DOCSLIB.ORG

Lies, Incorporated

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lies, Incorporated Ari Rabin-Havt and Media Matters for America Lies, Incorporated Ari Rabin-Havt is host of The Agenda, a national radio show airing Monday through Friday on SiriusXM. His writing has been featured in USA Today, The New Republic, The Nation, The New York Observer, Salon, and The American Prospect, and he has appeared on MSNBC, CNBC, Al Jazeera, and HuffPost Live. Along with David Brock, he coauthored The Fox Effect: How Roger Ailes Turned a Network into a Propaganda Machine and The Benghazi Hoax. He previously served as executive vice president of Media Matters for America and as an adviser to Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid and former vice president Al Gore. Media Matters for America is a Web-based, not-for-profit, progressive research and information center dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media. ALSO AVAILABLE FROM ANCHOR BOOKS Free Ride: John McCain and the Media by David Brock and Paul Waldman The Fox Effect: How Roger Ailes Turned a Network into a Propaganda Machine by David Brock, Ari Rabin-Havt, and Media Matters for America AN ANCHOR BOOKS ORIGINAL, APRIL 2016 Copyright © 2016 by Ari Rabin-Havt and Media Matters for America All rights reserved. Published in the United States by Anchor Books, a division of Penguin Random House LLC, New York, and distributed in Canada by Random House of Canada, a division of Penguin Random House Canada Limited, Toronto. Anchor Books and colophon are registered trademarks of Penguin Random House LLC. Reinhart-Rogoff chart on this page created by Jared Bernstein for jaredbernsteinblog.com. Reprinted by permission of Jared Bernstein. The Cataloging-in-Publication Data is on file at the Library of Congress. Anchor Paperback ISBN 9780307279590 eBook ISBN 9781101972274 Cover design by Mark Abrams Cover images: (gun) © Anthonycz/Shutterstock; money, barrel and factory © Iconfinder www.anchorbooks.com v4.1 ep Contents Cover Ari Rabin-Havt and Media Matters for America Also Available from Anchor Books Title Page Copyright Epigraph Preface: Liar Introduction: Lies, Incorporated Chapter 1: The Birth of Lies, Incorporated: Tobacco Chapter 2: Tobacco’s Sequel: Climate Change Chapter 3: Lie Panel: Health Care Chapter 4: Growth in a Time of Lies: Debt Chapter 5: On the Border of Truth: Immigration Reform Chapter 6: Two Dangerous Weapons: Guns and Lies Chapter 7: One Lie, One Vote: Voter I.D. Laws Chapter 8: Shut That Whole Lie Down: Abortion Chapter 9: A Lie’s Last Gasp: Gay Marriage Chapter 10: Defeating Lies, Incorporated Notes Acknowledgments Lie \´lī\ 1: to make an untrue statement with intent to deceive 2: to create a false or misleading impression Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary Politicians lie. This behavior is not the monopoly of any political party or ideology. They lie about their personal lives, their aberrant behavior, and their records. This book is not about those lies. The types of lies this book is concerned with are the ones many politicians fully believe to be true—ones that have been passed to them by a staffer, a constituent, or a lobbyist. Those lies, sometimes repeated without intent, are designed to distort the policy-making process. Dig deep enough and you find an industry dedicated to the creation of lies and a group of people who profit from them. They are Lies, Incorporated. Preface: Liar Richard Berman is a liar. He is a man who manipulates the truth on behalf of corporate clients and earns his living profiting from the invention and trafficking of lies. The fast-food industry, tobacco companies, and high-fructose corn syrup producers have all called upon him to do what few others would: shamelessly spread falsehoods, smear the reputations of well-regarded nonprofit groups, and purchase phony research. For decades, when industries decided their last resort was the nastiest of PR campaigns, they have summoned him. Berman, who relishes the title of “Dr. Evil,”1 is not just an operator for sale to the highest bidder. He is the purest representation of a growing force in American politics that creates and disseminates lies designed to disrupt the public policy process for monetary and ideological gain. With a shield of anonymity provided by the tax code, Berman’s donors use him to engage in a form of asymmetric public policy warfare.2 For example, when agricultural interests sought to retaliate against the Humane Society for their advocacy work against factory farms, Berman launched a series of attacks against the organization. The companies funding this effort would never want their names associated with such a campaign. Attacking a popular organization like the Humane Society would damage their brands. Instead, Berman created a tax-exempt organization, HumaneWatch.org, to which they could anonymously donate and from which he would be paid a fee to manage. In addition to running its website, which promotes daily smears of the Humane Society and spreads false information about their work, Berman has produced ads targeting the group. One particularly misleading commercial aired during the 2013 Academy Awards compared the Humane Society to the notorious Ponzi scheme operated by Bernie Madoff. The ad charged “HSUS gives less than one percent of its massive donations to local pet shelters but has socked away $17 million in its own pension fund.”3 This attack was misleading at best. Every year the organization cares for hundreds of thousands of animals through a variety of its programs4; in 2014, programmatic expenses made up 80 percent of the year’s overall revenue and support.5 Berman is something of a caricature of the unprincipled lobbyist, the apotheosis of all that is wrong with Washington. It’s a notoriety he enjoys. Whether appearing as a guest on The Colbert Report or defending his exploits on The Rachel Maddow Show, Berman oddly seems to relish being berated for making outrageous claims on behalf of his undisclosed clients,6 7 such as pregnant women should not worry about mercury levels in fish. When Richard Berman appeared with Fox Business’s host Stuart Varney in July 2013 to discuss low-wage worker strikes taking place in cities across the country and their potential for negatively impacting workers, he was identified as being from the innocuous-sounding EPI—Employment Policies Institute. “At fifteen dollars an hour, many, I won’t say a majority, but many fast-food restaurants are out of business,” he told Varney.8 EPI’s funding from the fast- food industry or its connections to Berman’s consulting business was never disclosed. The New York Times called Berman’s work on behalf of the fast-food industry “a critical element in the lobbying campaign against the increase in the minimum wage,” noting that industry insiders “often cite the [EPI’s] reports, creating the Washington echo chamber effect that is so coveted by industry lobbyists.”9 This is a form of media manipulation mastered by Berman: a 2013 IRS filing from the Employment Policies Institute reports the organization’s “media outreach” resulted in “over 830” stories on radio, TV, in print, and online in that year alone.10 The brilliance of Berman’s strategy of creating front organizations is that reporters are often duped into quoting him (or his staff) not as an industry- funded lobbyist, but as the conservative, yet financially disinterested, head of a nonprofit. When The Wall Street Journal covered an EPI-funded study on the impact of increasing the minimum wage, it referred to the organization as a “right-leaning” think tank and quoted the study’s author as saying, “There’s never a good time to raise the minimum wage.”11 Yet the paper did not disclose that the Employment Policies Institute receives its funding from the fast-food industry, nor did it justify the vast overstatement of calling the group a “think tank.” For one, the Employment Policies Institute has zero full-time employees. On its 2013 IRS Form 990, the group reported that $1.044 million of its $2.131 million budget was paid directly to Richard Berman’s firm for management, advertising, research, and accounting. Meanwhile, the organization’s lack of staff was evidenced by the fact that their total payroll for the year was $46,417, all of which save $3,500 was listed as a fund-raising expense. Furthermore, $20,175 of this total was paid to Richard Berman personally.12 Meanwhile, EPI’s staff list on the same form includes just eight positions: six people each holding the title of “Director,” all paid $500 for less than fifteen minutes of work per week; one “Secretary/Treasurer,” who was paid $500 for less than twenty minutes of work per week; and Richard Berman, the “President / Executive Director,” who, as previously mentioned, was paid $20,175 for less than nine hours of work per week. Of the total $46,417 in payroll expenses, just $3,500 was spent on management and general expenses (the amount paid to the Directors and Secretary/Treasurer).13 The Employment Policies Institute exists as nothing more than a vessel to funnel money to Berman’s firm, revealing his greatest achievement: the way he so effectively blurs the lines between political operatives, corporate lobbyists, and the think tank world, sowing confusion on behalf of his clients. Richard Berman keeps his clients and their goals well hidden.14 He has front groups layered upon front groups layered upon front groups—many, if not all, sharing the same office space. Berman heads up the larger organizations, which then develop smaller projects, which then create more small projects. The only way to truly get to the bottom of who leads and funds these organizations is to sift through hundreds of pages of IRS filings, and even then the information is murky at best.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 4 the Right-Wing Media Enablers of Anti-Islam Propaganda
    Chapter 4 The right-wing media enablers of anti-Islam propaganda Spreading anti-Muslim hate in America depends on a well-developed right-wing media echo chamber to amplify a few marginal voices. The think tank misinforma- tion experts and grassroots and religious-right organizations profiled in this report boast a symbiotic relationship with a loosely aligned, ideologically-akin group of right-wing blogs, magazines, radio stations, newspapers, and television news shows to spread their anti-Islam messages and myths. The media outlets, in turn, give members of this network the exposure needed to amplify their message, reach larger audiences, drive fundraising numbers, and grow their membership base. Some well-established conservative media outlets are a key part of this echo cham- ber, mixing coverage of alarmist threats posed by the mere existence of Muslims in America with other news stories. Chief among the media partners are the Fox News empire,1 the influential conservative magazine National Review and its website,2 a host of right-wing radio hosts, The Washington Times newspaper and website,3 and the Christian Broadcasting Network and website.4 They tout Frank Gaffney, David Yerushalmi, Daniel Pipes, Robert Spencer, Steven Emerson, and others as experts, and invite supposedly moderate Muslim and Arabs to endorse bigoted views. In so doing, these media organizations amplify harm- ful, anti-Muslim views to wide audiences. (See box on page 86) In this chapter we profile some of the right-wing media enablers, beginning with the websites, then hate radio, then the television outlets. The websites A network of right-wing websites and blogs are frequently the primary movers of anti-Muslim messages and myths.
    [Show full text]
  • Betsy Mccaughey, Ph.D. Phone: (212) 534-3047 • E-Mail: [email protected]
    Betsy McCaughey, Ph.D. Phone: (212) 534-3047 • E-Mail: [email protected] Dr. McCaughey is a health policy expert and former Lt. Governor of New York State. In 2004, she founded the Committee to Reduce Infection Deaths (www.hospitalinfection.org), a nationwide educational campaign to stop hospital-acquired infections. She serves as the Chairman of the organization. In five years, RID has made hospital infections a major public issue, provided compelling evidence that preventing infection improves hospital profitability as well as saving lives, and won legislation in over 25 states for public reporting of infection rates. RID has become synonymous with patient safety and clean hospital care. Dr. McCaughey’s research on how to prevent infection deaths has been featured on Good Morning America, the CBS Morning Show, ABC’s 20/20, and many other national programs. She has appeared on Fox News Network’s Hannity & Colmes, The O’Reilly Factor, CNN’s Talk Back Live, and numerous radio programs. Dr. McCaughey is the author of over one hundred scholarly and popular articles on health policy, infection, medical innovation, the economics of aging, and Medicare. Her writings have appeared in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, New Republic, Policy Review, Forbes Magazine, New York Law Journal, Los Angeles Times, U.S. News & World Report, and many other national publications. Her 1994 analysis of the dangers of the Clinton health plan in the New Republic won a National Magazine Award for the best article in the nation on public policy. Her article on the dangers of “Dumbing Down Medical Care” won the National Media Award from the American Society of Anesthesiologists.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pulitzer Prizes 2020 Winne
    WINNERS AND FINALISTS 1917 TO PRESENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Excerpts from the Plan of Award ..............................................................2 PULITZER PRIZES IN JOURNALISM Public Service ...........................................................................................6 Reporting ...............................................................................................24 Local Reporting .....................................................................................27 Local Reporting, Edition Time ..............................................................32 Local General or Spot News Reporting ..................................................33 General News Reporting ........................................................................36 Spot News Reporting ............................................................................38 Breaking News Reporting .....................................................................39 Local Reporting, No Edition Time .......................................................45 Local Investigative or Specialized Reporting .........................................47 Investigative Reporting ..........................................................................50 Explanatory Journalism .........................................................................61 Explanatory Reporting ...........................................................................64 Specialized Reporting .............................................................................70
    [Show full text]
  • White Male Heterosexist Norms in the Confirmation Process Theresa M
    University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law Bowen Law Repository: Scholarship & Archives Faculty Scholarship 2011 White Male Heterosexist Norms in the Confirmation Process Theresa M. Beiner University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://lawrepository.ualr.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Judges Commons, Law and Gender Commons, and the Law and Race Commons Recommended Citation Theresa M. Beiner, White Male Heterosexist Norms in the Confirmation Process, 32 Women's Rts. L. Rep. 105 (2011). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Bowen Law Repository: Scholarship & Archives. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Bowen Law Repository: Scholarship & Archives. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WHITE MALE HETEROSEXIST NORMS IN THE CONFIRMATION PROCESS Theresa M Beiner* I. INTRODUCTION Justice Sonia Sotomayor's confirmation hearing took a controversial turn when commentators became aware of a reference in the New York Times to a portion of a speech she gave in 2001.1 In that speech, she candidly addressed how her background might influence her decision making opining, "I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life." 2 Eight years later a minor . Nadine Baum Distinguished Professor of Law, Associate Dean for Faculty Development, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, William H. Bowen School of Law.
    [Show full text]
  • George H.W. Bush, "Speech at Penn State University" (23 September 1992)
    Voices of Democracy 2 (2007): 126‐151 Hogan & Mehltretter 126 GEORGE H.W. BUSH, "SPEECH AT PENN STATE UNIVERSITY" (23 SEPTEMBER 1992) J. Michael Hogan and Sara Ann Mehltretter Pennsylvania State University Abstract: During the 1992 presidential campaign, President George H. W. Bush lost a lead in the polls and subsequently the presidency to Bill Clinton. This study helps to account for that loss by illuminating weaknesses in his campaign stump speech. Bush's speech at Penn State University reflected his difficulties in distinguishing himself from his challenger and articulating a vision for his second term. The essay also illustrates larger controversies over politics and free speech on campus. Key Words: 1992 presidential election, George H. W. Bush, Bill Clinton, campaign speeches, free speech on campus, Penn State University On September 23, 1992, President George H.W. Bush brought his reelection campaign to the University Park campus of the Pennsylvania State University. Speaking on the steps of Old Main to a cheering crowd of supporters, Bush said little new in the speech. Yet it still proved controversial, not so much because of what Bush said, but because of the way the event was staged. Sparking controversy over the distribution of tickets and the treatment of protestors at the event, Bush's appearance dramatized the difficulties of staging campaign events at colleges and universities. It also raised larger issues about politics and free speech on campus. Bush's speech at Penn State was carefully prepared and vetted by his speech‐ writing staff and White House advisers. Yet despite all the effort that went into the speech, it was vague, uninspired, and unresponsive to criticisms of his administration, reflecting the larger problems with Bush's faltering campaign.
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Liberty for a Select Few the Justice Department Is Promoting Discrimination Across the Federal Government
    GETTY MAY IMAGES/CHERISS Religious Liberty for a Select Few The Justice Department Is Promoting Discrimination Across the Federal Government By Sharita Gruberg, Frank J. Bewkes, Elizabeth Platt, Katherine Franke, and Claire Markham April 2018 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG Religious Liberty for a Select Few The Justice Department Is Promoting Discrimination Across the Federal Government By Sharita Gruberg, Frank J. Bewkes, Elizabeth Platt, Katherine Franke, and Claire Markham April 2018 Contents 1 Introduction and summary 4 Jeff Sessions’ religious liberty guidance is a solution in search of a problem 5 The guidance misinterprets constitutional and statutory religious liberty protections 9 The guidance’s impact will be far-reaching and expensive 18 Conclusion 20 About the authors 22 Endnotes Introduction and summary In its first year, the Trump administration has systematically redefined and expanded the right to religious exemptions, creating broad carve-outs to a host of vital health, labor, and antidiscrimination protections. On May 4, 2017—the National Day of Prayer—during a ceremony outside the White House, President Donald Trump signed an executive order on “Promoting Free Speech and Religious Liberty.” At the time, the executive order was reported to be a “major triumph” for Vice President Mike Pence, who, as governor of Indiana, famously signed a religious exemption law that would have opened the door to anti-LGBTQ discrimination.1 Among its other directives, the order instructed Attorney General Jeff Sessions to “issue guidance interpreting
    [Show full text]
  • Tampa Bay Times Pulitzer Prize Winning Advocacy of Fluoridation
    Tampa Bay Times Pulitzer Prize Winning Advocacy of Fluoridation Page Date Byline 2 03/17/2012 Reverse the decay of common sense 5 04/19/2012 Another City Steps Up for Dental Health 6 08/04/2012 Paying for Fluoride Four's foolishness 8 08/21/2012 Scott picks ideology over residents' health 10 09/20/2012 Brickfield strays from fluoride facts to defend his vote 12 10/12/2012 Bring Pinellas Commission Back to Mainstream 15 10/31/2012 The real cost of the fluoride fiasco 17 11/07/2012 Facts over fear in Pinellas commission races 18 11/27/2012 Welcome reversal on fluoride 20 02/28/2013 Scientific sense and fluoride 22 03/14/2013 Times' Tim Nickens wins Walker Stone Award for editorials 23 04/15/2013 Pulitzer, finalists are source of pride for Poynter 26 04/15/2013 Pulitzers Awarded to Times, Journal 29 04/15/2013 Tampa Bay Times wins Pulitzer, reacts to announcement 31 04/15/2013 Times' Tim Nickens, Daniel Ruth win Pulitzer Prize for editorial writing 34 04/15/2013 Times' winning Pulitzer Prize entry for Editorial Writing Reverse the decay of common sense | Tampa Bay Times 5/18/13 1:35 PM A Times Editorial Reverse the decay of common sense Saturday, March 17, 2012 4:30am This is a defining moment for Pinellas County, where Midwestern sensibilities run deep and extremism usually fails. It's been nearly three months since the county stopped putting fluoride in its drinking water. The reason: Four county commissioners sided with a handful of tea party followers, conspiracy theorists and a tiny antifluoride group misnamed Citizens for Safe Water.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Talk Radio and Its Impact on Politics and Public Policy
    Mount Rushmore: The Rise of Talk Radio and Its Impact on Politics and Public Policy Brian Asher Rosenwald Wynnewood, PA Master of Arts, University of Virginia, 2009 Bachelor of Arts, University of Pennsylvania, 2006 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History University of Virginia August, 2015 !1 © Copyright 2015 by Brian Asher Rosenwald All Rights Reserved August 2015 !2 Acknowledgements I am deeply indebted to the many people without whom this project would not have been possible. First, a huge thank you to the more than two hundred and twenty five people from the radio and political worlds who graciously took time from their busy schedules to answer my questions. Some of them put up with repeated follow ups and nagging emails as I tried to develop an understanding of the business and its political implications. They allowed me to keep most things on the record, and provided me with an understanding that simply would not have been possible without their participation. When I began this project, I never imagined that I would interview anywhere near this many people, but now, almost five years later, I cannot imagine the project without the information gleaned from these invaluable interviews. I have been fortunate enough to receive fellowships from the Fox Leadership Program at the University of Pennsylvania and the Corcoran Department of History at the University of Virginia, which made it far easier to complete this dissertation. I am grateful to be a part of the Fox family, both because of the great work that the program does, but also because of the terrific people who work at Fox.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking Judicial Minimalism: Abortion Politics, Party Polarization, and the Consequences of Returning the Constitution to Elected Government Neal Devins
    Vanderbilt Law Review Volume 69 | Issue 4 Article 3 5-2016 Rethinking Judicial Minimalism: Abortion Politics, Party Polarization, and the Consequences of Returning the Constitution to Elected Government Neal Devins Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr Part of the Supreme Court of the United States Commons Recommended Citation Neal Devins, Rethinking Judicial Minimalism: Abortion Politics, Party Polarization, and the Consequences of Returning the Constitution to Elected Government, 69 Vanderbilt Law Review 935 (2019) Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol69/iss4/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vanderbilt Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Rethinking Judicial Minimalism: Abortion Politics, Party Polarization, and the Consequences of Returning the Constitution to Elected Government Neal Devins* IN TROD U CTION ............................................................................... 935 I. MINIMALISM THEORY AND ABORTION ................................. 939 II. WHAT ABORTION POLITICS TELLS US ABOUT JUDICIAL M INIMALISM ........................................................ 946 A . R oe v. W ade ............................................................. 947 B . From Roe to Casey ................................................... 953 C. Casey and Beyond ..................................................
    [Show full text]
  • May/June Page 02
    Volume 27, No. 4 May/June 2002 IN THIS ISSUE 74 have registered for Joplin conference ....................................................Page 1, Page 3 President’s Report .................................................................................................Page 2 ISWNE new members ............................................................................................Page 3 ISWNEWS ..........................................................................................................Page 4-5 From the archives (photo) ......................................................................................Page 6 Papers need to speak out in strong tones ................................................................Page 7 High-tech ‘image’ may not equal ‘results’ ...............................................................Page 8 Oklahoma editor enjoys the variety of her life.........................................................Page 9 Illinois editor enjoys informing the public .............................................................Page 10 Buffington was swept up into the newspaper business...........................................Page 11 Joplin Conference Registration.............................................................................Page 12 Joplin Conference Schedule ...........................................................................Page 13-14 ISWNE Scholarship Foundation.............................................................................Page 15 Linnell offers oped service to weeklies
    [Show full text]
  • Pizzagate / Pedogate, a No-Nonsense Fact-Filled Reader
    Pizzagate / Pedogate A No-nonsense Fact-filled reader Preface I therefore determine that serious human rights abuse and corruption around the world constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States, and I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with that threat. —Trump Executive Order 13818, Dec. 20, 2017 Pizzagate means many things to many people, the angle of the lens may be different, but the focus zeros in on a common body of incontestable facts. The fruit of top researchers collected in this reader allows you to compare, correlate and derive a flexible synthesis to suit your needs. An era of wild contradiction is upon us in the press. The psychopathic rumblings that pass for political discourse bring the artform of infotainment to a golden blossoming. A bookstore display table featuring The Fixers; The Bottom-Feeders, Crooked Lawyers, Gossipmongers, and Porn Stars Who Created the 45th President versus Witch Hunt; The Story of the Greatest Mass Delusion in American Political History are both talking about the same man, someone who paid for his campaign out of his own pocket. There were no big donors from China and the traditional bank of puppeteers. This created a HUGE problem, one whose solution threatened the money holders and influence peddlers. New leadership and a presidential order that threw down the gauntlet, a state of emergency, seeded the storm clouds. The starting gun was fired, all systems were go, the race had begun. FISAs and covert operations sprang into action. The envelopes are being delivered, the career decisions are being made, should I move on or stay the course.
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of Fake News in Twitter During the 2016 US Presidential
    Influence of fake news in Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election Alexandre Bovet1;2;3, Hern´anA. Makse1;∗ 1) Levich Institute and Physics Department, City College of New York, New York, New York 10031, USA 2) ICTEAM, Universit´eCatholique de Louvain, Avenue George Lema^ıtre 4, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium 3) naXys and Department of Mathematics, Universit´ede Namur, Rempart de la Vierge 8, 5000 Namur, Belgium. * [email protected] Abstract The dynamics and influence of fake news on Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election remains to be clarified. Here, we use a dataset of 171 million tweets in the five months preceding the election day to identify 30 million tweets, from 2.2 million users, which contain a link to news outlets. Based on a classification of news outlets curated by www.opensources.co, we find that 25% of these tweets spread either fake or extremely biased news. We characterize the networks of these users to find the most influential spreaders of fake and traditional news and use causal modelling to uncover how fake news influenced the presidential election. We find that, while top influencers spreading traditional center and left leaning news largely influence the activity of Clinton supporters, this causality is reversed for the fake news: the activity of Trump supporters influences the dynamics of the top fake news spreaders. 1 Introduction Recent social and political events, such as the 2016 US presidential election [1], have been marked by a growing number of so-called \fake news", i.e. fabricated information that disseminate deceptive content, or grossly distort actual news reports, shared on social media platforms.
    [Show full text]