DOCSLIB.ORG

9.6.2020 A9-0112/1 Amendment 1 Thierry Mariani, Jérôme Rivière on Behalf of the ID Group Report A9-0112/2020 Petras Auštrevi

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
9.6.2020 A9-0112/1 Amendment 1 Thierry Mariani, Jérôme Rivière on Behalf of the ID Group Report A9-0112/2020 Petras Auštrevi 9.6.2020 A9-0112/1 Amendment 1 Thierry Mariani, Jérôme Rivière on behalf of the ID Group Report A9-0112/2020 Petras Auštrevičius European Parliament recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on the Eastern Partnership, in the run-up to the June 2020 Summit (2019/2209(INI)) Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point g Proposal for a recommendation Amendment (g) maintain a balanced approach (g) maintain a balanced approach between tailor-made differentiation within between tailor-made differentiation within the EaP and the inclusiveness, coherence the EaP and the inclusiveness, coherence and consistency of the multilateral and consistency of the multilateral framework, which remains a reference framework, which remains a reference point for all EaP countries; avoid splitting point for all EaP countries; avoid splitting the EaP along the lines of the different the EaP along the lines of the different countries’ ambitions towards the EU; countries’ ambitions towards the EU; consider that the scope and depth of consider that the scope and depth of cooperation between the EU and the EaP cooperation between the EU and the EaP countries is to be determined by the countries is to be determined by the ambitions of the parties, as well as by their ambitions of the parties, as well as by their implementation of reforms; acknowledge implementation of reforms; that the AAs/DCFTAs that have been signed with Georgia, the Republic of Moldova and Ukraine are the evidence of a differentiated approach and should lead to further enhanced bilateral relationship formats and roadmaps based on the principle of ‘more for more’; Or. en AM\1207163EN.docx PE647.648v01-00 EN United in diversityEN 9.6.2020 A9-0112/2 Amendment 2 Thierry Mariani, Jérôme Rivière on behalf of the ID Group Report A9-0112/2020 Petras Auštrevičius European Parliament recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on the Eastern Partnership, in the run-up to the June 2020 Summit (2019/2209(INI)) Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point b t Proposal for a recommendation Amendment (b t) take into consideration the calls (b t) take into consideration the fact that made by the Ukrainian Government for the Minsk Agreements have still not been an extended international peacekeeping fulfilled; force to be stationed along the Ukraine- Russia border and in the Luhansk and Donetsk districts; once the situation permits and as part of the full implementation of the Minsk Agreements, an EU-led CSDP mission should be offered for deployment to the parties to the conflict, to assist in tasks such as demining, preparations for local elections and securing free access for humanitarian aid organisations; Or. en AM\1207163EN.docx PE647.648v01-00 EN United in diversityEN 9.6.2020 A9-0112/3 Amendment 3 Thierry Mariani, Jérôme Rivière on behalf of the ID Group Report A9-0112/2020 Petras Auštrevičius European Parliament recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on the Eastern Partnership, in the run-up to the June 2020 Summit (2019/2209(INI)) Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point h Proposal for a recommendation Amendment (h) in light of a tailor-made approach, deleted consider creating for the three associated countries an enhanced cooperation strategy, which could establish a reform and investment support programme in areas such as capacity building, transport, infrastructure, connectivity, energy, justice and the digital economy, which could later foresee an extension to the remaining EaP countries on the basis of individual assessments of EU reform commitments and progress achieved, bearing in mind the need to sustain the coherence of the EaP and in line with the inclusiveness principle; this dialogue could include meetings on the margins of the European Council with leaders of the associated countries on a structured basis, and regular participation of their representatives in the meetings of the European Council working groups and committees; Or. en AM\1207163EN.docx PE647.648v01-00 EN United in diversityEN 9.6.2020 A9-0112/4 Amendment 4 Anna Bonfrisco, Susanna Ceccardi, Thierry Mariani, Jérôme Rivière, Harald Vilimsky, Marco Zanni on behalf of the ID Group Report A9-0112/2020 Petras Auštrevičius European Parliament recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on the Eastern Partnership, in the run-up to the June 2020 Summit (2019/2209(INI)) Proposal for a recommendation Recital D Proposal for a recommendation Amendment D. whereas increased cooperation D. whereas the difficulties all EaP between the EU and the EaP countries is countries are having in achieving the EU not a linear process and a fully-fledged objectives show the limitations of the cooperation can be achieved and partnership itself, in particular when it maintained only insofar as the core comes to implementing an effective European values and principles are strategy vis-à-vis six countries that are not respected during the constitutional and geographical neighbours and are legislative process and if the fight against economically, socially, historically and corruption, organised crime, money culturally diverse; laundering, oligarchic structures and nepotism is guaranteed; stresses, however, that in serious cases of backsliding cooperation can be reversed; Or. en AM\1207163EN.docx PE647.648v01-00 EN United in diversityEN 9.6.2020 A9-0112/5 Amendment 5 Anna Bonfrisco, Susanna Ceccardi, Thierry Mariani, Jérôme Rivière, Harald Vilimsky, Marco Zanni on behalf of the ID Group Report A9-0112/2020 Petras Auštrevičius European Parliament recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on the Eastern Partnership, in the run-up to the June 2020 Summit (2019/2209(INI)) Proposal for a recommendation Recital G Proposal for a recommendation Amendment G. whereas since the establishment of G. whereas since the establishment of the EaP, partner countries have displayed a the EaP, partner countries have shown varied pace of political and economic economic and financial instability and, reform, due to both internal and external for the EU, the relationship with the EaP factors, and have not yet reached a point has entailed a number of difficulties and where these reforms are irreversible; risks linked to the fragile state structure of those countries, such as corruption, illegal trafficking, terrorism and ethno- territorial conflicts; Or. en AM\1207163EN.docx PE647.648v01-00 EN United in diversityEN 9.6.2020 A9-0112/6 Amendment 6 Anna Bonfrisco, Susanna Ceccardi, Thierry Mariani, Jérôme Rivière, Harald Vilimsky, Marco Zanni on behalf of the ID Group Report A9-0112/2020 Petras Auštrevičius European Parliament recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on the Eastern Partnership, in the run-up to the June 2020 Summit (2019/2209(INI)) Proposal for a recommendation Recital N Proposal for a recommendation Amendment N. whereas European prosperity and N. whereas European prosperity and security are closely linked to the situation security are closely linked to the situation of the neighbouring countries, and of the of the neighbouring countries, and of the EaP countries in particular; whereas the EaP countries in particular; whereas Eastern Partnership pursues the common European action – given the EU’s goals of good neighbourly relations and naturally limited and piecemeal foreign regional cooperation, and the revised policy, due to the absence of ‘European European Neighbourhood Policy should interest’ in this field – has never been able foster and strengthen capacities to resolve to resolve or prevent threats to security in bilateral disputes and strive for the area, but has often served, through reconciliation between societies in the economic influence, as a means of Eastern neighbourhood; gaining political benefits, and as a tool both for exerting pressure and in the geopolitical struggle with other non-EU powers; Or. en AM\1207163EN.docx PE647.648v01-00 EN United in diversityEN 9.6.2020 A9-0112/7 Amendment 7 Anna Bonfrisco, Susanna Ceccardi, Thierry Mariani, Jérôme Rivière, Harald Vilimsky, Marco Zanni on behalf of the ID Group Report A9-0112/2020 Petras Auštrevičius European Parliament recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on the Eastern Partnership, in the run-up to the June 2020 Summit (2019/2209(INI)) Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point a Proposal for a recommendation Amendment (a) acknowledge that the EaP (a) confirm the sovereign right of the countries have increasingly assumed EaP countries to freely choose their more responsibility and ownership with individual level of cooperation with the respect to the EaP initiative; underline the EU, in accordance with their political, importance of striving for a continuous social, legal and economic orientations, impetus towards effective cooperation, and to reject any external pressure on such intense dialogue and close partnership choice; within the EaP, enhanced by the transformational impact of the EaP policy, which supports reforms that generate positive political, social, economic and legal change in the EaP countries, taking into consideration their level of ambition towards the EU; highlight the associated countries’ striving for an ever closer relationship with the EU; confirm the sovereign right of the EaP countries to freely choose their individual level of cooperation or integration with the EU and to reject any external pressure on such choice; Or.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Azerbaijan Debacle: the Pace Debate on 23 January 2013
    AZERBAIJAN DEBACLE: THE PACE DEBATE ON 23 JANUARY 2013 Christoph Straesser Pedro Agramunt Berlin 11 February 2013 CAST OF CHARACTERS JEAN-CLAUDE MIGNON, PACE PRESIDENT (FRANCE) ........................................................................................... 5 PEDRO AGRAMUNT (SPAIN) ......................................................................................................................................... 5 CHRISTOPH STRAESSER (GERMANY) .......................................................................................................................... 6 ANNE BRASSEUR (LUXEMBOURG) ............................................................................................................................... 8 ROBERT WALTER (UNITED KINGDOM) ..................................................................................................................... 9 LUCA VOLONTE (ITALY) .............................................................................................................................................. 10 VIOLA VON CRAMON-TAUBADEL (GERMANY) ....................................................................................................... 11 LISE CHRISTOFFERSEN (NORWAY) ........................................................................................................................... 12 JEAN-MARIE BOCKEL (FRANCE) ............................................................................................................................... 13 MARINA SCHUSTER (GERMANY) ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast
    Briefing May 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 6 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 5 seats 1 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener Karin Feldinger 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Petra Steger Monika Vana* Stefan Windberger 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath Roman Haider Thomas Waitz* Stefan Zotti 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide Vesna Schuster Olga Voglauer Nini Tsiklauri 6. Wolfram Pirchner Julia Elisabeth Herr Elisabeth Dieringer-Granza Thomas Schobesberger Johannes Margreiter 7. Christian Sagartz Christian Alexander Dax Josef Graf Teresa Reiter 8. Barbara Thaler Stefanie Mösl Maximilian Kurz Isak Schneider 9. Christian Zoll Luca Peter Marco Kaiser Andrea Kerbleder Peter Berry 10. Claudia Wolf-Schöffmann Theresa Muigg Karin Berger Julia Reichenhauser NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. Likely to be elected Unlikely to be elected or *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. and/or take seat to take seat, if elected European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Paul Magnette 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 2. Maria Arena* 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Identit〠E Democrazia
    Identità e Democrazia Da Wikipedia, l'enciclopedia libera. Identità e Democrazia (in inglese: Identity and Identità e Democrazia Democracy, ID) è un gruppo politico del Parlamento Europeo di destra, fondato nel 2019 dopo le elezioni (EN) Identity and Democracy europee del 2019. Il gruppo è il successore del gruppo Presidente Marco Zanni fondato nel 2015 Europa delle Nazioni e della Libertà. (Lega) Vicepresidente Nicolas Bay (RN) Jörg Meuthen Indice (AfD) Storia Stato Unione Obiettivi politici europea Composizione Abbreviazione ID Note Fondazione 13 giugno 2019 Voci correlate Ideologia Nazionalismo Conservatorismo Storia nazionale Populismo di Il 12 giugno 2019 è stato annunciato che il gruppo destra successore a Europa delle Nazioni e delle Libertà si Identitarismo sarebbe chiamato "Identità e Democrazia" e avrebbe Sovranismo incluso partiti come la Lega Nord (Italia), Anti-immigrazione Raggruppamento Nazionale (Francia) e Alternativa per la Collocazione Destra [1] Germania (Germania)[2]. Il leghista Marco Zanni è stato Partito europeo AEPN nominato Presidente[3]. Il 13 giugno 2019 il gruppo, composto da 73 europarlamentari, è stato lanciato a Seggi 73 / 751 Bruxelles da Marine Le Pen[4]. Europarlamento Obiettivi politici I principali obiettivi politici del gruppo sono bloccare una maggiore integrazione europea ed ottenere maggiore autonomia nelle politiche di spesa, ovvero la possibilità di fare maggiore deficit e debito senza incorrere in penalità da parte della Commissione Europea.[5] Composizione Identità e Democrazia è formato da
    [Show full text]
  • Priority Question for Written Answer
    Priority question for written answer P-002058/2020 to the Commission Rule 138 Julie Lechanteux (ID), Mathilde Androuët (ID), Jordan Bardella (ID), Aurelia Beigneux (ID), Dominique Bilde (ID), Annika Bruna (ID), Gilbert Collard (ID), Jean-Paul Garraud (ID), Catherine Griset (ID), Jean-François Jalkh (ID), France Jamet (ID), Virginie Joron (ID), Herve Juvin (ID), Jean-Lin Lacapelle (ID), Hélène Laporte (ID), Gilles Lebreton (ID), Thierry Mariani (ID), André Rougé (ID), Nicolas Bay (ID), Maxette Pirbakas (ID) Subject: Legal basis for geo-tracking and the sharing of personal data during the coronavirus outbreak On 24 March 2020, the Commission revealed that it had held talks with telecommunications operators about joining forces to tackle the coronavirus outbreak. Thierry Breton, the Internal Market Commissioner, held a videoconference with the heads of Europe’s telecommunications companies and the GSMA (Global System for Mobile Communications) to explore options for sharing geolocation metadata in order to map and forecast the spread of the virus. The Commission claims that such a move would be fully in line with the General Data Protection Regulation and e-privacy legislation. How does the Commission intend to guarantee EU citizens full anonymisation of their personal data? How exactly does the Commission envisage using such data? Not content with surveillance and quarantine enforcement, Israel and a number of Asian countries have adopted a proactive AI-based approach that alerts individuals if they have been in contact with a virus carrier. How do the Commission’s plans compare, and what logistical support will it provide the Member States which opt for this approach? PE650.848v01-00.
    [Show full text]
  • Question for Written Answer
    Question for written answer E-005578/2020 to the Council Rule 138 Julie Lechanteux (ID), Virginie Joron (ID), André Rougé (ID), Jean-Lin Lacapelle (ID), Maximilian Krah (ID), Gilles Lebreton (ID), Gunnar Beck (ID), Herve Juvin (ID), France Jamet (ID) Subject: Navalny case: additional sanctions against Russia On 7 October 2020, the German and French Ministers for Foreign Affairs announced their intention of proposing additional sanctions against Russia to their European partners, stating that 'there is no other plausible explanation' than Russia being responsible for the incident involving the politician Alexei Navalny1, which he himself has described as an attempted poisoning. This explanation harks back to the famous 'highly likely’ statement made in 2018 by the then British Prime Minister, Theresa May. Apparently, the two ministers did not need to wait for the findings of a judicial investigation to assign responsibility (naming defendants), establish guilt (delivering a verdict) and impose sanctions (handing down sentences), in a case that is still far from being definitively solved. Does the Council not take the view that such a decision violates Articles 48 and 51 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, which state that 'everyone who has been charged shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law’ and that 'the provisions of this Charter are addressed to the institutions and bodies of the Union with due regard for the principle of subsidiarity and to the Member States only when they are implementing Union law'? Supporters2 1 https://agenceurope.eu/fr/bulletin/article/12576/39 2 This question is supported by Members other than the authors: Jean-Paul Garraud (ID), Thierry Mariani (ID) PE659.594v01-00.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Soft Power in France: Assessing Moscow's Cultural and Business Para- Diplomacy
    Russian Soft Power in France: Assessing Moscow's Cultural and Business Para- diplomacy January 8, 2018 Marlene Laruelle Senior Fellow, Carnegie Council; Research Professor, The George Washington University This paper is the first of a series of publications on Russia's influence in France. France constitutes the most prominent example of Russia's soft power in Western Europe, due not only to the long-lasting positive bilateral relations but also to the presence of an important Russian emigration since the 1920s that can act as a relay of influence. This project is supported by a grant from the Foundation Open Society Institute in cooperation with OSIFE of the Open Society Foundations. The French-Russian relationship is based on a long-standing tradition of cultural exchanges. In the 19th century, France was already one of the preferred destinations for Russian political exiles, and subsequently received several of the major waves of Russian emigration in the interwar period. Under the presidency of de Gaulle, it positioned itself as a European power relatively favorable to the Soviet Union. France's strong Communist tradition also encouraged a certain ideological proximity, and Russian was widely taught at secondary school level until the collapse of the USSR. The bilateral relationship is more complex today, characterized by close- knit economic and cultural interrelationships but also by political difficulties over the main international issues, the most important of which are Ukraine and Syria. Since the support shown by Russia to the European extreme right and the—now waning—honeymoon between the Front National (National Front) and some Kremlin circles, debate in France on the "Russian presence" and "Russia's networks of influence" has escalated, sometimes reaching extreme forms of paranoia founded on gross exaggeration, groundless supposition, and the reproduction of American arguments concerning the rumored Russian hand in electing Donald Trump.
    [Show full text]
  • En En Motion for a Resolution
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Plenary sitting B9-0168/2020 10.6.2020 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION pursuant to Rule 143 of the Rules of Procedure on placing the Antifa movement on the EU terrorist list Christine Anderson, Gerolf Annemans, Gunnar Beck, Aurelia Beigneux, Lars Patrick Berg, Dominique Bilde, Markus Buchheit, Jorge Buxadé Villalba, Gilbert Collard, Marcel de Graaff, Filip De Man, Derk Jan Eppink, Nicolaus Fest, Emmanouil Fragkos, Gianna Gancia, Catherine Griset, Roman Haider, Virginie Joron, Maximilian Krah, Joachim Kuhs, Jean-Lin Lacapelle, Gilles Lebreton, Jaak Madison, Thierry Mariani, Jörg Meuthen, Guido Reil, Jérôme Rivière, Rob Rooken, Robert Roos, Hermann Tertsch, Tom Vandendriessche, Harald Vilimsky, Charlie Weimers, Bernhard Zimniok, Milan Zver RE\1207171EN.docx PE647.651v01-00 EN United in diversityEN B9-0168/2020 Motion for a European Parliament resolution on placing the Antifa movement on the EU terrorist list The European Parliament, – having regard to the Council Common Position of 27 December 2001 on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism (2001/931/CFSP)1, ,– having regard to Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/20 of 13 January 2020 updating the list of persons, groups and entities subject to Articles 2, 3 and 4 of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism, and repealing Decision (CFSP) 2019/13412,, – having regard to Rule 143 of its Rules of Procedure, A. whereas a terrorist act is defined in Article 1(3) of the abovementioned Council Common Position; B. whereas Antifa has organised and carried out violent attacks in the United States under the guise of protesting the death of George Floyd; whereas Antifa is known to have incited and committed violence in Europe; whereas the movement has allegedly received training from other terrorist groups in Syria; 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 12.5.2021 A9-0153/7 Amendment 7 Anna Bonfrisco, Susanna Ceccardi, Marco Zanni, Marco Campomenosi, Thierry Mariani, Jérôme Rivi
    12.5.2021 A9-0153/7 Amendment 7 Anna Bonfrisco, Susanna Ceccardi, Marco Zanni, Marco Campomenosi, Thierry Mariani, Jérôme Rivière, Harald Vilimsky, Jaak Madison, Jörg Meuthen on behalf of the ID Group Report A9-0153/2021 Nacho Sánchez Amor 2019-2020 Reports on Turkey (2019/2176(INI)) Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment Aa. whereas the unacceptable provocations by the Erdogan regime should not be rewarded by continuing endless and pointless accession negotiations with Turkey; Or. en AM\1231433EN.docx PE692.533v01-00 EN United in diversityEN 12.5.2021 A9-0153/8 Amendment 8 Anna Bonfrisco, Susanna Ceccardi, Marco Zanni, Marco Campomenosi, Thierry Mariani, Jérôme Rivière, Harald Vilimsky, Jaak Madison, Jörg Meuthen on behalf of the ID Group Report A9-0153/2021 Nacho Sánchez Amor 2019-2020 Reports on Turkey (2019/2176(INI)) Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 Motion for a resolution Amendment 2. Notes that Turkey’s lack of 2. Underlines that the visit of Ursula political will to carry out the reforms von der Leyen and Charles Michel to required under the accession process and Ankara on 7 April, with the so-called its failure to address the EU’s serious ‘sofagate’, instead of being used as an concerns about the rule of law and opportunity to rebalance the geopolitical fundamental rights have deeply and dynamics between Europe and Turkey, negatively affected the accession process has once more shown the world the EU’s and its prospects and have led to EU- weakness in its relations with Turkey; Turkey relations
    [Show full text]
  • Hr Hr Zapisnik
    Europski parlament 2019-2024 Odbor za vanjske poslove AFET_PV(2021)0526_1 ZAPISNIK sa sjednice održane 26. svibnja 2021., 9:00 – 12:00 i 13:45 – 16:15 i 16:45 – 18:45 i 27. svibnja 2021., 9:00 – 12:00 i 13:45 – 16:15 BRUXELLES Sjednica je započela u srijedu 26. svibnja 2021. u 9:07. Predsjedao joj je predsjednik David McAllister. 1. Usvajanje dnevnog reda AFET_OJ(2021)0526_1 Dnevni red je usvojen. 2. Odobrenje zapisnika sa sjednice od: 23. travnja 2021. PE 691.434v01-00 Zapisnik je odobren. 3. Priopćenja predsjednika o odlukama koordinatora Predsjednik je objasnio da je, u skladu s člankom 214. Poslovnika Parlamenta, konačni zapisnik o odlukama donesenima na izvanrednim sastancima koordinatora odbora AFET održanima 12. i 17. svibnja 2021. stavljen na intranetsku stranicu odbora AFET i priložen zapisniku s ove sjednice. 4. Priopćenja predsjednika ***Glasovanje*** Predsjednik je najavio teme o kojima se glasovalo tijekom prvog glasovanja i otvorio PV\1233934HR.docx PE123456v01-00 HR Ujedinjena u raznolikosti HR postupak glasovanja preko aplikacije EPVote. Glasovalo se o sljedećim dosjeima odbora AFET: Izvješće o izvješćima Komisije o Bosni i Hercegovini za 2019. i 2020., 2019/2171(INI), Suradnja EU-a i NATO-a u kontekstu transatlantskih odnosa, 2020/2257(INI), Ocjena primjene članka 50. UEU-a, 2020/2136(INI) Usporedno su se odvijali postupci u odboru. 5. Izvješće o izvješćima Komisije o Bosni i Hercegovini za 2019. i 2020. AFET/9/01987 2019/2171(INI) Izvjestitelj: Paulo Rangel (PPE) PR – PE647.075v01-00 AM – PE648.334v02-00 Nadležni odbor: AFET Usvajanje amandmana Rok za podnošenje amandmana: 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Fr Fr Procès-Verbal
    Parlement européen 2019-2024 Commission de l’agriculture et du développement rural AGRI_PV(2020)0602_1 PROCÈS-VERBAL Réunion extraordinaire du 2 juin 2020, de 9 heures à 11 heures BRUXELLES La séance est ouverte le mardi 2 juin 2020 à 9 h 3, sous la présidence de Norbert Lins, président. Avec la participation à distance de membres de la commission AGRI, du Conseil et de la Commission 1. Adoption de l’ordre du jour AGRI_OJ(2020)0602_1 Le projet d’ordre du jour est adopté. 2. Communications de la présidence Néant. 3. Échange de vues avec le commissaire Johannes Hahn, chargé du budget et de l’administration, sur la nouvelle proposition relative au CFP et le plan de relance après la pandémie de COVID-19, avec un accent particulier sur la future PAC et les questions relatives à l’agriculture Interviennent: Norbert Lins, Johannes Hahn, Herbert Dorfmann, Paolo De Castro, Ulrike Müller, Ivan David, Martin Häusling, Zbigniew Kuźmiuk, Luke Ming Flanagan, Marlene Mortler, Eric Andrieu, Elsi Katainen, Petri Sarvamaa, Clara Aguilera, Angelo Ciocca, Thomas Waitz, Franc Bogovič, Veronika Vrecionová, Jan Huitema, Pina Picierno, Riho Terras, Manuel Bompard, Balázs Hidvéghi, Marc Tarabella, Isabel Carvalhais, Daniel Buda PV\1206897FR.docx PE653.719v01-00 FR Unie dans la diversitéFR 4. Communications de la présidence Ouverture de la procédure de vote à distance *** Procédure de vote à distance *** 5. Règlement délégué de la Commission dérogeant, en ce qui concerne l’année 2020, au règlement délégué (UE) 2017/891 de la Commission en ce qui concerne le secteur
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Results
    Briefing June 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Results Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 7 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 3 seats 2 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Heinz Christian Strache 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide 6. Alexander Bernhuber 7. Barbara Thaler NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 1. Maria Arena* Socialist Party (PS) Christian Social Party 3. Johan Van Overtveldt 2. Marc Tarabella* (S&D) 2 seats (CSP) (EPP) 1 seat New Flemish Alliance (N-VA) 1. Olivier Chastel (Greens/EFA) Reformist 2. Frédérique Ries* 4 seats Movement (MR) (ALDE) 2 seats 1. Philippe Lamberts* 2. Saskia Bricmont 1. Guy Verhofstadt* Ecolo (Greens/EFA) 2. Hilde Vautmans* 2 seats Open Flemish Liberals and Democrats (Open 1. Benoît Lutgen Humanist VLD) (ALDE) 2 seats democratic centre (cdH) (EPP) 1 seat 1. Kris Peeters Workers’ Party of 1.
    [Show full text]
  • En En Amendments 1
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on Industry, Research and Energy 2020/2217(INI) 12.11.2020 AMENDMENTS 1 - 367 Draft report Miapetra Kumpula-Natri (PE657.163v03-00) A European strategy for data (2020/2217(INI)) AM\1218025EN.docx PE660.285v01-00 EN United in diversityEN AM_Com_NonLegReport PE660.285v01-00 2/173 AM\1218025EN.docx EN Amendment 1 Josianne Cutajar, Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Lina Gálvez Muñoz, Carlos Zorrinho, Łukasz Kohut, Romana Jerković, Nicolás González Casares, Ivo Hristov Motion for a resolution Citation 6 a (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment - having regard to the findings of the Digital Economy and Society Index 2020, published on the 11th of June 2020 Or. en Amendment 2 Nicola Danti, Andrus Ansip, Mauri Pekkarinen, Christophe Grudler, Valérie Hayer, Susana Solís Pérez, Dragoș Pîslaru, Iskra Mihaylova, Klemen Grošelj, Martina Dlabajová Motion for a resolution Citation 7 a (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment - having regard to the Member States Joint Declaration on Cloud of 15 October 2020; Or. en Amendment 3 Manuel Bompard, Marisa Matias, Cornelia Ernst on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Motion for a resolution Citation 22 a (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment - having regard to the Court of Justice of the European Union ruling on the Schrems II case C-311/18, from July 16 2020, AM\1218025EN.docx 3/173 PE660.285v01-00 EN Or. en Amendment 4 Damian Boeselager on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group Motion for a resolution Citation 22 a (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment - having regard to the Commission communication of 21 October 2020 entitled ‘Open source software strategy 2020 – 2023’ Or.
    [Show full text]