DOCSLIB.ORG

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA § 319.56–13

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA § 319.56–13 Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA § 319.56–13 (3) For propagation. Acorns and chest- cordance with § 319.56–3. Such fruits and nuts from any country may be im- vegetables must be held in accordance ported for propagation only in accord- with the requirements for importing ance with the applicable requirements frozen fruits and vegetables in part 305 in §§ 319.37 through 319.37–14 of this of this chapter.. part. (c) Macadamia nuts. Macadamia nuts [72 FR 39501, July 18, 2007, as amended at 75 in the husk or shell are prohibited im- FR 4252, Jan. 26, 2010] portation into the United States unless the macadamia nuts were produced in, § 319.56–13 Fruits and vegetables al- and imported from, St. Eustatius. lowed importation subject to speci- fied conditions. [72 FR 39501, July 18, 2007, as amended at 75 FR 4252, Jan. 26, 2010] (a) The following fruits and vegeta- bles may be imported in accordance § 319.56–12 Importation of frozen fruits with § 319.56–3 and any additional re- and vegetables. quirements specified in paragraph (b) Frozen fruits and vegetables may be of this section. imported into the United States in ac- Country/locality of Additional origin Common name Botanical name Plant part(s) requirements Algeria .................... Pineapple .............. Ananas comosus .................................. Fruit ....................... (b)(2)(vi). Angola .................... Pineapple .............. Ananas comosus .................................. Fruit ....................... (b)(2)(vi). Antigua and Bar- Pineapple .............. Ananas comosus .................................. Fruit ....................... (b)(2)(vi). buda. Argentina ................ Pineapple .............. Ananas comosus .................................. Fruit ....................... (b)(2)(vi). Australia (Tasmania Pineapple .............. Ananas comosus .................................. Fruit ....................... (b)(2)(vi). only). Austria .................... Asparagus, white ... Asparagus officinalis ............................. Shoot ..................... (b)(4)(iii). Bahamas ................ Pineapple .............. Ananas comosus .................................. Fruit ....................... (b)(2)(vi). Barbados ................ Pineapple .............. Ananas comosus .................................. Fruit ....................... (b)(2)(vi). Belgium ................... Apricot ................... Prunus armeniaca ................................. Fruit ....................... (b)(5)(xi). Fig ......................... Ficus carica ........................................... Fruit ....................... (b)(5)(xi). Nectarine ............... Prunus persica var. nucipersica ........... Fruit ....................... (b)(5)(xi). Peach .................... Prunus persica ...................................... Fruit ....................... (b)(5)(xi). Plum ...................... Prunus domestica ................................. Fruit ....................... (b)(5)(xi). Belize ...................... Papaya .................. Carica papaya ....................................... Fruit ....................... (b)(1)(i), (b)(2)(iii). Pineapple .............. Ananas comosus .................................. Fruit ....................... (b)(2)(vi). Rambutan .............. Nephelium lappaceum .......................... Fruit ....................... (b)(2)(i), (b)(5)(ii). Benin ...................... Pineapple .............. Ananas comosus .................................. Fruit ....................... (b)(2)(vi). Bolivia ..................... Pineapple .............. Ananas comosus .................................. Fruit ....................... (b)(2)(vi). Brazil ....................... Cantaloupe ............ Cucumis melo var. cantaloupensis ....... Fruit ....................... (b)(1)(v), (b)(3). Cassava ................ Manihot esculenta ................................. Fruit ....................... (b)(2)(vii). Honeydew melon .. Cucumis melo ....................................... Fruit ....................... (b)(1)(v), (b)(3). Pineapple .............. Ananas comosus .................................. Fruit ....................... (b)(2)(vi). Watermelon ........... Citrullus lanatus var. lanatus ................ Fruit ....................... (b)(1)(v), (b)(3). Burkina Faso .......... Pineapple .............. Ananas comosus .................................. Fruit ....................... (b)(2)(vi). Cameroon ............... Pineapple .............. Ananas comosus .................................. Fruit ....................... (b)(2)(vi). Cayman Islands ...... Pineapple .............. Ananas comosus .................................. Fruit ....................... (b)(2)(vi). Chile ....................... African horned cu- Cucumis metuliferus ............................. Fruit ....................... (b)(2)(i). cumber. Pineapple .............. Ananas comosus .................................. Fruit ....................... (b)(2)(vi). China ...................... Litchi ...................... Litchi chinensis ...................................... Fruit ....................... (b)(2)(v). Columbia ................ Pineapple .............. Ananas comosus .................................. Fruit ....................... (b)(2)(vi). Yellow pitaya ......... Selinicereus megalanthus ..................... Fruit ....................... (b)(5)(xiii). Congo, Democratic Pineapple .............. Ananas comosus .................................. Fruit ....................... (b)(2)(vi). Republic of. Cook Islands ........... Ginger .................... Zingiber officinalis ................................. Root ....................... (b)(2)(ii). Banana .................. Musa spp. ............................................. Fruit ....................... (b)(4)(i). Pineapple .............. Ananas comosus .................................. Fruit ....................... (b)(2)(vi), (b)(5)(vi). Costa Rica .............. Cucurbit ................. Cucurbitaceae ....................................... Fruit ....................... (b)(2)(iii), (b)(3). Pineapple .............. Ananas comosus .................................. Fruit ....................... (b)(2)(vi). Rambutan .............. Nephelium lappaceum .......................... Fruit ....................... (b)(2)(i), (b)(5)(ii). Cote d’Ivoire ........... Pineapple .............. Ananas comosus .................................. Fruit ....................... (b)(2)(vi). Dominica ................. Papaya .................. Carica papaya ....................................... Fruit ....................... (b)(2)(vi). Pineapple .............. Ananas comosus .................................. Fruit ....................... (b)(2)(vi). Dominican Republic Cucurbit ................. Cucurbitaceae ....................................... Fruit ....................... (b)(2)(iii), (b)(3). Papaya .................. Carica papaya ....................................... Fruit ....................... (b)(2)(iii), (b)(2)(vi). Pineapple .............. Ananas comosus .................................. Fruit ....................... (b)(2)(iii), (b)(2)(vi). Ecuador .................. Pineapple .............. Ananas comosus .................................. Fruit ....................... (b)(2)(iii), (b)(2)(vi). 307 VerDate Mar<15>2010 11:29 Feb 10, 2012 Jkt 226016 PO 00000 Frm 00317 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\226016.XXX 226016 emcdonald on DSK29S0YB1PROD with CFR § 319.56–13 7 CFR Ch. III (1–1–12 Edition) Country/locality of Additional origin Common name Botanical name Plant part(s) requirements Egypt ...................... Pineapple .............. Ananas comosus .................................. Fruit ....................... (b)(2)(vi). El Salvador ............. Fennel ................... Foeniculum vulgare ............................... Leaf and stem ....... (b)(2)(i). German chamomile Matricaria recutita and Matricaria Flower and leaf ..... (b)(2)(i). chamomilla. Oregano or sweet Origanum spp. ...................................... Leaf and stem ....... (b)(2)(i). marjoram. Parsley .................. Petroselinum crispum ........................... Leaf and stem ....... (b)(2)(i). Pineapple .............. Ananas comosus .................................. Fruit ....................... (b)(2)(vi). Rambutan .............. Nephelium lappaceum .......................... Fruit ....................... (b)(2)(i), (b)(5)(ii). Rosemary .............. Rosmarinus officinalis ........................... Leaf and stem ....... (b)(2)(i). Waterlily or lotus ... Nelumbo nucifera .................................. Roots without soil .. (b)(2)(i). Yam-bean or Pachyrhizus spp. ................................... Roots without soil .. (b)(2)(i). jicama. Fiji ........................... Pineapple .............. Ananas comosus .................................. Fruit ....................... (b)(2)(vi), (b)(5)(vi). France .................... Bean ...................... Glycine max (Soybean); Phaseolus Fruit ....................... (b)(5)(x). coccineus, (Scarlet or french runner bean); Phaseolus lunatus (lima bean); Phaseolus vulgaris (green bean, kidney bean, navy bean, pinto bean, red bean, string bean, white bean); Vicia faba (faba bean, broadbean, haba, habichuela, horsebean, silkworm bean, windsor bean; Vigna radiata (mung bean); Vigna unguiculata (includes: ssp. cylindrica, ssp. dekintiana, ssp. sesquipedalis (yard-long bean, as- paragus bean, long bean), ssp. unguiculata (southern pea, black- eyed bean, black-eyed
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (Aegle Marmelos Correa.) Fruit
    Advances in Plants & Agriculture Research Research Article Open Access Physico-chemical changes and pest incidence associated with development of bael (Aegle marmelos Correa.) fruit Abstract Volume 7 Issue 6 - 2017 This study investigated the nutritional changes and the effects of pests on the quality BR Jana, Md Idris, Madhumita Singh and development of Bael (Aegle marmelos Correa.) fruit. It has been found in the ICAR-RCER, Research Centre, Makhana, Darbhanga Bihar, India present study that there was a numbers of biochemical changes occurred during fruit development. Even, pest incidence in tender fruits on external surface and Correspondence: Bakul Ranjan Jana, Scientist and research their subsequent infestation are also noted which resulted in economic loss in crop fellow of bael project, ICAR-RCER, Research Center Ranchi, production system. The objectives of this study were to quantify different nutraceuticals Jharkhand-834010, India, Email [email protected] compound, their origin and pest incidence in hard fruits like bael. Results revealed that fruit weight, fruit volume, fruit length and fruit diameter, seed weight and rind weight Received: July 24, 2017 | Published: November 10, 2017 gradually increased from fruit set to maturity. Total soluble solid content (26.00B) and total sugars (14.07%) were maximum at maturity. Carbohydrates and carotene contents gradually increased up to November. Due to development in mucilage (carotene dilution) and other soluble solids, carbohydrates slightly decreased in November after that it was gradually increased at harvest time. These nutraceuticals reflected double sigmoid growth curve in bael. There was no carotene development in first two months of fruit growth and it’s development follows the trend as that of carbohydrates.
    [Show full text]
  • The Isolation and Genetic Characterisation of a Novel Alphabaculovirus for the Microbial Control of Cryptophlebia Peltastica and Closely Related Tortricid Pests
    RHODES UNIVERSITY Where leaders learn The isolation and genetic characterisation of a novel alphabaculovirus for the microbial control of Cryptophlebia peltastica and closely related tortricid pests Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY At RHODES UNIVERSITY By TAMRYN MARSBERG December 2016 ABSTRACT Cryptophlebia peltastica (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) is an economically damaging pest of litchis and macadamias in South Africa. Cryptophlebia peltastica causes both pre- and post-harvest damage to litchis, reducing overall yields and thus classifying the pest as a phytosanitary risk. Various control methods have been implemented against C. peltastica in an integrated pest management programme. These control methods include chemical control, cultural control and biological control. However, these methods have not yet provided satisfactory control as of yet. As a result, an alternative control option needs to be identified and implemented into the IPM programme. An alternative method of control that has proved successful in other agricultural sectors and not yet implemented in the control of C. peltastica is that of microbial control, specifically the use of baculovirus biopesticides. This study aimed to isolate and characterise a novel baculovirus from a laboratory culture of C. peltastica that could be used as a commercially available baculovirus biopesticide. In order to isolate a baculovirus a laboratory culture of C. peltastica was successfully established at Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa. This is the first time a laboratory culture of C. peltastica has been established. This allowed for various biological aspects of the pest to be determined, which included: length of the life cycle, fecundity and time to oviposition, egg and larval development and percentage hatch.
    [Show full text]
  • The Macadamia Industry in New Zealand
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Pennission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the pennission of the Author. THE MACADAMIA INDUSTRY IN NEW ZEALAND A Thesis for the Degree of Master of Philosophy At Massey University Palmerston North Bernard Coleman Whangarei 2005 ABSTRACT The New Zealand macadamia industry has been characterised by many small plantings, lifestyle blocks up to 1500 trees and two commercial plantations with more than 10000 trees. Completed research programmes have been few, mainly because government funding in horticulture has been channelled to the needs of the major crops such as kiwifruit. Changes in political policy affected funding for minor horticultural crops and spasmodic cuts in finance severely hindered long-term research projects. Because of its small size the macadamia industry had limited funds available from members but some research programmes have been completed including pest control, tree nutrition, basal stain and future research needs. A private consultant, Ian Gordon has carried out variety trials on a local selection. Several selections have been planted in different locations and have proven to be useful in pollination of Beaumont, the main variety planted in New Zealand. Within the limits, set by climatic factors, the suitable growing areas are north of a line from New Plymouth to Gisbome. Both of those areas are marginal for commercial planting but sites on the sheltered north facing positions could grow satisfactory yields. Yields per tree, generally have been below commercial requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Other Pests of Interest
    EU project number 613678 Strategies to develop effective, innovative and practical approaches to protect major European fruit crops from pests and pathogens Work package 1. Pathways of introduction of fruit pests and pathogens Deliverable 1.3. PART 8 - Other interesting findings: -pests listed in one or several of the Alert Lists which are also important for other fruit crops grown in the EU -pests of interest for other crops identified during the study 1 Pests listed in one or several of the Alert Lists which are also important for other fruit crops grown in the EU Information was extracted from the datasheets prepared for the Alert list. Please refer to the datasheets for more information (e.g. on Distribution, full host range, etc). Pest (taxonomic group) Hosts/damage Alert List Aegorhinus superciliosus A. superciliosus is mentioned as the most important pest of Apple (Coleoptera: raspberry and blueberry in the South of Chile. It is also a pest on Vaccinium Curculionidae) currant, hazelnut, fruit crops, berries, gooseberries. Amyelois transitella A. transitella is a serious pest of some nut crops (e.g. almonds, Grapevine (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) pistachios, walnut) Orange- mandarine Archips argyrospilus In the past, heavy damage in the USA and Canada, with serious Apple (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) outbreaks mostly on Rosaceae (especially apple and pear with Orange- 40% fruit losses in some cases) mandarine Argyrotaenia sphaleropa This species also damage Diospyrus kaki and pear in Brazil Grapevine (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) Orange- mandarine Vaccinium Carpophilus davidsoni Polyphagous. Belongs to most serious pests of stone fruit in South Grapevine (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae) Australia (peaches, nectarines and apricots).
    [Show full text]
  • Thaumatotibia Leucotreta (Meyrick)
    Keys About Fact Sheets Glossary Larval Morphology References << Previous fact sheet Next fact sheet >> TORTRICIDAE - Thaumatotibia leucotreta (Meyrick) Taxonomy Click here to download this Fact Sheet as a printable PDF Tortricoidea: Tortricidae: Olethreutinae: Grapholitini: Thaumatotibia leucotreta (Meyrick) Common names: false codling moth Synonyms: Thaumatotibia roerigii The false codling moth is incorrectly referred to as Cryptophlebia leucotreta in many publications (Brown 2006). Fig. 1: Late instar, lateral view Larval diagnosis (Summary) L pinaculum on T1 enlarged and extending beneath and beyond (posterad of) the spiracle Anal comb present with 2-10 teeth D1 and SD1 on the same pinaculum on A9 Fig. 2: Early instar, lateral view Spiracle on A8 displaced posterad of SD pinaculum Crochets unevenly triordinal, 36-42 L group on A9 usually trisetose (all setae usually on same pinaulum) Host/origin information Nearly half of all T. leucotreta interceptions come from South Africa on Citrus. This species is also one of the most commonly intercepted tortricids on pepper (Capsicum annuum) and eggplant (Solanum melongena). Other common origin/host combinations are listed below: Fig. 3: L group on T1 Fig. 4: Anal comb Origin Host(s) [Africa] Capsicum annuum, Solanum melongena, Citrus Cape Verde Ziziphus Ghana Capsicum Nigeria Capsicum South Africa Citrus Recorded distribution Fig. 5: A9, anal shield Fig. 6: A8 spiracle Thaumatotibia leucotreta is widely distributed across Africa and has been reported from approximately 40 countries on the African continent. It is occasionally reported from Europe and is considered locally present in Israel (EPPO 2013). Identifcation authority (Summary) Positive identifications of T. leucotreta should be restricted to larvae intercepted from Africa (or Europe, and especially the Netherlands, if transshipment is suspected) with the L pinaculum on T1 enlarged and extending beneath and beyond (posterad of) the spiracle and an anal comb present.
    [Show full text]
  • Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring Within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘I: Synthesis Report
    Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘i: Synthesis Report Prepared by Francis G. Howarth, David J. Preston, and Richard Pyle Honolulu, Hawaii January 2012 Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘i: Synthesis Report Francis G. Howarth, David J. Preston, and Richard Pyle Hawaii Biological Survey Bishop Museum Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817 USA Prepared for EKNA Services Inc. 615 Pi‘ikoi Street, Suite 300 Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96814 and State of Hawaii, Department of Transportation, Airports Division Bishop Museum Technical Report 58 Honolulu, Hawaii January 2012 Bishop Museum Press 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, Hawai‘i Copyright 2012 Bishop Museum All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America ISSN 1085-455X Contribution No. 2012 001 to the Hawaii Biological Survey COVER Adult male Hawaiian long-horned wood-borer, Plagithmysus kahului, on its host plant Chenopodium oahuense. This species is endemic to lowland Maui and was discovered during the arthropod surveys. Photograph by Forest and Kim Starr, Makawao, Maui. Used with permission. Hawaii Biological Report on Monitoring Arthropods within Kahului Airport Environs, Synthesis TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents …………….......................................................……………...........……………..…..….i. Executive Summary …….....................................................…………………...........……………..…..….1 Introduction ..................................................................………………………...........……………..…..….4
    [Show full text]
  • Pest Risk Analysis for Six Moth Species: Lessons for the Biosecurity System on Managing Hitchhiker Organisms
    Pest risk analysis for six moth species: lessons for the biosecurity system on managing hitchhiker organisms Draft approved for release for review February 2008 Pest risk analysis for six moth species: lessons for the biosecurity system on managing hitchhiker organisms MAF Biosecurity New Zealand Wellington New Zealand February 2008 i ii MAF Biosecurity New Zealand Te Manatu Ahuwhenua, Ngaherehere Pastoral House 25 The Terrace P O Box 2526 Wellington New Zealand Telephone: +64 4 894 0100 Facsimile: +64 4 894 0733 Internet: http://www.biosecurity.govt.nz Policy and Risk MAF Biosecurity New Zealand Pest risk analysis for six moth species: lessons for the biosecurity system on managing hitchhiker organisms Date 2008 Draft approved for release for review iii iv Contributors to this Risk Analysis Numerous staff within MAF Biosecurity New Zealand and MAF Quarantine Service contributed invaluable advice, data, ideas and information – many thanks. Both New Zealand and overseas scientists have provided advice and unpublished information from their own research – this support is greatly appreciated. Staff from within the following MAF groups have reviewed all or part of the risk analysis: • Biosecurity Monitoring Group; • Biosecurity Standards Group; • Biosecurity Policy Group; • Response Group; • Surveillance Group; • Incursion and Diagnostic Centres; • MAF Quarantine Service; • Risk Analysis group. The draft risk analysis has also been reviewed by: • John Bain, ENSIS (all chapters); • Melody Keena, Acting Project Leader/Research Entomologist,
    [Show full text]
  • USDA's Operational Experience in the Growing Use of Irradiation As A
    USDA’s Operational Experience in the Growing Use of Irradiation as a Plant Quarantine Treatment AlanAlan GreenGreen Executive Director USDA, APHIS, PPQ Riverdale, MD, USA IrradiationIrradiation asas aa CommodityCommodity TreatmentTreatment Background: • Over 60 countries using food irradiation • Hawaii irradiating fruit and vegetables since 1995 • Increased interest to find Methyl Bromide alternative IrradiationIrradiation asas aa CommodityCommodity TreatmentTreatment International Standard : Endorsed by International Standards: – International Plant Protection Convention (ISPM 18) USDA Regulations : October 23, 2002: Overall requirements for irradiation as a quarantine treatment (Closely followed ISPM 18) January 27, 2006: Establishes generic doses for insects and specifically for fruit flies ObjectiveObjective ofof IrradiationIrradiation • Prevent establishment of pests Mortality is NOT necessary Preventing reproduction or completion of life cycle IS necessary USDA Rule and ISPM 18 Require: • Establish dose to neutralize pest • Ensure minimum dose is delivered • Establish safeguards to identify treated product and prevent infestation Why Irradiation was different Manages a very wide range of pests Objective of treatment is not death of pest Concerns about consumer acceptance ApprovedApproved dosesdoses -- ApprovedApproved forfor pestpest speciesspecies Pest _ Common name Dose ( Gy ) Bactrocera dorsalis Oriental FF 250 Ceratitis capitata Mediterranean FF 225 B. cucurbitae Melon fly 210 Anastrepha fraterculus South American FF
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Cryptophlebia Walsingham, 1900 (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae) from Korea
    Anim. Syst. Evol. Divers. Vol. 32, No. 4: 293-296, October 2016 https://doi.org/10.5635/ASED.2016.32.4.030 Review article Review of Cryptophlebia Walsingham, 1900 (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae) from Korea Jae-Cheon Sohn1, Sung-Soo Kim2, Soowon Cho3,* 1Institute of Littoral Environment, Mokpo National University, Muan 58554, Korea 2Research Institute for East Asian Environment and Biology, Yongin 16894, Korea 3Department of Plant Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea ABSTRACT Two species of Cryptophlebia: C. nota Kawabe and C. ombrodelta (Lower), are reported from Korea for the first time. This is in fact the first record of Cryptophlebia from Korea, as the previous Korean records of the genus were based on one species, Cryptophlebia hematoma Diakonoff, currently assigned to Thaumatotibia Zacher. Photos of the superficial and genital features are provided for the two Korean species of Cryptophlebia and their distribution and host plants are summarized. Cryptophlebia ombrodelta is recognized as an adventive species in Korea and a potential pest on leguminoseous crops. Keywords: Cryptophlebia, Korea, new records, taxonomy, Tortricidae INTRODUCTION This species was later combined to Thaumatotibia (Komai, 1999). Therefore, the present study is in fact the first record Cryptophlebia Walsingham comprises about 53 species pre- of Cryptophlebia from Korea. We report two species of dominantly distributing in the Indo-Pacific Region (Komai, Cryptophlebia new to Korea. All the specimens examined 2013). Obraztsov (1958) proposed that Cryptophlebia be- for this study are deposited at the Department of Plant Med- longs to olethreutine tribe, Grapholitini. Differing from this, icine, Chungbuk National University (CBNU); the National Common (1990) mentioned its relatedness with Microcors- Institute of Biological Resource, Incheon (NIBR); and the ini or Olethreutini, while Horak and Brown (1991) assigned second author’s private collection (KSS).
    [Show full text]
  • EU Project Number 613678
    EU project number 613678 Strategies to develop effective, innovative and practical approaches to protect major European fruit crops from pests and pathogens Work package 1. Pathways of introduction of fruit pests and pathogens Deliverable 1.3. PART 7 - REPORT on Oranges and Mandarins – Fruit pathway and Alert List Partners involved: EPPO (Grousset F, Petter F, Suffert M) and JKI (Steffen K, Wilstermann A, Schrader G). This document should be cited as ‘Grousset F, Wistermann A, Steffen K, Petter F, Schrader G, Suffert M (2016) DROPSA Deliverable 1.3 Report for Oranges and Mandarins – Fruit pathway and Alert List’. An Excel file containing supporting information is available at https://upload.eppo.int/download/112o3f5b0c014 DROPSA is funded by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration (grant agreement no. 613678). www.dropsaproject.eu [email protected] DROPSA DELIVERABLE REPORT on ORANGES AND MANDARINS – Fruit pathway and Alert List 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Background on oranges and mandarins ..................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Data on production and trade of orange and mandarin fruit ........................................................................ 5 1.3 Characteristics of the pathway ‘orange and mandarin fruit’ .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hot Water Immersion to Ensure Quarantine Security for Cryptophlebia Spp
    Exhibit 4b, #33 STORED-PRODUCT AND QUARANTINE ENTOMOLOGY Hot Water Immersion to Ensure Quarantine Security for Cryptophlebia spp. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in Lychee and Longan Exported from Hawaii PETER A. FOLLETT AND SUZANNE S. SANXTER U.S. PaciÞc Basin Agricultural Research Center, USDAÐARS, P.O. Box 4459, Hilo, HI 96720 J. Econ. Entomol. 94(5): 1292Ð1295 (2001) ABSTRACT We determined whether immersion in 49ЊC water for 20 min, a quarantine treatment developed for disinfestation of fruit ßies in lychee, Litchi chinensis Sonn., and longan, Dimocarpus longan (Lourd.) Steud., exported from Hawaii, would also disinfest fruit of two species of Crypto- phlebia. The pattern of tolerance to heat in Cryptophlebia illepida (Butler) was generally eggs Ͻ neonates Ͻ early instars ϭ lateinstars Ͻ pupae. No C. illepida survived immersion for 16 or 20 min. Late fourth and Þfth instars were determined to be the most tolerant stage that occurs in harvested fruit. Lateinstars of Cryptophlebia ombrodelta (Lower) were more tolerant of hot-water immersion than thoseof C. illepida, but no C. ombrodelta late instars survived immersion for 16 or 20 min. The hot water immersion quarantine treatment for fruit ßies should effectively disinfest lychees and longans of any Cryptophlebia. KEY WORDS Cryptophlebia, quarantine pest, heat treatment, disinfestations HOT WATER IMMERSION at 49ЊC for 20 min is approved by four varieties of longan harvested from orchards in the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal Plant Hawaii over a two-year period, Cryptophlebia infes- Health Inspection Service, as a quarantine treatment tation rates were 1.5 and 0.14%, respectively (G. T. for HawaiiÕs tephritid fruit ßy pests attacking lychee, McQuate, USDA, Hilo, HI, personal communication).
    [Show full text]
  • List of Intercepted Plant Pests
    tvrf- APHIS 82-6 February 1980 "TJ 5Pi^^^ LIST OF INTERCEPTED PLANT PESTS (Pests Recorded from October 1, 1977 Through September 30, 1978) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE APHIS 82-6 February 1980 LIST OF INTERCEPTED PLANT PESTS (Pests Recorded from October 1, 1977 Through September 30, 1978) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Contents Page Introduct ion T]l Changes in nomenclature IV V Correction ; Summary of number of interceptions listed 1 Tabulation of insects ^ Hosts and insects ^U Insects intercepted with hosts unknown I'O Countries of origin and insects 116 Tabulation of mites 140 Hosts and mites 141 Mites intercepted with hosts unknown 142 Countries of origin and mites 143 Tabulation of mollusks 144 Hosts and mollusks 1 50 Mollusks intercepted with hosts unknown 152 Countries of origin and mollusks 153 Tabulation of diseases 155 Hosts and diseases 166 Diseases intercepted with hosts unknown 170 Countries of origin and diseases 171 Tabulation of nematodes 174 Hosts and nematodes • 176 Nematodes intercepted with hosts unknown 1 77 Countries of origin and nematodes 1 78 Plant Protection and Quarantine Programs Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Building Hyattsville, Maryland 20782 n List of Intercepted Plant Pests, 1978 Plant Importation and Technical Support Staff Technical Information Unit INTRODUCTION This, the 61st annual report of pests and pathogens found in agricultural quarantine inspections. Is the 6th such publication to be assembled and printed from computerized interception records. It summarizes records of significant living plant pests and pathogens found in, on, or with plants, plant products, carriers and container vans, imported or entering into the continental United States and Hawaii or the offshore possessions, or moving between these areas.
    [Show full text]