DOCSLIB.ORG

Dual Change of Command

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dual Change of Command 3 August 2018 NATO Skywatch 1 Volume 34, No. 7 • 3 August 2018 Dual Change of Command Supreme Allied Commander Europe General Curtis Scaparrotti, Major General Dawn Dunlop, Major General Jörg Lebert, Brigadier General Karsten Stoye and Brigadier General Brian McDaniel gathered in Geilenkirchen, on Friday, 20 July for the dual change of command ceremony of the NAEW&C Force and NAEW&CF E-3A Component. Article continues at page 8/9 E-3A Club Personnel recognized Photo by Melanie Becker The E-3A Club Personnel received the Commanders coin for their successful efforts and numerous achievements. Over 450 events were organized by the E-3A Club since the beginning of 2017. Some fact & figures: - 140 conferences meetings - 60 social events - 45 VIP events - 120 PAO visits and tours - 65 official military events - 24 First Thursdays 3 August 2018 NATO Skywatch 3 With the Commander’s Corner, our NAEW&C Force Commander and E-3A Commander give the opportunity to wing and squadron commanders, and branch and division heads to share their thoughts about current topics of interest to NATO Air Base Geilenkirchen. Every month a different writer will highlight a specific topic concerning their respective discipline. On 11 December 1576, after of Assurance Measures; while a by the Commanders of the NAEW&C in workforce allocated to the five years of being imprisoned split mission executes two different Force (E-3A and E-3D) and the management of such a programme. at Valladolid by the Spanish tasks, one inside the Implementation NAGS Force (Global Hawk), has An improvement project aimed Inquisition, Friar Luis de Leon was Area and one outside with different been established to provide system to design, develop and test a cleared of all charges and released timeframes. operators and stakeholders with new Headquarters Inspection from prison with an admonishment a forum to review common issues Program process along with its to be more careful and reserved On the exercise side I have to related to the employment of both related inspection organizational in his writing and speech. On highlight Exercise STEADFAST weapons systems in support of NATO structure, meeting the current level 29 January 1577, he began his COBALT 18 (SFCT18). The aim of authorized operations. The Working of ambition, was started in 2017 university lecture with the words SFCT18 was to test, evaluate and Group is co-chaired by FHC, with and we have already successfully Dicebamus hesterna die (“As we validate interoperability and C4ISR liaison from AIRCOM, NAPMA, NCIA completed inspections at FOL were saying yesterday....”). support to the NATO Command and NSPA. The primary areas of work Oerland and FOB Trapani. and Force Structures. In previous are to: provide advice to the respective Fortunately, I have not been in years, the NAEW&CF participated force commanders for capability I don’t want to finish this prison last year but unfortunately, in the SFCT series of exercises with development; identify coordination Commander’s Corner article without I do not have the talents of the limited participation, providing only and interoperability opportunities; praising the extraordinary work Spanish poet, nevertheless I hope a few sorties to the exercise live and to identify and mitigate potential accomplished by CIS Plans & Policy I will not be accused of careless phase. At SFCT18 our involvement interoperability shortfalls. Branch at FHC and CIS Squadron speech and so pass the next year in was completely different. Force at the E-3A Component. Every day prison! HQ, following guidance from FCC, Additional work areas related to they prove their value at the MOB introduced a multi-domain digital operational employment (CONEMP, and FOBs/FOL. At MOB Building The Capability, Standards and interoperability approach to the TTP development) and Concept 76, more than 5600 accounts CIS Division (FHC) is a small part exercise design. Multi-level cross- Development and Experimentation are provided with IT services of a team playing like World domain information exchange using (CD&E) will be developed. A CONEMP in an extremely cost-effective Champions every day. Last year our Ground Entry Point at the MOB is a high-level document, describing way. Improvement of our cyber- proved once again that even if was provided quickly and reliably recommended employment options security posture and resilience of our team is ageing and reduced, through the Information Exchange at operational and tactical levels of our networks are our priorities, we continue to be winners in Gateway. Also, during this exercise, a execution. A CONEMP can inform the sometimes it creates ennui as a the Alliance competition. From small NAEW&CF CIS and OPS team was development of TTPs and SOPs related result of mandatory maintenance an operational point of view, we deployed to Kaunas, Lithuania and to the employment of a capability or actions, however, I think the level had big challenges to face during hosted by the Spanish JFAC. system. It also provides guidance to of user satisfaction has been greatly the second half of 2017 and the initial CD&E related to the capability improved. first half of 2018, with our tail SFCT 18 has been a first step to fulfil or system, leading to the identification availability at a historical minimum a task from SACEUR to create Strategic of technical and operational capability Friar Luis de Leon will not approve due to the modernization of our Air C2 Objectives, with the aim to gaps. This information is then FHC actions during the last year aircraft fleet. It required a big exercise multi-domain, multi-level used to update operational Tactics, as we have been so far from the effort, imagination and prudent secure communications in order to Techniques and Procedures (TTPs) and hidden path. planning to limit expectations identify and remove technical and validate operational and technical during this challenging period. procedural barriers. Our inputs will be requirements. NAEW&C – NAGS How tranquil is the life included inside a key NATO document, interoperability will require a new Of him who, shunning the vain The team work between AIRCOM, SACEUR’s Annual Guidance for CONEMP and eventually new TTPs at world’s uproar, CAOCs, Force Headquarters and Education and Training for 2020. Key the NAEW&C Force. May follow, free from strife, Components (A and D) has exercises are going to be selected in The hidden path, of yore been extraordinary and flexible, 2019 to expand on the achievements During the first semester of 2018, Trod by the few who conned true introducing concepts such as split of SFCT18. FHC has also implemented a new wisdom’s lore! and combined missions that have Inspection Programme. The former proved very successful. A combined An NAEW&C – NATO Alliance Ground Inspection Programme was no longer mission executes more than one Surveillance (NAGS) Interoperability sustainable as a consequence of the task in the Implementation Area Working Group, sponsored directly Force Review and the drastic reduction HQ NAEW&C Force Commander Atlantic Treaty Organization. The appearance of advertising in this publication, including Maj. Gen. Jörg Lebert inserts or supplements, does not constitute an endorsement by NATO of the products or services advertised. Submissions are due seven days before publication and may be edited Volume 34, No. 7 3 August 2018 Chief, Public Affairs for style and space. Email inputs to [email protected]. Maj. Johannes Glowka NATO Skywatch is an authorized, unofficial For paid advertisements call Hub Durlinger Media at +31 (0)46 4529292, commercial enterprise newspaper published Editor cellphone +31 (0)6 5472 6473, [email protected] or Houx Digiprint under exclusive written agreement with the Capt. Albert van Dam at +31 (0)46 4582111, [email protected] NAEW&CF E-3A Component by HOUX DIGIPRINT, Arendstraat 3, 6135 KT Sittard, +31 (0)46 4582111. Opinions expressed by contributors are Articles may be reproduced after permission has been obtained from the editor, provided their own and do not necessarily reflect the official views of, or endorsement by, the North mention is made of NATO Skywatch. To read the NATO Skywatch online visit www.awacs.nato.int Rumpenerstraat 49 6443 CC Brunssum Phone +31 (0)45 564 01 58 www.elcomal.nl ANIMAL HOTEL ABDISSENBOSCH D New cat-place where your cat can Opening hours: move freely. Roomy outside place, Monday-Saturday 08:00-12:00 and A playgrounds, central heated. 16:00-19:00 hrs. Y Grooming salon, also Do-It-Yourself Sundays and holidays closed for C wash salon for pets. bringing in or picking-up. A FOR 41 YEARS THE ADDRESS WHERE YOUR PET FEELS AT HOME R Vogelzankweg 230 • NL-6374AH AH Landgraaf • phone +31 (0)45 5317217 E www.dierenhotelabdissenbosch.nl (also in English und auch im Deutsch) This could have been your advertisement TAX FREE SHOPPING AT BIG CHOICE IN FASHION AND SHOES FOR MEN AND WOMEN OF ALL AGES AND SIZES SITTARD • RIJKSWEG NOORD 22 [ ENTRANCE TROUGH FREE PARKINGGARAGE AT WALRAMSTRAAT 18] ROERMOND • NASSAUSTRAAT 80 ( FOLLOW H LAURENTIUS ) 3 August 2018 NATO Skywatch 5 NAEW&C Force member Captain Amanda Zenner receives the Allied Command Operations Military Member of the Year Award responsibilities and leadership prior to her assignment to the NAEW&C Logistic Support Squadron. Here, she demonstrated the superior performance and the professional excellence that this award recognizes. Despite her accomplishments, her words are a testimony of how team work and humility are the very basis of any success: “I have had Story by Andrea Francesca Franzini the opportunity to meet several Photo by PAO JFC Naples of my peers working across Allied Command Operations. Their work and On Thursday, 21 June, the accomplishments leave me in awe. leadership and the team here at To be recognized at this level when Geilenkirchen were given a reason there are so many other deserving for pride and a confirmation of individuals is truly humbling.” the value of our personnel, as United States Air Force Captain The ACO Military Member of the Year Amanda Zenner was presented with Award program was established in the Allied Command Operations 2013 and only recognizes junior Military Member of the Year Award.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • U.S.-South Korea Relations
    U.S.-South Korea Relations Mark E. Manyin, Coordinator Specialist in Asian Affairs Emma Chanlett-Avery Specialist in Asian Affairs Mary Beth D. Nikitin Specialist in Nonproliferation Brock R. Williams Analyst in International Trade and Finance Jonathan R. Corrado Research Associate May 23, 2017 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R41481 U.S.-South Korea Relations Summary Overview South Korea (officially the Republic of Korea, or ROK) is one of the United States’ most important strategic and economic partners in Asia. Congressional interest in South Korea is driven by both security and trade interests. Since the early 1950s, the U.S.-ROK Mutual Defense Treaty commits the United States to help South Korea defend itself. Approximately 28,500 U.S. troops are based in the ROK, which is included under the U.S. “nuclear umbrella.” Washington and Seoul cooperate in addressing the challenges posed by North Korea. The two countries’ economies are joined by the Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA). South Korea is the United States’ seventh-largest trading partner and the United States is South Korea’s second- largest trading partner. Between 2009 and the end of 2016, relations between the two countries arguably reached their most robust state in decades. Political changes in both countries in 2017, however, have generated uncertainty about the state of the relationship. Coordination of North Korea Policy Dealing with North Korea is the dominant strategic concern of the relationship. The Trump Administration appears to have raised North Korea’s nuclear and missile programs to a top U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Officer at Work: Leadership
    CHAPTER FIVE The Officer at Work: Leadership . before it is an honor, leadership is trust; Before it is a call to glory, Leadership is a call to service; . before all else, forever and always, leadership is a willingness to serve. —Father Edson Wood, OSA, Cadet Catholic Chaplain Invocation at Assumption of Command by BG Curtis Scaparrotti, Commandant of Cadets, U.S. Military Academy August 11, 2004 Leadership—convincing others to collaborate effectively in a common endeavor—is the primary function of all Armed Forces officers. Only a few officers are commanders at any particular moment, but every officer is a leader. Indeed the Army and Marine Corps insist that lead- ership is the common responsibility of every Soldier and Marine.1 The Air Force says “Any Airman can be a leader and can positively influ- ence those around him or her to accomplish the mission.”2 A conse- quence is that almost every officer considers himself or herself good at leadership, but perspectives on method differ depending on individual circumstances and experiences. This chapter discusses leadership from four different but overlapping viewpoints: accomplishing the mission and taking care of the troops; three concepts of leadership; Service approaches; and “tribal wisdom,” views of leadership expressed by senior professionals. 57 Accomplishing the Mission and Taking Care of the Troops Leaders are expected to guide their followers to mission success at least possible cost. Lord Moran, who served as a medical officer on the Western Front in World War I, and was Churchill’s doctor and con- fidant in World War II, defined leadership as “the capacity to frame plans which will succeed and the faculty of persuading others to carry them out in the face of death.”3 Moran was skeptical of a requirement for fine character, the honorable virtues, in a leader, but found that a reputation for achieving success was the essential middle term between the ability to formulate a course of action and persuading others to implement it.
    [Show full text]
  • NATO-Russia Relations: the Background
    North Atlantic Treaty Organization www.nato.int/factsheets Media Backgrounder April 2018 NATO-Russia Relations: The Background The end of the Cold War was a turning point in Europe’s history. From 1991, NATO began to work hard to establish a strategic partnership with Russia. However, in March 2014, Russia illegally annexed Crimea. In response, NATO suspended all practical cooperation with Russia, while keeping political and military channels of communication open. This factsheet sets out the key dates and events in the relationship. 1994: The Partnership for Peace In June 1994, Russia became the first country to join NATO’s Partnership for Peace (PfP), a programme of practical bilateral cooperation between NATO and partner countries. The Brussels Summit Declaration defined the goals of PfP as expanding and intensifying political and military cooperation in Europe, increasing stability, diminishing threats to peace, and building strengthened security relationships. 1997: The NATO-Russia Founding Act On 27 May 1997, NATO leaders and President Boris Yeltsin signed the NATO-Russia Founding Act, expressing their determination to “build together a lasting and inclusive peace in the Euro-Atlantic area on the principles of democracy and cooperative security.” The Act established the goal of cooperation in areas such as peacekeeping, arms control, counter-terrorism, counter-narcotics and theatre missile defence. In the Founding Act, NATO and Russia agreed to base their cooperation on the principles of human rights and civil liberties, refraining from the threat or use of force against each other or any other state. With the Signing of NATO-Russia Founding Act, 27 May 1997 illegal annexation of Crimea, the territory of a sovereign state, Russia violated the Founding Act.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S.-China Military Contacts: Issues for Congress
    U.S.-China Military Contacts: Issues for Congress Shirley A. Kan Specialist in Asian Security Affairs October 27, 2014 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL32496 U.S.-China Military Contacts: Issues for Congress Summary This CRS Report, updated through the 113th Congress, discusses policy issues regarding military- to-military (mil-to-mil) contacts with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and records major contacts and crises since 1993. The United States suspended military contacts with China and imposed sanctions on arms sales in response to the Tiananmen Crackdown in 1989. In 1993, President Clinton reengaged with the top PRC leadership, including China’s military, the People’s Liberation Army (PLA). Renewed military exchanges with the PLA have not regained the closeness reached in the 1980s, when U.S.-PRC strategic alignment against the Soviet Union included U.S. arms sales to China. Improvements and deteriorations in overall bilateral engagement have affected military contacts, which were close in 1997-1998 and 2000, but marred by the 1995-1996 Taiwan Strait crisis, mistaken NATO bombing of a PRC embassy in 1999, the EP-3 aircraft collision crisis in 2001, and the PLA’s aggressive maritime and air confrontations. Issues for Congress include whether the Administration complies with legislation overseeing dealings with the PLA and pursues contacts with the PLA that advance a prioritized set of U.S. security interests, especially the operational safety of U.S. military personnel. Oversight legislation includes the Foreign Relations Authorization Act for FY1990-FY1991 (P.L. 101-246) and National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for FY2000 (P.L.
    [Show full text]
  • One Flank, One Threat, One Presence
    ONE FLANK, ONECenter for EuropeanTHREAT, Policy Analysis ONE PRESENCE A Strategy for NATO’s Eastern Flank LTG (Ret.) Ben Hodges Janusz Bugajski COL (Ret.) Ray Wojcik Carsten Schmiedl 2 May 2020 Center for European Policy Analysis All opinions are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the position or views of the institutions they represent or the Center for European Policy Analysis. About CEPA The Center for European Policy Analysis (CEPA) is a 501(c)(3), non-profit, non-partisan, public policy research institute. Our mission is to promote an economically vibrant, strategically secure, and politically free Europe with close and enduring ties to the United States. Our analytical team consists of the world’s leading experts on Central-East Europe, Russia, and its neighbors. Through cutting- edge research, analysis, and programs we provide fresh insight on energy, security, and defense to government officials and agencies; we help transatlantic businesses navigate changing strategic landscapes; and we build networks of future Atlanticist leaders. © 2020 by the Center for European Policy Analysis, Washington, DC. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without permission in writing from the Center for European Policy Analysis, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in news articles, critical articles, or reviews. Center for European Policy Analysis 1275 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Suite 400 Washington, DC 20004 E-mail: [email protected] www.cepa.org Cover image: Standing NATO Maritime Group Two and Standing NATO Mine Countermeasures Group Two in the Black Sea in 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • United States European Command: Overview and Key Issues
    March 12, 2019 United States European Command: Overview and Key Issues History USEUCOM’s Current Geopolitical United States European Command (or EUCOM, Challenges pronounced “YEW-com”) is headquartered in Stuttgart, Events in recent years, particularly since 2014, have tested, Germany, and was established in 1952. Today its area of if not undermined, the strategic assumptions underpinning responsibility comprises 51 countries stretching from EUCOM’s posture. To Europe’s east, Russia annexed Portugal’s Azores Islands to Iceland and Israel. Crimea, began a proxy war in Eastern Ukraine, and is USEUCOM’s commander is currently U.S. Army General modernizing its conventional and nonconventional forces. Curtis Scaparrotti, who is simultaneously NATO’s Supreme Russia also increased its military activities in Europe’s high Allied Commander, Europe (SACEUR). During the Cold north, particularly through reportedly adding nuclear- War, the European theater was a primary focus for U.S. capable missiles to Kaliningrad (a Russian territory on the defense and national security and EUCOM was focused Baltic Sea that is not contiguous with Russia itself), almost exclusively on deterring, and if necessary defeating, enhancing its air patrolling activities close to other states’ the Soviet Union. At the height of the Cold War, there were airspace, and enhancing its naval presence in the Baltic Sea, more than 400,000 U.S. troops stationed in Europe. the Arctic Ocean, and the North Sea. Taken together, these moves have heightened some congressional concerns about The collapse of the Soviet Union led to a withdrawal of the Russian aggression and its implications for NATO bulk of forward-deployed U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Joint Communiqué the Official Newsletter for the Faos, International Relations Specialists, and Partners Associated with the FAOA Korea Chapter
    OCT. 2020 | VOL. 1, ISSUE 1 The Joint Communiqué The Official Newsletter for the FAOs, International Relations Specialists, and Partners associated with the FAOA Korea Chapter A Message from the President INSIDE THIS ISSUE Fellow FAOs, International Relations Specialists, and Partners, The Challenges & Opportunities 2 One of the most important building blocks of a strong alliance is great of Serving as a 48P in Korea leadership. To this end, the FAOA Korea Chapter was founded in July 2020 with the mission to develop and inspire leaders engaged in the advancement of the Republic of Korea (ROK)-United States (U.S.) Alliance. The FAOA A Message from LTC(R) Steve Tharp 2 Korea Chapter is a 501(c)-19 non-profit organization, consisting primarily of current and former FAOs and International Relations Specialists who advance the ROK-U.S. A Heartfelt Fragment of Alliance 3-4 Alliance through events and activities that promote mentorship, education, research, and History to be Remembered connection. Its membership also extends to leaders and professionals that are not FAOs or International Relations Specialists, as long as those individuals are members of an organization that aligns with the mission and core values of the FAOA Korea Chapter. The core values of A New Defense Era of Strategic 4 “commitment to leader development” and “pursuit of inspiration” guide the actions of members Technologies and Defense Innovation and represent the foundation of the organization. Many organizations that develop leaders or advance the ROK-U.S. Alliance already exist, but the FAOA Korea Chapter is the only one that leverages the strengths of the FAO community to accomplish both efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • NATO TAKES the FIFTH Alan W
    ESSAY NATO TAKES THE FIFTH ALan W. Dowd Map of NATO membership. Source: Wikimedia Commons. he purpose of the North Atlantic Treaty is “to promote stability and Twell-being in the North Atlantic area” and “to safeguard the freedom, common heritage and civilization” of its signatories. Toward that end, Article II of into something of a global NATO to the dangers posed by the treaty that gave birth to gendarme: Between 1995 and Moscow, but Vladimir Putin’s NATO commits members of 2011, NATO stamped out eth- Russia had been threatening the alliance to “encourage eco- nic-cleansing in Bosnia and NATO interests and NATO nomic collaboration.” Article III Kosovo, deployed peacekeepers members for more than a calls on members to “maintain to those Balkan battlegrounds, decade. and develop their…capacity to marched into Afghanistan to resist armed attack.” Article fight al Qaeda and the Taliban, In 2001, for example, Russia IX creates a political council formed the basis of multina- laid claim to half the Arctic and a military committee to tional armadas to intercept Circle, disregarding the in- shape the common defense. weapons of mass destruction terests of the United States, Article X allows for expansion (WMDs) on the high seas and to Canada, Denmark, Norway, of the alliance, which was once combat piracy, airlifted African and Iceland—NATO members a club of 12 nations clustered Union peacekeepers, trained all—and underlining its claims around the Atlantic Ocean but Iraqi soldiers, and prevented in a brazen military context: now encompasses a wide swath a Bosnia-style bloodletting in In 2008, a Russian general re- vealed plans to train “troops of the northern hemisphere— Libya.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ARMED FORCES OFFICER by Richard M
    THE ARMED FORCES OFFICER by Richard M. Swain and Albert C. Pierce The Armed Forces Officer THE ARMED FORCES OFFICER by Richard M. Swain and Albert C. Pierce National Defense University Press Washington, D.C. 2017 Published in the United States by National Defense University Press. Portions of this book may be quoted or reprinted without permission, provided that a standard source credit line is included. NDU Press would appreciate a courtesy copy of reprints or reviews. Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the contributors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Defense Department or any other agency of the Federal Government. Cleared for public release; distribution unlimited. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A catalog record of this publication may be found at the Library of Congress. Book design by Jessica Craney, U.S. Government Printing Office, Creative Services Division Published by National Defense University Press 260 Fifth Avenue (Building 64) Suite 2500 Fort Lesley J. McNair Washington, DC 20319 U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL EDITION NOTICE Use of ISBN This is the official U.S. Government edition of this publication and is herein identified to certify its authenticity. Use of 978-0-16-093758-3 is for the U.S. Government Publishing Office Edition only. The Superintendent of Documents of the U.S. Government Publishing Office requests that any reprinted edition clearly be labeled as a copy of the authentic work with a new ISBN. Contents FOREWORD by General Joseph F. Dunford, Jr., U.S. Marine Corps, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff ...............................................................................ix PREFACE by Major General Frederick M.
    [Show full text]
  • Türk Dış Politikası Yıllığı, Elinizdeki Eser Ile Birlikte Sekizinci Kitabına Ulaşmış Bulunmaktadır
    2016 2016 009 yılında yayın hayatına başlayan Türk Dış Politikası Yıllığı, elinizdeki eser ile birlikte sekizinci kitabına ulaşmış bulunmaktadır. Şimdiden kendi alanında bir klasik haline gelen bu seri ile özellikle Türk dış politikası Türk Dış ile2 ilgilenen araştırmacılar için kalıcı bir başvuru kaynağının ortaya çıkarılması amaçlanmıştır. Türk Dış Politikası Yıllığı bu sayıda 2016 yılı gelişmelerinin ele Politikası alındığı on altı makale ile dört bağımsız makaleden oluşmaktadır. Birinci bölümde Suriye krizine ilişkin Türkiye’nin pozisyonu ve manevraları ile 15 Temmuz başarısız darbe girişimi bağlamında Batı’nın Türkiye’ye yaklaşımı ve politikalarına dair bağımsız Yıllığı makaleler yer almaktadır. Ufuk Ulutaş ve Burhanettin Duran’ın YILLIĞI TÜRK DIŞ POLİTİKASI “Türkiye’nin DEAŞ’la Mücadelesinin Kritik Dönemeci: Fırat Kalkanı Editörler: Burhanettin Duran, Kemal İnat, Mustafa Caner Harekatı” başlıklı makalesiyle başlayan bu bölümde sırasıyla Ömer Yılmaz’ın “Batı’nın Türkiye Politikaları: Terör ve Batı”, Ramazan Erdağ’ın “Türkiye’de Darbeler ve Batı’nın Yaklaşımı” ve İsmail Ediz’in “Reel Politik ve Oryantalizm Sarmalında Batı’nın Türkiye Algısı” isimli makaleleri bulunmaktadır. Türk dış politikasının değişik alanlarına ilişkin 2016 yılında yaşanan gelişmelerin ele alındığı ikinci bölümde Türkiye’nin Ortadoğu ülkelerine yönelik politikaları Kemal İnat, Mustafa Caner, Recep Tayyip Gürler, Zana Baykal, Can Acun, İsmail Numan Telci, İsmail Akdoğan, Ahmet Üçağaç ve Haydar Oruç tarafından kaleme alınan altı ayrı makalede analiz edilmiştir. ABD ile ilişkiler Kılıç Buğra Kanat, AB ile ilişkiler Filiz Cicioğlu ve Türkiye’nin 2016 yılındaki Rusya ve Kafkasya Politikası da Özgür Tüfekçi tarafından yazılmıştır. Yine Türkiye’nin 2016 yılındaki Kıbrıs politikası Enes Bayraklı ve Hacı Mehmet Boyraz, Balkanlar politikası Mehmet Uğur Ekinci ve Nedim Emin, Afrika politikası Abdurrahim Sıradağ, Orta Asya ve Pakistan politikası Tamer Kaşıkçı, Asya Pasifik politikası Kadir Temiz ve Latin Amerika politikası da Mustafa Yetim tarafından kaleme alınmıştır.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan Study Group Final Report
    Afghanistan Study Group Final Report FEBRUARY 2021 AFGHANISTAN STUDY GROUP Members of the Afghanistan Study Group Co-chairs Senator Kelly A. Ayotte General Joseph F. Dunford Jr. (Ret.) Ms. Nancy Lindborg Study Group Members Ms. Nisha Biswal Ms. Susan Gordon Mr. David Miliband Ambassador James Dobbins Ambassador Mark Green Ms. Lisa Monaco Senator Joe Donnelly Ambassador Marc Grossman Dr. Meghan O’Sullivan Ms. Michèle Flournoy Mr. Stephen J. Hadley General Curtis Scaparrotti (Ret.) This report, which was drafted in December 2020 and January 2021, represents the consensus of a bipartisan and independent Study Group with diverse expertise and affiliations. No member may be satisfied with every formulation and argument in isolation. The findings of this report are solely those of the Afghanistan Study Group. They do not necessarily represent the views of the United States Institute of Peace or the senior advisers who contributed their time and expertise to the deliberations of the Group and the content of this report. All members and senior advisers participated in their personal capacity and on a volunteer basis. Cover includes artwork by Pyty/Shutterstock. Maps on pages 5 and 7 created by Lucidity Information Design. United States Institute of Peace 2301 Constitution Avenue NW Washington, DC 20037 Phone: 202.457.1700 Fax: 202.429.6063 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www . usip.org Making Peace Possible Afghanistan Study Group Final Report A Pathway for Peace in Afghanistan FEBRUARY 2021 Contents Letter from the Co-chairs ........................................ 2 Recommendations ................................................ 47 1. Clarify the End State .................................................... 47 Executive Summary ................................................. 4 2. Reinforce the Conditionality of a Final U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • NATO at 70 Washington Treaty
    róbert ondrejcsák PANORAMA SPECIAL EDITION OF PANORAMA OF THE GLOBAL SECURITY ENVIRONMENT 2019 For more than thirteen years, Panorama of Global Security Environ- Tyler. H. Lippert (eds.) ment has brought quality analysis with inside knowledge written by experienced authors from various areas of employment. It is one of the most prestigious annual or bi-annual publications with a focus on European security, NATO, advanced technologies, new security threats and geopolitics. The goal of Panorama has always been to provide both scholars and decision-makers with up-to-date analysis of the trends and issues of the global security environment. Throughout its history, the book has attracted a wide readership and it has published texts by authors from all the continents. Since 2012, Panorama is indexed in the prestigious Thomson Reuters Web of Science Book Citation Index. Every Panorama issue is publicly available online on the STRATPOL webpage. Slovakia celebrated 15 years in NATO along with six of its allies. It was the sixth enlargement and still remains as NATO’s largest. Apart from that, NATO is celebrating 70 years since the signature of the NATO at 70 Washington Treaty. Therefore, Panorama 2019 is fully devoted to NATO, its current role in the international architecture, but also to finding gaps in the relationship of Slovakia towards the Alliance. NATO is the longest serving defense alliance in modern history. None of the authors argued this will change soon and although they raised important critical points to some of NATO’s policies, the overwhelming consensus is that this tumultuous period would be much harder to cope with without NATO.
    [Show full text]