DOCSLIB.ORG
Recommended publications
  • 3 Cultural Policy and Cultural Diversity A
    Strasbourg,2 October 2002 DGIV/CULT/POL/trans(2002) 3 CULTURAL POLICY AND CULTURAL DIVERSITY A TRANSVERSAL STUDY YEAR TWO REPORT HUNGARY CULTURAL POLICY AND CULTURAL DIVERSITY A TRANSVERSAL STUDY Hungarian national report Prepared by: The Ministry of Cultural Heritage Budapest Dr. Zoltán József Tóth 2002 2 SUMMARY OVERVIEW 5 1. MAPPING CULTURAL DIVERSITY 7 1. INTRODUCTION 7 1.A. THE POSITION OF THE NATIONAL MINORITIES AND THE ETHNIC COMPOSITION OF THE POPULATION BEFORE 1945 7 1.B. THE POSITION OF THE NATIONAL MINORITIES IN HUNGARY BETWEEN 1945 AND 1990 8 2. THE LEGAL POSITION OF THE NATIONAL AND ETHNIC MINORITIES BETWEEN 1990 AND 2002. THE 1993 MINORITIES’ ACT. 9 3. DEMOGRAPHY 1941-2001 14 4. THE GOVERNMENT STRUCTURE INVOLVING MINORITY AFFAIRS 17 5. THE SYSTEM OF STATE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE 18 C. 21 6. THE SITUATION OF NATIONALITIES /ETHNIC GROUPS LISTED IN THE ACT ON MINORITIES 22 1. BULGARIANS OF HUNGARY 22 2. THE ROMA OF HUNGARY 22 3.) GREEKS IN HUNGARY 27 4.) CROATS OF HUNGARY 27 5. POLES IN HUNGARY 28 6.) GERMANS IN HUNGARY 29 7. ARMENIANS IN HUNGARY 30 8. ROMANIANS OF HUNGARY 30 9. RUTHENIANS OF HUNGARY 31 10. SERBS OF HUNGARY 32 11. SLOVAKS OF HUNGARY 32 12. SLOVENES OF HUNGARY 33 13. UKRAINIANS OF HUNGARY 34 7. ETHNIC GROUPS NOT REGARDED AS NATIONAL OR ETHNIC MINORITIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACT ON MINORITIES 34 II. MAPPING CULTURAL POLICY (CULTURAL POLICY, THE ARTS AND THE MEDIA) 35 1. POLICIES AND CULTURAL POLITICS FROM 1945 TO 1989 35 1. LITERATURE 35 2. THE ARTS OF HUNGARY BETWEEN 1945 AND 1989 37 3.
    [Show full text]
  • A Thesis Submitted to the Department
    A thesis submitted to the Department of Environmental Sciences and Policy of Central European University in part fulfilment of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy “We Don’t Eat Fish...” Science, Policy and EU Governance: The Implementation of Arsenic Limits for Drinking Water in a Hungarian Case Study Julia LEVENTON June, 2011 CEU eTD Collection Budapest CEU eTD Collection Notes on copyright and the ownership of intellectual property rights: (1) Copyright in text of this thesis rests with the Author. Copies (by any process) either in full, or of extracts, may be made only in accordance with instructions given by the Author and lodged in the Central European University Library. Details may be obtained from the Librarian. This page must form part of any such copies made. Further copies (by any process) of copies made in accordance with such instructions may not be made without the permission (in writing) of the Author. (2) The ownership of any intellectual property rights which may be described in this thesis is vested in the Central European University, subject to any prior agreement to the contrary, and may not be made available for use by third parties without the written permission of the University, which will prescribe the terms and conditions of any such agreement. (3) For bibliographic and reference purposes this thesis should be referred to as: Leventon, J. 2011. “We Don’t Eat Fish...” Science, Policy and EU Governance: The Implementation of Arsenic Limits for Drinking Water in a Hungarian Case Study, Doctoral thesis, Department of Environmental Sciences and Policy, Central European University, Budapest.
    [Show full text]
  • Commission Implementing Decision
    28.5.2020 EN Offi cial Jour nal of the European Union L 166/5 COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2020/711 of 27 May 2020 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/47 on protective measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H5N8 in certain Member States (notified under document C(2020) 3556) (Text with EEA relevance) THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Having regard to Council Directive 89/662/EEC of 11 December 1989 concerning veterinary checks in intra-Community trade with a view to the completion of the internal market (1), and in particular Article 9(4) thereof, Having regard to Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary checks applicable in intra-Union trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market (2), and in particular Article 10(4) thereof, Whereas: (1) Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/47 (3) was adopted following outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H5N8 in holdings where poultry are kept in certain Member States, and the establishment of protection and surveillance zones by those Member States in accordance with Council Directive 2005/94/EC (4). (2) Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/47 provides that the protection and surveillance zones established by the Member States listed in the Annex to that Implementing Decision, in accordance with Directive 2005/94/EC, are to comprise at least the areas listed as protection and surveillance zones in that Annex. (3) The Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/47 was recently amended by Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/661 (5), following outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H5N8 in poultry in Hungary that needed to be reflected in that Annex.
    [Show full text]
  • Adriatic Sea 84 Age Inversions 12 Algal Deposits 95 Flats 83 Nodules
    Index Sava 3 slope 101, 108 starved 36,61,143 Transcarpathian 3,40, 120 A Transylvanian 3, 40, 84, 95 Vienna 3,40,223,233 Adriatic Sea 84 basin ally restricted unit (BRU) 41,42, 43 age inversions 12 Neogene 1-318 algal (See also Miocene) deposits 95 Battonya 206,217 flats 83 -PusztafOldvar field 206 nodules (See rhodoliths) -PusztafOldvar high 57,62, 63 Algyo field 227,228 -PusztafOldvar trough 12, 13, 15, 19,20,36 Algyo Fm. 68,103,108, 109, 110,204,211,213, Battonya basement high 12,72,237 215,216 Battonya field 239,242,243,245,246,247 alluvial plain 99, 101, 102, 109, 110 Battonya-East field 239 Alpine orogenies 84 Bekes Conglomerate 189 Alpine-Carpathian foredeep 84 Bekes Fm. 68 Bekes trough 8,47 flysch 4 Bekes-Doboz trough 1, 12, 13,23,25,27,29,30, amplitude spectrum analysis 261 35,36 anoxic environment 83,95 Berggren time scale 136 API gravities of oils 161, 162 Biharugra Fm. 27 Apuseni Mountains 2,3,6,12,15,22,27,30,34, Bihor autochthon 23, 27, 30 35,36,37,40,55,222 bioclastic Arieseni nappe 18, 22 debris 71 autochthon (See Bihor) limestone 83 sediments 67,68 biological marker 162,164,180,181 B biostratigraphy 118,119, 145, 150 bioturbation 68, 72, 78 Badenian bottom currents 44 -Sarmatian boundary 84 bottomset reflections 108 deposits 87,91,93,94,95,96 erosion of strata 93 Bouma sequences 73, 76, 78 brackish waters 84 late 84 lithology 91 breccia 40, 83, 87 Bruhnes Polarity Chron 130, 139 lower 87 section 40 Budafa anticline 222, 230, 231, 232 Bilkk Mountains 40, 222 sediments 8, 42 BUkkaija Fm.
    [Show full text]
  • Complexity and Autonomy in Bronze Age Europe: Assessing Cultural Developments in Eastern Hungary
    COMPLEXITY AND AUTONOMY IN BRONZE AGE EUROPE: ASSESSING CULTURAL DEVELOPMENTS IN EASTERN HUNGARY by Paul R. Duffy A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Anthropology) in The University of Michigan 2010 Doctoral Committee: Professor John M. O’Shea, Chair Professor Daniel G. Brown Professor Robert E. Whallon Jr. Professor Henry T. Wright © Paul R. Duffy 2010 For my Mother and Father ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My interest in comparative anthropology was ignited during my undergraduate degree while taking classes with Bruce Trigger at McGill University. Although I found the comparison of states fascinating, my interest centered on the long developmental sequences that led to their formation. When I arrived in Ann Arbor in 2001, I wanted to compare the prehistoric trajectories of complex societies, and explain why they diverged. It was fortuitous that Joyce Marcus suggested I spend a summer in Hungary on Bill Parkinson’s NSF funded project in 2002. Meeting with Bill and Attila Gyucha, his Hungarian colleague, would set in motion close collaborative friendships that would allow the study of the eastern Hungarian Bronze Age contained within these pages. My debt to them and countless others is enormous. Many people facilitated my entry into Hungary. Pál Raczky generously provided input on my project when I was first becoming acquainted with the Hungarian Bronze Age. Magdi Vicze was very kind in introducing me to Százhalombatta archaeology and answering my questions about the Great Hungarian Plain. In and around Budapest, I have been warmly greeted by the next generation of Bronze Age specialists: Dani Fukőh, Brigitta Berzsényi, Vajk Szeverényi, Attila Kreiter, Gabi Kúlcsár, Viktória Kiss, Klara Fischl, László Reményi, János Dani and many others.
    [Show full text]
  • Rohu-444 Faf
    1st Restricted Call for Strategic Project Proposals - Full Application Form Project code ROHU-444 FAF ConCom TEN-T - Connecting communities to the TEN-T infrastructure in the Project Title Romanian - Hungarian border area 2 – Improve sustainable cross-border mobility and remove bottlenecks Priority Axis (Cooperating on cross-border accessibility) Investment 7/b Improving regional mobility through connecting secondary and tertiary nodes priority to TEN-T infrastructure, including multimodal nodes. Implementation 36 months (July 01, 2019 – June 30, 2022) period LB: Arad County (Romania) Partnership PP2: Békés County Foundation for Enterprise Development (Hungary) PP3: Curtici Town (Romania) Total 13,836,221.00 EUR, out of which EDRF 11,760,787.85 EUR LB: 7,384,287.45 EUR ERDF, 1,129,274.74 EUR national co-financing Project budget PP2: 839,392.00 EUR ERDF, 8,742.13 EUR national co-financing PP3: 3,537,108.40 EUR ERDF, 540,927.91 EUR national co-financing To connect communities to the TEN-T infrastructure in Arad and Békés counties, Objective in the meantime tackling the challenges posed by increased traffic. Contribution to Total length of newly built roads: 12.14 km indicators Total length of reconstructed or upgraded roads: 20.06 km The main obstacle in the mobility of the population in the cross border area is outdated infrastructure or even the lack of it, stunting the development of settlements with great potential for cooperation in the enlarged EU. Project main activities: on Romanian side: construction of 12,144 km of new roads, modernization of 20,06 km of roads in Arad County, for directly connecting the tertiary node Curtici town to the national road DN79 – part of the comprehensive TEN-T network; on Hungarian side: preparing 41 studies in Békés County for the Summary improvement of roads connecting 20 settlements – tertiary nodes to the TEN-T infrastructure, 1 impact assessment and 1 traffic study.
    [Show full text]
  • Nap Mérés Tervezett Ideje Mérés Tervezett Helye 01.00-02.00 Mezőkovácsháza, Árpád Utca 01.20-02.55 Gyula, Ajtóssy A
    BÉKÉS MEGYEI RENDŐR-FŐKAPITÁNYSÁG DECEMBER HAVI TRAFFI VEZÉNYLÉSEK IDŐPONTJAI ÉS HELYSZÍNEI 2017. április hónapra tervezett sebességmérések Nap Mérés tervezett ideje Mérés tervezett helye 01.00-02.00 Mezőkovácsháza, Árpád utca 01.20-02.55 Gyula, Ajtóssy A. utca 02.30-04.00 Kaszaper, Árpád utca, Petőfi utca 03.10-04.30 Gyula, Sarkadi út 04.30-05.15 Mezőkovácsháza, Árpád utca 04.45-06.20 Gyula, Nagyváradi út 06:30-08:10 Orosháza, Iglói utca 06:40-07:45 Szeghalom Széchenyi utca 07.25-09.55 Doboz, Nagyváradi út 07:55-08:55 Szeghalom Kinizsi utca 08.50 – 09.50 Kondoros, Csabai út 08:30-10:25 47. számú főútvonal Csorvás és Székkutas közötti szakasz 09:05-09:50 4212-es számú út Szeghalom és Füzesgyarmat között 10.00 - 11.00 44-es főút Kardos - Kondoros között 10.05-11.15 4244. számú út Doboz és Sarkad között 10:05-11:05 Szeghalom Kinizsi utca 10:45-12:25 Orosháza, Csorvási út 11.10 – 12.10 44-es főút Kardos - Kondoros között 11.25-12.45 4239. számú út Békéscsaba és Doboz között 11:15-11:45 Szeghalom Arany János utca 12.20 – 13.20 44-es főút Csabacsűd - Kardos között 1. 12:50-13:50 47-es számú főút Körösladány-Szeghalom között 13.55-14.55 Békéscsaba, Bajza utca 13:40-14:50 Orosháza, Székács József utca 14.20 – 15.20 Szarvas, Vasút utca 14:05-15:15 Szeghalom Kinizsi utca 15.05-16.15 Békéscsaba, Gyulai út 15.30 – 16.50 44-es főút Szarvas - Békésszentandrás között 15:10-17:00 47.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Melléklet a 15 2005 (X. 7.) KT Rendelethez
    4. melléklet a 15/2005. (X.7.) KT számú rendelethez1 1. Békés megye területrendezési terve által érintett települések Almáskamarás, Battonya, Békés, Békéscsaba, Békéssámson, Békésszentandrás, Bélmegyer, Biharugra, Bucsa, Csabacs űd, Csabaszabadi, Csanádapáca, Csárdaszállás, Csorvás, Dévaványa, Doboz, Dombegyház, Dombiratos, Ecsegfalva, Elek, Füzesgyarmat, Gádoros, Gerendás, Geszt, Gyomaendr őd, Gyula, Hunya, Kamut, Kardos, Kardoskút, Kaszaper, Kertészsziget, Kétegyháza, Kétsoprony, Kevermes, Kisdombegyház, Kondoros, Körösladány, Körösnagyharsány, Köröstarcsa, Körösújfalu, Kötegyán, Kunágota, Lőkösháza, Magyarbánhegyes, Magyardombegyház, Medgyesbodzás, Medgyesegyháza, Méhkerék, Mez őberény, Mez őgyán, Mez őhegyes, Mez őkovácsháza, Murony, Nagybánhegyes, Nagykamarás, Nagyszénás, Okány, Orosháza, Örménykút, Pusztaföldvár, Pusztaottlaka, Sarkad, Sarkadkeresztúr, Szabadkígyós, Szarvas, Szeghalom, Tarhos, Telekgerendás, Tótkomlós, Újkígyós, Újszalonta, Végegyháza, Vészt ő, Zsadány 2. Békés megyei m űszaki infrastruktúra-hálózatok és egyedi építmények rendszere 2.1. A közúthálózat f ő elemei 2.1.1. Gyorsforgalmi utak − M44: (Kecskemét térsége) – Békéscsaba – Gyula – (Románia) − M47: (Berettyóújfalu térsége) (M4) – Békéscsaba – (Algy ő térsége) (M43) 2.1.2. Főutak 2.1.2.1. A f őúthálózat elemei − 44.sz. f őút: (Kecskemét 5.sz.f őút) –Békéscsaba – Gyula – (Románia) − 443.sz.f őút: Gyomaendr őd (46.sz.f őút) – Szarvas (44.sz.f őút) − 46.sz. f őút: (Törökszentmiklós) (4.sz.f őút) – (Mez őtúr) – Gyomaendr őd – Mez őberény (47.sz. f őút) − 47.sz.f
    [Show full text]
  • Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development PROGRAMME
    Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development PROGRAMME-COMPLEMENT (PC) to the AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME (ARDOP) (2004-2006) Budapest June 2009 ARDOP PC modified by the ARDOP MC on 7 March 2006 and by written procedures on 18 August, 29 September 2006 and on 14 August 2007, revised according to the comments of the European Commission (ref.:AGRI 004597of 06.02.2007, AGRI 022644 of 05.09.07 and AGRI 029995 of 22.11 07.) 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 5 I.1 PROGRAMME COMPLEMENT....................................................................... 5 I.2 THE MANAGING AUTHORITY for ARDOP.................................................. 6 I.2.1 General description......................................................................................... 6 I.2.2 The MANAGING AUTHORITY in Hungary................................................ 6 I.2.3 Monitoring ...................................................................................................... 6 I.2.4 Financial Management and Control Arrangements ........................................ 6 I.2.5 Monitoring the capacities................................................................................ 6 I.3 THE PAYING AUTHORITY............................................................................. 6 I.4 THE INTERMEDIATE BODY .......................................................................... 6 I.5 THE FINAL BENEFICIARIES.........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fifth Report Submitted by Hungary
    ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES ACFC/SR/V(2019)005 Fifth Report submitted by Hungary Pursuant to Article 25, paragraph 2 of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities – received on 5 February 2019 ACFC/SR/V(2019)005 Prime Minister’s Office HUNGARY’S FIFTH REPORT on the execution of the Framework Convention of the Council of Europe for the Protection of National Minorities Budapest, January 2019 ACFC/SR/V(2019)005 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 5 I. STEPS RELATED TO THE VISIBILITY OF THE RESULTS OF THE FOURTH- CYCLE MONITORING ASSESSMENT, AND PRACTICAL MEASURES FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ................ 10 Representation of nationalities ................................................................................................. 10 Measures for awareness of the Framework Convention’s documents ..................................... 14 Involvement of nationalities in the formulation of the government’s policies ......................... 16 Seventh periodic report and results of the Language Charter ................................................. 22 II. MEASURES FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS RELATED TO SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES ........................................................................................................................... 23 General responses to the
    [Show full text]
  • State Report Hungary
    21 May 1999 ACFC/SR(1999)010 REPORT SUBMITTED BY HUNGARY PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 25, PARAGRAPH 1 OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES ACFC/SR(1999)010 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................... 3 PART I...................................................................................................................................... 3 Basic Information about the Country ......................................................................................... 3 Basic Historical Information...................................................................................................... 4 Minority Policy ........................................................................................................................12 Budget Funding for Minorities .................................................................................................14 Government Structures Concerned with Minority Affairs .........................................................17 National and Ethnic Minorities Office ......................................................................................18 Informing the Public on the Protection and Conditions of the Minorities ..................................19 PART II ...................................................................................................................................20 Article 1 ...................................................................................................................................20
    [Show full text]
  • Mezőkovácsháza RK KMB Névsor/Elérhetőség Ssz
    Mezőkovácsháza RK KMB névsor/elérhetőség Ssz. Teljes név Szolg. Mobil KMB iroda címe KMB iroda tsz. Külső elérhetőség (e-mail cím) Működési terület Fogadóóra (minden hó) 1. Szucsik Gábor r. őrm. (30)633-7184 Kunágota, Kossuth utca 75. nincs [email protected] Kunágota 2. hétfő 11-12 2. Lakatos Ákos r. őrm. (30)633-7184 Kunágota, Kossuth utca 75. nincs [email protected] Kunágota 3. hétfő 11-12 3. Kovács Béla r. tzls. (30)633-7186 Almáskamarás, Dózsa utca 54. nincs [email protected] Almáskamarás 1. hétfő 8-10 4. Csóti István r. őrm. (30)633-7184 Nagykamarás, Kossuth utca 2. nincs [email protected] Nagykamarás 1. hétfő 10-11 5. Grestyák András r. ftzls. nincs Mezőkovácsháza, Árpád 196-198. nincs [email protected] Mezőkovácsháza 3. kedd 10-12 6. Pertich Tamás r. ftzls. (30)633-7189 Nagybánhegyes, Kossuth utca 64. nincs [email protected] Nagybánhegyes 2. hétfő 10-12 7. Belák Bence r. ftőrm. (30)633-7191 Magyarbánhegyes, Kossuth utca 76. nincs [email protected] Magyarbánhegyes 1. hétfő 10-12 8. Németh László Róbert r. ftőrm. (30)633-7191 Magyarbánhegyes, Kossuth utca 76. nincs [email protected] Magyarbánhegyes 3. hétfő 10-12 9. Méreg Ferenc r. zls. (30)144-9525 Kaszaper, Szent Gellért tér 1. nincs [email protected] Kaszaper 2. hétfő 10-12 10. Almási János r. ftőrm. (30)633-7194 Végegyháza, Széchenyi utca 32. nincs [email protected] Végegyháza 3. hétfő 10-12 11. Tóth András r.
    [Show full text]