freely downloaded and translated by individuals or organisations for conversion into other accessible formats. If you have other needs in this regard please contact High Speed Two (HS2) Limited. © High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, 2020, except where otherwise stated. Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with High Speed Two (HS2) Limited. This information is licensed under the Open Government Licence v2.0. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ version/2 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or e-mail: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third-party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Printed in Great Britain on paper containing at least 75% recycled fibre PFMv9 Assumptions Report Revision: Rev01 Contents 1 Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Orthoptera Recording Scheme for Britain and Ireland
    ORTHOPTERA RECORDING SCHEME FOR BRITAIN AND IRELAND Newsletter 25 - February 1999 Editor: John Widgery 2I FieldYiew Road Potters Bar Herts EN6 2NA Tel: 01707 642708 INTRODUCTION It seems incredible that another year has passed since the last newsletter (NL24). This current newsletter is inænded to update all readers of the most significant developments since then. Of course, those of you who take British Wildlife magazine may already be awarg tlrough my 'rWildlife Notes', of some of the information contained herein. The success ofthe scheme relies upon your endeavours and, once again, I am indebted to the many of you who have submitted records and also to Paul Pearce-Kelly, Rachel Jones and Bryan Pinchen for their contributions on rare species. SUMMARY OF HIGHLIGHTS In comparison with recent years, the summer of 1998 was disappointing, although parts of southern England did have some reÍlsonably warm and dry weather during August and early September which is probably the most important period for the breeding success of many species. It was, perhaps, not surprising that there were fewer records submitted during 1998 as compared with the previous yàr but, even so, there were still several thousand which involved a total of 349 new l0hn squares (including 68 post-1970 refinds). Of these, 195 (including 23 post-1970s) were for 1998, including first ever records for Roesel's Bush Cricket, Metrioptera roeselii, in the Channel Islands, Long-winged Conehead, Conocephalus discolor, in Cambridgeshire and Lesnets Earwig, Forfcula lesnei,in Worcestershire and also a national first for this latter species in lreland. Additionally, we had the most northerly yet records for Lesser Marsh Grasshopper, Chorthippus albomarginqtus.
    [Show full text]