DOCSLIB.ORG

Linguistics Development Team

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Linguistics Development Team Development Team Principal Investigator: Prof. Pramod Pandey Centre for Linguistics / SLL&CS Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi Email: [email protected] Paper Coordinator: Prof. K. S. Nagaraja Department of Linguistics, Deccan College Post-Graduate Research Institute, Pune- 411006, [email protected] Content Writer: Prof. K. S. Nagaraja Prof H. S. Ananthanarayana Content Reviewer: Retd Prof, Department of Linguistics Osmania University, Hyderabad 500007 Paper : Historical and Comparative Linguistics Linguistics Module : Austro-Asiatic family – I Description of Module Subject Name Linguistics Paper Name Historical and Comparative Linguistics Module Title Austro-Asiatic family – I Module ID Lings_P7_M25 Quadrant 1 E-Text Paper : Historical and Comparative Linguistics Linguistics Module : Austro-Asiatic family – I 21.AUSTRO - ASIATIC LANGUAGE FAMILY Austroasiatic language family is one of the five important language families found in the Indian sub- continent. The others are Indo-Aryan (of Indo-European), Dravidian, Tibeto-Burman and Andamanese. The term 'Austroasiatic’ comes from the Latin word for south and the Greek name of Asia, hence South Asia. The speakers of this family are scattered across south and South-east Asia, starting from central and eastern parts of India spreading to Bangladesh, Burma, southern China, Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, South and North Vietnam and Malaysia. The languages of this family are generally grouped into three sub- branches, namely, Munda, Nicobarese and Mon-Khmer. However some scholars include Nicobarese within Mon-Khmer. While the Munda sub-branch is wholly located in the Indian-subcontinent, Mon- Khmer branch is found in most of South-east Asia starting with eastern India. The family comprises about 150 languages, most of them having numerous dialects and the speakers numbering more than 100 million. The Austroasiatic family is thought by some to be the first to have been spoken in ancient India. Austroasiatic languages include the Santal and Munda languages of eastern India, Nepal, and Bangladesh, and the Mon–Khmer languages spoken by the Khasi and Nicobarese in India and in Burma, Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam, and southern China. The Austroasiatic (AA) languages are thought to have been spoken throughout the Indian subcontinent by hunter- gatherers who were later assimilated first by the agriculturalist Dravidian settlers and later by the Indo-Aryan people arriving from the northwest of India. At one time, the AA domain probably extended unbroken from China to India to Malaysia, but intrusion by speakers of other languages split the AA community and divided it into enclaves. The Dravidians and Indo-Aryans entered India and certainly overran much of the Munda territory, doubtlessly reducing the AA population and certainly leaving the Munda languages scattered in small groups. The Tibeto-Burmans and Tais invaded Indo-China and split the AA domain in two. The Chams and Malays invaded Vietnam and Malaysia, respectively. The Chinese occupied northern Vietnam for nearly a millennium, and an Indian aristocracy apparently ruled parts of modern Cambodia and Thailand for some time. As a result of such incursions, few nation states ever developed in the AA domain, the Khmer, Mon, and Vietnamese empires being the exceptions, and most of the AA speakers have lived and still live in small tribal groups. All of these events had an impact on the AA languages, and for that reason, these languages exhibit an uncommon diversity that makes tracing their diachronic development extremely difficult. The Munda family has been influenced by a synthesizing, non-tonal Indian Sprachbund, the Mon-Khmer by an isolating, tonal Sinitic Sprachbund. In short, the two AA subfamilies have been pulled apart and consequently have evolved in different directions, which makes reconstructing their original phonology Paper : Historical and Comparative Linguistics Linguistics Module : Austro-Asiatic family – I and grammar a real challenge for historical linguists. Due to such difficulties and the inaccessibility of many of the tribal groups, AA studies have not proceeded apace with those of neighbouring language families. Comparatively speaking, little historical work has been done, and the proto-language of the family, the subfamilies, and most of the branches remain to be reconstructed. The speakers of Munda-sub-branch are considered to be one of the oldest groups living in this subcontinent. Though there are no literary texts in any of these languages as no language?incomplete. (At one time, the AA domain probably extended unbroken from China to India to Malaysia, but invasion by speakers of other languages split the AA community and divided it into enclaves. The Dravidians and Indo-Aryans entered India and certainly? overran much of the Munda territory, doubtlessly reducing the AA population and certainly leaving the Munda languages scattered in small groups. The Tibeto-Burmans and Tais invaded Indo-China and split the AA domain in two. The Chams and Malays invaded Vietnam and Malaysia, respectively. The Chinese occupied northern Vietnam for nearly a millennium, and an Indian aristocracy apparently ruled parts of modern Cambodia and Thailand for some time. As a result of such incursions, few nation states ever developed in the AA domain, the Khmer, Mon, and Vietnamese empires being the exceptions, and most of the AA speakers have lived and still live in small tribal groups. The date and place of the origin of Austroasiatic is still unknown. The place was probably southern or southeastern China; the date was at least circa 2000-2500 B.C. and possibly much earlier. From that location, AA speakers moved south into the Indo-China peninsula and west into India. Their southern- most expansion was the Nicobar Islands and the southern tip of Malaysia; some may have penetrated Sumatra and other islands, but this is uncertain. Their western-most expansion is unknown, but some argue that it extended into modern Pakistan. Austroasiatic languages have a disjunct distribution across India, Bangladesh and Southeast Asia, separated by regions where other languages are spoken. They appear to be the autochthonous languages of Southeast Asia, with the neighboring Indic, Tai, Dravidian, Austronesian, and Tibeto- Burman languages being the result of later migrations (Sidwell& Blench, 2011).(Once it is autochthonous, once it arrived here from southeastern China. Which do you prefer?) Genetic studies of representatives from all branches of Austroasiatic indicate the ancestors of Austroasiatic speakers originated in present-day India and migrated into Southeast Asia from the Brahmaputra River Valley. The Austroasiatic language family is considered to be one of the oldest families of this region. Khmer, Mon and Vietnamese are culturally the most important and have the longest recorded history. Among these languages, (only Vietnamese, Khmer, and Mon have a long recorded history), and only Vietnamese and Khmer have official status (in Vietnam and Cambodia, respectively). The rest of the languages are spoken by non-urban minority groups; written, if at all, only recently. The family is of great importance as a linguistic substratum for all Southeast Asian languages. Superficially, there seems to be little in common between a monosyllabic tone language such as Vietnamese and a polysyllabic toneless Munda language such as Mundari of India; every recent study, however, confirms the underlying unity of the family. The date of separation of the three main Austroasiatic subfamilies - Munda, Nicobarese and Mon-Khmer – has never been estimated and must be placed well back in prehistory. Within the MK subfamily itself, 12 main branches are distinguished; Paper : Historical and Comparative Linguistics Linguistics Module : Austro-Asiatic family – I glottochronological estimates of the time during which specific languages have evolved separately from a common source indicate that these 12 branches all separated about 3000 to 4000 years ago. Relationships with other language families have been proposed, but, because of the long durations involved and the scarcity of reliable data, it is very difficult to present a solid demonstration of their validity. Though there are no literary texts in any of the Munda languages (as no language of the group was put to writing at any time of the history;) oblique references to Munda languages can be found in the literary texts of Indo-Aryan languages. In ancient literature some of these people were referred to as Nishada, Kolla, Bhilla, Pulinda ~ Pulindra, Kiraata, Sabara, etc. For instance, the Kiraata people of the Vedic texts may be the present Kharia people; Šabara people mentioned in Aitareya Brahmana and other early Sanskrit texts may be the present Soara people. The Kharia and Juang consider themselves to be sections of the Šabara people of olden times. The Juang women used leaves as their garments until recently, for which reason they are also known as Patua. In this country most of these people are found in the midst of forests and mountains of central and eastern India and in Nicobar group of Islands. Only during the last two centuries a better understanding of these people has become possible. In the early 19th century, a beginning was made with the attempts of Hodgson and Max Müller. Hodgson (1848, 1856) hinted that there were actually three groups of languages in India, the Himalayan, Indo-Aryan and Tamulian. The last one included both the Dravidian and the Kol groups of languages. In 1854 Max Müller separated the Dravidian from Kol/Austric and referred to these people as ‘Munda’ for the first time. In due course of time this term was accepted to refer to these people as a group as such. 1. Sub-classification: Regarding sub-classification within AA, there have been several controversies. Schmidt, who first attempted a systematic comparison, included in AA a “mixed group” of languages containing “Malay” borrowings and did not consider Vietnamese to be a member of the family. As for Munda and Vietnamese, the recent works of the German linguist Heinz-Jürgen Pinnow on Kharia and of the French linguist Andre Haudricourt on Vietnamese tones have shown that both language groups are AA.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Paper Title (Use Style: Paper Title)
    International Journal of Innovative Research and Advanced Studies (IJIRAS) ISSN: 2394-4404 Volume 4 Issue 4, April 2017 A Study On Socio-Cultural Change Of Dudh Khadia Community In Contemporary Society Joachim Dung Dung Utkal University, Odisha Abstract: The Khadia tribe is an indigenous ethnic group of the tribal society. There are some authors who have described the khadia tribes into many sections, but general classification of khadia tribes is three types such as Dudh, Delki and Hill khadia. The Hill khadia is recognized as Pahari kharia or Sobor khadia. Somehow the Dudh khadia are more advanced than other two types of khadia Populations. They have their own cultural identity, which is depleting from the society. They are unique in their identity, language, dresses, profession/occupations and cultural practices. In the belief system they have changed their thought and religion, which has brought great impact in their life style system. The role and impact of globalization, industrialization and westernization on khadia tribes cannot be ignored. Both internal and external factors are often responsible for the changing of khadia culture and identity. The customary law of Dudh khadia has occupied it’s an important place to maintain and preservation of language, culture, tradition and their rights. Keywords: The following key words has been taken place in the title of A study on Socio- Cultural Change of Dudh khadia community in Contemporary Society (With special reference to Dudh khadia community of Sundargarh, Sambalpur and Deogarh Districts in Odisha), they are Origin of Totem, Bhuinhar places or Muhda, khadia marriage, economy and food pattern, religion, belief and festivals, education and advancement, khadia customary Law, khadia culture and tradition, cultural change and Dudh khadia and its Association etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribes and Tourism in India
    Component-I (A) – Personal details: Tourism in India Tribes and Tourism in India Prof. P. Bhaskar Reddy Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupati. Dr. E. Sivanagi Reddy Former Director, NITHM. Dr. E. Sivanagi Reddy & G. Mahender Reddy NITHM, Hyderabad. Prof. P Narayana Reddy REVA University, Bangalore. 1 Component-I (B) – Description of module: Subject Name Indian Culture Paper Name Tourism in India Module Name/Title Tribes and Tourism in India Module Id IC / TI / 27 Pre requisites Tribes and tourism, Tribal tourism in India To study about tribes and tourism in India Objectives and its scope and importance Keywords Tribes, Tourism, Tribal destinations E-Text (Quadrant-I): Introduction: Tribal Tourism is connected with tribal culture, values and traditions, tourism products owned and operated by tribal people. Tourism which includes tribal habitat, heritage, history and handicrafts, typically involves small tourism businesses owned by tribes or families. Tourism focused on indigenous knowledge of culture and nature. Modern India has many indigenous tribes, that even today, have retained their primitive customs and their lives are directly associated with their natural surroundings. In this light, this chapter discusses tribal tourism in India. Learning outcomes This chapter provides an overview of tribes and tourism in India and its importance. After reading the chapter you will be able to understand the following: What tribal tourism is, Major Tribes of India Significance of tribal tourism in India Major tribal destinations in India 1.0 Introduction to Tribes and Tourism Different terms used to describe Indigenous groups include Ethnic minorities (China, Vietnam, Philippines); Tribes (Africa, Americas); Hill tribes (Thailand); Dcheduled Tribes or adivasis (India); Native American, Indian or Amerindian (North and South America); Indigenes (Latin America); Aboriginal (Australia, Canada, Taiwan) and First Nations (Canada).
    [Show full text]
  • Scheduled Tribes
    Scheduled Tribes (Recognition of Forest Rights) Bill: A View from Anthropology and Call for Dialogue Author(s): Arnab Sen and Esther Lalhrietpui Source: Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 41, No. 39 (Sep. 30 - Oct. 6, 2006), pp. 4205-4210 Published by: Economic and Political Weekly Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4418763 Accessed: 07-01-2016 09:30 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/ info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Economic and Political Weekly is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Economic and Political Weekly. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 203.199.211.197 on Thu, 07 Jan 2016 09:30:28 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Scheduled Tribes (Recognitionof Forest Rights) Bill A View from Anthropologyand Call for Dialogue The value of forests in the lives of local communitieshas been widely discussed in academic literature, yet forest use is a domain of contestation. The new Scheduled Tribes (Recognition of Forest Rights) Bill needs to be contextualised in the ground reality of conflicting interests and claims. First, the category of scheduled tribes is contested in social science discourse. Second, forest and tribal policy in India is not adequatelysensitive to value systems of local communitiesand this creates considerable contestation between administrationand the local people.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhythm and the Holistic Organization of Language Structure1
    RHYTHM AND THE HOLISTIC ORGANIZATION OF LANGUAGE STRUCTURE1 Patricia Jane Donegan and David Stampe Department of Linguistics University of Hawai‘i Honolulu HI 96822 USA For André G. Haudricourt and Heinz-Jürgen Pinnow A living language is not just a collection of autonomous parts, but, as Sapir (1921) stressed, a harmonious and self-contained whole, massively resistant to change from without, which evolves according to an enigmatic, but unmistakably real, inner plan. We will draw on the structures and histories of the Munda and Mon-Khmer families of Austroasiatic languages2 to argue that this holistic organization is far more extensive even than Sapir imagined, linking all levels of linguistic structure -- from syntax through phonetics -- to each other in the synchrony and the long-term evolution of each language. And we will argue that the inner plan behind this holism of structure and evolution is the rhythmic pattern of phrases and words. The Munda languages differ widely in detail, but they are similar to each other in typology, and so are the Mon-Khmer languages. But Munda and Mon-Khmer are typologically opposite at every level: MUNDA MON-KHMER3 Phrase Accent: Falling (initial) Rising (final) Word Order: Variable -- SOV, AN, Rigid -- SVO, NA Postpositional Prepositional Syntax: Case, Verb Agreement Analytic Word Canon: Trochaic, Dactylic Iambic, Monosyllabic Morphology: Agglutinative, Fusional, Suffixing, Polysynthetic Prefixing or Isolating Timing: Isosyllabic, Isomoric Isoaccentual Syllable Canon: (C)V(C) unacc. (C)V, acc. (C)(C)V(G)(C) Consonantism: Stable, Shifting, Tonogenetic, Geminate Clusters Non-Geminate Clusters Tone/Register: Level Tone (Korku only) Contour Tones/Register Vocalism: Stable, Monophthongal, Shifting, Diphthongal, Harmonic Reductive The genetic relationship of Munda to Mon-Khmer was proposed in the 19th century, and by 1906 Schmidt had adduced a respectable body of cognates.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    Index Note: Page numbers in italics refer to figures and tables. 16R dune site, 36, 43, 440 Adittanallur, 484 Adivasi peoples see tribal peoples Abhaipur, 498 Adiyaman dynasty, 317 Achaemenid Empire, 278, 279 Afghanistan Acharyya, S.K., 81 in “Aryan invasion” hypothesis, 205 Acheulean industry see also Paleolithic era in history of agriculture, 128, 346 in Bangladesh, 406, 408 in human dispersals, 64 dating of, 33, 35, 38, 63 in isotope analysis of Harappan earliest discovery of, 72 migrants, 196 handaxes, 63, 72, 414, 441 skeletal remains found near, 483 in the Hunsgi and Baichbal valleys, 441–443 as source of raw materials, 132, 134 lack of evidence in northeastern India for, 45 Africa major sites of, 42, 62–63 cultigens from, 179, 347, 362–363, 370 in Nepal, 414 COPYRIGHTEDhominoid MATERIAL migrations to and from, 23, 24 in Pakistan, 415 Horn of, 65 related hominin finds, 73, 81, 82 human migrations from, 51–52 scholarship on, 43, 441 museums in, 471 Adam, 302, 334, 498 Paleolithic tools in, 40, 43 Adamgarh, 90, 101 research on stature in, 103 Addanki, 498 subsistence economies in, 348, 353 Adi Badri, 498 Agara Orathur, 498 Adichchanallur, 317, 498 Agartala, 407 Adilabad, 455 Agni Purana, 320 A Companion to South Asia in the Past, First Edition. Edited by Gwen Robbins Schug and Subhash R. Walimbe. © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Published 2016 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 0002649130.indd 534 2/17/2016 3:57:33 PM INDEX 535 Agra, 337 Ammapur, 414 agriculture see also millet; rice; sedentism; water Amreli district, 247, 325 management Amri,
    [Show full text]
  • The Austroasiatic Languages: a Typological Overview
    chapter 2 The Austroasiatic Languages: A Typological Overview Mathias Jenny, Tobias Weber and Rachel Weymuth The Austroasiatic (AA) languages are geographically widespread, occurring in mostly discontinuous pockets of speech communities. The vast majority of AA languages have no official status; the only exceptions are Vietnamese and Khmer, which are the national languages of Vietnam and Cambodia, respec- tively, and Khasi, which has official status in the Indian state of Meghalaya, where it is effectively used as a majority language by one million plus speak- ers for many purposes. Serving as vernaculars of non-majority populations in most countries where they are spoken, the AA languages are exposed to exter- nal influence to varying degrees. This has led to the great diversity of structures found in the AA languages today, which is partly due to different degrees of retention of inherited features, partly to language change, mostly under the influence of dominant neighboring languages. As the overall structure of the proto-language is not well known apart from various morphological processes found in branches separated by hundreds or thousands of kilometers for many centuries, it is often difficult to make conclusive statements concerning the origin of specific structural features in individual languages. While the verb final constituent order in the Munda languages can be attributed to areal South Asian influence with some confidence, we cannot readily explain the presence of verb initial structures found in Nicobarese as well as some Khasian and Palaungic languages. Typologically, the AA languages can be superficially grouped into three dis- tinct subgroups which belong to three geographic regions of the AA speaking area.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of the Munda Languages
    chapter 5 Overview of the Munda Languages Gregory D.S. Anderson 1 Introduction The Munda languages are a group of Austroasiatic languages spoken across portions of central and eastern India by perhaps as many as ten million people total. The Munda peoples are generally believed to represent autochthonous populations over much of their current areas of inhabitation. This is codified in one of the common terms used locally to describe them, adivasi or ‘aboriginal’. Approximate Distribution of N E P A Munda languages L Mundari UTTAR PRADESH Santali INDIA B BIHAR A N Agariya G L Korwa D A HAN Koda JHARK D MADHYA Santali E Agariya Koraku Asuri Turi S PRADESH 5 H KorwaAsuri 4 2 WEST 1 3 2 3 Santali1 BENGAL 5 4 Bhumij 1 5 2 3 Kharia 3 1 Korku H R A G Juang Mahali S 1. Birhor HARASHTRA I MA T ORISSA 2. Ho T A Gorum 3. Kharia H H Remo 4. Mundari C Sora 5. Turi ANDHRA Gutob PRADESH Gta 0 Miles 150 INDIAN OCEAN 0 Km 150 Map 5.1 Location of the Munda languages in India. © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, ���5 | doi ��.��63/9789004�8357�_006 overview of the munda languages 365 Originally, Munda-speaking peoples probably extended over a somewhat larger area before being marginalized into the relatively remote hill country and (formerly) forested areas primarily in the states of Odisha and Jharkhand; significant Munda-speaking groups are also to be found in Madhya Pradesh, and throughout remote areas of Chhattisgarh, West Bengal, Uttar Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh, and Maharashtra, and through migration to virtually all areas of India, especially in tea-producing regions like Assam.
    [Show full text]
  • Languages of the World--Indo-Pacific Fascicle Eight
    REPORT RESUMES ED 010 367 48 LANGUAGES OF THE WORLD--INDO-PACIFIC FASCICLE EIGHT. ST- VOEGELI1, C.F. VOEGELIN, FLORENCE M. INDIANA UNIV., BLOOMINGTON REPORT NUMBER NDEA- VI -63 -20 PUB DATE. APR 66 CONTRACT OEC-SAE-9480 FURS PRICE MF-$Q.18HC-52.80 70P. ANTHROPOLOGICAL LINGUISTICS, 8(4)/1-64, APRIL 1966 DESCRIPTORS- *LANGUAGES, *INDO PACIFIC LANGUAGES, ARCHIVES OF LANGUAGES OF THE WORLD, BLOOMINGTON, INDIANA THIS REPORT DESCRIBES SOME OF THE LANGUAGES AND LANGUAGE FAMILIES OF THE SOUTH AND SOUTHEAST ASIA REGIONS OF THE INDO-PACIFIC AREA. THE LANGUAGE FAMILIES DISCUSSED WERE JAKUM, SAKAI, SEMANG, PALAUNG-WA (SALWEEN), MUNDA, AND DRAVIDIAN. OTHER LANGUAGES DISCUSSED WERE ANDAMANESE, N/COBAnESE, KHASI, NAHALI, AND BCRUSHASKI. (THE REPORT IS PART OF A SERIES, ED 010 350 TO ED 010 367.) (JK) +.0 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE b D Office of Education tr's This document has been reproduced exactlyas received from the S.,4E" L es, C=4.) person or organiz3t1on originating It. Points of view or opinions T--I stated do not nocessart- represent official °dice of Edumdion poeWon or policy. AnthropologicalLinguistics Volume 8 Number 4 April 116 6 LANGUAGES OF THE WORLD: INDO- PACIFIC FASCICLE EIGHT A Publication of the ARCHIVES OFLANGUAGES OF THEWORLD Anthropology Department Indiana University ANTHROPOLOGICAL LINGUISTICS is designed primarily, but not exclusively, for the immediate publication of data-oriented papers for which attestation is available in the form oftape recordings on deposit in the Archives of Languages of the World.
    [Show full text]
  • ETHNIC, SOCIAL, OCCUPATIONAL and CULTURAL BACKGROUND of the WOMEN TEA PLANTATION WORKERS Chapter-4
    Chapjer- 4 · ETHNIC, SOCIAL, OCCUPATIONAL AND CULTURAL BACKGROUND OF THE WOMEN TEA PLANTATION WORKERS Chapter-4 ETHNIC, SOCIAL, OCCUPATIONAL AND CULTURAL BACKGROUND OF THE WOMEN TEA PLANTATION WORKERS. 4.1 Migration History : Migration is a special process, associated with the redistribution of population. Movement of an individual or groups which involves a permanent or Semi-permanent change of usual residence is migration (Wilson: 1985) The more authentic history ofNepalis migration to Darjeeling hills begins in the middle of the nineteenth century only when the East India company's trade interest had been focused on this region. The first large scale cultivation of tea for commercial purpose took place in 1852 and we have already discussed in the previous chapters about the close' interrelations between the growth of tea gardens and rapid increase of the population of Darjeeling mainly due to the migration of Nepalis from the hills of Nepal. The growth of tea gardens as a major factor in the migration of the Nepalis to this region has been duly emphasized by various scholars like L.S.S.O' Mally (1907) and later by Sunil Munsi (1980). Besides tea industry, the recruitment of Nepalis to British army is another important factor for the migration (Kansakar: 1980). As the old historical records shows the establishment of cantonments and barracks and a battalion of British infantry and Artillery stationed at Lebong (in 1847), Katapahar and Jalapahar in 1848. The Anglo-Nepalis Peace Treaty 1816 better known as the Segauli Treaty empowered the British Govt. to raise three regiments of Nepalis hill people in the British army.
    [Show full text]
  • Socio-Cultural History of the Hill Kharia Tribe of Mayurbhanj District
    The Researchers’ - Volume III, Issue II, December-2017 ISSN : 2455-1503 International Journal of Research UGC Journal No. - 64379 9 Socio-Cultural History of the Hill Kharia Tribe of Mayurbhanj district, Odisha Fagu Tudu , Department of History, RGNF Junior Research Fellow, KIIT University, Bhubaneswar Abstract Hill Kharia belongs to Primitive Tribal Group (PTGs) located mainly in Mayurbhanj, Balasore, Sundrgarh, Keonjhar and Denkanal districts of Odisha (India). But the majority of their population is limited to Mayurbhanj District. Hill Kharias are hunting and gathering tribes, moves inside the forest in search of food. They are a semi-nomadic tribe and their sustainability fully depends upon the forest. But now their income is limited they are not getting forest resources as they were getting earlier. After Similipal is declared as a National Park and Wildlife Sanctuary since 1958 and a Tiger Reserve in 1973 the restrictions have been imposed on the collection of minor forest produce in the reserve forest area and hunting has been strictly prohibited both the reserve and protected forests. Their economic condition is very poor at the moment. In consonance with the objectives of improving the socio-economic condition of Hill Kharia, the Government has launched various programmers to support them. These programmes meant for educational development, economic development and social development. With this background, the present study comes with the five sets of data includes Demography, Social condition, Educational status, Economic conditions of Hill Kharia tribes in the Mayurbhanj District of Odisha. Key words: Social life, Economic, Health Condition of the Hill Kharia Tribe, tribes in the Mayurbhanj.
    [Show full text]
  • The Munda Languages Mundari
    This article was downloaded by: 10.3.98.104 On: 25 Sep 2021 Access details: subscription number Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG, UK The Munda Languages Gregory D.S. Anderson Mundari Publication details https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315822433.chThree Toshiki Osada Published online on: 19 Mar 2008 How to cite :- Toshiki Osada. 19 Mar 2008, Mundari from: The Munda Languages Routledge Accessed on: 25 Sep 2021 https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315822433.chThree PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR DOCUMENT Full terms and conditions of use: https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/legal-notices/terms This Document PDF may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproductions, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The publisher shall not be liable for an loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material. CHAPTER THREE MUNDARI* Toshiki Osada 1 INTRODUCTION Mundari is mainly spoken in the state of Jharkhand, which was recently set up by the Government of India on 15 November 2000, and in the adjoining states of Orissa and West Bengal in India. Mua means ‘village-headman’ in Mundari.
    [Show full text]
  • The Austroasiatic Central Riverine Hypothesis
    Paul Sidwell Centre for research in Computational Linguistics (Bangkok) & Australian National University (Canberra) 1 The Austroasiatic central riverine hypothesis The paper considers the vexing issues of the homeland and dispersal of the Austroasiatic languages. A critical analysis finds little firm support for nested sub-groupings among a dozen recognised branches, while lexical analyses suggest a long-term pattern of contact and convergence within mainland Southeast Asia. These facts are interpreted as consistent with a stable long-term presence in Indo-China, probably centred on the Mekong River. The most geographically distant branch — the Munda of India — is treated as a highly innovative out- lier, and the evolution of Munda root structure is reconstructed, consistent with this theory. Keywords: Austroasiatic, Munda, comparative method, language relationship, lexicostatistics. Introduction The question of localizing the Austroasiatic (AA) homeland is a crucial and increasingly topical one for scholars interested in the prehistory of Mainland Southeast Asia. A geneological lan- guage classification can inform discussion of this point, since the correlation of geography and phylogeentic distribution may permit inferences concerning migration routes, contacts, and time depths. In this context, it is both intriguing and frustrating that, after more than a century of comparative AA studies, scholars have yet to present an explicitly justified and comprehensive internal genetic classification of the phylum (see Sidwell 2009 for a general discussion). For sure, there are various proposals in print, and in unpublished sources such as disser- tations, conference presentations, and manuscripts circulating informally. But when these dis- parate sources are tracked down, compared, and analysed, it becomes abundantly clear that there is no scholarly consensus on: — the relations between AA branches, — the age or diversity of AA, — an appropriate program for addressing these issues Consequently, the field is yet to significantly benefit from multidisciplinary research.
    [Show full text]