DOCSLIB.ORG

12.5.2021 A9-0153/7 Amendment 7 Anna Bonfrisco, Susanna Ceccardi, Marco Zanni, Marco Campomenosi, Thierry Mariani, Jérôme Rivi

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
12.5.2021 A9-0153/7 Amendment 7 Anna Bonfrisco, Susanna Ceccardi, Marco Zanni, Marco Campomenosi, Thierry Mariani, Jérôme Rivi 12.5.2021 A9-0153/7 Amendment 7 Anna Bonfrisco, Susanna Ceccardi, Marco Zanni, Marco Campomenosi, Thierry Mariani, Jérôme Rivière, Harald Vilimsky, Jaak Madison, Jörg Meuthen on behalf of the ID Group Report A9-0153/2021 Nacho Sánchez Amor 2019-2020 Reports on Turkey (2019/2176(INI)) Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment Aa. whereas the unacceptable provocations by the Erdogan regime should not be rewarded by continuing endless and pointless accession negotiations with Turkey; Or. en AM\1231433EN.docx PE692.533v01-00 EN United in diversityEN 12.5.2021 A9-0153/8 Amendment 8 Anna Bonfrisco, Susanna Ceccardi, Marco Zanni, Marco Campomenosi, Thierry Mariani, Jérôme Rivière, Harald Vilimsky, Jaak Madison, Jörg Meuthen on behalf of the ID Group Report A9-0153/2021 Nacho Sánchez Amor 2019-2020 Reports on Turkey (2019/2176(INI)) Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 Motion for a resolution Amendment 2. Notes that Turkey’s lack of 2. Underlines that the visit of Ursula political will to carry out the reforms von der Leyen and Charles Michel to required under the accession process and Ankara on 7 April, with the so-called its failure to address the EU’s serious ‘sofagate’, instead of being used as an concerns about the rule of law and opportunity to rebalance the geopolitical fundamental rights have deeply and dynamics between Europe and Turkey, negatively affected the accession process has once more shown the world the EU’s and its prospects and have led to EU- weakness in its relations with Turkey; Turkey relations becoming progressively considers that the evidence of the facts – more transactional and driven by taking into account also the continuous circumstances that barely reflect the countless provocations towards Member original intended format of gradual and States, the aggressive behaviour in the progressive alignment with predetermined Mediterranean, the instrumentalisation of benchmarks; notes that as a result, within refugees and the threat of unbearable the framework of accession negotiations, migratory pressure – has now turned the only 16 of the 35 chapters have been European hope of starting to build a opened and only one chapter has been ‘positive dynamic’ with Turkey, as provisionally closed; stresses, therefore, reported in the Council conclusions of 25 that under the current circumstances, March, into a utopian exercise in itself; Turkey’s accession negotiations have calls on the Commission and the Council effectively and regrettably come to a to unconditionally and irrevocably standstill; terminate all negotiations regarding Turkey’s accession to the EU, as it is not a European country and does not act in accordance with European values, particularly those aimed at preserving a peaceful Europe, and should therefore not become a member of the European Union; Or. en AM\1231433EN.docx PE692.533v01-00 EN United in diversityEN 12.5.2021 A9-0153/9 Amendment 9 Anna Bonfrisco, Susanna Ceccardi, Marco Zanni, Marco Campomenosi, Thierry Mariani, Jérôme Rivière, Harald Vilimsky, Jaak Madison, Jörg Meuthen on behalf of the ID Group Report A9-0153/2021 Nacho Sánchez Amor 2019-2020 Reports on Turkey (2019/2176(INI)) Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 Motion for a resolution Amendment 9. In this context, stresses the 9. Calls on the Commission and the importance of ensuring, in parallel with a Council to terminate all funding to capacity of dialogue at institutional level, Turkey in terms of the pre-accession close functioning links with Turkish process, the current and planned society; therefore urges the Commission multiannual financial framework, the and the European External Action Facility for Refugees in Turkey and the Service (EEAS) to prioritise the vibrant EU-Turkey action plan on migration; civil society in Turkey and its pro- calls furthermore for the EU to stop all democracy efforts, and to continue to European Investment Bank loans to support Turkish civil society Turkey; underlines that Turkey is using organisations through relevant financial the Facility for Refugees to challenge and instruments, including the Instrument for blackmail the EU and its Member States, Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA), as these in order to obtain some leverage for organisations could contribute to political, economic or military generating the political will necessary for concessions, to justify its aggressive building strong foundations for the EU behaviour towards the EU Member States integration process; reiterates, in this and to pursue its foreign policy ambitions; context, its demand that the IPA funding reiterates that the EU should definitively for political reforms in Turkey be stop considering a modernisation of the managed by the EU and continue to focus EU-Turkey Customs Union, also taking on fostering dialogue and providing into account that the continuous support for civil society, non-state actors violations of human rights and and people-to-people contacts, as long as fundamental freedoms by the Erdogan the country is not making any progress regime would make any alleged strong with regard to democracy, the rule of law conditionality on those aspects impossible and human rights; encourages a new and to be fulfilled; asks for the suspension of immediate constructive dialogue the EU-Turkey Customs Union mechanism with Turkish civil society for agreement, which entered into force on 31 mutual confidence building and for December 1995; sustaining the democratic and pro- European aspirations of Turkish society, AM\1231433EN.docx PE692.533v01-00 EN United in diversityEN supporting exchanges in particular on democratisation, human rights, the rule of law, good governance, sustainable development and the green and digital transitions, while relying on adequate EU funding for effective results; asks the Commission and the EEAS to continue to support young people in Turkey through relevant financial instruments and by extending participation in the Erasmus+ programme and the Jean Monnet scholarships, with a view to supporting, inter alia, research cooperation and the common fight against climate change, the protection of the environment and the empowerment of women in society and business; Or. en AM\1231433EN.docx PE692.533v01-00 EN United in diversityEN 12.5.2021 A9-0153/10 Amendment 10 Thierry Mariani, Jérôme Rivière, Anna Bonfrisco, Susanna Ceccardi, Marco Zanni, Marco Campomenosi, Harald Vilimsky, Jaak Madison, Jörg Meuthen on behalf of the ID Group Report A9-0153/2021 Nacho Sánchez Amor 2019-2020 Reports on Turkey (2019/2176(INI)) Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 Motion for a resolution Amendment 30. Urges Turkey to refrain from 30. Urges Turkey to refrain from detaining and prosecuting journalists and detaining and prosecuting journalists and human rights defenders as a means of human rights defenders as a means of intimidating them or discouraging them intimidating them or discouraging them from freely reporting on human rights from freely reporting on human rights issues; urges Turkey to promptly and issues; urges Turkey to promptly and independently investigate reported independently investigate reported instances of intimidation and harassment of instances of intimidation and harassment of human rights defenders, journalists, human rights defenders, journalists, academics and civil society activists, and to academics and civil society activists, and to hold accountable those responsible for such hold accountable those responsible for such abuses; abuses; underlines the increase in discrimination against Christians in Turkey; draws particular attention to the cases of Simoni Diril, who was kidnapped and murdered, and Hurmuz Diril, who was kidnapped and is missing, cases that are still not being investigated by the Turkish authorities; Or. en AM\1231433EN.docx PE692.533v01-00 EN United in diversityEN.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Azerbaijan Debacle: the Pace Debate on 23 January 2013
    AZERBAIJAN DEBACLE: THE PACE DEBATE ON 23 JANUARY 2013 Christoph Straesser Pedro Agramunt Berlin 11 February 2013 CAST OF CHARACTERS JEAN-CLAUDE MIGNON, PACE PRESIDENT (FRANCE) ........................................................................................... 5 PEDRO AGRAMUNT (SPAIN) ......................................................................................................................................... 5 CHRISTOPH STRAESSER (GERMANY) .......................................................................................................................... 6 ANNE BRASSEUR (LUXEMBOURG) ............................................................................................................................... 8 ROBERT WALTER (UNITED KINGDOM) ..................................................................................................................... 9 LUCA VOLONTE (ITALY) .............................................................................................................................................. 10 VIOLA VON CRAMON-TAUBADEL (GERMANY) ....................................................................................................... 11 LISE CHRISTOFFERSEN (NORWAY) ........................................................................................................................... 12 JEAN-MARIE BOCKEL (FRANCE) ............................................................................................................................... 13 MARINA SCHUSTER (GERMANY) ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lo Scorso Giugno L'organizzazione Internazionale Wikileaks Ha Pubblicato Una Presunta Bozza Dell'accordo Commerciale Sugli Scambi Di Servizi (Tisa)
    Lo scorso giugno l'organizzazione internazionale WikiLeaks ha pubblicato una presunta bozza dell'Accordo commerciale sugli scambi di servizi (TiSA). Tali rivelazioni, che denotano importanti conseguenze in merito alla privatizzazione di servizi fondamentali, come banche, sanità e istruzione, vanno ad aggiungersi alle analisi previste dai negoziati in atto, quali la disamina dei principi comuni per la regolamentazione dei servizi finanziari e la valutazione dei potenziali vantaggi per crescita e occupazione. L'UE ha inoltre pubblicato recentemente un concept paper che indica una struttura dell'accordo basata su un approccio modulare simile a quello utilizzato per il ciclo negoziale di Doha. Per giunta l'accordo, oltre ad essere delineato con marginale trasparenza, potrebbe, secondo le disposizioni, non essere rivelato per i cinque anni successivi alla sua approvazione. A tal proposito, può la Commissione indicare: — come il TiSA determinerà le politiche economiche dei maggiori paesi a capitalismo avanzato e se i parlamenti degli Stati interessati verranno coinvolti; — quali benefici concreti potranno avverarsi per crescita e occupazione, e come il disciplinamento delle attività finanziarie e dei servizi summenzionati verrà alterato; — se ritiene che l'approccio strutturale indicato possa portare a un risultato fallimentare come accaduto per il Doha Round e se, in omaggio alla trasparenza, prevede una consultazione pubblica relativamente ai dieci cicli di negoziati che avranno luogo quest'autunno? Marco Valli (EFDD) , Tiziana Beghin (EFDD) , David Borrelli (EFDD) , Fabio Massimo Castaldo (EFDD) , Ignazio Corrao (EFDD) , Laura Ferrara (EFDD) , Dario Tamburrano (EFDD) , Marco Zanni (EFDD) Secondo quanto riferito di recente da diversi comunicati stampa, la Commissione potrebbe approvare il piano di aiuti di Stato del Regno Unito a favore della centrale nucleare «Hinkley Point C».
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast
    Briefing May 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 6 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 5 seats 1 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener Karin Feldinger 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Petra Steger Monika Vana* Stefan Windberger 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath Roman Haider Thomas Waitz* Stefan Zotti 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide Vesna Schuster Olga Voglauer Nini Tsiklauri 6. Wolfram Pirchner Julia Elisabeth Herr Elisabeth Dieringer-Granza Thomas Schobesberger Johannes Margreiter 7. Christian Sagartz Christian Alexander Dax Josef Graf Teresa Reiter 8. Barbara Thaler Stefanie Mösl Maximilian Kurz Isak Schneider 9. Christian Zoll Luca Peter Marco Kaiser Andrea Kerbleder Peter Berry 10. Claudia Wolf-Schöffmann Theresa Muigg Karin Berger Julia Reichenhauser NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. Likely to be elected Unlikely to be elected or *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. and/or take seat to take seat, if elected European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Paul Magnette 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 2. Maria Arena* 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Objection Résolution Di ECR “Lead Gunshot in Or Around Wetlands”- Risultati Votazione Per Appello Nominale
    Objection Résolution di ECR “Lead gunshot in or around Wetlands”- Risultati votazione per appello nominale Favorevoli 292 + ECR Aguilar, Sergio Berlato (FRATELLI D’ITALIA- Intergruppo Caccia), Buxadé Villalba, de la Pisa Carrión, Dzhambazki, Eppink, Carlo Fidanza (FRATELLI D’ITALIA- Intergruppo Caccia ) , Pietro Fiocchi (FRATELLI D’ITALIA- Intergruppo Caccia ) , Raffaele Fitto (FRATELLI D’ITALIA - Intergruppo Caccia ) , Geuking, Kempa, Lundgren, Nicola Procaccini (FRATELLI D’ITALIA- Intergruppo Caccia ) , Rooken, Roos, Ruissen, Slabakov, Raffaele Stancanelli (FRATELLI D’ITALIA- Intergruppo Caccia ) Stegrud, Terheş, Tertsch, Tomaševski, Tomašić, Tošenovský, Vondra, Vrecionová, Weimers, Zahradil GUE/NGL: Konečná, MacManus ID: Matteo Adinolfi (LEGA- Intergruppo Caccia) , Anderson, Androuët, Annemans, Simona Baldassarre (LEGA), Bardella , Alessandra Basso (LEGA), Bay, Beck, Berg, Bilde, Mara Bizzotto (LEGA- Intergruppo Caccia ) , Blaško, Anna Cinzia Bonfrisco (LEGA), Paolo Borchia (LEGA), Buchheit, Marco Campomenosi, (LEGA- Intergruppo Caccia ), Massimo Casanova (LEGA- Intergruppo Caccia ) ; Susanna Ceccardi (LEGA- Intergruppo Caccia ) , Angelo Ciocca (LEGA), Collard, Rosanna Conte (LEGA- Intergruppo Caccia) , Gianantonio Da Re, (LEGA- Intergruppo Caccia ) David, De Man, Francesca Donato (LEGA- Intergruppo Caccia ), Marco Dreosto (LEGA- Intergruppo Caccia ), Fest, Gianna Gancia (LEGA), Garraud, Grant, Griset, Haider, Hakkarainen, Huhtasaari, Jalkh, Jamet, Juvin, Krah, Kuhs, Lacapelle, Oscar Lancini (LEGA- Intergruppo Caccia ), Laporte, Lebreton,
    [Show full text]
  • Identit〠E Democrazia
    Identità e Democrazia Da Wikipedia, l'enciclopedia libera. Identità e Democrazia (in inglese: Identity and Identità e Democrazia Democracy, ID) è un gruppo politico del Parlamento Europeo di destra, fondato nel 2019 dopo le elezioni (EN) Identity and Democracy europee del 2019. Il gruppo è il successore del gruppo Presidente Marco Zanni fondato nel 2015 Europa delle Nazioni e della Libertà. (Lega) Vicepresidente Nicolas Bay (RN) Jörg Meuthen Indice (AfD) Storia Stato Unione Obiettivi politici europea Composizione Abbreviazione ID Note Fondazione 13 giugno 2019 Voci correlate Ideologia Nazionalismo Conservatorismo Storia nazionale Populismo di Il 12 giugno 2019 è stato annunciato che il gruppo destra successore a Europa delle Nazioni e delle Libertà si Identitarismo sarebbe chiamato "Identità e Democrazia" e avrebbe Sovranismo incluso partiti come la Lega Nord (Italia), Anti-immigrazione Raggruppamento Nazionale (Francia) e Alternativa per la Collocazione Destra [1] Germania (Germania)[2]. Il leghista Marco Zanni è stato Partito europeo AEPN nominato Presidente[3]. Il 13 giugno 2019 il gruppo, composto da 73 europarlamentari, è stato lanciato a Seggi 73 / 751 Bruxelles da Marine Le Pen[4]. Europarlamento Obiettivi politici I principali obiettivi politici del gruppo sono bloccare una maggiore integrazione europea ed ottenere maggiore autonomia nelle politiche di spesa, ovvero la possibilità di fare maggiore deficit e debito senza incorrere in penalità da parte della Commissione Europea.[5] Composizione Identità e Democrazia è formato da
    [Show full text]
  • Priority Question for Written Answer
    Priority question for written answer P-002058/2020 to the Commission Rule 138 Julie Lechanteux (ID), Mathilde Androuët (ID), Jordan Bardella (ID), Aurelia Beigneux (ID), Dominique Bilde (ID), Annika Bruna (ID), Gilbert Collard (ID), Jean-Paul Garraud (ID), Catherine Griset (ID), Jean-François Jalkh (ID), France Jamet (ID), Virginie Joron (ID), Herve Juvin (ID), Jean-Lin Lacapelle (ID), Hélène Laporte (ID), Gilles Lebreton (ID), Thierry Mariani (ID), André Rougé (ID), Nicolas Bay (ID), Maxette Pirbakas (ID) Subject: Legal basis for geo-tracking and the sharing of personal data during the coronavirus outbreak On 24 March 2020, the Commission revealed that it had held talks with telecommunications operators about joining forces to tackle the coronavirus outbreak. Thierry Breton, the Internal Market Commissioner, held a videoconference with the heads of Europe’s telecommunications companies and the GSMA (Global System for Mobile Communications) to explore options for sharing geolocation metadata in order to map and forecast the spread of the virus. The Commission claims that such a move would be fully in line with the General Data Protection Regulation and e-privacy legislation. How does the Commission intend to guarantee EU citizens full anonymisation of their personal data? How exactly does the Commission envisage using such data? Not content with surveillance and quarantine enforcement, Israel and a number of Asian countries have adopted a proactive AI-based approach that alerts individuals if they have been in contact with a virus carrier. How do the Commission’s plans compare, and what logistical support will it provide the Member States which opt for this approach? PE650.848v01-00.
    [Show full text]
  • L'italia in Europa
    L'ITALIA IN EUROPA ELEZIONI EUROPEE 2019 144/2019 | GIORNALE ITALIANO DE ESPAÑA - GRATUITO | WWW.ILGIORNALEITALIANO.NET | D.L.: MA-884-2008 MADRID IL 26 MAGGIO PER IL NUOVO PARLAMENTO EUROPEO Il giorno europeo o Festa dell'Europa si celebra il 9 maggio di ogni anno. Questa data ricorda il giorno del 1950 in cui vi fu la presentazione da parte di Robert Schuman del piano di cooperazione economica, ideato da Jean Monnet ed esposto nella Dichiarazione Schuman, che segna l'inizio del processo d'integrazione europea con l'obiettivo di una futura unione federale. Bilancio elabora il bilancio dell’Unione europea, insieme al Consiglio; approva il bilancio di lungo periodo dell’UE, il "quadro finanziario pluriennale". Composizione Il numero di eurodeputati per ogni paese è approssimativamente proporzionale alla popolazione di ciascuno di essi, secondo i criteri della proporzionalità degressiva: un paese non può avere meno di 6 o più di 96 eurodeputati e il numero totale non può superare i 751 (750 più il presidente). I gruppi parlamentari sono organizzati in base allo schieramento politico, non in base alla nazionalità. Il presidente rappresenta il Parlamento europeo nei confronti delle altre istituzioni dell'UE e del mondo esterno e dà l'approvazione finale al bilancio dell'UE. Come funziona il Parlamento europeo? Il lavoro del Parlamento europeo si articola in due fasi principali: Il Parlamento europeo è l'organo legislativo dell'UE che è eletto direttamente dai commissioni - preparano la legislazione. cittadini dell'Unione ogni cinque anni. Le ultime elezioni si sono svolte nel maggio Il Parlamento europeo conta 20 commissioni e due sottocommissioni, 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Question for Written Answer
    Question for written answer E-005578/2020 to the Council Rule 138 Julie Lechanteux (ID), Virginie Joron (ID), André Rougé (ID), Jean-Lin Lacapelle (ID), Maximilian Krah (ID), Gilles Lebreton (ID), Gunnar Beck (ID), Herve Juvin (ID), France Jamet (ID) Subject: Navalny case: additional sanctions against Russia On 7 October 2020, the German and French Ministers for Foreign Affairs announced their intention of proposing additional sanctions against Russia to their European partners, stating that 'there is no other plausible explanation' than Russia being responsible for the incident involving the politician Alexei Navalny1, which he himself has described as an attempted poisoning. This explanation harks back to the famous 'highly likely’ statement made in 2018 by the then British Prime Minister, Theresa May. Apparently, the two ministers did not need to wait for the findings of a judicial investigation to assign responsibility (naming defendants), establish guilt (delivering a verdict) and impose sanctions (handing down sentences), in a case that is still far from being definitively solved. Does the Council not take the view that such a decision violates Articles 48 and 51 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, which state that 'everyone who has been charged shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law’ and that 'the provisions of this Charter are addressed to the institutions and bodies of the Union with due regard for the principle of subsidiarity and to the Member States only when they are implementing Union law'? Supporters2 1 https://agenceurope.eu/fr/bulletin/article/12576/39 2 This question is supported by Members other than the authors: Jean-Paul Garraud (ID), Thierry Mariani (ID) PE659.594v01-00.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Soft Power in France: Assessing Moscow's Cultural and Business Para- Diplomacy
    Russian Soft Power in France: Assessing Moscow's Cultural and Business Para- diplomacy January 8, 2018 Marlene Laruelle Senior Fellow, Carnegie Council; Research Professor, The George Washington University This paper is the first of a series of publications on Russia's influence in France. France constitutes the most prominent example of Russia's soft power in Western Europe, due not only to the long-lasting positive bilateral relations but also to the presence of an important Russian emigration since the 1920s that can act as a relay of influence. This project is supported by a grant from the Foundation Open Society Institute in cooperation with OSIFE of the Open Society Foundations. The French-Russian relationship is based on a long-standing tradition of cultural exchanges. In the 19th century, France was already one of the preferred destinations for Russian political exiles, and subsequently received several of the major waves of Russian emigration in the interwar period. Under the presidency of de Gaulle, it positioned itself as a European power relatively favorable to the Soviet Union. France's strong Communist tradition also encouraged a certain ideological proximity, and Russian was widely taught at secondary school level until the collapse of the USSR. The bilateral relationship is more complex today, characterized by close- knit economic and cultural interrelationships but also by political difficulties over the main international issues, the most important of which are Ukraine and Syria. Since the support shown by Russia to the European extreme right and the—now waning—honeymoon between the Front National (National Front) and some Kremlin circles, debate in France on the "Russian presence" and "Russia's networks of influence" has escalated, sometimes reaching extreme forms of paranoia founded on gross exaggeration, groundless supposition, and the reproduction of American arguments concerning the rumored Russian hand in electing Donald Trump.
    [Show full text]
  • En En Motion for a Resolution
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Plenary sitting B9-0168/2020 10.6.2020 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION pursuant to Rule 143 of the Rules of Procedure on placing the Antifa movement on the EU terrorist list Christine Anderson, Gerolf Annemans, Gunnar Beck, Aurelia Beigneux, Lars Patrick Berg, Dominique Bilde, Markus Buchheit, Jorge Buxadé Villalba, Gilbert Collard, Marcel de Graaff, Filip De Man, Derk Jan Eppink, Nicolaus Fest, Emmanouil Fragkos, Gianna Gancia, Catherine Griset, Roman Haider, Virginie Joron, Maximilian Krah, Joachim Kuhs, Jean-Lin Lacapelle, Gilles Lebreton, Jaak Madison, Thierry Mariani, Jörg Meuthen, Guido Reil, Jérôme Rivière, Rob Rooken, Robert Roos, Hermann Tertsch, Tom Vandendriessche, Harald Vilimsky, Charlie Weimers, Bernhard Zimniok, Milan Zver RE\1207171EN.docx PE647.651v01-00 EN United in diversityEN B9-0168/2020 Motion for a European Parliament resolution on placing the Antifa movement on the EU terrorist list The European Parliament, – having regard to the Council Common Position of 27 December 2001 on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism (2001/931/CFSP)1, ,– having regard to Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/20 of 13 January 2020 updating the list of persons, groups and entities subject to Articles 2, 3 and 4 of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism, and repealing Decision (CFSP) 2019/13412,, – having regard to Rule 143 of its Rules of Procedure, A. whereas a terrorist act is defined in Article 1(3) of the abovementioned Council Common Position; B. whereas Antifa has organised and carried out violent attacks in the United States under the guise of protesting the death of George Floyd; whereas Antifa is known to have incited and committed violence in Europe; whereas the movement has allegedly received training from other terrorist groups in Syria; 1.
    [Show full text]
  • La Lega in Europa Resta Coi Sovranisti Il Partito Si Divide Sul Patto Con Il
    Quotidiano Data 13-10-2020 LA STAMPA Pagina 9 Foglio 1 Oggi il vertice con gli eurodeputati, Salvini frena e spera nella svolta a destra della Cdu no.Del resto,comeripeteGior- getti che oggi sarà all'incon- tro, non si può governare sen- za avere aproprio favore leisti- La Lega in Europa resta coi sovranisti tuzioni che contano. Oggi non si parlerà solo di collocazione in Europa.Gli eu- Il partito si divide sul patto con il Ppe rodeputati leghisti eletti nelle circoscrizioni del Sud lamenta- no la gestione del partito da parte dei commissari lombar- inflessibile. «Non cambiamo decidere sui fondi europei per gruppo del Ppe, alla presiden di.mandatida Salvini.Viene lo- IL RETROSCENA assolutamente nulla, è un di- l'agricoltura. Non dobbiamo za del Parlamento europeo ro attribuito il pessimo risulta- battito giornalistico surreale», isolarci»,ripete Da Re.Il prossi- per sostituire il socialista Da to alle amministrative. Il cala- AMEOEOLAMATPINA dice Salvini.. Spera però che la mo anno il Carroccio dovrà de- vid Sassoli. Passo dopo passo brese Vincenzo Sofo ricorda ROMA Cdu tedesca si muova verso de- cidere se votare iltedesco Man- senza strappi ma con una tra che nel 2019 il consenso dei er il momento non stra nelsuo prossimo congres- fred Weber, l'attuale capo- iettoria verso l'area di gover pugliesi era del 25,3%, un an- r m nelerri la Lega so, cosi da potere bussare alla no dopo al 10%.«Stesso discor- rimane gruppo porta del Ppe. Intanto oggi so vale per la Campania, ma pIdentità eDemocrazia qualche indicazione in più ri- «LA LEGA SI RINNOVA» più eloquente - sostiene Sofo - accanto a Marine Le Pen e ai spetto al mantra «non cambia è il caso Calabria: alle europee nazionalisti di Alternativa per nulla» dovrà darlo.A Strasbur- la Lega è stata votata dal la Germania per non perdere go la discussione è agitata.
    [Show full text]
  • C85 Official Journal
    Official Journal C 85 of the European Union Volume 64 English edition Information and Notices 12 March 2021 Contents IV Notices NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES European Parliament 2019-2020 SESSION Sittings of 2 to 4 July 2019 2021/C 85/01 Minutes of the sitting of 2 July 2019 . 1 2021/C 85/02 Minutes of the sitting of 3 July 2019 . 6 2021/C 85/03 Minutes of the sitting of 4 July 2019 . 28 EN Key to symbols used * Consultation procedure *** Consent procedure ***I Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading ***II Ordinary legislative procedure: second reading ***III Ordinary legislative procedure: third reading (The type of procedure is determined by the legal basis proposed in the draft act.) Abbreviations used for Parliamentary Committees AFET Committee on Foreign Affairs DEVE Committee on Development INTA Committee on International Trade BUDG Committee on Budgets CONT Committee on Budgetary Control ECON Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs EMPL Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ENVI Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ITRE Committee on Industry, Research and Energy IMCO Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection TRAN Committee on Transport and Tourism REGI Committee on Regional Development AGRI Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development PECH Committee on Fisheries CULT Committee on Culture and Education JURI Committee on Legal Affairs LIBE Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs AFCO Committee on Constitutional Affairs FEMM
    [Show full text]