DOCSLIB.ORG

Conference Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

AATSEEL 2000: Washington, DC Conference Program Non-Panel Events Time: December 27, 2:00–5:00 p.m. Event: Executive Council Meeting Time: December 27, 3:00–9:00 p.m. Event: Exhibitor Setup (Exhibitors Only) Time: December 27, 4:00–8:00 p.m. Event: Conference Registration Time: December 27, 5:00–7:00 p.m. Event: Program Committee Meeting Time: December 27, 7:00–9:00 p.m. Event: AWSS Interviewing Workshop (Open to the Public, Preregistration Not Required) Time: December 28, 7:30 a.m.–7:00 p.m. Event: Conference Registration Time: December 28, 9:00 a.m.–4:30 p.m. Event: Exhibits Open Time: December 28, 5:00–7:00 p.m. Event: ACTR Board Meeting Time: December 28, 7:00–9:00 p.m. Event: Reception for Friends of the Middlebury and Norwich Russian Schools Time: December 28, 7:00–9:00 p.m. Event: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill Reception Time: December 28, 7:30–8:30 p.m. Event: Committee on College and Pre-College Russian (CCPCR) Meeting Time: December 28, 9:00 p.m. Event: AATSEEL President’s Reception and Awards Recognitions, with entertainment by the Luther College Balalaika Ensemble (Laurie Iudin-Nelson, Director) Time: December 29, 7:30 a.m.–7:00 p.m. Event: Conference Registration Time: December 29, 8:00 a.m.–10:00 a.m. Event: Slava/Olympiada Breakfast for Pre-College Teachers of Russian Time: December 29, 9:00 a.m.–4:30 p.m. Event: Exhibits Open Time: December 29,10:15 a.m.–10:45 a.m. Event: AATSEEL Business Meeting and General Session Time: December 29, 10:45 a.m.–12:00 p.m. Event: Vision 20/20 Time: December 29, 4:00–7:00 p.m. Event: Indiana University Reception Time: December 29, 5:15–6:30 p.m. Event: ACTR General Membership Meeting Time: December 29, 7:00–11:00 p.m. Event: ACTR Twenty-Fifth-Anniversary Reception Time: December 30, 7:00–10:00 a.m. Event: Executive Council Meeting Time: December 30, 9:00 a.m.–1:00 p.m. Event: Exhibits Open Time: December 30, 12:00–1:00 p.m. Event: Program Committee Meeting Time: December 30, 1:30–2:30 p.m. Event: Silent Book Auction Panels Time: 28A Panel: 28A-1: Philosophy and Russian Modernism Chair: Jane Gary Harris, University of Pittsburgh Equipment: Overhead projector Slot: December 28, 2000, 8:00–10:00 a.m. From the “Blossoming Heart” to the “Rose of the World.” Daniil Andreev and Russian Symbolism Alexei Bogdanov, University of Colorado Daniil Andreev’s recently discovered visionary writings require a thorough examination in the light of the occult tradition in literature and philosophy. The works of Russian symbolists, whom Andreev called “my teachers and my ancient and stainless love,” provide an important link between the author of “The Rose of the World” and earlier sources of his knowledge and inspiration, both Western (Pythagoreans, Gnostics, Neoplatonists, Dante, Swedenborg, Blake, Romanticists, and Vladimir Solov′ev, among others) and Eastern (particularly Hindu and Buddhist). “Frighteningly, to a shudder, Andrej Belyj’s ‘heart is blossoming,’” Aleksandr Blok wrote in 1902. Blok was extolling Belyj’s emerging theory of symbolism as a “renewal of the oppressive Kantian epistemology.” Belyj’s goal was to reconcile the practice of symbolist poetry as spontaneous mystical creation with a conceptual system that would establish symbolism as an elaborate contemporary theory of cognition. In this paper, I argue that Andreev’s account and analysis of his mystical experiences related to artistic expression—his “metacriticism”—serves the same purpose and further develops the conceptual framework of symbolism as visionary art. For example, Belyj employed Solov′ev’s teaching of universal love, with its emphasis on the spiritual meaning of Sophia (the Divine Wisdom, the World Soul—a notion that originated in Ancient Greece and was later embraced by Christianity, especially by Byzantine and Russian Orthodoxy), in his interpretation of Blok’s poetic visions of the Beautiful Lady. Andreev, an admirer of Solov′ev, even acknowledges the Eternal Feminine as one of the three persons comprising the Trinity, but he claims to be able to identify the actual object of Blok’s vision more accurately—as Navna, “the Ideal Collective Soul of the Russian metaculture.” For Belyj, Blok was a true visionary whose poetic revelations of unseen worlds provided ample material for anagogic conceptualization. For Andreev, Blok (who had died long before the conception of “The Rose of the World”) meant even more: he was one of his “friends of the heart,” whose assistance in his transphysical (mystical) journeys Andreev compares to the guidance provided to Dante by Virgil. However, Andreev the metacritic does not hesitate to subject Blok to scrutiny, incorporating him and his poetry into a whole panorama of heralds— artists with a special spiritual mission. Andreev’s detailed descriptions of the transphysical planes and events that affect inspired artistic creation supply the kind of evidence that Belyj had been seeking in his anthropological studies under the guidance of Rudolph Steiner. Thus, continuing the occult tradition in literature and philosophy, Andreev adds another interesting dimension to the “profound kind of criticism” attempted by Belyj and other symbolists, his teachers. Cvetaeva's Ethics of Individuality: An Idiosyncratic Adaptation of Nietzsche's Thought Ute Stock, Cambridge University Well acquainted with his work, Cvetaeva saw Nietzsche as a kindred spirit. Yet this view depended on a highly selective, idiosyncratic reading of him. Analyzing Cvetaeva’s essay “Iskusstvo pri svete sovesti ”(“Iskusstvo”), which demonstrates the seminal influence of her ethical thought on her aesthetics, I highlight significant parallels between her thought and that of the younger Nietzsche. However, Cvetaeva’s refusal of Nietzsche’s later rejection of the transcendental—she actively misreads his last letters, signed as “The Crucified,” as an indication of his longing for the metaphysical—is crucial for an understanding of her ethics. Cvetaeva’s description of inspiration as a Dionysian, intoxicating visitation by the elemental, as the bliss of surrendering one’s own subjectivity, recalls Nietzsche’s Birth of Tragedy. Yet, stressing the supernatural source of creative energy, Cvetaeva resembles Nietzsche’s “superstitious” creator, the humble mouthpiece of an otherwordly force. Cvetaeva openly admitted her reluctance to share Nietzsche’s denial of the transcendental. Although she was not a spiritual person, Orthodoxy played a significant part in her self-definition as a Russian poet; she saw religion and morality as inextricably linked. Accepting the need for the existing moral standards, she never undertook a Nietzschean wholesale critique of morality, not even in “Iskusstvo.” Yet the insight into the fleeting nature of truth led her to experiment with provisional, individual ways of moral evaluation. In “Iskusstvo”, Cvetaeva undermined her own argument of an overwhelming creative force, by pointing to the poet’s potential for resistance. Locating a salvational element in art, which evokes Nietzsche’s Apollonian moment in tragedy, she recognized the poet’s responsibility, constrained only by the reader’s freedom of interpretation, which Nietzsche neglected. Extraordinary and isolated, Cvetaeva’s poet and Nietzsche’s sovereign individual are alike; they experience both disdain for others and the need to teach. Nietzsche’s master is distinguished by the wish to explore all aspects of human experience, Cvetaeva’s poet by the desire to transcend it, bridging the empirical and the metaphysical realms. Hence Cvetaeva’s readiness for self-sacrifice, clearly recalling the image of Christ. Unwilling to negate the transcendental, Cvetaeva nevertheless doubted the poet’s ability to access it. Destabilizing the categories of good and evil, the violence of the Revolution and the Civil War had rendered the transcendental unknowable. The concept of truth had become problematic: it could no longer depend on an absolute for justification. Instead of abolishing moral evaluation, Cvetaeva put forward an individual way of judging, strongly reminiscent of Nietzsche’s emphasis on the personal nature of evaluation: judgments needed to remain open to revision in the light of further insights into the truth. Her entire oeuvre constitutes a performance of this ethics of individuality: in its elusive character, it enacts the fleeting nature of truth. Cvetaeva’s emphasis on her own self cannot be disqualified as subjectivism; it demonstrates the multiple nature of individuality, prevents it from becoming a static absolute, and constitutes an overt protest against the subjugation of the individual by claims to universal truth. This acquires a political significance in Cvetaeva’s age of totalitarianism and the cult of the collective: much of Cvetaeva’s work is marked by a political engagement out of ethical necessity. Cvetaeva’s ethics of individuality is not without its difficulties: the relation to the Other remains problematic throughout, and Cvetaeva disregards the need for a passage from an ethics of individuality to an ethics of community. From a Nietzschean viewpoint, her desire for the transcendental prevented her from affirming the indeterminable nature of human existence in this world. However, Cvetaeva’s need for metaphysical certainty stems rather from the conviction that she is ultimately unable to solve ethical problems without it. Despite the contradictions in her ethical thought—respect for the Other and the need for self-affirmation, art for art’s sake and the poet as prophet, desire for and suspicion of the otherworldly—, Cvetaeva must be admired for her readiness to explore these contradictions to their full depth, regardless of the tragic personal cost. Shadows Cast Things: Kržižanovskij and the Epistemological Debate Karen Rosenflanz, Independent Scholar In 1932, Maksim Gor′kij refused to assist Sigizmund Kržižanovskij in his efforts to publish his work. Gor′kij wrote to Kržižanovskij’s friend: “The majority of humanity doesn’t care about philosophy, however it may be expressed … .
Recommended publications
  • Understanding and Measuring Morphological Complexity

    Understanding and Measuring Morphological Complexity

    OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 5/3/2015, SPi Understanding and Measuring Morphological Complexity Edited by MATTHEW BAERMAN, DUNSTAN BROWN, AND GREVILLE G. CORBETT 1 OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 5/3/2015, SPi 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, ox2 6dp, United Kingdom Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries © editorial matter and organization Matthew Baerman, Dunstan Brown, and Greville G. Corbett 2015 © the chapters their several authors 2015 Themoralrightsoftheauthorshavebeenasserted First Edition published in 2015 Impression: 1 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Control Number: 2014947260 ISBN 978–0–19–872376–9 Printed and bound by CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon, cr0 4yy Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and for information only.
  • English and INTRODACTION

    English and INTRODACTION

    CHANGES AND CONTINUITY IN EVERYDAY LIFE IN ALBANIA, BULGARIA AND MACEDONIA 1945-2000 UNDERSTANDING A SHARED PAST LEARNING FOR THE FUTURE 1 This Teacher Resource Book has been published in the framework of the Stability Pact for South East Europe CONTENTS with financial support from the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs. It is available in Albanian, Bulgarian, English and INTRODACTION..............................................3 Macedonian language. POLITICAL LIFE...........................................17 CONSTITUTION.....................................................20 Title: Changes and Continuity in everyday life in Albania, ELECTIONS...........................................................39 Bulgaria and Macedonia POLITICAL PERSONS..............................................50 HUMAN RIGHTS....................................................65 Author’s team: Terms.................................................................91 ALBANIA: Chronology........................................................92 Adrian Papajani, Fatmiroshe Xhemali (coordinators), Agron Nishku, Bedri Kola, Liljana Guga, Marie Brozi. Biographies........................................................96 BULGARIA: Bibliography.......................................................98 Rumyana Kusheva, Milena Platnikova (coordinators), Teaching approches..........................................101 Bistra Stoimenova, Tatyana Tzvetkova,Violeta Stoycheva. ECONOMIC LIFE........................................103 MACEDONIA: CHANGES IN PROPERTY.......................................104
  • EHO93 Layout 1

    EHO93 Layout 1

    ^itajte ne i na internet i tamu sme besplatni skopskoeho.mk br. 93 15.11.2018 BRZOTO KUMSTVO, POPULARNO I NA LOKALNO NIVO Zarem na ulici po tri imiwa }e im Na porane{noto smenat, a dupkite „Vardari{te“ |ubreto i natamu se trupa, a neli isti }e ostanat? treba{e park da bide? Skopje treba da ima nekolku centri, osmisleni na eden sofisticiran na~in Dodeka Naumovski i Smilevski zboruvaat za trotoari gra|anite baraat seriozni proekti 2 VO FOKUSOT Partizanite ne oslobodija od fa{izmot, a nie kako da gi zaboravame Gorda istorija e toa! No, se se}ava li dene{no Skopje dovolno na ovie istoriski migovi? Se oddava li dovolno priznanie na toga{nite borci i ja neguvaat li skopjani taa tradicija i svetla istorija? Na ova treba site da dademe odgovor, i instituciite, i u~ili{tata, i roditelite kopje go odbele`a svoeto oslo- na parada na koja u~estvuvale oslo - Sboduvawe od fa{izmot i oku- bo ditelite. pacijata. Za mnogumina skopjani toa Gorda istorija e toa! No, se se}a va ne ma{e nitu da bide poznato, da ne li dene{no Skopje dovolno na ovie ima{e po nekoe zname na bande ri- istoriski migovi? Se oddava li do- te. Za `al od godina vo godina slav- volno priznanie na toga{nite borci ni ot den i negovata proslava se i ja ~uvaat li skopjani taa tradicija i po ve}e blednee. svetla istorija? Na ova treba site da Inaku, na 13 noemvri 1944-tata si dademe odgovor, i instituciite i go dina, makedonskite partizani po- u~ili{tata i rodi te lite.
  • Blood Ties: Religion, Violence, and the Politics of Nationhood in Ottoman Macedonia, 1878

    Blood Ties: Religion, Violence, and the Politics of Nationhood in Ottoman Macedonia, 1878

    BLOOD TIES BLOOD TIES Religion, Violence, and the Politics of Nationhood in Ottoman Macedonia, 1878–1908 I˙pek Yosmaog˘lu Cornell University Press Ithaca & London Copyright © 2014 by Cornell University All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in a review, this book, or parts thereof, must not be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the publisher. For information, address Cornell University Press, Sage House, 512 East State Street, Ithaca, New York 14850. First published 2014 by Cornell University Press First printing, Cornell Paperbacks, 2014 Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Yosmaog˘lu, I˙pek, author. Blood ties : religion, violence,. and the politics of nationhood in Ottoman Macedonia, 1878–1908 / Ipek K. Yosmaog˘lu. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8014-5226-0 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN 978-0-8014-7924-3 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Macedonia—History—1878–1912. 2. Nationalism—Macedonia—History. 3. Macedonian question. 4. Macedonia—Ethnic relations. 5. Ethnic conflict— Macedonia—History. 6. Political violence—Macedonia—History. I. Title. DR2215.Y67 2013 949.76′01—dc23 2013021661 Cornell University Press strives to use environmentally responsible suppliers and materials to the fullest extent possible in the publishing of its books. Such materials include vegetable-based, low-VOC inks and acid-free papers that are recycled, totally chlorine-free, or partly composed of nonwood fibers. For further information, visit our website at www.cornellpress.cornell.edu. Cloth printing 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Paperback printing 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 To Josh Contents Acknowledgments ix Note on Transliteration xiii Introduction 1 1.
  • 1Daskalov R Tchavdar M Ed En

    1Daskalov R Tchavdar M Ed En

    Entangled Histories of the Balkans Balkan Studies Library Editor-in-Chief Zoran Milutinović, University College London Editorial Board Gordon N. Bardos, Columbia University Alex Drace-Francis, University of Amsterdam Jasna Dragović-Soso, Goldsmiths, University of London Christian Voss, Humboldt University, Berlin Advisory Board Marie-Janine Calic, University of Munich Lenard J. Cohen, Simon Fraser University Radmila Gorup, Columbia University Robert M. Hayden, University of Pittsburgh Robert Hodel, Hamburg University Anna Krasteva, New Bulgarian University Galin Tihanov, Queen Mary, University of London Maria Todorova, University of Illinois Andrew Wachtel, Northwestern University VOLUME 9 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/bsl Entangled Histories of the Balkans Volume One: National Ideologies and Language Policies Edited by Roumen Daskalov and Tchavdar Marinov LEIDEN • BOSTON 2013 Cover Illustration: Top left: Krste Misirkov (1874–1926), philologist and publicist, founder of Macedo- nian national ideology and the Macedonian standard language. Photographer unknown. Top right: Rigas Feraios (1757–1798), Greek political thinker and revolutionary, ideologist of the Greek Enlightenment. Portrait by Andreas Kriezis (1816–1880), Benaki Museum, Athens. Bottom left: Vuk Karadžić (1787–1864), philologist, ethnographer and linguist, reformer of the Serbian language and founder of Serbo-Croatian. 1865, lithography by Josef Kriehuber. Bottom right: Şemseddin Sami Frashëri (1850–1904), Albanian writer and scholar, ideologist of Albanian and of modern Turkish nationalism, with his wife Emine. Photo around 1900, photo- grapher unknown. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Entangled histories of the Balkans / edited by Roumen Daskalov and Tchavdar Marinov. pages cm — (Balkan studies library ; Volume 9) Includes bibliographical references and index.
  • Bakhtin's Romantic Grotesque in Konstantin Vaginov's Novels: Alienation from the Soviet Society and the Pre-Revolutionary Culture's Loss

    Bakhtin's Romantic Grotesque in Konstantin Vaginov's Novels: Alienation from the Soviet Society and the Pre-Revolutionary Culture's Loss

    Bakhtin's Romantic Grotesque In Konstantin Vaginov's Novels: Alienation from the Soviet Society and the Pre-Revolutionary Culture's Loss Item Type text; Electronic Thesis Authors Shamarova, Assem Citation Shamarova, Assem. (2021). Bakhtin's Romantic Grotesque In Konstantin Vaginov's Novels: Alienation from the Soviet Society and the Pre-Revolutionary Culture's Loss (Master's thesis, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA). Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction, presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 27/09/2021 06:57:39 Item License http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/660305 BAKHTIN’S ROMANTIC GROTESQUE IN KONSTANTIN VAGINOV’S NOVELS: ALIENATION FROM THE SOVIET SOCIETY AND THE PRE-REVOLUTIONARY CULTURE’S LOSS by Assem Shamarova ____________________________ Copyright © Assem Shamarova 2021 A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF RUSSIAN AND SLAVIC STUDIES In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2021 22 5/21/21 3 Table of Contents Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………..4 Introduction………………………………………............................................................5 Chapter One. Konstantin Vaginov’s Biography, His Novels, and Bakhtin’s
  • Icelandic -Basque Pidgin

    Icelandic -Basque Pidgin

    Icelandic -Basque pidgin J58E itiNA~IQ,~UAtDE ttJi\iversity ofIllinois) Abstract In this paper i present dn analysts fJ/What fe1iJii,tns ofit trade l~nguage born in the seventeenth cen­ tury as a consequence 0/ Basque fishing trips in Me North Atlantic. Since the data t~at'we have show a linguistic syifiiii in an early stage ofdevelopment and the lan­ gUages in contact are easily identifiable, "whichever characteristics arepr~sent £n the contact language 1 will be traceable to one ofthe initial languages or to unilvifsal tendencies • For this purpose, an analysis ofthe main typological features ofboth Basque and Icelandic is also provided. *' 1. Introduction The only remaining vestige that we have of what appears to have been used as a means of communication between Basque whale hunters and Icelandic traders in the seventeenth century is constituted by a few sentences, together with a word list. The existence of this p'idgin seems to have gone virfually unnoticed. Hancock (1977) does not mention it in his "Repertoire of Pidgin and Creole Languages" although he mentions an extinct Icelandic French Pidgin. My source of information is Nicolaas Deen's Glossaria duo Vasco-lslandica (Ams­ terdam 1937, reprinted in this volume), which' is a commentary and translation of two manuscripts written in Iceland in t4e'seventeenth century. Since the contact sit­ uation was interrupted in the 'first part of the eighteenth century and was of inter­ mittent nature, the contact pidgin probably never developed much further than the stage recorded in the manuscripts. The' first manuscript lacks interest for our pur­ poses since it is just a list of lexical items seemingly elicited from the Basque sailors ,by pointing at different objects and vaguely organized according to semantic fields.
  • The Computation of Prosody 'Oct 0 2 1992

    The Computation of Prosody 'Oct 0 2 1992

    THE COMPUTATION OF PROSODY by William James Idsardi B.A. University of Toronto (1988) Submitted to the Department of Linguistics and Philosophy in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology July 31, 1992 © William James Idsardi 1992 All rights reserved The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute copies of this thesis document in whole or in part. Signature of Author Departn nt of Linguistics and Philosophy July 31, 1992 Certified by - -I.....,,- ,v Morris Halle Institute Professor Thesis Supervisor Accepted by - Wayne O'Neil ARCHIVES Chairman MACHUSUS eDa r t m e n t of Linguistics and Philosophy 'OCT 0 2 1992 LlIrtv..0 2 THE COMPUTATION OF PROSODY by William James Idsardi Submitted to the Department of Linguistics and Philosophy on July 31, 1992 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy ABSTRACT This thesis presents a new theory of metrical representations and computations. This theory emphasizes that the metrical grid is a separate module of the phonology, devoted to the calculation of partitionings of phonological elements. The metrical grid consists of parallel tiers composed of three kinds of elements: grid marks and left and right boundaries. A single boundary serves to define a metrical constituent: a left boundary creates a grouping of the elements to its right, a right boundary creates a grouping of the elements to its left. The calculation of the metrical grid is accomplished through the use of both rules and constraints. This division of labor accounts for observed properties of stress systems in a succinct manner.
  • Ћирилица Из Нот Дед: Cyrillic Script from a Sociolinguistic Perspective in Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia

    Ћирилица Из Нот Дед: Cyrillic Script from a Sociolinguistic Perspective in Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia

    1 Ћирилица из нот дед: Cyrillic Script from a Sociolinguistic Perspective in Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia Aleksandra Salamurović (Jena)1 1. Introduction During 2012 and 2013 the question of script use in Serbia, specifically, the fact that Latin script prevails in public use, moved into the spotlight of public discussion, especially in multicultural Novi Sad (Salamurović 2015). After several months-long debates over scripts used on the building of the Center for Culture in Novi Sad, on bus displays and other public facilities, one creative citizen was obviously motivated to express their revolt by posting the following graffiti: Ћирилица из нот дед (“Cyrillics is not dead”), transcribing parts of English text into Serbian using the Cyrillic alphabet. On the other hand, in his current typological study on biscriptality in Slavic and non-Slavic languages, Slavist Daniel Bunčić proclaims in aphoristic form: “Monoscriptality can be cured - learn Cyrillic!” (Bunčić 2016a:16)2 emphasizing an additional value of learning and using the Cyrillic script. Besides both statements relating to Cyrillic script, they also have the common trait that they assign particular attitudes and values to the script. Those socio-cultural attributions are one of the most important features of the script and are of primary importance in selecting the script within biscriptal situations. Moreover, they are of particular interest for language policy and sociolinguistics of script. This paper will examine the current status of Cyrillic script in three South-Slavic countries: Serbia, Montenegro and Macedonia3, the first two being biscriptal in the sense of what Bunčić typologically describes as bigraphism (one language using two scripts, Bunčić 2016c:54), and the last, Macedonia, being typologically monoscriptal but still dealing with two different scripts.
  • Zbornik Radova Sa Konferencije INTERKULT 2017

    Zbornik Radova Sa Konferencije INTERKULT 2017

    ZBORNIK 12 InterKult 2017 VOLUME 1 VOLUME 1 InterKult 2017 NOVI SAD • 2018 InterKult 2017 VOLUME 1 ZBORNIK 12 InterKult 2017 VOLUME 1 Selected Papers from the Third International Conference Interculturalism in Education Editors: Prof. Dr Laura Spăriosu Assist. Prof. Dr Ivana Ivanić Dr Violeta Petković NOVI SAD, 2018 Published by: Pedagogical Insitute of Vojvodina www.pzv.org.rs University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Philosophy www.ff.uns.ac.rs For publisher: János Puskás, Director Prof. Dr Ivana Živančević-Sekeruš, Dean Editors: Prof. Dr Laura Spăriosu Assist. Prof. Dr Ivana Ivanić Dr Violeta Petković Reviewers of the volume: Prof. Dr Olivera Knežević-Florić, University of Novi Sad, Serbia Prof. Dr Ciprian Vălcan, Tibiscus University of Timișoara, Romania Prof. Dr Ștefan Gencărău, University of Geneva, Switzerland Cover design: Albina Munipova Printed by: Verzal 021, Novi Sad ISBN: 978-86-80707-68-6 (VOLUME 1) The authors are responsible for the authenticity, accuracy and originality of their papers. Scientific Committee: Prof. Dr Ivana Živančević-Sekeruš, University of Novi Sad, Serbia Prof. Dr Ioan-Aurel Pop, Babeș-Bolyai University of Cluj-Napoca, Romania Prof. Dr Otilia Hedeșan, West University of Timișoara, Romania Prof. Dr Sanja Bošković, University of Poiteres, France Prof. Dr Florin-Ioan Cioban, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary Prof. Dr Thede Kal, University of Jena, Germany Prof. Dr Octavia Nedelcu, University of Bucharest, Romania Prof. Dr Enrique Javier Nogueras Valdivieso, University of Granada, Spain Prof. Dr Mihai Spăriosu, University of Georgia, Athens, USA Prof. Dr Daniel-Sorin Vintilă, University of Novi Sad, Serbia Assist. Prof. Dr Codruța-Gabriela Antonesei, Jagiellonian University of Krakow, Poland Assist.
  • Sretenovic Dejan Red Horizon

    Sretenovic Dejan Red Horizon

    Dejan Sretenović RED HORIZON EDITION Red Publications Dejan Sretenović RED HORIZON AVANT-GARDE AND REVOLUTION IN YUGOSLAVIA 1919–1932 kuda.org NOVI SAD, 2020 The Social Revolution in Yugoslavia is the only thing that can bring about the catharsis of our people and of all the immorality of our political liberation. Oh, sacred struggle between the left and the right, on This Day and on the Day of Judgment, I stand on the far left, the very far left. Be‑ cause, only a terrible cry against Nonsense can accelerate the whisper of a new Sense. It was with this paragraph that August Cesarec ended his manifesto ‘Two Orientations’, published in the second issue of the “bimonthly for all cultural problems” Plamen (Zagreb, 1919; 15 issues in total), which he co‑edited with Miroslav Krleža. With a strong dose of revolutionary euphoria and ex‑ pressionistic messianic pathos, the manifesto demonstrated the ideational and political platform of the magazine, founded by the two avant‑garde writers from Zagreb, activists of the left wing of the Social Democratic Party of Croatia, after the October Revolution and the First World War. It was the struggle between the two orientations, the world social revolution led by Bolshevik Russia on the one hand, and the world of bourgeois counter‑revolution led by the Entente Forces on the other, that was for Cesarec pivot‑ al in determining the future of Europe and mankind, and therefore also of the newly founded Kingdom of Serbs, Cro‑ ats and Slovenes (Kingdom of SCS), which had allied itself with the counter‑revolutionary bloc.
  • Aeneas in Baghdad

    Aeneas in Baghdad

    Aeneas in Baghdad The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Thomas, Richard F. 2015. Aeneas in Baghdad. In Virgilian Studies, a Miscellany dedicated to the Memory of Mario Geymonat, ed. H.-C. Günther: 453-73. Nordhausen: Verlag Traugott Bautz. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:30805507 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#OAP Aeneas in Baghdad Richard F. Thomas Harvard University To pick on just one favorite bit of bull, anyone who deplores ‘Two Voices’ criticism of the Aeneid as anachronistic liberal projection of 60s Vietnam Angst is handing out 80s Reagan/Thatcher ‘One Voice’ politics of righteousness: it’s not hard to hear republicanism in G[alinsky]’s appeal to contemporary U.S. analysis of ‘leadership’ as underpinning for his version of Augustus: incarnation of the consensual will of the community spliced with the authority to shape the future of Rome. Henderson 1998: 112–13 We need to strengthen our ties to democratic allies and to challenge regimes hostile to our interests and values. We need to accept responsibility for America’s unique role in preserving and extending an international order friendly to our security, our prosperity, and our principles. From ‘Statement of Principles’ of Project for a New American Century (June 3, 1997), select signatories: Elliott Abrams, William J.