DOCSLIB.ORG

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA § 319.56–20

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA § 319.56–20 Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA § 319.56–20 certification and reexamination at the exporting country on Honshu Island or port of departure prior to exportation. north thereof. (vi) Only the Tahiti Queen cultivar (xiii) Only precleared consignments and varieties which are at least 50 per- that have been treated with an ap- cent smooth Cayenne by lineage are proved treatment listed in 7 CFR part admissible. The importer or the im- 305 are authorized. The consignment porter’s agent must provide the inspec- must be accompanied by a PPQ Form tor with documentation that estab- 203 signed by the APHIS inspector on lishes the variety’s lineage. This docu- site in the exporting country. ment is necessary only with the first (xiv) Must be accompanied by a importation. phytosanitary certificate issued by the (vii) Prohibited from the Palestinian national plant protection organization controlled portions of the West Bank of Israel that declares ‘‘These tomatoes and Gaza Strip; otherwise, must be ac- were grown in registered greenhouses companied by a phytosanitary certifi- in the Arava Valley of Israel.’’ cate which declares that the melons (xv) Must be treated with an ap- were grown in approved areas in the proved treatment listed in 7 CFR part Arava Valley or the Kadesh–Barnea 305. area of Israel, the fields where the mel- (xvi) Must be accompanied by a ons were grown were inspected prior to phytosanitary certificate issued by the harvest, and the melons were inspected national plant protection organization prior to export and found free of pests. of the country of origin and with an ad- (viii) Prohibited from the Palestinian ditional declaration stating that the controlled portions of the West Bank fruit is free from Cnephasia jactatana, Coscinoptycha improbana, Ctenopseustis and Gaza Strip; otherwise must be ac- obliquana, Epiphyas postvittana, companied by a phytosanitary certifi- Pezothrips kellyanus, and Planotortrix cate which declares that only tomato excessana; must undergo a port of entry varieties 111, 121, 124, 139, and 144 are inspection with a biometric sampling included in the consignment and the of 100 percent of 30 boxes selected ran- tomatoes were packed into fruit-fly- domly from each consignment; and the proof containers within 24 hours after randomly selected boxes must be exam- harvesting. ined for hitchhiking pests. (ix) Except for sand pears entering (xvii) Must be accompanied by a Hawaii, only precleared consignments phytosanitary certificate issued by the are authorized. The consignment must national plant protection organization be accompanied by a PPQ Form 203 of the exporting country of origin with signed by the APHIS inspector on site an additional declaration stating that in the exporting country. the fruit is free of Conogethes (x) Must be accompanied by a punctiferalis, Cryptophlebia ombrodelta, phytosanitary certificate issued by the and Rhipiphorothrips cruentatus. national plant protection organization of the exporting country that includes (Approved by the Office of Management and a declaration certifying that the prod- Budget under control numbers 0579–0049, 0579–0236, 0579–0264, 0579–0316, and 0579–0351) ucts were grown and packed in the ex- porting country. [24 FR 10788, Dec. 29, 1959, as amended at 72 (xi) Must be accompanied by a FR 48547, Aug. 24, 2007; 73 FR 10972, Feb. 29, 2008; 74 FR 23611, May 20, 2009; 74 FR 56525, phytosanitary certificate issued by the Nov. 2, 2009] national plant protection organization of the exporting country that includes §§ 319.56–14—319.56–19 [Reserved] a declaration certifying that the prod- ucts were grown in a greenhouse in the § 319.56–20 Apples and pears from Aus- exporting country. tralia (including Tasmania) and (xii) Must be accompanied by a New Zealand. phytosanitary certificate issued by the Apples and pears from Australia (in- national plant protection organization cluding Tasmania) and New Zealand of the exporting country that includes may be imported only in accordance a declaration certifying that the prod- with this section and all other applica- ucts were grown in a greenhouse in the ble provisions of this subpart. 361 VerDate Nov<24>2008 14:05 Jan 29, 2010 Jkt 220016 PO 00000 Frm 00371 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\220016.XXX 220016 wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with CFR § 319.56–21 7 CFR Ch. III (1–1–10 Edition) (a) Inspection and treatment for pests of quirements of § 319.56–3. Upon entry the family Tortricidae. An inspector into the United States, such okra is must take a biometrically designed immediately subject to the require- sample from each lot of apples or pears ments of Subpart—Pink Bollworm that are offered for entry into the (§§ 301.52 through 301.52–10) of this chap- United States. If inspection of the sam- ter. ple discloses that pests of the family (b) Importations into areas south of the Tortricidae (fruit-leaf roller moths) are 38th parallel that are not pink bollworm not present in the lot sampled, the generally infested or suppressive areas. (1) fruit may be imported without treat- During December 1 through May 15, in- ment. If any such pests are found upon clusive, okra may be imported into inspection, the lot must be treated areas of Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, with methyl bromide as prescribed in Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, Ne- part 305 of this chapter. vada, North Carolina, South Carolina, (b) Treatment of apples and pears from Tennessee, or any part of Illinois, Ken- Australia for fruit flies. (1) Apples from tucky, Missouri, or Virginia south of Australia (including Tasmania) may be the 38th parallel subject to the require- imported without treatment for the ments of § 319.56–3. following fruit flies if they are im- (2) During May 16 through November ported from an area in Australia that 30, inclusive, okra may be imported meets the requirements of § 319.56–5 for into areas of Alabama, Arkansas, Flor- pest freedom: Mediterranean fruit fly ida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, (Ceratitis capitata), the Queensland fruit Nevada, North Carolina, South Caro- fly (Bactrocera tryoni), Bactrocera lina, Tennessee, or any part of Illinois, aquilonis, and B. neohumeralis. Kentucky, Missouri, or Virginia south (2) Pears from Australia (including of the 38th parallel if treated for the Tasmania) may be imported without pink bollworm in accordance with an treatment for the following fruit flies approved treatment listed in part 305 of if they are imported from an area in this chapter. Australia that meets the requirements of § 319.56–5 for pest freedom: Medi- (c) Importations into areas north of the terranean fruit fly (Ceratitis capitata), 38th parallel. Okra may be imported the Queensland fruit fly (Dacus tryoni), into Alaska, Colorado, Connecticut, Bactrocera jarvisi, and B. neohumeralis. Delaware, Hawaii, Idaho, Indiana, (3) Apples and pears from Australia Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Maryland, Massa- that do not originate from an area that chusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mon- is free of fruit flies must be treated for tana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New such pests in accordance with part 305 Jersey, New York, North Dakota, Ohio, of this chapter. If an authorized treat- Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, ment does not exist for a specific fruit South Dakota, Utah, Vermont, Wash- fly, the importation of such apples and ington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyo- pears is prohibited. ming, the District of Columbia, or the U.S. Virgin Islands, or any part of Illi- § 319.56–21 Okra from certain coun- nois, Kentucky, Missouri, or Virginia, tries. north of the 38th parallel, subject to Okra from Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, the requirements of § 319.56–3. Guyana, Mexico, Peru, Suriname, Ven- (d) Importations into areas of California ezuela, and the West Indies may be im- that are not pink bollworm generally in- ported into the United States in ac- fested or suppressive areas. (1) During cordance with this section and all January 1 through March 15, inclusive, other applicable provisions of this sub- okra may be imported into California part. subject to the requirements of § 319.56– (a) Importations into pink bollworm 3. generally infested or suppressive areas in (2) During March 16 through Decem- the United States. Okra may be im- ber 31, inclusive, okra may be imported ported into areas defined in § 301.52–2a into California if it is treated for the as pink bollworm generally infested or pink bollworm in accordance with an suppressive areas, provided the okra is approved treatment listed in part 305 of imported in accordance with the re- this chapter. 362 VerDate Nov<24>2008 14:05 Jan 29, 2010 Jkt 220016 PO 00000 Frm 00372 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\220016.XXX 220016 wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with CFR.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Macadamia Industry in New Zealand
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Pennission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the pennission of the Author. THE MACADAMIA INDUSTRY IN NEW ZEALAND A Thesis for the Degree of Master of Philosophy At Massey University Palmerston North Bernard Coleman Whangarei 2005 ABSTRACT The New Zealand macadamia industry has been characterised by many small plantings, lifestyle blocks up to 1500 trees and two commercial plantations with more than 10000 trees. Completed research programmes have been few, mainly because government funding in horticulture has been channelled to the needs of the major crops such as kiwifruit. Changes in political policy affected funding for minor horticultural crops and spasmodic cuts in finance severely hindered long-term research projects. Because of its small size the macadamia industry had limited funds available from members but some research programmes have been completed including pest control, tree nutrition, basal stain and future research needs. A private consultant, Ian Gordon has carried out variety trials on a local selection. Several selections have been planted in different locations and have proven to be useful in pollination of Beaumont, the main variety planted in New Zealand. Within the limits, set by climatic factors, the suitable growing areas are north of a line from New Plymouth to Gisbome. Both of those areas are marginal for commercial planting but sites on the sheltered north facing positions could grow satisfactory yields. Yields per tree, generally have been below commercial requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Other Pests of Interest
    EU project number 613678 Strategies to develop effective, innovative and practical approaches to protect major European fruit crops from pests and pathogens Work package 1. Pathways of introduction of fruit pests and pathogens Deliverable 1.3. PART 8 - Other interesting findings: -pests listed in one or several of the Alert Lists which are also important for other fruit crops grown in the EU -pests of interest for other crops identified during the study 1 Pests listed in one or several of the Alert Lists which are also important for other fruit crops grown in the EU Information was extracted from the datasheets prepared for the Alert list. Please refer to the datasheets for more information (e.g. on Distribution, full host range, etc). Pest (taxonomic group) Hosts/damage Alert List Aegorhinus superciliosus A. superciliosus is mentioned as the most important pest of Apple (Coleoptera: raspberry and blueberry in the South of Chile. It is also a pest on Vaccinium Curculionidae) currant, hazelnut, fruit crops, berries, gooseberries. Amyelois transitella A. transitella is a serious pest of some nut crops (e.g. almonds, Grapevine (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) pistachios, walnut) Orange- mandarine Archips argyrospilus In the past, heavy damage in the USA and Canada, with serious Apple (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) outbreaks mostly on Rosaceae (especially apple and pear with Orange- 40% fruit losses in some cases) mandarine Argyrotaenia sphaleropa This species also damage Diospyrus kaki and pear in Brazil Grapevine (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) Orange- mandarine Vaccinium Carpophilus davidsoni Polyphagous. Belongs to most serious pests of stone fruit in South Grapevine (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae) Australia (peaches, nectarines and apricots).
    [Show full text]
  • Pest Risk Analysis for Six Moth Species: Lessons for the Biosecurity System on Managing Hitchhiker Organisms
    Pest risk analysis for six moth species: lessons for the biosecurity system on managing hitchhiker organisms Draft approved for release for review February 2008 Pest risk analysis for six moth species: lessons for the biosecurity system on managing hitchhiker organisms MAF Biosecurity New Zealand Wellington New Zealand February 2008 i ii MAF Biosecurity New Zealand Te Manatu Ahuwhenua, Ngaherehere Pastoral House 25 The Terrace P O Box 2526 Wellington New Zealand Telephone: +64 4 894 0100 Facsimile: +64 4 894 0733 Internet: http://www.biosecurity.govt.nz Policy and Risk MAF Biosecurity New Zealand Pest risk analysis for six moth species: lessons for the biosecurity system on managing hitchhiker organisms Date 2008 Draft approved for release for review iii iv Contributors to this Risk Analysis Numerous staff within MAF Biosecurity New Zealand and MAF Quarantine Service contributed invaluable advice, data, ideas and information – many thanks. Both New Zealand and overseas scientists have provided advice and unpublished information from their own research – this support is greatly appreciated. Staff from within the following MAF groups have reviewed all or part of the risk analysis: • Biosecurity Monitoring Group; • Biosecurity Standards Group; • Biosecurity Policy Group; • Response Group; • Surveillance Group; • Incursion and Diagnostic Centres; • MAF Quarantine Service; • Risk Analysis group. The draft risk analysis has also been reviewed by: • John Bain, ENSIS (all chapters); • Melody Keena, Acting Project Leader/Research Entomologist,
    [Show full text]
  • EU Project Number 613678
    EU project number 613678 Strategies to develop effective, innovative and practical approaches to protect major European fruit crops from pests and pathogens Work package 1. Pathways of introduction of fruit pests and pathogens Deliverable 1.3. PART 7 - REPORT on Oranges and Mandarins – Fruit pathway and Alert List Partners involved: EPPO (Grousset F, Petter F, Suffert M) and JKI (Steffen K, Wilstermann A, Schrader G). This document should be cited as ‘Grousset F, Wistermann A, Steffen K, Petter F, Schrader G, Suffert M (2016) DROPSA Deliverable 1.3 Report for Oranges and Mandarins – Fruit pathway and Alert List’. An Excel file containing supporting information is available at https://upload.eppo.int/download/112o3f5b0c014 DROPSA is funded by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration (grant agreement no. 613678). www.dropsaproject.eu [email protected] DROPSA DELIVERABLE REPORT on ORANGES AND MANDARINS – Fruit pathway and Alert List 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Background on oranges and mandarins ..................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Data on production and trade of orange and mandarin fruit ........................................................................ 5 1.3 Characteristics of the pathway ‘orange and mandarin fruit’ .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA § 319.56–21
    Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA § 319.56–21 a declaration certifying that the prod- with this section and all other applica- ucts were grown in a greenhouse in the ble provisions of this subpart. exporting country on Honshu Island or (a) Inspection and treatment for pests of north thereof. the family Tortricidae. An inspector (xiii) Only precleared consignments must take a biometrically designed that have been treated in accordance sample from each lot of apples or pears with part 305 of this chapter are au- that are offered for entry into the thorized. The consignment must be ac- United States. If inspection of the sam- companied by a PPQ Form 203 signed ple discloses that pests of the family by the APHIS inspector on site in the Tortricidae (fruit-leaf roller moths) are exporting country. not present in the lot sampled, the (xiv) Must be accompanied by a fruit may be imported without treat- phytosanitary certificate issued by the ment. If any such pests are found upon national plant protection organization inspection, the lot must be treated of Israel that declares ‘‘These tomatoes with methyl bromide as prescribed in were grown in registered greenhouses part 305 of this chapter. in the Arava Valley of Israel.’’ (b) Treatment of apples and pears from (xv) Must be treated in accordance Australia for fruit flies. (1) Apples from with part 305 of this chapter. Australia (including Tasmania) may be imported without treatment for the (xvi) Must be accompanied by a following fruit flies if they are im- phytosanitary certificate issued by the ported from an area in Australia that national plant protection organization meets the requirements of § 319.56–5 for of the country of origin and with an ad- pest freedom: Mediterranean fruit fly ditional declaration stating that the (Ceratitis capitata), the Queensland fruit fruit is free from Cnephasia jactatana, fly (Bactrocera tryoni), Bactrocera Coscinoptycha improbana, Ctenopseustis aquilonis, and B.
    [Show full text]
  • Pheromone Production, Male Abundance, Body Size, and the Evolution of Elaborate Antennae in Moths Matthew R
    Pheromone production, male abundance, body size, and the evolution of elaborate antennae in moths Matthew R. E. Symonds1,2, Tamara L. Johnson1 & Mark A. Elgar1 1Department of Zoology, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia 2Centre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia. Keywords Abstract Antennal morphology, forewing length, Lepidoptera, phylogenetic generalized least The males of some species of moths possess elaborate feathery antennae. It is widely squares, sex pheromone. assumed that these striking morphological features have evolved through selection for males with greater sensitivity to the female sex pheromone, which is typically Correspondence released in minute quantities. Accordingly, females of species in which males have Matthew R. E. Symonds, School of Life and elaborate (i.e., pectinate, bipectinate, or quadripectinate) antennae should produce Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, 221 the smallest quantities of pheromone. Alternatively, antennal morphology may Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia. Tel: +61 3 9251 7437; Fax: +61 3 be associated with the chemical properties of the pheromone components, with 9251 7626; E-mail: elaborate antennae being associated with pheromones that diffuse more quickly (i.e., [email protected] have lower molecular weights). Finally, antennal morphology may reflect population structure, with low population abundance selecting for higher sensitivity and hence Funded by a Discovery Project grant from the more elaborate antennae. We conducted a phylogenetic comparative analysis to test Australian Research Council (DP0987360). these explanations using pheromone chemical data and trapping data for 152 moth species. Elaborate antennae are associated with larger body size (longer forewing Received: 13 September 2011; Revised: 23 length), which suggests a biological cost that smaller moth species cannot bear.
    [Show full text]
  • Fresh Fruits and Vegetables Manual Some Processes, Equipment, and Materials Described in This Manual May Be Patented
    Fresh Fruits and Vegetables Manual Some processes, equipment, and materials described in this manual may be patented. Inclusion in this manual does not constitute permission for use from the patent owner. The use of any patented invention in the performance of the processes described in this manual is solely the responsibility of the user. APHIS does not indemnify the user against liability for patent infringement and will not be liable to the user or to any third party for patent infringement. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of any individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs). Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communciation of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. When using pesticies, read and follow all label instructions. Second Edition Issued 2012 Contents Fresh Fruits and Vegetables Manual
    [Show full text]
  • Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA § 319.56–21
    Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA § 319.56–21 a declaration certifying that the prod- with this section and all other applica- ucts were grown in a greenhouse in the ble provisions of this subpart. exporting country on Honshu Island or (a) Inspection and treatment for pests of north thereof. the family Tortricidae. An inspector (xiii) Only precleared consignments must take a biometrically designed that have been treated in accordance sample from each lot of apples or pears with part 305 of this chapter are au- that are offered for entry into the thorized. The consignment must be ac- United States. If inspection of the sam- companied by a PPQ Form 203 signed ple discloses that pests of the family by the APHIS inspector on site in the Tortricidae (fruit-leaf roller moths) are exporting country. not present in the lot sampled, the (xiv) Must be accompanied by a fruit may be imported without treat- phytosanitary certificate issued by the ment. If any such pests are found upon national plant protection organization inspection, the lot must be treated of Israel that declares ‘‘These tomatoes with methyl bromide as prescribed in were grown in registered greenhouses part 305 of this chapter. in the Arava Valley of Israel.’’ (b) Treatment of apples and pears from (xv) Must be treated in accordance Australia for fruit flies. (1) Apples from with part 305 of this chapter. Australia (including Tasmania) may be imported without treatment for the (xvi) Must be accompanied by a following fruit flies if they are im- phytosanitary certificate issued by the ported from an area in Australia that national plant protection organization meets the requirements of § 319.56–5 for of the country of origin and with an ad- pest freedom: Mediterranean fruit fly ditional declaration stating that the (Ceratitis capitata), the Queensland fruit fruit is free from Cnephasia jactatana, fly (Bactrocera tryoni), Bactrocera Coscinoptycha improbana, Ctenopseustis aquilonis, and B.
    [Show full text]
  • Exotic Plant and Environment Investigations Report
    Exotic plant and environment investigations report: July to September 2017 Horticultural pests A photo of a suspect exotic fruit-piercing The Ministry for Primary Industries Incursion Investigation team moth found in the Nelson Hospital car and the Plant Health Environment Laboratory (PHEL) teams park in the city of Nelson was submitted investigate and diagnose suspect exotic pests and diseases in the to MPI entomologists. The moth was plant and environment sectors. Investigators and scientists are identified as a female Eudocima materna based in Auckland and Christchurch. These teams provide field (fruit-piercing moth), which is native investigation, diagnostic testing and technical expertise on new to northern Queensland and usually pests and diseases affecting plants and the environment. They also migrates south during late winter. It have surveillance and response functions and carry out research has previously been intercepted in and development to support surveillance and incursion response New Zealand. The larvae of this moth activities. are host-specific and the host plants are not present in New Zealand. The larvae feed on snake vine (Tinospora smilacina) and roundleaf vine (Legnephora moorei) nor any previous borer-related issues. had previously been found in imported (synonyms of Cocculus spp., family Additionally, no recent reports had been American ash flooring timber. In this Menispermaceae). There are no records received from members of the public instance no adult beetles were collected. of any of these names in the Plant who had purchased these boards. This The size of the borer exit holes was Biosecurity Index except on exotic report probably resulted from a single consistent with a Lyctus sp.
    [Show full text]
  • April-May 2016
    NEWSLETTEReco OF THE ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATIONlink ORGANISATIONS OF NEW ZEALAND www.eco.org.nz APRIL-MAY 2016 New Zealand needs to reform fisheries management Research published in mid-May by Auckland, Oxford and Vancouver academics on fisheries catch mis-re- porting is very welcome. This is a welcome, very carefully researched recon- struction of actual catch rather than reported catch. They show over 6 decades, the divergence between what New Zealand reported to the Food and Agricul- ture Organisation, FAO, and the actual catch, is that actual catch is 2.7 times greater than that reported. The research is part of a series of studies by Professor Daniel Pauly and his team at the University of British Columbia’s Fisheries Centre and the global project, The Sea Around Us. The methodology uses a series of source materi- Actual catch was estimated to be 2.7 times the catch report- als. These include the official statistics but those are ed by New Zealand to the FAO. compared with many other sources, and illuminated too by interviews to ground truth official figures, and and weaknesses of their own work, has stood the test to look for explanations of events and discrepencies. of many different fisheries in other parts of the world. This methodology, which is meticulously checked and critiqued by the authors who identify both strengths It is no surprise though, that the industrial scale fish- ing interests, some officials, the Minister and Prime IN THIS ISSUE: NZ needs to reform fisheries management 1 ECO Conference 2016: Climate Incorporated
    [Show full text]
  • A Species List and Bibliography of the Insects Recorded from Norfolk Island
    ISSN 1031-8062 ISBN 0-7313-9500-X A Species List and Bibliography ofthe Insects Recordedfrom Nor:folk Island C.N. Smithers Technical Reports of the Australian Museum Number 13 TECHNICAL REPORTS OF THE AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM Editorial Committee: The Australian Museum's mission is to increase understanding of, and influence public debate on, the Chair: J.M. Leis (VERTEBRATE ZooLOGY) natural environment, human societies and human interaction with the environment. The Museum has V.J. Attenbrow (ANTHROPOLOGY) maintained the highest standards of scholarship in these D.J. Bickel (INVERTEBRATE ZooLOGY) fields for more than 100 years, and is one of Australia's G.D. Edgecombe (PALAEONTOLOGY) foremost publishers of original research in anthropology, geology and zoology. A.E. Greer (VERTEBRATE ZooLOGY) The Records of the Australian Museum (ISSN 0067- F.L. Sutherland (GEOLOGY) 1975) publishes the results of research that has utilised G.D.F. Wilson (INVERTEBRATE ZooLOGY) Australian Museum collections and studies that relate in other ways to the Museum's mission. There is an emphasis on research in the Australasian, southwest Pacific or Indian Editor: S.F. McEvey Ocean regions. The Records is released as three issues of [email protected] one volume annually, volume 50 is published this year. Monographs are published about once a year as Records Director: D.J.G. Griffin of the Australian Museum, Supplements. Supplement 24 (ISBN 0-7313-8807-0) was published in June 1998. Catalogues, lists and databases have, since 1988, been published as numbered Technical Reports ofthe Australian Museum (ISSN 1031-8062). Technical Report number 13 was published in 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This PDF File
    V PROCEEDINGS OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY OF NSW O PROCEEDINGS L . 1 VOLUME 140 4 of the 0 D E C CCEDER A E E S M LINNEAN O THE F O R B LINNEAN N G T E E E T SOCIETY S R N I OF NEW SOUTH WALES 2 M V 0 D I 1 SOCIETY C X C C L X 8 of NEW SOUTH WALES P R CONTENTS O VOLUME 140 C Volume 140 E E Papers published in 2018, compiled 31 December 2018 D I Published at http://escholarship.library.usyd.edu.au/journals/index.php/LIN N G (date individual papers were published online at eScholarship) S O F 1-6 Notes on the mammals collected on the Chevert expedition, to New Guinea, in 1875. T H G. R. Fulton. E Published 10 January 2018. L I 7-243 Norfolk Island quarantine survey 2012-2014 – a comprehensive assessment of an isolated subtropical island. N N E G.V.Maynard, B.J.Lepschi and S.F.Malfroy. A Published 10 March 2018. N S 245-251 Archiving the scientific legacy of Dr. Alec Costin. O C G. T. Wright, K. L. McDougall and G. J. McCarthy. I E Published 6 August 2018. T 253-264 Karst values of Kosciuszko National Park, a review of values and of recent research. Y O A. Spate and A. Baker. F N Published 25 August 2018. S . 265-294 Conodonts, corals and stromatoporoids from Late Ordovician and Latest Silurian allochthonous limestones in the W Cuga Burga Volcanics of central western New South Wales.
    [Show full text]