Staff Sergeant Ricky Hart Assistant Marine Officer Instructor NROTC Unit, the Citadel
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Big Changes to Recruit Training by Dayton Ward
The U.S. Army is updating its basic training curriculum with an eye toward instilling improved discipline, better physical fitness, and an enhanced appreciation for Army values and the ethics of the professional Soldier. (Graphic by NCO Journal) Back to Basics Big Changes to Recruit Training By Dayton Ward asic Combat Training or the "Ten-Week Journey ia, the Army takes an assessment of its basic training from Civilian to Soldier"1 is the foundation upon curriculum every three years per U.S. Army Training and which the Army builds professional, principled Doctrine Command policies. Bwarriors. More than 100,000 men and women undertake "With these normal assessments and discussions this training each year.2 with key leaders, we are getting after the 'Soldierization' As our nation faces evolving and more complex process," Mitchell said.3 challenges, it is vital to turn a critical eye toward the pro- Beginning in 2015, the Army surveyed more than cesses affecting this most fundamental aspect of military 27,000 Soldiers across the officer and noncommissioned training. Recognizing this need, the Army is in the midst officer ranks, asking them to identify the most common of evaluating and improving how it creates Soldiers and deficiencies in recent BCT and Advanced Individual ensuring recruits who graduate basic training are ready Training graduates. Topping the list was a lack of disci- to tackle the responsibilities the Army will soon place pline among new Soldiers, such as arriving late for duty upon them. assignments or failing to wear uniforms correctly. Also highlighted was a failure to show respect to senior-rank- Assessing the Situation ing Soldiers and failure to follow orders.4 According to Command Sgt. -
Audit of the Impact of Coronavirus Disease–2019 on Basic Training
Report No. DODIG-2021-069 CUI U.S. Department of Defense InspectorMARCH 31, 2021 General Audit of the Impact of Coronavirus Disease–2019 on Basic Training Controlled by: DoD OIG Controlled by: Readiness and Global Operations CUI Category: Operational Security Information Distribution/Dissemination Control: FED ONLY POC: INTEGRITY INDEPENDENCE EXCELLENCE CUI CUI CUI WORKING DRAFT CUI Audit of the Impact of Coronavirus Disease–2019 Resultson Basic Training in Brief March 31, 2021 Background (cont’d) Objective training center and all of the basic training centers for the Marine Corps, Navy, and Air Force. The six basic training The objective of this audit was to determine centers selected for review were: whether the DoD established and the Military • U.S. Army Training Center and Fort Jackson, Services implemented procedures to prevent South Carolina; and reduce the spread of coronavirus disease–2019 (COVID-19) at their basic • Marine Corps Recruit Depots, Parris Island, Backgroundtraining centers. South Carolina, and San Diego, California; • Navy Recruit Training Command, Great Lakes, Illinois; and COVID-19 is an infectious disease that • Air Force Basic Training Center Joint Base can cause a wide spectrum of symptoms. San Antonio–Lackland, Texas and Keesler On March 11, 2020, the World Health Air Force Base, Mississippi. Organization declared the COVID-19 outbreak Finding a pandemic, and on March 13, 2020, the President declared the COVID-19 pandemic a Despite the challenges with the global pandemic, the DoD national emergency. COVID-19 can transmit and Military Services established procedures to prevent and from person to person within 6 feet when reduce the spread of COVID-19. -
Lance Corporal Peter Conacher Died
Name: Peter Conacher Position: Lance Corporal DOB-DOD: 1919- 9 September 1943 Peter Conacher, Lance Corporal for the Royal Signals 231st Brigade, British Army, died during the period of Allied invasion of the Italian mainland. The Allied invasion of Sicily was to be the first of three amphibious assault landings conducted by the 231st Brigade during the war. The brigade was constituted as an independent brigade group under the command of Brigadier Roy Urquhart (later famous as commander of the 1st Airborne Division which was destroyed at Arnhem in September 1944). After some hard fighting, including the 2nd Devons at Regalbuto amongst the foothills of Mount Etna, the Germans were driven from Sicily and the Allies prepared to invade Italy. The 231st Brigade's second assault landing was at Porto San Venere on 7 September 1943, when the Allies invaded Italy. They were now experienced amphibious assault troops, however during this period Lance Corporal Peter Conacher died. After the September assault, the 231st Brigade became an integral part of the veteran 50th (Northumbrian) Infantry Division and was recalled to England with the division, to prepare for the Allied invasion of Normandy, scheduled for the spring of 1944. In February 1944 Brigadier Sir A.B.G. Stanier assumed command of the brigade. Peter was remembered by his parents Hugh and Marion Conacher of Dundee. He is buried in Salerno War Cemetery and his name is also recorded on a memorial situated in Dundee Telephone Hse having joined PO Engineering in March 1942. His parents provided a very touching and deeply moving inscription in memory of their son “THOUGH ABSENT HE IS EVER NEAR STILL MISSED, STILL LOVED EVER DEAR”. -
Fm 6-02 Signal Support to Operations
FM 6-02 SIGNAL SUPPORT TO OPERATIONS SEPTEMBER 2019 DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This publication supersedes FM 6-02, dated 22 January 2014. HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY This publication is available at the Army Publishing Directorate site (https://armypubs.army.mil/) and the Central Army Registry site (https://atiam.train.army.mil/catalog/dashboard). *FM 6-02 Field Manual Headquarters No. 6-02 Department of the Army Washington, D.C., 13 September 2019 Signal Support to Operations Contents Page PREFACE..................................................................................................................... v INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ vii Chapter 1 OVERVIEW OF SIGNAL SUPPORT ........................................................................ 1-1 Section I – The Operational Environment ............................................................. 1-1 Challenges for Army Signal Support ......................................................................... 1-1 Operational Environment Overview ........................................................................... 1-1 Information Environment ........................................................................................... 1-2 Trends ........................................................................................................................ 1-3 Threat Effects on Signal Support ............................................................................. -
United States Naval Sea Cadet Corps Recruit Training Command New England
UNITED STATES NAVAL SEA CADET CORPS R ECRUIT TRAINING COMMAND NEW ENGLAND 01 July 2019 – 13 July 2019 · Fort Devens, Massachusetts www.newenglandseacadets.org/training/rtc LCDR Christopher Donahue, NSCC · Commanding Officer of the Training Contingent PARENT INFORMATION GUIDE VERSION 1.0 (UPDATED 10MAR19) This guide contains essential information about getting your cadet signed up and prepared for training – please read the whole guide. You and your cadet will have a much better training experience if you both know what to expect!! Sec. Topic Page §1. When is Recruit Training? ............................................................................................ 2 §2. Where is Recruit Training? How do I get on the base? ............................................... 2 §3. What are the qualifications for Recruit Training? ........................................................ 2 §4. What do I have to do to get my Recruit a billet at Recruit Training? .......................... 3 §5. What happens on Check-In Day? ................................................................................. 3 §6. Check-In: Physical Fitness Test ................................................................................... 4 §7. Why is the PFT part of Check-In? ................................................................................ 4 §8. What if my Recruit gets injured before Recruit Training starts? .................................. 4 §9. What if my Recruit has a disability? ............................................................................ -
Enlisted Paths of Progression Chart
Updated 2/24/17 Enlisted Paths of Progression Enlisted Army Marine Corps Navy Coast Guard Air Force Level Rank Occupation Rank Rank Rank Rank Skill Level E-1 Private (PV1) Skill level 10 Private (PVT) Seaman Recruit (SR) Seaman Recruit Airman Basic (AB) Seaman Recruit (SR) (SR) Fireman Recruit (FR) Airman Recruit (AR) Construction Recruit (CR) Hospital Recruit (HR) E-2 Private (PV2) Skill level 10 Private First Class Seaman Apprentice (SA) Seaman Apprentice Airman (Amn) (PFC) Seaman Apprentice (SA) (SA) Hospital Apprentice (HA) Fireman Apprentice (FA) Airman Apprentice (AA) Construction Apprentice (CA) E-3 Private First Class Skill level 10 Lance Corporal (LCpl) Seaman (SN) Seaman (SN) Airman First Class (PFC) Seaman (SN) (A1C) Hospitalman (HN) Fireman (FN) Airman (AN) Constructionman (CN) E-4 Corporal (CPL) Skill level 10 Corporal (Cpl) Petty Officer Third Class Petty Officer Third Senior Airman or (PO3) Class (PO3) (SRA) Specialist (SPC) E-5 Sergeant (SGT) Skill level 20 Sergeant (Sgt) Petty Office Second Class Petty Office Second Staff Sergeant (PO2) Class (PO2) (SSgt) E-6 Staff Sergeant Skill level 30 Staff Sergeant (SSgt) Petty Officer First Class (PO1) Petty Officer First Technical Sergeant (SSG) Class (PO1) (TSgt) E-7 Sergeant First Class Skill level 40 Gunnery Sergeant Chief Petty Officer (CPO) Chief Petty Officer Master Sergeant (SFC) (GySgt) (CPO) (MSgt) E-8 Master Sergeant Skill level 50 Master Sergeant Senior Chief Petty Officer Senior Chief Petty Senior Master (MSG) (MSgt) (SCPO) Officer (SCPO) Sergeant (SMSgt) or or First Sergeant (1SG) First Sergeant (1stSgt) E-9 Sergeant Major Skill level 50 Master Gunnery Master Chief Petty Officer Master Chief Petty Chief Master (SGM) Sergeant (MGySgt) (MCPO) Officer (MCPO) Sergeant (CMSgt) or Skill level 60* or Command Sergeant (*For some fields, Sergeant Major Major (CSM) not all.) (SgtMaj) . -
Congressional Record—Senate S13314
S13314 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE December 16, 2009 Medicare, is going to be filled so that The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without CPT John L. Hallett III, 30, of Con- seniors will no longer have that period objection, it is so ordered. cord, CA, died August 25 in southern of uncertainty where their bills have f Afghanistan, of wounds suffered when reached a level where they are dis- enemy forces attacked his vehicle with HONORING OUR ARMED FORCES qualified from payment—the so-called an improvised explosive device. Cap- doughnut hole. It will be filled. It will Mrs. BOXER. Madam President, I tain Hallett was assigned to the 1st give them peace of mind that if they rise today to pay tribute to three Battalion, 17th Infantry Regiment, 5th have expensive pharmaceuticals, they young Americans who have been killed Stryker Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division, will have no interruption in coverage in Iraq since July 28. This brings to 882 Fort Lewis, WA. the number of servicemembers either in the future when it comes to those SPC Tyler R. Walshe, 21, of Shasta, from California or based in California pharmaceuticals. CA, died August 31 in southern Afghan- that have been killed while serving our For seniors, these are two major istan, of wounds suffered when enemy country in Iraq. This represents 20 per- things—to put Medicare on sound fi- forces attacked his unit with an impro- cent of all U.S. deaths in Iraq. nancial footing and to fill the dough- vised explosive device. Specialist nut hole under the Medicare prescrip- SPC Lukas C. -
An Analysis of Marine Corps Female Recruit Training Attrition
An Analysis of Marine Corps Female Recruit Training Attrition (b) (6) December 2014 (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (b) (6) (6) Distribution limited to sponsor only. This document contains the best opinion of CNA at the time of issue. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of the sponsor. Distribution Distribution limited to sponsor only. Specific authority: N00014-11-D-0323. Photography Credit: Recruits from (b) (6) negotiate the “Run-Jump-Swing” on the Marine Corps Confidence Course. Marine Corps Recruit Depot, Parris Island, SC, Oct. 3, 2012. (U. S. Marine Corps photo by L(b) (6) Released) Approved by: December 2014 (b) (6) Marine Corps Manpower Team Resource Analysis Division Copyright © 2014 CNA Abstract Over the past several years, the Department of Defense has asked the services to pursue expanded opportunities for women in the military. To support this effort, the Marine Corps started a deliberate and measured effort to examine the possible integration of women into ground combat units and military occupational specialties (MOSs) with the development of the Marine Corps Force Integration Plan (MCFIP). In turn, the Marine Corps asked CNA to examine female recruit training attrition. We examined the relationship between female recruit training attrition and four general groups of factors: (1) recruit characteristics, (2) recruiter and recruiter/recruit interaction characteristics, (3) recruiting substation leadership and management metrics, and (4) shipping timing factors. Although recruit characteristics and shipping timing factors continue to be the best predictors of female recruit training success, we found some interesting relationships between attrition and (1) recruiter and recruiter/recruit interaction characteristics and (2) recruiting substation leadership/management metrics. -
Training Officers Manual
TRAINING OFFICERS MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 TRAINING Page 1-1 General Page 1-1 Purpose Page 1-1 Mission Page 1-1 Objectives Page 1-1 Categories of Young Marines Training Page 1-1 National Training Programs Page 1-1 Adventures Page 1-1 Challenges Page 1-1 Encampments Page 1-2 Schools Page 1-2 Special Programs Page 1-2 Application Process Page 1-2 Unit Training Page 1-2 Unit Training Meetings Page 1-2 Monthly Training Schedule Page 1-2 Planning Process Page 1-3 Recruit Training Page 1-3 Physical Training Page 1-5 Ages 8 Page 1-5 Ages 9-11 Page 1-5 Ages 12-18 Page 1-5 Trips and Outings Page 1-6 General Training Safety Page 1-6 CHAPTER 2 PROMOTION REQUIREMENTS Page 2-1 Purpose Page 2-1 Restrictive and Non-restrictive Promotions Page 2-1 Mandatory Requirements Page 2-1 Oral Promotion Board Page 2-1 Physical Fitness Page 2-2 Recommendations for Promotions Page 2-2 Meritorious Promotions Page 2-3 Grandfather Clause Page 2-3 Table of Promotions Page 2-4 Leadership School Requirements Page 2-6 Advanced Young Marine Initiatives Page 2-6 National Promotion Exams Page 2-6 CHAPTER 3 YOUNG MARINE RECRUIT TRAINING SOP Page 3-1 Situation Page 3-1 Mission Page 3-1 Execution Page 3-1 National Executive Director’s Training Philosophy Page 3-1 National Executive Director’s Intent Page 3-1 Concept of Operations Page 3-1 Tasks Page 3-2 Coordinating Instructions Page 3-2 Training Execution Page 3-3 Training Day Page 3-3 Basic Daily Routine Page 3-3 Sleep Page 3-3 Young Marine Recruit Rights Page 3-3 Administration and Logistics Page 3-4 Personnel Qualifications -
Comparable Grades * April 2020
DoD2B 7000.14-R Financial Management Regulation Volume 7A, Comparable Grades * April 2020 VOLUME 7A, “COMPARABLE GRADES” SUMMARY OF MAJOR CHANGES All changes are denoted by blue font. Substantive revisions are denoted by an asterisk (*) symbol preceding the section, paragraph, table, or figure that includes the revision. Unless otherwise noted, chapters referenced are contained in this volume. Hyperlinks are denoted by bold, italic, blue, and underlined font. The previous version dated April 2018 is archived. PARAGRAPH EXPLANATION OF CHANGE/REVISION PURPOSE Added the Coast Guard and a note to the “Comparable All Addition Grades.” Added a note acknowledging the establishment of U.S. Space Force as the sixth branch of the armed forces and All Addition explaining the chapter will be updated as soon as the U.S. Space Force information is available. CG-1 DoD2B 7000.14-R Financial Management Regulation Volume 7A, Comparable Grades * April 2020 Comparable Grades Pay Grade Army Navy/Coast Guard Marine Corps Air Force O-10 General Admiral General General O-9 Lieutenant General Vice Admiral Lieutenant General Lieutenant General O-8 Major General Rear Admiral (UH) Major General Major General O-7 Brigadier General Rear Admiral (LH) Brigadier General Brigadier General O-6 Colonel Captain Colonel Colonel O-5 Lieutenant Colonel Commander Lieutenant Colonel Lieutenant Colonel O-4 Major Lieutenant Major Major Commander O-3 Captain Lieutenant Captain Captain O-2 1st Lieutenant Lieutenant (JG) 1st Lieutenant 1st Lieutenant O-1 2nd Lieutenant Ensign 2nd Lieutenant -
US Military Ranks and Units
US Military Ranks and Units Modern US Military Ranks The table shows current ranks in the US military service branches, but they can serve as a fair guide throughout the twentieth century. Ranks in foreign military services may vary significantly, even when the same names are used. Many European countries use the rank Field Marshal, for example, which is not used in the United States. Pay Army Air Force Marines Navy and Coast Guard Scale Commissioned Officers General of the ** General of the Air Force Fleet Admiral Army Chief of Naval Operations Army Chief of Commandant of the Air Force Chief of Staff Staff Marine Corps O-10 Commandant of the Coast General Guard General General Admiral O-9 Lieutenant General Lieutenant General Lieutenant General Vice Admiral Rear Admiral O-8 Major General Major General Major General (Upper Half) Rear Admiral O-7 Brigadier General Brigadier General Brigadier General (Commodore) O-6 Colonel Colonel Colonel Captain O-5 Lieutenant Colonel Lieutenant Colonel Lieutenant Colonel Commander O-4 Major Major Major Lieutenant Commander O-3 Captain Captain Captain Lieutenant O-2 1st Lieutenant 1st Lieutenant 1st Lieutenant Lieutenant, Junior Grade O-1 2nd Lieutenant 2nd Lieutenant 2nd Lieutenant Ensign Warrant Officers Master Warrant W-5 Chief Warrant Officer 5 Master Warrant Officer Officer 5 W-4 Warrant Officer 4 Chief Warrant Officer 4 Warrant Officer 4 W-3 Warrant Officer 3 Chief Warrant Officer 3 Warrant Officer 3 W-2 Warrant Officer 2 Chief Warrant Officer 2 Warrant Officer 2 W-1 Warrant Officer 1 Warrant Officer Warrant Officer 1 Blank indicates there is no rank at that pay grade. -
Tobacco Use and the United States Military: a Longstanding Problem
Tobacco Control 1998;7:219–221 219 Tob Control: first published as 10.1136/tc.7.3.219 on 1 September 1998. Downloaded from Tobacco use and the United States military: a longstanding problem Ties between the United States military and the tobacco negative relationships between smoking and various meas- industry trace back to the early parts of the 20th century. ures of “performance readiness”. Smokers exercise less During the second world war, for example, cigarette adver- and perform more poorly on physical fitness tests,15–17 and tisements praising service members were widespread on they are less successful in combat training.18 19 Smokers popular radio programmes and in periodicals.1 Some ads also have higher rates of various types of illnesses and even featured cigarette-using doctors vouching for the absenteeism from the job.20 21 The eVects of regular great taste and mildness of particular brands. Cigarettes tobacco use clearly are incompatible with maintaining the were also included as part of the K-rations and C-rations physical abilities necessary to perform at peak levels in the provided to soldiers and sailors during the second world very physically demanding jobs that are commonplace in war, and these cigarettes frequently became more valuable the military. for trading or selling than the food items in the rations. Data presented by Haddock et al 22 in this issue of During times of war and peace, many young people Tobacco Control provide further evidence that smoking is (predominantly men, as they have traditionally comprised still a matter for concern even among air force personnel, the bulk of military personnel) started smoking after they who have lower smoking rates than all of the other services.