DOCSLIB.ORG

Fifth Report Submitted by Hungary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fifth Report Submitted by Hungary ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES ACFC/SR/V(2019)005 Fifth Report submitted by Hungary Pursuant to Article 25, paragraph 2 of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities – received on 5 February 2019 ACFC/SR/V(2019)005 Prime Minister’s Office HUNGARY’S FIFTH REPORT on the execution of the Framework Convention of the Council of Europe for the Protection of National Minorities Budapest, January 2019 ACFC/SR/V(2019)005 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 5 I. STEPS RELATED TO THE VISIBILITY OF THE RESULTS OF THE FOURTH- CYCLE MONITORING ASSESSMENT, AND PRACTICAL MEASURES FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ................ 10 Representation of nationalities ................................................................................................. 10 Measures for awareness of the Framework Convention’s documents ..................................... 14 Involvement of nationalities in the formulation of the government’s policies ......................... 16 Seventh periodic report and results of the Language Charter ................................................. 22 II. MEASURES FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS RELATED TO SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES ........................................................................................................................... 23 General responses to the recommendations ............................................................................. 23 Changes in the legal regulations applicable to nationalities ................................................... 23 Fight against racism, hate crimes and hate speech ................................................................. 25 Measures aimed at equal treatment and equal opportunities .................................................. 27 Measures for the social inclusion of Roma people .................................................................. 30 Roma integration programs in education; special schools ...................................................... 35 III. DETAILED PRESENTATION OF THE MEASURES TAKEN TO IMPROVE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ................ 42 Article 1 .................................................................................................................................... 42 Article 2 .................................................................................................................................... 42 Article 3 .................................................................................................................................... 43 Article 4 .................................................................................................................................... 44 Article 5 .................................................................................................................................... 49 Article 6 .................................................................................................................................... 54 Article 7 .................................................................................................................................... 55 Article 8 .................................................................................................................................... 56 Article 9 .................................................................................................................................... 59 Article 10 .................................................................................................................................. 62 Article 11 .................................................................................................................................. 63 3 ACFC/SR/V(2019)005 Article 12 .................................................................................................................................. 64 Article 13 .................................................................................................................................. 70 Article 14 .................................................................................................................................. 70 Article 15 .................................................................................................................................. 71 Article 16 .................................................................................................................................. 75 Article 17 .................................................................................................................................. 76 Article 18 .................................................................................................................................. 79 Article 19 .................................................................................................................................. 81 Articles 20 – 23: ....................................................................................................................... 81 Article 30 .................................................................................................................................. 81 IV. ANSWERS TO THE SPECIAL QUESTIONS ARISING FROM PECULIAR NATIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES ............................................................................... 81 ANNEX .................................................................................................................................... 82 1. Nationality programs of the public media on TV and radio ................................................ 82 2. Nationality support available under the Child and Youth Basic Program .......................... 84 4 ACFC/SR/V(2019)005 INTRODUCTION Hungary was one of the first countries to sign the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities (hereinafter: Framework Convention). Its instrument of ratification was deposited on 25 September 1995. The Framework Convention was ratified by the National Assembly of the Republic of Hungary (hereinafter: National Assembly) in Resolution 81/1995 (6 July), and promulgated in Act XXXIV of 1999. Hungary’s country reports on the legislative practices aimed at the implementation of the principles defined in the Framework Convention as well as on the measures taken in the interest of the country’s national and ethnic minorities have been presented to the Council of Europe (hereinafter: CoE) on four occasions, in 1999, 2004, 2009, and 2015. The Advisory Committee to the CoE on the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities (hereinafter: Advisory Committee) reviewed the implementation of the Framework Convention between 7 and 11 December 2015 in Hungary. In document ACFC/OP/IV(2016)003 accepted in 2016, the Advisory Committee summarised its expert opinion about Hungary’s minority policy based on the fourth country report and the on-site monitoring (hereinafter: the Advisory Committee’s opinion). Having reviewed the Advisory Committee’s opinion and the additional remarks made by the Government of Hungary, the CoE’s Committee of Ministers (hereinafter: Committee of Ministers) formulated its position on the implementation of the Framework Convention in Hungary in resolution no. CM/ResCMN(2017)5 (hereinafter: resolution of the Committee of Ministers) dated 5 July 2017, and made its recommendations concerning the issues covered. This fifth country report on the status of the implementation in Hungary of the obligations defined in the Framework Convention (hereinafter: country report) covers the events related to Hungary’s nationality policy between 1 February 2014 and 1 February 2018 (hereinafter: reporting period). The country report has been compiled based on the Advisory Committee’s guideline provided in the letter DGAD/ML/mes, dated 5 July 2018 (hereinafter: Advisory Committee’s guideline). It describes the work performed during the reporting period by the ministries involved in the realisation of the Government’s nationality policy for the implementation of the Framework Convention. In compliance with the Advisory Committee’s guideline, the views of the following stakeholders were sought during the compilation of the country report: domestic self- governments of the national and ethnic minorities subject to Act CLXXIX of 2011 on the rights of nationalities (hereinafter: Nationalities Act; these minorities hereinafter, pursuant to the terminology used in Hungary: nationalities); and, as a new legal institution introduced in the reporting period, minority advocates. For the most comprehensive documentation of the country report, further non-governmental and civil organisations were contacted as well. Data concerning the obligations assumed in the Framework Convection was requested and received from the following parties: the Government’s ministries and state secretariats, and the competent specialised entities; the media authority; 5 ACFC/SR/V(2019)005 the minority advocates; the self-governments of nationalities in Hungary; nationalities’ and related civil organisations and institutions; the Equal Treatment Authority; the Institute for Minority Studies of the Centre for Social Sciences of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences; and the Central Statistical Office. As an important source, we have also utilised those
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Generated an Epistemological Knowledge of the Nation—Quantifying And
    H-Nationalism The “Majority Question” in Interwar Romania: Making Majorities from Minorities in a Heterogeneous State Discussion published by Emmanuel Dalle Mulle on Wednesday, April 22, 2020 H-Nationalism is proud to publish here the sixth post of its “Minorities in Contemporary and Historical Perspectives” series, which looks at majority- minority relations from a multi-disciplinary and diachronic angle. Today’s contribution, by R. Chris Davis (Lone Star College–Kingwood), examines the efforts of Romanian nation-builders to make Romanians during the interwar period. Heterogeneity in Interwar Romania While the situation of ethnic minorities in Romania has been examined extensively within the scholarship on the interwar period, far too little consideration is given into the making of the Romanian ethnic majority itself. My reframing of the “minority question” into its corollary, the “majority question,” in this blogpost draws on my recently published book examining the contested identity of the Moldavian Csangos, an ethnically fluid community of Romanian- and Hungarian-speaking Roman Catholics in eastern Romania.[1] While investigating this case study of a putative ethnic, linguistic, and religious minority, I was constantly reminded that not only minorities but also majorities are socially constructed, crafted from regional, religious, and linguistic bodies and identities. Transylvanians, Bessarabians, and Bănățeni (people from the Banat region) and Regațeni (inhabitants of Romania’s Old Kingdom), for example, were rendered into something
    [Show full text]
  • CULTURAL HERITAGE in MIGRATION Published Within the Project Cultural Heritage in Migration
    CULTURAL HERITAGE IN MIGRATION Published within the project Cultural Heritage in Migration. Models of Consolidation and Institutionalization of the Bulgarian Communities Abroad funded by the Bulgarian National Science Fund © Nikolai Vukov, Lina Gergova, Tanya Matanova, Yana Gergova, editors, 2017 © Institute of Ethnology and Folklore Studies with Ethnographic Museum – BAS, 2017 © Paradigma Publishing House, 2017 ISBN 978-954-326-332-5 BULGARIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES INSTITUTE OF ETHNOLOGY AND FOLKLORE STUDIES WITH ETHNOGRAPHIC MUSEUM CULTURAL HERITAGE IN MIGRATION Edited by Nikolai Vukov, Lina Gergova Tanya Matanova, Yana Gergova Paradigma Sofia • 2017 CONTENTS EDITORIAL............................................................................................................................9 PART I: CULTURAL HERITAGE AS A PROCESS DISPLACEMENT – REPLACEMENT. REAL AND INTERNALIZED GEOGRAPHY IN THE PSYCHOLOGY OF MIGRATION............................................21 Slobodan Dan Paich THE RUSSIAN-LIPOVANS IN ITALY: PRESERVING CULTURAL AND RELIGIOUS HERITAGE IN MIGRATION.............................................................41 Nina Vlaskina CLASS AND RELIGION IN THE SHAPING OF TRADITION AMONG THE ISTANBUL-BASED ORTHODOX BULGARIANS...............................55 Magdalena Elchinova REPRESENTATIONS OF ‘COMPATRIOTISM’. THE SLOVAK DIASPORA POLITICS AS A TOOL FOR BUILDING AND CULTIVATING DIASPORA.............72 Natália Blahová FOLKLORE AS HERITAGE: THE EXPERIENCE OF BULGARIANS IN HUNGARY.......................................................................................................................88
    [Show full text]
  • Individual Regional Baseline Report on Low Carbon Investments Funding – Southern Great Plain Region
    CAPACITY BUILDING WORKSHOP BUDAPEST, 29 October, 2019 Individual Regional Baseline Report on Low Carbon Investments Funding – Southern Great Plain Region PROSPECT2030 | AACM Central Europe | Károly Oelberg INVESTMENTS FUNDING PP8 – SOUTHERN GREAT PLAIN Introduction Types of Funding Decentralised Other EU Funding in initiatives Hungary – Operational Programmes Joint EU/IFI National Cooperation with initiatives initiatives private stakeholders TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 2 INVESTMENTS FUNDING PP8 – SOUTHERN GREAT PLAIN Types of investments funding 1. Decentralised funds made available from the ESI Funds 2. EU low-carbon initiatives 3. EU low-carbon initiatives in collaboration with IFIs 4. National funding schemes 5. Cooperation with private stakeholders TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 3 INVESTMENTS FUNDING PP8 – SOUTHERN GREAT PLAIN Decentralised EU funds in Hungary Total budget: 29 730 million EUR Total EU fund: 25 013 million EUR Relevant OP budget: 16 569 million EUR Relevant OP EU funding: 14 341 million EUR Relevant PA budget: 2 744 million EUR Relevant PA EU funding: 2 389 million EUR TAKING COOPERATION FORWARD 4 INVESTMENTS FUNDING PP8 – SOUTHERN GREAT PLAIN Economic Development and Innovation OP PRIORITY AXES: ▪ Priority axis 1: Increasing the competitiveness and productivity of SMEs ▪ Priority axis 2: Research, technological development and innovation ▪ Priority axis 3: Info-communication developments ▪ Priority axis 4: Energy ▪ Priority axis 5: Employment ▪ Priority axis 6: Competitive labour force ▪ Priority axis 7: Tourism ▪ Priority
    [Show full text]
  • Budapest and Central Danube Region
    Touristic areas of the Budapest and Central Danube Region www.hungary.com Talent for entertaining Forest Tourinform Office Etyek-Buda wine region Residence Kunság wine region Castle National Park Castle ruin Region’s border Museum Highway Thermal/wellness bath Railway Airport Ferry World Heritage Budapest – Central Danube Region “Why Budapest and its surrounding area?” This is the obvious question holiday makers will ask when planning their travels, and we hope to provide the answer. Budapest, Heroes’ Square Budapest because: • it is the cultural, political and transportation centre of Hungary; • it is built on both side of the Danube, the great European river that is registered as a World Heritage panorama; • nature is safeguarded in two national parks and a number of environmental protection areas; • it has represented a “multicultural Europe” for centuries – over 200 nearby villages are populated by Hungarians, Serbs, Slovaks and Germans (Swabians); • it has a strong artistic and cultural heritage; • there’s always something happening: festivals, concerts, theatre perform- ances, sports competitions, exhibitions, church events, wine celebrations or handicraft fairs; • there are many outdoor activities to enjoy: trekking, rock climbing, biking, horse riding, golf, rowing, swimming, potholing or fl ying; • its restaurants offer not only Hungarian cuisine – and wine and palinka – but food from all over the world. Don’t hesitate – come to Budapest, the centre of things! Széchenyi Thermal Baths (We have marked our suggested “must-see” destinations with ***. However, these are naturally subjective selections, and we hope that our guests will fi nd their own three-star experiences.) MT ZRT www.itthon.hu Visegrád Castle Games 1 Budapest – Central Danube Region Budapest Buda Castle and Chain Bridge When you arrive in Budapest, head to the centre and drink in the view of the city’s two parts, divided by the Danube and linked by the bridges that cross it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shaping of Bulgarian and Serbian National Identities, 1800S-1900S
    The Shaping of Bulgarian and Serbian National Identities, 1800s-1900s February 2003 Katrin Bozeva-Abazi Department of History McGill University, Montreal A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 1 Contents 1. Abstract/Resume 3 2. Note on Transliteration and Spelling of Names 6 3. Acknowledgments 7 4. Introduction 8 How "popular" nationalism was created 5. Chapter One 33 Peasants and intellectuals, 1830-1914 6. Chapter Two 78 The invention of the modern Balkan state: Serbia and Bulgaria, 1830-1914 7. Chapter Three 126 The Church and national indoctrination 8. Chapter Four 171 The national army 8. Chapter Five 219 Education and national indoctrination 9. Conclusions 264 10. Bibliography 273 Abstract The nation-state is now the dominant form of sovereign statehood, however, a century and a half ago the political map of Europe comprised only a handful of sovereign states, very few of them nations in the modern sense. Balkan historiography often tends to minimize the complexity of nation-building, either by referring to the national community as to a monolithic and homogenous unit, or simply by neglecting different social groups whose consciousness varied depending on region, gender and generation. Further, Bulgarian and Serbian historiography pay far more attention to the problem of "how" and "why" certain events have happened than to the emergence of national consciousness of the Balkan peoples as a complex and durable process of mental evolution. This dissertation on the concept of nationality in which most Bulgarians and Serbs were educated and socialized examines how the modern idea of nationhood was disseminated among the ordinary people and it presents the complicated process of national indoctrination carried out by various state institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Nationalism and Ethnic Conflict
    Nationalism and Ethnic Conflict Threats to European Security Stockholm International Peace Research Institute SIPRI is an independent institute for research into problems of peace and conflict, especially those of arms control and disarmament. It was established in 1966 to commemorate Sweden’s 150 years of unbroken peace. The Institute is financed mainly by the Swedish Parliament. The staff, the Governing Board and the Scientific Council are international. The Governing Board and the Scientific Council are not responsible for the views expressed in the publications of the Institute. Governing Board Professor Daniel Tarschys, MP, Chairman (Sweden) Sir Brian Urquhart, Vice Chairman (United Kingdom) Professor Catherine Kelleher (United States) Dr Oscar Arias Sánchez (Costa Rica) Dr Gyula Horn (Hungary) Dr Lothar Rühl (Germany) The Director Director Dr Adam Daniel Rotfeld (Poland) Stockholm International Peace Research Institute Pipers väg 28, S-170 73 Solna, Sweden Cable: SIPRI Telephone: 46 8/655 97 00 Telefax: 46 8/655 97 33 Nationalism and Ethnic Conflict Threats to European Security SIPRI Research Report No. 5 Stephen Iwan Griffiths OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS 1993 Oxford University Press, Walton Street, Oxford OX2 6DP Oxford New York Toronto Delhi Bombay Calcutta Madras Karachi Kuala Lumpur Singapore Hong Kong Tokyo Nairobi Dar es Salaam Cape Town Melbourne Auckland Madrid and associated companies in Berlin Ibadan Oxford is a trade mark of Oxford University Press Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York © SIPRI 1993 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press.
    [Show full text]
  • Kalocsa Város Településfejlesztési Koncepciója – MEGALAPOZÓ VIZSGÁLAT ÉS CÉLFA
    VÁROSÉPÍTÉSI TANÁCSADÓ ÉS TERVEZŐ IRODA KFT. KALOCSA VÁROS TELEPÜLÉSFEJLESZTÉSI KONCEPCIÓJA MEGALAPOZÓ VIZSGÁLAT ÉS CÉLFA ÉRSEKI PALOTA 2016. DECEMBER HÓNAP VÁROSÉPÍTÉSI TANÁCSADÓ ÉS TERVEZŐ IRODA KORLÁTOLT FELELŐSSÉGŰ TÁRSASÁG SZÉKHELY: 1085 BUDAPEST, JÓZSEF KÖRÚT 29. • TELEFON: (36 1) 413-0959 • HONLAP: HTTP:// VATIKFT.HU/ TARTALOMJEGYZÉK HELYZETFELTÁRÓ, HELYZETELEMZŐ MUNKARÉSZ 1.1. Településhálózati összefüggések, a település helye a településhálózatban, térségi kapcsolatok ... 6 1.2. A területfejlesztési dokumentumokkal való összefüggések vizsgálata .......................................... 10 1.2.1. Európa 2020 stratégia ............................................................................................................. 10 1.2.2. Az Európai Unió 2014-2020-ra vonatkozó tematikus céljai .................................................... 11 1.2.3. Nemzeti Fejlesztés 2030 – Országos Fejlesztési és Területfejlesztési Koncepció ................... 12 1.2.4. Terület- és településfejlesztési Operatív Program (TOP) ........................................................ 15 1.2.5. Partnerségi Megállapodás ....................................................................................................... 16 1.2.6. Ágazati stratégiák .................................................................................................................... 16 1.2.7. Bács-Kiskun Megye Területfejlesztési Koncepciója 2014-2030 ............................................... 18 1.2.8. Bács-Kiskun Megye Területfejlesztési Programja ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pictures Speak for Inclusion INFO-PACK Youth Exchange Szentendre, Hungary Objectives
    Pictures Speak for Inclusion INFO-PACK Youth Exchange Szentendre, Hungary Objectives Through this project, we want to contribute to reducing the level of social exclusion, stereotyping and discrimination, using photography and promotion of European values. With this in mind, we set the following objectives: 1. A better understanding of the European values. 2. Develop young people photographic skills. 3. Increase awareness about the effects of social exclusion. 4. Hold a Photography Exhibition with social impact in Szentendre. Partners • the bettermaking Ifjúsági Alapítvány – Hungary • Udruzenje Kibitz Kolektiv – Serbia • Be the Change NGO – Italy • Sosyal Inovasyon ve Girisimcilik Dernegi – Turkey • Euroactive NGO – Romania • Association “MOGA” – Bulgaria Youth Exchange • Period: 08.07.2021 - 19.07.2021 (including travel days) • Participants: 1 group leader + 5 participants (minimum 2 of them with fewer opportunities) • Place: Szentendre, Hungary Participants’ profile Participants: Group leaders: • 18 - 25 years old; • No age limit; • Are motivated to participate in this youth exchange • Have interpersonal and communication skills, team and are interested in the proposed topic; spirit, strategic thinking oriented to results; • Presents knowledge / interest forphotography; • Promote a positive attitude at the group level; • Presents desire for civic involvement; • Have coordination, planning and organization skills; • Assume that they will share with others the • Have an advanced level of English; knowledge, attitudes and abilities learned, and that • Have experience in volunteering, non-formal they will be actively involved in all stages of the education and youth; project. • Have competences to evaluate the learning process of young people; What fewer opportunities are? • Economic difficulties: young people with low levels of living, low income, socially dependent, long term unemployed, homeless people, young people with debt or serious financial problems, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • 33 Hungarian Histories
    Miklós M. Molnár 33 HUNGARIAN HISTORIES HUNGARIAN IDENTITY THROUGH PORTRAITS www.CatchBudapest.com Table of Contents Preface ........................................................................................ 5 How to Read this Book (Preface by the Author) ............................. 6 In Search of Roots ....................................................................... 8 Attila the Hun, Our Hun ............................................................................. 9 Chief Árpád, The Founding Father ............................................................ 13 Sándor Kőrösi-Csoma, Seeking Hungarian roots, founding Tibetology .... 16 Ármin Vámbéry, The Dervish in Disguise ................................................. 19 Nation Builders ......................................................................... 23 Mátyás, The King in Disguise ................................................................... 24 István Széchenyi, The Greatest of the Magyars ........................................ 28 Albert Apponyi, The Architect of Trianon ................................................ 32 Mihály Károlyi, The Red Count ................................................................ 36 Anna Kéthly, A Friend of Social Justice, a Thorn in the Side of Politicians ................................................................................................. 40 László Rajk, The Man who was Buried Three Times ................................ 43 Voices .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mind the Uppercase Letters
    The interactive gazetteer of a 150-year-old-globe Zsuzsanna Ungvári*, Tibor Tokai** * PhD Student at Eötvös Loránd University (ELTE), Department of Cartog- raphy and Geoinformatics, [email protected] ** MSc Student, [email protected] Abstract. A 150-year-old-globe was digitized with the method developed in the Virtual Globes Museum. The aim of the digital restoration of the manuscript globe project was to save its content from further decay. The compilation of the place name gazetteer of the globe belonged to the resto- ration work. The interactive gazetteer serves a good example of how to cre- ate a database and visualize various geographical names. Keywords: interactive gazetteer, virtual globe, Google Earth 1. Introduction This work was a part of a project to digitize a 150-year-old manuscript globe and to re-draw it for saving it from further decay. The 132 cm diameter globe was created by László Perczel in a village in Hungary in 1862. It be- came internationally recognized when it won a medal at the third Interna- tional Geographic Congress in Venice, 1881. This manuscript globe is cur- rently owned by the Hungarian National Széchényi Library. The project of the Department of Cartography and Geoinformatics at Eötvös Loránd Uni- versity is going on within the framework of the Virtual Globes Museum (VGM 2013), but now our digital reconstruction project of the one of the largest globes in Central Europe is going to reach the end. A highlight part of the project was saving the names to the posterity. It was not easy work, because the globe surface is badly damaged.
    [Show full text]
  • English Selection 2018
    ISSN 2409-2274 NATIONAL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY HIGHER SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS ENGLISH SELECTION 2018 CONTENTS HERBERT SPENCER: THE UNRECOGNIZED FATHER OF THE THEORY OF DEMOGRAPHIC TRANSITION ANATOLY VISHNEVSKY RETHINKING THE CONTEMPORARY HISTORY OF FERTILITY: FAMILY, STATE, AND THE WORLD SYSTEM MIKHAIL KLUPT GENERATIONAL ACCOUNTS AND DEMOGRAPHIC DIVIDEND IN RUSSIA MIKHAIL DENISENKO, VLADIMIR KOZLOV CITIES OF OVER A MILLION PEOPLE ON THE MORTALITY MAP OF RUSSIA ALEKSEI SHCHUR ARMENIANS OF RUSSIA: GEO-DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS OF THE PAST, MODERN REALITIES AND PROSPECTS SERGEI SUSHCHIY AN EVALUATION OF THE PREVALENCE OF MALIGNANT NEOPLASMS IN RUSSIA USING INCIDENCE-MORTALITY MODEL RUSTAM TURSUN-ZADE • DEMOGRAPHIC REVIEW • EDITORIAL BOARD: INTERNATIONAL EDITORIAL COUNCIL: E. ANDREEV V. MUKOMEL B. ANDERSON (USA) T. MALEVA M. DENISSENKO L. OVCHAROVA O. GAGAUZ (Moldova) F. MESLÉ (France) V. ELIZAROV P. POLIAN I. ELISEEVA B. MIRONOV S. IVANOV A. PYANKOVA Z. ZAYONCHKOVSKAYA S. NIKITINA A. IVANOVA M. SAVOSKUL N. ZUBAREVICH Z. PAVLIK (Czech Republic) I. KALABIKHINA S. TIMONIN V. IONTSEV V. STANKUNIENE (Lithuania) M. KLUPT A. TREIVISCH E. LIBANOVA (Ukraine) M. TOLTS (Israel) A. MIKHEYEVA A. VISHNEVSKY M. LIVI BACCI (Italy) V. SHKOLNIKOV (Germany) N. MKRTCHYAN V. VLASOV T. MAKSIMOVA S. SCHERBOV (Austria) S. ZAKHAROV EDITORIAL OFFICE: Editor-in-Chief - Anatoly G. VISHNEVSKY Deputy Editor-in-Chief - Sergey A. TIMONIN Deputy Editor-in-Chief - Nikita V. MKRTCHYAN Managing Editor – Anastasia I. PYANKOVA Proofreader - Natalia S. ZHULEVA Design and Making-up - Kirill V. RESHETNIKOV English translation – Christopher SCHMICH The journal is registered on October 13, 2016 in the Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technology, and Mass Media. Certificate of Mass Media Registration ЭЛ № ФС77-67362.
    [Show full text]
  • PROFECY – Processes, Features and Cycles of Inner Peripheries in Europe
    PROFECY – Processes, Features and Cycles of Inner Peripheries in Europe (Inner Peripheries: National territories facing challenges of access to basic services of general interest) Applied Research Final Report Annex 12 Case Study Report Tamási járás (Hungary) Version 07/12/2017 This report is one of the deliverables of the PROFECY project. This Applied Research Project is conducted within the framework of the ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme, partly financed by the European Regional Development Fund. The ESPON EGTC is the Single Beneficiary of the ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme. The Single Operation within the programme is implemented by the ESPON EGTC and co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund, the EU Member States and the Partner States, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland. This delivery does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the members of the ESPON 2020 Monitoring Committee. Authors Katalin Kovács, Gergely Tagai, MTA KRTK (Hungary) Krisztina Magócs, Lechner Knowledge Center (Hungary) Advisory Group Project Support Team: Barbara Acreman and Zaira Piazza (Italy), Eedi Sepp (Estonia), Zsolt Szokolai, European Commission. ESPON EGTC: Marjan van Herwijnen (Project Expert), Laurent Frideres (HoU E&O), Ilona Raugze (Director), Piera Petruzzi (Outreach), Johannes Kiersch (Financial Expert). Acknowledgements Annamária Uzzoli, MTA KRTK (Hungary), Anna Hamar, MTA KRTK (Hungary) Information on ESPON and its projects can be found on www.espon.eu. The web site provides the possibility to download and examine the most recent documents produced by finalised and ongoing ESPON projects. This delivery exists only in an electronic version. © ESPON, 2017 Printing, reproduction or quotation is authorised provided the source is acknowledged and a copy is forwarded to the ESPON EGTC in Luxembourg.
    [Show full text]