Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, 2001-2006

Home , Berlin Reinickendorf, Bochum I, Borken II, Dortmund I, Dortmund II, Dresden I

ICPSR 3808 Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, 2001-2006

Virginia Sapiro W. Philips Shively Comparative Study of Electoral Systems

First ICPSR Version February 2004

Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research P.O. Box 1248 Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 www.icpsr.umich.edu

Bibliographic Citation: Publications based on ICPSR data collections should acknowledge those sources by means of bibliographic citations. To ensure that such source attributions are captured for social science bibliographic utilities, citations must appear in footnotes or in the reference section of publications. The bibliographic citation for this data collection is:

Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Secretariat. COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS, 2001-2006 [Computer file]. ICPSR version. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies [producer], 2003. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2004.

Request for Information on To provide funding agencies with essential information about use of Use of ICPSR Resources: archival resources and to facilitate the exchange of information about ICPSR participants' research activities, users of ICPSR data are requested to send to ICPSR bibliographic citations for each completed manuscript or thesis abstract. Visit the ICPSR Web site for more information on submitting citations.

Data Disclaimer: The original collector of the data, ICPSR, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for uses of this collection or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses.

Responsible Use In preparing data for public release, ICPSR performs a number of Statement: procedures to ensure that the identity of research subjects cannot be disclosed. Any intentional identification or disclosure of a person or establishment violates the assurances of confidentiality given to the providers of the information. Therefore, users of data obtained from the ICPSR archive and/or any of its special topic archives agree:

• To use these datasets solely for statistical analysis and reporting of aggregated information, and not for investigation of specific individuals or organizations, except when identification is authorized in writing by ICPSR

• To make no use of the identity of any person or establishment discovered inadvertently, and to advise ICPSR of any such discovery

• To produce no links among ICPSR datasets or among ICPSR data and other datasets that could identify individuals or organizations

Redistribution: ICPSR data may not be redistributed or sold to other individuals, institutions, or organizations without the written agreement of ICPSR.

Data Collection Description

Principal Investigator(s): Virginia Sapiro, W. Philips Shively

Title: Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, 2001-2006

ICPSR Study Number: 3808

Funding Agency: National Science Foundation

Grant Number: CES-0112029

Summary: This study is an early release of 2001 and 2002 data from Module 2 of the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems. The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems is an ongoing collaborative program of crossnational research among national election studies designed to advance the understanding of electoral behavior across polities. The project, which is being carried out in over 50 consolidated and emerging democracies, was coordinated by social scientists from around the world who cooperated to specify the research agenda, the study design, and the micro- and macro-level data that native teams of researchers collected within each polity. To date, Module 2 has been administered as part of eight national post-election survey research projects. This Module 2 data file is an early release of 2001 data from Bulgaria and Poland and 2002 data from France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, New Zealand, and Portugal. The post-election survey results have been compiled and supplemented with district-level information that provide insight into the respondent's political context, and macro-level data that detail the respondent's political system as a whole. At each level of data collection, the measurements used have been standardized to promote comparison. Module 2 focuses on electoral institutions and political behavior, particularly on the fundamental principles of democratic governance: representation and accountability. It aims to examine how well different electoral institutions function as mechanisms by which citizens' views are represented in the policymaking process, and by which citizens hold their elected representatives accountable. This is accomplished by explicitly linking individual attitudes and behaviors to political context across a variety of settings. Demographic variables include respondents' age, sex, education, employment, and income.

Universe: All age-eligible citizens, or citizens of voting age of collaborating countries.

Sample: The data collection is a pooled crossnational sample of age-eligible citizens, yielding 12,887 cases.

Dates of Collection: 2001-2002

Data Collection Notes: (1) This is an advance release dataset. Information, updates, and error notifications and corrections will be posted on the CSES Module 2 errata page as they become available (http://www.umich.edu/~cses/download/module2/errata/errata.htm). (2) These data are preliminary and lack some of the checking, cleaning, processing, documentation, data, and variables that are usually part of a full release of a dataset. (3) Technical characteristics of the data file, such as variable and column widths, number of variables, and perhaps even some variable names, may change between the advance and full releases of a dataset. (4) The 1996-2001 data file (ICPSR 2683) includes 2002 Portugal data. The 2002 Portugal data are different from the 2002 Portugal data in the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, 2001-2006 (ICPSR 3808). (5) This crossnational dataset integrates data already fully processed by the study staffs of the individual countries, without further processing except for that which was essential for merging the data into the combined file. Where coded data for any deposited variables deviated too much from the coding scheme required by the CSES codebook, data for such variables were excluded. (6) For some countries, a machine-readable file for appendix documentation was not deposited or was incomplete. Wherever possible, Secretariat staff incorporated documentary information from other deposited sources, including printed matter such as tables of frequency distributions with assigned code labels. (7) Because of the variance in the sample designs used in the election studies included in this project, the weights (variables B1010-B1014) provided by the collaborators also vary greatly. They are described in detail in the codebook. Analysts are advised to read this section carefully to ensure that their analyses are weighted appropriately. (8) The codebook for Part 1 of this collection contains characters with diacritical marks used in many European languages, which are unprintable in the original character format being released. (9) The codebook is provided by ICPSR as a Portable Document Format (PDF) file. The PDF file format was developed by Adobe Systems Incorporated and can be accessed using PDF reader software, such as the Adobe Acrobat Reader. Information on how to obtain a copy of the Acrobat Reader is provided on the ICPSR Web site.

Data Source: personal interviews, phone interviews, and mailback questionnaires

Extent of Collection: 1 data file + machine-readable documentation (PDF) + SAS data definition statements + SPSS data definition statements

Extent of Processing: MDATA.PR/ REFORM.DOC

Data Format: Logical Record Length with SAS and SPSS data definition statements, Stata system file

File Specifications

Part Part Name File Structure Case Variable LRECL Records No. Count Count Per Case 1 Data file rectangular 12,887 211 1,060 1 ======

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS (CSES) - MODULE 2 (2001-2006)

CODEBOOK: INTRODUCTION

ADVANCE RELEASE DATASET: MAY 1, 2003

CSES Secretariat Center for Political Studies Institute for Social Research The University of Michigan

======

The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, Center for Political Studies, University of Michigan. Electronic resources from the CSES World Wide Website (www.umich.edu/~cses). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies [producer and distributor], 1995-2003.

These materials are based on work supported by the National Science Foundation (www.nsf.gov) under grant number CES-0112029 and the Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.

Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in these materials are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the funding agencies.

IMPORTANT NOTE REGARDING ADVANCE RELEASES:

This dataset and all accompanying documentation is an "Advance Release" of CSES Module 2 (2001-2006).

By definition, an Advance Release is a preliminary version of a dataset, and thus lacks some of the checking, cleaning, processing, documentation, data, and variables that are usual to the Full Release of a dataset.

For instance, many election studies that will eventually be present in the CSES Module 2 Full Release are not available in this file. Because Module 2 extends through the year 2006, many of the elections whose election studies will contain CSES Module 2 have not yet been conducted.

You may also find that technical characteristics of the file, such as variable and column widths, number of variables, and perhaps even some variable names, change between the Advance and Full releases of a dataset. If you plan to run analyses on the Advance Release, and then run them again on the Full Release when it is available, please prepare your programming to be as flexible and well-documented as possible so that it can accommodate changes in the dataset between now and then.

We hope that until such time as the Full Release of CSES Module 2 is available, users will find this and future CSES Module 2 Advance Release files to be helpful in their work.

======

======TABLE OF CONTENTS ======

))) HOW TO USE THE CSES MODULE 2 DOCUMENTATION

>>> TYPES OF DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE >>> CODEBOOK CONVENTIONS

))) HOW TO USE THE CSES MODULE 2 DATA FILES **************not applicable if data was obtained from ICPSR*************** >>> USING CSES MODULE 2 IN SAS >>> USING CSES MODULE 2 IN SPSS >>> USING CSES MODULE 2 IN STATA

))) IDENTIFICATION VARIABLES

))) WEIGHTS

))) LIST OF ELECTIONS INCLUDED IN CORE FILE

))) CSES PROJECT PROFILE

>>> CSES MODULE 2 (2001-2006) STUDY DESCRIPTION >>> MICRO-LEVEL COMPONENT >>> DISTRICT-LEVEL COMPONENT >>> MACRO-LEVEL COMPONENT >>> NOTE CONCERNING MISSING DATA

))) BIBLIOGRAPHY

======))) HOW TO USE THE CSES MODULE 2 DOCUMENTATION ======

------>>> TYPES OF DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE ------

There are many components to the CSES Documentation, and analysts will want to become familiar with all of them.

For some election studies, collaborators have provided multiple documents:

1. A "Macro Report" 2. A "Sample Design and Data Collection Report" 3. An untranslated version of their election study questionnaire 4. Where applicable, a translation of their questionnaire into English

These documents, where available, can be found on the CSES web page (www.umich.edu/~cses), in the Module 2 section under "Download Data".

The CSES Module 2 Micro Questionnaire is also available from the Module 2 download page, or by referencing the corresponding variables in this codebook.

The codebook file you are reading now includes general information about how to use the CSES Module 2 files, an overview of the CSES and Module 2 data, general election study descriptions and notes, and a bibliography. It also includes variable descriptions, including questions, code frames, general notes, and notes specific to an election study (by variable). Finally, Appendix I contains party information.

The last documentation set you will want to become familiar with is the CSES Module 2 errata page. It is available off of the "Download Data" page for Module 2 on the CSES website. Information, updates, and error notifications and corrections are posted there in real time as they become available, so you will want to check the page often to keep up-to-date.

Please note that your ability to read foreign characters may vary depending on the software you are using. While the collaborator pieces of the documentation are generally presented in Adobe PDF format, the codebook is saved as a standard text file, which is best viewed in a text editor such as Notepad, TextPad, or many other readily-available softwares. If you read the codebook into a word processor, you will want to select a font that lines the columns up appropriately.

------>>> CODEBOOK CONVENTIONS ------

In the advance release of CSES Module 2, all variables begin with the letter "B". This convention helps reduce the possibility of overwriting data when merging data sets.

Variables are presented in five groupings:

B1001-B1999 identification, weight, and election study variables

B2001-B2999 demographic variables B3001-B3999 micro-level data (the CSES Module 2 Questionnaire) B4001-B4999 district-level data B5001-B5999 macro-level data

Variable names are separated off by two lines of dashes. Variable names do not exceed eight characters in length. In the variable descriptions portion of codebook file, the leftmost eight columns are intended to be for variable names only.

Most sections of the codebook can be navigated in the machine-readable files by searching for the characters ">>>" or ")))" as appropriate.

======))) HOW TO USE THE CSES MODULE 2 DATA FILES ======**************not applicable if data was obtained from ICPSR***************

The CSES Module 2 Data Set is distributed in a single file, called "csesmod2.zip". We recommend that users download this file to their local computer in a directory called "c:/cses/module2/20030501/", where the last subdirectory indicates the version (2003, May 1). This arrangement not only allows the distributed files to run without modification, but sets your files up in a way that is well-organized for future distributions of CSES data files.

Within "csesmod2.zip" are seven (7) files:

"cm2_cod1.txt" is the codebook introduction file "cm2_cod2.txt" is the codebook variable descriptions file "cm2_cod3.txt" is the codebook appendices file "cm2_dat.txt" is the raw data file "sas.zip" contains statements for reading the data into SAS "spss.zip" contains statements for reading the data into SPSS "stata.zip" contains statements for reading the data into STATA

You need only unZIP files for the statistical package you wish to use (SAS, SPSS, or STATA). If you wish to use none of the three, the "cm2_dat.txt" file is stored with a header statement and delimiters (commas) so that you may read it into a software package of your choice.

------>>> USING CSES MODULE 2 IN SAS ------**************not applicable if data was obtained from ICPSR***************

In the "sas.zip" file are six (6) files:

"cm2_clab.sas" contains code labels "cm2_col.sas" contains column locations "cm2_fmt.sas" contains format statements "cm2_md.sas" contains missing data statements "cm2_run.sas" is the file you execute to make a SAS system file "cm2_vlab.sas" contains variable labels

You need only read into SAS the syntax file "cm2_run.sas". If you downloaded the files to the recommended subdirectory, you should be able to execute the file as is and a SAS system file will be created in the same subdirectory.

The file "cm2_run.sas" refers to the other files above in the body of the file - if you wish to exclude any of the other files from running on your data set (for instance, perhaps you do not wish to have code labels appear) you may comment out or delete the reference from the "cm2_run.sas" file.

If you are storing any of the files in an alternate location (including the data file "cm2_dat.txt"), or you want to store the resulting SAS system file under a different name or location, you will want to modify the SAS files accordingly.

Additional instructions are found in the "cm2_run.sas" file.

------>>> USING CSES MODULE 2 IN SPSS ------**************not applicable if data was obtained from ICPSR***************

In the "spss.zip" file are five (5) files:

"cm2_clab.sps" contains code labels "cm2_col.sps" contains column locations and variable labels "cm2_md.sps" contains missing data statements "cm2_run.sps" is the file you execute to make a SPSS system file "cm2_vlab.sps" contains variable labels

You need only read into SPSS the syntax file "cm2_run.sps". If you downloaded the files to the recommended subdirectory, you should be able to execute the file as is and a SPSS system file will be created in the same subdirectory.

The file "cm2_run.sps" refers to the other files above in the body of the file - if you wish to exclude any of the other files from running on your data set (for instance, perhaps you do not wish to have code labels appear) you may comment out or delete the reference from the "cm1_run.sps" file.

If you are storing any of the files in an alternate location (including the data file "cm2_dat.txt"), or you want to store the resulting SPSS system file under a different name or location, you will want to modify the SPSS files accordingly.

Additional instructions are found in the "cm1_run.sps" file.

------>>> USING CSES MODULE 2 IN STATA ------**************not applicable if data was obtained from ICPSR***************

In the "stata.zip" file are six (6) files:

"cm2_clab.do" contains code labels "cm2_col.dct" contains column locations "cm2_fmt.do" contains format statements "cm2_md.do" contains missing data statements "cm2_run.do" is the file you execute to make a STATA system file "cm2_vlab.do" contains variable labels

You need only read into STATA the syntax file "cm1_run.do". If you downloaded the files to the recommended subdirectory, you should be able to execute the file as is and a STATA system file will be created in the same subdirectory.

The file "cm2_run.do" refers to the other files above in the body of the file - if you wish to exclude any of the other files from running on your data set (for instance, perhaps you do not wish to have code labels appear) you may comment out or delete the reference from the "cm2_run.do" file.

If you are storing any of the files in an alternate location (including the data file "cm2_dat.txt"), or you want to store the resulting STATA system file under a different name or location, you will want to modify the STATA files accordingly.

Additional instructions are found in the "cm2_run.do" file.

======))) IDENTIFICATION VARIABLES ======

Each record in CSES Module 2 contains two key identification variables.

The first is ELECTION STUDY, which uniquely identifies an election study across time. It appears in two variations:

B1003 "ID VARIABLE - ELECTION STUDY (NUMERIC POLITY)" B1004 "ID VARIABLE - ELECTION STUDY (ALPHABETIC POLITY)"

The second is RESPONDENT, which uniquely identifies a respondent across time:

B1005 >>> ID VARIABLE - RESPONDENT

Notes on their creation and use are available in the Variable Descriptions portion of the codebook.

======))) WEIGHTS ======

Because of the variance in the sample designs used in the election studies included in this project, the weights provided by the collaborators also vary greatly. They are described in detail in variables B1010-B1014. Analysts are advised to read this section carefully to ensure that their analyses are weighted appropriately.

======))) LIST OF ELECTIONS INCLUDED IN CORE FILE ======

The CSES Module 2 Advance Release data report on the elections held in the following eight (8) countries since 2001:

Bulgaria 2001 1482 France 2002 1000 Germany 2002 2000 Hungary 2002 1200 Ireland 2002 2367 New Zealand 2002 1741 Poland 2001 1794 Portugal 2002 1303

TOTAL 12887

NOTES: Multi-wave panel studies. Only those respondents who participated in the wave of the study that included the CSES Module are included in the CSES core data-files. Analysts should be aware that the subsamples included in the CSES core data-files differ from the original samples drawn in the following countries: Ireland and New Zealand. Analysts should refer to the "Sample Design and Data Collection Reports" prepared by the collaborators in these countries for more details.

======))) CSES PROJECT PROFILE ======

The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES) is a collaborative program of cross-national public opinion research. A standard survey module, CSES Module 2, has been administered as part of eight (8) national post-election survey research projects. The CSES Secretariat, with the help of the collaborators in each participant country, has compiled these data and supplemented them with socio-demographic information about each respondent. To facilitate cross-national comparative analyses, these micro-level data have been further supplemented with district-level information that provide insight into the respondent's political context, and macro-level data that detail the respondent's political system as a whole. At each level of data collection, the measurements used have been standardized to promote comparison.

By collaborating in this way, the CSES community hopes to forward scientific inquiry into the relationship between electoral institutions and political behavior. In particular, CSES Module 2 focuses on the fundamental principles of democratic governance: representation and accountability. By explicitly linking individual attitudes and behaviors to political context across a variety of settings, CSES Module 2 allows analysts to examine how well different electoral institutions function as mechanisms by which citizens' views are represented in the policy making process, and by which citizens hold their elected representatives accountable.

------>>> CSES MODULE 2 (2001-2006) STUDY DESCRIPTION ------

The Module 2 materials include public opinion survey data, supplementary demographic data, district-level and macro data collected in eight (8) election studies, usually in the weeks following national elections held between 2001 and 2006.

The CSES Planning Committee continues to oversee every stage of the project's development, including the design of the survey instrument, demographic and macro measures. The various reports, documents and pilot studies prepared by members of the Planning Committee in the course of Module 2 development are avaialable on the CSES website.

CSES relies on the collaborators in each country to ensure that the data are collected in the most transparent and reliable way possible. The micro-level component of the data collection exercise is documented in the "Sample Design and Data Collection Reports" completed by each collaborator, and available on the CSES website. A list of the collaborator(s) for each country is also available on the CSES website.

------>>> MICRO-LEVEL COMPONENT ------

The CSES module was usually administered as a single, uninterrupted block of questions at the beginning or the end of a national election survey. There are several features of this component of which analysts should be aware:

A. The question text is included in the variable documentation of this codebook. The questions are reported in the order in which they appear in the questionnaire.

B. Where there are known differences in the way a particular question was administered in an election study, this is noted in the "Election Study Notes," following the documentation of the corresponding variable.

C. There are several sets of party and leader evaluation items included in the module. These correspond to parties labeled A-F, in descending order, the six most popular parties in the lower house elections (or presidential elections if legislative elections were not held). Where respondents were asked to evaluate other parties, these evaluations have been included and are labeled parties G-I, regardless of their vote shares. The parties and leaders to which these evaluations apply are identified in Appendix 1.

D. There are several questions (including the vote-choice and party identification items) which ask the respondents to specify a political party. The codes for these items are also reported in Appendix 1.

------>>> DISTRICT-LEVEL COMPONENT ------

The district-level variables report the returns of the lower house (first segment) election for each respondent's district. Wherever possible these data have been collected from official electoral commissions (see Bibliography for details). In other cases, CSES has been grateful for the compilations of these data provided by projects like "Political Transformation and the Electoral Process in Post-Communist Europe" project election database (www.essex.ac.uk/elections/). The following district-level data are included in the CSES datafile (X's indicate availability):

# Seats #Candidates/ Vote Turnout Lists Returns

Bulgaria France [NA- Presidential Election] Germany X X X X Hungary Ireland X X X X New Zealand X X X Poland X X X X Portugal X X X X

------>>> MACRO-LEVEL COMPONENT ------

To supplement the micro data, the teams of researchers responsible for the collection of the public opinion data also compiled and deposited electoral legislation, political party platforms, and official electoral returns.

To facilitate this process, a detailed questionnaire was constructed to serve as a framework for the macro component of the project. The Macro Data Reports completed by the CSES collaborators can be found on the CSES website in the Module 2 section under "Download Data".

Additional measures, thought pertinent to the micro-district- macro design, are also compiled and available in the CSES datafiles. A bibliography of the sources consulted follows the main body of these introductory materials.

------>>> NOTE CONCERNING MISSING DATA ------

In the micro component of the project, there is some ambiguity regarding which response categories have been included in the "missing" category (usually indicated with a last digit of 7) in the component election studies of the CSES project. Researchers should be aware that in cases where we could not distinguish in this category, the code may also include those who have refused to answer a particular question, indicated that they "didn't know," were not asked the question, or otherwise did not provide an answer to a particular item.

======))) BIBLIOGRAPHY ======

"2002 General Election Official Result." Retrieved April 30, 2003 [http://www.electionresults.govt.nz/].

"Erst-und Zweitstimmen in allen Wahlkreisen im csv-Format für eine Weiterverarbeitung in einem Tabellenkalkulationsprogramm [datafile]." Retrieved April 4, 2003 from [http://www.bundeswahlleiter.de/ bundestagswahl2002/deutsch/ergebnis2002/btw2002/index_btw2002.htm.]

"Ministere de l'interieur: Election presidentielle 2002." Retrieved April 30, 2004 [http://www.interieur.gouv.fr/avotreservice/elections/ presid2002/].

"Parliamentary Elections in Hungary 2002." Retrieved April 20, 2003 [http://www.election.hu/en/13/13_6.html].

"Project on Political Transformation and the Electoral Process in Post-Communist Europe. Poland - Constituency Data (2001)." Retrieved April 3, 2003 [http://www2.essex.ac.uk/elect/database/ indexConstituency.asp?country=POLAND&constituency=pl2001s].

"Republic of Bulgaria National Assembly: Elections for the 39th National Assembly." Retrieved January 1, 2003 from [http://www.parliament.bg/en/ parliament.php?id=7].

"Results for the 29th Dail." Elections Ireland. Retrieved April 4, 2003 from [http://www.electionsireland.org].

"Legislativas 2002." Results of elections in Portugal retrieved July 12, 2002, from [http://www.eleicoes.mj.pt/legislativas/D230000/230000_IS.html].

//END OF FILE======

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS (CSES) - MODULE 2 (2001-2006)

CODEBOOK: VARIABLE DESCRIPTIONS

ADVANCE RELEASE DATASET: MAY 1, 2003

CSES Secretariat Center for Political Studies Institute for Social Research The University of Michigan

======

These materials are based on work supported by the National Science Foundation (www.nsf.gov) under grant number CES-0112029 and the Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.

Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in these materials are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the funding agencies.

IMPORTANT NOTE REGARDING ADVANCE RELEASES:

This dataset and all accompanying documentation is an "Advance Release" of CSES Module 2 (2001-2006).

We hope that until such time as the Full Release of CSES Module 2 is available, users will find this and future CSES Module 2 Advance Release files to be helpful in their work.

======

======TABLE OF CONTENTS ======

))) CSES MODULE 2 VARIABLE LIST

))) CSES MODULE 2 MICRO-LEVEL DATA: IDENTIFICATION, WEIGHTING, AND STUDY ADMINISTRATION VARIABLES

))) CSES MODULE 2 MICRO-LEVEL DATA: DEMOGRAPHIC, VOTE CHOICE, AND ELECTION VARIABLES

))) CSES MODULE 2 MICRO-LEVEL DATA: SURVEY VARIABLES

======))) CSES MODULE 2 VARIABLE LIST ======

))) CSES MODULE 2 MICRO-LEVEL DATA: IDENTIFICATION, WEIGHTING, AND STUDY ADMINISTRATION VARIABLES

B1001 >>> DATASET B1002 >>> DATASET VERSION B1003 >>> ID VARIABLE - ELECTION STUDY (NUMERIC POLITY) B1004 >>> ID VARIABLE - ELECTION STUDY (ALPHABETIC POLITY) B1005 >>> ID VARIABLE - RESPONDENT B1006 >>> ID COMPONENT - POLITY B1007 >>> ID COMPONENT - SAMPLE COMPONENT B1008 >>> ID COMPONENT - ELECTION YEAR B1009 >>> ID COMPONENT - RESPONDENT WITHIN ELECTION STUDY B1010_1 >>> ORIGINAL WEIGHT: SAMPLE B1010_2 >>> ORIGINAL WEIGHT: DEMOGRAPHIC B1010_3 >>> ORIGINAL WEIGHT: POLITICAL B1011_1 >>> FACTOR: MEAN OF SAMPLE WEIGHT B1011_2 >>> FACTOR: MEAN OF DEMOGRAPHIC WEIGHT B1011_3 >>> FACTOR: MEAN OF POLITICAL WEIGHT B1012_1 >>> POLITY WEIGHT: SAMPLE B1012_2 >>> POLITY WEIGHT: DEMOGRAPHIC

B1012_3 >>> POLITY WEIGHT: POLITICAL B1013 >>> FACTOR: SAMPLE SIZE ADJUSTMENT B1014_1 >>> DATASET WEIGHT: SAMPLE B1014_2 >>> DATASET WEIGHT: DEMOGRAPHIC B1014_3 >>> DATASET WEIGHT: POLITICAL B1015 >>> ELECTION TYPE B1016 >>> DATE 1ST ROUND ELECTION BEGAN - MONTH B1017 >>> DATE 1ST ROUND ELECTION BEGAN - DAY B1018 >>> DATE 1ST ROUND ELECTION BEGAN - YEAR B1019 >>> DATE 2ND ROUND ELECTION BEGAN - MONTH B1020 >>> DATE 2ND ROUND ELECTION BEGAN - DAY B1021 >>> DATE 2ND ROUND ELECTION BEGAN - YEAR B1022 >>> STUDY TIMING B1023 >>> MODE OF INTERVIEW B1024 >>> INTERVIEWER WITHIN ELECTION STUDY B1025 >>> INTERVIEWER GENDER B1026 >>> DATE QUESTIONNAIRE ADMINISTERED - MONTH B1027 >>> DATE QUESTIONNAIRE ADMINISTERED - DAY B1028 >>> DATE QUESTIONNAIRE ADMINISTERED - YEAR

))) CSES MODULE 2 MICRO-LEVEL DATA: DEMOGRAPHIC, VOTE CHOICE, AND ELECTION VARIABLES

B2001 >>> AGE B2002 >>> GENDER B2003 >>> EDUCATION B2004 >>> MARITAL STATUS B2005 >>> UNION MEMBERSHIP B2006 >>> UNION MEMBERSHIP OF OTHERS IN HOUSEHOLD B2007 >>> BUSINESS OR EMPLOYERS' ASSOCIATION MEMBERSHIP B2008 >>> FARMERS' ASSOCIATION MEMBERSHIP B2009 >>> PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION MEMBERSHIP B2010 >>> CURRENT EMPLOYMENT STATUS B2011 >>> MAIN OCCUPATION B2012 >>> SOCIO ECONOMIC STATUS B2013 >>> EMPLOYMENT TYPE - PUBLIC OR PRIVATE B2014 >>> INDUSTRIAL SECTOR B2015 >>> SPOUSE: CURRENT EMPLOYMENT STATUS B2016 >>> SPOUSE: OCCUPATION B2017 >>> SPOUSE: SOCIO ECONOMIC STATUS B2018 >>> SPOUSE: EMPLOYMENT TYPE - PUBLIC OR PRIVATE B2019 >>> SPOUSE: INDUSTRIAL SECTOR B2020 >>> HOUSEHOLD INCOME B2021 >>> NUMBER IN HOUSEHOLD B2022 >>> NUMBER OF CHILDREN IN HOUSEHOLD UNDER AGE 18 B2023 >>> RELIGIOUS SERVICES ATTENDANCE B2024 >>> RELIGIOSITY B2025 >>> RELIGIOUS DENOMINATION B2026 >>> LANGUAGE USUALLY SPOKEN AT HOME B2027 >>> REGION OF RESIDENCE B2028 >>> RACE B2029 >>> ETHNICITY B2030 >>> RURAL OR URBAN RESIDENCE B2031 >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICT B2032 >>> DAYS INTERVIEW CONDUCTED POST ELECTION

))) CSES MODULE 2 MICRO-LEVEL DATA: SURVEY VARIABLES

B3001_1 >>> POLITICAL PARTICIPATION: PERSUADE OTHERS B3001_2 >>> POLITICAL PARTICIPATION: CAMPAIGN ACTIVITIES B3002_1 >>> HOW OFTEN DID R PERSUADE OTHERS B3002_2 >>> HOW OFTEN DID R PARTICIPATE IN CAMPAIGN ACTIVITIES B3003 >>> CONTACTED BY CANDIDATE OR PARTY DURING CAMPAIGN B3004_1 >>> CURRENT ELECTION: DID RESPONDENT CAST A BALLOT 1 B3004_2 >>> CURRENT ELECTION: DID RESPONDENT CAST A BALLOT 2 B3005_1 >>> CURRENT ELECTION: VOTE CHOICE - PRESIDENT 1 B3005_2 >>> CURRENT ELECTION: VOTE CHOICE - PRESIDENT 2 B3006_1 >>> CURRENT ELECTION: VOTE CHOICE - LOWER HOUSE 1 B3006_2 >>> CURRENT ELECTION: VOTE CHOICE - LOWER HOUSE 2 B3007_1 >>> CURRENT ELECTION: VOTE CHOICE - UPPER HOUSE 1 B3007_2 >>> CURRENT ELECTION: VOTE CHOICE - UPPER HOUSE 2

B3007_3 >>> CURRENT ELECTION: VOTE CHOICE - UPPER HOUSE 3 B3007_4 >>> CURRENT ELECTION: VOTE CHOICE - UPPER HOUSE 4 B3008 >>> CURRENT ELECTION: DID R CAST CANDIDATE PREFERENCE VOTE B3009 >>> MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE B3010 >>> GOVERNMENT PERFORMANCE: MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE B3011 >>> GOVERNMENT PERFORMANCE: GENERAL B3012 >>> SATISFACTION WITH DEMOCRACY B3013 >>> WHO IS IN POWER CAN MAKE DIFFERENCE B3014 >>> WHO PEOPLE VOTE FOR MAKES A DIFFERENCE B3015 >>> DEMOCRACY BETTER THAN ANY OTHER FORM OF GOVERNMENT B3016 >>> PREVIOUS ELECTION: DID RESPONDENT CAST A BALLOT B3017 >>> PREVIOUS ELECTION: VOTE CHOICE - PRESIDENT B3018_1 >>> PREVIOUS ELECTION: VOTE CHOICE - LOWER HOUSE 1 B3018_2 >>> PREVIOUS ELECTION: VOTE CHOICE - LOWER HOUSE 2 B3019_1 >>> PREVIOUS ELECTION: VOTE CHOICE - UPPER HOUSE 1 B3019_2 >>> PREVIOUS ELECTION: VOTE CHOICE - UPPER HOUSE 2 B3019_3 >>> PREVIOUS ELECTION: VOTE CHOICE - UPPER HOUSE 3 B3020 >>> PREVIOUS ELECTION: DID R CAST CANDIDATE PREFERENCE VOTE B3021 >>> PERFORMANCE OF PARTY R VOTED FOR IN PREVIOUS ELECTION B3022 >>> HOW WELL VOTERS' VIEWS ARE REPRESENTED IN ELECTIONS B3023 >>> IS THERE A PARTY THAT REPRESENTS R'S VIEWS B3024 >>> PARTY THAT REPRESENTS R'S VIEWS BEST B3025 >>> IS THERE A LEADER THAT REPRESENTS R'S VIEWS B3026 >>> LEADER THAT REPRESENTS R'S VIEWS B3027 >>> QUESTIONNAIRE USED - LONG OR SHORT B3028 >>> ARE YOU CLOSE TO ANY POLITICAL PARTY B3029_1 >>> PARTY CLOSEST TO - 1ST MENTION B3029_2 >>> PARTY CLOSEST TO - 2ND MENTION B3029_3 >>> PARTY CLOSEST TO - 3RD MENTION B3030 >>> NUMBER OF PARTIES MENTIONED IN A3005 B3031_1 >>> BLOCK PARTY CLOSEST TO - 1ST MENTION

B3031_2 >>> BLOCK PARTY CLOSEST TO - 2ND MENTION B3031_3 >>> BLOCK PARTY CLOSEST TO - 3RD MENTION B3032 >>> NUMBER OF PARTIES MENTIONED IN A3007 B3033 >>> WHICH PARTY DO YOU FEEL CLOSEST TO B3034 >>> DO YOU FEEL CLOSER TO ONE PARTY B3035 >>> WHICH PARTY DO YOU FEEL CLOSER TO B3036 >>> DEGREE OF CLOSENESS TO THIS PARTY B3037_A >>> LIKE-DISLIKE - PARTY A B3037_B >>> LIKE-DISLIKE - PARTY B B3037_C >>> LIKE-DISLIKE - PARTY C B3037_D >>> LIKE-DISLIKE - PARTY D B3037_E >>> LIKE-DISLIKE - PARTY E B3037_F >>> LIKE-DISLIKE - PARTY F B3037_G >>> LIKE-DISLIKE - ADDITIONAL - PARTY G B3037_H >>> LIKE-DISLIKE - ADDITIONAL - PARTY H B3037_I >>> LIKE-DISLIKE - ADDITIONAL - PARTY I B3038_A >>> LEFT-RIGHT - PARTY A B3038_B >>> LEFT-RIGHT - PARTY B B3038_C >>> LEFT-RIGHT - PARTY C B3038_D >>> LEFT-RIGHT - PARTY D B3038_E >>> LEFT-RIGHT - PARTY E B3038_F >>> LEFT-RIGHT - PARTY F B3038_G >>> LEFT-RIGHT - ADDITIONAL - PARTY G B3038_H >>> LEFT-RIGHT - ADDITIONAL - PARTY H B3038_I >>> LEFT-RIGHT - ADDITIONAL - PARTY I B3039_A >>> LEFT-RIGHT - LEADER A B3039_B >>> LEFT-RIGHT - LEADER B B3039_C >>> LEFT-RIGHT - LEADER C B3039_D >>> LEFT-RIGHT - LEADER D B3039_E >>> LEFT-RIGHT - LEADER E B3039_F >>> LEFT-RIGHT - LEADER F B3039_G >>> LEFT-RIGHT - ADDITIONAL - LEADER G B3039_H >>> LEFT-RIGHT - ADDITIONAL - LEADER H B3039_I >>> LEFT-RIGHT - ADDITIONAL - LEADER I B3040_A >>> OPTIONAL SCALE - PARTY A B3040_B >>> OPTIONAL SCALE - PARTY B B3040_C >>> OPTIONAL SCALE - PARTY C B3040_D >>> OPTIONAL SCALE - PARTY D B3040_E >>> OPTIONAL SCALE - PARTY E B3040_F >>> OPTIONAL SCALE - PARTY F B3040_F >>> OPTIONAL SCALE - ADDITIONAL - PARTY G B3040_F >>> OPTIONAL SCALE - ADDITIONAL - PARTY H B3040_F >>> OPTIONAL SCALE - ADDITIONAL - PARTY I B3041_A >>> OPTIONAL SCALE - LEADER A B3041_B >>> OPTIONAL SCALE - LEADER B B3041_C >>> OPTIONAL SCALE - LEADER C B3041_D >>> OPTIONAL SCALE - LEADER D B3041_E >>> OPTIONAL SCALE - LEADER E B3041_F >>> OPTIONAL SCALE - LEADER F B3042_1 >>> POLITICAL PARTICIPATION: CONTACT POLITICIAN OR OFFICIAL B3042_2 >>> POLITICAL PARTICIPATION: PROTEST OR DEMOSTRATION B3042_3 >>> POLITICAL PARTICIPATION: WORK WITH OTHERS WHO SHARE CONCERNS B3043 >>> RESPECT FOR INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM AND HUMAN RIGHTS B3044 >>> HOW WIDESPREAD IS CORRUPTION B3045 >>> LEFT-RIGHT - SELF B3046 >>> OPTIONAL SCALE - SELF B3047_1 >>> POLITICAL INFORMATION ITEM - 1ST B3047_2 >>> POLITICAL INFORMATION ITEM - 2ND B3047_3 >>> POLITICAL INFORMATION ITEM - 3RD

))) CSES MODULE 2 DISTRICT-LEVEL VARIABLES

B4001 >>> NUMBER OF SEATS IN DISTRICT B4002 >>> NUMBER OF CANDIDATES IN DISTRICT B4003 >>> NUMBER OF PARTY LISTS IN DISTRICT B4004_A >>> PERCENT VOTE IN DISTRICT - PARTY A B4004_B >>> PERCENT VOTE IN DISTRICT - PARTY B B4004_C >>> PERCENT VOTE IN DISTRICT - PARTY C B4004_D >>> PERCENT VOTE IN DISTRICT - PARTY D B4004_E >>> PERCENT VOTE IN DISTRICT - PARTY E B4004_F >>> PERCENT VOTE IN DISTRICT - PARTY F B4005 >>> TURNOUT IN DISTRICT

))) CSES MODULE 2 MACRO-LEVEL VARIABLES

B5001_A >>> PERCENT VOTE - LOWER HOUSE - PARTY A B5001_B >>> PERCENT VOTE - LOWER HOUSE - PARTY B B5001_C >>> PERCENT VOTE - LOWER HOUSE - PARTY C B5001_D >>> PERCENT VOTE - LOWER HOUSE - PARTY D B5001_E >>> PERCENT VOTE - LOWER HOUSE - PARTY E B5001_F >>> PERCENT VOTE - LOWER HOUSE - PARTY F B5002_A >>> PERCENT SEATS - LOWER HOUSE - PARTY A B5002_B >>> PERCENT SEATS - LOWER HOUSE - PARTY B B5002_C >>> PERCENT SEATS - LOWER HOUSE - PARTY C B5002_D >>> PERCENT SEATS - LOWER HOUSE - PARTY D B5002_E >>> PERCENT SEATS - LOWER HOUSE - PARTY E B5002_F >>> PERCENT SEATS - LOWER HOUSE - PARTY F B5003_A >>> PERCENT VOTE - UPPER HOUSE - PARTY A B5003_B >>> PERCENT VOTE - UPPER HOUSE - PARTY B B5003_C >>> PERCENT VOTE - UPPER HOUSE - PARTY C B5003_D >>> PERCENT VOTE - UPPER HOUSE - PARTY D B5003_E >>> PERCENT VOTE - UPPER HOUSE - PARTY E B5003_F >>> PERCENT VOTE - UPPER HOUSE - PARTY F B5004_A >>> PERCENT SEATS - UPPER HOUSE - PARTY A B5004_B >>> PERCENT SEATS - UPPER HOUSE - PARTY B B5004_C >>> PERCENT SEATS - UPPER HOUSE - PARTY C B5004_D >>> PERCENT SEATS - UPPER HOUSE - PARTY D B5004_E >>> PERCENT SEATS - UPPER HOUSE - PARTY E B5004_F >>> PERCENT SEATS - UPPER HOUSE - PARTY F B5005_A >>> PERCENT VOTE - PRESIDENT - PARTY A B5005_B >>> PERCENT VOTE - PRESIDENT - PARTY B B5005_C >>> PERCENT VOTE - PRESIDENT - PARTY C B5005_D >>> PERCENT VOTE - PRESIDENT - PARTY D B5005_E >>> PERCENT VOTE - PRESIDENT - PARTY E B5005_F >>> PERCENT VOTE - PRESIDENT - PARTY F

======))) CSES MODULE 2 MICRO-LEVEL DATA: IDENTIFICATION, WEIGHTING, AND STUDY ADMINISTRATION VARIABLES ======

------B1001 >>> DATASET ------

Dataset......

CSES-MODULE-2. CSES Module 2

| NOTES: B1001 | | This variable reports the CSES module used in each election | study. Generally, Module 2 was used for election studies | conducted between the years 2001 and 2006, inclusive.

------B1002 >>> DATASET VERSION ------

Dataset version......

VER2003-MAY-01. Version of dataset released on May 1, 2003.

| NOTES: B1002 | | The version number corresponds to the date of the dataset's | release.

------B1003 >>> ID VARIABLE - ELECTION STUDY (NUMERIC POLITY) ------

Election Study Identifier, with Numeric Polity Component......

10002001. BULGARIA (2001) 25002002. FRANCE (2002) 27612002. GERMANY (2002) 34802002. HUNGARY (2002) 37202002. IRELAND (2002) 55402002. NEW ZEALAND (2002) 61602001. POLAND (2001) 62002002. PORTUGAL (2002)

| NOTES: B1003 | | This eight-character variable uniquely identifies an election | study within the CSES. | | The variable is constructed from two components, variable B1006 | (polity code) and B1008 (election year). | | The first three characters are the numeric version of the | country codes created by the United Nations Statistics Division | ("Countries or areas, codes and abbreviations", revised | 13 February 2002). | | The fourth character distinguishes between multiple studies | conducted within a single country, for the same election. | | The fifth through eighth characters correspond to the election | year as specified in variable B1008.

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - GERMANY (2002): B1003 | | Two studies from the Germany (2002) election have been | deposited with the CSES Secretariat. Only one of the studies | appears in this release of the data due to time constraints. | However, in anticipation of later adding the second study, for | the included study the fourth character in this identification | variable is set to "1". When the second study is added, that | study's fourth character will be set to "2" in order to | distinguish its records from those of the first study.

------B1004 >>> ID VARIABLE - ELECTION STUDY (ALPHABETIC POLITY) ------

Election Study Identifier, with Alphabetic Polity Component......

BGR_2001. BULGARIA (2001) DEU12002. GERMANY (2002) FRA_2002. FRANCE (2002) HUN_2002. HUNGARY (2002) IRL_2002. IRELAND (2002) NZL_2002. NEW ZEALAND (2002) POL_2001. POLAND (2001) PRT_2002. PORTUGAL (2002)

| NOTES: B1004 | | This eight-character variable uniquely identifies an election | study within the CSES. | | The variable is constructed from two components, variable B1006 | (polity code) and B1008 (election year). | | The first three characters are the alphabetic version of the | country codes created by the United Nations Statistics Division | ("Countries or areas, codes and abbreviations", revised | 13 February 2002). | | The fourth character distinguishes between multiple studies | conducted within a single country, for the same election. | | The fifth through eighth characters correspond to the election | year as specified in variable B1008. | | This variable may be useful to analysts using documents from | the CSES that are specific to an election study. One example | of this are the completed Macro Reports. Filenames for the | reports for a particular election study are prefaced by the | eight-character code that corresponds to that election study.

------B1005 >>> ID VARIABLE - RESPONDENT ------

Respondent Identifier, unique across dataset......

This variable is sixteen characters in length.

| NOTES: B1005 | | This sixteen-character variable uniquely identifies a | respondent within the CSES. | | The variable is constructed from three components, variable | B1006 (polity), B1008 (election year), and B1009 (respondent | within election study). | | The first three characters are the numeric version of the | country codes created by the United Nations Statistics Division | ("Countries or areas, codes and abbreviations", revised | 13 February 2002). | | The fourth character distinguishes between multiple studies | conducted within a single country for the same election. | All other election studies in CSES Module 2 are coded 0 here. | | The fifth through eighth characters correspond to the election | year as specified in variable B1008. | | The last eight characters are the respondent identifier from | B1009, which is unique within each election study.

------B1006 >>> ID COMPONENT - POLITY ------

Polity Identifier......

1000. BULGARIA 2500. FRANCE 2761. GERMANY 3480. HUNGARY 3720. IRELAND 5540. NEW ZEALAND 6160. POLAND 6200. PORTUGAL | NOTES: B1006 | | This four-character variable uniquely identifies a polity | conducting an election study that is present in CSES Module 2. | | The first three characters are the alphabetic version of the | country codes created by the United Nations Statistics Division | ("Countries or areas, codes and abbreviations", revised | 13 February 2002). | | The fourth character distinguishes between multiple studies | conducted with a single country, for the same election.

------B1007 >>> ID COMPONENT - SAMPLE COMPONENT ------

In some cases, analysts may wish to consider regions of countries or other sample components units of analysis, rather than the countries themselves. This variable identifies these sample components. Where these sample components do not exist this variable reports 001......

001. [SEE VARIABLE NOTES] . .

------B1008 >>> ID COMPONENT - ELECTION YEAR ------

Election year......

2001-2006. ELECTION YEAR

------B1009 >>> ID COMPONENT - RESPONDENT WITHIN ELECTION STUDY ------

Respondent identifier, unique for each survey respondent within an election study......

This variable is eight characters in length.

| NOTES: B1009 | | While this variable uniquely identifies a respondent within | an election study, it is not unique across the entire dataset.

------B1010_1 >>> ORIGINAL WEIGHT: SAMPLE B1010_2 >>> ORIGINAL WEIGHT: DEMOGRAPHIC B1010_3 >>> ORIGINAL WEIGHT: POLITICAL ------

| NOTES: B1010 | | These variables report the original weights provided with the | survey data by the deposit. | | Sample weights include those intended to correct for unequal | selection probabilities resulting from "booster" samples, | procedures for selection within the household, non-response, | as well as other features of the sample design. | | Demographic weights adjust sample distributions of socio- | demographic characteristics so that it more closely resembles | the characteristics of the population. | | Political weights reconcile discrepancies in the reported | electoral behavior of the survey respondents from the official | vote counts. | | In cases where a collaborator provides a single weight that is | a combination of one or more of the three weight categories | (sample, demographic, and political), the weight is duplicated | in the two or more appropriate variables. Thus, analysts using | two or more of the weights simultaneously will need to account | for this duplication. | | Use of weights is at the discretion of the analyst based upon | the considerations of their individual research question. We | recommend that analysts familiarize themselves with the | weights, their components, and their methods of creation before | applying them. | | Additionally, analysts will want to keep in mind that these | weights are prepared to be election study weights, not country | weights. To convert the weights to country weights requires an | adjustment for those countries for which one or more polities | or election studies appear in the dataset. | | Where a weight of a particular type is not available, these | variables are coded 1. | | Table: Summary of Election Study Weights, by Type of Weight. | | Sample Demographic Political No Weight | Weight Weight Weight Provided | | BULGARIA (2001) X | FRANCE (2002) X | GERMANY (2002) X X | HUNGARY (2002) X | IRELAND (2002) X X | NEW ZEALAND (2002) X X X | POLAND (2001) X X | PORTUGAL (2002) X

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - BULGARIA (2001): B1010-B1014 | | The weights adjust the sample to data provided by the National | Statistical Institute: gender, age, ethnicity, type of residence | (e.g. capital city vs. city vs. town vs. village).

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - GERMANY (2002): B1010-B1014 | | The sample weight corrects for oversampling of the East | German population and includes also demographic corrections | for gender, age groups, and education. This weight MUST be | used if Germany is analyzed as a whole. | | The demographic weight corrects for gender, age groups, and | education for East and West Germany separately. This weight | should be used analysing East and West Germany separately.

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - HUNGARY (2002): B1010-B1014 | | The Hungary 2002 demographic weight variable sets the size of | forty groups defined in terms of sex, age, place of residence | (urban vs. rural) and education equal in the sample to the joint | distribution of these four variables in the population estimates | provided by the Central Statistical Office for January 2001.

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - IRELAND (2002): B1010-B1014 | | The weight is constructed using a minimum information | loss routine with marginal constraints based on age, gender, | Principal Economic Status, region, marital status, level of | educational attainment, and household size (the number of | persons aged 18 years and older).

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - NEW ZEALAND (2002): B1010-B1014 | | The sample weight corrects for oversampling of the Maori | population. | | The demographic weight incorporates the sample correction, and | adjusts for the gender and age distributions of the respondents. | | The political weight incorporates the sample and demographic | weights, and adjusts the distribution of votes cast and non- | voting. | | Note, these weights are cumulative.

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - POLAND (2001): B1010-B1014 | | After realization, which was differentiated according to the | region and class of location, the obtained sample was not | automatically weighted, and had distributions of demographic | features different from GUS data. Therefore the study results | were weighted by means of especially designed software, which | takes into account: diverse choice probabilities, related to the | adopted sampling scheme (1 person per household regardless of | number of inhabitants); diversification of degree of realization | in town classes ex-post stratification and weighting to GUS data, | according to sex and age categories in town-rural area division.

------B1011_1 >>> FACTOR: MEAN OF SAMPLE WEIGHT B1011_2 >>> FACTOR: MEAN OF DEMOGRAPHIC WEIGHT B1011_3 >>> FACTOR: MEAN OF POLITICAL WEIGHT ------

| NOTES: B1011 | | These variables report the mean weight of each type, within each | polity.

------B1012_1 >>> POLITY WEIGHT: SAMPLE B1012_2 >>> POLITY WEIGHT: DEMOGRAPHIC B1012_3 >>> POLITY WEIGHT: POLITICAL ------

| NOTES: B1012 | | These variables report standardized versions (with | a mean 1 within the polity) of the original weights provided | with the component election studies, described in B1010. | They are the ratio of each weighting factor to the mean | weight (B1011) of each type, calculated within each polity.

------B1013 >>> FACTOR: SAMPLE SIZE ADJUSTMENT ------

| NOTES: B1013 | | This variable reports the ratio of the average sample | size to each election study sample. Note that this factor is | calculated on the basis of the samples appearing in the CSES | data files (i.e. does not incorporate booster samples, | panel respondents who did not participate in the CSES wave of | multi-wave studies, etc.). Further, this factor treats | elections, and not political systems, as the unit of analysis. | Analysts wishing to compare across-countries, instead of | across-election studies, should adjust this weight accordingly. | | IMPORTANT: | | Because the value for this variable can change as election | studies are added to the dataset, we have opted to set the | variable to 0 for all cases until the Full Release is available.

------B1014_1 >>> DATASET WEIGHT: SAMPLE B1014_2 >>> DATASET WEIGHT: DEMOGRAPHIC B1014_3 >>> DATASET WEIGHT: POLITICAL ------

| NOTES: B1014 | | These variables are intended for micro-level analyses | involving the entire CSES sample. Using the sample size | adjustment (B1013), the centered weights (B1012) are corrected | such that each election study component contributes equally to | the analysis, regardless of the original sample size. Users are | advised to read the notes of the preceding variables carefully | so as to ensure that their analyses will be weighted | appropriately.

| | IMPORTANT: | | Because the value for this variable can change as election | studies are added to the dataset, we have opted to set the | variable to 0 for all cases until the Full Release is available.

------B1015 >>> ELECTION TYPE ------

Type of election......

10. PARLIAMENTARY/LEGISLATIVE 12. PARLIAMENTARY/LEGISLATIVE AND PRESIDENTIAL 13. PARLIAMENTARY/LEGISLATIVE AND PRIME MINISTER 20. PRESIDENTIAL 30. HEAD OF GOVERNMENT

------B1016 >>> DATE 1ST ROUND ELECTION BEGAN - MONTH B1017 >>> DATE 1ST ROUND ELECTION BEGAN - DAY B1018 >>> DATE 1ST ROUND ELECTION BEGAN - YEAR

B1019 >>> DATE 2ND ROUND ELECTION BEGAN - MONTH B1020 >>> DATE 2ND ROUND ELECTION BEGAN - DAY B1021 >>> DATE 2ND ROUND ELECTION BEGAN - YEAR ------

Date [first round/second round] election began......

MONTH

01. JANUARY 02. FEBRUARY 03. MARCH 04. APRIL

05. MAY 06. JUNE 07. JULY 08. AUGUST 09. SEPTEMBER 10. OCTOBER 11. NOVEMBER 12. DECEMBER

97. MISSING

DAY

01-31. DAY OF MONTH

97. MISSING

YEAR

2001-2005. YEAR

9997. MISSING

| NOTES: B1016-B1021 | | If the election described in variable B1015 was held on a | single date, that date is represented in this variable. If the | election described in variable B1015 was held on more than | one date, this variable describes the earliest date.

------B1022 >>> STUDY TIMING ------

Timing of study relative to election......

1. POST-ELECTION STUDY 2. PRE-ELECTION AND POST-ELECTION STUDY 3. BETWEEN ROUNDS

------B1023 >>> MODE OF INTERVIEW ------

Mode of interview......

1. PERSONAL 2. TELEPHONE 3. SELF-ADMINISTERED (MAIL; SELF-COMPLETED SUPPLEMENT) 4. COMBINATION OF TELEPHONE AND MAIL-BACK 5. COMBINATION OF FACE-TO-FACE AND SELF-ADMINISTERED

7. MISSING

------B1024 >>> INTERVIEWER WITHIN ELECTION STUDY ------

Interviewer identification variable, within election study......

00001-99995. INTERVIEWER IDENTIFIER

99997. MISSING

| NOTES: B1024 | | This variable uniquely identifies an interviewer within an | election study. It is not unique across the entire dataset.

------B1025 >>> INTERVIEWER GENDER ------

Gender of interviewer......

1. MALE 2. FEMALE

7. MISSING

------B1026 >>> DATE QUESTIONNAIRE ADMINISTERED - MONTH B1027 >>> DATE QUESTIONNAIRE ADMINISTERED - DAY B1028 >>> DATE QUESTIONNAIRE ADMINISTERED - YEAR ------

Date that the questionnaire was administered......

MONTH

01. JANUARY 02. FEBRUARY 03. MARCH 04. APRIL 05. MAY 06. JUNE 07. JULY 08. AUGUST 09. SEPTEMBER 10. OCTOBER 11. NOVEMBER 12. DECEMBER

97. MISSING DAY

01-31. DAY OF MONTH

97. MISSING

YEAR

1996-2002. YEAR

9997. MISSING

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - PORTUGAL (2002): B1026-1028 | | The Portuguese questionnaire was administered between the 23rd | of March and the 8th of April 2002. This variable reports the | month in which the fieldwork began.

======))) CSES MODULE 2 MICRO-LEVEL DATA: DEMOGRAPHIC, VOTE CHOICE, AND ELECTION VARIABLES ======

------B2001 >>> AGE ------

D1. Age of respondent (in years)......

010-150. AGE, IN YEARS

998. DON'T KNOW 999. REFUSED

997. MISSING

------B2002 >>> GENDER ------

D2. Gender of respondent......

1. MALE 2. FEMALE

9. REFUSED

7. MISSING

------B2003 >>> EDUCATION ------

D3. Education of the respondent......

01. NONE 02. INCOMPLETE PRIMARY 03. PRIMARY COMPLETED 04. INCOMPLETE SECONDARY 05. SECONDARY COMPLETED 06. POST-SECONDARY TRADE / VOCATIONAL SCHOOL 07. UNIVERSITY UNDERGRADUATE DEGREE INCOMPLETE 08. UNIVERSITY UNDERGRADUATE DEGREE COMPLETED

09. [SEE VARIABLE NOTES]

98. DON'T KNOW 99. REFUSED

97. MISSING

| NOTES: B2003 | | The categories listed were constructed to indicate: | | Incomplete primary: R left school before completing the level | of education required (at the time R left school) for entry into | secondary school. | | Primary completed: R completed the level of education required | (at the time respondent left school) for entry into secondary | school, but has never attended secondary school. | | Incomplete secondary: R attended secondary school, but has never | achieved the minimum level of qualifications normally required | (at the time R left school) for entry into university or other | degree level higher education. Respondents currently studying | for such qualifications should also be included in this | category. | | Secondary completed: R has at least the minimum qualifications | normally required (at the time R left school) for entry into | university or other degree level higher education but has never | entered a university or other degree level course of higher | education. | | Post-secondary trade / vocational school: R has attended a | non-degree granting institution teaching a skilled trade, or | providing subdegree professional or technical. | | University incomplete: R has attended university or entered | other degree level of course of higher education but either left | before successful completion of an undergraduate level degree, | or has yet to complete a degree upon which currently embarked. | | University degree completed: R has undergraduate level or higher | degree.

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - GERMANY (2002): B2003 | | CSES Code Election Study Code/Category | 09. Other

------B2004 >>> MARITAL STATUS ------

D4. Respondent's marital status......

1. MARRIED OR LIVING TOGETHER AS MARRIED 2. WIDOWED 3. DIVORCED OR SEPARATED (MARRIED BUT SEPARATED / NOT LIVING WITH LEGAL SPOUSE) 4. SINGLE, NEVER MARRIED 8. DON'T KNOW 9. REFUSED

7. MISSING

| NOTES: B2004 | This variable reports the respondent's current marital status. | For instance, a person who is both divorced and living together | as married would be coded 1.

------B2005 >>> UNION MEMBERSHIP ------

D5. Union membership of respondent......

1. R IS MEMBER OF A UNION 2. R IS NOT A MEMBER OF A UNION

8. DON'T KNOW 9. REFUSED

7. MISSING

------B2006 >>> UNION MEMBERSHIP OF OTHERS IN HOUSEHOLD ------

D6. Someone in household other than respondent is a member of a union......

1. SOMEONE ELSE (OTHER THAN R) IS MEMBER OF A UNION 2. NO ONE ELSE (OTHER THAN R) IS A MEMBER OF A UNION

8. DON'T KNOW 9. REFUSED

7. MISSING

| NOTES: B2006 | | See also notes for variable B2005.

------B2007 >>> BUSINESS OR EMPLOYERS' ASSOCIATION MEMBERSHIP ------

D7. R is a member of a business or employers' association......

1. R IS A MEMBER OF A BUSINESS OR EMPLOYERS' ASSOCIATION 2. R IS NOT A MEMBER OF A BUSINESS OR EMPLOYERS' ASSOCIATION

8. DON'T KNOW 9. REFUSED

7. MISSING

------B2008 >>> FARMERS' ASSOCIATION MEMBERSHIP ------

D8. R is a member of a farmers' association......

1. R IS A MEMBER OF A FARMERS' ASSOCIATION 2. R IS NOT A MEMBER OF A FARMERS' ASSOCIATION

8. DON'T KNOW 9. REFUSED

7. MISSING

------B2009 >>> PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION MEMBERSHIP ------

D9. R is a member of a professional association......

1. R IS A MEMBER OF A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 2. R IS NOT A MEMBER OF A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION

8. DON'T KNOW 9. REFUSED

7. MISSING

------B2010 >>> CURRENT EMPLOYMENT STATUS ------

D10. Current employment status of respondent......

IN LABOR FORCE:

01. EMPLOYED - FULL TIME (32+ HOURS WEEKLY) 02. EMPLOYED - PART TIME (15-32 HOURS WEEKLY) 03. EMPLOYED - LESS THAN 15 HOURS 04. HELPING FAMILY MEMBER 05. UNEMPLOYED

NOT IN LABOR FORCE:

06. STUDENT, IN SCHOOL, IN VOCATIONAL TRAINING 07. RETIRED 08. HOUSEWIFE, HOME DUTIES 09. PERMANENTLY DISABLED 10. OTHERS, NOT IN LABOR FORCE

98. DON'T KNOW 99. REFUSED

97. MISSING

| NOTES: B2010 | | Respondents who are temporarily unemployed are coded UNEMPLOYED. | Respondents on "workfare" or enrolled in a government job | training program are coded EMPLOYED.

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - NEW ZEALAND (2002): B2010 | | CSES Code Election Study Code/Category | 01. Working full-time for pay or other income | (32 hours or more a week) | 02. Working part-time for pay or other income | (less than 32 hours a week) | 05. Unemployed, laid off, looking for work | 06. At school, university or other educational | institution | 07. Retired | 08. Unpaid work within the home | 09. Temporarily or permanently disabled, unable | to work | 10. Unpaid work outside the home | | The question format used allowed for multiple responses. | These have been handled in the following way: | | Multiple Response Categories CSES Code B1009 | 01, 02, 07, 09 01 2386 | 01, 02, 08, 10 01 3943 | 05, 08, 09, 10 05 623 | 05, 07, 08, 10 05 2524 | 01, 06, 10 01 2930 | 01, 08, 09 01 3619 | 01, 08, 10 01 3607, 4002 | 02, 06, 08 02 3408, 3429, 3551 | 3714 | 02, 06, 10 02 1035 | 02, 07, 09 02 3679 | 02, 07, 10 02 2080, 3125 | 02, 08, 10 02 1388, 2991, 3122 | 3249, 3485, 3581 | 05, 08, 10 05 515, 628, 1508 | 06, 07, 10 06 1651 | 07, 08, 10 07 1323, 2837, 3035 | 3090 | 08, 09, 10 08 924 | 01, 02 01 3474 | 01, 06 01 2100, 4383 | 01, 07 01 4021 | 01, 08 01 134, 3569 | 01, 10 01 407, 744 | 02, 05 02 762, 868 | 02, 06 02 842, 1449, 1554, | 1583, 1717, 1814, | 1965, 2110, 3057, | 3162, 3208, 3349, | 3907, 4155, 4284, | 4294, 4301 | 02, 07 02 2285, 3083, 3391 | 3534, 4251 | 02, 08 02 828, 909, 1748, | 1942, 1948, 2009, | 2034, 2521, 3068, | 3229, 3250, 3778, | 4339 | 02, 09 02 1994, 2073 | 02, 10 02 905, 2078, 3260, | 3960 | 05, 06 05 1109 | 05, 08 05 4016 | 05, 10 05 55, 938, 1309 | 1337, 2678 | 06, 08 06 2258, 2875, 3285 | 3423 | 07, 08 07 1535, 2374, 2710, | 2939, 3508, 3725, | 4129 | 07, 10 07 1728, 1936, 2652, | 4107 | 08, 09 08 3243 | 08, 10 08 686, 3940, 4146, | 4189 | 09, 10 09 3666, 3931

------B2011 >>> MAIN OCCUPATION ------

D11. Main occupation of respondent......

ARMED FORCES

01. ARMED FORCES

LEGISLATORS, SENIOR OFFICIALS, AND MANAGERS

11. LEGISLATORS AND SENIOR OFFICIALS 12. CORPORATE MANAGERS 13. GENERAL MANAGERS

PROFESSIONALS

21. PHYSICAL, MATHEMATICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCE 22. LIFE SCIENCE AND HEALTH PROFESSIONALS 23. TEACHING PROFESSIONALS 24. OTHER PROFESSIONALS

TECHNICIANS AND ASSOCIATED PROFESSIONALS

31. PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCE ASSOCIATE PROFESSIONALS 32. LIFE SCIENCE AND HEALTH ASSOCIATE PROFESSIONALS 33. TEACHING ASSOCIATE PROFESSIONALS 34. OTHER ASSOCIATE PROFESSIONALS

CLERKS

41. OFFICE CLERKS 42. CUSTOMER SERVICES CLERKS 43. ADMINISTRATION OF CHARITABLE OR NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS

SERVICES WORKERS AND SHOP AND MARKET SALES WORKERS

51. PERSONAL AND PROTECTIVE SERVICE WORKERS 52. MODELS, SALES PERSONS AND DEMONSTRATORS 53. TRADE, CONSUMER SERVICES

SKILLED AGRICULTURAL AND FISHERY WORKERS

61. MARKET-ORIENTED SKILLED AGRICULTURAL AND FISHERY WORKERS 62. SUBSISTENCE AGRICULTURAL AND FISHERY WORKERS

CRAFT AND RELATED TRADE WORKERS

71. EXTRACTION AND BUILDING TRADE WORKERS 72. METAL, MACHINERY AND RELATED TRADE WORKERS 73. PRECISION, HANDICRAFT, PRINTING AND RELATED TRADE WORKERS 74. OTHER CRAFT AND RELATED TRADES WORKERS

PLANT AND MACHINE OPERATORS AND ASSEMBLERS

81. STATIONARY-PLANT AND RELATED OPERATORS 82. MACHINE OPERATORS AND ASSEMBLERS 83. DRIVERS AND MOBILE-PLANT OPERATORS 84. OTHER PLANT AND MACHINE OPERATORS AND ASSEMBLERS

ELEMENTARY OCCUPATIONS

91. SALES AND SERVICES ELEMENTARY OCCUPATIONS 92. AGRICULTURAL, FISHERY AND RELATED LABORERS 93. LABORERS IN MINING, CONSTRUCTION, MANUFACTURING AND TRANSPORT 94. OTHER POSITIONS IN ELEMENTARY OCCUPATIONS

96. OTHER OR NON-CLASSIFIABLE OCCUPATIONS (NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO CLASSIFY)

98. DON'T KNOW 99. REFUSED

97. MISSING

| NOTES: B2011 | | See also notes for B2010. | | This variable reports the respondents' Main Occupation, that | is, the job at which the respondent spends most of the time or | if the respondent spends an equal amount of time on two jobs, it | is the one from which the respondent earns the most money. For | respondents who are currently employed, this variable reports | their current occupation. For respondents who are retired or not | currently working, code last occupation. | | Coding conventions shall employ the first two-digits of 1988 | ISCO / ILO International Standard Classification of Occupations | Code from the International Labor Office, CH-1211, Geneva 22, | Switzerland. | | In some cases it has not been possible to strictly adhere to the | ISCO/ILO conventions. Users will find that some categories have | been added to the ISCO/ILO list in order to accommodate the | occupations of respondents who were not easily classified. | Please refer to the Country Notes for clarification of anomalous | codes.

------B2012 >>> SOCIO ECONOMIC STATUS ------

D12. Respondent's socio economic status......

1. WHITE COLLAR 2. WORKER 3. FARMER 4. SELF-EMPLOYED

5. [SEE VARIABLE NOTES] 6. [SEE VARIABLE NOTES]

8. DON'T KNOW 9. REFUSED

7. MISSING

| NOTES: B2012 | | The categories are intended to distinguish among the following | groups: | | 01. White collar: broad occupational grouping of workers | engaged in nonmanual labor: Managers, salaried professionals, | office workers, sales personnel, and proprietors are generally | included in the category. | | 02. Worker: broad occupational grouping of workers engaged in | manual labor. | | 03. Farmer: Normally persons self-employed in farming. | | 04. Self-employed: Self-employed occupations of all kinds, | excluding self-employed farming. Includes, for example | entrepreneurs, shop keeper, professionals like lawyers, medical | doctors etc.

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - IRELAND (2002): B2012 | | Response categories 1-3 were created from B2011. | | B2012 B2011 | 1. 10-42, 52, 91. | 2. 51, 71-83, 92-93. | 3. 61-62.

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - NEW ZEALAND (2002): B2012 | | Response categories 1-3 were created from B2011. | | B2012 B2011 | 1. 10-42, 52, 91. | 2. 51, 71-83, 92-93. | 3. 61-62. | 5. 01

------B2013 >>> EMPLOYMENT TYPE - PUBLIC OR PRIVATE ------

D13. Whether respondent's employment is private or public......

1. PUBLIC SECTOR 2. PRIVATE SECTOR 3. MIXED 4. "THIRD SECTOR"/NON-PROFIT SECTOR

8. DON'T KNOW 9. REFUSED

7. MISSING

------B2014 >>> INDUSTRIAL SECTOR ------

D14. Industrial sector of respondent's employment......

1. PRIMARY SECTOR: AGRICULTURAL, FORESTRY, FISHERIES 2. SECONDARY SECTOR: INDUSTRY: MINING, CONSTRUCTION MANUFACTURING 3. TERTIARY SECTOR: TRANSPORTATION, COMMUNICATION AND OTHER PUBLIC UTILITIES, WHOLESALE TRADE, RETAIL TRADE, PERSONAL SERVICES FINANCE, INSURANCE, AND REAL ESTATE BUSINESS AND REPAIR SERVICES ENTERTAINMENT AND REPAIR SERVICES PROFESSIONAL AND RELATED SERVICES PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION ACTIVE MILITARY DUTY 4. OTHER

8. DON'T KNOW 9. REFUSED

7. MISSING

------B2015 >>> SPOUSE: CURRENT EMPLOYMENT STATUS ------

D15. Current employment status of respondent's spouse......

IN LABOR FORCE:

01. EMPLOYED - FULL TIME (32+ HOURS WEEKLY) 02. EMPLOYED - PART TIME (15-32 HOURS WEEKLY) 03. EMPLOYED - LESS THAN 15 HOURS 04. HELPING FAMILY MEMBER 05. UNEMPLOYED

NOT IN LABOR FORCE:

06. STUDENT, IN SCHOOL, IN VOCATIONAL TRAINING 07. RETIRED 08. HOUSEWIFE, HOME DUTIES 09. PERMANENTLY DISABLED 10. OTHERS, NOT IN LABOR FORCE

98. DON'T KNOW 99. REFUSED

97. MISSING

| NOTES: B2015 | | Spouses who are temporarily unemployed are coded UNEMPLOYED. | Respondents on "workfare" or enrolled in a government job | training program are coded EMPLOYED.

| Temporarily unemployed, not working, | unemployed: Others not in labor force

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - NEW ZEALAND (2002): B2015 | | CSES Code Election Study Code/Category | 01. Working full-time for pay or other income | (32 hours or more a week) | 02. Working part-time for pay or other income | (less than 32 hours a week) | 05. Unemployed, laid off, looking for work | 06. At school, university or other educational | institution | 07. Retired | 08. Unpaid work within the home | 09. Temporarily or permanently disabled, unable | to work | 10. Unpaid work outside the home | | The question format used alllowed for multiple responses. | These have been handled in the following way: | | Multiple Response Categories CSES Code B1009 | 02, 07, 08, 10 02 2129 | 01, 02, 05 01 2388 | 01, 08, 10 01 3607 | 02, 08, 09 02 417 | 07, 08, 09 07 2837 | 07, 08, 10 07 1323, 1936, 3090 | 4403 | 01, 02 01 3966 | 01, 07 01 3534 | 01, 06 01 2269, 3202 | 01, 08 01 828, 909, 3485, | 4339 | 01, 09 01 4171 | 01, 10 01 905 | 02, 05 02 3340 | 02, 06 02 226, 1789, 2084 | 2416, 3057, 3552 | 02, 07 02 3716, 3836, 3960 | 02, 08 02 71, 503, 623, | 1675, 2857, 3017 | 3270, 4448 | 02, 10 02 3051 | 06, 08 06 3603 | 07, 08 07 2710, 3035 | 07, 09 07 2828, 3812 | 08, 09 08 2086 | 08, 10 08 174, 3991, 4214, | 4377, 4435

------B2016 >>> SPOUSE: OCCUPATION ------

D16. Spouse's occupation......

ARMED FORCES

01. ARMED FORCES.

LEGISLATORS, SENIOR OFFICIALS, AND MANAGERS

11. LEGISLATORS AND SENIOR OFFICIALS 12. CORPORATE MANAGERS 13. GENERAL MANAGERS

PROFESSIONALS

21. PHYSICAL, MATHEMATICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCE 22. LIFE SCIENCE AND HEALTH PROFESSIONALS 23. TEACHING PROFESSIONALS 24. OTHER PROFESSIONALS

TECHNICIANS AND ASSOCIATED PROFESSIONALS

31. PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCE ASSOCIATE PROFESSIONALS 32. LIFE SCIENCE AND HEALTH ASSOCIATE PROFESSIONALS 33. TEACHING ASSOCIATE PROFESSIONALS 34. OTHER ASSOCIATE PROFESSIONALS

CLERKS

41. OFFICE CLERKS 42. CUSTOMER SERVICES CLERKS 43. ADMINISTRATION OF CHARITABLE OR NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS

SERVICES WORKERS AND SHOP AND MARKET SALES WORKERS

51. PERSONAL AND PROTECTIVE SERVICE WORKERS 52. MODELS, SALES PERSONS AND DEMONSTRATORS 53. TRADE, CONSUMER SERVICES

SKILLED AGRICULTURAL AND FISHERY WORKERS

61. MARKET-ORIENTED SKILLED AGRICULTURAL AND FISHERY WORKERS 62. SUBSISTENCE AGRICULTURAL AND FISHERY WORKERS

CRAFT AND RELATED TRADE WORKERS

71. EXTRACTION AND BUILDING TRADE WORKERS 72. METAL, MACHINERY AND RELATED TRADE WORKERS 73. PRECISION, HANDICRAFT, PRINTING AND RELATED TRADE WORKERS 74. OTHER CRAFT AND RELATED TRADES WORKERS

PLANT AND MACHINE OPERATORS AND ASSEMBLERS

81. STATIONARY-PLANT AND RELATED OPERATORS 82. MACHINE OPERATORS AND ASSEMBLERS 83. DRIVERS AND MOBILE-PLANT OPERATORS 84. OTHER PLANT AND MACHINE OPERATORS AND ASSEMBLERS

ELEMENTARY OCCUPATIONS

96. OTHER OR NON-CLASSIFIABLE OCCUPATIONS (NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO CLASSIFY) 98. DON'T KNOW 99. REFUSED

97. MISSING

| NOTES: B2016 | | See also notes for variable B2015. | | (1) This variable reports the spouse's Main Occupation,' that is, | the job at which the cwe spends most of the time, or if the cwe | spends an equal amount of time on two jobs, it is the one from | which the cwe earns the most money. For cwe's who are currently | employed, this variable reports their current occupation. For | cwe's who are retired or not currently working, code last | occupation. | | (2) Coding conventions shall employ the first two-digits of 1988 | ISCO / ILO International Standard Classification of Occupations | Code from the International Labor Office, CH-1211, Geneva 22, | Switzerland.

------B2017 >>> SPOUSE: SOCIO ECONOMIC STATUS ------

D17. Spouse's socio economic status......

1. WHITE COLLAR 2. WORKER 3. FARMER 4. SELF-EMPLOYED

5. [SEE VARIABLE NOTES] 6. [SEE VARIABLE NOTES]

8. DON'T KNOW 9. REFUSED

7. MISSING

| NOTES: B2017 | | The categories are intended to distinguish among the following | groups: | | 01. White collar: broad occupational grouping of workers | engaged in nonmanual labor: Managers, salaried professionals, | office workers,sales personnel, and proprietors are generally | included in the category. | | 02. Worker: broad occupational grouping of workers engaged in | manual labor. | | 03. Farmer: Normally persons self-employed in farming. | | 04. Self-employed: Self-employed occupations of all kinds, | excluding self-employed farming. Included for example | entrepreneurs, shop keeper, professionals like lawyers, medical | doctors etc.

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - NEW ZEALAND (2002): B2017 | | Response categories 1-3 were created from B2016. | | B2012 B2011 | 1. 01-42, 52, 91. | 2. 51, 71-83, 92-93. | 3. 61-62.

------B2018 >>> SPOUSE: EMPLOYMENT TYPE - PUBLIC OR PRIVATE ------

D18. Whether spouse's employment is private or public......

1. PUBLIC SECTOR 2. PRIVATE SECTOR 3. MIXED 4. "THIRD SECTOR"/NON-PROFIT SECTOR

8. DON'T KNOW 9. REFUSED

7. MISSING

------B2019 >>> SPOUSE: INDUSTRIAL SECTOR ------

D19. Industrial sector of respondent's employment......

8. DON'T KNOW 9. REFUSED

7. MISSING

------B2020 >>> HOUSEHOLD INCOME ------

D20. Household income quintile appropriate to the respondent......

1. LOWEST HOUSEHOLD INCOME QUINTILE 2. SECOND HOUSEHOLD INCOME QUINTILE 3. THIRD HOUSEHOLD INCOME QUINTILE 4. FOURTH HOUSEHOLD INCOME QUINTILE 5. HIGHEST HOUSEHOLD INCOME QUINTILE

8. DON'T KNOW 9. REFUSED

7. MISSING

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - FRANCE (2002): B2020 | | CSES Code Election Study Code/Category | 1. 2,000 or less | 2,001- 3,000 | 3,001- 5,000 | 5,001- 7,500 | 2. 7,501-10,000 | 3. 10,001-15,000 | 4. 15,001-20,000 | 5. 20,001-30,000 | 30,001-40,000 | 40,001-50,000 | 50,001 or more

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - GERMANY (2002): B2020 | | This question was asked in two stages: Those | respondents who did not identify an income level | initially were presented with income categories | from which to choose. As indicated in the table below, | both question formats were used to create the income | quintiles reported in the data (the categorical response | format is denoted 'C:'). | | CSES Code Election Study Code/Category | 1. 150-1280 | C: Less than 500 | C: 500-499 | C: 1000-1499 | 2. 1281-1850 | C: 1500-1999 | 3. 1851-2450 | C: 2000-2999 | 4. 2451-3400 | C: 3000-3999 | 5. 3401-19000 | C: 4000-4999 | C: 5000 or more

------B2021 >>> NUMBER IN HOUSEHOLD ------

D21. Exact number of persons in household - that is, the number of persons living together in the housing unit excluding paid employees and persons who pay for rent for a room......

01-90. NUMBER OF PERSONS

98. DON'T KNOW 99. REFUSED

97. MISSING

| NOTES: B2021 ------B2022 >>> NUMBER IN HOUSEHOLD UNDER AGE 18 ------

D22. Number of people in household under the age of 18......

00-90. NUMBER OF PEOPLE

98. DON'T KNOW 99. REFUSED

97. MISSING

| NOTES: B2022 | | See also notes for variable B2021.

------B2023 >>> RELIGIOUS SERVICES ATTENDANCE ------

D23. Attendance at religious services......

1. NEVER 2. ONCE A YEAR 3. TWO TO ELEVEN TIMES A YEAR 4. ONCE A MONTH 5. TWO OR MORE TIMES A MONTH 6. ONCE A WEEK

8. DON'T KNOW 9. REFUSED

7. MISSING

------B2024 >>> RELIGIOSITY ------

D24. Religiosity......

1. HAVE NO RELIGIOUS BELIEFS 2. NOT VERY RELIGIOUS 3. SOMEWHAT RELIGIOUS 4. VERY RELIGIOUS

8. DON'T KNOW 9. REFUSED

7. MISSING

| NOTES: B2024 |

------B2025 >>> RELIGIOUS DENOMINATION ------

D25. Religious denomination......

01. ROMAN CATHOLIC

PROTESTANT

02. PROTESTANT, NO DENOMINATION GIVEN 03. ADVENTIST 04. EPISCOPALIAN, ANGLICAN, CHURCH OF ENGLAND, CHURCH OF IRELAND 05. BAPTIST 06. CONGREGATIONAL 07. EUROPEAN FREE CHURCH (ANABAPTISTS) 08. HOLINESS 09. INDEPENDENT-FUNDAMENTALIST 10. LUTHERAN 11. METHODIST 12. PENTECOSTAL 13. PRESBYTERIAN

NON-TRADITIONAL PROTESTANTS

14. CHRISTIAN SCIENTISTS 15. MORMONS; LATTER DAY SAINTS 16. UNITARIAN; UNIVERSALIST 17. EASTERN ORTHODOX (GREEK RITE CATHOLIC) 18. CHRISTIAN (NO DENOMINATION GIVEN)

20. JEWISH

ISLAM 30. MUSLIM; MOHAMMEDAN; ISLAM (NO DENOMINATION GIVEN) 31. KHARIJISM 32. MU'TAZILISM 33. SUNNI 34. SHI'ISM 35. ISMA'ILIS 36. BAHA'I 37. DRUSE

BUDDHISM

40. BUDDHIST 41. THERAVADA 42. MAHAYANA 43. TANTRISM 44. TIBETAN BUDDHISM 45. SHINGON

HINDUISM AND OTHER RELIGIONS OF INDIA

50. HINDU 51. JAINISM 52. SIKHIASM 53. PARSIISM 54. VEDISM 55. BRAHMANISM 56. VAISAVISM 57. SAIVISM 58. TANTRISM 59. SHAKTISM 60. FOLK HINDUISM

INDIGENOUS RELIGIONS OF EAST ASIA

71. CONFUCIANISM 72. TAOISM 73. SHINT 74. BAHAI 75. I-KUAN-TAO

OTHERS

80. [SEE VARIABLE NOTES] 81. [SEE VARIABLE NOTES] 82. [SEE VARIABLE NOTES] 83. [SEE VARIABLE NOTES]

91. AGNOSTICS

92. ATHEISTS 93. NONE

98. DON'T KNOW 99. REFUSED

97. MISSING | ELECTION STUDY NOTES - BULGARIA (2001): B2025 | | CSES Code Election Study Code/Category | 02. Evangelist/Protestant

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - FRANCE (2002): B2025 | | CSES Code Election Study Code/Category | 80. Other

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - GERMANY (2002): B2025 | | CSES Code Election Study Code/Category | 80. Other

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - IRELAND (2002): B2025 | | CSES Code Election Study Code/Category | 80. Other

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES- POLAND (2001): B2025 | | CSES Code Election Study Code/Category | 80. Other

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - PORTUGAL (2002): B2025 | | CSES Code Election Study Code/Category | 80. Adherents to religions other than Catholicism

------B2026 >>> LANGUAGE USUALLY SPOKEN AT HOME ------

D26. This variable reports the language usually spoken in the respondents' household. If more than one language is spoken at home, this variable reports the language spoken most of the time......

001. AFRIKAANS 002. ALBANIAN, ARVANITIKA 003. ALBANIAN, GHEG 004. ALBANIAN, TOSK 005. ALLEMANNISCH 006. ALSATIAN 007. ARABIC, JUDEO-MOROCCAN 008. ARABIC, LEVANTINE (ISRAEL) 009. ARMENIAN 201. ASHANTI (GHANA) 237. ASYRIAN 010. AVAR (RUSSIA)

011. AWADHI (INDIA) 012. AYMARA, CENTRAL (ARGENTINA, PERU) 231. AZERI

013. BASQUE 234. BALKAR 014. BELORUSSIAN 015. BEMBA (ZAMBIA) 016. BENGALI, BANGLADESHI, BANGLA (INDIA) 017. BHOJPURI (INDIA) 202. BLUCH (PAKISTAN) 018. BOSNIAN 019. BRETON 020. BULGARIAN

021. CATALAN 022. CHECHEN (RUSSIA) 203. CHINESE, CANTONESE 023. CHINESE, HAKKA 024. CHINESE, MANDARIN 025. CHINESE, MIN NAN 026. CHUVASH (RUSSIA) 027. CROATIAN 028. CZECH

029. DANISH 030. DECCAN (INDIA) 204. DORIC (SCOTLAND) 031. DUTCH

032. ENGLISH 033. ERZYA (RUSSIA) 205. ESAN (NIGERIA) 034. ESTONIAN 206. EWE (GHANA) 209. FARSI (IRAN) 035. FINNISH 036. FRENCH 037. FRISIAN, WESTERN (NEATHERLAND) 038. FULACUNDA (SENEGAL)

207. GA (GHANA) 039. GAELIC, IRISH 208. GAELIC (SCOTLAND) 040. GAGAUZ (MOLDOVA) 041. GALICIAN 042. GASCON 043. GEORGIAN 044. GERMAN, STANDARD 045. GREEK 046. GUARANI, PARAGUAYAN 047. GUJARATI (SOUTH AFRICA, INDIA)

048. HEBREW 049. HUNGARIAN 051. HINDI

050. ICELANDIC 210. INDONESIAN 211. IRANIAN 052. ITALIAN 212. IWO (UGANDA)

053. JAKATI (MOLDOVA) 213. JAMAICAN PATOIS 054. JAPANESE

055. KANNADA (INDIA) 056. KAONDE (ZAMBIA) 057. KARAIM (LITHUANIA) 233. KARBADIN 058. KIRMANJKI (TURKEY) 235. KOMI 232. KURDISH 059. KURMANJI (TURKEY)

060. LADINO (ISRAEL) 061. LALA-BISA (ZAMBIA) 062. LAMBA (ZAMBIA) 063. LATVIAN 064. LENJE (ZAMBIA) 065. LESSER ANTILLEAN CREOLE 067. LIGURIAN 068. LITHUANIAN 069. LOMBARD

070. LOZI (ZAMBIA) 071. LUNDA (ZAMBIA) 072. LUVALE (ZAMBIA)

073. MACEDONIAN 074. MAITHILI (INDIA) 229. MALLORQUIN 075. MALAY 076. MALAYALAM (INDIA) 077. MALINKE (SENEGAL) 214. MALTESE 215. MENDE (SIERRA LEONE) 216. MIRPUARY/MIRPUIR (PAKISTAN) 217. MNADINGGO (GAMBIA) 078. MAMBWE-LUNGU (ZAMBIA) 079. MANDINKA (SENEGAL) 080. MAORI 081. MAPUDUNGUN (CHILE) 082. MARATHI (INDIA) 083. MBOWE (ZAMBIA) 084. MINGRELIAN (GEORGIA) 085. MONTENEGRIAN 086. MWANGA (ZAMBIA)

087. NEAPOLITAN-CALABRESE 088. NORWEGIAN

089. NSENGA (ZAMBIA) 090. NYANJA (ZAMBIA) 091. NYIHA (ZAMBIA)

092. ORIYA (INDIA) 093. OSETIN (GEORGIA)

218. PAHARI (PAKISTAN) 094. PANJABI, EASTERN (INDIA) 236. PERSIAN 095. PIEMONTESE 096. POLISH 097. PORTUGUESE 098. PROVENCAL 219. PUSHTO (PAKISTAN)

099. QUECHUA, ANCASH, HUAYLAS 100. QUECHUA, SOUTH BOLIVIAN (ARGENTINA) 101. QUECH UA, AYACUCHO 102. QUICHUA, HIGHLAND, IMBABURA

103. ROMANI, BALKAN 104. ROMANI, CARPATHIAN 105. ROMANI, VLACH 106. RUMANIAN

107. RUMANIAN, ISTRO 108. RUMANIAN, MACEDO 109. RUSSIAN

110. SARDINIAN, LOGUDORESE 220. SARAKI (PAKISTAN) 111. SCHWYZERDUTSCH (SWITZERLAND) 112. SERB 113. SERBO-CROATIAN 114. SERERE-SINE (SENEGAL) 115. SICILIAN 116. SINDHI (SINGAPRE, INDIA) 117. SLOVAK 118. SLOVENIAN 221. SOMALI 119. SOTHO, NORTHERN (SOUTH AFRICA) 120. SOTHO, SOUTHERN (SOUTH AFRICA) 121. SPANISH 222. SWAHILI 122. SWATI (SOUTH AFRICA) 123. SWEDISH

124. TAMIL (INDIA) 125. TATAR (RUSSIA) 126. TELUGU (INDIA) 127. TIBETAN 128. TICANESE (SWITZERLAND) 129. TONGA (ZAMBIA) 130. TOUCOULEUR (SENEGAL) 131. TSONGA (SOUTH AFRICA) 132. TSWANA (SOUTH AFRICA) 133. TUMBUKA (ZAMBIA) 134. TURKISH 223. TWI (GHANA)

135. UKRAINIAN 224. UGANDAN 230. UDMURT 136. URDU (INDIA)

228. VALENCIANO 225. VIETNAMESE 137. VENETIAN

138. XHOSA (SOUTH AFRICA)

139. WELSH 140. WOLOF (SENEGAL)

141. YAHUDIC (ISRAEL) 142. YIDDISH 226. YORUBA (NIGERIA)

143. ZULU

991. [SEE VARIABLE NOTES] 992. [SEE VARIABLE NOTES] 993. [SEE VARIABLE NOTES] 994. [SEE VARIABLE NOTES] 995. [SEE VARIABLE NOTES] 996. [SEE VARIABLE NOTES]

998. DON'T KNOW 999. REFUSED

997. MISSING | ELECTION STUDY NOTES - BULGARIA (2001): B2026 | | CSES Code Election Study Code/Category | 991. Wallachian

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - GERMANY (2002): B2026 | | CSES Code Election Study Code/Category | 991. Other

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - HUNGARY (2002): B2027 | | CSES Code Election Study Code/Category | 005. Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén

------B2027 >>> REGION OF RESIDENCE ------

D27. This variable reports the respondents' region of residence using coding categories not more detailed than the autonomous regions in Spain, or the Laender in Germany. Regions are usually (but not always) based upon the social, cultural, or historical differences (though some correspond to administrative regions) that manifest themselves in political cleavages......

01-80. REGION CODES [SEE VARIABLE NOTES]

97. MISSING

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - GERMANY (2002): B2027 |

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - IRELAND (2002): B2025 | | Region is not present in this election study.

------B2028 >>> RACE ------

D28. Race of respondent......

01. EUROPEAN (CAUCASOID) 02. ASIAN 03. AFRICAN (NEGROID) 04. INDIAN 05. POLYNEASIAN 06. MICRONEASIAN 07. MELANESIAN 08. AUSTRALOID 09. AMERICAN INDIAN

10. [SEE VARIABLE NOTES]

98. DON'T KNOW 99. REFUSED

97. MISSING

------B2029 >>> ETHNICITY ------

D29. This variable reports the ethnic identity of respondents......

001-996. ETHNICITY CODES [SEE VARIABLE NOTES]

998. DON'T KNOW 999. REFUSED

997. MISSING

| NOTES: B2029 | | See also notes for variable B2028.

------B2030 >>> RURAL OR URBAN RESIDENCE ------

D30. Rural/Urban Residence......

1. RURAL AREA OR VILLAGE 2. SMALL OR MIDDLE-SIZED TOWN 3. SUBURBS OF LARGE TOWN OR CITY 4. LARGE TOWN OR CITY

8. DON'T KNOW 9. REFUSED

7. MISSING

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - BULGARIA (2001): B2030 | | CSES Code Election Study Code/Category | 3. City (Administrative Center)

------B2031 >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICT ------

Q28. Primary electoral district of respondent......

00001-90000. [SEE APPENDIX II FOR CODE VALUE LABELS]

99997. MISSING

| NOTES: B2031 | | Wherever possible, this variable uses official district | identification numbers. | | In some cases, the respondents' electoral districts were | identified "indirectly," through postal codes, etc., by the | CSES staff (always with the help of the appropriate | collaborator). Where postal codes, etc., were ambiguous, cases | report missing data.

------B2032 >>> DAYS INTERVIEW CONDUCTED POST ELECTION ------

Number of days after the election interview conducted......

001-900. NUMBER OF DAYS

997. MISSING

======))) CSES MODULE 2 MICRO-LEVEL DATA: SURVEY VARIABLES ======

------B3001_1 >>> POLITICAL PARTICIPATION: PERSUADE OTHERS B3001_2 >>> POLITICAL PARTICIPATION: CAMPAIGN ACTIVITIES ------

Q1. Here is a list of things some people do during elections. Which if any did you do during the most recent election?

Q1a. ...talked to other people to persuade them to vote for a particular party or candidate?

Q1b. ....showed your support for a particular party or candidate by, for example, attending a meeting, putting up a poster, or in some other way? ......

1. YES 2. NO

8. DON'T KNOW 9. REFUSED

7. MISSING

------B3002_1 >>> HOW OFTEN DID R PERSUADE OTHERS B3002_2 >>> HOW OFTEN DID R PARTICIPATE IN CAMPAIGN ACTIVITIES ------

Q1aa. [IF YES to Q1a] How often did you do this? Would you say frequently? Occasionally? Rarely?

Q1bb. [IF YES to Q1b] How often did you do this? Would you say frequently? Occasionally? Rarely? ......

1. FREQUENTLY 2. OCCASIONALLY 3. RARELY

8. DON'T KNOW 9. REFUSED

7. MISSING

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - NEW ZEALAND (2002): B3002_1-B3002_2 | | See NOTES for B3001_1-B3001_2.

------B3003 >>> CONTACTED BY CANDIDATE OR PARTY DURING CAMPAIGN ------

Q2. During the last campaign did a candidate or anyone from a political party contact you to persuade you to vote for them? ......

1. YES 2. NO 8. DON'T KNOW 9. REFUSED

7. MISSING

------B3004_1 >>> CURRENT ELECTION: DID RESPONDENT CAST A BALLOT B3004_2 >>> CURRENT ELECTION: DID RESPONDENT CAST A BALLOT ------

Q3. Whether or not respondent cast a ballot (regardless of whether the ballot was valid)......

1. R CAST A BALLOT 5. R DID NOT CAST A BALLOT

6. [SEE VARIABLE NOTES]

8. DON'T KNOW 9. REFUSED

7. MISSING

| NOTES: B3004 | | In formulating the question used to ascertain this information, | collaborators were requested to try to ask the question in a way | that minimizes over-reporting of voter turnout where this is | known to be a problem.

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - FRANCE (2002): B3004_1 | | This variable reports turnout in the first round of the | presidential election. | | Question text: "For one reason or another, lots of people | abstain from voting in the first round of a presidential | election. Did you, personally, vote in the first round | of the presidential election, on last April 21?"

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - FRANCE (2002): B3004_2 | | This variable reports turnout in the second round of the | presidential election.

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - POLAND (2001): B3004_1 | | CSES Code Election Study Code/ Category | 6. I am not eligble

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - PORTUGAL (2002): B3004_1 | | CSES Code Election Study Code/ Category | 6. R is not eligble to vote ------B3005_1 >>> CURRENT ELECTION: VOTE CHOICE - PRESIDENT 1 B3005_2 >>> CURRENT ELECTION: VOTE CHOICE - PRESIDENT 2 ------

If applicable and respondent cast a ballot:

Q4A. This variable reports the presidential candidate or party affiliation of the presidential candidate for whom the respondent voted......

01-95. [SEE APPENDIX I FOR POLITICAL PARTIES AND PARTY BLOCKS VALUE LABELS] 96. RESPONDENT CAST INVALID BALLOT

98. DON'T KNOW 99. REFUSED

97. MISSING

| NOTES: B3005 | | See also notes for variable B3004.

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - FRANCE (2002): B3005_1 | | This variable reports vote choice in the first round of the | presidential election. |

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - FRANCE (2002): B3005_2 | | This variable reports vote choice in the second round of the | presidential election.

------B3006_1 >>> CURRENT ELECTION: VOTE CHOICE - LOWER HOUSE 1 B3006_2 >>> CURRENT ELECTION: VOTE CHOICE - LOWER HOUSE 2 ------

If applicable and respondent cast a ballot:

This variable reports the vote(s) cast by the respondent in lower house elections. See Election Study Notes for more information......

01-95. [SEE APPENDIX I FOR CODE VALUE LABELS]

96. RESPONDENT CAST INVALID BALLOT

98. DON'T KNOW 99. REFUSED

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - IRELAND (2002): B3006_1 | | This variable reports each respondent's first preference vote.

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - GERMANY (2002): B3006_1 | | This variable reports the respondents' party list ("second") | votes.

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - GERMANY (2002): B3006_2 | | This variable reports the respondents' candidate | ("first") votes.

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - HUNGARY (2002): B3006_1 | | This variable reports the respondents' party list votes.

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - HUNGARY (2002): B3006_2 | | This variable reports the respondents' district candidate | votes.

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - NEW ZEALAND (2002): B3006_1 | | This variable reports the respondents' party list votes. | These vote data are validated.

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - NEW ZEALAND (2002): B3006_2 | | This variable reports the respondents' "electorate" or | district candidate votes. These vote data are validated.

------B3007_1 >>> CURRENT ELECTION: VOTE CHOICE - UPPER HOUSE 1 B3007_2 >>> CURRENT ELECTION: VOTE CHOICE - UPPER HOUSE 2 B3007_3 >>> CURRENT ELECTION: VOTE CHOICE - UPPER HOUSE 3 B3007_4 >>> CURRENT ELECTION: VOTE CHOICE - UPPER HOUSE 4 ------

If applicable and respondent cast a ballot:

This variable reports the vote(s) cast by the respondent in UPPER house elections. See Election Study Notes for more information......

01-95. [SEE APPENDIX I FOR CODE VALUE LABELS]

96. RESPONDENT CAST INVALID BALLOT 98. DON'T KNOW 99. REFUSED

97. MISSING

| NOTES: B3007 | | See also notes for variable B3004-3006.

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - NEW ZEALAND (2002): B3007 | | These vote data are validated.

------B3008 >>> CURRENT ELECTION: DID R CAST CANDIDATE PREFERENCE VOTE ------

If applicable and respondent cast a ballot:

Q4D. For elections in which the respondent can vote for (or rank) candidates a chosen party list (i.e. where lists are "open" or flexible), this variable reports whether or not the respondent cast a preference vote......

1. R EXERCISED CANDIDATE PREFERENCE 2. R DID NOT EXERCISE CANDIDATE PREFERENCE

6. INVALID BALLOT

8. DON'T KNOW 9. REFUSED

7. MISSING

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - IRELAND (2002) : B3008 | | Under the Single Transferrable Vote (STV) rules that govern the | Irish electoral system, all voters cast a preference or | ranking-ordering over candidates. Therefore, analysts should | refer to B3004.

------B3009 >>> MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE ------

Q5. What do you think has been the most important issue facing [country] over the last [number of years that the last government was in office] years? ......

01-996. [SEE VARIABLE NOTES]

998. DON'T KNOW 999. REFUSED

997. MISSING

| NOTES: B3009 | | Collaborators have coded responses to this question and provided | the following response categories.

| 096. OTHER

------B3010 >>> GOVERNMENT PERFORMANCE: MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE ------

Q6. And thinking about that issue, how good or bad a job do you think the government/president in [capital] has done over the past [number of years between the previous and the present election OR change in govt.] years. Has it/he/she done a very good job? A good job? A bad job? A very bad job? ......

1. VERY GOOD JOB 2. GOOD JOB 3. BAD JOB 4. VERY BAD JOB

8. DON'T KNOW 9. REFUSED

7. MISSING

------B3011 >>> GOVERNMENT PERFORMANCE: GENERAL ------

Q7. Now thinking about the performance of the government in [capital]/president in general, how good or bad a job do you think the government/president in [capital] has done over the past [number of years between the previous and the present election OR change in govt.] years. Has it/he/she done a very good job? A good job? A bad job? A very bad job? ......

1. VERY GOOD JOB 2. GOOD JOB 3. BAD JOB 4. VERY BAD JOB

8. DON'T KNOW 9. REFUSED

7. MISSING

------B3012 >>> SATISFACTION WITH DEMOCRATIC PROCESS ------

Q8. On the whole, are you very satisfied, fairly satisfied, not very satisfied, or not at all satisfied with the way democracy works in [country]? ......

1. VERY SATISFIED 2. FAIRLY SATISFIED 3. NOT VERY SATISFIED 4. NOT AT ALL SATISFIED

8. DON'T KNOW 9. REFUSED

7. MISSING

------B3013 >>> WHO IS IN POWER CAN MAKE DIFFERENCE ------

Q9. Some people say it makes a difference who is in power. Others say that it doesn't make a difference who is in power. Using the scale on this card, (where ONE means that it makes a difference who is in power and FIVE means that it doesn't make a difference who is in power), where would you place yourself? ......

1. IT MAKES A DIFFERENCE WHO IS IN POWER 2. 3. 4. 5. IT DOESN'T MAKE A DIFFERENCE WHO IS IN POWER

8. DON'T KNOW 9. REFUSED

7. MISSING

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - PORTUGAL (2002): B3013 | | Question text: "Some people say it makes a difference who is in | power. Others say that it doesn't make a difference who is in | power. Using the scale on this card, (where ONE means that it | makes a big difference who is in power and FIVE means that is | doesn't make any difference who is in power), where would you | place yourself?"

------B3014 >>> WHO PEOPLE VOTE FOR MAKES A DIFFERENCE ------

Q10. Some people say that no matter who people vote for, it won't make any difference to what happens. Others say that who people vote for can make a difference to what happens. Using the scale on this card, (where ONE means that voting won't make a difference to what happens and FIVE means that voting can make a difference), where would you place yourself? ......

1. WHO PEOPLE VOTE FOR WON'T MAKE A DIFFERENCE 2. 3. 4. 5. WHO PEOPLE VOTE FOR CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE

8. DON'T KNOW 9. REFUSED

7. MISSING

| NOTES: B3014 | | ELECTION STUDY NOTES - POLAND (2001): B3014 | | The order of response categories was reversed in the Polish | questionnaire. This item was recoded for inclusion in the | merged datafiles. | ELECTION STUDY NOTES - PORTUGAL (2002): B3014 | | Question text: "Some people say that no matter who people vote | for, it won't make any difference to what happens. Others say | that who people vote for can make a difference to what happens. | Using the scale on this card, (where ONE means that voting won't | make any difference to what happens and FIVE means that voting | can make a big difference), where would you place yourself?"

------B3015 >>> DEMOCRACY BETTER THAN ANY OTHER FORM OF GOVERNMENT ------

Q11. Please tell me how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statement: "Democracy may have problems buts it's better than any other form of government." (Do you agree strongly, agree, disagree, or disagree strongly with this statement?) ......

1. AGREE STRONGLY 2. AGREE 3. DISAGREE 4. DISAGREE STRONGLY

5. [SEE VARIABLE NOTES]

8. DON'T KNOW 9. REFUSED

7. MISSING

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - NEW ZEALAND (2002): B3009 | | Respondents were provided with an additional response category, | "Neither". These responses are reported in category 5.

------B3016 >>> PREVIOUS ELECTION: DID RESPONDENT CAST A BALLOT ------

Q12. Whether or not respondent cast a ballot (regardless of whether the ballot was valid) in PRECEDING election ......

1. R CAST A BALLOT 5. R DID NOT CAST A BALLOT

6. [SEE VARIABLE NOTES]

8. DON'T KNOW 9. REFUSED

7. MISSING

| NOTES: B3016 | | In formulating the question used to ascertain this information, | collaborators were requested to try to ask the question in a way | that minimizes over-reporting of voter turnout where this is | known to be a problem.

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - POLAND (2001): B3016 | | CSES Code Election Study Code/Category | 6. I am not eligible

------B3017 >>> PREVIOUS ELECTION: VOTE CHOICE - PRESIDENT ------

If applicable and respondent cast a ballot:

Q13A. This variable reports the presidential candidate or party affiliation of the presidential candidate for whom the respondent voted......

01-95. [SEE APPENDIX I FOR POLITICAL PARTIES AND PARTY BLOCKS VALUE LABELS]

96. RESPONDENT CAST INVALID BALLOT

98. DON'T KNOW 99. REFUSED

97. MISSING

| NOTES: B3017 | | See also notes for variable B3016.

------B3018_1 >>> PREVIOUS ELECTION: VOTE CHOICE - LOWER HOUSE 1 B3018_2 >>> PREVIOUS ELECTION: VOTE CHOICE - LOWER HOUSE 2 ------

If applicable and respondent cast a ballot:

This variable reports the vote(s) cast by the respondent in LOWER house elections. See Election Study Notes for more information...... 01-95. [SEE APPENDIX I FOR CODE VALUE LABELS]

96. RESPONDENT CAST INVALID BALLOT

98. DON'T KNOW 99. REFUSED

97. MISSING

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - GERMANY (2002): B3018_1 | | This variable reports the respondents' party list ("second") | votes.

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - GERMANY (2002): B3018_2 | | This variable reports the respondents' candidate | ("first") votes.

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - HUNGARY (2002): B3018_1 | | This variable report the respondents' party list vote.

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - NEW ZEALAND (2002): B3018_1 | | This variable report the respondents' party list vote.

------B3019_1 >>> PREVIOUS ELECTION: VOTE CHOICE - UPPER HOUSE 1 B3019_2 >>> PREVIOUS ELECTION: VOTE CHOICE - UPPER HOUSE 2 B3019_3 >>> PREVIOUS ELECTION: VOTE CHOICE - UPPER HOUSE 3 ------

If applicable and respondent cast a ballot:

This variable reports the vote(s) cast by the respondent in UPPER house elections. See Election Study Notes for more information......

01-95. [SEE APPENDIX I FOR CODE VALUE LABELS]

96. RESPONDENT CAST INVALID BALLOT

98. DON'T KNOW 99. REFUSED

97. MISSING

| NOTES: B3019 | | See also notes for variable B3016-3018.

------B3020 >>> PREVIOUS ELECTION: DID R CAST CANDIDATE PREFERENCE VOTE ------

If applicable and respondent cast a ballot:

1. R EXERCISED CANDIDATE PREFERENCE 2. R DID NOT EXERCISE CANDIDATE PREF

6. INVALID BALLOT

8. DON'T KNOW 9. REFUSED

7. MISSING

------B3021 >>> PERFORMANCE OF PARTY R VOTED FOR IN PREVIOUS ELECTION ------

Q14. How well did the party you voted for then perform over the past (NUMBER OF YEARS between the previous and the current election) years? Has it done a very good job? a good job? a bad job? a very bad job? ......

1. VERY GOOD JOB 2. GOOD JOB 3. BAD JOB 4. VERY BAD JOB

5. [SEE VARIABLE NOTES]

8. DON'T KNOW 9. REFUSED

7. MISSING | ELECTION STUDY NOTES - IRELAND (2002): B3021 | | Response category code 5 includes those respondents who voted | for an independent in the previous election.

------B3022 >>> HOW WELL VOTERS' VIEWS ARE REPRESENTED IN ELECTIONS ------

Q15. Thinking about how elections in [country] work in practice, how well do elections ensure that the views of voters are represented by MPs: very well, quite well, not very well, or not well at all? ......

1. VERY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT VERY WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL

8. DON'T KNOW 9. REFUSED

7. MISSING

------B3023 >>> IS THERE A PARTY THAT REPRESENTS R'S VIEWS ------

Q16. Would you say that any of the parties in [country] represents your views reasonably well? ......

1. YES 2. NO

8. DON'T KNOW 9. REFUSED

7. MISSING

------B3024 >>> PARTY THAT REPRESENTS R'S VIEWS BEST ------

Q16a. [IF YES AT Q16] Which party represents your views best? ......

01-96. [SEE APPENDIX I FOR CODE VALUE LABELS]

98. DON'T KNOW 99. REFUSED

97. MISSING

------B3025 >>> IS THERE A LEADER THAT REPRESENTS R'S VIEWS ------

Q17. Regardless of how you feel about the parties, would you say that any of the individual party leaders/presidential candidates at the last election represents your views reasonably well? ......

1. YES 2. NO

8. DON'T KNOW 9. REFUSED

7. MISSING

------B3026 >>> LEADER THAT REPRESENTS R'S VIEWS BEST ------

Q17a. [IF YES AT Q17] Which party leader/presidential candidate represents your views best? ......

0101-9601. [SEE VARIABLE NOTES]

9998. DON'T KNOW 9999. REFUSED

9997. MISSING

| NOTES: B3026 | | FIRST TWO DIGITS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES CORRESPOND TO THE PARTY | WITH WHICH THE LEADER IS ASSOCIATED, AS REPORTED IN APPENDIX I.

------B3027 >>> QUESTIONNAIRE USED - LONG OR SHORT ------

Identifies which version, long or short, of Question 17 (Q17) was administered......

1. ADMINISTERED LONG VERSION OF Q18 2. ADMINISTERED SHORT VERSION OF Q18

| NOTES: B3027 | | The LONG version of Q18 is appropriate for those respondents who | identify a party block as the party they feel closest to. | This version of the party identification question prompts | these respondents to specify which party within the block they | identify with most. | | The SHORT version of Q18 is for those respondents who do not | identify a party block.

------B3028 >>> ARE YOU CLOSE TO ANY POLITICAL PARTY ------

Q18. Do you usually think of yourself as close to any particular political party?

......

1. YES 2. NO

8. DON'T KNOW 9. REFUSED

7. MISSING

| NOTES: B3028 | | See also notes for variables B3029_1-B3036. |

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - NEW ZEALAND (2002): B3028-B3029 | | Data for this and B3029 were collected using a single item: | | "Generally speaking, do you usually think of yourself as | National, Labour, Act, Greens, New Zealand First, or some | other, or don't you think of yourself in this way?"

------B3029_1 >>> PARTY CLOSEST TO - 1ST MENTION B3029_2 >>> PARTY CLOSEST TO - 2ND MENTION B3029_3 >>> PARTY CLOSEST TO - 3RD MENTION ------

Q18A1-3. [IF YES AT Q18] What party is that? ......

01-96. PARTY [SEE APPENDIX I FOR CODE LABELS]

98. DON'T KNOW 99. REFUSED

97. MISSING

| NOTES: B3029_1-B3029_3 | | See also notes for variables B3028 and B3030. |

| Up to three mentioned were allowed. |

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - FRANCE (2002): B3029 |

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - NEW ZEALAND (2002): B3029, B3030 | | Respondents identified at most one party.

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - POLAND (2001): B3029 | | CSES Code Election Study Code/Category | 98. Don't Know, No party mentioned

------B3030 >>> NUMBER OF PARTIES MENTIONED IN B3029 ------

Check Point: Number of parties (or blocks) mentioned in Q18A1. to Q18A3......

0. NO PARTIES MENTIONED 1. ONLY ONE BLOCK MENTIONED 3. ONLY ONE PARTY MENTIONED 5. MORE THAN ONE PARTY MENTIONED

7. MISSING

| NOTES: B3030 | | See also notes for variables B3028-B3036. |

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - NEW ZEALAND (2002): B3029, B3030, B3033 | | Respondents identified at most one party.

------B3031_1 >>> BLOCK PARTY CLOSEST TO - 1ST MENTION B3031_2 >>> BLOCK PARTY CLOSEST TO - 2ND MENTION B3031_3 >>> BLOCK PARTY CLOSEST TO - 3RD MENTION ------

Q18A1.1-3. [IF PARTY BLOCK IDENTIFIED IN Q18A1-3.] Which party in [NAME OF BLOCK] do you feel closest to? ......

01-96. [SEE APPENDIX I FOR CODE VALUE LABELS]

98. DON'T KNOW 99. REFUSED

97. MISSING

| NOTES: B3031_1-B3031_3 | | See also notes for variables B3028 and B3030. | | Response categories range from 01 to 96. Refer to Appendix I | Political Parties and Party Blocks for party block code value | labels. If no SECOND PARTY BLOCK IS VOLUNTEERED enter 99. | Users of the SHORT VERSION OF Q18 enter 00.

------B3032 >>> NUMBER OF PARTIES MENTIONED IN B2029, B3031 ------

Check Point: Number of parties mentioned in Q18......

1. NO PARTY MENTIONED OR ONLY PARTY BLOCK MENTIONED 3. ONLY ONE PARTY MENTIONED 5. MORE THAN ONE PARTY MENTIONED

7. MISSING

| NOTES: B3032 | | See also notes for variable B3028.

------B3033 >>> WHICH PARTY DO YOU FEEL CLOSEST TO ------

Q18B. [IF MORE THAN ONE PARTY IS IDENTIFIED IN Q18A] Which party do you feel closest to? ......

01-96. PARTY [SEE APPENDIX I FOR CODE LABELS]

98. DON'T KNOW 99. REFUSED

97. MISSING

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - NEW ZEALAND (2002): B3029, B3030 | | Respondents identified at most one party.

------B3034 >>> DO YOU FEEL CLOSER TO ONE PARTY ------

Q18C. [IF NO AT Q18 OR NO PARTY IDENTIFIED IN Q18A] Do you feel yourself a little closer to one of the political parties than the others? ......

1. YES 2. NO

8. DON'T KNOW 9. REFUSED

7. MISSING

| NOTES: B3034 | | See also notes for variables B3028-B3033. |

------B3035 >>> WHICH PARTY DO YOU FEEL CLOSER TO ------

Q18D. [IF YES AT Q18C.] Which party is that? ......

01-96. [CODE VALUE LABELS ARE FOUND IN APPENDIX I]

98. DON'T KNOW 99. REFUSAL

97. MISSING

| NOTES: B3035 | | See also notes for variables B3028-B3034. |

------B3036 >>> DEGREE OF CLOSENESS TO THIS PARTY ------

Q18E. Do you feel very close to this [party/party block], somewhat close, or not very close? ......

1. VERY CLOSE 2. SOMEWHAT CLOSE 3. NOT VERY CLOSE

8. DON'T KNOW 9. REFUSED

7. MISSING

| NOTES: B3036 | | See also notes for variable B3028-B3035. |

------B3037_A >>> LIKE-DISLIKE - PARTY A B3037_B >>> LIKE-DISLIKE - PARTY B B3037_C >>> LIKE-DISLIKE - PARTY C B3037_D >>> LIKE-DISLIKE - PARTY D B3037_E >>> LIKE-DISLIKE - PARTY E B3037_F >>> LIKE-DISLIKE - PARTY F B3037_G >>> LIKE-DISLIKE - ADDITIONAL - PARTY G B3037_H >>> LIKE-DISLIKE - ADDITIONAL - PARTY H B3037_I >>> LIKE-DISLIKE - ADDITIONAL - PARTY I ------Q19a-f. I'd like to know what you think about each of our political parties. After I read the name of a political party, please rate it on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 means you strongly dislike that party and 10 means that you strongly like that party. If I come to a party you haven't heard of or you feel you do not know enough about, just say so. The first party is PARTY A......

00. STRONGLY DISLIKE 01. 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. 07. 08. 09. 10. STRONGLY LIKES

96. HAVEN'T HEARD OF

98. DON'T KNOW 99. REFUSAL

97. MISSING

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - GERMANY (2002): B3037 | | Respondents were asked to place parties on a 1 to 11 scale. This | scale was recoded to fit the CSES format.

------B3038_A >>> LEFT-RIGHT - PARTY A B3038_B >>> LEFT-RIGHT - PARTY B B3038_C >>> LEFT-RIGHT - PARTY C B3038_D >>> LEFT-RIGHT - PARTY D B3038_E >>> LEFT-RIGHT - PARTY E B3038_F >>> LEFT-RIGHT - PARTY F B3038_G >>> LEFT-RIGHT - ADDITIONAL - PARTY G B3038_H >>> LEFT-RIGHT - ADDITIONAL - PARTY H B3038_I >>> LEFT-RIGHT - ADDITIONAL - PARTY I ------

Q20a. In politics people sometimes talk of left and right. Where would you place Party A on a scale from 0 to 10 where 0 means the left and 10 means the right? Q20b. Using the same scale, where would you place, PARTY B? Q20c. Using the same scale, where would you place, PARTY C? Q20d. Using the same scale, where would you place, PARTY D? Q20e. Using the same scale, where would you place, PARTY E? Q20f. Using the same scale, where would you place, PARTY F? ......

00. LEFT 01. 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. 07. 08. 09. 10. RIGHT

96. HAVEN'T HEARD OF

98. DON'T KNOW 99. REFUSAL

97. MISSING

| NOTES: B3038 | | For introductory text to this question, please reference Q20. | | See Appendix I Political Parties and Party Blocks value labels.

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - GERMANY (2002): B3038 | | Respondents were asked to place parties on a 1 to 11 scale. This | scale was recoded to fit the CSES format.

------B3039_A >>> LEFT-RIGHT - LEADER A B3039_B >>> LEFT-RIGHT - LEADER B B3039_C >>> LEFT-RIGHT - LEADER C B3039_D >>> LEFT-RIGHT - LEADER D B3039_E >>> LEFT-RIGHT - LEADER E B3039_F >>> LEFT-RIGHT - LEADER F B3039_G >>> LEFT-RIGHT - ADDITIONAL - LEADER G B3039_H >>> LEFT-RIGHT - ADDITIONAL - LEADER H B3039_I >>> LEFT-RIGHT - ADDITIONAL - LEADER I ------

Q20a. In politics people sometimes talk of left and right. Where would you place LEADER A on a scale from 0 to 10 where 0 means the left and 10 means the right? Q20b. Using the same scale, where would you place, LEADER B? Q20c. Using the same scale, where would you place, LEADER C? Q20d. Using the same scale, where would you place, LEADER D? Q20e. Using the same scale, where would you place, LEADER E? Q20f. Using the same scale, where would you place, LEADER F? ......

00. LEFT 01. 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. 07. 08. 09. 10. RIGHT

96. HAVEN'T HEARD OF

98. DON'T KNOW 99. REFUSAL

97. MISSING

| NOTES: B3039 | | For introductory text to this question, please reference Q20. | | See Appendix I Political Parties and Party Blocks value labels.

------B3040_A >>> OPTIONAL SCALE - PARTY A B3040_B >>> OPTIONAL SCALE - PARTY B B3040_C >>> OPTIONAL SCALE - PARTY C B3040_D >>> OPTIONAL SCALE - PARTY D B3040_E >>> OPTIONAL SCALE - PARTY E B3040_F >>> OPTIONAL SCALE - PARTY F B3038_G >>> OPTIONAL SCALE - ADDITIONAL - PARTY G B3038_H >>> OPTIONAL SCALE - ADDITIONAL - PARTY H B3038_I >>> OPTIONAL SCALE - ADDITIONAL - PARTY I ------

Opt-Q20a. Where would you place PARTY A on this scale? Opt-Q20b. Where would you place PARTY B on this scale? Opt-Q20c. Where would you place PARTY C on this scale? Opt-Q20d. Where would you place PARTY D on this scale? Opt-Q20e. Where would you place PARTY E on this scale? Opt-Q20f. Where would you place PARTY F on this scale? ...... 00. [SEE VARIABLE NOTES] 01. 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. 07. 08. 09. 10. [SEE VARIABLE NOTES]

96. HAVEN'T HEARD OF

98. DON'T KNOW 99. REFUSAL

97. MISSING

| NOTES: B3040 | | Variables B3040-B3041 and B3046 have been included for those | elections in which the left-right dimension is not the most | salient dimension of political competition. The following | election study notes document the scales used. | | Expert ratings of the parties on these dimensions are reported | in B5004. | | Parties are identified in Appendix I.

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - FRANCE (2002): B3040 | | Question text: "Where would you place the following political | parties on the same scale from 0 to 10, where 0 means that the | European Unification "is already too advanced" and 10 means | "that it is necessary to go even further"?

------B3041_A >>> OPTIONAL SCALE - LEADER A B3041_B >>> OPTIONAL SCALE - LEADER B B3041_C >>> OPTIONAL SCALE - LEADER C B3041_D >>> OPTIONAL SCALE - LEADER D B3041_E >>> OPTIONAL SCALE - LEADER E B3041_F >>> OPTIONAL SCALE - LEADER F ------

OPT-Q20a. Where would you place LEADER A on this scale? OPT-Q20b. Where would you place LEADER B on this scale? OPT-Q20c. Where would you place LEADER C on this scale? OPT-Q20d. Where would you place LEADER D on this scale? OPT-Q20e. Where would you place LEADER E on this scale? OPT-Q20f. Where would you place LEADER F on this scale? ...... 00. [SEE VARIABLE NOTES] 01. 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. 07. 08. 09. 10. [SEE VARIABLE NOTES]

96. HAVEN'T HEARD OF

98. DON'T KNOW 99. REFUSAL

97. MISSING

------B3042_1 >>> POLITICAL PARTICIPATION: CONTACT POLITICIAN OR OFFICIAL B3042_2 >>> POLITICAL PARTICIPATION: PROTEST OR DEMOSTRATION B3042_3 >>> POLITICAL PARTICIPATION: WORK WITH OTHERS WHO SHARE CONCERNS ------

Q21. Over the past five years or so, have you done any of the following things to express your views about something the government should or should not be doing?

Q21a. contacted a politician or government official either in person, or in writing, or some other way?

Q21b. taken part in a protest, march or demonstration?

Q21c. worked together with people who shared the same concern? ......

1. YES 2. NO

8. DON'T KNOW 9. REFUSAL

7. MISSING

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - NEW ZEALAND (2002): B3042 | | Question text: "There are various forms of political action | that people take to express their views about something the | government should or should not be doing. For each one, have | you actually done it during the | | CSES Code Election Study Code/Category | 01. During the last five years | 02. More than five years ago |

------B3043 >>> RESPECT FOR INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM AND HUMAN RIGHTS ------

Q22. How much respect is there for individual freedom and human rights nowadays in (country)? Do you feel there is a lot of respect for individual freedom, some respect, not much respect, or no respect at all? ......

1. A LOT OF RESPECT FOR INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM 2. SOME RESPECT 3. NOT MUCH RESPECT 4. NO RESPECT AT ALL

8. DON'T KNOW 9. REFUSAL

7. MISSING

------B3044 >>> HOW WIDESPREAD IS CORRUPTION ------

Q23. How widespread do you think corruption such as bribe taking is amongst politicians in [country]: very widespread, quite widespread, not very widespread, it hardly happens at all? ......

1. VERY WIDESPREAD 2. QUITE WIDESPREAD 3. NOT VERY WIDESPREAD 4. IT HARDLY HAPPENS AT ALL

8. DON'T KNOW 9. REFUSAL

7. MISSING

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - HUNGARY (2002): B3044 | | This question was asked in a different block than the rest of | the CSES Module. In the original Hungarian questionnaire, | the CSES module was asked as questions 22 to 51, while this | particular items only as question 64.

------B3045 >>> LEFT-RIGHT - SELF ------

Q24. In politics people sometimes talk of left and right. Where would you place yourself on a scale from 0 to 10 where 0 means the left and 10 means the right? ......

00. LEFT 01. 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. 07. 08. 09. 10. RIGHT

98. DON'T KNOW 99. REFUSAL

97. MISSING

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - GERMANY (2002): B3045 | | Respondents were asked to place parties on a 1-11 scale. This | scale was recoded to fit the CSES format.

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - HUNGARY (2002): B3045 | | This question on left-right self-placement (question number | 24 in the CSES module) was inserted before the battery | on the left-right placement of the parties (question 20 of the | CSES module).

------B3046 >>> OPTIONAL SCALE - SELF ------

OPT-Q24. Where would you place yourself on this scale? ......

00. [SEE VARIABLE NOTES] 01. 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. 07. 08. 09. 10. [SEE VARIABLE NOTES]

98. DON'T KNOW 99. REFUSAL

97. MISSING

| NOTES: B3046 | | See also notes for B3040, B3041.

------B3047_1 >>> POLITICAL INFORMATION ITEM - 1ST B3047_2 >>> POLITICAL INFORMATION ITEM - 2ND B3047_3 >>> POLITICAL INFORMATION ITEM - 3RD ------

Q25.- Q27. Political information items......

1. CORRECT 2. INCORRECT

8. DON'T KNOW 9. REFUSED

7. MISSING

| NOTES: B3047 | | Some studies include a series of political information | items, designed to test the respondents' general knowledge. | These items are of varying difficulty and responses are simply | reported as correct or incorrect. The questions used, and their | correct answers, are reported below. |

| The response category "Don't Know" was not included in all | studies.

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - FRANCE (2002): B3047 | | Question text (B3047_1): "Laurent Fabius is a member of the | Socialist Party." (True) | | Question text (B3047_2): "Michelle Alliot Marie is the president | of RPR." (True) | | Question text (B3047_3): "The deputies are elected by | proportional representation." (False)

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - HUNGARY (2002): B3047 | | Question text (B3047_1): "Plese select the ones you are familiar | with and tell me which of these would you like to see playing an | important part in politics in the next years? [Respondents were | presented with a list of prominent politicians. This item was | coded as a "correct" answer if the respondent rated - | positively or negatively - at least 27 out of the 41 politicians | listed on the cards.] | | Question text (B3047_2): "Do you know what percentage of the | list votes a party must get in order to be sure have some | of its candidates sent to the new Parliament?" [CORRECT ANSWER: | FIVE PERCENT] | | Question text (B3047_3): "Do you know who is the presiding | judge of the Constitutional Court?" [CORRECT ANSWER: JÁNOS | NÉMETH]

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - IRELAND (2002): B3047 | | Question text (B3047_1): "Can you tell me who was the leader of | the Fianna Fail during the most recent general election | campaign?" | | Question text (B3047_2): "The Green party recently elected a | leader for the first time. Could you tell me who it is?" | | Question text (B3047_3): "Who is Ireland's European | Commissioner?"

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - NEW ZEALAND (2002): B3047 | | Question text (B3047_1): "Now, here is a quick quiz on New | Zealand government. For each of the following statements, please | say whether it is true or false. If you don't know the answer, | put a tick under ‘don't know' and try the next. Enrolling as a | voter in New Zealand is compulsory." | | Question text (B3047_2): "Here are some other statements about | MMP. Do you think they are true, or false? The party with the | most votes is more likely to get the most seats under MMP than | under first past the post." | | Question text (B3047_3): "Only some of the parties in parliament | form a government, made up of a Prime Minister and Cabinet | Ministers. Can you recall which party or parties formed the | government after the 1999 election?"

======))) CSES MODULE 2 DISTRICT-LEVEL VARIABLES ======

| NOTES: | | (1) All variables in this section pertain the first segment of | the lower house of the legislative body. Later versions of the | project will include electoral returns for upper house and head | of state elections, wherever possible. In elections in which | the lower house was not elected, no data are reported here. | | (2) The respondents' electoral district is reported in B2027, | with labels listed in Appendix II.

------B4001 >>> NUMBER OF SEATS IN DISTRICT ------

This variable reports the number of seats contested in each district of the first segment of the lower house of the legislature......

001-900. NUMBER OF SEATS CONTESTED IN ELECTORAL DISTRICT

997. MISSING

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - BULGARIA (2001): B4001-4005 | | See ELECTION STUDY NOTES for B2031. Missing data codes are | reported in those cases in which more than one electoral | district is included in one electoral district category.

------B4002 >>> NUMBER OF CANDIDATES IN DISTRICT ------

This variable reports the number of candidates who contested seats in each district. These data are reported for systems in which electors vote for candidates directly, and for systems in which electors may cast a preference ballot (i.e. indicate a candidate from a party list, in addition to casting a ballot for a party list)......

0001-9000. NUMBER OF CANDIDATES THAT CONTESTED THE ELECTION IN THIS ELECTORAL DISTRICT

9997. MISSING

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - GERMANY (2002): B4004 | | These data report the number of candidates competing for | district seats ("first" ballots).

------B4003 >>> NUMBER OF PARTY LISTS IN DISTRICT ------

This variable reports the number of parties that presented lists and thereby contested seats in the district. These data are reported for those systems in which electors cast ballots for party lists......

001-900. NUMBER OF PARTIES THAT PRESENTED A LIST OF CANDIDATES IN THE ELECTION IN THIS ELECTORAL DISTRICT

997. MISSING

------B4004_A >>> PERCENT VOTE IN DISTRICT - PARTY A B4004_B >>> PERCENT VOTE IN DISTRICT - PARTY B B4004_C >>> PERCENT VOTE IN DISTRICT - PARTY C B4004_D >>> PERCENT VOTE IN DISTRICT - PARTY D B4004_E >>> PERCENT VOTE IN DISTRICT - PARTY E B4004_F >>> PERCENT VOTE IN DISTRICT - PARTY F ------

This variable reports the proportion of votes cast in favor of party [A/B/C/D/E/F] in this district. In majoritarian systems, in which more than one round of elections are held, this variable reports the proportion of the popular vote cast in favor of party [A/B/C/D/E/F] in the FIRST round......

001.00-100.00. PERCENT (1.00% TO 100.00%) OF THE VALID BALLOTS CAST IN THIS DISTRICT THAT WERE CAST IN FAVOR OF PARTY [A/B/C/D/E/F].

997.00. MISSING

| NOTES: B4004 | | Parties are identified in Appendix I.

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - GERMANY (2002): B4004 | | These data report vote shares for district candidates ("first" | ballots).

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - IRELAND (2002): B4004 | | These data report first preference vote shares.

------B4005 >>> TURNOUT IN DISTRICT ------

This variable reports the proportion of valid votes cast relative to the number of voters......

001.00-100.00. PERCENT OF VOTERS IN THIS DISTRICT THAT CAST VALID BALLOTS

997.00. MISSING

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - IRELAND (2002): B4005 | | These data report the ratio of total ballots cast to | electorate.

======))) CSES MODULE 2 MACRO-LEVEL VARIABLES ======

------B5001_A >>> PERCENT VOTE - LOWER HOUSE - PARTY A B5001_B >>> PERCENT VOTE - LOWER HOUSE - PARTY B B5001_C >>> PERCENT VOTE - LOWER HOUSE - PARTY C B5001_D >>> PERCENT VOTE - LOWER HOUSE - PARTY D B5001_E >>> PERCENT VOTE - LOWER HOUSE - PARTY E B5001_F >>> PERCENT VOTE - LOWER HOUSE - PARTY F ------

Percent of popular vote received by PARTY [A/B/C/D/E/F] in current (lower house) legislative election: ......

000.00-100.00. PERCENT OF THE POPULAR VOTE THAT PARTY [A/B/C/D/E/F] RECEIVED

996.00. ALLIANCE MEMBER (NO INDIVIDUAL TALLY)

997.00. MISSING

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - GERMANY (2002): B5001 | | These data report the share each party won in the second segment | (list, or "second" votes) in the lower house.

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - HUNGARY (2002): B5001 | | These data report the share each party won in the second segment | (territorial lists) in the lower house.

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - NEW ZEALAND (2002): B5001 | | These data report the share each party won in the second segment | (party votes) in the lower house.

------B5002_A >>> PERCENT SEATS - LOWER HOUSE - PARTY A B5002_B >>> PERCENT SEATS - LOWER HOUSE - PARTY B B5002_C >>> PERCENT SEATS - LOWER HOUSE - PARTY C B5002_D >>> PERCENT SEATS - LOWER HOUSE - PARTY D B5002_E >>> PERCENT SEATS - LOWER HOUSE - PARTY E B5002_F >>> PERCENT SEATS - LOWER HOUSE - PARTY F ------

Percent of seats in lower house received by PARTY A in current (lower house) election: ......

000.00-100.00. PERCENT OF THE SEATS THAT PARTY [A/B/C/D/E/F] RECEIVED

996.00. ALLIANCE MEMBER (NO INDIVIDUAL TALLY)

997.00. MISSING

| NOTES: B5007 | | Parties are identified in Appendix I.

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - GERMANY (2002): B5002 | | These data report the total number of seats allocated to | each party after the election, resulting from both | party list and candidate votes.

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - HUNGARY (2002): B5002 | | These data report the total number of seats allocated to | each party after the election, resulting from both | party list and candidate votes.

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - NEW ZEALAND (2002): B5002 | | These data report the total number of seats allocated to | each party after the election, resulting from both | party list and candidate votes.

------B5003_A >>> PERCENT VOTE - UPPER HOUSE - PARTY A B5003_B >>> PERCENT VOTE - UPPER HOUSE - PARTY B B5003_C >>> PERCENT VOTE - UPPER HOUSE - PARTY C B5003_D >>> PERCENT VOTE - UPPER HOUSE - PARTY D B5003_E >>> PERCENT VOTE - UPPER HOUSE - PARTY E B5003_F >>> PERCENT VOTE - UPPER HOUSE - PARTY F ------

Percent of popular vote received by PARTY [A/B/C/D/E/F] in current (upper house) legislative election: ......

000.00-100.00. PERCENT OF THE POPULAR VOTE THAT PARTY [A/B/C/D/E/F] RECEIVED

996.00. ALLIANCE MEMBER (NO INDIVIDUAL TALLY)

997.00. MISSING

| NOTES: B5008 | | Parties are identified in Appendix I.

------B5004_A >>> PERCENT SEATS - UPPER HOUSE - PARTY A B5004_B >>> PERCENT SEATS - UPPER HOUSE - PARTY B B5004_C >>> PERCENT SEATS - UPPER HOUSE - PARTY C B5004_D >>> PERCENT SEATS - UPPER HOUSE - PARTY D B5004_E >>> PERCENT SEATS - UPPER HOUSE - PARTY E B5004_F >>> PERCENT SEATS - UPPER HOUSE - PARTY F ------

Percent of seats in upper house received by PARTY [A/B/C/D/E/F] in current (upper house) election: ......

000.00-100.00. PERCENT OF THE SEATS THAT PARTY [A/B/C/D/E/F] RECEIVED

996.00. ALLIANCE MEMBER (NO INDIVIDUAL TALLY)

997.00. MISSING

| NOTES: B5009 | | Parties are identified in Appendix I.

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - POLAND (2001): B5004 | | The Senate Block 2001 was an electoral alliance of the | Citizen's Platform, Law and Justice, Freedom Union and | other parties.

------B5005_A >>> PERCENT VOTE - PRESIDENT - PARTY A B5005_B >>> PERCENT VOTE - PRESIDENT - PARTY B B5005_C >>> PERCENT VOTE - PRESIDENT - PARTY C B5005_D >>> PERCENT VOTE - PRESIDENT - PARTY D B5005_E >>> PERCENT VOTE - PRESIDENT - PARTY E B5005_F >>> PERCENT VOTE - PRESIDENT - PARTY F ------

If multiple rounds, percent of vote received in first round......

000.00-100.00 PERCENT OF THE POPULAR VOTE THAT PARTY [A/B/C/D/E/F] RECEIVED

996.00. ALLIANCE MEMBER (NO INDIVIDUAL TALLY)

997.00. MISSING

| NOTES: B5010 | | Parties A-F are identified in Appendix I.

| ELECTION STUDY NOTES - FRANCE (2002): B5005 | | These data report first round vote shares.

//END OF FILE======

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS (CSES) - MODULE 2 (2001-2006)

CODEBOOK: APPENDIX I - PARTIES

ADVANCE RELEASE DATASET: MAY 1, 2003

CSES Secretariat Center for Political Studies Institute for Social Research The University of Michigan

======

These materials are based on work supported by the National Science Foundation (www.nsf.gov) under grant number CES-0112029 and the Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.

Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in these materials are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the funding agencies.

IMPORTANT NOTE REGARDING ADVANCE RELEASES:

This dataset and all accompanying documentation is an "Advance Release" of CSES Module 2 (2001-2006).

We hope that until such time as the Full Release of CSES Module 2 is available, users will find this and future CSES Module 2 Advance Release files to be helpful in their work.

======

======TABLE OF CONTENTS ======

))) APPENDIX I - PARTIES

>>> PARTIES: BULGARIA (2001) >>> PARTIES: FRANCE (2002) >>> PARTIES: GERMANY (2002) >>> PARTIES: HUNGARY (2002) >>> PARTIES: IRELAND (2002) >>> PARTIES: NEW ZEALAND (2002) >>> PARTIES: POLAND (2001) >>> PARTIES: PORTUGAL (2002)

======))) APPENDIX I - PARTIES ======

| NOTES: PARTIES | | THIS APPENDIX IDENTIFIES PARTIES ACTIVE DURING A POLITY'S | ELECTION. | | PROVIDED ARE THE PARTY LABELS FOR THE CODES USED IN MICRO | DATA VARIABLES. PARTIES A THROUGH F ARE THE SIX MOST | POPULAR PARTIES, LISTED IN DESCENDING ORDER ACCORDING | TO THEIR SHARE OF THE POPULAR VOTE IN THE "LOWEST" LEVEL | ELECTION HELD (I.E. WHEREVER POSSIBLE, THE FIRST SEGMENT | OF THE LOWER HOUSE). | | PARTIES G, H, AND I ARE SUPPLEMENTAL PARTIES VOLUNTARILY | PROVIDED BY SOME ELECTION STUDIES. HOWEVER, THESE ARE IN | NO PARTICULAR ORDER. |

------>>> PARTIES: BULGARIA (2001) ------

01. COALITION FOR BULGARIA 02. PARTY B UNITED DEMOCRATIC FORCES 03. PARTY D COALITION: MOVEMENT FOR RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS, LIBERAL UNION, AND EURORAMA 04. PARTY F EUROLEFT 05. THE BLOCK OF G. GANCHEV 07. BULGARIAN AGRICULTURAL NATIONAL FORCES-UNITED 08. BULGARIAN COMMUNIST PARTY 09. BULGARIAN SOCIAL DEMOCRATIC PARTY 10. FATHERLAND PARTY OF LABOUR 15. PARTY E MOVEMENT 'GEORGIEVDEN' 17. CHRISTIAN SOCIAL UNION 19. BULGARIAN AGRICULTURAL NATIONAL FORCES, A. MAUSER, NATIONAL UNION 21. GREEN PARTY 24. COALITION UNITED AGRICULTURAL FORCES 25. OTHER G INNER MACEDONIAN REVOLUTIONARY ORGANIZATION 30. NATIONAL UNION 50. BULGARIAN AGRICULTURAL NATIONAL FORCES- 'N. PETKOV' 52. BULGARIAN AGRICULTURAL NATIONAL FORCES- 'AL. STAMBOLISKI' 57. EURORAMA 63. PARTY A NATIONAL MOVEMENT SIMEON THE SECOND 66. COALITION: GEORGIEVDEN, INNER MACEDONIAN REVOLUTIONARY ORGANIZATION 70. NATIONAL UNION, FATHERLAND LEFT 81. COALITION: BULGARIAN SOCIAL DEMOCRATIC PARTY, DEMOCRATIC LEFT 82. UNION FOR NATIONAL SALVATION 83. EUROLEFT 84. BULGARIAN BUSINESS BLOCK 85. DEMOCRATIC ALTERNATIVE FOR THE REPUBLIC 86. PARTY C BULGARIAN SOCIALIST PARTY 87. UNION BULGARIA 95. OTHER

------>>> PARTIES: FRANCE (2002) ------

01. NATIONAL REPUBLICAN MOVEMENT LEADER B. MEGRET MOUVEMENT NATIONAL RÉPUBLICAIN 02. PARTY B NATIONAL FRONT LEADER B J. LE PEN FRONT NATIONAL 03. MOVEMENT FOR FRANCE LEADER P. DE VILLIERS LE MOUVEMENT POUR LA FRANCE 04. RALLY FOR FRANCE LEADER C. PASQUA LE RASSEMBLEMENT POUR LA FRANCE 05. PARTY A RALLY FOR THE REPUBLIC LEADER A J. CHIRAC RASSEMBLEMENT POUR LA RÉPUBLIQUE 06. OTHER H LIBERAL DEMOCRACY LEADER H A. MADELIN DÉMOCRATIE LIBÉRALE 07. PARTY D UNION FOR FRENCH DEMOCRACY LEADER D F. BAYROU UNION POUR LA DÉMOCRATIE FRANÇAISE 08. HUNTING, FISHING, NATURE LEADER J. SAINT-JOSSE AND TRADITION CHASSE, PÊCHE, NATURE ET TRADITION 09. OTHER G GREENS LEADER G N. MAMERE LES VERTS 10. OTHER ECOLOGICAL PARTIES UN AUTRE MOUVEMENT ÉCOLOGISTE 11. LEFT RADICAL PARTY LEADER C. TAUBIRA PARTI RADICAL DE GAUCHE 12. PARTY F REPUBLICAN AND CIVIC MOVEMENT LEADER F J. CHEVENMENT MOUVEMENT DES CITOYENS / PÔLE RÉPUBLICAIN 13. PARTY C SOCIALIST PARTY LEADER C L. JOSPIN PARTI SOCIALISTE 14. OTHER I FRENCH COMMUNIST PARTY LEADER I R. HUE PARTI COMMUNISTE FRANÇAIS 15. REVOLUTIONARY COMMUNIST LEAGUE LEADER O. BECANCENOT LIGUE COMMUNISTE RÉVOLUTIONNAIRE 16. PARTY E WORKERS' STRUGGLE LEADER E A. LAGUILLER LUTTE OUVRIÈRE 17. WORKERS' PARTY LEADER D. GLUCKSTEIN PARTI DES TRAVAILLEURS 18. FORUM OF SOCIAL REPUBLICANS LEADER C. BOUTIN FORUM DES RÉPUBLICAINS SOCIAUX 19. CITIZENSHIP ACTION LEADER C. LEPAGE PARTICIPATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY MOUVEMENT CAP 21

------>>> PARTIES: GERMANY (2002) ------

01. PARTY A SOCIAL DEMOCRATIC PARTY 02. PARTY B CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC UNION 03. PARTY C CHRISTIAN SOCIAL UNION 04. PARTY D ALLIANCE 90/GREENS 05. PARTY E FREE DEMOCRATIC PARTY 06. PARTY F PARTY OF DEMOCRATIC SOCIALISM 07. OTHER G THE REPUBLICANS 08. OTHER H PARTY OF THE RULE OF LAW OFFENSIVE 10. GERMAN PEOPLE'S UNION 11. NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF GERMANY 12. ECOLOGICAL DEMOCRATIC PARTY 13. THE GREYS 79. OTHER

| NOTE: The CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC UNION does not contest seats | in Bavaria, rather forms an electoral block with her "sister" | party, CHRISTIAN SOCIAL UNION, which only contests seats in | Bavaria.

------>>> PARTIES: HUNGARY (2002) ------

01. PARTY E ALLIANCE FOR HUNGARY - CENTER PARTY 02. PARTY B FIDESZ - HUNGARIAN CIVIC PARTY 03. PARTY F HUNGARIAN DEMOCRATIC FORUM 04. PARTY D HUNGARIAN JUSTICE AND LIFE PARTY 05. PARTY A HUNGARIAN SOCIALIST PARTY 06. PARTY C ALLIANCE OF FREE DEMOCRATS 07. WORKERS PARTY 08. INDEPENDENT SMALL HOLDERS PARTY 09. OTHERS 10. COALITION: FIDESZ - HUNGARIAN CIVIC PARTY & HUNGARIAN DEMOCRATIC FORUM

------>>> PARTIES: IRELAND (2002) ------

01. PARTY A FIANNA FAIL 02. PARTY B FINE GAEL 03. PARTY F GREEN 04. PARTY C LABOUR 05. PARTY E PROGRESSIVE DEMOCRATS 06. PARTY D SINN FEIN 07. INDEPENDENTS 12. OTHERS

------>>> PARTIES: NEW ZEALAND (2002) ------

01. PARTY A LABOUR 02. PARTY B NATIONAL 03. PARTY C NEW ZEALAND FIRST 04. PARTY D ACT NEW ZEALAND 05. PARTY E GREEN PARTY 06. PARTY F UNITED FUTURE 07. OTHER G JIM ANDERTON'S PROGRESSIVE COALITION 08. OTHER H ALLIANCE 09. CHRISTIAN HERITAGE 10. AOTEAROA LEGALISE CANNABIS PARTY 11. OTHER 12. MANA MAORI MOVEMENT 13. OUTDOOR RECREATION NEW ZEALAND 14. INDEPENDENT 15. LIBERTARIAN 16. ONE NATION 17. MANA MOTUHAKE 18. DEMOCRAT 19. FUTURE NZ 20. LIBERAL 21. BLOKES' LIBERTARIAN

------>>> PARTIES: POLAND (2001) ------

01. PARTY A COALITION OF THE ALLIANCE OF THE DEMOCRATIC LEFT AND THE UNION OF LABOR 02. OTHER G COALITION ELECTORAL ACTION SOLIDARITY OF THE RIGHT 03. OTHER H FREEDOM UNION 04. PARTY C SELF DEFENCE OF THE POLISH REPUBLIC 05. PARTY D LAW AND JUSTICE 06. PARTY E POLISH PEOPLE'S PARTY 07. PARTY B CITIZEN'S PLATFORM 08. ALTERNATIVE SOCIAL MOVEMENT 10. PARTY F LEAGUE OF POLISH FAMILIES 11. GERMAN MINORITY 13. POLISH ECONOMIC UNION 14. POLISH SOCIALIST PARTY 15. GERMAN MINORITY OF UPPER SILESIA 20. BLOK SENAT 2001 21. RYSZARD MATUSIAK 22. TADUESZ DABROWSKI 23. "KLUB SLUZBY NIEPODLEGLSOCI- OKREGU WYBORCZEGO NR 10" 24. NIEZALEZNY POZAPARTYJNY KOMITET WYBORCZY WYBORCOW 25. OPOLSKI KOMITET OBYWATELSKI 26. SYMPATYKOW LECHA KACZYNSKIEGO 27. HENRYK TADEUSZ STOKLOSA 28. CITIZEN'S FORUM(FO)-CHRISTIAN DEMOCRACY 30. LABOR UNION 31. NATIONAL CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC BLOCK FOR POLAND 32. NATIONAL ALLIANCE OF RETIRED OF THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND 33. COALITION ELECTORAL SOLIDARITY 34. ALLIANCE OF THE DEMOCRATIC LEFT 35. UNION OF THE REOUBLIC'S RIGHTISTS 36. MOVEMENT FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF POLAND 37. NATIONAL PENSIONER'S PARTY 38. "POROZUMIENIE PRAWICY POLSKIEJ" 39. GERMAN SOCIAL AND CULTURAL ASSOCIATION OF OPOLE SILESIA 40. POLISH NATIONAL COMMONWEALTH-POLISH NATIONAL PARTY 41. GERMAN MINORITY - PRAWOSLAWNI SLAVIC ETHNIC ASSOCIATION -'ORTHODOX BELIEVERS' 42. RECONCILIATION AND THE FUTURE 43. GERMAN MINORITY ASSOCIATION IN OLSZTYN 44. GERMAN MINORITY ASSOCIATION IN OPOLE SILESIA 45. PEOPLE'S ALLIANCE -'POLAND LABOUR JUSTICE' 50. SOCIAL MOVEMENT-SOLIDARITY ELECTORAL ACTION 51. CHRISTIAN NATIONAL UNION 52. POLISH PARTY OF CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATS 53. REALPOLITIK UNION 54. POLISH NATIONAL PARTY 55. POLISH "ROBOTNICZO" PARTY- CHLOPSKA 56. SOLIDARITY (WITHOUT IDENTIFYING MORE SPECIFIC PARTY) 57. CONSERVATIVE PEASENT PARTY 58. NATIONAL CATHOLIC MOVEMENT (RK-N) 59. POLISH UNDERSTANDING 60. CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF THE THIRD REPUBLIC 61. CONFEDERATION FOR INDEPENDENT POLAND 95. INDEPENDENT AND NON-PARTISAN 96. OTHER PARTY

------>>> PARTIES: PORTUGAL (2002) ------

01. PARTY A SOCIAL DEMOCRATIC PARTY PARTIDO SOCIAL DEMOCRATA 02. PARTY B SOCIALIST PARTY PARTIDO SOCIALISTA 03. PARTY C POPULAR PARTY PARTIDO POPULAR 04. PARTY D UNITARY DEMOCRATIC COALITION COLIGAÇÃO DEMOCRÁTICA UNITÁRIA 05. PARTY E LEFT BLOCK BLOCO DE ESQUERDA 06. PARTY F PORTUGUESE COMMUNIST WORKERS' PARTY PARTIDO COMUNISTA DOS TRABALHADORES PORTUGUESES / MOVIMENTO REORGANIZATIVO DO PROLETARIADO PORTUGUÊS 07. POPULAR MONARCHIST PARTY PARTIDO POPULAR MONARQUICO 08. HUMANIST PARTY PARTIDO HUMANISTA 09. COMMUNIST PARTY PARTIDO COMUNISTA PORTUGUÊS 10. GREEN PARTY PARTIDO ECOLOGISTA- OS VERDES 11. POPULAR DEMOCRATIC UNION UNIÃO DEMOCRÁTICA POPULAR 12. REVOLUTIONARY SOCIALIST PARTY PARTIDO SOCIALISTA REVOLUCIONÁRIO 13. POLITICS XXI POLÍTICA XXI 14. OTHER 15. SPOILED BALLOT

//END OF FILE

======

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS - MODULE 2 (2001-2006) MICRO-QUESTIONNAIRE - January 8, 2003-

CSES Secretariat Center for Political Studies Institute for Social Research The University of Michigan

======

INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE ADMINSTRATION OF THE CSES QUESIONNAIRE:

(1) The CSES module is intended to be administered in its entirety as a single, uninterrupted block of questions. In most cases, the CSES module is included as part of a larger study. For reliable comparisons to be made, it is important that any additional items investigators may wish to include do not interrupt the CSES module.

(2) The CSES module should be administered as a post-election interview.

(3) Where the CSES module is included in a larger study, and to ensure that question-ordering effects are minimized, the CSES module should be administered at the beginning of the survey instrument. Where this is not possible, collaborators should be sensitive to the effects questions asked immediately prior to the module may have.

(4) NOTES often precede the question TEXT, and provide instructions for the administration of the item. Where no question TEXT is provided, collaborators should provide documentation of the question used.

(5) The response options that should be read to the respondent are contained in the body of the question.

(6) Where words appear in brackets [ ] collaborators shall select the words that are most appropriate for use in their polity. Phrases that appear in parentheses ( ) contain words that are optional -- that collaborators (or their interviewers) can decide to read or not read to respondents as needed.

(7) Several of the items in the CSES Module follow skip patterns that are noted by braces < >. When a question is inappropriate for a particular respondent because of the skip pattern, code the response 'MISSING'.

(8) Respondents who volunteer the response "Don't know" (or who refuse to answer a question) should be coded appropriately. Interviewers should accept a this response and should not probe for additional information or force a respondent to use one of the response categories provided in the text of the question.

(9) Showcards may be helpful for the administration of some of the questions. The CSES Secretariat has prepared some, and made them available on its web site. The questions to which these apply are noted below.

======))) CSES MODULE 2 MICRO-LEVEL DATA: ADMINISTRATIVE VARIABLES ======

------Q0A. >>> ID COMPONENT - RESPONDENT WITHIN ELECTION STUDY ------

NOTE: This item should provide a unique, numeric identification code for each respondent in the study......

------Q0B. >>> INTERVIEWER WITHIN ELECTION STUDY ------

NOTE: This item should provide a unique, numeric identification code for each interviewer who administered the survey......

------Q0C. >>> INTERVIEWER GENDER ------

NOTE: This item should indicate the interviewer's gender......

1. MALE 2. FEMALE

9. MISSING

------Q0D. >>> DATE QUESTIONNAIRE ADMINISTERED - MONTH >>> DATE QUESTIONNAIRE ADMINISTERED - DAY >>> DATE QUESTIONNAIRE ADMINISTERED - YEAR ------

NOTE: This item should indicate the date on which the post-election interview took place......

MONTH

01. JANUARY 02. FEBRUARY 03. MARCH 04. APRIL 05. MAY 06. JUNE 07. JULY 08. AUGUST 09. SEPTEMBER 10. OCTOBER 11. NOVEMBER 12. DECEMBER

99. MISSING

DAY

01-31. DAY OF MONTH

99. MISSING

YEAR

1996-2002. YEAR

9999. MISSING

======))) CSES MODULE 2 MICRO-LEVEL DATA: SURVEY ITEMS ======

------Q1A. >>> POLITICAL PARTICIPATION: PERSUADE OTHERS ------

TEXT: Here is a list of things some people do during elections. Which if any did you do during the most recent election?

(Did you) talk to other people to persuade them to vote for a particular party or candidate? ......

1. YES --> GO TO Q1AA. 2. NO --> GO TO Q1B.

8. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 9. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

7. MISSING

------Q1AA. >>> HOW OFTEN DID R PERSUADE OTHERS ------

TEXT: How often did you do this? Would you say frequently? Occasionally? Rarely? ......

1. FREQUENTLY 2. OCCASIONALLY 3. RARELY

8. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 9. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

7. MISSING

------Q1B. >>> POLITICAL PARTICIPATION: CAMPAIGN ACTIVITIES ------

TEXT: Here is a list of things some people do during elections. Which if any did you do during the most recent election?

(Did you) show your support for a particular party or candidate by, for example, attending a meeting, putting up a poster, or in some other way? ......

1. YES --> GO TO Q1BB. 2. NO --> GO TO Q2.

8. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 9. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

7. MISSING

------Q1BB. >>> HOW OFTEN DID R PARTICIPATE IN CAMPAIGN ACTIVITIES ------

TEXT: How often did you do this? Would you say frequently? Occasionally? Rarely? ......

1. FREQUENTLY 2. OCCASIONALLY 3. RARELY

8. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 9. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

7. MISSING

------Q2. >>> CONTACTED BY CANDIDATE OR PARTY DURING CAMPAIGN ------

TEXT: During the last campaign did a candidate or anyone from a political party contact you to persuade you to vote for them? ......

1. YES 2. NO

8. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 9. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

7. MISSING

------Q3. >>> CURRENT ELECTION: DID RESPONDENT CAST A BALLOT ------

NOTE: This item should ascertain whether or not the respondent cast a ballot, regardless of whether or not it was valid......

1. R CAST A BALLOT -> GO TO Q4 5. R DID NOT CAST A BALLOT -> GO TO Q5

8. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 9. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

7. MISSING

------Q4A. >>> CURRENT ELECTION: VOTE CHOICE - PRESIDENT ------

NOTES: (1) The following vote choices should be reported, where appropriate:

Q4A. Presidential candid ate/ party choice Q4B. Legislative election: party list Q4C. Legislative election: candidate (or candidate preference)

(2) In elections in which more than one institution is elected on the same day (e.g. president and legislature; upper & lower house) using different votes, please ensure all vote choices are reported.

(3) In elections in which voters have more than one vote for the same institution (e.g. parallel and mixed member proportional systems; double ballot systems), please ensure that all votes are supplied.

(4) In elections in which voters can cast preference votes (e.g.. STV., AV), please provide first and second preference vote.

If applicable and respondent cast a ballot:

This item should report the presidential candidate or party affiliation of the presidential candidate for whom the respondent voted......

01-95. [PLEASE PROVIDE PARTY CODES IN APPENDIX 1]

96. RESPONDENT CAST INVALID BALLOT

98. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 99. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

97. MISSING

------Q4B. >>> CURRENT ELECTION: VOTE CHOICE - PARTY LIST ------

NOTES: (1) The following vote choices should be reported, where appropriate:

Q4A. Presidential candid ate/ party choice Q4B. Legislative election: party list Q4C. Legislative election: candidate (or candidate preference)

(4) In elections in which voters can cast preference votes (e.g.. STV., AV), please provide first and second preference vote.

If applicable and respondent cast a ballot:

This item should report the respondent's vote choice......

01-95. [PLEASE PROVIDE PARTY CODES IN APPENDIX 1]

96. RESPONDENT CAST INVALID BALLOT

98. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 99. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

97. MISSING

------Q4C. >>> CURRENT ELECTION: VOTE CHOICE - DISTRICT CANDIDATE ------

NOTES: (1) The following vote choices should be reported, where appropriate:

Q4A. Presidential candid ate/ party choice Q4B. Legislative election: party list Q4C. Legislative election: candidate (or candidate preference)

(4) In elections in which voters can cast preference votes (e.g.. STV., AV), please provide first and second preference vote.

If applicable and respondent cast a ballot:

This item should report the respondent's vote choice......

01-95. [PLEASE PROVIDE PARTY CODES IN APPENDIX 1]

96. RESPONDENT CAST INVALID BALLOT

98. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 99. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

97. MISSING

------Q4D. >>> CURRENT ELECTION: DID R CAST CANDIDATE PREFERENCE VOTE ------

NOTE: If applicable and respondent cast a ballot:

This item should report whether or not the respondent cast a preference vote......

1. R EXERCISED CANDIDATE PREFERENCE 2. R DID NOT EXERCISE CANDIDATE PREFERENCE

6. INVALID BALLOT

8. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 9. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

7. MISSING

------Q5. >>> MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE ------

NOTES: (1) In the case of coincident presidential and lower house elections, questions to be asked about whichever of the president /government has been the predominant part of the executive.

(2) COLLABORATORS SHOULD CODE OPEN-ENDED ANSWERS TO their country issues. Please code open-ended answers with a detailed issue coding and with the minimum of at least 20 categories. Collaborator should submit translated scheme into English; however, if the translation would overly delay the deposit the secretariat will make arrangements for translating.

...... TEXT: What do you think has been the most important issue facing [country] over the last [number of years that the last government was in office] years? ......

01-96. [PLEASE PROVIDE ISSUE CODES]

98. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 99. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

97. MISSING

------Q6. >>> GOVERNMENT PERFORMANCE: MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE ------

TEXT: And thinking about that issue, how good or bad a job do you think the government / president in [capital] has done over the past [number of years between the previous and the present election OR change in government.] years. Has it/ he/ she done a very good job? A good job? A bad job? A very bad job? ......

1. VERY GOOD JOB 2. GOOD JOB 3. BAD JOB 4. VERY BAD JOB

8. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 9. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

7. MISSING

------Q7. >>> GOVERNMENT PERFORMANCE: GENERAL ------

TEXT: Now thinking about the performance of the government in [capital]/president in general, how good or bad a job do you think the government / president in [capital] has done over the past [number of years between the previous and the present election OR change in government.] years. Has it/ he/ she done a very good job? A good job? A bad job? A very bad job? ......

1. VERY GOOD JOB 2. GOOD JOB 3. BAD JOB 4. VERY BAD JOB

8. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 9. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

7. MISSING

------Q8. >>> SATISFACTION WITH DEMOCRATIC PROCESS ------

TEXT: On the whole, are you very satisfied, fairly satisfied, not very satisfied, or not at all satisfied with the way democracy works in [country]? ......

1. VERY SATISFIED 2. FAIRLY SATISFIED 4. NOT VERY SATISFIED 5. NOT AT ALL SATISFIED

8. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 9. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

7. MISSING

------Q9. >>> WHO IS IN POWER CAN MAKE DIFFERENCE ------

SHOWCARD 1

TEXT: Some people say it makes a difference who is in power. Others say that it doesn't make a difference who is in power. Using the scale on this card, (where ONE means that it makes a difference who is in power and FIVE means that it doesn't make a difference who is in power), where would you place yourself? ......

1. IT MAKES A DIFFERENCE WHO IS IN POWER 2. 3. 4. 5. IT DOESN'T MAKE A DIFFERENCE WHO IS IN POWER

8. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 9. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

7. MISSING

------Q10. >>> WHO PEOPLE VOTE FOR MAKES A DIFFERENCE ------

SHOWCARD 2

TEXT: Some people say that no matter who people vote for, it won't make any difference to what happens. Others say that who people vote for can make a difference to what happens. Using the scale on this card, (where ONE means that voting won't make a difference to what happens and FIVE means that voting can make a difference), where would you place yourself? ......

1. WHO PEOPLE VOTE FOR WON'T MAKE A DIFFERENCE 2. 3. 4. 5. WHO PEOPLE VOTE FOR CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE

8. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 9. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

7. MISSING

------Q11. >>> DEMOCRACY BETTER THAN ANY OTHER FORM OF GOVERNMENT ------

TEXT: Please tell me how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statement: "Democracy may have problems buts it's better than any other form of government." (Do you agree strongly, agree, disagree, or disagree strongly with this statement?) ......

1. AGREE STRONGLY 2. AGREE 3. DISAGREE 4. DISAGREE STRONGLY

8. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 9. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

7. MISSING

------Q12. >>> PREVIOUS ELECTION: DID RESPONDENT CAST A BALLOT ------

NOTE: This item should ascertain whether or not the respondent cast a ballot, regardless of whether or not it was valid, in the PRECEDING election......

1. R CAST A BALLOT -> GO TO Q13 5. R DID NOT CAST A BALLOT -> GO TO Q14

8. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 9. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

7. MISSING

------Q13A. >>> PREVIOUS ELECTION: VOTE CHOICE - PRESIDENT ------

KL: These notes are the same as those included above, and likewise are repeated for each vote choice item.

NOTES: (1) The following vote choices should be reported, where appropriate:

Q13A. Presidential candid ate/ party choice Q13B. Legislative election: party list Q13C. Legislative election: candidate (or candidate preference)

(4) In elections in which voters can cast preference votes (e.g.. STV., AV), please provide first and second preference vote.

If applicable and respondent cast a ballot:

This item should report the presidential candidate or party affiliation of the presidential candidate for whom the respondent voted in the PRECEDING election......

01-95. [PLEASE PROVIDE PARTY CODES IN APPENDIX 1]

96. RESPONDENT CAST INVALID BALLOT

98. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 99. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

97. MISSING

------Q13B >>> PREVIOUS ELECTION: VOTE CHOICE - PARTY LIST ------

NOTES: (1) The following vote choices should be reported, where appropriate:

Q13A. Presidential candid ate/ party choice Q13B. Legislative election: party list Q13C. Legislative election: candidate (or candidate preference)

(4) In elections in which voters can cast preference votes (e.g.. STV., AV), please provide first and second preference vote.

If applicable and respondent cast a ballot:

This item should report the respondent's vote choice in the PRECEDING election......

01-95. [PLEASE PROVIDE PARTY CODES IN APPENDIX 1]

96. RESPONDENT CAST INVALID BALLOT

98. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 99. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

97. MISSING

------Q13C. >>> PREVIOUS ELECTION: VOTE CHOICE - DISTRICT CANDIDATE ------

NOTES: (1) The following vote choices should be reported, where appropriate:

Q13A. Presidential candid ate/ party choice Q13B. Legislative election: party list Q13C. Legislative election: candidate (or candidate preference)

(4) In elections in which voters can cast preference votes (e.g.. STV., AV), please provide first and second preference vote.

If applicable and respondent cast a ballot:

This item should report the respondent's vote choice in the PRECEDING election......

01-95. [PLEASE PROVIDE PARTY CODES IN APPENDIX 1]

96. RESPONDENT CAST INVALID BALLOT

98. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 99. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

97. MISSING

------Q13D. >>> PREVIOUS ELECTION: DID R CAST CANDIDATE PREFERENCE VOTE ------

NOTE: If applicable and respondent cast a ballot:

This item should report whether or not the respondent cast a preference vote in the PRECEDING election......

1. R EXERCISED CANDIDATE PREFERENCE 2. R DID NOT EXERCISE CANDIDATE PREF

6. INVALID BALLOT

8. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 9. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

7. MISSING

------Q14. >>> PERFORMANCE OF PARTY R VOTED FOR IN PREVIOUS ELECTION ------

NOTE: This question is not to be administered in presidential systems.

......

TEXT: How well did the party you voted for then perform over the past (NUMBER OF YEARS between the previous and the current election) years? Has it done a very good job? a good job? a bad job? a very bad job? ......

1. VERY GOOD JOB 2. GOOD JOB 3. BAD JOB 4. VERY BAD JOB

8. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 9. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

7. MISSING

------Q15. >>> HOW WELL VOTERS' VIEWS ARE REPRESENTED IN ELECTIONS ------

TEXT: Thinking about how elections in [country] work in practice, how well do elections ensure that the views of voters are represented by MPs: very well, quite well, not very well, or not well at all? ......

1. VERY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT VERY WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL

8. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 9. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

7. MISSING

------Q16. >>> IS THERE A PARTY THAT REPRESENTS R'S VIEWS ------

TEXT: Would you say that any of the parties in [country] represents your views reasonably well? ......

1. YES -> GO TO Q16A. 2. NO -> GO TO Q17.

8. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 9. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

7. MISSING

------Q16A. >>> PARTY THAT REPRESENTS R'S VIEWS BEST ------

TEXT: Which party represents your views best? ......

01-96. [PLEASE PROVIDE PARTY CODES IN APPENDIX 1]

98. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 99. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

97. MISSING

------Q17 >>> IS THERE A LEADER THAT REPRESENTS R'S VIEWS ------

TEXT: Regardless of how you feel about the parties, would you say that any of the individual party leaders / presidential candidates at the last election represents your views reasonably well? ......

1. YES -> GO TO Q17A. 2. NO -> GO TO Q18.

8. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 9. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

7. MISSING

------Q17A. >>> LEADER THAT REPRESENTS R'S VIEWS BEST ------

TEXT: Which [party leader/presidential candidate] represents your views best? ......

01-96. [PLEASE PROVIDE PARTY CODES IN APPENDIX 1]

98. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 99. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

97. MISSING

------Q18 >>> ARE YOU CLOSE TO ANY POLITICAL PARTY ------

TEXT: Do you usually think of yourself as close to any particular political party? ......

1. YES -> GO TO Q18A. 5. NO -> GO TO Q18C.

8. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW -> GO TO Q18C. 9. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED -> GO TO Q18C.

7. MISSING

------Q18A1. >>> PARTY CLOSEST TO - 1ST MENTION ------

NOTE: The administration of this question should allow respondents to identify three parties.

If electoral blocks are competing in the election, respondents who identify an electoral block should be asked to identify up to three parties within the block, as well.

......

TEXT: Which party is that? ......

01-96. [PLEASE PROVIDE PARTY CODES IN APPENDIX 1]

-> GO TO Q18A2 OR -> GO TO Q18A1.1 IF ELECTORAL BLOCK IS IDENTIFIED

98. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW -> GO TO Q18C 99. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED -> GO TO Q18C

97. MISSING

------Q18A2. >>> PARTY CLOSEST TO - 2ND MENTION ------

NOTE: The administration of this question should allow respondents to identify three parties.

If electoral blocks are competing in the election, respondents who identify an electoral block should be asked to identify up to three parties within the block, as well.

......

TEXT: Which party is that? ......

01-96. [PLEASE PROVIDE PARTY CODES IN APPENDIX 1]

-> GO TO Q18A3. OR -> GO TO Q18A1.1 IF ELECTORAL BLOCK IS IDENTIFIED

98. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW -> GO TO Q18E. 99. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED -> GO TO Q18E.

97. MISSING ------Q18A3. >>> PARTY CLOSEST TO - 3RD MENTION ------

NOTE: The administration of this question should allow respondents to identify three parties.

If electoral blocks are competing in the election, respondents who identify an electoral block should be asked to identify up to three parties within the block, as well.

......

TEXT: Which party is that? ......

01-96. PARTY [PLEASE PROVIDE PARTY CODES IN APPENDIX 1]

-> GO TO Q18B. OR -> GO TO Q18A1.1 IF ELECTORAL BLOCK IS IDENTIFIED

98. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW -> GO TO Q18B 99. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED -> GO TO Q18B

97. MISSING

------Q18A1.1. >>> BLOCK PARTY CLOSEST TO - 1ST MENTION ------

TEXT: Which party in [NAME OF BLOCK] do you feel closest to? ......

01-96. [PLEASE PROVIDE PARTY CODES IN APPENDIX 1]

-> GO TO Q18A1.2

98. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW -> GO TO Q18C 99. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED -> GO TO Q18C

97. MISSING

------Q18A1.2. >>> BLOCK PARTY CLOSEST TO - 2ND MENTION ------

TEXT: Which party in [NAME OF BLOCK] do you feel closest to? ......

01-96. [PLEASE PROVIDE PARTY CODES IN APPENDIX 1]

-> GO TO Q18A1.3

98. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW -> GO TO Q18E 99. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED -> GO TO Q18E

97. MISSING ------Q18A1.3. >>> BLOCK PARTY CLOSEST TO - 3RD MENTION ------

TEXT: Which party in [NAME OF BLOCK] do you feel closest to? ......

01-96. [PLEASE PROVIDE PARTY CODES IN APPENDIX 1]

-> GO TO Q18B

98. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW -> GO TO Q18B 99. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED -> GO TO Q18B

97. MISSING

------Q18B. >>> WHICH PARTY DO YOU FEEL CLOSEST TO ------

NOTE: This question is to be asked of respondents who identify more than one party in Q18A.

......

TEXT: Which party do you feel closest to? ......

01-96. PARTY [PLEASE PROVIDE PARTY CODES IN APPENDIX 1] -> GO TO Q18E.

98. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW -> GO TO Q19. 99. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED -> GO TO Q19.

97. MISSING

------Q18C. >>> DO YOU FEEL CLOSER TO ONE PARTY ------

TEXT Do you feel yourself a little closer to one of the political parties than the others? ......

1. YES -> GO TO Q18D. 5. NO -> GO TO Q19

8. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW -> GO TO Q19 9. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED -> GO TO Q19

7. MISSING

------Q18D. >>> WHICH PARTY DO YOU FEEL CLOSER TO ------

TEXT: Which party is that? ......

01-96. [PLEASE PROVIDE PARTY CODES IN APPENDIX 1] -> GO TO Q18E.

98. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 99. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

97. MISSING

------Q18E. >>> DEGREE OF CLOSENESS TO THIS PARTY ------

TEXT: Do you feel very close to this [party/ party block], somewhat close, or not very close? ......

1. VERY CLOSE 2. SOMEWHAT CLOSE 3. NOT VERY CLOSE

8. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 9. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

7. MISSING

------Q19A >>> LIKE-DISLIKE - PARTY A Q19B >>> LIKE-DISLIKE - PARTY B Q19C >>> LIKE-DISLIKE - PARTY C Q19D >>> LIKE-DISLIKE - PARTY D Q19E >>> LIKE-DISLIKE - PARTY E Q19F >>> LIKE-DISLIKE - PARTY F ------

NOTES: (1) Where possible, collaborators should ask about all parties represented or likely to be represented in the Parliament (or running in the presidential contest). In circumstances where there are more than six such parties, collaborators should ask at least about the six most relevant parties. In assessing relevance, collaborators should consider likely size and likely importance in coalition formation. If parties only contest elections in part of the country, those parties need only be asked about in those parts of the country where they contest seats.

(2) It is important that interviewers properly record the volunteered responses don't know and haven't heard of when respondents offer either response.

......

SHOWCARD 3

TEXT: I'd like to know what you think about each of our political parties. After I read the name of a political party, please rate it on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 means you strongly dislike that party and 10 means that you strongly like that party. If I come to a party you haven't heard of or you feel you do not know enough about, just say so. The first party is [PARTY A]......

00. STRONGLY DISLIKE 01. 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. 07. 08. 09. 10. STRONGLY LIKES

96. VOLUNTEERED: HAVEN'T HEARD OF

98. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 99. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

97. MISSING

------Q20A >>> LEFT-RIGHT - PARTY A Q20B >>> LEFT-RIGHT - PARTY B Q20C >>> LEFT-RIGHT - PARTY C Q20D >>> LEFT-RIGHT - PARTY D Q20E >>> LEFT-RIGHT - PARTY E Q20F >>> LEFT-RIGHT - PARTY F ------

NOTES: Question to be asked of up to six 'relevant' parties. In presidential elections, question to be asked also of 'major' presidential candidates. (Candidates A through F should match parties A through F where appropriate.)

In addition where left/ right is not considered meaningful/ important/ widely understood, also administer a second scale which is thought to best summarize the main ideological division in [country]. Ask of the same set of parties/ candidates as 'left-right'.

......

SHOWCARD 4

TEXT: In politics people sometimes talk of left and right. Where would you place [PARTY A] on a scale from 0 to 10 where 0 means the left and 10 means the right? Using the same scale, where would you place, [PARTY B]? Using the same scale, where would you place, [PARTY C]? Using the same scale, where would you place, [PARTY D]? Using the same scale, where would you place, [PARTY E]? Using the same scale, where would you place, [PARTY F]? ......

00. LEFT 01. 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. 07. 08. 09. 10. RIGHT

96. VOLUNTEERED: HAVEN'T HEARD OF 98. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 99. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

97. MISSING

------Q21A. >>> POLITICAL PARTICIPATION: CONTACTED A POLITICIAN ------

TEXT: Over the past five years or so, have you done any of the following things to express your views about something the government should or should not be doing?

(Have you) contacted a politician or government official either in person, or in writing, or some other way? ......

1. YES 2. NO

8. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 9. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

7. MISSING

------Q21B. >>> POLITICAL PARTICIPATION: PROTEST OR DEMOSTRATION ------

TEXT: Over the past five years or so, have you done any of the following things to express your views about something the government should or should not be doing?

(Have you) taken part in a protest, march or demonstration? ......

1. YES 2. NO

8. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 9. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

7. MISSING ------Q21C. >>> POLITICAL PARTICIPATION: WORKED WITH OTHERS ------

TEXT: Over the past five years or so, have you done any of the following things to express your views about something the government should or should not be doing?

(Have you) worked together with people who shared the same concern? ......

1. YES 2. NO

8. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 9. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

7. MISSING

------Q22 >>> RESPECT FOR INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM AND HUMAN RIGHTS ------

TEXT: How much respect is there for individual freedom and human rights nowadays in (country)? Do you feel there is a lot of respect for individual freedom, some respect, not much respect, or no respect at all? ......

1. A LOT OF RESPECT FOR INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM 2. SOME RESPECT 3. NOT MUCH RESPECT 4. NO RESPECT AT ALL

8. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 9. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

7. MISSING

------Q23 >>> HOW WIDESPREAD IS CORRUPTION ------

TEXT: Q23. How widespread do you think corruption such as bribe taking is amongst politicians in [country]: very widespread, quite widespread, not very widespread, it hardly happens at all? ......

1. VERY WIDESPREAD 2. QUITE WIDESPREAD 3. NOT VERY WIDESPREAD 4. IT HARDLY HAPPENS AT ALL

8. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 9. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

7. MISSING

------Q24. >>> LEFT-RIGHT - SELF ------

SHOWCARD 4

TEXT: In politics people sometimes talk of left and right. Where would you place yourself on a scale from 0 to 10 where 0 means the left and 10 means the right? ......

00. LEFT 01. 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. 07. 08. 09. 10. RIGHT

98. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 99. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

97. MISSING

------Q25 >>> POLITICAL INFORMATION ITEM - 1ST Q26 >>> POLITICAL INFORMATION ITEM - 2ND Q27 >>> POLITICAL INFORMATION ITEM - 3RD ------

NOTE: These items are designed to indicate the respondents' general political knowledge. They should be coded as shown below. The set of questions should include one that is easy (i.e. 2/3 will answer correctly), one that is slight more difficult (i.e. 1/2 will answer correctly), and one that is difficult (i.e. 1/3 will answer correctly)......

1. CORRECT 2. INCORRECT

8. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 9. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

7. MISSING

======))) CSES MODULE 2 MICRO-LEVEL DATA: DEMOGRAPHIC VARIABLES ======

NOTE: Collaborators should collect data regarding the respondents' socio-economic status, such that the following variables can be reported, and such that the data can be coded into the structure provided.

------D1. >>> AGE ------

NOTE: This variable should report the age of the respondent (in years)......

010-150. AGE, IN YEARS

998. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 999. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

997. MISSING

------D2. >>> GENDER ------

NOTE: This item should report the gender of the respondent......

1. MALE 2. FEMALE

9. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

7. MISSING

------D3. >>> EDUCATION ------

NOTE: This item should report the respondent's level of education. Categories should distinguish:

Incomplete primary: R left school before completing the level of education required (at the time R left school) for entry into secondary school.

Primary completed: R completed the level of education required (at the time respondent left school) for entry into secondary school, but has never attended secondary school.

Incomplete secondary: R attended secondary school, but has never achieved the minimum level of qualifications normally required (at the time R left school) for entry into university or other degree level higher education. Respondents currently studying for such qualifications should also be included in this category.

Secondary completed: R has at least the minimum qualifications normally required (at the time R left school) for entry into university or other degree level higher education but has never entered a university or other degree level course of higher education.

Post-secondary trade / vocational school: R has attended a non-degree granting institution teaching a skilled trade, or providing subdegree professional or technical.

University incomplete: R has attended university or entered other degree level of course of higher education but either left before successful completion of an undergraduate level degree, or has yet to complete a degree upon which currently embarked.

University degree completed: R has undergraduate level or higher degree.

......

98. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 99. MISSING

97. MISSING

------D4. >>> MARITAL STATUS ------

NOTE: This variable reports the respondent's current marital status. For instance, a person who is both divorced and living as married would be coded 1......

1. MARRIED OR LIVING TOGETHER AS MARRIED 2. WIDOWED 3. DIVORCED OR SEPARATED (MARRIED BUT SEPARATED / NOT LIVING WITH LEGAL SPOUSE) 4. SINGLE, NEVER MARRIED

8. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 9. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

7. MISSING

------D5. >>> UNION MEMBERSHIP ------

NOTE: This item should indicate whether or not the respondent is a member of a union......

1. R IS MEMBER OF A UNION 2. R IS NOT A MEMBER OF A UNION

8. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 9. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

7. MISSING

------D6. >>> UNION MEMBERSHIP OF OTHERS IN HOUSEHOLD ------

NOTE: This item should indicate whether or not a member of the respondent's household is a member of a union......

1. SOMEONE ELSE (OTHER THAN R) IS MEMBER OF A UNION 2. NO ONE ELSE (OTHER THAN R) IS A MEMBER OF A UNION

8. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 9. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

7. MISSING

------D7. >>> BUSINESS OR EMPLOYERS' ASSOCIATION MEMBERSHIP ------

NOTE: This item should indicate whether or not the respondent is a member of a business or employer's association......

1. R IS A MEMBER OF A BUSINESS OR EMPLOYERS' ASSOCIATION 2. R IS NOT A MEMBER OF A BUSINESS OR EMPLOYERS' ASSOCIATION

8. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 9. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

7. MISSING

------D8. >>> FARMERS' ASSOCIATION MEMBERSHIP ------

NOTE: This item should indicate whether or not the respondent is a member of a farmers' association......

1. R IS A MEMBER OF A FARMERS' ASSOCIATION 2. R IS NOT A MEMBER OF A FARMERS' ASSOCIATION

8. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 9. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

7. MISSING

------D9. >>> PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION MEMBERSHIP ------

NOTE: This item should indicate whether or not the respondent is a member of a professional association......

1. R IS A MEMBER OF A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 2. R IS NOT A MEMBER OF A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION

8. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 9. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

7. MISSING

------D10. >>> CURRENT EMPLOYMENT STATUS ------

NOTES: This item should indicate the respondent's current employment status.

Respondents who are temporarily unemployed are coded UNEMPLOYED.

Respondents on "workfare" or enrolled in a government job training program are coded EMPLOYED......

IN LABOR FORCE:

01. EMPLOYED - FULL TIME (32+ HOURS WEEKLY) 02. EMPLOYED - PART TIME (15-32 HOURS WEEKLY) 03. EMPLOYED - LESS THAN 15 HOURS 04. HELPING FAMILY MEMBER 05. UNEMPLOYED

NOT IN LABOR FORCE:

06. STUDENT, IN SCHOOL, IN VOCATIONAL TRAINING 07. RETIRED 08. HOUSEWIFE, HOME DUTIES 09. PERMANENTLY DISABLED 10. OTHERS, NOT IN LABOR FORCE

98. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 99. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

97. MISSING

------D11. >>> MAIN OCCUPATION ------

NOTES: This item should report the respondent's main occupation, that is, the job at which the respondent spends most of the time or if the respondent spends an equal amount of time on two jobs, it is the one from which the respondent earns the most money. For respondents who are currently employed, this variable reports their current occupation. For respondents who are retired or not currently working, code last occupation.

Coding conventions shall employ the first two-digits of 1988 ISCO / ILO International Standard Classification of Occupations Code from the International Labor Office, CH-1211, Geneva 22, Switzerland......

ARMED FORCES

01. ARMED FORCES

LEGISLATORS, SENIOR OFFICIALS, AND MANAGERS

11. LEGISLATORS AND SENIOR OFFICIALS 12. CORPORATE MANAGERS 13. GENERAL MANAGERS

PROFESSIONALS

21. PHYSICAL, MATHEMATICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCE 22. LIFE SCIENCE AND HEALTH PROFESSIONALS 23. TEACHING PROFESSIONALS 24. OTHER PROFESSIONALS

TECHNICIANS AND ASSOCIATED PROFESSIONALS

31. PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCE ASSOCIATE PROFESSIONALS 32. LIFE SCIENCE AND HEALTH ASSOCIATE PROFESSIONALS 33. TEACHING ASSOCIATE PROFESSIONALS 34. OTHER ASSOCIATE PROFESSIONALS

CLERKS

41. OFFICE CLERKS 42. CUSTOMER SERVICES CLERKS 43. ADMINISTRATION OF CHARITABLE OR NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS

SERVICES WORKERS AND SHOP AND MARKET SALES WORKERS

51. PERSONAL AND PROTECTIVE SERVICE WORKERS 52. MODELS, SALES PERSONS AND DEMONSTRATORS 53. TRADE, CONSUMER SERVICES

SKILLED AGRICULTURAL AND FISHERY WORKERS

61. MARKET-ORIENTED SKILLED AGRICULTURAL AND FISHERY WORKERS 62. SUBSISTENCE AGRICULTURAL AND FISHERY WORKERS

CRAFT AND RELATED TRADE WORKERS

71. EXTRACTION AND BUILDING TRADE WORKERS 72. METAL, MACHINERY AND RELATED TRADE WORKERS 73. PRECISION, HANDICRAFT, PRINTING AND RELATED TRADE WORKERS 74. OTHER CRAFT AND RELATED TRADES WORKERS

PLANT AND MACHINE OPERATORS AND ASSEMBLERS

81. STATIONARY-PLANT AND RELATED OPERATORS 82. MACHINE OPERATORS AND ASSEMBLERS 83. DRIVERS AND MOBILE-PLANT OPERATORS 84. OTHER PLANT AND MACHINE OPERATORS AND ASSEMBLERS

ELEMENTARY OCCUPATIONS

96. OTHER OR NON-CLASSIFIABLE OCCUPATIONS (NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO CLASSIFY)

98. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 99. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

97. MISSING

------D12. >>> SOCIO ECONOMIC STATUS ------

NOTES: This item should report the respondent's socio economic status.

The categories are intended to distinguish among the following groups:

01. White collar: broad occupational grouping of workers engaged in non manual labor: Managers, salaried professionals, office workers, sales personnel, and proprietors are generally included in the category.

02. Worker: broad occupational grouping of workers engaged in manual labor.

03. Farmer: Normally persons self-employed in farming.

04. Self-employed: Self-employed occupations of all kinds, excluding self-employed farming. Included for example entrepreneurs, shop keeper, professionals like lawyers, medical doctors etc......

1. WHITE COLLAR 2. WORKER 3. FARMER 4. SELF-EMPLOYED

8. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 9. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

7. MISSING

------D13. >>> EMPLOYMENT TYPE - PUBLIC OR PRIVATE ------

NOTE: This item should report whether respondent's employment is in the public, private, mixed or non-profit sector......

1. PUBLIC SECTOR 2. PRIVATE SECTOR 3. MIXED 4. "THIRD SECTOR"/NON-PROFIT SECTOR

8. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 9. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

7. MISSING

------D14. >>> INDUSTRIAL SECTOR ------

NOTE: This item should report the sector of the respondent's main occupation......

8. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 9. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

7. MISSING

------D15. >>> SPOUSE: CURRENT EMPLOYMENT STATUS ------

NOTES: This item should indicate the current employment status of the respondent's spouse.

Those who are temporarily unemployed are coded UNEMPLOYED.

Those on "workfare" or enrolled in a government job training program are coded EMPLOYED.

......

IN LABOR FORCE:

01. EMPLOYED - FULL TIME (32+ HOURS WEEKLY) 02. EMPLOYED - PART TIME (15-32 HOURS WEEKLY) 03. EMPLOYED - LESS THAN 15 HOURS 04. HELPING FAMILY MEMBER 05. UNEMPLOYED

NOT IN LABOR FORCE:

06. STUDENT, IN SCHOOL, IN VOCATIONAL TRAINING 07. RETIRED 08. HOUSEWIFE, HOME DUTIES 09. PERMANENTLY DISABLED 10. OTHERS, NOT IN LABOR FORCE

98. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 99. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

97. MISSING

------D16. >>> SPOUSE: OCCUPATION ------

NOTES: This item should report the main occupation of the respondent's, spouse, that is, the job at which the spouse spends most of the time or if the respondent spends an equal amount of time on two jobs, it is the one from which the respondent earns the most money. For spouses who are currently employed, this variable reports their current occupation. For spouse who are retired or not currently working, code last occupation.

ARMED FORCES

01. ARMED FORCES.

LEGISLATORS, SENIOR OFFICIALS, AND MANAGERS

11. LEGISLATORS AND SENIOR OFFICIALS 12. CORPORATE MANAGERS 13. GENERAL MANAGERS

PROFESSIONALS

21. PHYSICAL, MATHEMATICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCE 22. LIFE SCIENCE AND HEALTH PROFESSIONALS 23. TEACHING PROFESSIONALS 24. OTHER PROFESSIONALS

TECHNICIANS AND ASSOCIATED PROFESSIONALS

31. PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCE ASSOCIATE PROFESSIONALS 32. LIFE SCIENCE AND HEALTH ASSOCIATE PROFESSIONALS 33. TEACHING ASSOCIATE PROFESSIONALS 34. OTHER ASSOCIATE PROFESSIONALS

CLERKS

41. OFFICE CLERKS 42. CUSTOMER SERVICES CLERKS 43. ADMINISTRATION OF CHARITABLE OR NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS

SERVICES WORKERS AND SHOP AND MARKET SALES WORKERS

51. PERSONAL AND PROTECTIVE SERVICE WORKERS 52. MODELS, SALES PERSONS AND DEMONSTRATORS 53. TRADE, CONSUMER SERVICES

SKILLED AGRICULTURAL AND FISHERY WORKERS

61. MARKET-ORIENTED SKILLED AGRICULTURAL AND FISHERY WORKERS 62. SUBSISTENCE AGRICULTURAL AND FISHERY WORKERS

CRAFT AND RELATED TRADE WORKERS

71. EXTRACTION AND BUILDING TRADE WORKERS 72. METAL, MACHINERY AND RELATED TRADE WORKERS 73. PRECISION, HANDICRAFT, PRINTING AND RELATED TRADE WORKERS 74. OTHER CRAFT AND RELATED TRADES WORKERS

PLANT AND MACHINE OPERATORS AND ASSEMBLERS

81. STATIONARY-PLANT AND RELATED OPERATORS 82. MACHINE OPERATORS AND ASSEMBLERS 83. DRIVERS AND MOBILE-PLANT OPERATORS 84. OTHER PLANT AND MACHINE OPERATORS AND ASSEMBLERS

ELEMENTARY OCCUPATIONS

96. OTHER OR NON-CLASSIFIABLE OCCUPATIONS (NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO CLASSIFY)

98. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 99. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

97. MISSING

------D17. >>> SPOUSE: SOCIO ECONOMIC STATUS ------

NOTES: This item should report the socio economic status of the respondent's spouse.

The categories are intended to distinguish among the following groups:

02. Worker: broad occupational grouping of workers engaged in manual labor.

03. Farmer: Normally persons self-employed in farming.

04. Self-employed: Self-employed occupations of all kinds, excluding self-employed farming. Included for example entrepreneurs, shop keeper, professionals like lawyers, medical doctors etc......

1. WHITE COLLAR 2. WORKER 3. FARMER 4. SELF-EMPLOYED

8. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 9. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

7. MISSING

------D18. >>> SPOUSE: EMPLOYMENT TYPE - PUBLIC OR PRIVATE ------

NOTE: This item should report whether the spouse's employment is in the public, private, mixed or non-profit sector......

1. PUBLIC SECTOR 2. PRIVATE SECTOR 3. MIXED 4. "THIRD SECTOR"/NON-PROFIT SECTOR

8. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 9. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

7. MISSING

------D19. >>> SPOUSE: INDUSTRIAL SECTOR ------

NOTE: This item should report the sector of the respondent's main occupation......

8. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 9. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

7. MISSING

------D20. >>> HOUSEHOLD INCOME ------

NOTE: This item should report the household income quintile in which the respondent falls......

1. LOWEST HOUSEHOLD INCOME QUINTILE 2. SECOND HOUSEHOLD INCOME QUINTILE 3. THIRD HOUSEHOLD INCOME QUINTILE 4. FOURTH HOUSEHOLD INCOME QUINTILE 5. HIGHEST HOUSEHOLD INCOME QUINTILE

8. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 9. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

7. MISSING

------D21. >>> NUMBER IN HOUSEHOLD ------

NOTE: This variable should report the number of persons in household - that is, the number of persons living together in the housing unit excluding paid employees and persons who pay for rent for a room......

01-90. NUMBER OF PERSONS

98. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 99. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

97. MISSING

------D22. >>> NUMBER IN HOUSEHOLD UNDER AGE 18 ------

NOTE: This item should report the number of people in household under the age of 18......

00-90. NUMBER OF PEOPLE

98. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 99. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

97. MISSING

------D23. >>> RELIGIOUS SERVICES ATTENDANCE ------

NOTE: This variable should report the frequency with which the respondent attend religious services.

This variable is an optional variable in the CSES battery......

1. NEVER 2. ONCE A YEAR 3. TWO TO ELEVEN TIMES A YEAR 4. ONCE A MONTH 5. TWO OR MORE TIMES A MONTH 6. ONCE A WEEK

8. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 9. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

7. MISSING

------D24. >>> RELIGIOSITY ------

NOTE: This variable should indicate whether or not and how strongly the respondent holds religious beliefs......

1. HAVE NO RELIGIOUS BELIEFS 2. NOT VERY RELIGIOUS 3. SOMEWHAT RELIGIOUS 4. VERY RELIGIOUS

8. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 9. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

7. MISSING

------D25. >>> RELIGIOUS DENOMINATION ------

NOTE: This item should report the respondent's religious denomination......

01. ROMAN CATHOLIC

PROTESTANT

NON-TRADITIONAL PROTESTANTS

14. CHRISTIAN SCIENTISTS 15. MORMONS; LATTER DAY SAINTS 16. UNITARIAN; UNIVERSALIST 17. EASTERN ORTHODOX (GREEK RITE CATHOLIC) 18. CHRISTIAN (NO DENOMINATION GIVEN)

20. JEWISH

ISLAM

30. MUSLIM; MOHAMMEDAN; ISLAM (NO DENOMINATION GIVEN) 31. KHARIJISM 32. MU'TAZILISM 33. SUNNI 34. SHI'ISM 35. ISMA'ILIS 36. BAHA'I 37. DRUSE

BUDDHISM

40. BUDDHIST 41. THERAVADA 42. MAHAYANA 43. TANTRISM 44. TIBETAN BUDDHISM 45. SHINGON

HINDUISM AND OTHER RELIGIONS OF INDIA

50. HINDU 51. JAINISM 52. SIKHIASM 53. PARSIISM 54. VEDISM 55. BRAHMANISM 56. VAISAVISM 57. SAIVISM 58. TANTRISM 59. SHAKTISM 60. FOLK HINDUISM

INDIGENOUS RELIGIONS OF EAST ASIA

71. CONFUCIANISM 72. TAOISM 73. SHINT 74. BAHAI 75. I-KUAN-TAO

OTHERS

80. OTHER RELIGIONS 81. AGNOSTICS 82. ATHEISTS 83. NONE

91. REFORMED CALVINIST (NOT PRESB)

98. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 99. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

97. MISSING

------D26. >>> LANGUAGE USUALLY SPOKEN AT HOME ------

NOTE: This variable reports the language usually spoken in the respondents' household. If more than one language is spoken at home, this variable should report the language spoken most of the time......

013. BASQUE 234. BALKAR 014. BELORUSSIAN 015. BEMBA (ZAMBIA) 016. BENGALI, BANGLADESHI, BANGLA (INDIA) 017. BHOJPURI (INDIA) 202. BLUCH (PAKISTAN) 018. BOSNIAN 019. BRETON 020. BULGARIAN

021. CATALAN 022. CHECHEN (RUSSIA) 203. CHINESE, CANTONESE 023. CHINESE, HAKKA 024. CHINESE, MANDARIN 025. CHINESE, MIN NAN 026. CHUVASH (RUSSIA) 027. CROATIAN 028. CZECH

029. DANISH 030. DECCAN (INDIA) 204. DORIC (SCOTLAND) 031. DUTCH

032. ENGLISH 033. ERZYA (RUSSIA) 205. ESAN (NIGERIA) 034. ESTONIAN 206. EWE (GHANA)

209. FARSI (IRAN) 035. FINNISH 036. FRENCH 037. FRISIAN, WESTERN (NEATHERLAND) 038. FULACUNDA (SENEGAL)

048. HEBREW 049. HUNGARIAN 051. HINDI

050. ICELANDIC 210. INDONESIAN 211. IRANIAN 052. ITALIAN 212. IWO (UGANDA)

053. JAKATI (MOLDOVA) 213. JAMAICAN PATOIS 054. JAPANESE

055. KANNADA (INDIA) 056. KAONDE (ZAMBIA) 057. KARAIM (LITHUANIA) 233. KARBADIN 058. KIRMANJKI (TURKEY) 235. KOMI 232. KURDISH 059. KURMANJI (TURKEY)

060. LADINO (ISRAEL) 061. LALA-BISA (ZAMBIA) 062. LAMBA (ZAMBIA) 063. LATVIAN 064. LENJE (ZAMBIA) 065. LESSER ANTILLEAN CREOLE 067. LIGURIAN 068. LITHUANIAN 069. LOMBARD

070. LOZI (ZAMBIA) 071. LUNDA (ZAMBIA) 072. LUVALE (ZAMBIA)

087. NEAPOLITAN-CALABRESE 088. NORWEGIAN 089. NSENGA (ZAMBIA) 090. NYANJA (ZAMBIA) 091. NYIHA (ZAMBIA)

092. ORIYA (INDIA) 093. OSETIN (GEORGIA)

218. PAHARI (PAKISTAN) 094. PANJABI, EASTERN (INDIA) 236. PERSIAN 095. PIEMONTESE 096. POLISH 097. PORTUGUESE 098. PROVENCAL 219. PUSHTO (PAKISTAN)

099. QUECHUA, ANCASH, HUAYLAS 100. QUECHUA, SOUTH BOLIVIAN (ARGENTINA) 101. QUECH UA, AYACUCHO 102. QUICHUA, HIGHLAND, IMBABURA

103. ROMANI, BALKAN 104. ROMANI, CARPATHIAN 105. ROMANI, VLACH 106. RUMANIAN 107. RUMANIAN, ISTRO 108. RUMANIAN, MACEDO 109. RUSSIAN

135. UKRAINIAN 224. UGANDAN 230. UDMURT 136. URDU (INDIA)

228. VALENCIANO 225. VIETNAMESE 137. VENETIAN

138. XHOSA (SOUTH AFRICA)

139. WELSH 140. WOLOF (SENEGAL)

141. YAHUDIC (ISRAEL) 142. YIDDISH 226. YORUBA (NIGERIA)

143. ZULU

998. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 999. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

997. MISSING

------D27. >>> REGION OF RESIDENCE ------

NOTE: This variable reports the respondents' region of residence using coding categories not more detailed than the autonomous regions in Spain, or the Lander in Germany. Regions are usually (but not always) based upon the social, cultural, or historical differences (though some correspond to administrative regions) that manifest themselves in political cleavages......

01-80. [PLEASE PROVIDE REGION CODE LABELS]

97. MISSING

------D28. >>> RACE ------

NOTE: This item should report the respondent's race......

01. EUROPEAN (CAUCASOID) 02. ASIAN 03. AFRICAN (NEGROID) 04. INDIAN 05. POLYNEASIAN 06. MICRONEASIAN 07. MELANESIAN 08. AUSTRALOID 09. AMERICAN INDIAN

98. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 99. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

97. MISSING

------D29. >>> ETHNICITY ------

NOTE: This variable reports the ethnic identity of respondents......

001-997. [PLEASE PROVIDE ETHNICITY CODE LABELS]

998. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 999. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

997. MISSING

------D30. >>> RURAL OR URBAN RESIDENCE ------

NOTE: This item should distinguish respondents living in rural and urban regions.

Please provide the criteria used to distinguish these different regions......

1. RURAL AREA OR VILLAGE 2. SMALL OR MIDDLE-SIZED TOWN 3. SUBURBS OF LARGE TOWN OR CITY 4. LARGE TOWN OR CITY

8. VOLUNTEERED: DON'T KNOW 9. VOLUNTEERED: REFUSED

7. MISSING

------D31. >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICT ------

NOTE: This item should indicate the respondent's primary electoral district.

Wherever possible, this variable uses official district identification numbers......

00001-90000. [PLEASE PROVIDE DISTRICT CODE VALUE LABELS]

99997. MISSING