THE ARMED FORCES OFFICER by Richard M
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
PROMOTION REQUIREMENTS for CAP Members
PROMOTION REQUIREMENTS for CAP Members BY JOHN W. TALBOTT, Lt Col, CAP NEBRASKA WING Developed on 03/15/02 Update on 26 February 2006 AIR FORCE OFFICER RANKS Colonel (O-6) (Col) Second Lieutenant (O-1) (2nd Lt) st Brigadier General (O-7) (Brig Gen) First Lieutenant (O-2) (1 Lt) Captain (O-3) (Capt) Major General (08) (Maj Gen) Major (O-4) (Maj) Army Air Corps Lieutenant Colonel (O-5) (Lt Col) AIR FORCE NCO RANKS Chief Master Sergeant (E-9) (CMsgt) Senior Master Sergeant (E-8) (SMsgt) Master Sergeant (E-7) (Msgt) Technical Sergeant (E-6) (Tsgt) Staff Sergeant (E-5) (Ssgt) CAP Flight Officers Rank Flight Officer: Technical Flight Officer Senior Flight Officer NOTE: The following is a compilation of CAP Regulation 50-17 and CAP 35-5. It is provided as a quick way of evaluating the promotion and training requirements for CAP members, and is not to be treated as an authoritative document, but instead it is provided to assist CAP members in understanding how the two different regulations are inter-related. Since regulations change from time to time, it is recommended that an individual using this document consult the actual regulations when an actual promotion is being evaluated or submitted. Individual section of the pertinent regulations are included, and marked. John W. Talbott, Lt Col, CAP The following are the requirements for various specialty tracks. (Example: promotion to the various ranks for senior Personnel, Cadet Programs, etc.) members in Civil Air Patrol (CAP): For promotion to SFO, one needs to complete 18 months as a TFO, (See CAPR 35-5 for further details.) and have completed level 2: (Attend Squadron Leadership School, complete Initially, all Civil Air Patrol the CAP Officer course ECI Course 13 members who are 18 years or older are or military equivalent, and completes the considered senior members, (with no requirements for a Technician rating in a senior member rank worn), when they specialty track (this is completed for join Civil Air Patrol. -
AUGUST 2021 May 2019: Admiral Sir Timothy P. Fraser
ADMIRALS: AUGUST 2021 May 2019: Admiral Sir Timothy P. Fraser: Vice-Chief of the Defence Staff, May 2019 June 2019: Admiral Sir Antony D. Radakin: First Sea Lord and Chief of the Naval Staff, June 2019 (11/1965; 55) VICE-ADMIRALS: AUGUST 2021 February 2016: Vice-Admiral Sir Benjamin J. Key: Chief of Joint Operations, April 2019 (11/1965; 55) July 2018: Vice-Admiral Paul M. Bennett: to retire (8/1964; 57) March 2019: Vice-Admiral Jeremy P. Kyd: Fleet Commander, March 2019 (1967; 53) April 2019: Vice-Admiral Nicholas W. Hine: Second Sea Lord and Deputy Chief of the Naval Staff, April 2019 (2/1966; 55) Vice-Admiral Christopher R.S. Gardner: Chief of Materiel (Ships), April 2019 (1962; 58) May 2019: Vice-Admiral Keith E. Blount: Commander, Maritime Command, N.A.T.O., May 2019 (6/1966; 55) September 2020: Vice-Admiral Richard C. Thompson: Director-General, Air, Defence Equipment and Support, September 2020 July 2021: Vice-Admiral Guy A. Robinson: Chief of Staff, Supreme Allied Command, Transformation, July 2021 REAR ADMIRALS: AUGUST 2021 July 2016: (Eng.)Rear-Admiral Timothy C. Hodgson: Director, Nuclear Technology, July 2021 (55) October 2017: Rear-Admiral Paul V. Halton: Director, Submarine Readiness, Submarine Delivery Agency, January 2020 (53) April 2018: Rear-Admiral James D. Morley: Deputy Commander, Naval Striking and Support Forces, NATO, April 2021 (1969; 51) July 2018: (Eng.) Rear-Admiral Keith A. Beckett: Director, Submarines Support and Chief, Strategic Systems Executive, Submarine Delivery Agency, 2018 (Eng.) Rear-Admiral Malcolm J. Toy: Director of Operations and Assurance and Chief Operating Officer, Defence Safety Authority, and Director (Technical), Military Aviation Authority, July 2018 (12/1964; 56) November 2018: (Logs.) Rear-Admiral Andrew M. -
Shuckerow-Pasek July 29, at the Church
The weather Variable cloudiness today. High temperatures in the mid 70s, 25 C. Mostly cloudy tonight. Lows in the irtid 50s. Tuesday cloudy with chance of oc lianrhpatf r Eupnitig B m lb casional light rain developing. Highs in the mid 70s. Probability of rain 10 percent today, 20 per A Family ISEWSpaper Since 1881 cent tonight and 50 percent Tuesday. Winds / becoming east to southeast about 10 mph today Vol. XCVII, No. 232 — Manchester, Cong., Monday, July 3, 1978 Home delivered copy 15 cents continuing tonight. East to northeast winds 10 to Newsstand copy 20 cents 15 mph Tuesday. National weather map on page Syrians, Christians fighting in Lebanon BEIRUT, Lebanon ( U P D - Syrian There are. fires in some of them. L’Orient-Le Jour estimated that peacekeeping troops and Christian Nobody is on the streets.” more than 2,000 shells fell on the militiamen exchanged gunfire and An official of the right-wing Ashrafieh neighborhood alone Sun artillery today in the third straight National Liberal Party, the second- day. All three major hospitals in east day of the worst fighting to hit Beirut largest Christian militia group, today Beirut were damaged by Syrian since the 1975-76 civil war. estimated Christian casualties since shelling of the Christian area. The crack of small arms fire and Sunday at over 100 dead and 300 Relations between'the Christians the thud of exploding artillery shells wounded. and Syrians had been souring as echoed across the capital today, The French-language daily Syria renewed close ties with the despite a cease-fire agreement L’Orient-Le Jour estimated that Palestinians in recent months. -
CAPP 52-21 April 2011
AEROSPACE LEADERSHIP FITNESS CHARACTER CIVIL AIR PATROL CADETS AT SCHOOL Program Overview for Educators CAPP 52-21 April 2011 Civil Air Patrol provides middle and high schools with CIVIL AIR PATROL a character education curriculum through its Cadet is a non-profit corporation that Program. was chartered by the U.S. Congress in 1946 and is the This guide is intended for professional educators who all-volunteer auxiliary of the are interested in making the Cadet Program part of U.S. Air Force. Its 61,000 their school community. It outlines the program’s goals members support its aerospace and benefits, describes the curriculum, and explains education, cadet program, and how the program is managed. emergency services missions. p NICOLE MALACHOWSKI p ERIC BOE Former Air Force Thunderbird Pilot Astronaut “My experiences as a CAP cadet were “I made my first solo flight at a CAP fundamental to my success.” encampment.” Change 1, June 2014: Updated contact information on page 9. INTRODUCTION Through partnerships with middle and high schools, Civil Air Patrol’s Cadet Program is fulfilling its mission of develop- ing tomorrow’s aerospace leaders. CAP offers schools an exciting form of character education that uses the students’ enthusiasm for aviation, space, and technology as a motivator. An Air Force-affiliated program, high schools find Civil Air Patrol a low-cost alternative to Junior ROTC. Middle schools p Serving in a find that the challenge of cadet life provides the structure early adolescents need. A color guard middle school CAP squadron can be a great complement to a high school JROTC program. -
Fm 6-02 Signal Support to Operations
FM 6-02 SIGNAL SUPPORT TO OPERATIONS SEPTEMBER 2019 DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This publication supersedes FM 6-02, dated 22 January 2014. HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY This publication is available at the Army Publishing Directorate site (https://armypubs.army.mil/) and the Central Army Registry site (https://atiam.train.army.mil/catalog/dashboard). *FM 6-02 Field Manual Headquarters No. 6-02 Department of the Army Washington, D.C., 13 September 2019 Signal Support to Operations Contents Page PREFACE..................................................................................................................... v INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ vii Chapter 1 OVERVIEW OF SIGNAL SUPPORT ........................................................................ 1-1 Section I – The Operational Environment ............................................................. 1-1 Challenges for Army Signal Support ......................................................................... 1-1 Operational Environment Overview ........................................................................... 1-1 Information Environment ........................................................................................... 1-2 Trends ........................................................................................................................ 1-3 Threat Effects on Signal Support ............................................................................. -
68 Stat.] Public Law 379-May 29, 1954 157
68 STAT.] PUBLIC LAW 379-MAY 29, 1954 157 been settled by the Secretary of the Navy, the Secretary of the Treas ury be, and he is hereby, authorized to pay, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, in full settlement of all such claims, the respective sums found to be due in the reports of the Secre tary of the Navy to Congress dated November 26,1951, and November 12, 1952, submitted pursuant to Public Law 637, Eightieth Congress (62 Stat. 389) : Provided^ That no part of the amount appropriated in this Act in excess of 10 per centum thereof shall be paid or delivered to or received by any agent or attorney on account of services rendered in connection with this claim, and the same shall be unlawful, any contract to the contrary notwithstanding. Any person violating the provisions of this Act shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in any sum not exceeding $1,000. Approved May 28, 1954. Public Law 379 CHAPTER 249 ^^ ^^^ May 29, 1954 To revise certain laws relating to warrant officers of the Army, Navy, Air Force, [H. R. 6374] Marine Corps, and Coast Guard, and for other purposes. Be it enacted hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the Warrant Off icer United States of America in Congress assembled^ That this Act may be Act of 1954. cited as the "Warrant Officer Act of 1954". DEFINITIONS SEC. 2. For the purposes of this Act— (a) The term "Secretary", unless otherwise qualified, means the Secretary of the Army, with respect to the Army; the Secretary of the Navy, with respect to the Navy and Marine Corps, and the Coast Guard when it is operating as a service in the Navy; the Secretary of the Air Force, with respect to the Air Force; and the Secretary of the Treasury, with respect to the Coast Guard when it is operating as a service in the Treasury Department. -
Commissioned Officer and Warrant Officer Career Management Program
Kansas Army National Guard Standard Operating Procedure 600-100-1 Personnel – Officer and Warrant Officer Commissioned Officer and Warrant Officer Career Management Program Adjutant General’s Department Headquarters, Kansas Army National Guard Topeka, Kansas 15 April 2021 UNCLASSIFIED SUMMARY OF CHANGE KSARNG 600-100-1 SOP 2021 Officer and Warrant Officer Career Management Program This revision, dated 15 April 2021 o Updates References to Publications and Forms (Throughout) o Added Enterprise Marketing & Behavioral Economics FA (58) to Operations Support Division (CH 2- 1.b.(1)) o Removed Electronic Warfare FA (29) from Information Dominance Division (FA 29 was rescinded effective October 2018) (CH 2-1.d) o Added SSC MSO information (CH 2-2.b.5) o Clarifies requirement for Commander KSARNG Medical Detachment, KSARNG Senior TJAG, and KSARNG Senior Chaplain to brief specialty branch officer assignments in conjunction with the LDAP (CH 2-3.c) o Specifies requirement to submit Officer Personnel Action Requests using the IPPS-A Customer Relations Management Ticket System with IPPS-A (CH 2-4) o Clarifies the authority of The Adjutant General and the LDAP to re-branch an officer without their consent (CH 3-2) o Adds responsibility for OPM to prepare annual accession and branching mission (CH 3-3.k.2a-b) o Adds details and branch detailing to branch assignment process (CH 3-3.1.2.b-c) o Modifies battalion command assignment consideration timeline (CH 3-6.i.(1)(a)(ii)) o Changes timeline for officer assignment projections by MSCs (CH 3-6.j) o -
New Cadet Handbook
NEW CADET HANDBOOK WELCOME ABOARD 1 Welcome Aboard!!!! You are joining one of the finest youth organizations in the Nation, The United States Naval Sea Cadet Corps (NSCC). The NSCC or just Sea Cadets is actually two programs The Naval Sea Cadet Corps (NSCC) is for American youth ages 13-17 that have a desire to learn about the Navy, Marine Corps, Coast Guard and Merchant Marine. Sea Cadets are authorized by the Secretary of the Navy to wear Navy uniforms appropriately marked with the Sea Cadet Corps insignia. The objectives of the Sea Cadet program are to introduce youth to naval life, to develop in them a sense of pride, patriotism, courage, and self- reliance, and to maintain an environment free of drugs and gangs. The Navy League Cadet Corps (NLCC) is for boys and girls, at least 10 but not yet 14 years old, who are interested in the sea and ships, and our nation’s seagoing services. The Navy League program is designed to introduce young people to maritime and military life, and to prepare them for later entrance into the Naval Sea Cadet Corps. This Handbook will help guide you into the unit. Again WELCOME ABOARD!!!! 2 Your Unit Your unit of the Sea Cadets is called the AMERICAN VETERANS DIVISION. Sea Cadet units are divided into three types: • DIVISIONS – NSCC Divisions train primarily in the field of seamanship. • SQUADRONS – NSCC Squadrons train primarily in the field of Aviation. • BATTALIONS – NSCC Battalions train primarily in the field of Naval Construction. While a unit may train primarily in one field of the Navy, its cadets do receive cross training in other fields. -
U.S.-South Korea Relations
U.S.-South Korea Relations Mark E. Manyin, Coordinator Specialist in Asian Affairs Emma Chanlett-Avery Specialist in Asian Affairs Mary Beth D. Nikitin Specialist in Nonproliferation Brock R. Williams Analyst in International Trade and Finance Jonathan R. Corrado Research Associate May 23, 2017 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R41481 U.S.-South Korea Relations Summary Overview South Korea (officially the Republic of Korea, or ROK) is one of the United States’ most important strategic and economic partners in Asia. Congressional interest in South Korea is driven by both security and trade interests. Since the early 1950s, the U.S.-ROK Mutual Defense Treaty commits the United States to help South Korea defend itself. Approximately 28,500 U.S. troops are based in the ROK, which is included under the U.S. “nuclear umbrella.” Washington and Seoul cooperate in addressing the challenges posed by North Korea. The two countries’ economies are joined by the Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA). South Korea is the United States’ seventh-largest trading partner and the United States is South Korea’s second- largest trading partner. Between 2009 and the end of 2016, relations between the two countries arguably reached their most robust state in decades. Political changes in both countries in 2017, however, have generated uncertainty about the state of the relationship. Coordination of North Korea Policy Dealing with North Korea is the dominant strategic concern of the relationship. The Trump Administration appears to have raised North Korea’s nuclear and missile programs to a top U.S. -
Staff Sergeant Ricky Hart Assistant Marine Officer Instructor NROTC Unit, the Citadel
Staff Sergeant Ricky Hart Assistant Marine Officer Instructor NROTC Unit, The Citadel Staff Sergeant Hart was born in Beaufort, South Carolina on 9 September, 1987. He enlisted in the Marine Corps in 2005 and attended recruit training with Fox Company, 2nd Recruit Training Battalion, Marine Corps Recruit Depot Parris Island, where he graduated as a meritorious Private First Class. Upon completion of recruit training in February of 2006, Staff Sergeant Hart reported to Marine Combat Training Battalion, Golf Company, and graduated in March of 2006. Staff Sergeant Hart was transferred to NAS Pensacola, where he attended Aviation Warfare Apprentice Training and Avionics Technician Intermediate Level Course, Class A1. While stationed at NAS Pensacola Staff Sergeant Hart was promoted to the rank of Lance Corporal and graduated his MOS at the top of his class. In October 2006, he was sent to his follow on MOS school aboard Keesler Air Force Base, Biloxi Mississippi. It was here Staff Sergeant Hart would learn his primary MOS of Precision Measurement Equipment (PME) Technician by completing General Purpose Electronic Test Equipment Repair and Calibration where he graduated at the top of his class. He also completed Intermediate Level Calibration of Physical/Dimensional and Measuring Systems school. In March of 2007, Staff Sergeant Hart received orders to his first duty station aboard MCAS New River, NC where he served as a Precision Measurement Equipment Technician within the MALS-29 Calibration Laboratory. In 2009 he was meritoriously promoted to the rank of Corporal and continued to serve with MALS-29. In August 2010, Staff Sergeant Hart re-enlisted in the Marine Corps and was transferred to MCAS Cherry Point, NC where he was assigned to MALS-14 and served as the Issue and Receive NCOIC for the Calibration Laboratory. -
Title 21 Food and Drugs Part 500 to 599
Title 21 Food and Drugs Part 500 to 599 Revised as of April 1, 2014 Containing a codification of documents of general applicability and future effect As of April 1, 2014 Published by the Office of the Federal Register National Archives and Records Administration as a Special Edition of the Federal Register VerDate Mar<15>2010 09:09 Aug 04, 2014 Jkt 232075 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 8091 Sfmt 8091 Y:\SGML\232075.XXX 232075 wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with CFR U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL EDITION NOTICE Legal Status and Use of Seals and Logos The seal of the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) authenticates the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) as the official codification of Federal regulations established under the Federal Register Act. Under the provisions of 44 U.S.C. 1507, the contents of the CFR, a special edition of the Federal Register, shall be judicially noticed. The CFR is prima facie evidence of the origi- nal documents published in the Federal Register (44 U.S.C. 1510). It is prohibited to use NARA’s official seal and the stylized Code of Federal Regulations logo on any republication of this material without the express, written permission of the Archivist of the United States or the Archivist’s designee. Any person using NARA’s official seals and logos in a manner inconsistent with the provisions of 36 CFR part 1200 is subject to the penalties specified in 18 U.S.C. 506, 701, and 1017. Use of ISBN Prefix This is the Official U.S. Government edition of this publication and is herein identified to certify its authenticity. -
Broadcasting Mmar26 Match
The NAB Convention: Caught up in the currents of change BroadcastingThe newsweekly of broadcasting and allied arts mMar26Our 48th Year 1979 The Peifect Match. KSTP -TV Minneapolis /St. Paul pñ 0.) Oc Op p X -4/3 ó On Monday, March 5, KSTP -TV became an ABC mz rH Television Network affiliate. More than 45 of the most popular m m° ca network shows have now joined the nation's leading p N news station. m vl co A division of Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. For more information, call KSTP -TVs Jim Blake, General Sales Manager, at 612/645 -2724. or your nearest Petry office. 1-1 C Source: Prbitron Nov. 78 bp 50 ADIs. Audience ratings are estimates only and subject to the D A limitations of said report. ASCAP, FROM LEGENDS TO SUPERSTARS Since ASCAP was founded in 1914, over those changes are all reflected in the di- 22,000 songwriters and composers have versity and depth of ASCAP's repertory. joined. From Standards, to Rock, to Country, to The list reads like a Who's Who of the Jazz, to MOR, to Disco, to R &B, to Soul, songwriting business. (It's only a lack of to Gospel, to Symphonic, ASCAP has pro- space that limits us to mentioning but a vided the outstanding songwriting talent tiny portion of ASCAP's membership.) of each era not only to the broadcasters In the past 65 years music has gone of America but to the people who tune in. through some very radical changes, but At ASCAP, we've always had the greats.