Übersichtsliste Standorte (*.Pdf, 59,67

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Standortübersicht Blühwiesen Stand Juli 2021 Liegenschaft Adresse Zuständige Umsetzungs- Niederlassung stand Hochschule Zittau/Görlitz * Hochwaldstraße 2, Bautzen umgesetzt Zittau Hochschule Zittau/Görlitz Theodor-Körner-Allee 8, Bautzen umgesetzt Zittau Behördenzentrum Bautzen Käthe-Kollwitz-Straße 17, Bautzen in Planung 02625 Bautzen Behördenzentrum Kamenz Garnisonsplatz 13 - 15, Bautzen in Planung 01917 Kamenz TU Chemnitz Erfenschlager Straße 73, Chemnitz umgesetzt Chemnitz TU Chemnitz Reichenhainer Str. 70, Chemnitz umgesetzt Chemnitz TU Chemnitz Reichenhainer Str. 39/41, Chemnitz umgesetzt Chemnitz Landesschule für Blinde und Flemmingstraße 8, Chemnitz umgesetzt Sehbehinderte Chemnitz Staatliche Betriebsgesellschaft Dresdner Str. 183, Chemnitz umgesetzt für Umwelt und Landwirtschaft/ Chemnitz Universität Leipzig Institut für Rechtsmedizin Finanzamt Chemnitz Süd Paul-Bertz-Str. 1, Chemnitz umgesetzt Chemnitz Landesamt für Umwelt, Wiesenstr. 4, Chemnitz in Planung Landwirtschaft und Geologie, Zwönitz Fortbildungszentrum Zwickau Hochschule Mittweida, Bahnhofstr. 15 / Chemnitz in Planung zwischen Zentrum für Medien Schillerstr. 10, und Soziales und Laserzentrum Mittweida Sächsisches Staatsministerium Wigardstr. 17 / Dresden I in Planung für Wissenschaft, Kultur und Wilhelm-Buck-Str. 4, Tourismus / Sächsisches Dresden Staatsministerium für Energie, Klimaschutz, Umwelt und Landwirtschaft Behördenzentrum Klotzsche * Zur Wetterwarte 1-11, Dresden I umgesetzt Dresden Bildungszentrum Schloßgasse 2-4, Dresden I umgesetzt Reinhardtsgrimma Glashütte Theaterwerkstätten Semperoper Am Zwingerteich 2 a, Dresden I umgesetzt Dresden TU Dresden, Judeich Bau * Pienner Str. 19, Dresden II umgesetzt Tharandt TU Dresden, Lehmann-Zentrum Nöthnitzer Str. 46a, Dresden II umgesetzt Rechenzentrum / Sportstätten * Dresden TU Dresden verschiedene Standorte, Dresden II umgesetzt Dresden HTW Dresden verschiedene Standorte, Dresden II umgesetzt Dresden SIB-Niederlassung Dresden II * Ostra-Allee 23, Dresden II umgesetzt Dresden Gret-Palucca-Schule * Basteiplatz 4, Dresden II umgesetzt Dresden Liegenschaft Adresse Zuständige Umsetzungs- Niederlassung stand Hochschule für Musik Leubnitzer Str. 17 b, Dresden II in Planung Dresden Amtsgericht Borna * Borna Leipzig I umgesetzt Präsidium der Dübener Landstr. 4, Leipzig I umgesetzt Bereitschaftspolizei Leipzig (künftiges) Polizeirevier Leipzig- Essener Str. 4, Leipzig I in Planung Nord Leipzig Universität Leipzig * Jahnallee 59, Leipzig II umgesetzt Leipzig Universität Leipzig, An den Tierkliniken 19, Leipzig II umgesetzt Veterinärmedizin * * Leipzig HTWK Leipzig, Sporthalle * Arno-Nitzsche-Str. 29, Leipzig II umgesetzt Leipzig Berufsakademie Sachsen Schönauer Str. 113a, Leipzig II in Planung Leipzig Staatliche Studienakademie Kopernikusstr. 51, Zwickau umgesetzt Glauchau * Glauchau Staatliche Studienakademie Schachtstr. 128, Zwickau umgesetzt Breitenbrunn * Breitenbrunn Behördenzentrum Plauen Europastr. 1- 25, Zwickau umgesetzt Plauen Polizeifachschule Schneeberg Alte Hohe Str. 4, Zwickau umgesetzt, Schneeberg weitere in Planung Westsächsische Hochschule Scheffelstr. 39, Zwickau umgesetzt, Zwickau * Zwickau weitere in Planung Westsächsische Hochschule Reinsdorfer Str. 16, Zwickau in Planung Zwickau Zwickau Landesamt für Umwelt, Werdauer Str. 70, Zwickau umgesetzt Landwirtschaft und Geologie Zwickau Landesdirektion Sachsen, Lothar-Streit-Str. 24, Zwickau in Planung Abteilung Arbeitsschutz, Zwickau Dienstgebäude Zwickau * Insektenhotel aufgestellt .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Volební Geografie CDU/CSU – Situace Za Vlády Angely Merkelové
MASARYKOVA UNIVERZITA FAKULTA SOCIÁLNÍCH STUDIÍ Katedra politologie Obor Politologie Volební geografie CDU/CSU – situace za vlády Angely Merkelové Bakalářská práce Monika Bělašková Vedoucí práce: Mgr. Michal Pink, Ph.D. UČO: 397600 Obor: Politologie Imatrikulační ročník: 2011 Brno, 29. 4. 2014 1 Prohlášení o autorství práce Prohlašuji, že jsem bakalářskou práci na téma Volební geografie CDU/CSU – situace za vlády Angely Merkelové vypracovala samostatně a použila jen zdroje uvedené v seznamu literatury. V Brně, 29. 4. 2014 Podpis:............................................ 2 Poděkování Ráda bych zde poděkovala za užitečné rady a odborné připomínky vedoucímu práce Mgr. Michalu Pinkovi, Ph.D. 3 Anotace Tato práce se zabývá volebními výsledky Křesťansko-demokratické unie a Křesťansko-sociální unie ve Spolkové republice Německo od nástupu Angely Merkelové do kancléřského úřadu. Cílem je zjištění vývoje volební podpory křesťanských stran v průběhu vlády první ženské kancléřky, tedy od r. 2005 do posledních spolkových voleb r. 2013. Práce vychází ze zjišťování volební podpory strany na úrovni volebních obvodů pomocí volební geografie. Závěrečným výstupem je analýza volební podpory strany a nárůstu volebních zisků v průběhu vlády. Annotation This work deals with the election results of the Christian-Democratic Union and Christian-Social Union in the Federal Republic of Germany since Angela Merkel started in the Chanccellor´s Office. Primary aim is detection of the development of electoral support of Christian parties during the government of the first female Chancellor, so from year 2005 until the last Federal votes in the year 2013. The work is based on detection of the election support of the party at the degree of the electoral district using the electoral geography.
[Show full text]
Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, 1996-2001
ICPSR 2683 Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, 1996-2001 Virginia Sapiro W. Philips Shively Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 4th ICPSR Version February 2004 Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research P.O. Box 1248 Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 www.icpsr.umich.edu Terms of Use Bibliographic Citation: Publications based on ICPSR data collections should acknowledge those sources by means of bibliographic citations. To ensure that such source attributions are captured for social science bibliographic utilities, citations must appear in footnotes or in the reference section of publications. The bibliographic citation for this data collection is: Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Secretariat. COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS, 1996-2001 [Computer file]. 4th ICPSR version. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies [producer], 2002. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2004. Request for Information on To provide funding agencies with essential information about use of Use of ICPSR Resources: archival resources and to facilitate the exchange of information about ICPSR participants' research activities, users of ICPSR data are requested to send to ICPSR bibliographic citations for each completed manuscript or thesis abstract. Visit the ICPSR Web site for more information on submitting citations. Data Disclaimer: The original collector of the data, ICPSR, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for uses of this collection or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses. Responsible Use In preparing data for public release, ICPSR performs a number of Statement: procedures to ensure that the identity of research subjects cannot be disclosed. Any intentional identification or disclosure of a person or establishment violates the assurances of confidentiality given to the providers of the information.
[Show full text]
14-01 Oberbürgermeisterwahlen 2020
14-01 Oberbürgermeisterwahlen 2020 Oberbürgermeisterwahl Oberbürgermeisterneuwahl Wahlkennziffern / Kandidaten / Parteien am 02.02.2020 am 01.03.2020 absolut Prozent absolut Prozent Wahlberechtigte 469 225 x 469 269 x Wahlbeteiligung 230 201 49,1 227 353 48,4 davon: ungültige Stimmen 815 0,4 1 235 0,5 gültige Stimmen 229 386 99,6 226 118 99,5 davon: Burkhard Jung (SPD) 68 288 29,8 110 965 49,1 Franziska Riekewald (DIE LINKE) 31 038 13,5 nicht angetreten Katharina Krefft (GRÜNE) 27 481 12,0 nicht angetreten Sebastian Gemkow (CDU) 72 430 31,6 107 611 47,6 Christoph Neuman (AfD) 19 854 8,6 nicht angetreten Marcus Viefeld (FDP) 2 739 1,2 nicht angetreten Katharina Subat (Die PARTEI) 5 467 2,4 nicht angetreten Ute Elisabeth Gabelmann (PIRATEN) 2 089 0,9 7 542 3,3 Herr Burkhard Jung (SPD) wurde damit erneut zum Oberbürgermeister der Stadt Leipzig gewählt. Quelle: Amt für Statistik und Wahlen Leipzig Im Ergebnis des ersten Wahlganges vom 02.02 2020 erhielt keiner der Bewerber die erforderliche absolute Mehrheit der abgegebenen gültigen Stimmen. So fand gemäß den Vorschriften des Sächsischen Kommunalwahlgesetzes vier Wochen nach dem ersten Wahltermin eine Neuwahl statt. Statistisches Jahrbuch 2020 (Vorabversion) 14-02 Stadtratswahl 2014 und 2019 Wahl am 25.05.2014 / 12.10.2014 Wahl am 26.05.2019 Wahlkennziffern absolut Prozent Sitze absolut Prozent Sitze Wahlberechtigte 441 513 x x 466 442 x x Wahlbeteiligung 179 941 40,8 x 278 667 59,7 x davon: ungültige Stimmzettel 2 902 1,6 x 3 751 1,3 x gültige Stimmzettel 177 039 98,4 x x Gültige Stimmen
[Show full text]
And Long-Term Electoral Returns to Beneficial
Supporting Information: How Lasting is Voter Gratitude? An Analysis of the Short- and Long-term Electoral Returns to Beneficial Policy Michael M. Bechtel { ETH Zurich Jens Hainmueller { Massachusetts Institute of Technology This version: May 2011 Abstract This documents provides additional information referenced in the main paper. Michael M. Bechtel is Postdoctoral Researcher, ETH Zurich, Center for Comparative and International Studies, Haldeneggsteig 4, IFW C45.2, CH-8092 Zurich. E-mail: [email protected]. Jens Hainmueller is Assistant Professor of Political Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Mas- sachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139. E-mail: [email protected]. I. Potential Alternative Explanation for High Electoral Returns in Affected Regions Some have pointed out that the SPD's victory in 2002 may have simply resulted from Gerhard Schröder(SPD) being much more popular than his political opponent Edmund Stoiber and not from the incumbent's massive and swift policy response to the Elbe flooding. For this argument to be valid we should see a differential reaction to the announcement of Stoiber's candidacy in affected and control regions. We use state-level information on the popularity of chancellor Schröderfrom the Forsa survey data to explore the validity of this argument. Figure 2 plots monthly Schröder'sapproval ratings in affected and unaffected states in 2002. Figure 1: Popularity Ratings of Gerhard Schröderand Flood Onset 60 55 50 45 Schroeder Popularity in % 40 35 2002m1 2002m3 2002m5 2002m7 2002m9 2002m2 2002m4 2002m6 2002m8 Treated states (>10% of districts affected) Controls Election Flood Note: Percent of voters that intend to vote for Gerhard Schröderwith .90 confidence envelopes.
[Show full text]
Assessing the 2009 German Federal Elections: How the SPD's Failure To
Assessing the 2009 German Federal Election: How the SPD’s Failure to Coordinate the Left Put the Right in Power Andrew J. Drummond1 University of Arkansas at Little Rock The recent 2009 German Federal Elections provided a decisive electoral victory for the Christian Democrats, who returned to power without the Social Democrats for the first time in more than a decade. But this shift from grand coalition to center-right cabinet is not the only change in the German electoral landscape─in retrospect, the 2009 election may prove to be a historic turning point in the German party system. The election marked the low water marks in the percentage of list votes won by the CDU and the CSU since the founding democratic election of 1949, when the German party system was in its infancy and party attachments not yet mature. The 2009 election also saw the worst performance in terms of list votes for the SPD since the close of WWII, and the highest percentage of list votes registered by the FDP, the Greens, and die Linke (the former Communists) in German history. In this paper I examine district level returns for clues of how the left is fracturing and what a divided left may mean for the future of German electoral politics. I argue this election may in fact signal a significant and perhaps imminent turning point in partisan attachment on the left that will have wide-ranging implications for the SPD’s electoral and coalition building strategies in the future. Introduction The 2009 general election campaign in Germany was by many accounts a timid affair─some even suggested it was “boring” (Cohen, 2009)2 The Christian Democrats (Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands/CDU)─along with their perennial Bavarian partners3, the Christian Socialists (Christlich-Soziale Union in Bayern / CSU)─had been locked in a grand coalition with the Social Democrats (Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands/SPD) since 2005, and there were 1A previous version of this paper was delivered at the annual meetings of the Arkansas Political Science Association, February 26-27, 2010, Jonesboro, AR.
[Show full text]
Cause Or Consequence? the Alternative for Germany and Attitudes Toward Migration Policy
Cause or Consequence? The Alternative for Germany and Attitudes toward Migration Policy Hannah M. Alarian Political Science, University of Florida Abstract: Does a far-right electoral victory change mainstream support for migration policy? Although we know how migration can shape support for the far-right, we know little about the inverse. This article addresses this ques- tion, exploring whether an Alternative for Germany (AfD) candidate’s election changes non-far-right voter attitudes toward migration policies. In combining the German Longitudinal Election Study Short-Term Campaign panel with fed- eral electoral returns, I find the AfD’s 2017 success significantly altered migra- tion attitudes. Specifically, policy support for immigration and asylum declined precipitously where an AfD candidate won the plurality of first votes. Yet these voters were also more likely to support multicultural policies for current immi- grants. Successful AfD candidates therefore appear to enable both an endorse- ment of xenophobic rhetoric and a rejection of cultural assimilation. Keywords: elections, far-right populism, Germany, migration, public opinion Few policies are as connected to the rise of the far right as migration. Even in Germany where nationalistic politics are highly stigmatized, the far-right, Alternative for Germany (AfD) has proven successful in linking itself with nativist migration policies. This change in focus for the AfD from Euroscepti- cism to nationalism came at the height of the 2015 refugee crisis, a message that resonated with traditional mainstream and, perhaps surprisingly, immigrant voters.1 For many of these voters, the 2017 election provided a direct referen- dum on Chancellor Angela Merkel’s stance on refugee resettlement,2 espe- cially within eastern districts where demonstrations against immigrants and asylum seekers continued to erupt.3 Thus, by stoking mass anxiety over migra- tion and leaving its Eurosceptic roots behind, the AfD sought a new strategy to secure its place on the national stage in the 2017 Bundestag election.
[Show full text]
German Teacher Candidates' Perceptions of Their Roles in the Lives of Syrian Refugee Students in Dresden
GERMAN TEACHER CANDIDATES' PERCEPTIONS OF THEIR ROLES IN THE LIVES OF SYRIAN REFUGEE STUDENTS IN DRESDEN Sarah Elina Heineken A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS August 2019 Committee: Bruce Collet, Advisor Christy Galletta-Horner Christina Guenther © 2019 Sarah Heineken All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Bruce Collet, Advisor Beginning in 2011, the Syrian Conflict caused the widespread displacement of over five million people and caused a steep rise in the number of asylum seekers entering the European Union. Chancellor Angela Merkel adopted a controversial open-door policy in the summer 2015 that lifted previous quotas on the number of refugees that could enter Germany (Liebe, Meyerhoff, Kroesen, Chorus, and Glenk, 2018). This policy decision has led to an increase in the presence of Syrian refugee students in Germany public schools, particularly in regions that are less accepting of refugees and foreigners. This study examines the research question: how do German teacher candidates understand their role in the lives of the secondary school-aged Syrian refugees now present in German classrooms? Bourdieu’s (1973) social and cultural capital theory and Bronfenbrenner’s (1977) ecological systems theory provide a framework for my study and allow me to examine the ways in which German teacher candidates assess this phenomenon and identify critical forms of support that Syrian refugee students need. I collected data from eleven individual interviews with teacher candidates from a university in Dresden and coded the data to assess overarching themes that helped to answer the research question.
[Show full text]
Contributions to the Measurement of Public Opinion in Subpopulations
Contributions to the Measurement of Public Opinion in Subpopulations Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Sozialwissenschaen vorgelegt von Simon Munzert an der Sektion Politik – Recht – Wirtscha Fachbereich Politik- und Verwaltungswissenscha Tag der mundlichen¨ Prufung:¨ þÉ. Juli óþÕ¢ Õ. Referent: Prof. Dr. Susumu Shikano, Universitat¨ Konstanz ó. Referent: Prof. Dr. Peter Selb, Universitat¨ Konstanz ì. Referent: Prof. Michael D. Ward, PhD, Duke University Konstanzer Online-Publikations-System (KOPS) URL: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-0-296799 To Stefanie Acknowledgments I would not have been able to write and nish this dissertation without the help and support of many people. First of all, I want to thank my collaborators, Peter Selb and Paul Bauer, for their great work and support. eir contributions to the research presented in this thesis are of no small concern. e single papers received manifold and invaluable feedback over the course of their cre- ation. In particular, Peter Selb and I are grateful to Michael Herrmann, omas Hinz, Winfried Pohlmeier, Susumu Shikano as well as the editors and reviewers of Political Analysis for helpful comments and support. is work was also supported by the Center for Quantitative Methods and Survey Research at the University of Konstanz. e second paper that I wrote together with Paul Bauer also got valuable support. We are grateful to Delia Baldassarri for providing materials of her and Andrew Gelman’s analysis to us. We give the raters of the ALLBUS survey items our most sincere thanks for their contribution. Furthermore, we thank Klaus Armingeon, Matthias Fatke, Markus Freitag, Birte Gundelach, Daniel Stegmuller,¨ Richard Traunmuller¨ and Eva Zeglovits for helpful comments on previ- ous versions of this paper.
[Show full text]
Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 3
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS - MODULE 3 (2006-2011) CODEBOOK: APPENDICES Original CSES file name: cses2_codebook_part3_appendices.txt (Version: Full Release - December 15, 2015) GESIS Data Archive for the Social Sciences Publication (pdf-version, December 2015) ============================================================================================= COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS (CSES) - MODULE 3 (2006-2011) CODEBOOK: APPENDICES APPENDIX I: PARTIES AND LEADERS APPENDIX II: PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS FULL RELEASE - DECEMBER 15, 2015 VERSION CSES Secretariat www.cses.org =========================================================================== HOW TO CITE THE STUDY: The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (www.cses.org). CSES MODULE 3 FULL RELEASE [dataset]. December 15, 2015 version. doi:10.7804/cses.module3.2015-12-15 These materials are based on work supported by the American National Science Foundation (www.nsf.gov) under grant numbers SES-0451598 , SES-0817701, and SES-1154687, the GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, the University of Michigan, in-kind support of participating election studies, the many organizations that sponsor planning meetings and conferences, and the many organizations that fund election studies by CSES collaborators. Any opinions, findings and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in these materials are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding organizations. =========================================================================== IMPORTANT NOTE REGARDING FULL RELEASES: This dataset and all accompanying documentation is the "Full Release" of CSES Module 3 (2006-2011). Users of the Final Release may wish to monitor the errata for CSES Module 3 on the CSES website, to check for known errors which may impact their analyses. To view errata for CSES Module 3, go to the Data Center on the CSES website, navigate to the CSES Module 3 download page, and click on the Errata link in the gray box to the right of the page.
[Show full text]
Sie Haben 2 Stimmen X X
Stimmzettel für die Wahl zum 19. Deutschen Bundestag im Wahlkreis 159 Dresden I am 24. September 2017 Sie haben 2 Stimmen X X hier 1 Stimme hier 1 Stimme für die Wahl für die Wahl einer/eines einer Landesliste (Partei) Wahlkreisabgeordneten - maßgebende Stimme für die Verteilung der Sitze insgesamt auf die einzelnen Parteien - Erststimme Zweitstimme Lämmel, Andreas Christlich Demokratische Union 1 Deutschlands 1 Bundestagsabgeordneter Christlich CDU Dr. Thomas de Maizière, Arnold Vaatz, Demokratische Katharina Landgraf, Yvonne Magwas, Dresden CDU Union Deutschlands Carsten Körber 2 Kipping, Katja DIE LINKE 2 Bundestagsabgeordnete/Literaturwissenschaftlerin DIE Katja Kipping, Dr. André Hahn, DIE LINKE Caren Nicole Lay, Michael Gerhard Leutert, Dresden LINKE DIE LINKE Sabine Zimmermann Avenarius, Christian Sozialdemokratische Partei 3 Deutschlands 3 Oberstaatsanwalt SPD Daniela Kolbe, Thomas Edmund Jurk, Sozialdemokratische Susann Rüthrich, Detlef Müller, Dresden SPD Partei Deutschlands Dr. Simone Raatz 4 Maier, Jens Alternative für Deutschland 4 Richter am Landgericht AfD Dr. Frauke Petry, Jens Maier, Alternative Siegbert Droese, Detlev Spangenberg, Dresden AfD für Deutschland Tino Chrupalla 5 Löser, Thomas BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN 5 Lehrer GRÜNE Monika Lazar, Stephan Kühn, BÜNDNIS 90/ Meike Roden, Wolfgang Wetzel, Dresden GRÜNE DIE GRÜNEN Ines Kummer Grahl, Dietmar Nationaldemokratische Partei 6 Deutschlands 6 Tischler NPD Jens Baur, Arne Wolfgang Schimmer, Nationaldemokratische Ines Schreiber, Jürgen Gansel, Dresden NPD Partei Deutschlands Dr. Johannes Müller 7 Malorny, Robert Freie Demokratische Partei 7 leitender Angestellter Torsten Herbst, FDP Dr. Jürgen Andreas Michael Martens, Freie Demokratische Frank Müller-Rosentritt, Philipp Hartewig, Dresden FDP Partei Christine Schlagehan 8 Smuda, Jörg Stefan Piratenpartei Deutschland 8 Dipl.-Ingenieur Robert Lutz, Toni Rotter, PIRATEN Ute Elisabeth Gabelmann, Piratenpartei Dr.
[Show full text]
Understanding Right-Wing Political Mobilization in Germany
Networks of the ‘Repugnant Other’: Understanding Right-wing Political Mobilization in Germany Bhakti Deodhar Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, India Abstract: Political scientists and sociologists have long been hesitant in applying frameworks from social movements studies to right-wing collective action. Generally developed for left-wing, progressive, egalitarian movements, concepts like rational mobilization, network analysis and micro-mobilizations are considered an awkward fit for analysis of right-wing political and social groups. This paper argues for the importance of such cross-over analysis on two levels. Methodologically, the paper demonstrates crucial importance of ethnographic fieldwork in study of political groups in order to understand the complexity of internal dynamics of right- wing political parties. Insights are drawn from author’s original fieldwork among rank-and-file members of ‘Alternative für Deutschland’ (AfD), a right-wing party in Germany. Substantively, the paper produces a nuanced empirical account of internal dynamics of right- wing mobilization. The paper argues, using insights from the field, that far from being homogenous, irrational and predictive, the actions of right-wing political activists appear to be multi-layered, complex and indeed rational, however onerous to liberal minds. Key Words: right-wing politics, political ethnography, network analysis, right-wing mobilization, German politics Introduction: Traditionally, in political science and sociology, right-wing movements have been primarily conceptualised through the so-called ‘breakdown theories’ (Rydgren 2007; della porta 2008; Caini 2012), while left-wing collective action has been addressed from the perspective of rational mobilisation theories. At the macro-level, right-wing mobilizations were often seen as negative reactions to social crises related to unemployment, immigration and economic uncertainties that resulted out of broad, long term processes of globalisation and modernisation (Lipset 1959; Betz 1994; Heitmeyer 2002; Ignazi 2003).
[Show full text]
DIW Weekly Report 7+8 2018
DIW Weekly Report 7+8 2018 AT A GLANCE German right-wing party AfD finds more support in rural areas with aging populations By Christian Franz, Marcel Fratzscher, and Alexander S. Kritikos • Correlations analyzed between German right-wing party AfD’s performance in the 2017 election and seven socioeconomic indicators at the electoral district level • Differences in unemployment rates, education levels, and shares of foreigners stand in minor relation to variation in AfD votes • In western Germany, low household income and share of manufacturing workers correlate with strong AfD performance • In eastern Germany, positive correlation between high density of craft businesses, aging popula- tions and strong AfD performance • Policies must focus in particular on rural areas with an unfavorable demographic trend In eastern German electoral districts where the AfD performed strongly, the share of elderly is higher than the German average AfD performance in the 2017 general election Share of those over 60 years old in the overall population Proportional vote. In percent, per electoral district In percent. Per electoral district. Data from 2015 under 7.5 percent under 21.3 percent 7.5 to 12.6 percent 21.3 to 24.4 percent 12.6 to 15 percent 24.4 to 27.6 percent 15 to 25 percent 27.6 to 30.8 percent 25 to 30 percent 30.8 to 33.9 percent over 30 percent over 33.9 percent Source: Authors‘ own calculations. © DIW Berlin 2018 FROM THE AUTHORS “Our study shows that in eastern Germany, the right-wing populist party AfD performed better in rural areas with aging populations.
[Show full text]