Exotic Plant and Environment Investigations Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Macadamia Industry in New Zealand
Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Pennission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the pennission of the Author. THE MACADAMIA INDUSTRY IN NEW ZEALAND A Thesis for the Degree of Master of Philosophy At Massey University Palmerston North Bernard Coleman Whangarei 2005 ABSTRACT The New Zealand macadamia industry has been characterised by many small plantings, lifestyle blocks up to 1500 trees and two commercial plantations with more than 10000 trees. Completed research programmes have been few, mainly because government funding in horticulture has been channelled to the needs of the major crops such as kiwifruit. Changes in political policy affected funding for minor horticultural crops and spasmodic cuts in finance severely hindered long-term research projects. Because of its small size the macadamia industry had limited funds available from members but some research programmes have been completed including pest control, tree nutrition, basal stain and future research needs. A private consultant, Ian Gordon has carried out variety trials on a local selection. Several selections have been planted in different locations and have proven to be useful in pollination of Beaumont, the main variety planted in New Zealand. Within the limits, set by climatic factors, the suitable growing areas are north of a line from New Plymouth to Gisbome. Both of those areas are marginal for commercial planting but sites on the sheltered north facing positions could grow satisfactory yields. Yields per tree, generally have been below commercial requirements. -
List of Other Pests of Interest
EU project number 613678 Strategies to develop effective, innovative and practical approaches to protect major European fruit crops from pests and pathogens Work package 1. Pathways of introduction of fruit pests and pathogens Deliverable 1.3. PART 8 - Other interesting findings: -pests listed in one or several of the Alert Lists which are also important for other fruit crops grown in the EU -pests of interest for other crops identified during the study 1 Pests listed in one or several of the Alert Lists which are also important for other fruit crops grown in the EU Information was extracted from the datasheets prepared for the Alert list. Please refer to the datasheets for more information (e.g. on Distribution, full host range, etc). Pest (taxonomic group) Hosts/damage Alert List Aegorhinus superciliosus A. superciliosus is mentioned as the most important pest of Apple (Coleoptera: raspberry and blueberry in the South of Chile. It is also a pest on Vaccinium Curculionidae) currant, hazelnut, fruit crops, berries, gooseberries. Amyelois transitella A. transitella is a serious pest of some nut crops (e.g. almonds, Grapevine (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) pistachios, walnut) Orange- mandarine Archips argyrospilus In the past, heavy damage in the USA and Canada, with serious Apple (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) outbreaks mostly on Rosaceae (especially apple and pear with Orange- 40% fruit losses in some cases) mandarine Argyrotaenia sphaleropa This species also damage Diospyrus kaki and pear in Brazil Grapevine (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) Orange- mandarine Vaccinium Carpophilus davidsoni Polyphagous. Belongs to most serious pests of stone fruit in South Grapevine (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae) Australia (peaches, nectarines and apricots). -
Pest Risk Analysis for Six Moth Species: Lessons for the Biosecurity System on Managing Hitchhiker Organisms
Pest risk analysis for six moth species: lessons for the biosecurity system on managing hitchhiker organisms Draft approved for release for review February 2008 Pest risk analysis for six moth species: lessons for the biosecurity system on managing hitchhiker organisms MAF Biosecurity New Zealand Wellington New Zealand February 2008 i ii MAF Biosecurity New Zealand Te Manatu Ahuwhenua, Ngaherehere Pastoral House 25 The Terrace P O Box 2526 Wellington New Zealand Telephone: +64 4 894 0100 Facsimile: +64 4 894 0733 Internet: http://www.biosecurity.govt.nz Policy and Risk MAF Biosecurity New Zealand Pest risk analysis for six moth species: lessons for the biosecurity system on managing hitchhiker organisms Date 2008 Draft approved for release for review iii iv Contributors to this Risk Analysis Numerous staff within MAF Biosecurity New Zealand and MAF Quarantine Service contributed invaluable advice, data, ideas and information – many thanks. Both New Zealand and overseas scientists have provided advice and unpublished information from their own research – this support is greatly appreciated. Staff from within the following MAF groups have reviewed all or part of the risk analysis: • Biosecurity Monitoring Group; • Biosecurity Standards Group; • Biosecurity Policy Group; • Response Group; • Surveillance Group; • Incursion and Diagnostic Centres; • MAF Quarantine Service; • Risk Analysis group. The draft risk analysis has also been reviewed by: • John Bain, ENSIS (all chapters); • Melody Keena, Acting Project Leader/Research Entomologist, -
View Full Text
SurveillanceMINISTRY FOR PRIMARY INDUSTRIES REPORTING ON NEW ZEALAND’S BIOSECURITY HEALTH STATUS VOLUME 44, NO 4, DECEMBER 2017 INSIDE: Quarterly report of investigations of suspected exotic diseases PlantsINSIDE: and environment investigation report Quarterly report of investigations of suspected exotic marine and freshwater pestsReports and from diseases Ministry for Primary Industries Introducing the MPI Readiness and Response Services Directorate Quarterly reports: July to September 2017 Ants: old foes and new threats to New Zealand Surveillance ISSN 1176-5305 Surveillance is published on behalf of the Director Diagnostics & Surveillance Services Contents (Veronica Herrera). The articles in this quarterly report do not necessarily reflect government policy. Editorial Editor: Michael Bradstock Aquatic biosecurity: pathways to protection 3 Technical Editors: Jonathan Watts, Lora Peacock ANIMALS Correspondence and requests to receive Reports from Ministry for Primary Industries Surveillance should be addressed to: Introducing the MPI Readiness and Response Services Directorate 4 Editor Korea-New Zealand 2nd Animal Health and Epidemiology Workshop, Surveillance Ministry for Primary Industries 13−15 September 2017 6 PO Box 2526 Wellington, New Zealand Quarterly reports: July to September 2017 email: [email protected] Quarterly review of diagnostic cases 8 Quarterly report of investigations of suspected exotic diseases 19 Reproduction: Articles in Surveillance may be reproduced (except for commercial use or on advertising or promotional material), provided proper acknowledgement is made to the author MARINE AND FRESHWATER and Surveillance as source. Reports from Ministry for Primary Industries Publication: Surveillance is published quarterly Emerging risks in the aquatic space 21 in March, June, September and December. Distribution via email is free of charge for Quarterly reports: July to September 2017 subscribers in New Zealand and overseas. -
Technical Annual Report 2002/03
Northern Territory Department of Business, Industry and Resource Development Primary Industry Group Technical Annual Report 2002-03 Northern Territory Department of Business, Industry and Resource Development Primary Industry Group Berrimah Farm Makagon Road Berrimah NT 0828 GPO Box 3000 Darwin NT 0801 www.dbird.nt.gov.au [email protected] Tel: +61 8 8999 2313 Fax: +61 8 8999 2307 Technical Bulletin No. 313 Price: $11.00 ISSN: 0158-2763 DISCLAIMER While all care has been taken to ensure that information contained in this Technical Bulletin is true and correct at the time of publication, changes in circumstances after the time of publication may impact on the accuracy of its information. The Northern Territory of Australia gives no warranty or assurance, and makes no representation as to the accuracy of any information or advice contained in this Technical Bulletin, or that it is suitable for your intended use. You should not rely upon information in this publication for the purpose of making any serious, business or investment decisions without obtaining independent and/or professional advice in relation to your particular situation. The Northern Territory of Australia disclaims any liability or responsibility or duty of care towards any person for loss or damage caused by any use of or reliance on the information contained in this publication. November 2003 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 5 PASTORAL ............................................................................................................................................ -
EU Project Number 613678
EU project number 613678 Strategies to develop effective, innovative and practical approaches to protect major European fruit crops from pests and pathogens Work package 1. Pathways of introduction of fruit pests and pathogens Deliverable 1.3. PART 7 - REPORT on Oranges and Mandarins – Fruit pathway and Alert List Partners involved: EPPO (Grousset F, Petter F, Suffert M) and JKI (Steffen K, Wilstermann A, Schrader G). This document should be cited as ‘Grousset F, Wistermann A, Steffen K, Petter F, Schrader G, Suffert M (2016) DROPSA Deliverable 1.3 Report for Oranges and Mandarins – Fruit pathway and Alert List’. An Excel file containing supporting information is available at https://upload.eppo.int/download/112o3f5b0c014 DROPSA is funded by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration (grant agreement no. 613678). www.dropsaproject.eu [email protected] DROPSA DELIVERABLE REPORT on ORANGES AND MANDARINS – Fruit pathway and Alert List 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Background on oranges and mandarins ..................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Data on production and trade of orange and mandarin fruit ........................................................................ 5 1.3 Characteristics of the pathway ‘orange and mandarin fruit’ ....................................................................... -
(Eudocima) Materna (L.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on Pomegranate, Punica Granatum
Published online: February 24, 2021 ISSN : 0974-9411 (Print), 2231-5209 (Online) journals.ansfoundation.org Research Article A study on biology and larval behaviour of fruit piercing moth of Othreis (Eudocima) materna (L.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on pomegranate, Punica granatum Eknath Shendge Article Info Department of Zoology, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, Aurangabad- https://doi.org/10.31018/ 431004 (Maharashtra), India jans.v13i1.2489 Bapurao Khaire Received: January 9, 2021 Department of Zoology, Anandrao Dhonde Alias Babaji College, Kada, Dist. Beed-414202 Revised: February 16, 2021 (Maharashtra), India Accepted: February 21, 2021 Ramrao Chavan* Department of Zoology, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, Aurangabad- 431004 (Maharashtra), India *Corresponding author. Email. [email protected] How to Cite Shendge, E. et al. (2021). A study on biology and larval behaviour of fruit piercing moth of Othreis (Eudocima) materna (L.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on pomegranate, Punica granatum. Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 13(1): 178 - 182. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v13i1.2489 Abstract Among different fruit piercing moths, the genus Othreis are the most harmful, causing widespread damage to pomegranate, citrus and mango fruits causing fruit fall in tropical and subtropical countries. The present communication deals with the study on the biology of Othreis materna (L) from egg to adult’s death which was carried out at room temperature of the laboratory to investigate the delicate and vulnerable stages of its life cycle. The life cycle of the moth was completed within 45-61 days, with an average 55.03 days in case of male and within 47-63 days with an average 57.07±4.92 in case of female. -
Natural Parasitoids of Fruit Piercing Moth, Eudocima Spp
Journal of Biological Control, 31(1): 10-12, 2017, DOI: 10.18311/jbc/2017/15557 Research Article Natural parasitoids of fruit piercing moth, Eudocima spp. P. N. MAGAR*, S. R. KULKARNI and A. G. CHANDELE Department of Entomology, Post Graduate Institute, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Dist. Ahmednagar - 413 722, Maharastra, India *Corresponding author E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: Eudocima spp. (Noctuidae) also known as fruit piercing moth, is a serious pest of tropical countries including subtropical Southeast Asia, Australia, and the western Pacific islands. It is found commonly occurring on ripening fruits. Surveys conducted in Ma- harashtra revealed that three abundant larval parasitoids viz., a tachinid fly, Goniophthalmus halli, eulophid wasps, Euplectrus maternus and Tetrastichus sp. were contributing up to 36.65, 41.46 and 36.58 % larval mortality, respectively. Laboratory assays were conducted to test the parasitoids for host specificity by exposing them to larvae of Eudocima sp. However, Goniophthalmus halli showed parasitization on other species of Eudocima, whereas E. maternus was found to be host specific on E. materna. In laboratory investigation, 72 to 89% parasitization of Trichogramma chilonis on the eggs of E. materna was also recorded. KEY WORDS: Eudocima spp., fruit piercing moth, larval parasitoids (Article chronicle: Received: 22.02.2017; Revised: 24.03.2017; Accepted: 31.03.2017) INTRODUCTION enables them to have insufficient contact with chemicals and escapes from knockdown effect. Also adequate holding Adult fruit piercing moth (Eudocima spp.) is a de- period is not achieved as ripe fruits are normally attacked. structive pest of ripening fruits in tropical and subtropical Hence biological control using egg and larval parasitoids countries including India, Africa, Southeast Asia, Australia is a safe and better alternative to manage these fruit pierc- and the South Pacific (Waterhouse and Norris 1987). -
1. Padil Species Factsheet Scientific Name: Common Name Image
1. PaDIL Species Factsheet Scientific Name: Eudocima materna (Linnaeus) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae: Catocalinae) Common Name fruit-piercing moth Live link: http://www.padil.gov.au/pests-and-diseases/Pest/Main/136304 Image Library Australian Biosecurity Live link: http://www.padil.gov.au/pests-and-diseases/ Partners for Australian Biosecurity image library Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment https://www.awe.gov.au/ Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Western Australia https://dpird.wa.gov.au/ Plant Health Australia https://www.planthealthaustralia.com.au/ Museums Victoria https://museumsvictoria.com.au/ 2. Species Information 2.1. Details Specimen Contact: Museum Victoria - [email protected] Author: Walker, K. Citation: Walker, K. (2006) fruit-piercing moth(Eudocima materna)Updated on 2/25/2009 Available online: PaDIL - http://www.padil.gov.au Image Use: Free for use under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY- NC 4.0) 2.2. URL Live link: http://www.padil.gov.au/pests-and-diseases/Pest/Main/136304 2.3. Facets Status: Exotic Species Outbreak in Australia Group: Moths Commodity Overview: Horticulture Commodity Type: Fresh Vegetables, Fresh Fruit, Citrus, Pome fruits, Stone fruits, Berries Distribution: USA and Canada, Central and South America, Africa, South and South-East Asia, Australasian - Oceanian 2.4. Other Names Eudocima apta (Walker) Eudocima chalcogramma (Walker) Eudocima hybrida (Fabricius) Othreis materna (Linnaeus) 2.5. Diagnostic Notes The adult moth has fawn forewings with a variable pattern of pale and dark lines and patches. The hind wings are bright yellow to orange, with a broad dark border and a dark spot in the middle. -
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA § 319.56–21
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA § 319.56–21 a declaration certifying that the prod- with this section and all other applica- ucts were grown in a greenhouse in the ble provisions of this subpart. exporting country on Honshu Island or (a) Inspection and treatment for pests of north thereof. the family Tortricidae. An inspector (xiii) Only precleared consignments must take a biometrically designed that have been treated in accordance sample from each lot of apples or pears with part 305 of this chapter are au- that are offered for entry into the thorized. The consignment must be ac- United States. If inspection of the sam- companied by a PPQ Form 203 signed ple discloses that pests of the family by the APHIS inspector on site in the Tortricidae (fruit-leaf roller moths) are exporting country. not present in the lot sampled, the (xiv) Must be accompanied by a fruit may be imported without treat- phytosanitary certificate issued by the ment. If any such pests are found upon national plant protection organization inspection, the lot must be treated of Israel that declares ‘‘These tomatoes with methyl bromide as prescribed in were grown in registered greenhouses part 305 of this chapter. in the Arava Valley of Israel.’’ (b) Treatment of apples and pears from (xv) Must be treated in accordance Australia for fruit flies. (1) Apples from with part 305 of this chapter. Australia (including Tasmania) may be imported without treatment for the (xvi) Must be accompanied by a following fruit flies if they are im- phytosanitary certificate issued by the ported from an area in Australia that national plant protection organization meets the requirements of § 319.56–5 for of the country of origin and with an ad- pest freedom: Mediterranean fruit fly ditional declaration stating that the (Ceratitis capitata), the Queensland fruit fruit is free from Cnephasia jactatana, fly (Bactrocera tryoni), Bactrocera Coscinoptycha improbana, Ctenopseustis aquilonis, and B. -
Pheromone Production, Male Abundance, Body Size, and the Evolution of Elaborate Antennae in Moths Matthew R
Pheromone production, male abundance, body size, and the evolution of elaborate antennae in moths Matthew R. E. Symonds1,2, Tamara L. Johnson1 & Mark A. Elgar1 1Department of Zoology, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia 2Centre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia. Keywords Abstract Antennal morphology, forewing length, Lepidoptera, phylogenetic generalized least The males of some species of moths possess elaborate feathery antennae. It is widely squares, sex pheromone. assumed that these striking morphological features have evolved through selection for males with greater sensitivity to the female sex pheromone, which is typically Correspondence released in minute quantities. Accordingly, females of species in which males have Matthew R. E. Symonds, School of Life and elaborate (i.e., pectinate, bipectinate, or quadripectinate) antennae should produce Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, 221 the smallest quantities of pheromone. Alternatively, antennal morphology may Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia. Tel: +61 3 9251 7437; Fax: +61 3 be associated with the chemical properties of the pheromone components, with 9251 7626; E-mail: elaborate antennae being associated with pheromones that diffuse more quickly (i.e., [email protected] have lower molecular weights). Finally, antennal morphology may reflect population structure, with low population abundance selecting for higher sensitivity and hence Funded by a Discovery Project grant from the more elaborate antennae. We conducted a phylogenetic comparative analysis to test Australian Research Council (DP0987360). these explanations using pheromone chemical data and trapping data for 152 moth species. Elaborate antennae are associated with larger body size (longer forewing Received: 13 September 2011; Revised: 23 length), which suggests a biological cost that smaller moth species cannot bear. -
Developing an Attractant for Monitoring Fruit-Feeding Moths in Citrus Orchards
Developing an attractant for monitoring fruit-feeding moths in citrus orchards A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE of RHODES UNIVERSITY by Mathew Keith Goddard February 2016 Abstract Fruit-piercing moths are a sporadic pest of citrus, especially in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa, where the adults can cause significant damage in outbreak years. Currently the only way in which to successfully control fruit-feeding moths within the orchards is the use of repellent lights. However, growers confuse fruit-piercing moths with fruit-sucking moths that don‘t cause primary damage, and there is no way of monitoring which moth species are attacking the fruit in the orchards during the night. In a previous study, banana was shown to be the most attractive bait for a variety of fruit-feeding moth species. Therefore the aim of this study was to determine the population dynamics of fruit-feeding moths develop a cost- effective alternative to the use of fresh banana as a bait for fruit-piercing moths. Fresh banana was compared to nine alternative synthetic attractants, frozen banana and a control under field conditions in several orchards in the Eastern Cape Province. Once again, banana was shown to be the most attractive bait. Some 23 species of fruit-feeding moth species were sampled in the traps, but there was only two fruit-piercing species, Serrodes partita (Fabricius) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and Eudocima sp. Surprisingly S. partita, which was thought to be the main pest, comprised only 6.9% of trap catches. Serrodes partita, is a sporadic pest, only becoming problematic every five to 10 years after good rainfall in the Little Karoo region that causes flushes of their larval host, wild plum, Pappea capensis (Ecklon & Zeyher).