DOCSLIB.ORG

En En Amendments 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on Industry, Research and Energy 2020/2217(INI) 12.11.2020 AMENDMENTS 1 - 367 Draft report Miapetra Kumpula-Natri (PE657.163v03-00) A European strategy for data (2020/2217(INI)) AM\1218025EN.docx PE660.285v01-00 EN United in diversityEN AM_Com_NonLegReport PE660.285v01-00 2/173 AM\1218025EN.docx EN Amendment 1 Josianne Cutajar, Miapetra Kumpula-Natri, Lina Gálvez Muñoz, Carlos Zorrinho, Łukasz Kohut, Romana Jerković, Nicolás González Casares, Ivo Hristov Motion for a resolution Citation 6 a (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment - having regard to the findings of the Digital Economy and Society Index 2020, published on the 11th of June 2020 Or. en Amendment 2 Nicola Danti, Andrus Ansip, Mauri Pekkarinen, Christophe Grudler, Valérie Hayer, Susana Solís Pérez, Dragoș Pîslaru, Iskra Mihaylova, Klemen Grošelj, Martina Dlabajová Motion for a resolution Citation 7 a (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment - having regard to the Member States Joint Declaration on Cloud of 15 October 2020; Or. en Amendment 3 Manuel Bompard, Marisa Matias, Cornelia Ernst on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Motion for a resolution Citation 22 a (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment - having regard to the Court of Justice of the European Union ruling on the Schrems II case C-311/18, from July 16 2020, AM\1218025EN.docx 3/173 PE660.285v01-00 EN Or. en Amendment 4 Damian Boeselager on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group Motion for a resolution Citation 22 a (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment - having regard to the Commission communication of 21 October 2020 entitled ‘Open source software strategy 2020 – 2023’ Or. en Amendment 5 Eva Maydell, Tomas Tobé, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Angelika Niebler, Ivan Štefanec, Isabel Wiseler-Lima, Maria da Graça Carvalho, Sara Skyttedal, Gheorghe Falcă, Henna Virkkunen Motion for a resolution Citation 29 a (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment - having regard to the Joint Declaration of Member States on Building the next generation cloud for businesses and the public sector in the EU, 2020 Or. en Amendment 6 Joëlle Mélin, Jérôme Rivière, Thierry Mariani, Markus Buchheit, Isabella Tovaglieri, Paolo Borchia Motion for a resolution Citation 29 a (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment PE660.285v01-00 4/173 AM\1218025EN.docx EN - having regard to the OECD report entitled 'Building back better: a sustainable, resilient recovery after COVID-19', published on 5 June 2020, Or. fr Amendment 7 Joëlle Mélin, Jérôme Rivière, Thierry Mariani, Markus Buchheit, Isabella Tovaglieri, Paolo Borchia Motion for a resolution Citation 29 b (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment - having regard to the programmatic book entitled 'COVID-19: The Great Reset', a plan to 'reset the world' published by the World Economic Forum and co-signed by Klaus Schwab and Thierry Malleret, Or. fr Amendment 8 Eva Maydell, Tomas Tobé, Edina Tóth, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Angelika Niebler, Maria da Graça Carvalho, Ivan Štefanec, Isabel Wiseler-Lima, Sara Skyttedal, Gheorghe Falcă, Henna Virkkunen Motion for a resolution Citation 29 b (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment - having regard to the Final report prepared by the High-Level Expert Group on Business-to-Government Data Sharing, 2020 Or. en Amendment 9 Manuel Bompard, Marisa Matias, Cornelia Ernst AM\1218025EN.docx 5/173 PE660.285v01-00 EN on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Motion for a resolution Recital A Motion for a resolution Amendment A. whereas digitalisation has A. whereas digitalisation has transformed the economy, society and transformed the economy, society and citizens’ daily lives, and whereas data, citizens’ daily lives, and whereas data, which is duplicated every 18 months, is at which is duplicated every 18 months, is at the heart of this transformation; the heart of this transformation; whereas digitalisation should also be an opportunity to reduce human exposure to harmful and hazardous conditions and help to create more quality and decent jobs; Or. en Amendment 10 Ignazio Corrao, Eleonora Evi Motion for a resolution Recital A Motion for a resolution Amendment A. whereas digitalisation has A. whereas digitalisation has transformed the economy, society and transformed the economy, society and citizens’ daily lives, and whereas data, citizens’ daily lives, and whereas data, which is duplicated every 18 months, is at which is duplicated every 18 months, is at the heart of this transformation; the heart of this transformation; whereas these processes will only accelerate in the future; Or. en Amendment 11 Nicola Danti, Andrus Ansip, Mauri Pekkarinen, Christophe Grudler, Valérie Hayer, Susana Solís Pérez, Dragoș Pîslaru, Iskra Mihaylova, Klemen Grošelj, Martina Dlabajová Motion for a resolution Recital A PE660.285v01-00 6/173 AM\1218025EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment A. whereas digitalisation has A. whereas digitalisation keeps transformed the economy, society and transforming the economy, society and citizens’ daily lives, and whereas data, citizens’ daily lives, and whereas data, which is duplicated every 18 months, is at which is duplicated every 18 months, is at the heart of this transformation; the heart of this transformation; Or. en Amendment 12 Joëlle Mélin, Jérôme Rivière, Thierry Mariani, Markus Buchheit, Isabella Tovaglieri, Paolo Borchia Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment Aa. whereas the volume of data stored worldwide will increase from 33 ZB in 2018 to 175 ZB in 2025, and whereas the internet of things and China will account for a significant proportion of this sharp rise; Or. fr Amendment 13 Eva Maydell, Tomas Tobé, Edina Tóth, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Angelika Niebler, Ivan Štefanec, Isabel Wiseler-Lima, Maria da Graça Carvalho, Sara Skyttedal, Gheorghe Falcă, Henna Virkkunen, Salvatore De Meo Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment A a. whereas digitalisation is not only an economic opportunity but also enhances security, geopolitical resilience and strategic relevance of the Union; Or. en AM\1218025EN.docx 7/173 PE660.285v01-00 EN Amendment 14 Manuel Bompard, Marisa Matias on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment A a. whereas artificial intelligence is one of the strategic technologies for the 21st century both globally and in Europe1a; _________________ 1a https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/doc ument/TA-8-2019-0081_FR.html Or. en Amendment 15 Manuel Bompard, Marisa Matias, Cornelia Ernst on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Motion for a resolution Recital A b (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment A b. whereas Midea, a Chinese household appliance company, finalised the acquisition in January 2017 of the European company KUKA AG, one of the world's leading suppliers of robotics, installation technology and intelligent systems engineering; whereas this takeover should have served as a wake-up call for the protection of the European AI sector, in particular for SMEs and start- ups; Or. en Amendment 16 Manuel Bompard, Marisa Matias, Cornelia Ernst PE660.285v01-00 8/173 AM\1218025EN.docx EN on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Motion for a resolution Recital A c (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment A c. whereas EU Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager has alerted member countries to the risks of Chinese takeovers during the coronavirus crisis; whereas the European Commission has pointed out that in the context of the COVID-19 crisis, there could be an increased risk of attempts to acquire healthcare capacity (e.g. for the production of medical or protective equipment) or related activities such as research institutes (e.g. for the development of vaccines) through foreign direct investment 1a; _________________ 1a https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/ rep/3/2020/FR/C-2020-1981-F1-FR- MAIN-PART-1.PDF Or. en Amendment 17 Manuel Bompard, Marisa Matias, Cornelia Ernst on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Motion for a resolution Recital A d (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment A d. whereas only public authorities have the means to undertake a large-scale social transition to a data economy; whereas the current digital giants, GAFAMs, have all benefited from the support of the American administration and the Chinese state, respectively through massive tax exemptions and subsidies; whereas European values can AM\1218025EN.docx 9/173 PE660.285v01-00 EN enable the European public authorities to plan this transition in a fair, redistributive way for companies and territories; Or. en Amendment 18 Manuel Bompard, Marisa Matias, Cornelia Ernst on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Motion for a resolution Recital A e (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment A e. whereas there are a number of ongoing investigations in the Member States into the abuse of the dominant position of GAFAM; whereas there is concern about the data collected by Google via its applications; Or. en Amendment 19 Manuel Bompard, Marisa Matias, Cornelia Ernst on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Motion for a resolution Recital B Motion for a resolution Amendment B. whereas data is an essential B. whereas data is an essential resource for economic growth, job creation resource for the recovery plan, job creation and societal progress and is a key enabler and societal progress and can be a key of the transition to green and climate- enabler of the transition to green and neutral societies; climate-neutral societies; whereas data localisation in the EU represents an important step towards strategic autonomy and reduction of emissions of the EU; whereas relocation of data centers in Europe should be considered under the Green taxonomy; whereas it is absolutely necessary to minimise the ecological footprint of digital technology PE660.285v01-00 10/173 AM\1218025EN.docx EN and in particular the volume of electrical and electronic waste; Or. en Amendment 20 Joëlle Mélin, Jérôme Rivière, Thierry Mariani, Isabella Tovaglieri, Paolo Borchia Motion for a resolution Recital B Motion for a resolution Amendment B.
Recommended publications
  • Azerbaijan Debacle: the Pace Debate on 23 January 2013

    Azerbaijan Debacle: the Pace Debate on 23 January 2013

    AZERBAIJAN DEBACLE: THE PACE DEBATE ON 23 JANUARY 2013 Christoph Straesser Pedro Agramunt Berlin 11 February 2013 CAST OF CHARACTERS JEAN-CLAUDE MIGNON, PACE PRESIDENT (FRANCE) ........................................................................................... 5 PEDRO AGRAMUNT (SPAIN) ......................................................................................................................................... 5 CHRISTOPH STRAESSER (GERMANY) .......................................................................................................................... 6 ANNE BRASSEUR (LUXEMBOURG) ............................................................................................................................... 8 ROBERT WALTER (UNITED KINGDOM) ..................................................................................................................... 9 LUCA VOLONTE (ITALY) .............................................................................................................................................. 10 VIOLA VON CRAMON-TAUBADEL (GERMANY) ....................................................................................................... 11 LISE CHRISTOFFERSEN (NORWAY) ........................................................................................................................... 12 JEAN-MARIE BOCKEL (FRANCE) ............................................................................................................................... 13 MARINA SCHUSTER (GERMANY) ..............................................................................................................................
  • Protokół Posiedzenia W Dniu 19 Września 2019 R. (2021/C 107/04)

    Protokół Posiedzenia W Dniu 19 Września 2019 R. (2021/C 107/04)

    C 107/84 PL Dziennik Urzędo wy U nii Europejskiej 26.3.2021 Czwartek, 19 września 2019 r. PROTOKÓŁ POSIEDZENIA W DNIU 19 WRZEŚNIA 2019 R. (2021/C 107/04) Spis treści Strona 1. Otwarcie posiedzenia . 87 2. Zdolność patentowa roślin i podstawowych procesów biologicznych (złożone projekty rezolucji) . 87 3. Składanie dokumentów . 87 4. Debata na temat przypadków naruszania praw człowieka, zasad demokracji i państwa prawa (debata) . 88 4.1. Sytuacja w Turcji, w szczególności odwołanie burmistrzów wyłonionych w wyborach . 88 4.2. Mjanma/Birma, w szczególności sytuacja Rohingjów . 89 4.3. Iran, w szczególności sytuacja obrońców praw kobiet i uwięzionych obywateli UE o podwójnym 89 obywatelstwie . 5. Wznowienie posiedzenia . 90 6. Skład komisji i delegacji . 90 7. Głosowanie . 90 7.1. Sytuacja w Turcji, w szczególności odwołanie burmistrzów wyłonionych w wyborach 90 (głosowanie) . 7.2. Mjanma/Birma, w szczególności sytuacja Rohingjów (głosowanie) . 91 7.3. Iran, w szczególności sytuacja obrońców praw kobiet i uwięzionych obywateli UE o podwójnym 92 obywatelstwie (głosowanie) . 7.4. Zdolność patentowa roślin i podstawowych procesów biologicznych (głosowanie) . 92 7.5. Znaczenie pamięci o przeszłości Europy dla jej przyszłości (głosowanie) . 93 7.6. Stan wdrażania przepisów dotyczących przeciwdziałania praniu pieniędzy (głosowanie) . 94 8. Wyjaśnienia dotyczące stanowiska zajętego w głosowaniu . 94 9. Korekty oddanych głosów i zgłoszenia zamiaru oddania głosu . 94 10. Wznowienie posiedzenia . 94 11. Zatwierdzenie protokołu poprzedniego posiedzenia . 95 26.3.2021 PL Dziennik Urzędo wy U nii Europejskiej C 107/85 Czwartek, 19 września 2019 r. Spis treści Strona 12. Skład komisji i delegacji . 95 13. Zagrożenie statusu służb ochotniczej straży pożarnej w Unii Europejskiej (debata) .
  • European Parliament 2019-2024

    European Parliament 2019-2024

    European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ITRE_PV(2019)0925_1 MINUTES Meeting of 25 September 2019, 9.00-12.30 and 14.30-18.30 BRUSSELS 25 September 2019, 9.00 – 10.00 In camera 1. Coordinators’ meeting The Coordinators’ meeting was held from 9.00 to 10.00 in camera with Adina-Ioana Vălean (Chair) in the chair. (See Annex I) * * * The meeting opened at 10.04 on Wednesday, 25 September 2019, with Adina-Ioana Vălean (Chair) presiding. 2. Adoption of agenda The agenda was adopted. PV\1189744EN.docx PE641.355 EN United in diversityEN 3. Chair’s announcements Chair’s announcements concerning coordinators’ decisions of 3 September 2019. Chair has informed the Committee members that the Committee meeting of 7-8 October has been cancelled due to the Commissioner hearing. The next ITRE Committee meeting will take place on the 17 October 2019. 4. Approval of minutes of meetings 2-3 September 2019 PV – PE641.070v01-00 The minutes were approved. *** Electronic vote *** 5. Establishing the European Cybersecurity Industrial, Technology and Research Competence Centre and the Network of National Coordination Centres ITRE/9/01206 ***I 2018/0328(COD) COM(2018)0630 – C8-0404/2018 Rapporteur: Rasmus Andresen (Verts/ALE) Responsible: ITRE Vote on the decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations The decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations was adopted: for: 49; against: 12; abstention: 2. (Due to technical issues, roll-call page is not available) 6. Labelling of tyres with respect to fuel efficiency and other essential parameters ITRE/9/01207 ***I 2018/0148(COD) COM(2018)0296 – C8-0190/2018 Rapporteur: Michał Boni Responsible: ITRE Vote on the decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations The decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations was adopted: for: 56; against: 3; abstention: 4.
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast

    European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast

    Briefing May 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 6 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 5 seats 1 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener Karin Feldinger 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Petra Steger Monika Vana* Stefan Windberger 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath Roman Haider Thomas Waitz* Stefan Zotti 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide Vesna Schuster Olga Voglauer Nini Tsiklauri 6. Wolfram Pirchner Julia Elisabeth Herr Elisabeth Dieringer-Granza Thomas Schobesberger Johannes Margreiter 7. Christian Sagartz Christian Alexander Dax Josef Graf Teresa Reiter 8. Barbara Thaler Stefanie Mösl Maximilian Kurz Isak Schneider 9. Christian Zoll Luca Peter Marco Kaiser Andrea Kerbleder Peter Berry 10. Claudia Wolf-Schöffmann Theresa Muigg Karin Berger Julia Reichenhauser NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. Likely to be elected Unlikely to be elected or *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. and/or take seat to take seat, if elected European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Paul Magnette 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 2. Maria Arena* 2.
  • Identit〠E Democrazia

    Identit〠E Democrazia

    Identità e Democrazia Da Wikipedia, l'enciclopedia libera. Identità e Democrazia (in inglese: Identity and Identità e Democrazia Democracy, ID) è un gruppo politico del Parlamento Europeo di destra, fondato nel 2019 dopo le elezioni (EN) Identity and Democracy europee del 2019. Il gruppo è il successore del gruppo Presidente Marco Zanni fondato nel 2015 Europa delle Nazioni e della Libertà. (Lega) Vicepresidente Nicolas Bay (RN) Jörg Meuthen Indice (AfD) Storia Stato Unione Obiettivi politici europea Composizione Abbreviazione ID Note Fondazione 13 giugno 2019 Voci correlate Ideologia Nazionalismo Conservatorismo Storia nazionale Populismo di Il 12 giugno 2019 è stato annunciato che il gruppo destra successore a Europa delle Nazioni e delle Libertà si Identitarismo sarebbe chiamato "Identità e Democrazia" e avrebbe Sovranismo incluso partiti come la Lega Nord (Italia), Anti-immigrazione Raggruppamento Nazionale (Francia) e Alternativa per la Collocazione Destra [1] Germania (Germania)[2]. Il leghista Marco Zanni è stato Partito europeo AEPN nominato Presidente[3]. Il 13 giugno 2019 il gruppo, composto da 73 europarlamentari, è stato lanciato a Seggi 73 / 751 Bruxelles da Marine Le Pen[4]. Europarlamento Obiettivi politici I principali obiettivi politici del gruppo sono bloccare una maggiore integrazione europea ed ottenere maggiore autonomia nelle politiche di spesa, ovvero la possibilità di fare maggiore deficit e debito senza incorrere in penalità da parte della Commissione Europea.[5] Composizione Identità e Democrazia è formato da
  • Hon. Mr President of the European Parliament, Dear David Sassoli

    Hon. Mr President of the European Parliament, Dear David Sassoli

    Hon. Mr President of the European Parliament, Dear David Sassoli, Since March, when the outbreak of COVID-19 intensified in Europe, the functioning of the European Parliament (EP) has changed dramatically, due to the sanitary measures applied. We understand the inevitability of the contingency plan, taking into account the need to prevent infection and the spread of the virus and to protect the health and lives of people. Six months later, the functioning of the EP is gradually returning to normal. However, there are services whose unavailability seriously impairs parliamentary work, namely the interpretation service. The European Union (EU) has 24 official languages and all deserve the same respect and treatment. We recognize that the number of languages available in committee meeting rooms has been increasing, but even so, more than half of the languages still have no interpretation. Multilingualism is a right enshrined in the Treaties that allows Members to express themselves in their own language. Now, that is not happening and we are concerned that the situation will continue, even taking into account the expected workflow in the commissions after these atypical six months. In this sense, we appeal, once again, to you, the President of the EP for the application of the letter and the spirit of the principle of multilingualism, finding solutions that respect this principle and that allow the use of any of the 24 official languages of the EU. The expression of each deputy in her/his own language is a priority so that there can be conditions to fully exercise the mandate for which she/he was elected and a condition of respect for the citizens who elected her/him.
  • Members of the European Parliament Mr Janusz

    Members of the European Parliament Mr Janusz

    Members of the European Parliament Mr Janusz Wojciechowski Commissioner for Agriculture European Commission Rue de la Loi 200 B-1049 Bruxelles Mr Virginijus Sinkevičius Commissioner for Environment, Oceans and Fisheries European Commission Rue de la Loi 200 B-1049 Bruxelles Brussels, 11 November 2020 Subject: Deforestation and illegal logging of Romania’s primary forests Dear Commissioners, we, the undersigned Members of the European Parliament, are addressing you to express our deep concerns about massive violations of the protection of Natura 2000 areas, primary and ancient forests and UNESCO World Heritage Sites in Romania. In Romania, deforestation caused by illegal logging is continuing on an alarming scale. It threatens the last and irreplaceable primary forests in the EU, which are more crucial than ever in the fight against climate change and for the preservation of biodiversity. According to expert estimates, up to two thirds of the EU’s remaining primary forests are located in Romania. Largely untouched areas in the Romanian Carpathian Mountains and the Făgăraș Mountains have survived until today – a European if not global heritage of invaluable ecological value. Some of these forests are also included in the List of World Heritage Sites UNESCO.1 Now, ruthless greed and large-scale corruption are seriously endangering these European natural treasures and the time for protective measures is running out. If no immediate action is taken, the still existing forests will soon be lost forever. Since the launch of the European Commission’s infringement procedure against Romania on 12 February 2020 for failing to establish effective measures against illegal logging2, thousands more hectares were destroyed.
  • Priority Question for Written Answer

    Priority Question for Written Answer

    Priority question for written answer P-002058/2020 to the Commission Rule 138 Julie Lechanteux (ID), Mathilde Androuët (ID), Jordan Bardella (ID), Aurelia Beigneux (ID), Dominique Bilde (ID), Annika Bruna (ID), Gilbert Collard (ID), Jean-Paul Garraud (ID), Catherine Griset (ID), Jean-François Jalkh (ID), France Jamet (ID), Virginie Joron (ID), Herve Juvin (ID), Jean-Lin Lacapelle (ID), Hélène Laporte (ID), Gilles Lebreton (ID), Thierry Mariani (ID), André Rougé (ID), Nicolas Bay (ID), Maxette Pirbakas (ID) Subject: Legal basis for geo-tracking and the sharing of personal data during the coronavirus outbreak On 24 March 2020, the Commission revealed that it had held talks with telecommunications operators about joining forces to tackle the coronavirus outbreak. Thierry Breton, the Internal Market Commissioner, held a videoconference with the heads of Europe’s telecommunications companies and the GSMA (Global System for Mobile Communications) to explore options for sharing geolocation metadata in order to map and forecast the spread of the virus. The Commission claims that such a move would be fully in line with the General Data Protection Regulation and e-privacy legislation. How does the Commission intend to guarantee EU citizens full anonymisation of their personal data? How exactly does the Commission envisage using such data? Not content with surveillance and quarantine enforcement, Israel and a number of Asian countries have adopted a proactive AI-based approach that alerts individuals if they have been in contact with a virus carrier. How do the Commission’s plans compare, and what logistical support will it provide the Member States which opt for this approach? PE650.848v01-00.
  • 17.3.2021 A9-0033/1 Amendment 1 István Ujhelyi, Cláudia Monteiro De

    17.3.2021 A9-0033/1 Amendment 1 István Ujhelyi, Cláudia Monteiro De

    17.3.2021 A9-0033/1 Amendment 1 István Ujhelyi, Cláudia Monteiro de Aguiar, Elena Kountoura, Johan Danielsson, Giuseppe Ferrandino, Josianne Cutajar, Isabel García Muñoz, Benoît Lutgen, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Elissavet Vozemberg-Vrionidi, Rovana Plumb, Sylvie Guillaume, Vera Tax, Andreas Schieder, Andris Ameriks, Sara Cerdas, Petar Vitanov, Klára Dobrev, Attila Ara-Kovács, Maria Grapini, Dominique Riquet, Csaba Molnár, Sándor Rónai, Ismail Ertug, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Clara Aguilera, Marcos Ros Sempere, Heléne Fritzon, Victor Negrescu, Inma Rodríguez-Piñero, Alexis Georgoulis, Alfred Sant, Erik Bergkvist, Carlos Zorrinho, Dimitrios Papadimoulis, César Luena, Eider Gardiazabal Rubial, Cristina Maestre Martín De Almagro, Rosa D’Amato, Evin Incir, Marc Angel, Maria-Manuel Leitão-Marques, Pedro Marques, Valter Flego, Katalin Cseh, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Seán Kelly, Ignazio Corrao, Isabel Santos, Alicia Homs Ginel, Robert Hajšel, Nacho Sánchez Amor, Javi López, Alex Agius Saliba, Demetris Papadakis, Marc Tarabella, Sergei Stanishev, Paolo De Castro, Anna Júlia Donáth, Nora Mebarek, Leszek Miller, Margarida Marques, Adriana Maldonado López, Lina Gálvez Muñoz, Eva Kaili, Juozas Olekas, Isabel Carvalhais, Hannes Heide, Márton Gyöngyösi, Estrella Durá Ferrandis, Monika Beňová, Pina Picierno, Dietmar Köster, Agnes Jongerius, Miroslav Číž, Günther Sidl, Pietro Bartolo, Ibán García Del Blanco, Jytte Guteland, Mónica Silvana González Report A9-0033/2021 Cláudia Monteiro de Aguiar EU strategy for sustainable tourism (2020/2038(INI))
  • Brussels, 17 September 2020 Dear Prime Minister Stefan Löfven, Dear

    Brussels, 17 September 2020 Dear Prime Minister Stefan Löfven, Dear

    Brussels, 17 September 2020 Dear Prime Minister Stefan Löfven, Dear Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Environment and Climate Isabella Lövin, We, Members of the European Parliament, are writing to ask the Swedish government to stop the expansion of the Preemraff oil refinery in Lysekil. As we have been made aware, it is now in the hands and power of your government to stop this huge fossil fuel project, locking our societies into further fossil fuel dependency. The message from scientists and the global environmental movement is unambiguous: Fossil fuels are not the future. If your government would grant Preemraff permission to expand, the refinery’s emissions would increase by 1 million tons of carbon dioxide per year, making it Sweden’s single biggest source of carbon dioxide emissions. As you are well aware, climate change is one of the most pressing issues of our time. Several parliaments around the world, including the European Parliament, have declared a climate urgency. A global youth movement, spearheaded by Swedish activist Greta Thunberg, is calling for an immediate, radical change to fight the global warming of the planet. Two years ago, the Swedish Climate Act was passed in the parliament, obliging the government’s climate policy to be aligned with the climate targets leading to zero net greenhouse gas emissions by 2045 and to negative net emissions after 2045. In your annual government declaration, on September 8, you stated that ”We are the leading nation in the world fighting climate change.” We recognize the international voice and the important work done by the Swedish government to counteract climate change, and we welcome Sweden’s ambition to be a model nation in promoting and implementing progressive climate policies.
  • Question for Written Answer

    Question for Written Answer

    Question for written answer E-005578/2020 to the Council Rule 138 Julie Lechanteux (ID), Virginie Joron (ID), André Rougé (ID), Jean-Lin Lacapelle (ID), Maximilian Krah (ID), Gilles Lebreton (ID), Gunnar Beck (ID), Herve Juvin (ID), France Jamet (ID) Subject: Navalny case: additional sanctions against Russia On 7 October 2020, the German and French Ministers for Foreign Affairs announced their intention of proposing additional sanctions against Russia to their European partners, stating that 'there is no other plausible explanation' than Russia being responsible for the incident involving the politician Alexei Navalny1, which he himself has described as an attempted poisoning. This explanation harks back to the famous 'highly likely’ statement made in 2018 by the then British Prime Minister, Theresa May. Apparently, the two ministers did not need to wait for the findings of a judicial investigation to assign responsibility (naming defendants), establish guilt (delivering a verdict) and impose sanctions (handing down sentences), in a case that is still far from being definitively solved. Does the Council not take the view that such a decision violates Articles 48 and 51 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, which state that 'everyone who has been charged shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law’ and that 'the provisions of this Charter are addressed to the institutions and bodies of the Union with due regard for the principle of subsidiarity and to the Member States only when they are implementing Union law'? Supporters2 1 https://agenceurope.eu/fr/bulletin/article/12576/39 2 This question is supported by Members other than the authors: Jean-Paul Garraud (ID), Thierry Mariani (ID) PE659.594v01-00.
  • En En Amendments 1

    En En Amendments 1

    European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on Transport and Tourism 2020/2091(INI) 18.1.2021 AMENDMENTS 1 - 83 Draft opinion Carlo Fidanza (PE659.025v01-00) Implementation of the Ambient Air Quality Directives: Directive 2004/107/EC and Directive 2008/50/EC (2020/2091(INI)) AM\1222480EN.docx PE663.275v01-00 EN United in diversityEN AM_Com_NonLegOpinion PE663.275v01-00 2/42 AM\1222480EN.docx EN Amendment 1 Pär Holmgren Draft opinion Paragraph -1 (new) Draft opinion Amendment -1. Stresses that air pollution is one of the main causes of premature deaths, with the EEA having estimated a number of over 400,000 annual deaths at EU level, which is around ten times more than car accident-related deaths, and amounts to nearly 5 million of Years of Life Lost; Or. en Amendment 2 Pär Holmgren Draft opinion Paragraph -1 a (new) Draft opinion Amendment -1 a. Points to scientific evidence of the negative impact of road transport emissions for respiratory diseases and other major health problems; highlights recent judicial decisions establishing direct causality between long-term road traffic exposure and respiratory diseases eventually causing death, as well as on air pollution effects of worsening health conditions in the home country as a reason to halt deportation; Or. en Amendment 3 Pär Holmgren Draft opinion Paragraph -1 b (new) AM\1222480EN.docx 3/42 PE663.275v01-00 EN Draft opinion Amendment -1 b. Recalls that according to the 2018 Air quality report by the EEA, more than 50% of the population were exposed to most of the main pollutants; Or. en Amendment 4 Pär Holmgren Draft opinion Paragraph -1 c (new) Draft opinion Amendment -1 c.