Question for Written Answer

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Question for written answer E-005578/2020 to the Council Rule 138 Julie Lechanteux (ID), Virginie Joron (ID), André Rougé (ID), Jean-Lin Lacapelle (ID), Maximilian Krah (ID), Gilles Lebreton (ID), Gunnar Beck (ID), Herve Juvin (ID), France Jamet (ID) Subject: Navalny case: additional sanctions against Russia On 7 October 2020, the German and French Ministers for Foreign Affairs announced their intention of proposing additional sanctions against Russia to their European partners, stating that 'there is no other plausible explanation' than Russia being responsible for the incident involving the politician Alexei Navalny1, which he himself has described as an attempted poisoning. This explanation harks back to the famous 'highly likely’ statement made in 2018 by the then British Prime Minister, Theresa May. Apparently, the two ministers did not need to wait for the findings of a judicial investigation to assign responsibility (naming defendants), establish guilt (delivering a verdict) and impose sanctions (handing down sentences), in a case that is still far from being definitively solved. Does the Council not take the view that such a decision violates Articles 48 and 51 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, which state that 'everyone who has been charged shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law’ and that 'the provisions of this Charter are addressed to the institutions and bodies of the Union with due regard for the principle of subsidiarity and to the Member States only when they are implementing Union law'? Supporters2 1 https://agenceurope.eu/fr/bulletin/article/12576/39 2 This question is supported by Members other than the authors: Jean-Paul Garraud (ID), Thierry Mariani (ID) PE659.594v01-00.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Green Deal – the Coordinators
Green Deal – The Coordinators David Sassoli S&D ”I want the European Green Deal to become Europe’s hallmark. At the heart of it is our commitment to becoming the world’s first climate-neutral continent. It is also a long-term economic imperative: those who act first European Parliament and fastest will be the ones who grasp the opportunities from the ecological transition. I want Europe to be 1 February 2020 – H1 2024 the front-runner. I want Europe to be the exporter of knowledge, technologies and best practice.” — Ursula von der Leyen Lorenzo Mannelli Klaus Welle President of the European Commission Head of Cabinet Secretary General Chairs and Vice-Chairs Political Group Coordinators EPP S&D EPP S&D Renew ID Europe ENVI Renew Committee on Europe Dan-Ştefan Motreanu César Luena Peter Liese Jytte Guteland Nils Torvalds Silvia Sardone Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator the Environment, Public Health Greens/EFA GUE/NGL Greens/EFA ECR GUE/NGL and Food Safety Pacal Canfin Chair Bas Eickhout Anja Hazekamp Bas Eickhout Alexandr Vondra Silvia Modig Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator S&D S&D EPP S&D Renew ID Europe EPP ITRE Patrizia Toia Lina Gálvez Muñoz Christian Ehler Dan Nica Martina Dlabajová Paolo Borchia Committee on Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Industry, Research Renew ECR Greens/EFA ECR GUE/NGL and Energy Cristian Bușoi Europe Chair Morten Petersen Zdzisław Krasnodębski Ville Niinistö Zdzisław Krasnodębski Marisa Matias Vice-Chair Vice-Chair
[Show full text]
Azerbaijan Debacle: the Pace Debate on 23 January 2013
AZERBAIJAN DEBACLE: THE PACE DEBATE ON 23 JANUARY 2013 Christoph Straesser Pedro Agramunt Berlin 11 February 2013 CAST OF CHARACTERS JEAN-CLAUDE MIGNON, PACE PRESIDENT (FRANCE) ........................................................................................... 5 PEDRO AGRAMUNT (SPAIN) ......................................................................................................................................... 5 CHRISTOPH STRAESSER (GERMANY) .......................................................................................................................... 6 ANNE BRASSEUR (LUXEMBOURG) ............................................................................................................................... 8 ROBERT WALTER (UNITED KINGDOM) ..................................................................................................................... 9 LUCA VOLONTE (ITALY) .............................................................................................................................................. 10 VIOLA VON CRAMON-TAUBADEL (GERMANY) ....................................................................................................... 11 LISE CHRISTOFFERSEN (NORWAY) ........................................................................................................................... 12 JEAN-MARIE BOCKEL (FRANCE) ............................................................................................................................... 13 MARINA SCHUSTER (GERMANY) ..............................................................................................................................
[Show full text]
European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast
Briefing May 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 6 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 5 seats 1 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener Karin Feldinger 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Petra Steger Monika Vana* Stefan Windberger 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath Roman Haider Thomas Waitz* Stefan Zotti 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide Vesna Schuster Olga Voglauer Nini Tsiklauri 6. Wolfram Pirchner Julia Elisabeth Herr Elisabeth Dieringer-Granza Thomas Schobesberger Johannes Margreiter 7. Christian Sagartz Christian Alexander Dax Josef Graf Teresa Reiter 8. Barbara Thaler Stefanie Mösl Maximilian Kurz Isak Schneider 9. Christian Zoll Luca Peter Marco Kaiser Andrea Kerbleder Peter Berry 10. Claudia Wolf-Schöffmann Theresa Muigg Karin Berger Julia Reichenhauser NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. Likely to be elected Unlikely to be elected or *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. and/or take seat to take seat, if elected European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Paul Magnette 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 2. Maria Arena* 2.
[Show full text]
Identitã€ E Democrazia
Identità e Democrazia Da Wikipedia, l'enciclopedia libera. Identità e Democrazia (in inglese: Identity and Identità e Democrazia Democracy, ID) è un gruppo politico del Parlamento Europeo di destra, fondato nel 2019 dopo le elezioni (EN) Identity and Democracy europee del 2019. Il gruppo è il successore del gruppo Presidente Marco Zanni fondato nel 2015 Europa delle Nazioni e della Libertà. (Lega) Vicepresidente Nicolas Bay (RN) Jörg Meuthen Indice (AfD) Storia Stato Unione Obiettivi politici europea Composizione Abbreviazione ID Note Fondazione 13 giugno 2019 Voci correlate Ideologia Nazionalismo Conservatorismo Storia nazionale Populismo di Il 12 giugno 2019 è stato annunciato che il gruppo destra successore a Europa delle Nazioni e delle Libertà si Identitarismo sarebbe chiamato "Identità e Democrazia" e avrebbe Sovranismo incluso partiti come la Lega Nord (Italia), Anti-immigrazione Raggruppamento Nazionale (Francia) e Alternativa per la Collocazione Destra [1] Germania (Germania)[2]. Il leghista Marco Zanni è stato Partito europeo AEPN nominato Presidente[3]. Il 13 giugno 2019 il gruppo, composto da 73 europarlamentari, è stato lanciato a Seggi 73 / 751 Bruxelles da Marine Le Pen[4]. Europarlamento Obiettivi politici I principali obiettivi politici del gruppo sono bloccare una maggiore integrazione europea ed ottenere maggiore autonomia nelle politiche di spesa, ovvero la possibilità di fare maggiore deficit e debito senza incorrere in penalità da parte della Commissione Europea.[5] Composizione Identità e Democrazia è formato da
[Show full text]
Priority Question for Written Answer
Priority question for written answer P-002058/2020 to the Commission Rule 138 Julie Lechanteux (ID), Mathilde Androuët (ID), Jordan Bardella (ID), Aurelia Beigneux (ID), Dominique Bilde (ID), Annika Bruna (ID), Gilbert Collard (ID), Jean-Paul Garraud (ID), Catherine Griset (ID), Jean-François Jalkh (ID), France Jamet (ID), Virginie Joron (ID), Herve Juvin (ID), Jean-Lin Lacapelle (ID), Hélène Laporte (ID), Gilles Lebreton (ID), Thierry Mariani (ID), André Rougé (ID), Nicolas Bay (ID), Maxette Pirbakas (ID) Subject: Legal basis for geo-tracking and the sharing of personal data during the coronavirus outbreak On 24 March 2020, the Commission revealed that it had held talks with telecommunications operators about joining forces to tackle the coronavirus outbreak. Thierry Breton, the Internal Market Commissioner, held a videoconference with the heads of Europe’s telecommunications companies and the GSMA (Global System for Mobile Communications) to explore options for sharing geolocation metadata in order to map and forecast the spread of the virus. The Commission claims that such a move would be fully in line with the General Data Protection Regulation and e-privacy legislation. How does the Commission intend to guarantee EU citizens full anonymisation of their personal data? How exactly does the Commission envisage using such data? Not content with surveillance and quarantine enforcement, Israel and a number of Asian countries have adopted a proactive AI-based approach that alerts individuals if they have been in contact with a virus carrier. How do the Commission’s plans compare, and what logistical support will it provide the Member States which opt for this approach? PE650.848v01-00.
[Show full text]
Parlament Europejski 2019-2024
Parlament Europejski 2019-2024 Komisja Zatrudnienia i Spraw Socjalnych EMPL_PV(2019)0903_1 PROTOKÓŁ Posiedzenie w dniu 3 września 2019 r. w godz. 9.00–12.30 i 15.30–19.30 BRUKSELA Lucia Ďuriš Nicholsonová (przewodnicząca) otworzyła posiedzenie we wtorek 3 września 2019 r. o godz. 9.11. 1. Przyjęcie porządku dziennego Porządek dzienny został przyjęty bez zmian. 2. Komunikaty przewodniczącej Dostępność tłumaczenia ustnego Dostępne było tłumaczenie ustne na wszystkie języki z wyjątkiem chorwackiego, fińskiego, irlandzkiego (gaelickiego) i łotewskiego. 3. Zatwierdzenie protokołów posiedzeń 24 lipca 2019 r. PV – PE639.891v01-00 Protokół został zatwierdzony. 4. Budżet ogólny Unii Europejskiej na rok budżetowy 2020 – wszystkie sekcje EMPL/9/00546 2019/2028(BUD) Sprawozdawczyni komisji opiniodawczej: Lucia Ďuriš Nicholsonová (ECR) PA – PE639.697v01-00 AB – PE640.623v01-00 Przedm. właśc.: BUDG – Monika Hohlmeier (PPE) Eider Gardiazabal Rubial (S&D) Rozpatrzenie projektu opinii Termin składania poprawek: 5 września 2019 r., godz. 12.00 PV\1188023PL.docx PE641.077v01-00 PL Zjednoczona w różnorodności PL Głos zabrali: Lucia Ďuriš Nicholsonová, Tomáš Zdechovský, Alicia Homs Ginel, Yana Toom, Katrin Langensiepen, Sandra Pereira, Brigitte Fellahi (kierownik działu, DG EMPL) Decyzja: Termin składania poprawek: 5 września 2019 r., godz. 12.00 Głosowanie w komisji EMPL: 24 września 2019 r. *** Głosowanie elektroniczne *** 5. Budżet ogólny Unii Europejskiej na rok budżetowy 2020 – wszystkie sekcje EMPL/9/00546 2019/2028(BUD) Sprawozdawczyni komisji opiniodawczej: Lucia Ďuriš Nicholsonová (ECR) Przedm. właśc.: BUDG – Monika Hohlmeier (PPE) Eider Gardiazabal Rubial (S&D) Przyjęcie poprawek budżetowych *** Koniec głosowania elektronicznego *** Decyzja: Komisja EMPL przyjęła 25 z 43 zgłoszonych poprawek do budżetu, w tym 15 dotyczących projektów pilotażowych i działań przygotowawczych (zob.
[Show full text]
Supporting the Single Market Beyond 2020
BRIEFING EU Legislation in Progress 2021-2027 MFF Supporting the single market beyond 2020 OVERVIEW The single market programme is a new, dedicated €3.7 billion (in 2018 prices) or €4.2 billion (in current prices) programme for the 2021-2027 period supporting the single market. It is particularly aimed at empowering and protecting consumers, and enabling Europe's many small and medium- sized enterprises (SMEs) to take better advantage of a well-functioning single market. On 3 May 2021, the Regulation establishing the programme entered into force, with retroactive application from 1 January 2021. The new programme aims to strengthen and streamline the governance of the EU's internal market. It will support the competitiveness of enterprises, and promote human, animal and plant health and a safe food chain, as well as financing European statistics to provide reliable data relevant to the single market. The proposal consolidates and streamlines a wide range of activities that were previously financed separately, and bundles them into one programme. The aim is to create benefits in terms of flexibility, simplification and synergies, and eliminate overlaps. Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the programme for single market, competitiveness of enterprises, including small and medium-sized enterprises, and European statistics and repealing Regulations (EU) No 99/2013, (EU) No 1287/2013, (EU) No 254/2014, (EU) No 258/2014, (EU) No 652/2014 and (EU) 2017/826 Committee responsible: Internal Market and Consumer Protection (IMCO) COM(2018) 441 Rapporteur: Brando Benifei (S&D, Italy) 7.6.2018 Shadow rapporteurs: Arba Kokalari (EPP, Sweden) 2018/0231(COD) Sandro Gozi (Renew, France) Ordinary legislative Virginie Joron (ID, France) procedure (COD) David Cormand (Greens/EFA, France) (Parliament and Eugen Jurzyca (ECR, Slovakia) Council on equal Kateřina Konečná (The Left, Czechia) footing – formerly 'co-decision') Procedure completed.
[Show full text]
A Look at the New European Parliament Page 1 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMITTEE (INTA)
THE NEW EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT KEY COMMITTEE COMPOSITION 31 JULY 2019 INTRODUCTION After several marathon sessions, the European Council agreed on the line-up for the EU “top jobs” on 2 July 2019. The deal, which notably saw German Defence Minister Ursula von der Leyen (CDU, EPP) surprisingly designated as the next European Commission (EC) President, meant that the European Parliament (EP) could proceed with the election of its own leadership on 3 July. The EPP and Renew Europe (formerly ALDE) groups, in line with the agreement, did not present candidates for the EP President. As such, the vote pitted the S&D’s David-Maria Sassoli (IT) against two former Spitzenkandidaten – Ska Keller (DE) of the Greens and Jan Zahradil (CZ) of the ACRE/ECR, alongside placeholder candidate Sira Rego (ES) of GUE. Sassoli was elected President for the first half of the 2019 – 2024 mandate, while the EPP (presumably EPP Spitzenkandidat Manfred Weber) would take the reins from January 2022. The vote was largely seen as a formality and a demonstration of the three largest Groups’ capacity to govern. However, Zahradil received almost 100 votes (more than the total votes of the ECR group), and Keller received almost twice as many votes as there are Greens/EFA MEPs. This forced a second round in which Sassoli was narrowly elected with just 11 more than the necessary simple majority. Close to 12% of MEPs did not cast a ballot. MEPs also elected 14 Vice-Presidents (VPs): Mairead McGuinness (EPP, IE), Pedro Silva Pereira (S&D, PT), Rainer Wieland (EPP, DE), Katarina Barley (S&D, DE), Othmar Karas (EPP, AT), Ewa Kopacz (EPP, PL), Klara Dobrev (S&D, HU), Dita Charanzová (RE, CZ), Nicola Beer (RE, DE), Lívia Járóka (EPP, HU) and Heidi Hautala (Greens/EFA, FI) were elected in the first ballot, while Marcel Kolaja (Greens/EFA, CZ), Dimitrios Papadimoulis (GUE/NGL, EL) and Fabio Massimo Castaldo (NI, IT) needed the second round.
[Show full text]
Rapport DIGIMIND Evolution
Newsletter CNR BEA n°13 Mars 2021 ALIMENTATION ANIMALE – DONT ENRICHISSEMENT ............................................................. 4 15/04/2020 : Horse Feeding and Management ........................................................................................... 4 23/02/2021 : Nutrition, feeding and laying hen welfare ............................................................................. 4 COGNITION-EMOTIONS ............................................................................................................... 5 09/03/2021 : Brain activity reflects (chronic) welfare state: Evidence from individual electroencephalography profiles in an animal model ............................................................................... 5 08/03/2021 : Que savons-nous de l'intelligence animale ? ....................................................................... 7 24/02/2021 : Les animaux parlent, sachons les écouter ........................................................................... 7 19/02/2021 : Interspecific two-dimensional visual discrimination of faces in horses (Equus caballus) ........................................................................................................................................................................ 8 17/02/2021 : Understanding fish cognition: a review and appraisal of current practices ..................... 9 16/02/2021 : Anxiety Behavior in Pigs (Sus scrofa) Decreases Through Affiliation and May Anticipate Threat ........................................................................................................................................
[Show full text]
Question for Oral Answer
Question for oral answer to the Commission Rule 136 Eleonora Evi (Verts/ALE), Günther Sidl (S&D), Sarah Wiener (Verts/ALE), Emil Radev (PPE), Martin Buschmann (NI), Maria Noichl (S&D), Manuela Ripa (Verts/ALE), Niels Fuglsang (S&D), Marina Kaljurand (S&D), Ernest Urtasun (Verts/ALE), Sirpa Pietikäinen (PPE), Aurélia Beigneux (ID), Manuel Bompard (The Left), Annika Bruna (ID), David Cormand (Verts/ALE), Pascal Durand (Renew), Yannick Jadot (Verts/ALE), Virginie Joron (ID), Caroline Roose (Verts/ALE), Marie Toussaint (Verts/ALE), Chrysoula Zacharopoulou (Renew), Clare Daly (The Left), Tiziana Beghin (NI), Rosa D'Amato (Verts/ALE), Petras Auštrevičius (Renew), Tilly Metz (Verts/ALE), Anja Hazekamp (The Left), Leszek Miller (S&D), Sylwia Spurek (Verts/ALE), Jadwiga Wiśniewska (ECR), Francisco Guerreiro (Verts/ALE), Tudor Ciuhodaru (S&D), Vlad Gheorghe (Renew), Malin Björk (The Left), Martin Hojsík (Renew), Michal Wiezik (PPE) Subject: An EU ban on the use of wild animals in circuses Wild animals in circuses are forced to behave in ways never seen in nature and although some of these animals have been bred for tens of generations in captivity, they still perform the behaviour typical of their wild counterparts. The welfare of wild animals in circuses is always severely compromised. Most of Member States consider that the use of wild animals in circuses does not have any educational or cultural value and, on the contrary, may have a negative impact on the public’s perception and respect of wild animals. – indeed 23 have already adopted a total or partial ban on their use. Health controls for the movement of circus animals between Member States should be applied through Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/2035 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/429.
[Show full text]
Russian Soft Power in France: Assessing Moscow's Cultural and Business Para- Diplomacy
Russian Soft Power in France: Assessing Moscow's Cultural and Business Para- diplomacy January 8, 2018 Marlene Laruelle Senior Fellow, Carnegie Council; Research Professor, The George Washington University This paper is the first of a series of publications on Russia's influence in France. France constitutes the most prominent example of Russia's soft power in Western Europe, due not only to the long-lasting positive bilateral relations but also to the presence of an important Russian emigration since the 1920s that can act as a relay of influence. This project is supported by a grant from the Foundation Open Society Institute in cooperation with OSIFE of the Open Society Foundations. The French-Russian relationship is based on a long-standing tradition of cultural exchanges. In the 19th century, France was already one of the preferred destinations for Russian political exiles, and subsequently received several of the major waves of Russian emigration in the interwar period. Under the presidency of de Gaulle, it positioned itself as a European power relatively favorable to the Soviet Union. France's strong Communist tradition also encouraged a certain ideological proximity, and Russian was widely taught at secondary school level until the collapse of the USSR. The bilateral relationship is more complex today, characterized by close- knit economic and cultural interrelationships but also by political difficulties over the main international issues, the most important of which are Ukraine and Syria. Since the support shown by Russia to the European extreme right and the—now waning—honeymoon between the Front National (National Front) and some Kremlin circles, debate in France on the "Russian presence" and "Russia's networks of influence" has escalated, sometimes reaching extreme forms of paranoia founded on gross exaggeration, groundless supposition, and the reproduction of American arguments concerning the rumored Russian hand in electing Donald Trump.
[Show full text]
En En Motion for a Resolution
European Parliament 2019-2024 Plenary sitting B9-0168/2020 10.6.2020 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION pursuant to Rule 143 of the Rules of Procedure on placing the Antifa movement on the EU terrorist list Christine Anderson, Gerolf Annemans, Gunnar Beck, Aurelia Beigneux, Lars Patrick Berg, Dominique Bilde, Markus Buchheit, Jorge Buxadé Villalba, Gilbert Collard, Marcel de Graaff, Filip De Man, Derk Jan Eppink, Nicolaus Fest, Emmanouil Fragkos, Gianna Gancia, Catherine Griset, Roman Haider, Virginie Joron, Maximilian Krah, Joachim Kuhs, Jean-Lin Lacapelle, Gilles Lebreton, Jaak Madison, Thierry Mariani, Jörg Meuthen, Guido Reil, Jérôme Rivière, Rob Rooken, Robert Roos, Hermann Tertsch, Tom Vandendriessche, Harald Vilimsky, Charlie Weimers, Bernhard Zimniok, Milan Zver RE\1207171EN.docx PE647.651v01-00 EN United in diversityEN B9-0168/2020 Motion for a European Parliament resolution on placing the Antifa movement on the EU terrorist list The European Parliament, – having regard to the Council Common Position of 27 December 2001 on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism (2001/931/CFSP)1, ,– having regard to Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/20 of 13 January 2020 updating the list of persons, groups and entities subject to Articles 2, 3 and 4 of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism, and repealing Decision (CFSP) 2019/13412,, – having regard to Rule 143 of its Rules of Procedure, A. whereas a terrorist act is defined in Article 1(3) of the abovementioned Council Common Position; B. whereas Antifa has organised and carried out violent attacks in the United States under the guise of protesting the death of George Floyd; whereas Antifa is known to have incited and committed violence in Europe; whereas the movement has allegedly received training from other terrorist groups in Syria; 1.
[Show full text]