DOCSLIB.ORG

A Thesis Submitted to the Department

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

A thesis submitted to the Department of Environmental Sciences and Policy of Central European University in part fulfilment of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy “We Don’t Eat Fish...” Science, Policy and EU Governance: The Implementation of Arsenic Limits for Drinking Water in a Hungarian Case Study Julia LEVENTON June, 2011 CEU eTD Collection Budapest CEU eTD Collection Notes on copyright and the ownership of intellectual property rights: (1) Copyright in text of this thesis rests with the Author. Copies (by any process) either in full, or of extracts, may be made only in accordance with instructions given by the Author and lodged in the Central European University Library. Details may be obtained from the Librarian. This page must form part of any such copies made. Further copies (by any process) of copies made in accordance with such instructions may not be made without the permission (in writing) of the Author. (2) The ownership of any intellectual property rights which may be described in this thesis is vested in the Central European University, subject to any prior agreement to the contrary, and may not be made available for use by third parties without the written permission of the University, which will prescribe the terms and conditions of any such agreement. (3) For bibliographic and reference purposes this thesis should be referred to as: Leventon, J. 2011. “We Don’t Eat Fish...” Science, Policy and EU Governance: The Implementation of Arsenic Limits for Drinking Water in a Hungarian Case Study, Doctoral thesis, Department of Environmental Sciences and Policy, Central European University, Budapest. Further information on the conditions under which disclosures and exploitation may take place is available from the Head of the Department of Environmental Sciences and Policy, Central European University. CEU eTD Collection i Author’s declaration No portion of the work referred to in this thesis has been submitted in support of an application for another degree or qualification of this or any other university or other institute of learning. Furthermore, this thesis contains no materials previously written and/or published by another person, except where appropriate acknowledgment is made in the form of bibliographical reference, etc. Julia Leventon CEU eTD Collection ii THE CENTRAL EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY ABSTRACT OF THESIS submitted by: Julia LEVENTON for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy and entitled: “We Don’t Eat Fish...” Science, Policy and EU Governance: The Implementation of Arsenic Limits for Drinking Water in a Hungarian Case Study. Month and Year of submission: June, 2011. This thesis examines the causes of Hungarian non-implementation of EU legislation for controlling arsenic in drinking water. Natural concentrations of arsenic are found in groundwater and soil systems throughout the world. Where these groundwater resources are used as a source of drinking water, people are exposed to arsenic, presenting a threat to human health. Chronic exposure to arsenic has been linked to skin, bladder and lung cancers, and a variety of other diseases including ischemic heart disease and diabetes. In order to prevent these health impacts, numerous legislative agencies set limits for concentrations of arsenic in drinking water. The EU sets a limit of 10 ppb (ȝg/l). This limit is adopted by all member states that must then juggle social, scientific, economic and political considerations to ensure it is met. Hungary heavily relies on drinking water sourced from high-arsenic groundwater. However, despite adopting the EU limits, much of the water delivered exceeds 10 ppb. This puts approximately one quarter of the population at risk from arsenic-related health problems. This thesis seeks to explain this governance failure. The methods employed in this research take a multi-disciplinary, holistic approach to examining the institutions of governance in Hungary. A case study of Békés County in South Eastern Hungary is examined. A policy review is conducted, covering every level of policy to characterise the institutional structures of drinking water management, and to highlight points of administrative and scientific failure in the multi-level governance system. Discourse data is collected from every policy actor. This is used to explore the policy related beliefs of the actor, according to analytical frameworks taken from the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF). These are explored to examine points of clash between policy actors and the institutional structure in terms of beliefs about the content and approach of policies and the assignment of roles. These points of mismatch are used to explain how implementation deficits occur, how they interact, and therefore what the underlying causes of governance failure are. The results show that governance failures are created when policy actors do not adjust their beliefs to match those incorporated into the policies and institutional structures of the EU. Resistance to institutional adoption results from the persistence of actor beliefs incorporated under previous governance institutions, and because of the lack of information or resources CEU eTD Collection available to facilitate belief change. In particular, a lack of scientific justification behind the 10 ppb limit prevents the availability of such information. These findings expand upon current understandings of structure-agency interactions of institutions in EU governance systems, and the role this plays in policy implementation. Recommendations are made for further research to improve current understandings of governance failures in the EU. Recommendations are also iii made for the improvement of policy implementation, including the rectification of scientific errors incorporated into policy, and the way in which policy rationale is communicated to policy actors. Keywords: Environmental governance, Arsenic, Groundwater, Implementation, Hungary, Europeanisation, Institutions, Advocacy Coalition Framework CEU eTD Collection iv Acknowledgements Funding I acknowledge funding from the European Commission (AquaTRAIN MRTN-CT-2006-035420). I am also grateful for a six-month write-up grant provided by the Central European University. People I am thankful that my PhD experience has been vastly enriched by a large number of people, across multiple countries who interact with many areas of my life. All of them have offered opportunities and supported me in ways they probably didn’t even realise. I am not sure that an acknowledgments page does them all justice, but I would like to take this opportunity to say thank you: Thesis Committee: To Prof. Alexios Antypas (CEU, supervisor), Prof. Ruben Mnatsakanian (CEU, committee member) and Dr. Petr Jehliþka (The Open University, UK, opponent). It is special to me that I can count amongst my acknowledgments Dr. Lindsay Stringer (Leeds University, external supervisor) who has supported me since my undergraduate degree. Participants: To the numerous study participants, without whom this thesis would not have been possible. Thank you for your time, encouragement and enthusiasm. I hope I have the opportunity to return the many favours one day. AquaTRAIN Colleagues: To the lead scientists, I thank you for your guidance and opportunities, with special mention to Prof. Dave Polya (network coordinator) and Dr. Stephan Hug. To the researchers, I thank you for the discussion, support and especially friendship, with special mention to the soon-to-be Dr.s Aimee Hegan, Claudia Cascio, Chris Parsons. In Hungary: To my Hungarian supporters, helpers and friends Orsi Korsos, Edina Muray, Zsuzsanna Fehér, Zsófia Szi-Ferenc, thank you for the help, advice and support. To my PhD colleagues and staff (and friends) in the Department of Environmental Science and Policy, thank your for the help and discussion, especially Krisztina Szabados, Irina Herczeg and Prof. Alan Watt. In Italy: To staff (and friends) in the Soils Action, particularly Luca Montanarella, Gergely Tóth, Frank Verheijen, Vit Penizek and Simon Jeffery. In Greece: To staff (and friends) in the HERS Lab, particularly Nikos Nikolaidis, Leeda Demetropoulou (and family), Daniel Moraetis and Fotini Stamati. In the Czech Republic: To the Mildorf family, Vaclav, Milada, David, Tereza and Vojta. Thank you for accepting and supporting (and feeding) me. Those Without Borders: To my friends, Aida Geragusian, Paul Rockliffe, Melissa Davis, CEU eTD Collection Andrew Lister, Brigit Chesworth and Matt Bond, thank you for coming on the journey with me. Finally to my family, Jill, Charlie and Martin Leventon, Clare Baker and Tomáš Mildorf, all of the above thanks apply to you and yet somehow don’t quite feel big enough. v Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. THE ARSENIC PROBLEM ............................................................................................................. 1 1.2. THE IMPORTANCE OF EU POLICY................................................................................................ 7 1.3. THE THESIS: RESEARCH AIMS AND CONTEXT ........................................................................... 12 2. POLICY IMPLEMENTATION AND POLICY FAILURES IN THE EU................................. 19 2.1. IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH: DEFINITIONS AND FRAMEWORKS .............................................. 19 2.2. APPLICATION TO ARSENIC MANAGEMENT ...............................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Kerékpáros Nevezések 2017. Név Szül

    Kerékpáros Nevezések 2017. Név Szül

    Kerékpáros nevezések 2017. Név Szül. év Irányítószám Város Abordánné Antal Éva 1969 5800 Mezőkovácsháza Ale László 1973 5800 Mezőkovácsháza Almási Árpád 1974 9400 Sopron Almási Diána 1998 5666 Medgyesegyháza Almási Ferenc 1966 5700 Gyula Almási Gyöngyvér 1967 5630 Békés Almási Levente 2002 5666 Medgyesegyháza Almási Levente Zsolt 1966 5666 Medgyesegyháza Almási Orsolya 1996 5700 Gyula Almási Tamás 1980 5800 Mezőkovácsháza Almásiné Verbai Éva 1970 5666 Medgyesegyháza Andó István 1949 5600 Békéscsaba Arany László 1981 5600 Békéscsaba Árva András 1968 6900 Makó Babusa Attila 1974 9400 Sopron Babusáné Czimbó Anikó 1976 9400 Sopron Bagi Ágnes 1982 5600 Békéscsaba Bagi Imre 1990 5600 Békéscsaba Bagi Tamás 1965 5600 Békéscsaba Bagyinkáné Győrfi Zsuzsanna 1964 5600 Békéscsaba Bajiné Somogyi Lilla 1960 5600 Békéscsaba Baka Benedetta 1992 5600 Békéscsaba Bakó Norbert 1995 5800 Mezőkovácsháza Bakó Pálné 1975 5800 Mezőkovácsháza Bakos Zoltán 1971 6723 Szeged Bakosné Szeles Anikó 1973 6723 Szeged Balázs Imre 1966 5800 Mezőkovácsháza Balázs József 1957 5800 Mezőkovácsháza Balázs Mihály István 1968 5600 Békéscsaba Bali Péter 1971 5666 Medgyesegyháza Bálint Lászlóné 1961 5630 Békés Balla Dávid Péter 1996 5600 Békéscsaba Balog Barnabás 2003 5624 Doboz Balog Sándor 1971 5624 Doboz Balogh László 1967 5600 Békéscsaba Balogh Tamás 1977 5820 Mezőhegyes Bánáti Zoltán 1957 5600 Békéscsaba Bánszki Bence 1996 5600 Békéscsaba Barna Attila Gábor 1987 5940 Tótkomlós Barta Botond 1968 5000 Szolnok Bartolák Imre 1989 5600 Békéscsaba Batki Tamás 1966 5600 Békéscsaba
  • Act Cciii of 2011 on the Elections of Members Of

    Act Cciii of 2011 on the Elections of Members Of

    Strasbourg, 15 March 2012 CDL-REF(2012)003 Opinion No. 662 / 2012 Engl. only EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) ACT CCIII OF 2011 ON THE ELECTIONS OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT OF HUNGARY This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL-REF(2012)003 - 2 - The Parliament - relying on Hungary’s legislative traditions based on popular representation; - guaranteeing that in Hungary the source of public power shall be the people, which shall pri- marily exercise its power through its elected representatives in elections which shall ensure the free expression of the will of voters; - ensuring the right of voters to universal and equal suffrage as well as to direct and secret bal- lot; - considering that political parties shall contribute to creating and expressing the will of the peo- ple; - recognising that the nationalities living in Hungary shall be constituent parts of the State and shall have the right ensured by the Fundamental Law to take part in the work of Parliament; - guaranteeing furthermore that Hungarian citizens living beyond the borders of Hungary shall be a part of the political community; in order to enforce the Fundamental Law, pursuant to Article XXIII, Subsections (1), (4) and (6), and to Article 2, Subsections (1) and (2) of the Fundamental Law, hereby passes the following Act on the substantive rules for the elections of Hungary’s Members of Parliament: 1. Interpretive provisions Section 1 For the purposes of this Act: Residence: the residence defined by the Act on the Registration of the Personal Data and Resi- dence of Citizens; in the case of citizens without residence, their current addresses.
  • Official Journal C 119 of the European Union

    Official Journal C 119 of the European Union

    Official Journal C 119 of the European Union Volume 58 English edition Information and Notices 14 April 2015 Contents II Information INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES European Commission 2015/C 119/01 Initiation of proceedings (Case M.7419 — TeliaSonera/Telenor/JV) (1) ............................................. 1 IV Notices NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES European Commission 2015/C 119/02 Euro exchange rates .............................................................................................................. 2 NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES 2015/C 119/03 Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Changes to public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services (1) .................................... 3 EN (1) Text with EEA relevance 2015/C 119/04 Commission notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations (1) ............................................................................................................ 4 2015/C 119/05 Communication from the Minister for National Development of Hungary pursuant to Article 3(2) of Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons ..................... 5 2015/C 119/06 Communication from the Minister for National Development of Hungary pursuant to Article 3(2) of Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons ....................
  • Békés Megye Népessége Az Egészségi Állapot Tükrében

    Békés Megye Népessége Az Egészségi Állapot Tükrében

    TÁRSADALOMORVOSTAN SOCIAL HYGIENE Békés megye népessége az egészségi állapot tükrében Population of Békés County in the Mirror of Health Status BEKE SZILVIA Gál Ferenc Főiskola, Egészség- és Szociális Tudományi Kar, Gyula Gál Ferenc College Faculty of Health and Social Sience Gyula Összefoglalás: A tanulmány célja, hogy átfogó képet adjon Békés megye népességének egészségi állapotáról és egészségügyi ellátásáról, valamint betekintést nyújtson ennek az elmúlt közel egy évtized alatti változásáról. A tanulmány elsősorban szekunder adatelemzésre és korábbi kutatási eredményekre, tapasztalatokra támaszkodik, egyúttal egy jelenleg zajló kutatási projekt esettanulmányainak megalapozását szolgálja. Az elemzések eredményeként elmondható, hogy Békés megye demográfiai és morbiditási mutatói nem javultak az elmúlt egy évtized alatt, ugyanakkor egészségügyi ellátása bár problémákkal küzd, nincs rosszabb helyzetben az ország többi területéhez képest. A megye településeinek ellátottsága kapcsán azonban jelentős területi egyenlőtlenségek tapasztalhatóak, melyek elsősorban bizony os egészségügyi szolgáltatások kapcsán nyilvánulnak meg. Kulcsszavak: egészségföldrajz, egészségi állapot, egészségegyenlőtlenség, demográfia, területi egyenlőtlenség, Abstract: The aim of the study is to provide a comprehensive picture of the health conditions and health care of the population of Békés County and to provide an insight into the conditions of the past decade. The study mainly relies on secondary data analy ses and previous research findings and experiences, and serves as a basis for case studies of a current research project. As a result of the analyses, the demographic and morbidity indicators of Békés County have not improved over the past deca de, the health care is struggling, but it is not in worse situation than the rest of the country. However, in relation to the supply of settlements in the county, significant territorial inequalities can be observed, mainly due to certain health services.
  • 3 Cultural Policy and Cultural Diversity A

    3 Cultural Policy and Cultural Diversity A

    Strasbourg,2 October 2002 DGIV/CULT/POL/trans(2002) 3 CULTURAL POLICY AND CULTURAL DIVERSITY A TRANSVERSAL STUDY YEAR TWO REPORT HUNGARY CULTURAL POLICY AND CULTURAL DIVERSITY A TRANSVERSAL STUDY Hungarian national report Prepared by: The Ministry of Cultural Heritage Budapest Dr. Zoltán József Tóth 2002 2 SUMMARY OVERVIEW 5 1. MAPPING CULTURAL DIVERSITY 7 1. INTRODUCTION 7 1.A. THE POSITION OF THE NATIONAL MINORITIES AND THE ETHNIC COMPOSITION OF THE POPULATION BEFORE 1945 7 1.B. THE POSITION OF THE NATIONAL MINORITIES IN HUNGARY BETWEEN 1945 AND 1990 8 2. THE LEGAL POSITION OF THE NATIONAL AND ETHNIC MINORITIES BETWEEN 1990 AND 2002. THE 1993 MINORITIES’ ACT. 9 3. DEMOGRAPHY 1941-2001 14 4. THE GOVERNMENT STRUCTURE INVOLVING MINORITY AFFAIRS 17 5. THE SYSTEM OF STATE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE 18 C. 21 6. THE SITUATION OF NATIONALITIES /ETHNIC GROUPS LISTED IN THE ACT ON MINORITIES 22 1. BULGARIANS OF HUNGARY 22 2. THE ROMA OF HUNGARY 22 3.) GREEKS IN HUNGARY 27 4.) CROATS OF HUNGARY 27 5. POLES IN HUNGARY 28 6.) GERMANS IN HUNGARY 29 7. ARMENIANS IN HUNGARY 30 8. ROMANIANS OF HUNGARY 30 9. RUTHENIANS OF HUNGARY 31 10. SERBS OF HUNGARY 32 11. SLOVAKS OF HUNGARY 32 12. SLOVENES OF HUNGARY 33 13. UKRAINIANS OF HUNGARY 34 7. ETHNIC GROUPS NOT REGARDED AS NATIONAL OR ETHNIC MINORITIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACT ON MINORITIES 34 II. MAPPING CULTURAL POLICY (CULTURAL POLICY, THE ARTS AND THE MEDIA) 35 1. POLICIES AND CULTURAL POLITICS FROM 1945 TO 1989 35 1. LITERATURE 35 2. THE ARTS OF HUNGARY BETWEEN 1945 AND 1989 37 3.
  • A 2-14 Sebes-Körös Alegység Vízgyűjtő-Gazdálkodási Terv Kézirata

    A 2-14 Sebes-Körös Alegység Vízgyűjtő-Gazdálkodási Terv Kézirata

    A Víz Keretirányelv hazai megvalósítása VÍZGYŐJTİ-GAZDÁLKODÁSI TERV 2-14. jelő, Sebes-Körös vízgyőjtı közreadja: Vízügyi és Környezetvédelmi Központi Igazgatóság, Körös-vidéki Környezetvédelmi és Vízügyi Igazgatóság 2009. szeptember VÍZGYŐJTİ-GAZDÁLKODÁSI TERV 2-14 Sebes-Körös TARTALOM BEVEZETİ...........................................................................................................................1 1 VÍZGYŐJTİK ÉS VÍZTESTEK JELLEMZÉSE ..............................................................2 1.1 Természeti környezet........................................................................................................................3 1.1.1 Domborzat, éghajlat................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1.2 Földtan, talajtakaró .................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1.3 Vízföldtan................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.1.4 Vízrajz........................................................................................................................................................ 7 1.1.5 Él ıvilág ...................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.2 Társadalmi és gazdasági viszonyok ...............................................................................................7
  • 1 Dr. Kolbex István

    1 Dr. Kolbex István

    ama Mellékletek : adagi : 1 REGIONÁLIS FEJLESZTÉSÉRT ÉS FELZÁRKÓZTATÁSÉRT FELELŐS TÁRCA NÉLKÜLI MINISZTER ütés Hivatala irományszám: XU3010/2/05 Erdős Norbert úr Érkezett_ 2005 pKT 0 5, Országgyűlési képviselő részére Tisztelt Képviselő Úr! Dr. Lamperth Mónika miniszter asszonyhoz intézett és a Házszabály 91 . § (2) bekezdésében foglaltak alapján írásbeli választ igénylő, „Milyen pályázatok érkeztek a Békés Megyei Területfejlesztési Tanácshoz? címmel K/17575 ; K/17576; K/17577, K117578, K117579 ; K/17580 ; K/17581 ; K/17582; K/17583 ; K117584 ; K/17585 számon feltett kérdésére - ennek tárgya szerint feladat- és hatáskörrel rendelkező miniszterként - mellékelten megküldöm a pályázatokat bemutató táblázatot . Budapest, 2005. október 4. Üdvözlettel: Dr. Kolbex István Melléklet TEKI 2002 Beadott és támogatásban részesített pályázatok Pályázó önkormányzat Fejlesztés Ósszköltség Igényelt tám. Megítélt tám. Battonya Kossuth utca útépítés 29 012 000 11 604 800 8700000 Békés 49 db belterületi út aszfaltozása 134 500 000 94 150 000 Békésszentandrás Szent András utcai közúti híd korszerűsítése 12 373 304 8 661 313 8 661 313 Békésszentandrás Szt. László utcai gyűjtőút építése 17 111 250 11 977 875 Bélmegyer Külterületi tanyák vízellátása 35 000 000 28 000 000 Bélmegyer Óvoda felújítása 10 685 000 8 548 000 Biharugra Zöldfa utca útépítés 18 875 000 13 212 500 Csabacsűd Petőfi utca útépítés 18 200 000 9 900 000 9900000 Csabaszabadi Mező utca útépítés II . ütem 8 253163 5777214 Csanádapáca Tartalék ivóvízkút fúrása 4375000 2625000 2 625 000 Csanádapáca
  • Hunya Község Önkormányzata Képviselő-Testület 2017. Augusztus

    Hunya Község Önkormányzata Képviselő-Testület 2017. Augusztus

    ELŐTERJESZTÉSEK Hunya Község Önkormányzata Képviselő-testület 2017. augusztus 30. napján tartandó rendes üléséhez 1. napirendi pont ELŐTERJESZTÉS A Képviselő-testület 2017. augusztus 30-i ülésére Tárgy: Partnerségi egyeztetés helyi szabályairól szóló rendelet alkotása Készítette: Megyeri László, Dr. Uhrin Anna jegyző Előterjesztő: Hegedüs Roland polgármester Véleményező bizottság: Ügyrendi Bizottság Tisztelt Képviselő-testület! Az épített környezet alakításáról és védelméről szóló törvény (a továbbiakban: Étv.) határozza meg az Önkormányzat településfejlesztéssel és településrendezéssel összefüggő általános feladatait. Az Étv. 3. §-ában foglaltak alapján a közérdekű intézkedéseket és döntéseket megelőzően, illetőleg azok végrehajtása során biztosítani kell a nyilvánosságot és a közösségi ellenőrzés lehetőségét, valamint gondoskodni kell az érdekelt természetes személyek, jogi személyek és jogi személyiség nélküli szervezetek megfelelő tájékoztatásáról, és lehetőséget kell adni részükre véleménynyilvánításra és javaslattételre. Az elmúlt évben az Országgyűlés elfogadta a településkép védelméről szóló 2016. évi LXXIV. törvényt (a továbbiakban: Tv.), valamit a Tv. végrehajtási rendeleteként módosításra került a településfejlesztési koncepcióról, az integrált településfejlesztési stratégiáról és a településrendezési eszközökről, valamint egyes településrendezési sajátos jogintézményekről szóló 314/2012. (IX. 8.) Kormányrendelet. Az új jogszabály a településkép védelmével kapcsolatos helyi szabályozást új alapokra helyezi. A településeknek
  • V Ö L G Y Z U G O L Y M Ű H E L Y K F

    V Ö L G Y Z U G O L Y M Ű H E L Y K F

    V ö l g y z u g o l y M ű h e l y K f t . Településrendezési eszközök módosítása Véleményezési eljárás anyaga ÖRMÉNYKÚT 33/2007. (IV.23.) sz. határozattal elfogadott Településszerkezeti terv és 8/2007. (IV.24.) önk. rendelet a Helyi Építési Szabályzatról MÓDOSÍTÁSA TÖBB RÉSZTERÜLETRE VONATKOZÓAN VÉLEMÉNYEZÉSI ELJÁRÁS ANYAGA 2016. február Megrendelő: Örménykút Község Önkormányzata Szakács Jánosné polgármester 5556 Örménykút, Dózsa György utca 26. Tervező: Völgyzugoly Műhely Kft 2083 Solymár, Bimbó utca 20. Tel/Fax: 06-1-439-04-90 Mobil: 06/20-913-8575, 06/70-944-3015, 06/70-938-3223 www.vzm.hu, [email protected] ÖRMÉNYKÚT TELEPÜLÉSRENDEZÉSI ESZKÖZÖK MÓDOSÍTÁSA VÉLEMÉNYEZÉSI ELJÁRÁS ANYAGA 2 Aláírólap Településrendezés Ferik Tünde vezető településrendező tervező TT/1 13-1259 Südi Beáta építészmérnök Korsós Renáta okl. településmérnök Tájrendezés, Kéthelyi Márton környezetvédelem okl. tájépítészmérnök tájvédelmi szakértő TK 01-5282 Vízi közművek, Hanczár Zoltánné energiaközművek, távközlés okl. gépészmérnök és okl. városépítési-városüzemeltetési szakmérnök MK: 01-2418 (KÉSZ Kft.) Bíró Attila okl. építőmérnök MK: 01-2456 Csima - Takács Judit okl. tájépítészmérnök Munkatárs Végh Anna településmérnök gyakornok VZM1311/15 2016. február örmenykut_munkaközi_160219.doc VÖLGYZUGOLY MŰHELY Kft. 2016. www.vzm.hu ÖRMÉNYKÚT TELEPÜLÉSRENDEZÉSI ESZKÖZÖK MÓDOSÍTÁSA VÉLEMÉNYEZÉSI ELJÁRÁS ANYAGA 3 TARTALOMJEGYZÉK BEVEZETŐ ....................................................................................... 6 JÓVÁHAGYANDÓ MUNKARÉSZEK...........................................................
  • L155 Official Journal

    L155 Official Journal

    Official Journal L 155 of the European Union Volume 63 English edition Legislation 18 May 2020 Contents II Non-legislative acts REGULATIONS ★ Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/657 of 15 May 2020 correcting certain language versions of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2450 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to the templates for the submission of information to the supervisory authorities according to Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) . 1 ★ Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/658 of 15 May 2020 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/309 imposing a definitive countervailing duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty on imports of certain rainbow trout originating in Turkey following an interim review pursuant to Article 19(4) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 of the European Parliament and of the Council . 3 DECISIONS ★ Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/659 of 15 May 2020 on the harmonised standard for the technical documentation required for assessing materials, components and electrical and electronic equipment drafted in support of Directive 2011/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council . 12 ★ Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/660 of 15 May 2020 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1326 as regards the electromagnetic compatibility of electromechanical contactors and motor-starters, arc quenching devices, distribution boards intended to be operated by ordinary persons and industrial trucks . 16 ★ Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/661 of 15 May 2020 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/47 on protective measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H5N8 in certain Member States (notified under document C(2020) 3319) (1) .
  • Arsenic in Drinking Water and Pregnancy Outcomes:An Overview of the Hungarian Findings

    Arsenic in Drinking Water and Pregnancy Outcomes:An Overview of the Hungarian Findings

    In: Arsenic ISBN: 978-1-62081-320-1 Editor: Andrea Masotti © 2013 Nova Science Publishers, Inc. No part of this digital document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted commercially in any form or by any means. The publisher has taken reasonable care in the preparation of this digital document, but makes no expressed or implied warranty of any kind and assumes no responsibility for any errors or omissions. No liability is assumed for incidental or consequential damages in connection with or arising out of information contained herein. This digital document is sold with the clear understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, medical or any other professional services. Chapter 8 ARSENIC IN DRINKING WATER AND PREGNANCY OUTCOMES: AN OVERVIEW OF THE HUNGARIAN FINDINGS (1985-2005) Peter Rudnai, Mihály Csanády, Mátyás Borsányi and Mihály Kádár National Institute of Environmental Health, Budapest, Hungary ABSTRACT In 1981 a country-wide survey revealed that in South-East Hungary more than 400,000 people were exposed to high levels (> 50 g/L) of arsenic in the drinking water supplied by certain deep wells. This chapter presents detailed data of three retrospective ecological epidemiological studies conducted between 1985 and 2005 on pregnancy outcomes in the affected area. These studies used district nurses’ yearly reports based on the records of pregnancy care units and revealed significant associations between high arsenic levels of the supplied drinking water and the frequency of adverse pregnancy outcomes (stillbirth, perinatal mortality and, especially, spontaneous abortion). As the arsenic level was gradually lowered, the frequency of these adverse birth outcomes also decreased.
  • Commission Implementing Decision

    Commission Implementing Decision

    28.5.2020 EN Offi cial Jour nal of the European Union L 166/5 COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2020/711 of 27 May 2020 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/47 on protective measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H5N8 in certain Member States (notified under document C(2020) 3556) (Text with EEA relevance) THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Having regard to Council Directive 89/662/EEC of 11 December 1989 concerning veterinary checks in intra-Community trade with a view to the completion of the internal market (1), and in particular Article 9(4) thereof, Having regard to Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary checks applicable in intra-Union trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market (2), and in particular Article 10(4) thereof, Whereas: (1) Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/47 (3) was adopted following outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H5N8 in holdings where poultry are kept in certain Member States, and the establishment of protection and surveillance zones by those Member States in accordance with Council Directive 2005/94/EC (4). (2) Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/47 provides that the protection and surveillance zones established by the Member States listed in the Annex to that Implementing Decision, in accordance with Directive 2005/94/EC, are to comprise at least the areas listed as protection and surveillance zones in that Annex. (3) The Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/47 was recently amended by Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/661 (5), following outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H5N8 in poultry in Hungary that needed to be reflected in that Annex.