J. A. Hartsock & E. S. Beckman . Conatus 4, no. 2 (2019): 317-339 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/cjp.21076 A Human Paradox: The Nazi Legacy of Pernkopf’s Atlas Jane A. Hartsock1 and Emily S. Beckman2 1Indiana University Health, USA E-mail address:
[email protected] ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2359-7706 2Indiana University - Purdue University, USA E-mail address:
[email protected] ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4966-0950 Abstract Eduard Pernkopf’s Atlas of Topographical and Applied Human Anatomy is a four-volume anatomical atlas published between 1937 and 1963, and it is generally believed to be the most comprehensive, detailed, and accurate anatomy textbook ever created. However, a 1997 investigation into “Pernkopf’s Atlas,” raised troubling questions regarding the author’s connection to the Nazi regime and the still unresolved issue of whether its illustrations relied on Jewish or other political prisoners, including those executed in Nazi concentration camps. Following this investigation, the book was removed from both anatomy classrooms and library bookshelves. A debate has ensued over the book’s continued use, and justification for its use has focused on two issues: (1) there is no definitive proof the book includes illustrations of concentration camp prisoners or Jewish individuals in particular, and (2) there is no contemporary equivalent to this text. However, both points fail to address the central importance of the book, not simply as part of anatomy instruction, but also as a comprehensive historical narrative with important ethical implications. Having encountered a first edition copy, these authors were given a unique opportunity to engage with the text through the respective humanities lenses of history, ethics, and narrative.