Congressional Record—House H5534

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Congressional Record—House H5534 H5534 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE July 12, 2017 H. RES. 439 Mr. Chairman, I am proud to bring But what we can guarantee is, if we Resolved, That the following named Mem- before the House H.R. 2810, the Na- don’t fund these things now, they will ber be and is hereby elected to the following tional Defense Authorization Act for not be available when we need them, so standing committee of the House of Rep- Fiscal Year 2018. It was reported favor- that is the priority given to this bill. resentatives: ably by the House Armed Services Mr. Chairman, exactly 1 month ago, (1) COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES.—Mr. Committee at 11:59 p.m. on June 28, on June 12, Secretary Mattis and Panetta. 2017, by a vote of 60–1. Now, that vote Chairman Dunford testified before our The resolution was agreed to. is an indication of the bipartisan sup- committee. And I would like to read A motion to reconsider was laid on port that exists to support our troops just one paragraph of the Secretary’s the table. and to fulfill our obligations placed on testimony where he was comparing f us by the Constitution. what the military was like when he left GENERAL LEAVE Mr. Chairman, I think it is always it and when he came back as Secretary. helpful for us to remind ourselves of Secretary Mattis testified: ‘‘Four Mr. THORNBERRY. Mr. Speaker, I the authority by which we undertake years later, I returned to the Depart- ask unanimous consent that all Mem- our responsibilities. Article I, Section 8 ment and I have been shocked by what bers have 5 legislative days in which to of the Constitution says that Congress I have seen with our readiness to fight. revise and extend their remarks and in- has the power and the responsibility For all the heartache caused by the sert extraneous material on H.R. 2810. ‘‘to raise and support Armies. To loss of our troops during these wars, no The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there provide and maintain a Navy; To make enemy in the field has done more harm objection to the request of the gen- Rules for the Government and Regula- to the readiness of our military than tleman from Texas? tion of land and naval Forces,’’ and, of sequestration. We have sustained our There was no objection. course, ‘‘To make all Laws which shall ability to meet America’s commit- f be necessary and proper for carrying ments abroad because our troops have stoically shouldered a much greater PERMISSION TO CONSIDER into Execution the foregoing Powers.’’ The members of our committee and burden.’’ AMENDMENT NO. 88 PRINTED IN our staff take those responsibilities Four years later, shocked, more PART B OF HOUSE REPORT 115– very seriously. This year, we seek to harm by sequestration than the en- 212 OUT OF SEQUENCE carry them out in a world which is as emies in the field, and it is only be- Mr. THORNBERRY. Mr. Speaker, I dangerous and complex as any of us cause our folks are so incredible that ask unanimous consent that during have ever seen. One example from the they have born an increasing burden. consideration of H.R. 2810, pursuant to news of the day is the alarming That is what the Secretary testified. House Resolution 431, amendment No. progress North Korea is making to- Mr. Chairman, we have, indisputably, 88 printed in part B of House Report wards having an intercontinental bal- the finest military in the world, but it 115–212 may be considered out of se- listic missile that can carry nuclear is also indisputable that it has been se- quence. weapons to our homeland. verely damaged by continuing resolu- The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there Now, we have, of course, a number of tions, by sequestration, and by failure objection to the request of the gen- tools to use, including diplomacy and of the executive and legislative tleman from Texas? sanctions, but there is no substitute for branches to adequately support the There was no objection. military power, and I believe we must men and women out there on the front f develop and deploy more of it to be lines. We have an urgent need to begin ready to deal with these growing to repair and rebuild our military. NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZA- threats. And I also believe, Mr. Chairman, it TION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018 So the bill before us today substan- is fundamentally wrong to send men The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursu- tially increases money for missile de- and women out on dangerous missions ant to House Resolution 431 and rule fense so we are more capable of pro- without providing them the best equip- XVIII, the Chair declares the House in tecting our homeland against those ment, in the best shape, with the best the Committee of the Whole House on ballistic missiles. It also increases training that our country can possibly the state of the Union for the consider- funding for key munitions and for in- provide. This bill, if followed by match- ation of the bill, H.R. 2810. telligence surveillance and reconnais- ing appropriation, takes a significant The Chair appoints the gentleman sance so we can have better visibility step toward meeting that objective, to from Michigan (Mr. MITCHELL) to pre- on what adversary is doing. support those troops. side over the Committee of the Whole. It increases the end strength for the It also makes major reforms in the Army, the Navy, and the Air Force, way the Pentagon does business. b 1920 just as they requested. And it funds Among other reforms, it enables the IN THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE more joint exercises with key allies in military to buy commercial products Accordingly, the House resolved the Pacific. It boosts our shipbuilding through online sites such as Amazon, itself into the Committee of the Whole budget to get more ships into the water Staples, and Grainger. We require life House on the state of the Union for the faster, and also cheaper. cycle maintenance costs to be consid- consideration of the bill (H.R. 2810) to So, just as an example, Mr. Chair- ered at the beginning of a program, as authorize appropriations for fiscal year man, each of those items is important must intellectual property rights, to 2018 for military activities of the De- for dealing with this growing threat maximize competition in the mainte- partment of Defense and for military coming from North Korea, and we nance and repairs. Oversight into serv- construction, to prescribe military per- could sit here and go through a similar ice contracts has increased, and there sonnel strengths for such fiscal year, sort of discussion when it comes to is much more, of course, in the bill. and for other purposes, with Mr. Iran, or the provocative actions of Rus- Mr. Chairman, this bill is the vehicle MITCHELL in the chair. sia and China, or the terrorist organi- by which we usually, for 55 years, at The Clerk read the title of the bill. zations of various shades. least, fulfill our responsibilities under The CHAIR. Pursuant to the rule, the Of course, we cannot guarantee that the Constitution that I mentioned, to bill is considered read the first time. the capabilities that we will vote on in provide for the common defense. I be- The gentleman from Texas (Mr. this bill will be available by the time lieve that is the first job of the Federal THORNBERRY) and the gentleman from the crisis comes for, unfortunately, Mr. Government. Washington (Mr. SMITH) each will con- Chairman, we are still dealing with de- I want to just express my apprecia- trol 30 minutes. fense budgets that were cut by more tion to each of the members of our The Chair recognizes the gentleman than 20 percent at a time when the committee. Each of them has contrib- from Texas. threats around the world were growing. uted to the product before us. Each of Mr. THORNBERRY. Mr. Chairman, I So we can’t guarantee that these capa- them takes their responsibilities under yield myself such time as I may con- bilities will be available when we need the Constitution very seriously; no one sume. them. more so than the Ranking Member, Mr. VerDate Sep 11 2014 17:30 Jul 13, 2017 Jkt 069060 PO 00000 Frm 00098 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A12JY7.053 H12JYPT1 rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with HOUSE July 12, 2017 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE H5535 SMITH of Washington. We don’t always Again, I do want to compliment the bust the budget caps. Here we have a agree on the judgment calls about work that has been done on this bill. bill that does that, but this House has issues, but I have no doubt that he and Particularly, I focus a lot on unconven- to step up and take that vote if this de- all the members of the committee try tional threats. I think that is the fense authorizing bill is going to go for- to do what is right for the country and changing nature of the world. I used to ward. put the interests of our troops first. chair what is now called the Emerging The second and final point, we still That is exactly the attitude that we Threats Committee. I want to thank don’t have a national security strategy must follow, I think, on the floor over Congresswoman STEFANIK and Ranking from the White House. Now, we have a the next 3 days as we go through the Member LANGEVIN for their work and very complex threat environment, as I amendments which we will consider.
Recommended publications
  • FRATERNITIES Carstens
    m _ edseodestt whe sepas the letter @t Maysee flaith Bad pinsw0 *ie aft Us enm tsee UP&U bwad wima-&imips1 ed t 000ta by er ber at whnne *ate fad both,"1110r110119"M mudt without. do usht net bb h h la W Wesatm112,0am has e the "am ofterams esm- * 'Dd him come W she said, and then been Ons in 4 bte" a fee-Illmmme a 4bvn--ai Mgea Sone of the maids of he the at thimrtu ofs0 ase a t be 1T. "evhgo de isn- temporary bath led a m dU- wh See waS esat to each m 1er et the esb- went to gli the mesenger Into the lsser who ghter-h&* 'a wwa hs' blood. wof I usaw m of the two tents of festval she added. bath made o she is ToU-q0-- a , bm his- **m7~TheIlulmef aemin cemnib- "And where Is-the'ma r you." Ie a towar the MareemA, BathM 944Wo baentehodAM LaVIARSIXh et PyM,aw atdtismA ~mmn-y. Adigagoswh.gnot tuigase with a, It was Yvette who answered ber. who stood u whSS anTraR TheI to a 100110 s-m 4101 yeaw ag& Some n"4aa 'Do not hear?' she erled, clapping at-the anddea fduf&panm. Vri mosame be itramarred M' aamhabemPto 8m-I he of a you wRi the harbt t t" eamtr Maes, No. of ts and Is her hands with pleasurw "His people are boy, slay YoeIldn 2, Hity, wt He bringing him up In triumph. Do you hear And at the wonhe preciptated Mise rec"neftd as me at the most sette aGd leg.
    [Show full text]
  • The Parsonage Street 21 Cold Spring Asks Court to Dismiss Butterfield Suit
    [FREE] Serving Philipstown and Beacon Women to the Rescue Page 11 MAY 26, 2017 161 MAIN ST., COLD SPRING, N.Y. | highlandscurrent.com The Parsonage Street 21 An entire neighborhood of young men went to war. One did not return By Michael Turton fter the U.S. entered World War II in 1941, the two blocks of Parson- Aage Street in Cold Spring seemed to empty. Twenty-one young men who lived on the street left to fight. Miraculously, in a war in which 405,399 American soldiers lost their lives, only one of the 21 did not return. Anthony “Guy” Nastasi served in the 143rd Regiment of the Army’s 36th Infan- try “Arrowhead” Division. He fought in several major battles, beginning with the landing at Anzio, Italy, before heading to Guy Nastasi and the telegram notifying France, according to Thomas Nastasi of his mother that he had been killed in Cold Spring, who has done a great deal of action Photo courtesy of Thomas Nastasi research on the Parsonage Street 21 for a book he is writing about his uncle. bers received the Medal of Honor. Father Shane Scott-Hamblen of St. Mary's-in-the-Highlands, Jack Dickerhof and Chip On Sept. 22, 1944, Guy Nastasi’s platoon Two months before his death, Nastasi Kniffen place wooden crosses on the lawn of the church in preparation for Memorial was ordered to secure a hill near the vil- had an unlikely encounter. While march- Day. The work, which began May 22, is completed over several days. One of the lage of Saint-Alvold on the Moselle River, ing near Anzio, someone called, “Guy! crosses commemorates Guy Nastasi.
    [Show full text]
  • GREGORY the Natures of War FINAL May 2015
    !1 The Natures of War Derek Gregory for Neil 1 In his too short life, Neil Smith had much to say about both nature and war: from his seminal discussion of ‘the production of nature’ in his first book, Uneven development, to his dissections of war in the twentieth and early twenty-first centuries in American Empire – where he identified the ends of the First and Second World Wars as crucial punctuations in the modern genealogy of globalisation – and its coda, The endgame of globalization, a critique of America’s wars conducted in the shadows of 9/11. 2 And yet, surprisingly, he never linked the two. He was of course aware of their connections. He always insisted that the capitalist production of nature, like that of space, was never – could not be – a purely domestic matter, and he emphasised that the modern projects of colonialism and imperialism depended upon often spectacular displays of military violence. But he did not explore those relations in any systematic or substantive fashion. He was not alone. The great Marxist critic Raymond Williams once famously identified ‘nature’ as ‘perhaps the most complex word in the [English] language.’ Since he wrote, countless commentators have elaborated on its complexities, but few of them 1 This is a revised and extended version of the first Neil Smith Lecture, delivered at the University of St Andrews – Neil’s alma mater – on 14 November 2013. I am grateful to Catriona Gold for research assistance on the Western Desert, to Paige Patchin for lively discussions about porno-tropicality and the Vietnam war, and to Noel Castree, Dan Clayton, Deb Cowen, Isla Forsyth, Gastón Gordillo, Jaimie Gregory, Craig Jones, Stephen Legg and the editorial collective of Antipode for radically improving my early drafts.
    [Show full text]
  • The North Korean Nuclear Crisis: Past Failures, Present Solutions
    Saint Louis University Law Journal Volume 50 Number 2 A Tribute to the Honorable Michael A. Article 16 Wolff (Winter 2006) 2006 The North Korean Nuclear Crisis: Past Failures, Present Solutions Morse Tan The University of Texas at Austin School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.slu.edu/lj Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Morse Tan, The North Korean Nuclear Crisis: Past Failures, Present Solutions, 50 St. Louis U. L.J. (2006). Available at: https://scholarship.law.slu.edu/lj/vol50/iss2/16 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Saint Louis University Law Journal by an authorized editor of Scholarship Commons. For more information, please contact Susie Lee. SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW THE NORTH KOREAN NUCLEAR CRISIS: PAST FAILURES, PRESENT SOLUTIONS MORSE TAN* ABSTRACT North Korea has recently announced that it has developed nuclear weapons and has pulled out of the six-party talks. These events do not emerge out of a vacuum, and this Article lends perspective through an interdisciplinary lens that seeks to grapple with the complexities and provide constructive approaches based on this well-researched understanding. This Article analyzes political, military, historical, legal and other angles of this international crisis. Past dealings with North Korea have been unfruitful because other nations do not recognize the ties between North Korean acts and its ideology and objectives. For a satisfactory resolution to the current crisis, South Korea and the United States must maintain sufficient deterrence, focus on multi-lateral and international avenues, and increase the negative and later positive incentives for North Korean compliance with its international obligations.
    [Show full text]
  • FM 3-24.2. Tactics in Counterinsurgency
    FM 3-24.2 (FM 90-8, FM 7-98) TACTICS IN COUNTERINSURGENCY APRIL 2009 DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release, distribution is unlimited. HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY This publication is available at Army Knowledge Online (www.us.army.mil) and General Dennis J. Reimer Training and Doctrine Digital Library at (www.train.army.mil). * FM 3-24.2 (FM 90-8, FM 7-98) Field Manual Headquarters Department of the Army No. 3-24.2 Washington, DC, 21 April 2009 Tactics in Counterinsurgency Contents Page PREFACE ................................................................................................................. viii INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... ix Chapter 1 OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT OF COUNTERINSURGENCY ........................... 1-1 Section I—OVERVIEW ............................................................................................. 1-1 Insurgency........................................................................................................... 1-1 Counterinsurgency .............................................................................................. 1-2 Influences on Current Operational Environments ............................................... 1-2 Section II—OPERATIONAL AND MISSION VARIABLES ..................................... 1-3 Operational Variables ......................................................................................... 1-3 Mission Variables ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Airpower in Three Wars
    AIRPOWER IN THREE WARS GENERAL WILLIAM W. MOMYER USAF, RET. Reprint Edition EDITORS: MANAGING EDITOR - LT COL A. J. C. LAVALLE, MS TEXTUAL EDITOR - MAJOR JAMES C. GASTON, PHD ILLUSTRATED BY: LT COL A. J. C. LAVALLE Air University Press Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama April 2003 Air University Library Cataloging Data Momyer, William W. Airpower in three wars / William W. Momyer ; managing editor, A. J. C. Lavalle ; textual editor, James C. Gaston ; illustrated by A. J. C. Lavalle–– Reprinted. p. ; cm. With a new preface. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-58566-116-3 1. Airpower. 2. World War, 1939–1945––Aerial operations. 3. Korean War. 1950–1953––Aerial operations. 4. Vietnamese Conflict, 1961–1975––Aerial oper- ations. 5. Momyer, William W. 6. Aeronautics, Military––United States. I. Title. II. Lavalle, A. J. C. (Arthur J. C.), 1940– III. Gaston, James C. 358.4/009/04––dc21 Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public release. Air University Press 131 West Shumacher Avenue Maxwell AFB AL 36112-6615 http://aupress.maxwell.af.mil ii TO . all those brave airmen who fought their battles in the skies for command of the air in World War II, Korea, and Vietnam. iii THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK PREFACE 2003 When I received the request to update my 1978 foreword to this book, I thought it might be useful to give my perspective of some aspects on the employment of airpower in the Persian Gulf War, the Air War over Serbia (Operation Allied Force), and the war in Afghanistan (Operation Enduring Freedom).
    [Show full text]
  • Vietnam War US Army Video Log Michael Momparler Born
    Video Log Michael Momparler Vietnam War U.S. Army Born: 03/05/1947 Interviewed on 11/20/2012 Interviewed by: George Jones 00:00:00 Introduction 00:00:23 Michael Momparler’s highest rank was 1st Lieutenant. 00:00:35 Momparler served in III Corps in Vietnam 00:00:45 Momparler was living in College Point, NY when he enlisted in the Army on 4/18/1966. He joined because he was a wild teenager with legal problems and few other options 00:01:45 Momparler discusses first days in the U.S. Army and his thoughts about the experience and the military experiences of other family members; specifically a cousin who suffered the loss of six fellow Marines. 00:03:23 Momparler discusses basic training experiences like using monkey bars, the mile run, and KP. 00:04:40 Momparler discusses being selected for Officer Candidate School - OCS. Mentions the testing and that he was encouraged to tell the interviewing officer that the war in Vietnam should be escalated. Entered OCS at age 19. 00:05:50 Momparler transition from basic training to advanced infrantry training to OCS. 00:06:24 Momparler discusses experiences with the M-14, M-15, and M-16 rifles. 00:07:00 Momparler discusses the experience of Officer Candidate School. 00:10:32 Momparler mentions that one of his commanding officers was in the Bay of Pigs invasion. Discusses the amount of combat experience, or Vietnam experience of his commanding officers at OCS. 00:11:00 Momparler discusses how OCS candidates used the OCS experience to limit their amount of time in the Army or avoid having to serve in Vietnam.
    [Show full text]
  • Tet 1968 Draft 2
    THOMAS KJOS We have at least a hazy memory of our firefights - images, sounds, feelings. We remember walking, running, the heat, the rain. We remember “humping a load.” What we didn’t know at the time, and perhaps have not been able to learn since, is what those firefights were part of. The larger battles, the plans, the “why the hell were we in that place, at that time.” This is the story of Delta Company at Tet in 1968. It is also the story of the plans and battles that give greater context to our place in the history of the Vietnam war. Six North Vietnamese Army Battalions were moving into positions to launch the attack on Quang Tri City when the elite commandos of the NVA 10th Sapper Battalion struck key targets in the city at 0200 hours on January 31, 1968. The capture of Quang Tri would open an avenue of attack straight from the DMZ to the strategically important city of Hue. The Army of the Republic of Vietnam defending the city was widely expected to quickly collapse. Instead, the ARVN troops stayed, fought, and held the city until cavalry troopers rode to the rescue — this time to the thump of rotor blades. Capital of the province of the same name, Quang Tri was 12 miles south of the DMZ, situated on National Highway QL 1. A road network of north-south and east-west corridors passed through the city. Only 45 miles north of Hue, Quang Tri, on the coastal plain, was vulnerable to attack from all but the west, where the Thach Han river presented a formidable barrier.
    [Show full text]
  • DUE 43 Cover
    M4 SHERMAN TYPE 97 CHI-HA The Pacific 1945 STEVEN J. ZALOGA © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com M4 SHERMAN TYPE 97 CHI-HA The Pacific 1945 STEVEN J. ZALOGA © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com CONTENTS Introduction 4 Chronology 8 Design and Development 10 Technical Specifications 21 The Combatants 30 The Strategic Situation 41 Combat 47 Statistics and Analysis 74 Bibliography 78 Index 80 © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com INTRODUCTION Most titles in the Duel series deal with weapons of similar combat effectiveness. But what happens when the weapons of one side are dramatically inferior to those of the other? Could the technological imbalance be overcome by innovative tactics? This title examines such a contest, the US Army’s M4A3 Sherman medium tank against the Japanese Type 97-kai Shinhoto Chi-Ha in the Philippines in 1945. Tank combat in the Pacific War of 1941–45 is not widely discussed. There has long been a presumption that the terrain conditions in many areas, especially the mountainous tropical jungles of the Southwest Pacific and Burma, were not well suited to tank use. Yet the terrain of the Pacific battlefields varied enormously, from the fetid jungles of New Guinea to the rocky coral atolls of the Central Pacific. In many of the critical campaigns of 1944–45, the terrain was suitable for tank use and they became a critical ingredient in the outcome of the fighting. This book examines the largest single armored clash of the Pacific War – on Luzon in the Philippines in January–February 1945. This was the only time that the Imperial Japanese Army (IJA) committed an entire armored division against American or British forces.
    [Show full text]
  • Station Memorandum Lieut. A. J. “Tony” Feher, USN, Visits Son Who Is Cadet Here
    Vol. 2—No. 13 U. S. Navy Pre-Flight School, Chapel Hill, N. C. Saturday, December 11, 1943 Admiral Buckmaster And Captain Kiefer Station Memorandum Pearl Harbor Day War Bond Drive Goes Over The Top The $50,000 War Bond quota at this Activity was topped by more than $37,000, and is a splendid commentary on the zeal with which the Station accepted its obligation to help buy the munitions of war that will spell the defeat of our enemies. The Commanding Officer is proud of the response and congratulates the officers, crew, cadets, and civil service personnel alike. 88.4% of the personnel of the Station participated in the Pearl Harbor Day War Bond Drive, and the amount subscribed was equal to more than 47% of the monthly payroll of the entire Station and. represents $40.51 bond maturity value per person attached to this Command. JOHN P. GRAFF Commanding Officer Lieut. A. J. “Tony” Feher, USN, Visits Son Who Is Cadet Here Last Saturday Lieut. A. J. “Tony” Feher, USN, visited this station and called upon his son. Aviation Cadet Melvin A. Feher, and Com­ mander John P. Graff. t h e p r e v io u s t im e Rear Ad­ Lieut. Feher enlisted as a “Landsman” in the United States Navy miral Elliott Buckmaster, USN, in 1904 and is one of the oldest living naval aviators—not only in age, (left, above) and Capt. Dixie but in length of service. During his first cruise he was rated First Kiefer, USN, parted company, it Class Turret Captain, a remark-®" 'vas as the aircraft carrier “York- able achievement in those days.
    [Show full text]
  • Read PDF ^ the Indestructible Man: the True Story of World War II Hero
    CYUSSNS4MC0W ~ Doc The Indestructible Man: The True Story of World War II Hero Captain... Th e Indestructible Man: Th e True Story of W orld W ar II Hero Captain Dixie (Paperback) Filesize: 7.57 MB Reviews Good e book and useful one. It really is simplistic but shocks in the 50 % of your book. Your way of life period will probably be convert the instant you total reading this ebook. (Myah Williamson) DISCLAIMER | DMCA SXUPPJVS0AVK > Book « The Indestructible Man: The True Story of World War II Hero Captain... THE INDESTRUCTIBLE MAN: THE TRUE STORY OF WORLD WAR II HERO CAPTAIN DIXIE (PAPERBACK) Createspace Independent Publishing Platform, 2017. Paperback. Condition: New. Language: English . Brand New Book ***** Print on Demand *****. Dixie Kiefer was a true World War II hero. He was the first man to fly an airplane o a ship at night, Executive Oicer on the carrier USS Yorktown at the battles of the Coral Sea and Midway, and skipper of USS Ticonderoga when she came under brutal attack by Japanese kamikaze planes. Through it all, he performed coolly and heroically, leading his men through hell and back. But Captain Dixie was much more. He was a sailor s skipper. A man who would not ask his men to do anything he would not do. He referred to his crew as Dixie s kids. His regular cocktail club meetings aboard his ships were legendary. And he even had a key role in an Academy Award-winning movie. When his big aircra carrier was hit by suicide planes, he remained on the bridge overseeing defenses and damage control for twelve hours even though he had suered more than sixty serious shrapnel wounds and a badly broken right arm.
    [Show full text]
  • Navy Ford (CVN-78) Class Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress
    Navy Ford (CVN-78) Class Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress (name redacted) Specialist in Naval Affairs December 22, 2017 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov RS20643 Navy Ford (CVN-78) Class Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress Summary CVN-78, CVN-79, CVN-80, and CVN-81 are the first four ships in the Navy’s new Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78) class of nuclear-powered aircraft carriers (CVNs). CVN-78 was procured in FY2008. The Navy’s proposed FY2018 budget estimates the ship’s procurement cost at $12,907.0 million (i.e., about $12.9 billion) in then-year dollars. The ship received advance procurement funding in FY2001-FY2007 and was fully funded in FY2008- FY2011 using congressionally authorized four-year incremental funding. To help cover cost growth on the ship, the ship received an additional $1,374.9 million in FY2014-FY2016 cost-to- complete procurement funding. The Navy’s proposed FY2018 budget requests $20 million in additional cost-to-complete procurement funding. The ship was delivered to the Navy on May 31, 2017, and was commissioned into service on July 22, 2017. CVN-79 was procured in FY2013. The Navy’s proposed FY2018 budget estimates the ship’s procurement cost at $11,377.4 million (i.e., about $11.4 billion) in then-year dollars. The ship received advance procurement funding in FY2007-FY2012, and the Navy plans to fully fund the ship in FY2013-FY2018 using congressionally authorized six-year incremental funding. The Navy’s proposed FY2018 budget requests $2,561.1 million in procurement funding for the ship.
    [Show full text]