Complexity and Autonomy in Bronze Age Europe: Assessing Cultural Developments in Eastern Hungary
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
COMPLEXITY AND AUTONOMY IN BRONZE AGE EUROPE: ASSESSING CULTURAL DEVELOPMENTS IN EASTERN HUNGARY by Paul R. Duffy A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Anthropology) in The University of Michigan 2010 Doctoral Committee: Professor John M. O’Shea, Chair Professor Daniel G. Brown Professor Robert E. Whallon Jr. Professor Henry T. Wright © Paul R. Duffy 2010 For my Mother and Father ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My interest in comparative anthropology was ignited during my undergraduate degree while taking classes with Bruce Trigger at McGill University. Although I found the comparison of states fascinating, my interest centered on the long developmental sequences that led to their formation. When I arrived in Ann Arbor in 2001, I wanted to compare the prehistoric trajectories of complex societies, and explain why they diverged. It was fortuitous that Joyce Marcus suggested I spend a summer in Hungary on Bill Parkinson’s NSF funded project in 2002. Meeting with Bill and Attila Gyucha, his Hungarian colleague, would set in motion close collaborative friendships that would allow the study of the eastern Hungarian Bronze Age contained within these pages. My debt to them and countless others is enormous. Many people facilitated my entry into Hungary. Pál Raczky generously provided input on my project when I was first becoming acquainted with the Hungarian Bronze Age. Magdi Vicze was very kind in introducing me to Százhalombatta archaeology and answering my questions about the Great Hungarian Plain. In and around Budapest, I have been warmly greeted by the next generation of Bronze Age specialists: Dani Fukőh, Brigitta Berzsényi, Vajk Szeverényi, Attila Kreiter, Gabi Kúlcsár, Viktória Kiss, Klara Fischl, László Reményi, János Dani and many others. At the Munkácsy Mihály Museum in Békéscsaba, Imre Szátmari was infinitely gracious in supporting my surface collection, providing resources and work space, and allowing his archaeologists to spend time out at my excavations. Pál Medgyesi, another archaeologist at the museum, answered many of my questions about the excavation and survey of Sarkad-Peckesi-domb. Marietta Csányi and Judit Tárnóki received me at the county museum in Szolnok and were very generous to lead me through the material culture and chronology of the Körös area. Sándor Hornok, mayor of the village of Tarhos, enthusiastically supported my excavations. iii Alice Choyke and Laci Bartociewicz invariably provided amazing hospitality when I stayed in Budapest and encouraged my fascination with the Bronze Age. Ferenc Horváth, Éva and Ottó Fogas received me many times in Szeged when I was still finding my way around a Hungarian spakli. Special thanks go to Tim Earle for reading an early draft and providing very useful advice when I was formulating my NSF proposal. Tim also generously hosted me in the Benta Valley project in 2006 and helped improve my survey methods. Throughout the duration of the project, Gergely Bóka was my collaborator and tireless supporter, without whose guidance I would have certainly strayed. The friendship and archaeological expertise of Dori Kékegyi and Gábor (Baxi) Bácsmegi were likewise responsible for any success I have had with archaeological deposits in the Hungarian countryside. Special thanks are due to Amy Nicodemus, Chris Papalas, and Márton Tibor for rigorous analyses of the archaeological material collected over the course of two years. Tim Parsons and Amy Nicodemus in addition spent several weeks with me in the field on survey and excavation. Several colleagues came out for a few days to lend a trowel and support at the excavation, including Éva Fogasné, Klára Medgyesi, Tamás Polanyi, Eric Rupley and Rod Salisbury. Darren Poltorak joined the team last, but stayed on for a heroic three month stretch with very long days. In this time, we completed a tremendous amount of work. The underpinnings of my theoretical perspective result from many stimulating conversations with close friends, especially in Ann Arbor. Many of these were held in the spirited atmosphere of the Monday Night Reading Group at a local pub. Regular members include my good friends Howard Tsai, Stephen Dueppen, Allison Davis, Dan and Christina Pugh, and Kenny Sims. A Bronze Age Europe reading group convened after I returned from Hungary, bringing together Seth Button, Em Holt, Adela Sobotkova, Amy Nicodemus, Alice Wright, and Eric Rupley. The diversity of opinions and experiences was an exciting return to Bronze Age literature after almost two years in the field. Outside of reading groups, I have been fortunate to enjoy the company of Randy Hicks, Cameron Gokee, Hemanth Kadambi, Helen Dixon, Davorka (Seki) Radovic, and Tim Horsley. My brother Earl and sister Maureen have also been very supportive throughout my graduate career. iv My year and a half stay in Hungary was made an absolute pleasure by the companionship and support of my closest friends Vajk Szeverényi, Dori Kékegyi, Gergő Bóka, Bill Parkinson, and Attila Gyucha. Vajk, Billy and Attila have read my work in various drafts and it is much improved because of it. Finally, I cannot extend warm enough gratitude for my friendships with Laura C. Brown, Eric Rupley, and Ashley (Mittens) Lemke. My life in Ann Arbor has been a joy because of them. My field research was funded by the National Science Foundation, the Rackham International Research Award, the International Institute, and the James B. Griffin Research Award from the Department of Anthropology. Two years of writing in Ann Arbor were supported by the Department of Anthropology, a fellowship in the Mischa Titiev Anthropology Library, and a Rackham One-Term Write-Up Fellowship. Critical digital maps of eastern Hungary were obtained through the generous assistance of Karl Longstreth, the Map Librarian at the University of Michigan Map Library. My sincere thanks go to my committee – Henry Wright, Bob Whallon, and Dan Brown – for getting through a sizeable manuscript in a very short time and providing me with excellent comments. Special thanks go to Dan Brown for joining as my cognate member late in the writing process. Finally, I extend my profound gratitude to my chair, John O’Shea, for giving me the intellectual freedom to study prehistory in a way I found engaging, but also for challenging me to make it relevant for other anthropologists. This dissertation is dedicated to my mother and father. They gave me the sails and compass to explore the world, but also have provided an island and harbour of love and support. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Dedication........................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgements............................................................................................................iii List of Figures..................................................................................................................viii List of Tables ...................................................................................................................xiii List of Appendices .......................................................................................................... xvii Abstract..........................................................................................................................xviii Chapter 1: Introduction....................................................................................................... 1 THEORETICAL CONTEXT ............................................................................................. 2 A GENERAL APPROACH FOR A SPECIFIC TRAJECTORY........................................... 3 STRUCTURE OF THE THESIS ........................................................................................ 5 Chapter 2: Bronze Age Europe, the People without History.............................................. 8 PART I: WEALTH, INDO-EUROPEANS, AND THE CONQUEST OF GAUL................. 10 PART II: ANALOGY, HOMOLOGY AND MODELS FOR THE BRONZE AGE.............. 26 PART III: THE SOCIAL CONTEXT OF BRONZE .......................................................... 36 CONCLUSION............................................................................................................... 39 Chapter 3: Background to a Study of Middle-Range Society........................................... 42 INTELLECTUAL FRAMEWORK .................................................................................. 43 DIMENSION 1: PRIMARY UNIT OF FOOD PRODUCTION / CONSUMPTION............. 60 DIMENSION 2: SEGMENTATION................................................................................. 63 DIMENSION 3: HOUSEHOLD DISTINCTIONS............................................................. 65 DIMENSION 4: ACCESS TO EXOTICS ......................................................................... 67 DIMENSION 5: CRAFT PRODUCTION......................................................................... 68 DIMENSION 6: DEMOGRAPHIC SCALE...................................................................... 70 DIMENSION 7: INTENSIFICATION OF FOOD PRODUCTION..................................... 72 DIMENSION 8: REGIONAL CONSOLIDATION............................................................ 73 CONCLUSION............................................................................................................... 75 Chapter 4: The Geo-environmental Setting ...................................................................... 77 PART