DESIGN and PROJECT REVIEW COMMITTEE (DAPR) Wednesday, September 12, 2018 2:30 P.M

Home , Dempster Street, Wacker Drive

DESIGN AND PROJECT REVIEW COMMITTEE (DAPR) Wednesday, September 12, 2018 2:30 P.M. Lorraine H. Morton Civic Center, 2100 Ridge Avenue, Room 2404

AGENDA

I. CALL TO ORDER/DECLARATION OF QUORUM, JOHANNA LEONARD, CHAIR

II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: August 29, 2018, DAPR Committee meetings

III. NEW BUSINESS

1. 2929 Central Street Preliminary and Final Approval Charles Cook, architect, submits for exterior remodeling of the front façade, Normandy Remodeling, in the B1a Business District and the oCSC Central Street Overlay District.

2. 1919 Dempster Street Recommendation to ZBA James Olguin, attorney, submits for a special use permit for the expansion of a Type 2 Restaurant, McDonald’s Restaurant, and a special use permit for the expansion of a Drive-Through Facility in the C2 Commercial District.

IV. ADJOURNMENT

The next DAPR meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, September 19, 2018, at 2:30 pm in Room 2404 of the Lorraine H. Morton Civic Center.

DRAFT-NOT APPROVED

DESIGN AND PROJECT REVIEW COMMITTEE (DAPR) MINUTES August 29, 2018

Voting Members Present: I. Eckersberg, D. Cueva, M. Tristan, G. Gerdes, J. Leonard, S. Mangum, K. Jensen, L. Biggs, M. Griffith

Staff Present: J. Velan, J. Nelson

Others Present:

Presiding Member: J. Leonard

A quorum being present, Ms. Leonard called the meeting to order at 2:33pm.

Approval of Minutes

August 15, 2018, and August 29, 2018, DAPR committee meeting minutes.

Mr. Gerdes made a motion to approve both sets of minutes, seconded by Ms. Biggs.

The Committee voted, 7-0, with two abstentions, to approve the minutes of August 15, 2018, and August 29, 2018.

Old Business

1. 2415 Wade Street Recommendation to ZBA Phillip Kupritz, applicant, applies for major zoning relief to construct a 1-car attached garage, a rear addition and deck to an existing single-family residence in the R2 Single-Family Residential District. The applicant requests building lot coverage of 50% where 40% is permitted, to reduce the minimum required front yard setback from 25.9’ to 19.8’, to reduce the required west interior side yard setback from 5’ to 0’ and to reduce the required east interior side yard setback from 5’ to 2.9’, to reduce the required off-street parking from 2 spaces to 1 space for a single-family residence.

APPLICATION PRESENTED BY: Matt Kupritz, applicant, architect Nicole Pinkard, property owner

DISCUSSION: ● M. Kupritz discussed an alternative plan that removes the side porch. He stated this plan eliminates the central entry location desired by the owner, requires removing a desirable window at the first floor and takes away from living space since a bedroom would need to be relocated. ● M. Kupritz stated the proposed plan has the main living areas at the back of the home with two bedrooms at the front away from the living area. He stated the 1st floor

1 DRAFT-NOT APPROVED

bedrooms are for one live-in parent and a guest room for a parent who visits. He stated the bedrooms need to be ADA accessible. ● M. Kupritz discussed a second alternative which provided an open parking pad in the west side yard instead of the attached garage. He stated this option has the entry on the west side, keeps the side porch and allows two bedrooms at the front of the home. ● N. Pinkard stated the goal is for two bedrooms on the 1st floor. She stated the parking pad works but a garage is preferred. ● M. Kupritz stated the open parking pad includes a wall to screen the parking and trash container. ● N. Pinkard stated they are working with the Park Dept. to provide a library or equipment storage at the back of the garage. ● S. Mangum asked if one of the bedrooms could be relocated away from the front. ● M. Kupritz stated the existing stairs is an obstacle, creates long narrow spaces. He stated a bedroom could be moved but it is not an ideal plan. ● S. Mangum questioned the setback at the proposed kitchen. ● M. Kupritz stated the existing garage foundation will be used, noting a variation had been granted for that setback. He stated the setback could be increased but they are trying to salvage the existing foundation. ● Discussion that locating both bedrooms next to the bathroom would help with resale. ● M. Kupritz stated that would not be practical since it would create long, narrow living space. ● S. Mangum noted the open parking pad would trigger additional variations, asked if that would reduce building lot coverage. ● M. Griffith stated even though it would still count towards building lot coverage, it may reduce it. ● M. Griffith noted the application requested building lot coverage of 50% but his review noted the plan is less than that, noting the applicant’s number includes a rear porch which is not part of the plan. ● N. Pinkard stated she is not willing to remove the side porch. ● J. Leonard stated this is a challenging case given the ADA needs. She stated she sees the benefit to the garage, stated having both bedrooms near the bathroom is a better design. ● S. Mangum asked if a chair lift would be feasible to access the 2nd floor. ● N. Pinkard stated it would be difficult to transition between a wheelchair and the lift.

L. Biggs made a motion to recommend approval to ZBA, seconded by J. Leonard.

The Committee voted, 5-4, to recommend approval to the ZBA.

New Business

1. 1427 Chicago Avenue Sign Variation Jim Moore, applicant, First Presbyterian Church, submits for a sign variation for (1) 4’-0” high by 5’-6” wide internally illuminated commercial variable message sign (CVSM) to replace a

2 DRAFT-NOT APPROVED manually changed outdoor reader board where CVSM signs displaying messages other than time and temperature are prohibited by sign regulations, in the R5 General Residential District.

APPLICATION PRESENTED BY: Jim Moore, applicant

DISCUSSION: ● J. Moore stated the sign has already been installed, apologized for not first obtaining a permit, stated there was confusion on their end. He stated the sign replaced an illuminated sign. ● G. Gerdes stated the applicant was informed the type of sign was not permitted, stated staff is recommending denial. He stated the Preservation Commission recommended approval. He stated this is the same type of sign and variation requested by Citgo that was denied. He stated Citgo is appealing that decision to the City Council. He stated there is not aldermanic support for these types of signs. ● J. Leonard stated the concern is that these types of signs can cause confusion with traffic lights.

L. Biggs made a motion to deny the sign variation, seconded by G. Gerdes.

The Committee voted, 9-0, to deny the sign variation.

2. 523-525 Howard Street Preliminary and Final Review Van Pham, applicant, submits for building permit to install awnings and to renovate the existing open parking lot, Vision 20/20, in the B3 Business District.

APPLICATION PRESENTED BY: Van Pham, applicant

DISCUSSION: ● V. Pham stated they are installing new awnings that replace ones installed in 2011 that were worn. He stated the parking lot will be resurfaced. ● G. Gerdes stated signage requires a separate permit. ● S. Mangum stated there is a lot of unused pavement in the parking lot. ● J. Leonard asked if the ADA space could be located closer to the building. ● S. Mangum stated since there is not enough space for double row of parking, there is space to add landscaping. ● J. Leonard stated landscaping and a separated walk from the public sidewalk to the building entrance would be desirable. ● S. Mangum noted the awning can be approved, the applicant can return at a later date with parking lot landscaping details.

G. Gerdes made a motion to grant preliminary and final approval for the awnings, seconded by L. Biggs.

The Committee voted, 9-0, to grant preliminary and final approval for the awnings.

3 DRAFT-NOT APPROVED

Parking lot plan is held in Committee in order to allow the applicant to provide landscape details.

3. 2626 Reese Avenue Recommendation to ZBA Bill James, property owner, submits for major zoning relief to construct a single family residence with a one-car detached garage and one open parking space, with 42.5% building lot coverage where 30% is allowed, a 3' south interior side yard setback for the principal structure where 5' is required, a 3.5' street side yard (Reese) setback for the principal structure where 15' is required, and a 10' street side yard setback for a detached garage, 1' street side yard setback for open parking, and an 8.5' street side yard setback for a deck where 15' is required for accessory structures, in the R1 Single Family Residential District.

APPLICATION PRESENTED BY: Bill James, property owner

DISCUSSION: ● B. James stated this plan incorporates comments from the ZBA, smaller house, 1-car garage. ● D. Cueva noted the 1st, 2nd and basement labels need to be corrected on the plans. ● B. James stated the basement is 90% below grade. He stated the gambrel roof pulls the mass away from the property. ● G. Gerdes asked about building height and if building lot coverage increased. ● B. James stated the proposed roof minimizes the building bulk, and confirmed building lot coverage increased. ● S. Mangum stated the open parking pad counts toward building lot coverage per the zoning code. ● G. Gerdes cautioned that a soil study should be done to verify is a basement is feasible related to the water table. ● G. Gerdes asked about shoring between the existing residence and proposed construction. ● B. James stated steel will be used, that required shoring will be done. ● I. Eckersberg stated shoring will also be required along the street right-of-way due to the proximity. ● G. Gerdes stated it is preferred to locate the window well to the rear. ● B. James stated the proposed rear deck may conflict. ● D. Cueva asked where downspouts will be directed. ● B. James stated he will work with the City, but could consider directing downspouts to the area under the deck and establish a splash pad. ● S. Mangum asked if he had spoken with neighbors. ● B. James stated no. ● S. Mangum stated variations are needed to build on this property due to the lot size, plan is responsive to many concerns expressed at previous ZBA meeting.

S. Mangum made a motion to recommend approval to the ZBA, seconded by L. Biggs.

4 DRAFT-NOT APPROVED

The Committee voted, 8-1, to recommend approval to the ZBA.

Adjournment

L. Biggs made a motion to adjourn, seconded by S. Mangum. The Committee voted, 9-0, to adjourn. Meeting adjourned at 3.47pm.

The next DAPR meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, September 5, 2018, at 2:30 pm in Room 2404 of the Lorraine H. Morton Civic Center.

Respectfully submitted, Michael Griffith

Design and Project Review (DAPR)

2929 Central St. Normandy Remodeling

Preliminary/Final Review 2929 Central St.

May 18, 2018 1:1,000 0 0.0075 0.015 0.03 mi User drawn points 0 0.0125 0.025 0.05 km Tax Parcels City of Evanston IL, Imagery courtesy Cook County GIS

Copyright 2018 City of Evanston This map is not a plat of survey. This map is provided "as is" without warranties of any kind. See www.cityofevanston.org/mapdisclaimers.html for more information. 2929 Central St.

May 18, 2018 1:1,000 0 0.0075 0.015 0.03 mi User drawn points 0 0.0125 0.025 0.05 km Zoning Boundaries & Labels City of Evanston IL, Imagery courtesy Cook County GIS Tax Parcels Copyright 2018 City of Evanston This map is not a plat of survey. This map is provided "as is" without warranties of any kind. See www.cityofevanston.org/mapdisclaimers.html for more information. 2929 Central St.

T C B I D D I f F F P P D L n o H o u i i o i u r r f e L s s m e i I o e

r t t r l l n I l S a a i d r p p m d p N v e n n m

i a a P o n w e O c c a D r a r R s r g e e e

t I e t e c y a s s s

i O S L d a o : o : t n a _

D F l n i _ e n

M l n n o f _ :

s _

E o a p e t d h _ t _ I _ e r r s t o S

e _ N _ d a u e _

: i r S & _ n _ n _ : I c _ e h I M _ _ M t t _ g _ o

_ O e i s E C _ _ o l n _ _

_ r U e o N o _ a O _ n e _ _ e _ s i n r s M o _ _ , A s n

_ _ _

c e m t

n _ u _ _ g _ t n N g L m _ t B

r _ n S a _ . r _ _ a a o _

o e a o S o _ y l T _ 3 _ r t g _ _ e n

u v l E n e _ 1 A _ s n s _ e _

t 40.0

n . L u s d _ , s R _ i o

_ N _ _

n / 7 d

f _ 2 t _ p a

p _ V _ _ f D &

S , _ r 0 b i _ p f e w

_ _ _ I c 2 e o a A r e r _ 1 _

C _ _ i _ e

p P 0 i

l e _ 7 R t _ G a o _ t e _ E _ e i n 1 D

_ t _ s r a _ D _ r _ l t r 7 6 s

_ t C e _

n F _ t _ _ u o y n S o . , _ _ d 8 _ O _

_ m u o

i c _

F 16.0 _ c 5 _ f _ _ r d N o p

o e _ _

_ O _ p e _ r g d n F _ _ r c n _ _ _ R u

s o _ i b _ O e _ _ _ t m a

v r y _ r _ _ A _ R _ r i u s C a _ _ d a s _ _

_ M c l n B c e _ n _ s t _ a d o i . t O E S o e l . t i e

n e U n T d d . N g N O . S . Story Brick D 1-3 e

P T t T r A

H P o Retail & Residential Building " P R M p E R 1 o a e Y A

v S 7 r r C 0 C

G e & . t S e . t 3 . A y o U 9 m 0 "

U r

i 1 n

O 9 v C

R 2 N c R e W c i n o S

L H c

R a N r n W o V r

e e o i L t n E o l

E t u e

i P e a r e i n N t s n t Y r t o

h e h t C

T W . l H e u

r b i n 6.85 106.35 W g H W 111.63 5 H .9 W a

125.00 0 8 W t H 7 0 e . A 0 R Rec. & Meas. r . . 8 0 s 2 H o

V W a C p 1 3 3

o a E t u h .

l 0 a W N E 2

P t v a H C L

s a 2 e o C r l o a t 8

s H t o

r r t W S

t p t p o P h o

e s i a u s W s r H v

t t

0 y N h H e

W . m o C 4 M 7

t o 0 c e

e W r

n H n E t

H a t e a

i 8 W

n l r s

S t

F i (

N W g 8 a H P r

n H E

l W k a 4 n r o

g o t E S o 7 n r e x e y W h f H t r ) H r v

a W 6 e a i 4 u c 0 s 2 g s e t . L 4 0 t s

A o . e P W C P 7 2

F H H 6

t . i h W o w 7 a o r l . R 1 l 9 - C n

e e n i O 6 n

. n o o 9

r 1 i a 5 4 W m

t H c 4 S a H n W F k o " l 1

C N m i d g r ' p .

s 0 e y o 0 A D

e . h a n

. B . r D

t # e l 2 c e L r W C H o

s i i 9 0 1 i r W a c o M

W v

N H 2 . A L i k 4 l 1 g L C i t

i 5 r s S 7 e B n L o & s 0 n -

e Gravel 2 u r n i

S W S H E H o

e A

c S 9 i o o i 2 l F - N ey

r All d

U n u d t : f w e T

i t 1 N i 8 t i

, r h R W n 1 e n n H a

S 0

g H o 2 m e i W V n i W t

" L n

n r o A

o 6 E a , t = W t N u

. H

g t l

Y k 15.94 i P E

h 2 n o h H

@ u 1 r W P f C 8 Refuse . W b H e

C / 6 i s l

U o 1 e , i v Area c S

o b 2 ' A l

m 8 B b R H

5 W c o o d e H W m o . 4 1 L g O , k u 4

t y o . . I " l

I A W t

0 W H C h C l C n o C s h H , . 0 W l o p o b l e i

n h M i n 6 y n

a W u c a

a H L 3 e r

c 9 l o l e n s 5 t k t 7. H a 1 S l . t

1 . W i 8 8 t t P t e n n l s u

S a y W 2 e o

q s d 2 v i R , g 6 L t e a w

u i o n o 5 H m l I v 0 t k W

o a V

M . M 1 n l a e R M f g

D e 0 5 l e e r

S , e n .

e d a 6 a i

9 c T t t n

p a

s 0 i . I s D H e o . n s = B 3 W 0 o 0 2 . r s : 2 2 U r . 2 . a

1 A i

3 i

. 0 0 t L W 6 0 w s

7 o T 7 . E 0 0 o 6 2 A 2 M r e . E . 0 y D H 4 L r s 0 3.32 f W 0 9 o p .53 S

85 . w h G

.20 G 1

. 14 S 2 T F 1 a 8.78 n l e 8 s l E 5 a H A t 8 C p

c e g

a a a rbin W ncrete Cu

S " Co

M N 10 D A

R c g p p

R P o e x - d p n

t o r r L

S t A 2 P R a r u a a e j p

o o CAR d u L T t o P o i

T o a t t e v c T l p i p

9 o e n i i l o f e c A h t s S A ncrete Median

e Co H e e n c

i E N t . u W m t o n d e e

, = r r a y o h 2 i / W

D r s C t t f n A L i

a 2 b

u e e y y m o e

o g 4 I n t 3 l 0 : N C r

n m n f e t h e f a s l

0 d t l p s d S p C H 3 a r n i n e D , z . W t n r e e e 0 M A t

o r n o

s e O D e o ,

t r c o a u i t n t p o C p

s p h o i

s i r c

c PORT A T f a i r k i r s

e A n S

e d t n g i e t

s s o W

a c o o

r u s H

r p s M } s n g W v p } t a d u e

b h

r s C l y h w

e h i a

S a l e l e d

a o b a N d l a i

n a l f s S d y

r t n c e l n S r o t w n d te Curbing d " Concre S 10 P c

d h t c e

C P d 3 r s H o

d a e T s P r t

l a i u e 1 b v n C e

d r o h v v

r t e S i r s r , t t y e o r h n c b o e m i c e i

2 m a f e a

s e i i g

p n r p

e e i n n e 0 G i

t e

i e u I u n e t n n i o H p g i f b 1

n u r s o t W o f l 2 b 4 a c n t

r t e o 7

a t e n 0 t o l r t n g d c T l , c t h i 2 e o

1 p i r c e

o t L r n a

i e a

1 E e , 2 n f o o s

a t g t H L c r , N

W t e

i n v n t o t

h r t 3 f a m t o y L h t

e g d h o m a s t

e e h l p r t

e L i B h d r n

t e e r e n

L s u o e H n e s o o t

e W s d e s f a

s t v u E s h t b i s g a e n t e n a

A n

e s o a

t , o m d n e o o e s d f l

f L

d t f

e a R a H

9 o D n t

a o Ft. Metal Sign 16 n t h L r l t f e h l d h a e f i , ,

t e e g e

E t s e s j e h

h n y o r s , I c l 1 r

p s Y e a i

i l i S r w I R _ e g f s H s , n s r n 0 n i W o

i l

p s a e a o p i n e c

d r n

t g i _ t , l S p s e r o

n i k

i A a g i o r o e 1 r e s s n w 1 t n

f r o t _ n h L b i T H e f d e S U t 3 a f d W 1

o o ( y u T r s i i i t a T y

e c 2 s c a _ r w s R i , i A y b a

s 2 d n l a a t i 5

p L a . a d e n , o o n

/ t t E

c . L o _ i

A n 0 i i 2 e p n

v c d n o l H o E n t o a d 2 u a W a e a y a C

f n R n g n w d , _ l v d l s I h ) o S , s d

E e ( l e i

k t

t e l y t a t M h d o s h _ i S 1 h n r )

n n

e r T H e

u e i

o a

W o o D i

A d 2

a t L r

o A r

n s _ s r e w

i s A V v e l

t s s u f n e a W m (

p p

l r l

p p e a

i a h i r n ; e r u u _ a

i h y r n s c

a a v t s ) t d e

d a t r p c o h H

l c , e vision Line h l Denotes Lot Di

1 l t W g s h p t

t k

p t r

_ o u y h a T

u P s T e , E e o P l

N , r e r e a n e

i r i , 2

s a h d e c

t v t d _

d R

o e v i , l h e s x a a n

e T s e e ;

. m u C 3 H e

. a m n b p

W f _

h 3 o a S , u r e c o O l a c

s e C 5 v n e n Y n r 4 u t i r

e n a r b

- e t l

r _ t , m d t k r l o

l 2 s m o i

y w o a n v 7

d i o 2

t a u n c w e g e m _ s ( i h n 3

2 t t a

a y a g L n

h i 9 s 2 a b

e s H t o ) o

0 1

W i t _ e a d (

. a c t t °

n o "

" b

E i t 2 r o s

y n n

h M l 1 5 e

u x a n a _

' g

e a 0 T ) p

n r o n t i ( "

s a e n H . h p p f c d d _

W ; m i 1 ) i r e a

v n m , b a n 1 o

v i e i _ u 8 e l s - p o n e

u s. n Rec. & Mea l 3 i n l ,

e r d b g i

m t o 0 _ 9 e d r s ,

l l Sign 14 Ft. Meta o t -

t f m e e ,

h Traffic Signal d 2 y w 125.00 v

r 1 t _ 0 e e a e i h s t e i n 1 d r 1 a r n s i r a

g , l i

8 i _ n d e m

a n m c t n 1

d g Concrete Parkin a p o ( m r a 4 e u a i te Walk t ncre Co P P e t S ) t d , o e B m r 8 a Bumper (Typical) t c r a i e

d 1 e t f d o n a d . o c h v t

r 7

b c s e e

e r p D " s i 5 a , e k e d u s r m M

u U i

t o 1 t e r E e n S S i f o b M i b t t A a e l t n 9 l d d f i y o o E C f d a a o l l n i u G a

3 , g i

i u u a 3 a e C u i C i c T t t o e c l t c " e n a l y 5 h t t t s s 3 p t r k u o a

d h a c h

n N t R g r " e . o r C r

t s

o t 0

L o i p f b n h o p s d a a f e e r g f g r o r

r e n o i l i a n m W q T i o h d c l c r 2 a o s r s

P d t r

u r o P k a i

t 0 i v C s a e a Concrete Curbing n

t n l e i u n r 1

i o n s ( f h o l

a r N o s k f r a

t n . c f V n e t ( i e t s i 9 r p o

s )

o e a a d m i t w u a e 9 s t

r s

n s o C a u c o

c w r n

u a w e 0 E t h f l o s n l s t t d y n y r

i u .

a h n h T d 0 t

a i v ;

t L h n s r t Asphalt Pavement t i o

s 2 e n a r h c i t t e o

n o w h y W

t b d f h s e t h l e

o h a

n c

a f e c e s m r t e E o r

o u

b k r o A x t " A C r a v h r

t y r m m 5 M h y , e

v E e L DRIV e e LINCOLNWOOD Center Line of 66 Ft. Public R.O.W. M i .

n e n a

e c 0 T a a i s l y d n f a t n o

t d a A a l F : e t n d y o c i v i e p t d A m / d

a . t n e r A

( s s R

N s t r z u h l i C w T

s a a ) o o m o o

e n n S h p

n f w . l

d d y M u i R

1 A r c s o

r o e 7 a

r o h n f

s t c d e L 0

f h t

u g a o h f : s i 3 a

e t e C l a l t r J e

1 e l r

n c i d n T

t r e , i s

i t o d

c C

t r m

D a t

t t b

t t h t a i T

i f i P o p a 0 t i o f f a l l s i l i r s 2 e

e n t n t t y a o o e l c a h 5

t r d t v t t n a 3 e o a

i e o : o e

S n

w r a : A A F m f t

e u e g

h B

s e R G L r o c , , r

h C e i e

r e t u c A T f v n a a e n h

o W e c h u p e y F H

s n n t

t l e w Z o h i y m e

r s r l P L d d d c L

r B a

o s r o n p e o o e a

r a e d a , . O c p C H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n r ; 1 u f " r o g n p g t ; 3 d y o e 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 e e ;

. t O i l . a . . t . . p ...... a r o

1 e H

. . t . . . . h j ...... r o l . p h

d ------t . S . . . l ...... o . h z o " d e

. h . . . t 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ...... D e s e a : T . ( ...... R . y a a t X p i r

a . . A . . . i ...... u 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 e x r a

. . . . A . t n ...... ; n r P d i t e l ...... t .

t e

------" ) . . r t . . . n d C . u . a ...... y R a t p y . . r g . . . . t ...... i . l 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 A

t g e P . l ...... n h ) e A c d o g

t . d ( . . h . . . O . r . y ......

E 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 = . . . . . u . y ...... = A d a

. R o a E C u e n 4 B T R B a S A G D E F S e P

e a L R I 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8

T e R l s r p

l p s r l i a q l u t s u t e a . 2 a r a r e e e n K a o 1 ------F e s E n t p r N e

d h E a t e e p t u f f r i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 h T r s 5 p r e x q c t o t c f 0 d c f e f r n i k s a i G r a 1 e I . f

e t a 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . a a A a e a , t e n a e u d h o , S I l i t S ' r c i 0 N r C b 9

9 d c T a l t n 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 l y t r l c o s

u c F i E P i i p e

o l o

d P L c e 1 p B

c o l , r 9 S s

g r L u ------t G r f S F n r i o e I

i i S N

e 1 i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n a a e 2 B s 6 i B g C e v u s S i d p r C i a r s g E M M d m n g t p h

s c i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 s

c h 0 r e

o o o e D t s e e t c e S d h i e S v

r i n M y A e g a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e e t l n 0 t x n x n d e r a

e i e t i o r a q

o a q s s v d c n t r c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 C n

n n t s T p e t A M i h r a . l d e h e e e

4 i . c ) i e i

d t a r

m t o g c s o D F o o . e I

e s F e c e . W P

n O s . c n n r

e w o t s t d t ; a t f M o e i o 2 e d . s i q a e w

. o N o l

r n o s o r

b r

d e e u n n n r F n a t

F d n f y s t

a d s 8 o d l f e P S

b o e w p l u r A

t o r o u e u

e l o o e r s p i o L l g r

4 i e t d u t e f t l h w v h r N T t e d e r e e

e v d , e A i o a s y 1 n r e t o

s l . , , b g l

f a

t t y

s h o - t n

e R y t e

e 14' - 0" 6' - 0" 8' - 0" 15' - 4" 7' - 11" 4' - 11"

2' - 0" 125.00

E E 7.83' 111.63' E E

NEW COVERED ENTRANCE

1' - 2" 4.41' 3.42' 25.02'

2' - 7" 1 STORY BRICK BUILDING 60.03' 25.02' 5' - 0" 7' - 0" 15' - 10"

15.94' 25.02'

E 35.85' 1 STORY BRICK BUILDING TO REMAIN (EXISTING TENANT) 25.02' 200.18

G G BANK DRIVE THRU TO 6' PARKWAY/ REMAIN (EXISTING TENANT) STREET PUBLIC ALLEY

25.02' FURNITURE ZONE

CENTRAL STREET 8' SIDEWALK CLEAR ZONE

25.02' 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 200.18

20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 25.02' 25.02' 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

125.00

LINCOLNWOOD DRIVE

ALL DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE LAYOUTS ARE SUBJECT TO REVISION NORMANDY REMODELING SITE PLAN 150 NORTH WACKER DRIVE, SUITE 2360 2929 CENTRAL STREET CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60606 312.846.6292 2018.08.24 EVANSTON, IL 60201 0' 4' 8' 16' E 122 123 ROOM BREAK 2018.08.24 1/8" = 1'-0" = 1/8" VESTIBULE 125 124 121 8' STORAGE I.T. ROOM DESIGNERS 4' 2' 0'

E 120 MEN PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN

E 118

E CONFERENCE 119 WOMEN 117 DISPLAY KITCHEN 6 114 BUILDING MATERIALS 116 SEMINAR 115 PLUMBING 113 DISPLAY KITCHEN 5 107 MEETING 2 MEETING EVANSTON, IL 60201 2929 CENTRAL 2929 STREET CENTRAL NORMANDY REMODELING 111 112 106 STONE CABINETRY TILE/FLOORING 108 MEETING 1 104 BAR COFFEE 105 110 RECEPTION 109 BATH DISPLAY MASTER KITCHEN 4 DISPLAY 101 102 103 100 312.846.6292 DISPLAY DISPLAY DISPLAY KITCHEN 2 KITCHEN 1 KITCHEN 3 ENTRANCE ALL DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE ARE DIMENSIONS ALL REVISION TO SUBJECT ARE LAYOUTS 2360 DRIVE, SUITE 150 NORTH WACKER CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60606 ILLINOIS CHICAGO, 1 SD-23 EXISTING COPING SIGNAGE

EXISTING MASONRY PAINTED WOOD SHIPLAP FACADE TO BE PROJECTION PAINTED/STAINED WHITE GLASS/STEEL CANOPY OVERHANG

NEW EX

PREFINISHED BLACK ALUMINUM PREFINISHED BLACK ALUMINUM EXISTING SIGNAGE TO REMAIN DOOR FRAME STOREFRONT FRAME GOOSENECK LIGHTS W/ PAINTED WOOD SHIPLAP PILASTERS BLACK ALUMINUM FINISH EXISTING STOREFRONT TO REMAIN

1 SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION SD-4 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"

ALL DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE LAYOUTS ARE SUBJECT TO REVISION NORMANDY REMODELING SOUTH ELEVATION 150 NORTH WACKER DRIVE, SUITE 2360 2929 CENTRAL STREET 1/8" = 1'-0" CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60606 312.846.6292 2018.08.24 EVANSTON, IL 60201 0' 2' 4' 8' 1' - 10"

2' - 9" 8"

8" 6 7/8" 6 1/8"

PAINTED WOOD SHIPLAP PILASTER

RECESSED PUSH BUTTON WITH JUNCTION BOX 14' - 81/2" 1' - 10"

8' SIDEWALK CLEAR ZONE/14' OBSTRUCTION FREE ZONE 11" 11" 12' - 10 1/2" 10 - 12'

2 SD-23 2 ENLARGED COLUMN DETAIL SD-23SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"

6' - 0" 8' - 0" PARKWAY/STREET FURNITURE ZONE SIDEWALK CLEAR ZONE 14' - 0" OBSTRUCTION FREE ZONE

1 ENLARGED ENTRANCE PLAN SD-23SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" ALL DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE LAYOUTS ARE SUBJECT TO REVISION NORMANDY REMODELING ENTRANCE DETAILS 150 NORTH WACKER DRIVE, SUITE 2360 2929 CENTRAL STREET As indicated CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60606 312.846.6292 2018.06.20 EVANSTON, IL 60201 1' - 10" ALL DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE LAYOUTS ARE SUBJECT TO REVISION NORMANDY REMODELING ENTRANCE PERSPECTIVE

150 NORTH WACKER DRIVE, SUITE 2360 2929 CENTRAL STREET 2018.08.24 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60606 312.846.6292 EVANSTON, IL 60201

Design and Project Review (DAPR)

1919 Dempster St. McDonald’s Restaurant

Recommendation to ZBA

My Map

September 23, 2015 1:1,000 0 0.0075 0.015 0.03 mi Tax Parcels 0 0.0125 0.025 0.05 km

Copyright 2015 City of Evanston This map is not a plat of survey. This map is provided "as is" without warranties of any kind. See www.cityofevanston.org/mapdisclaimers.html for more information. My Map

September 23, 2015 1:2,000 0 0.015 0.03 0.06 mi Zoning Boundaries & Labels 0 0.0275 0.055 0.11 km Tax Parcels

9575 West Higgins Road, Suite 400 | Rosemont, Illinois 60018 p: 847-518-9990 | f: 847-518-9987

MEMORANDUM TO: Jeffery Miller Watermark Engineering Resources, Ltd.

FROM: Michael K. Scavo Consultant

Luay R. Aboona, PE Principal

DATE: April 5, 2016

SUBJECT: Traffic Count Summary McDonald’s Restaurant Evanston, Illinois

This memorandum summarizes the results of a traffic count conducted by Kenig, Lindgren, O’Hara, Aboona, Inc. (KLOA, Inc.) for the existing McDonald’s restaurant located at 1919 Dempster Street in Evanston, Illinois. The site is located on Dempster Street between the signalized intersections of Dempster Street with Dodge Avenue and the Evanston Plaza access drive (See Figure 1).

The restaurant is located on the north side of Dempster Street and provides a single drive- through lane with double drive-through windows and 60 off-street parking spaces. The site currently provides three access drives: one inbound-only access drive on Dempster Street, one outbound-only access drive on Dempster Street, and one full access drive on Dodge Avenue. On-site circulation around the building is restricted to one-way counter-clockwise travel with the auxiliary parking lot off Dodge Avenue allowing for two-way traffic.

The purpose of this memorandum was to summarize the results of the traffic counts conducted at the outbound-only access drive on Dempster Street to determine the direction of travel as well as whether any traffic re-entered the site at the inbound-only access drive.

KLOA, Inc. Transportation and Parking Planning Consultants Aerial View of Site Figure 1

2 McDonald’s Site Observations

Observations were conducted from 7:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. on Friday, February 16, 2016 of the two access drives on Dempster Street and the drive-through operation. The results of the traffic counts are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 EVANSTON MCDONALD’S OUTBOUND ACCESS DRIVE COUNTS U-Turn into Site U-Turn into Site Time Right-Turn Out Left-Turn Out Using Westbound Using Westbound Left-Turn Lane Through Lanes 7:00 A.M. 62 36 0 0 8:00 A.M. 76 52 2 0 9:00 A.M. 69 47 3 1 10:00 A.M. 45 34 1 1 11:00 A.M. 50 34 1 1 12:00 P.M. 68 49 2 0 1:00 P.M. 48 50 1 1 2:00 P.M. 44 33 1 0 3:00 P.M. 43 22 0 2 4:00 P.M. 46 24 0 0 5:00 P.M. 48 28 0 0 Total 599 409 11 6

The following is a summary of the counts and observations:

• The outbound access drive on Dempster Avenue was observed to carry 128 trips during the morning peak hour, 119 trips during the midday peak hour, and 76 trips during the evening peak hour.

• The majority of the exiting traffic utilized the drive-through lane. 78 vehicles (61%) during the morning peak hour, 82 vehicles (69%) during the midday peak hour, and 52 vehicles (68%) during the evening peak hour were observed to utilize the drive-through.

• The maximum drive-through lane queue was observed to be nine vehicles in the morning peak hour, eight vehicles during the midday peak hour, and eight vehicles during the evening peak hour. The maximum storage available from the ordering board to Dempster Street was observed to be approximately eight vehicles in length.

• The drive-through queue was observed to extend back onto Dempster Avenue on five occasions during the morning peak period, three times during the midday peak period, and twice during the evening peak period.

3 • Vehicles were observed to cut through the McDonald’s site during all three peak hours. This cut-through maneuver involved vehicles entering on the Dodge Avenue access drive, traveling around the site, and turning right onto Dempster Street at the outbound access drive, bypassing the signalized intersection at Dempster Street and Dodge Avenue. This was observed to occur five times during the morning peak hour, three times during the midday peak hour, and two times during the evening peak hour.

• Vehicles entering from Dodge Avenue were observed multiple times during all three peak hours to go the wrong way down the inbound access drive aisle in order to enter the drive-through lane.

• Vehicles were observed entering the McDonald’s outbound-only access drive a total of seven times during the observations.

• The site does not provide an efficient way to circulate around the site without traffic re- entering Dempster Street. Vehicles were observed exiting the site and turning left to re- enter the site 17 times during the observations. Of these, 11 vehicles entered the westbound left-turn lane for the Evanston Plaza access drive to wait to re-enter the McDonald’s site. The 6 remaining vehicles were observed driving the wrong way on Dempster Street to re-enter the McDonald’s site.

• The current drive-through orientation makes it difficult for vehicles entering from Dodge Avenue to enter the drive-through queue, resulting in these vehicles circulating the site unnecessarily, going the wrong way down the inbound drive, or cutting into the drive-through queue and blocking non-drive-through traffic inbound from Dempster Street in the process.

Circulation

The results of the counts and observations clearly indicate that the current access and circulation system is not adequate in accommodating traffic that desires to recirculate on-site. In order to alleviate this condition and mitigate the unsafe conditions resulting from site traffic recirculating via Dempster Street, the proposed site plan calls for the provision of a drive aisle on the south side of the building to allow for traffic to recirculate on-site. This will make the site more efficient and safe for the customers of the restaurant as well as the traffic on Dempster Street.

August 20, 2018

Melissa Klotz Planning and Zoning Division Community Development Department City of Evanston 2100 Ridge Avenue Evanston, IL 60201

RE: McDonald’s – 1919 Dempster Street Evanston, Illinois

Dear Melissa:

Enclosed along with this letter are the plans for the major remodel and reconfiguration of the drive- thru at the existing McDonald’s located at 1919 Dempster Street. The plans show the addition of a side by side (dual) drive-thru in place of the current single lane drive-thru. This letter is meant to provide a better understanding of the benefits of the proposed drive-thru layout.

When considering the differences in drive-thru configurations (layouts) we look at the capacity of the configuration and its throughput (what we can consistently put through the drive-thru). There are multiple factors that contribute to this determination, but the location of the order point (where the customer places their order) and the number of orders (two versus one) that we can place at one time are the primary factors. We have been able to validate these numbers through a significant amount of experience and a large number of restaurants with each configuration. Consider each of these factors individually:

Location of the order point – Generally the further back we can place the order point the greater the capacity of the drive-thru and the better it functions. We measure this distance as the distance from the order point to the presenter’s window (where we present the food to the customer). The reason that this distance is important is that the sooner we can take the order the sooner the kitchen team can begin to make the food. Our simple goal is to have the order ready before the car gets to the presenter’s window. The sooner we can get the order taken the more likely this is to happen. The speed of the drive-thru and ultimately the throughput of the drive-thru is directly related to the speed of the kitchen. Giving the kitchen team a head start on the order helps to increase capacity as we can keep the wheels moving in the drive-thru.

Two at a time order taking – The single most time-consuming function in the drive-thru is taking the order. The complexity of the order (number of items/sandwiches in an order or the number of people the customer is ordering for) vary greatly and impact the time it takes to place an order. Having the ability to simultaneously take a second order reduces total order taking time and increases the capacity of the drive-thru. Consequently, the proposed plans provide for two order points to increase efficiency.

15 Salt Creek Lane, Suite 103 • Hinsdale, IL 60521 • Phone: (630) 244-6500 Fax: (630) 214-5440 • www.buikemalaw.com Melissa Klotz City of Evanston August 20, 2018 Page 2

Drive-thru capacity by configuration – the table below summarizes the hourly capacity of the different configurations. The 80% number is where the majority of restaurants actually perform and is a representation of throughput.

Configuration Capacity 80% Capacity Side by Side DT (two order points two DT lanes) 150 – 180 120 – 144 Single Speaker (one lane one order point - speaker) 100 – 120 80 – 96

Side by Side DT provides us with the greatest capacity and the greatest ability to put cars through the drive-thru (throughput). Two orders are taken simultaneously in two separate drive-thru lanes. The reasons for the increased capacity are that we can take multiple orders at one time as well as this configuration allows one lane to continue to move if a customer is taking a long time to order in the other lane. This configuration also helps with overall traffic flow on the lot as cars commit to one of the two lanes earlier which reduces the back up of a single lane.

Single Speaker – standard drive-thru configuration based on a sequential movement of cars. This is the drive-thru from the old days and we have been moving towards the dual order point configurations to increase throughput and handle customer demand. Today approximately 70% of the restaurants in the Chicago Region have either dual order point configurations.

In conclusion a Side by Side drive-thru proposed is clearly the best configuration for throughput and lot flow. In terms of throughput and traffic flow, it is far superior to any single lane by allowing cars to move through the site in a faster and more efficient manner. Based upon prior experience, we expect approximately a 50% increase in drive-thru capacity by making the proposed drive-thru changes.

Should you have any questions or need any additional information, please do not hesitate to call.

Sincerely,

James E. Olguin ELEVATION KEY NOTES: COLOR SCHEME: 'CRAFTSMEN' SCHEME

Fax: 815-369-4495 1860 W. Evans Ave. Lena, IL 61048 158

www.lingledesign.com 158 West Main Street Phone: 815-369-9155 LingleDesignGroup,Inc Englewood, CO 80110 Lingle Design Group,inc Design Lingle

T/ ARCADE T/ ARCADE ELEV. = + 19'-4" ELEV. = + 19'-4" T/ PARAPET T/ PARAPET ELEV. = + 18'-0" ELEV. = + 18'-0"

B/ METAL PANEL B/ METAL PANEL ELEV. = + 15'-9 1/4" ELEV. = + 15'-9 1/4"

B/ TRELLIS ELEV. = + 10'-11"

B/ DRIVE-THRU TRELLIS (UNDERSCORE) B/ TRELLIS ELEV. = + 9'-4" ELEV. = + 10'-8" ISSUED DATE: 04/04/2018 T/ WINDOW T/ WINDOW ELEV. = + 8'-7" ELEV. = + 8'-7"

T/ WINDOW SILL T/ WINDOW SILL ELEV. = + 2'-0" ELEV. = + 2'-0"

T/ SLAB T/ SLAB ELEV. = 0'-0" ELEV. = 0'-0" USA, LLC 1919 W. DEMPSTER 1 SOUTH ELEVATION EVANSTON, IL 60202 McDonald's A2.0 1/4" = 1'-0"

T/ ARCADE ELEV. = + 19'-4" T/ PARAPET T/ PARAPET ELEV. = + 18'-0" ELEV. = + 18'-0"

B/ METAL PANEL B/ METAL PANEL ELEV. = + 15'-9 1/4" ELEV. = + 15'-9 1/4" PERMIT REVIEW/ BID SET DESCRIPTION: BRAND REVIEW DATE: 04/04/2018 07/20/2017 # REVISIONS: B/ TRELLIS B/ TRELLIS ELEV. = + 9'-4" ELEV. = + 9'-4" STATE ID: 120362 T/ WINDOW NATIONAL #: 5377 ELEV. = + 8'-7" PROJECT NUMBER: 17-289 DRAWN BY: JAM CHECKED BY: CLL

SHEET TITLE:

T/ WINDOW SILL ELEV. = + 2'-0" EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS T/ SLAB T/ SLAB ELEV. = 0'-0" ELEV. = 0'-0"

SHEET NUMBER:

2 EAST ELEVATION A2.0 1/4" = 1'-0" A2.0 ELEVATION KEY NOTES: COLOR SCHEME: 'CRAFTSMEN' SCHEME T/ D.T. OPENING ELEV. + 8'-0" Fax: 815-369-4495 1860 W. Evans Ave. Lena, IL 61048 158 www.lingledesign.com 158 West Main Street Phone: 815-369-9155 LingleDesignGroup,Inc Englewood, CO 80110

T/ D.T. SILL ELEV. + 3'-0" Group,inc Design Lingle

T/ SLAB ELEV. = 0'-0" (RMHC) COIN COLLECTOR AT MASONRY

T/ ARCADE ELEV. = + 19'-4" T/ PARAPET T/ PARAPET ELEV. = + 18'-0" ELEV. = + 18'-0"

B/ METAL PANEL B/ METAL PANEL ELEV. = + 15'-9 1/4" ELEV. = + 15'-9 1/4"

B/ TRELLIS ELEV. = + 10'-11"

B/ DRIVE-THRU TRELLIS B/ TRELLIS (UNDERSCORE) ISSUED DATE: 04/04/2018 ELEV. = + 9'-4" ELEV. = + 10'-8"

T/ SLAB T/ SLAB ELEV. = 0'-0" ELEV. = 0'-0" USA, LLC 1919 W. DEMPSTER EVANSTON, IL 60202 1 NORTH ELEVATION McDonald's A2.1 1/4" = 1'-0"

T/ ARCADE ELEV. = + 19'-4" T/ PARAPET T/ PARAPET ELEV. = + 18'-0" ELEV. = + 18'-0"

B/ METAL PANEL B/ METAL PANEL ELEV. = + 15'-9 1/4" ELEV. = + 15'-9 1/4" PERMIT REVIEW/ BID SET DESCRIPTION: BRAND REVIEW

B/ TRELLIS B/ TRELLIS ELEV. = + 10'-11" ELEV. = + 10'-11" DATE: 04/04/2018 07/20/2017 #

B/ DRIVE-THRU TRELLIS REVISIONS: (UNDERSCORE) B/ TRELLIS ELEV. = + 10'-8" ELEV. = + 9'-4" STATE ID: 120362 NATIONAL #: 5377 PROJECT NUMBER: 17-289 DRAWN BY: JAM CHECKED BY: CLL

SHEET TITLE:

EXTERIOR

T/ SLAB ELEVATIONS ELEV. = 0'-0"

SHEET NUMBER:

2 WEST ELEVATION A2.1 1/4" = 1'-0" A2.1